Emily May's Reviews > Blood Meridian
Blood Meridian
by
by
Blood Meridian has been on my to read list for well over a decade because, quite honestly, I sensed it was not my cup of tea.
I’m not sure why exactly… maybe it’s that I’ve suffered my way through Faulkner and Hemingway already and had this gut feeling that they and McCarthy would sit at the same super deep literary dudes lunch table, y’know?
But it is one of those books that has wormed its way onto lists of "must read before you die" and "greatest American literature" so I just had to know. And now I do.
Blood Meridian was pretty much ignored by critics when it was first released and it wasn't until later that a bunch of them-- Harold Bloom, David Foster Wallace, etc. etc. --decided it was a super deep and clever book about human nature and violence. I understand completely why it was ignored initially and not so much why it was rediscovered as a masterpiece.
What happens in this book is that a group of murderers called the Glanton gang go from town to town brutally killing and scalping indigenous Americans, as well as others. There is an unnamed protagonist, the "kid", and a dispassionate narration of this happened and then this happened and they all lay in pools of blood.
Lots of people die gruesome deaths, but they were just 2D, just words on a page, because Mccarthy made no effort to warm us to any of them. I was told the book was disturbing but I found it far too cold and unmoving to be disturbing. I would have been more disturbed if a single one of the characters felt real.
McCarthy describes the mountains and weather in exceptional run-on detail. It would go like… the cymballic thunder crashed and reflected against the shimmering water lightning cleaved the sky asunder behind the precipitous mountain shadows… and then he ripped the scalps off all the Indians and left a town full of corpses… before plundering on into the blood-red sunset through rolling grasslands and flower-carpeted meadows shrouded in post-storm haze.
Looong descriptions of rocks and grass and then PHWACK! there goes someone’s scalp...
I could not understand what we were supposed to care about in this book. Certainly not this band of murderers, but equally unlikely all the nameless, faceless "savages" and n-words dropping left and right.
I've been genuinely trying to understand the appeal of Blood Meridian to its fans. I read some reviews, and also some of the furious comments left on negative reviews, and it seems like there are people for whom this type of writing is truly the epitome of beauty. That's fair. McCarthy does spend a long time on description. But it is just not for me.
I read passages like this and I get Nevernight vibes:
It's an eye roll from me.
Also, I’m getting tired of authors who are just too intellectual and literary for punctuation. Great, you know how to not use speech marks and commas. I’m happy for you.
I’m not sure why exactly… maybe it’s that I’ve suffered my way through Faulkner and Hemingway already and had this gut feeling that they and McCarthy would sit at the same super deep literary dudes lunch table, y’know?
But it is one of those books that has wormed its way onto lists of "must read before you die" and "greatest American literature" so I just had to know. And now I do.
Blood Meridian was pretty much ignored by critics when it was first released and it wasn't until later that a bunch of them-- Harold Bloom, David Foster Wallace, etc. etc. --decided it was a super deep and clever book about human nature and violence. I understand completely why it was ignored initially and not so much why it was rediscovered as a masterpiece.
What happens in this book is that a group of murderers called the Glanton gang go from town to town brutally killing and scalping indigenous Americans, as well as others. There is an unnamed protagonist, the "kid", and a dispassionate narration of this happened and then this happened and they all lay in pools of blood.
Lots of people die gruesome deaths, but they were just 2D, just words on a page, because Mccarthy made no effort to warm us to any of them. I was told the book was disturbing but I found it far too cold and unmoving to be disturbing. I would have been more disturbed if a single one of the characters felt real.
McCarthy describes the mountains and weather in exceptional run-on detail. It would go like… the cymballic thunder crashed and reflected against the shimmering water lightning cleaved the sky asunder behind the precipitous mountain shadows… and then he ripped the scalps off all the Indians and left a town full of corpses… before plundering on into the blood-red sunset through rolling grasslands and flower-carpeted meadows shrouded in post-storm haze.
Looong descriptions of rocks and grass and then PHWACK! there goes someone’s scalp...
I could not understand what we were supposed to care about in this book. Certainly not this band of murderers, but equally unlikely all the nameless, faceless "savages" and n-words dropping left and right.
I've been genuinely trying to understand the appeal of Blood Meridian to its fans. I read some reviews, and also some of the furious comments left on negative reviews, and it seems like there are people for whom this type of writing is truly the epitome of beauty. That's fair. McCarthy does spend a long time on description. But it is just not for me.
I read passages like this and I get Nevernight vibes:
“The colt stood against the horse with its head down and the horse was watching, out there past men’s knowing, where the stars are drowning and whales ferry their vast souls through the black and seamless sea.”
It's an eye roll from me.
