Krys's Reviews > The Casual Vacancy

The Casual Vacancy by J.K. Rowling
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2798856
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: english-setting, long-length-book, fiction, own, third-person-narrative, read-in-2012, stand-alone



The Casual Vacancy = Mind Blowing.

There is a quote in J.K. Rowling's newly released book, The Casual Vacancy, that sums up the tone of this novel perfectly.


"The mistake ninety-nine percent of humanity made, as far as Fats could see, was being ashamed of what they were, lying about it, trying to be somebody else. Honesty was Fats' currency, his weapon and defense. It frightened people when you were honest; it shocked them. Other people, Fats had discovered, were mired in embarrassment and pretense, terrified that their truths might leak out, but Fats was attracted by rawness, by everything that was ugly but honest, by the dirty things about which the likes of his father felt humiliated and disgusted. Fats thought a lot about messiahs and pariahs; about men labeled mad or criminal; noble misfits shunned by the sleepy masses."


Rowling's departure from the world of children's fantasy takes us in an entirely different direction - truth. This book focuses on the truths that exist between people in a community and, more importantly, the lies that tear them apart.

The book starts with the death of Barry Fairbrother, a parish council member and much loved bloke about town. This leaves behind a casual vacancy - a much-sought-after spot on the town council. Barry's death shakes the town of Pagford to the foundation from the council to teens on his rowing team. Everyone has been affected. After his death Barry becomes the most omnipresent, oft-spoken-of-but-never-seen dead character since Rebecca haunted Manderley. Barry is a cause and a catalyst for everything that happens in this book.

This book has been much maligned in reviews. I have read a number that decry it as boring, laughable, and a waste of time. This made the defiant part of me rise up - everyone hates it, so I have to like it. Strike that, I have to love it. For the record it's not a waste of time. Not one second. I have spent the last week reading it and I feel nothing but pleasure, and aching, gut-wrenching sorrow in tandem. To call this novel boring is a slap in Rowling's face. This novel is heartfelt and exciting. At first it's a heavily character driven romp, but then the story sweeps you off your feet and you just can't look away. Rowling touches on so many factors of the human condition within the pages. Emotions range from sorrow to laughter, passion to pain, and all of the spectra in between.

I'm not sure what book the readers who claim it was boring were reading but, trust me, this wasn't it.

My theory is that the people who gave up are the fans that she acquired who are not readers - those who read the books because they are "the in-thing" so they could talk about it with their peers. Their contempt for this book makes me think they are jaded, that they feel duped for buying this (or any) book when "It's not Harry Potter!".

It's really their loss for giving up. They're missing an otherwise perfect literary experience.

On that note, if you go in expecting Harry Potter you will be disappointed. I never thought I would say this but forget Harry Potter... Especially while reading this book. Harry Potter ended five years ago and since then Rowling has gifted us with this unexpectedly wonderful book. To bemoan the fact that it's not another book set in that world is a second slap in her face. Rowling is a writer. Was she not supposed to write another book after finishing THE series of her career? Absolutely not. If anything she has a hell of a lot to prove... and she proves her chops in The Casual Vacancy. Where else would you find jealousy, illegal drug usage, prostitution, teenage sex, LGBT relationships, parental abuse, neglect, cutting, hope, pedophilia, boy band obsession, social politics, power struggles, rape, fear, betrayal, unrequited love, (and more f-bombs than Sam Jackson drops in the average movie)... all together told in a beautiful language that makes the reader laugh, smile, and cry at unexpected turns? Sometimes within sentences of one another.

Sound boring? It's not. Like I said, I don't know what book they were reading. I was completely riveted. And I sobbed at the end. Another truth.

Sadly, there is no mention of magic, or Hogwarts, or wizards, witches, and house elves. It didn't need that - it has it's own unique brand of magic. It doesn't mention Muggles either, but it does delve heavily into their lives and the way they interact with one another.

I am very impressed by Rowling's first adult book. It's literary, it's rough, it's blisteringly poignant. I will miss every single character.

5 out of 5 stars. Brava, Rowling. You have made magic out of the extraordinary ordinary. Brava.

