Jultri's Reviews > It Had to Be a Duke

It Had to Be a Duke by Vivienne Lorret
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
11762474
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: straight-laced-pompous-hero, spinster, fake-engagement-or-relationship, hate-to-love, humorous

4.5/5. Thoroughly entertaining book - lots of laughs and very likeable protagonists. I gave up on this author several years ago after one too many so-so release. I'm glad I gave her another chance because this was a truly entertaining read, very funny but also pulling on some heart-strings. Verity did dig herself the biggest hole to try to work her way out of, but she is so earnest and not at all intimidated by the fury of an incensed duke. As for for said incensed duke, poor man was befuddled and discombobulated by Verity from the word go. He stood no chance.
22 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read It Had to Be a Duke.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 4, 2023 – Shelved as: to-read
December 4, 2023 – Shelved
December 9, 2023 – Started Reading
January 12, 2024 – Shelved as: straight-laced-pompous-hero
January 12, 2024 – Shelved as: spinster
January 12, 2024 – Shelved as: fake-engagement-or-relationship
January 12, 2024 – Shelved as: hate-to-love
January 12, 2024 – Shelved as: humorous
January 12, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Lori ♡ (Recovering DNF Addict) ◡̈ Great review, I might give this author another chance then. This sounds like a cute story 😊


Jultri Lori 📚☕️ wrote: "Great review, I might give this author another chance then. This sounds like a cute story 😊"

Thanks Lori. I hope you will enjoy it also.


MarilynLovesNature When I see covers where the guy isn't wearing a shirt, it seems like a signal that it contains explicit sex. Or am I wrong, lol? I didn't think that was acceptable fashion in the regency era.


MarilynLovesNature Pretty soon I'll run out of Georgette Hayers to read!


MarilynLovesNature Sorry, Heyer in the plural.


Jultri MarilynLovesNature wrote: "When I see covers where the guy isn't wearing a shirt, it seems like a signal that it contains explicit sex. Or am I wrong, lol? I didn't think that was acceptable fashion in the regency era."
Truthfully, I don't even notice the cover most of the time when I pick and read a book. It is not a clean book and there was a bedroom scene and two. It was probably more lurid than a Balogh book and definitely more than a Heyer book but far less than some contemporary HRs. I'm not sure if that helps. You obviously love your Heyer enough to want multiples of her. 😄


back to top