Also, I’m getting tired of authors who are just too intellectual and literary for punctuation. Great, you know how to not use speech marks and commas. I’m happy for you.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Blood Meridian.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 15, 2012
– Shelved
June 22, 2023
–
Started Reading
June 28, 2023
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-34 of 34 (34 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Zohal
(new)
Jun 29, 2023 02:43AM
I barely got through Blood Meridian and removed it from my read list. Like you said, the narration was so unengaging and distanced I couldn't comprehend anything that happened aside from scalps.
reply
|
flag
I despise this book! Never would have read it but for a lit class taught by a whippersnapper, grad student, David Foster Wallace fan boy when I returned to school to finish an abandoned degree.
I do recommend All The Pretty Horses by this author. It puts his beautiful writing on display without subjecting readers to pornographic levels of violence. And if you listen on audiobook the lack of punctuation disappears.
I do recommend All The Pretty Horses by this author. It puts his beautiful writing on display without subjecting readers to pornographic levels of violence. And if you listen on audiobook the lack of punctuation disappears.
i really enjoyed The Road but this sounds like a no for me. the punctuation thing drives me up a wall. it doesnt feel clever or interesting, it's frustrating and makes reading your book difficult for no reason!
Zohal wrote: "I barely got through Blood Meridian and removed it from my read list. Like you said, the narration was so unengaging and distanced I couldn't comprehend anything that happened aside from scalps."
Exactly. Some people said the book was hard to get through because it was so violent and disturbing, but I felt completely detached from the violence. McCarthy could have been describing steam-cleaning a sofa.
Exactly. Some people said the book was hard to get through because it was so violent and disturbing, but I felt completely detached from the violence. McCarthy could have been describing steam-cleaning a sofa.
Theo wrote: "I despise this book! Never would have read it but for a lit class taught by a whippersnapper, grad student, David Foster Wallace fan boy when I returned to school to finish an abandoned degree.
I ..."
I actually read All the Pretty Horses many years ago and can't remember it at all. I was probably too young for it, to be honest. I'll have to try it again.
I ..."
I actually read All the Pretty Horses many years ago and can't remember it at all. I was probably too young for it, to be honest. I'll have to try it again.
Alyssa wrote: "i really enjoyed The Road but this sounds like a no for me. the punctuation thing drives me up a wall. it doesnt feel clever or interesting, it's frustrating and makes reading your book difficult f..."
I agree. I tolerate it, but I've never felt it added anything but frustration and confusion.
I agree. I tolerate it, but I've never felt it added anything but frustration and confusion.
Jill wrote: "I’ve given very few books one star in my life, but this is one of them."
I did consider it.
I did consider it.
One of those authors who write for men who like to be seen reading more than they like actually reading
Amy wrote: "One of those authors who write for men who like to be seen reading more than they like actually reading"
😂 it's too true
😂 it's too true
I agree, I thought the writing was beautiful at times and I was interested in the strange monologues by the Judge, but it was too violent and I really shouldn’t have read it at 14. It’s a very dry book. I get people calling biblical, but I found it dense without purpose. I honestly only read it because a guy I liked didn’t stop talking about it… and my crush on him ended after I finished it LOL.
Wondering if you’ve read No Country for Old Men, by McCarthy? I found that much better than The Road …
Craig P. Lockhart wrote: "Wondering if you’ve read No Country for Old Men, by McCarthy? I found that much better than The Road …"
It's another one I've had on my list forever. I feel like I should read it, but I don't know if McCarthy's style is just one I should stay away from.
It's another one I've had on my list forever. I feel like I should read it, but I don't know if McCarthy's style is just one I should stay away from.
As someone who really likes McCarthy's style, I agree it's not everyone's cup of tea and tbh I think it's kind of dumb that people tout it as more 'intellectual' than other styles. I like the no-punctuation because it flows nicely when I read it, it makes me feel more connected to the story because it feels (to me) more like an ongoing internal monologue than words on a page. if you want to try McCarthy again I would not recommend The Road, but rather All the Pretty Horses. That said, I'd totally get it if you and McCarthy just don't vibe. Hell, I probably couldn't finish a Jane Austen book if you put a gun to my head.
Caitlin wrote: "As someone who really likes McCarthy's style, I agree it's not everyone's cup of tea and tbh I think it's kind of dumb that people tout it as more 'intellectual' than other styles. I like the no-pu..."
Yeah, I suspect it is just incompatibility with his style. I will have to try one more to see, but I've always had a problem with those rambling (to me, anyway) stream of consciousness narratives. I do enjoy an Austen but I like the darker feel of the Brontes most.
Yeah, I suspect it is just incompatibility with his style. I will have to try one more to see, but I've always had a problem with those rambling (to me, anyway) stream of consciousness narratives. I do enjoy an Austen but I like the darker feel of the Brontes most.
I find his writing to be beautiful, but often at the cost of clarity. While I did enjoy the book, I wouldn’t describe it as a pleasant read, and I agree with most of what was said in your review.