- review courtesy of www.bibliopunkkreads.com
690 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Casual Vacancy.
Sign In »

Quotes Krys Liked

J.K. Rowling
“The mistake ninety-nine percent of humanity made, as far as Fats could see, were being ashamed of what they were, lying about it, trying to be somebody else. Honesty was Fats' currency, his weapon and defense. It frightened people when you were honest; it shocked them. Other people, Fats had discovered, were mired in embarrasment and pretense, terrified that their truths might leak out, but Fats was attracted by rawness, by everything that was ugly but honest, by the dirty things about which the likes of his father felt humiliated and disgusted. Fats thought a lot about messiahs and pariahs; about men labeled mad or criminal; noble misfits shunned by the sleepy masses.”
J.K. Rowling, The Casual Vacancy


Reading Progress

February 24, 2012 – Shelved
July 3, 2012 – Shelved as: english-setting
July 3, 2012 – Shelved as: long-length-book
July 3, 2012 – Shelved as: fiction
September 29, 2012 – Shelved as: own
October 5, 2012 – Started Reading
October 5, 2012 –
page 60
11.93%
October 6, 2012 –
page 102
20.28%
October 6, 2012 – Shelved as: third-person-narrative
October 7, 2012 –
page 180
35.79% "I've never seen any author use the word fucking so many times before. It's great!"
October 7, 2012 –
page 211
41.95% "Such a slow read, but I'm not bored yet. Which is a good thing."
October 8, 2012 –
page 268
53.28% "She just used my name in the text. That makes me feel as if this book was written just for me."
October 9, 2012 –
page 305
60.64%
October 10, 2012 – Shelved as: read-in-2012
October 10, 2012 – Finished Reading
November 9, 2012 – Shelved as: stand-alone

Comments Showing 1-50 of 78 (78 new)


message 1: by Sierra (new) - added it

Sierra Abrams Thank you so much for the review!!!! It gives me hope that i'll like it after all the negativity I've heard! And also good to know that theres rape and such like u mentioned...just so i can prepare myself..haha ;) great review!!


Krys Yearning To Read wrote: "Thank you so much for the review!!!! It gives me hope that i'll like it after all the negativity I've heard! And also good to know that theres rape and such like u mentioned...just so i can prepar..."

I felt a little spoilery giving it away, but I figured if you are like me you want to know ahead of time if there's something wicked this way coming. It's not a pretty read. But it's incredible.


Jessy (OCD Anonymous) you seriously amaze me.... it's like all you do is read, but yeah, thanks for this... i think Rowling did need to reinvent herself and i'm looking forward to seeing how


Krys Jesai wrote: "you seriously amaze me.... it's like all you do is read, but yeah, thanks for this... i think Rowling did need to reinvent herself and i'm looking forward to seeing how"

It's not all I do, but it's quite a lot of it. I work in a bookstore. This is my job after all. :)


Vivien You put into words exactly how I feel about this book. I absolutely loved it. A work of art.


Krys Vivien wrote: "You put into words exactly how I feel about this book. I absolutely loved it. A work of art."

It was fantastic! It's a shame that people are shying away from it because it's not Harry Potter. It was so well done, and the characters... fantastic. I wish I could read it again for the first time. I'm going to have to wait a while to reread it so I can get the surprise factor back. Hopefully. :)


Vivien Krys wrote: "Vivien wrote: "You put into words exactly how I feel about this book. I absolutely loved it. A work of art."

It was fantastic! It's a shame that people are shying away from it because it's not Har..."


This book is just a literary genius. The characters!!! Oh how I love to hate. I'd love to see English classes take this one on.


Krys This book is just a literary genius. The characters!!! Oh how I love to hate. I'd love to see English classes take this one on.

I think it would be a great book for classes. There's so much to discuss witht his one - so many social contexts. I think it would be a great book to tear apart.


message 9: by Des (new) - rated it 4 stars

Des I couldn't help but cackle at this "(and more f-bombs than Sam Jackson drops in the average movie)" Samuel L. Jackson is the king of f-bombs.

Very good review. I'm so happy when I read reviews that get this book. It's not for everyone and shouldn't be. I'm so tired of all the moaning and groaning: "it's boring", "it's not Harry Potter", "she should have stuck to fantasy"...Oh please.


message 10: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Desiree wrote: "I couldn't help but cackle at this "(and more f-bombs than Sam Jackson drops in the average movie)" Samuel L. Jackson is the king of f-bombs.

Very good review. I'm so happy when I read reviews th..."


Sam Jackson has a rival for f-bombery. 'Tis true.

The clientele at the bookstore I work at have been nothing but skeptical of this since it's release. I have been singing it's praises since I started it and they still look at me askance. They are dubious that I am trying to sell them a lemon, which is a shame, but it's nothing compared to the online complaints I have seen. Alright, I get it, it's not for everyone, but people giving up 50 pages in? Such a shame.


Vivien Krys wrote: "Desiree wrote: "I couldn't help but cackle at this "(and more f-bombs than Sam Jackson drops in the average movie)" Samuel L. Jackson is the king of f-bombs.

Very good review. I'm so happy when I..."


This was a book that the further along I read, the more I liked it. Once I got towards the end, I just fell in love. The writing is just phenomenal. It pisses me off that people aren't finishing this one.


message 12: by Krys (last edited Oct 14, 2012 06:00PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Krys wrote: "Vivien wrote: This was a book that the further along I read, the more I liked it. Once I got towards the end, I just fell in love. The writing is just phenomenal. It pisses me off that people aren'..."

