Lori's Reviews > Wives and Daughters
Wives and Daughters
by
by
Oh. MY. WORD.
This is, in every sense of the phrase, the never-ending story.
I had been wanting to see the BBC's film version of this book for years, but never got around to it. In a story too complicated to explain, I was not able to get the video, so decided I'd try to read the book instead.
The book is 60 chapters long. SIXTY. 650 pages. The first two slow chapters made me return the book to the library. But the story kept nagging at me, so a few months later, I tried again. The story definitely becomes more interesting after chapter two.
But about 150 pages into the story, I was finally able to watch the video... and it was wonderful. With 150 pages of reading already invested, I decided I'd keep going. The movie proved that the story was a good one, and I was looking forward to additional information that books always seem to contain.
So on I went. And nearing the last few paragraphs of the sixtieth chapter, I started wondering why the story wasn't anywhere near its finish.
Let "A Note on the Text" from the last pages of the (35 page!!!) introduction speak to this:
"Wives and Daughters was first published in eighteen monthly parts in the Cornhill Magazine from August 1864 to January 1866. The Cornhill publishers, Smith and Elder, issued the novel in two-volume form at the end of serialization, Elizabeth Gaskell having died in 1865, just BEFORE COMPLETING THE STORY." (Emphasis mine.)
The Cornhill editor kindly TELLS the reader of what Gaskell intended to write in the sixty-first and final chapter. But it just isn't the same.
Thank you BBC for just writing the rest of the story into the screenplay.
And AAAARRRRGH! to myself - because if 650 pages isn't enough to qualify something as the never-ending story, the missing sixty-first chapter certainly is.
This is, in every sense of the phrase, the never-ending story.
I had been wanting to see the BBC's film version of this book for years, but never got around to it. In a story too complicated to explain, I was not able to get the video, so decided I'd try to read the book instead.
The book is 60 chapters long. SIXTY. 650 pages. The first two slow chapters made me return the book to the library. But the story kept nagging at me, so a few months later, I tried again. The story definitely becomes more interesting after chapter two.
But about 150 pages into the story, I was finally able to watch the video... and it was wonderful. With 150 pages of reading already invested, I decided I'd keep going. The movie proved that the story was a good one, and I was looking forward to additional information that books always seem to contain.
So on I went. And nearing the last few paragraphs of the sixtieth chapter, I started wondering why the story wasn't anywhere near its finish.
Let "A Note on the Text" from the last pages of the (35 page!!!) introduction speak to this:
"Wives and Daughters was first published in eighteen monthly parts in the Cornhill Magazine from August 1864 to January 1866. The Cornhill publishers, Smith and Elder, issued the novel in two-volume form at the end of serialization, Elizabeth Gaskell having died in 1865, just BEFORE COMPLETING THE STORY." (Emphasis mine.)
The Cornhill editor kindly TELLS the reader of what Gaskell intended to write in the sixty-first and final chapter. But it just isn't the same.
Thank you BBC for just writing the rest of the story into the screenplay.
And AAAARRRRGH! to myself - because if 650 pages isn't enough to qualify something as the never-ending story, the missing sixty-first chapter certainly is.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Wives and Daughters.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Lynne
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Aug 30, 2011 02:17PM
I just finished watching the lovely BBC movie, and was thinking about reading it, but worried about the whole author-died-while-writing it thing. Bad idea then??
reply
|
flag
Lynne wrote: "I just finished watching the lovely BBC movie, and was thinking about reading it, but worried about the whole author-died-while-writing it thing. Bad idea then??"
Well, I had a friend who saw the movie then read the book and enjoyed both, so maybe it would work for you. I just didn't like it, personally.
Well, I had a friend who saw the movie then read the book and enjoyed both, so maybe it would work for you. I just didn't like it, personally.
I just "finished" reading the book. I had watched the BBC mini-series and loved it and, like you, thought the book would be able to add something. I was nearing the end, thinking I was coming up on a thoroughly satisfying end, then nothing. There weren't any more pages. My digital copy didn't even come with the added explanation that you spoke of. I can't say I'm sorry I read it but I can't help but feel disappointed. I really wish that the publisher had contracted another author to add that 61st chapter. It may not have been exactly what Mrs. Gaskell had planned but it would have been something.
I watched the BBC version because it is almost impossible to find it in Spanish to read. And this book was originally a story that was published chapter by chapter. this explains why the plot in this stories changes all the time, just like in Dickens' novels, or North and South. I read Gaskell couldn't finish the story but she commented in a letter to a friend how she would like it to end, and that's what they did on the BBC production...
Thanks for the great review! I was getting bored with the audiobook and I've just downloaded the BBC version from Netflix. Everyone seems to love this, so I want to give it another try.
I'm twenty five and I completely agree, the wordcount made the story tedious when it could have been engaging.