Hi Emily. Unrelated but are you going to read Emily Wilde's Encyclopaedia of Faeries? Although romance was timid, I found the faeries characterisation almost as good as Holly Black's
Agree. I do love No Country For Old Men though. I kept thinking about that book when I was doing other things during my day, and just wanted to spend all day reading it. This book though....it was a slog to get through. I kept putting it aside and starting other books. The way violence is written in this is so detached that I felt nothing while reading it, which i'm certain was the point. (But I see a lot of men on Goodreads saying that women don't like the book because they can't stomach the violence. It's like, in this desensitized world? 🤣 ) I just simply didn't care. Not about the characters, nor the goofy things they were going to do next- which involved a lot of spitting. SO MUCH spitting. I didn't even care to know what the ending was going to be. I just wanted it to end. Lol.
"Also, I’m getting tired of authors who are just too intellectual and literary for punctuation. Great, you know how to not use speech marks and commas. I’m happy for you." Love this!
I believe I've seen McCarthy saying he didn't want to dirty up the pages of his books with the "messy" punctuation or something like that, as if all letters and symbols aren't the exact same damn thing. Like, what makes a period "messier" than a quotation mark or a question mark?!
I believe I've seen McCarthy saying he didn't want to dirty up the pages of his books with the "messy" punctuation or something like that, as if all letters and symbols aren't the exact same damn thing. Like, what makes a period "messier" than a quotation mark or a question mark?!
McCarthy doesn't use the punctuation as a pure aesthetic reason, he thought punctuation marks made the page look messy. I actually agree and I would have a problem with it if the language was hard to follow, but it wasn't. He's not for everyone, that's for sure. If you haven't, read THE ROAD, very different (also grim) but quite a great read.
I’m on chapter 4 and I agree with you! I’m thinking to DNF this because I can’t get into it. The story seems interesting but the writing style puts me off cause half the time I have no it’s unclear what’s happening in the scene and I’ll have to read
comparing mccarthy's writing to jay kristoff's YA garbage feels contrarian. kristoff thinks he's someone like mccarthy.
Totally get what you mean. I understand that it's not for everyone. I think we all do, actually, so there's not anything I'd say that hundreds haven't. Though, I think the punctuation thing is kind of nitpicky. It's like not respecting a guitar player for not using a pick on an electric, or better yet, a sax player who uses a saxophone with blue lacquer. Sure, it sounds/looks a little different, but how much does it really change?
Eeeeeexactly!!
Ive never experienced a more gut wrenching, jaw dropping scene of pure awe than the first Apache attack of the unexpecting first mounted troop anywhere...And the description of the first encounter with The Judge in the middle of the desert by Captain Glanton's troop? Fogedaboudit!
UH!
MAY!
ZING!!!
Great review Emily!
Ive never experienced a more gut wrenching, jaw dropping scene of pure awe than the first Apache attack of the unexpecting first mounted troop anywhere...And the description of the first encounter with The Judge in the middle of the desert by Captain Glanton's troop? Fogedaboudit!
UH!
MAY!
ZING!!!
Great review Emily!
Fredrik wrote: "Your heart's desire is to be told some mystery. The mystery is that there is no mystery."
Freddy, are you talking about a Zen sutra, or a grimdark Faulkner knockoff?
Freddy, are you talking about a Zen sutra, or a grimdark Faulkner knockoff?
I really wish we could stop saying that Faulkner, Hemingway, and McCarthy are “men’s writers”. This is the same impetus that convinces women that reading about war “isn’t for them.” If you don’t like Faulkner, Hemingway (who wrote FAMOUSLY one of the most humanize female characters of the modernist period), or McCarthy—it’s not because they are “at the men’s table.” You simply do not like these three radically different writers. I wrote my PhD thesis on Faulkner. The Crossing made me sob openly and for days. I regularly teach Hemingway to college classes of multiple genders. These authors write about violence against oppressed and marginalized people—African Americans and Indigenous people for Faulkner; war veterans, especially traumatized female nurses, even a proto-trans character, poor Latin American people for Hemingway; Appalachian people, Indigenous people, and Mexican people for McCarthy. Men and women are parts of these groups. Blood Meridian is a novel about how savage and inhuman the Mexican American War was—the repercussions it had on those who both suffered it and served in it (Glanton for example.) Okay—so maybe you’re not persuaded by this discussion of human suffering. If you’ve managed to read any of McCarthy’s work without finding his passages of narration stunningly beautiful, though—I fear you don’t actually enjoy literature. “Long description of rocks and grass”—Jesus. Just admit you only enjoy YA and be done with it.
Chapters 4, 17 and 22 contain some of the most entrancing and vivid passages I’ve read. Ever. Also, as a person in a profession relying heavily on aesthetics I completely gravitate to the removal of punctuation and the redundancies of a thousand ‘…..she said.’ and the like. McCarthy is art in one of its highest forms.