Ajna's Reviews > Evocation

Evocation by S.T. Gibson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
80479511
's review

liked it

This book didn’t leave me with much at all – and I mean it in a derogative way. The premises were good, and so was the aesthetic: I liked the setting and I believe I liked the characters as well, if taken singularly. I didn’t really like their relationships and I especially disliked the way they acted when they were together. Obviously, I liked David the most: he had some great lines, he was funny yet complex and layered and, in my opinion, a quite likeable character, for he had a story, a past and everything a character needs to exist. However, David with Rhys was a whole other matter. Maybe my problem was that there was more romance than I anticipated? Yeah, maybe. But I cannot say that the magic system, the curse and the Society were exactly crystal clear to me, or that the author really took her time explaining them. So, to summarise, there were some considerable missing pieces and a little too much no sense going on around here – the writing was good though!
42 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Evocation.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 3, 2024 – Shelved as: to-read
April 3, 2024 – Shelved
August 1, 2024 – Started Reading
August 2, 2024 –
35.0%
August 3, 2024 –
52.0%
August 5, 2024 –
73.0%
August 6, 2024 –
82.0% "I watched the Olympics for the whole day 🫡"
August 14, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Ingerlisa Great review, I felt the exact same way! I found David and Rhys to be such an odd pairing their romance really felt out of place for me. And I agree the world building / magic system was kinda confusing 🫤


message 2: by Ajna (last edited Aug 15, 2024 07:37AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ajna @Ingerlisa thank you, bby! 🤍 and yeah, they were quite an odd pair themselves, with Moira in between them it was just a bit chaotic. maybe there’ll be more explanations in the sequel, but it was kinda lacking as a book on its own ☹️


back to top