Henry Avila's Reviews > Northanger Abbey
Northanger Abbey
by
by
Catherine Morland is your typical seventeen -year- old -girl, of the turn of the century (19th, that is). She reads too much, an illness that is sadly terminal, Gothic books are her passion and the rage of the era . Any ancient home that is eerie , ominous or sinister the young lady would enjoy seeing, if there were any in the area. She lives in a quiet English village, (too quiet) where everyone knows each other, which keeps the populous from misadventures. Her parents have ten children and surprisingly, her mother is alive and healthy. Miss Morland's father is a well to do clergyman, but with all those kids, nobody would know especially Catherine. Mrs. Allen a wealthy neighbor is going on a six -week vacation to Bath, with Mr.Allen ( he has the fashionable gout ), the most famous resort in England. Mrs. Allen needs an agreeable companion to talk to, she's rather silly, asks Catherine. Her chief interest is clothes, still how long can you speak about fashion, before it gets tiresome? The fatigued husband doesn't stay in her presence very long. Arriving in town is exciting and daunting, soon people start to notice Miss Catherine Morland particularly young men, a new experience for her. She grew up a tomboy playing outside with the boys, not inside with dolls. Yet the last three years her homely awkwardness has vanished, a pleasant, pretty appearance she acquires that even her astonished mother, acknowledges. Catherine soon forms a friendship with Isabella Thorpe a beautiful, deceitful, gold digger, her family has little, but she has ... at 21, time is running out for her to catch a rich husband. It doesn't take long to discover that Catherine's brother James, and Isabella's brother John, are best friends, so naturally the two ladies also become too. Then the brothers of the girls come to town, unexpectedly. Catherine loves her plain looking older brother, and you can imagine the shock that she feels, when James and Isabella become engaged! Yes, it's the first time Catherine has been out of her insulated village, of Fullerton. Still true love has a rocky road to travel, when it isn't. Henry Tilney a wealthy man's son, meets the charming Catherine at a dance. She has eyes for him, but so does Isabella's annoying brother John, for her (he's always talking about his horses). However Henry's older brother Captain Frederick Tilney, arrives too, very popular Bath is for romance and starts flirting with Isabella, which she doesn't mind but James does. He has more money than Catherine's brother. The resort is famous for the miraculous waters, though most go there for the dancing, plays, card games and walking around in the Grand Pump Room and meeting the rich... Showing everyone who's interested they're in town, nobody is... Later Catherine is invited by General Tilney the father of Henry, to go to Northanger Abbey, his home. Amazingly a real Gothic house with his son, and daughter Eleanor, another friend of Catherine 's and stay a few weeks. The girl with a wild imagination is thrilled, finally, all Catherine's dreams have come to pass ...
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Northanger Abbey.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 26, 2013
– Shelved as:
to-read
June 26, 2013
– Shelved
December 30, 2013
–
Started Reading
January 6, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 59 (59 new)
Nothing better than an Austen to let one's steam out and get in the right mood. I love that last sentence Herny, wild imagination indeed! Maybe not my favorite by Austen but a light and entertaining short story with a classic message for girls to keep their feet on the ground! :)
Lynne wrote: "Henry, As soon as I saw the title here, my anticipation arrived and I wondered "Now how is Henry going to handle this one" and you have succeeded brilliantly.
In addition, you've actually made the..."
Lynne,I do my best.
In addition, you've actually made the..."
Lynne,I do my best.
Dolors wrote: "Nothing better than an Austen to let one's steam out and get in the right mood. I love that last sentence Herny, wild imagination indeed! Maybe not my favorite by Austen but a light and entertainin..."
Dolors,reading this book shows me again, that human nature hasn't changed in centuries.It never does.
Dolors,reading this book shows me again, that human nature hasn't changed in centuries.It never does.
I haven't read this one, and Henry, your review has me thinking I need to find a copy from our library. Thanks!
You are welcome,Traci.An interesting book.If you have read Udolpho,Castle of Otranto,The Monk.Any Gothic novel of that period.It makes it more fun to read.
Henry wrote: "Alejandro wrote: "Jane Austen rules!!! :D"
My second Austen,Alejandro, and won't be my last."
Excellent to know!!!
My second Austen,Alejandro, and won't be my last."
Excellent to know!!!
Bette Booklover wrote: "so good to see a guy liking Jane! excellent review"
I like Jane Austen,Bette.My girlfriend doesn't...
I like Jane Austen,Bette.My girlfriend doesn't...
Alejandro wrote: "Henry wrote: "Alejandro wrote: "Jane Austen rules!!! :D"
My second Austen,Alejandro, and won't be my last."
Excellent to know!!!"
Have Sense and Sensibility, unread at home.Hope to read it soon.
My second Austen,Alejandro, and won't be my last."
Excellent to know!!!"
Have Sense and Sensibility, unread at home.Hope to read it soon.
Henry wrote: "Bette Booklover wrote: "so good to see a guy liking Jane! excellent review"
I like Jane Austen.Bette.My girlfriend doesn't..."
I am not surprised. It's a cliché that only women like romance novels. It's totally normal finding females readers that don't enjoy romance stuff. And also normal to find men who likes romance novels.
In my case, the key factor is knowing what I am going to read. I like romance novels when I am certain that that's what I'm gonna read. My problem is when I am reading sometimes urban fantasy and it turns a romantic novel where the love takes over the importance of the supposed mission/adventure. But, if I know that that's what I'm gonna read, so, I will enjoy any good paranormal romance book.
I hope I was able to explain my case hehehe ;)
I like Jane Austen.Bette.My girlfriend doesn't..."
I am not surprised. It's a cliché that only women like romance novels. It's totally normal finding females readers that don't enjoy romance stuff. And also normal to find men who likes romance novels.
In my case, the key factor is knowing what I am going to read. I like romance novels when I am certain that that's what I'm gonna read. My problem is when I am reading sometimes urban fantasy and it turns a romantic novel where the love takes over the importance of the supposed mission/adventure. But, if I know that that's what I'm gonna read, so, I will enjoy any good paranormal romance book.
I hope I was able to explain my case hehehe ;)
Henry wrote: "Alejandro wrote: "Henry wrote: "Alejandro wrote: "Jane Austen rules!!! :D"
My second Austen,Alejandro, and won't be my last."
Excellent to know!!!"
Have Sense and Sensibility, unread at home.Hope..."
That's my favorite book and movie adaptation too ;)
My second Austen,Alejandro, and won't be my last."
Excellent to know!!!"
Have Sense and Sensibility, unread at home.Hope..."
That's my favorite book and movie adaptation too ;)
Henry wrote: "Better than Pride and Prejudice? Which I loved..."
Usually Pride and Prejudice is the favorite of most of Austen's fans. Maybe since my introduction to Jane Austen's work was the movie adaptation, I always favored the novel over the others.
Usually Pride and Prejudice is the favorite of most of Austen's fans. Maybe since my introduction to Jane Austen's work was the movie adaptation, I always favored the novel over the others.
Henry wrote: "I'll read it soon, but have so many great unread books at home."
The same situation here ;)
The same situation here ;)
Thanks,LeeAnne. Been reading a lot of it lately,The Monk, Vathek, The Castle of Otranto and my favorite, The Mysteries of Udolpho.This book is a fun parody of them.
I read a lot of gothic, but I have never tried any of original classics you listed. Now you've inspired me!
Otranto is the first Gothic novel, Vathek,the strangest,Monk the most over the top,trying to shock, and Udolpho the best, but very long.All written and published in the 1700's. Wrote reviews of them all.
I will read all of your reviews and decide which one but I think I might be leaning towards The Mysteries of Udolpho, since it is your favorite!
Just read through the comments, Henry - I'm surprised no one has mentioned Persuasion - that's my favourite Jane Austin, and I've read them all, and all more than once, some several times, but none recently...
This one prompted me to read The Mysteries of Udolpho. What an extravagance that was! But then, I'm not a big gothic romance fan - give me Ann Elliot's practicality before Catherine Morland's fantasies anytime. But Austen did have a good laugh at the Gothic genre at poor Catherine's expense.
This one prompted me to read The Mysteries of Udolpho. What an extravagance that was! But then, I'm not a big gothic romance fan - give me Ann Elliot's practicality before Catherine Morland's fantasies anytime. But Austen did have a good laugh at the Gothic genre at poor Catherine's expense.
Read Udolpho and did a review .Want to read all Austen 's and Bronte Sisters books, between sci- fi and adventure novels and classics.That's the fun of reading,enjoy Gothic also.
Wow, how'd I miss this when you posted it? I'm often a bit wary of your reviews when it comes to things I haven't read (don't like to be spoiled, even to early stuff), but heaven knows that's not the cast this time!
Sounds like you have the background to really appreciate this book, but I notice it still only got two stars from you. It's my least favorite Jane Austen -- I've read maybe half of a couple of the gothics she's parodying, but always bail on them with the "life's too short" excuse, so I'm a bit handicapped as a reader. David Shapard's annotations helped, and I like it more than I once did, but still my least favorite Austen. Which, in practice, just means it's never been my most favorite; bad Austen is still good stuff, I think.
Sounds like you have the background to really appreciate this book, but I notice it still only got two stars from you. It's my least favorite Jane Austen -- I've read maybe half of a couple of the gothics she's parodying, but always bail on them with the "life's too short" excuse, so I'm a bit handicapped as a reader. David Shapard's annotations helped, and I like it more than I once did, but still my least favorite Austen. Which, in practice, just means it's never been my most favorite; bad Austen is still good stuff, I think.
No problem..Thank you ,Sheryl, I gave this one four stars, a fun parody of the Gothic books we both read from the 1700's.It helps when a person is familiar with this type and the novels mentioned in it. Makes it more amusing.
I am pretty sure that I read this story, but your wonderful review makes me hope I haven't yet, Henry.
It is okay to read it again,Cherie, a great book that many people don't realize, is making loving fun, of Gothic novels.
So many people cite Pride and Prejudice as their favorite Jane Austen novel. Not me! My favorite is Northanger Abbey, which is hilarious.
Pride and Prejudice has been updated in Bridget Jones's Diary, and Emma has been updated on film as Clueless. But the one crying up for a 21st century treatment is this novel. A teenaged girl with an overactive imagination, a flirty gold-digger, an underappreciated younger son, and a nasty piece of work of an old man? Still works perfectly today.
Pride and Prejudice has been updated in Bridget Jones's Diary, and Emma has been updated on film as Clueless. But the one crying up for a 21st century treatment is this novel. A teenaged girl with an overactive imagination, a flirty gold-digger, an underappreciated younger son, and a nasty piece of work of an old man? Still works perfectly today.
I like them, and will read more 1700's Gothic novels... Fascinated by people who lived in that time, and wrote about it.
Henry wrote: "Superstitious times bred anxiety in unsophisticated people."
That is true, but I think something else was at play. It was a time, much like our own, in which technology was moving so rapidly that it made people uneasy. What is this spate of dystopian novels but a reaction to runaway technology? OMG! thought Victorian writers, medicine is moving at such a fast clip that they'll soon be able to reanimate the dead! OMG! we think today, technology is moving at such a fast clip that they'll soon be able to completely control us, as in The Hunger Games, Divergent, and all the other rip-offs.
In the same way, the sci-fi binge of the 1950s was clearly a reaction to the Soviet threat, two forms of alien invasion.
That is true, but I think something else was at play. It was a time, much like our own, in which technology was moving so rapidly that it made people uneasy. What is this spate of dystopian novels but a reaction to runaway technology? OMG! thought Victorian writers, medicine is moving at such a fast clip that they'll soon be able to reanimate the dead! OMG! we think today, technology is moving at such a fast clip that they'll soon be able to completely control us, as in The Hunger Games, Divergent, and all the other rip-offs.
In the same way, the sci-fi binge of the 1950s was clearly a reaction to the Soviet threat, two forms of alien invasion.
Radiation caused mutations that brought forth monsters, in those sci- fi films, of the 50's, cold war fears in fact.
In addition, you've actually made the book sound more "exciting" than it actually is!