It pisses me off that people are barely starting it.


Jessy (OCD Anonymous) Krys wrote: "Jesai wrote: "you seriously amaze me.... it's like all you do is read, but yeah, thanks for this... i think Rowling did need to reinvent herself and i'm looking forward to seeing how"

It's not al..."


I wish i owned a bookstore :(


message 14: by Krys (last edited Oct 15, 2012 03:29PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Jesai wrote: "I wish i owned a bookstore :( ..."

I just work in one. Owning one has it's problems I imagine. Working in one is fun. At times.


Jessy (OCD Anonymous) Krys wrote: "Jesai wrote: "I wish i owned a bookstore :( ..."

I just work in one. Owning one has it's problems I imagine. Working in one is fun. At times."


Goodreads doesn't have a like button (-_-);;;
hehehe


message 16: by Christina (new) - added it

Christina White I can't wait to read this!


message 17: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Christina wrote: "I can't wait to read this!"

It's SOOOOO good!!! Enjoy it!


message 18: by Lis (new) - rated it 4 stars

Lis Fantastic review! I pre-ordered it so it was delivered the day it came out, so I had no time for reading any of the already-existing review. Didn't know about the apparent negativity surrounding it until after I'd read it! I enjoyed it as much as you did! :)


Paige I read one review by someone who got 27 pages in and was like, "I think Rowling is totally immoral."

ARE YOU. FUCKING. KIDDING ME!!??!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!

This book is super duper good, and even though Harry Potter has been my favorite book for 14 years...I seriously think this one might be better. Jo is a huge talent. I'm so glad you think so too


message 20: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Paige wrote: "I read one review by someone who got 27 pages in and was like, "I think Rowling is totally immoral."

ARE YOU. FUCKING. KIDDING ME!!??!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!

This book is super duper good, and even t..."


That's absurd to me. Writing about sex and drugs isn't immoral. It's highlighting situations that may make people uncomfortable, sure. But immoral takes the criticism too far.


message 21: by Amy (new) - rated it 5 stars

Amy I will miss every single character as well. Rowling's insight into every character's mind and soul, even at their most despicable moments, was terrifyingly, humanly real. Terrifying in that I could identify with every character at at least one point, no matter how repulsive each could seem. She is incredibly brave to write this way, and I think it takes bravery on the part of an honest reader as well. Brilliant.


message 22: by Mimi (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mimi I'm glad you liked this book :) I felt like finding ppl who liked it were few and far between. I enjoyed it as well.


message 23: by Mimi (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mimi at least when it first came out. Now I suppose people other than "I loved Harry Potter and I'm gonna love this" have gotten to it (not that I don't also like Harry Potter)


message 24: by Jessica (new)

Jessica B Wow, you've definitely convinced me to read this!


Kaycee Thank you so much for your review. You expressed my feelings about this book much better than I could have. I listened to it and had a hard time getting involved with the characters because they were so unlikeable. But the farther we got into their lives, the more interesting it became for me. By the end, I had empathey for many and hatred for others. There is a lot to be said for an author who can generate those kinds of feelings in a reader.


message 26: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Congrats to Rowling for winning the best Fiction book in the Goodreads choice awards this year. YAY!!! It's well deserved.


message 27: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Vegan Krys wrote: "Congrats to Rowling for winning the best Fiction book in the Goodreads choice awards this year. YAY!!! It's well deserved."

I posted this on my review too. :-) I was happy with just a few of the winners; this was one of them.


Louise Clark Amen!


Mandy This review needs to be ranked first on the list. You've convinced me to give her book a read and you haven't given any major plot points away.


message 30: by Krys (last edited Dec 12, 2012 02:29PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Mandy wrote: "This review needs to be ranked first on the list. You've convinced me to give her book a read and you haven't given any major plot points away."

Yay! This is what I do for a living. *bookseller FTW!


Siobhan Your review pretty much says it all for me. I think the reason, however, that others have said it was boring is, if you remove the foul language and references to sex, the first 200 or so pages are more to bring you an idea of the characters, and there are a LOT of characters. Whereas in Harry her ensemble cast was given a front man, in the casual vacancy the closest she comes to that is Barry and Krystal. But one of my favourite books is we need to talk about Kevin and people talk about that in a similar way.

I found myself really responding to the characters. Howard was loathsome, Maureen vapid and Shirley naive, but oh, Sukhvinder had me in tears with her story, and Krystal, and I thought Arf was a little spineless at first, but then he grew in my estimation when he stood up to Simon. If Rowling can do anything, it's make you identify with her characters, since they're so rich and honest and believable.

I hate that this gets panned when it's beautifully crafted, whereas other, more crudely written books are more widely exalted. Rowling's a true talent.


message 32: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Siobhan wrote: "Your review pretty much says it all for me. I think the reason, however, that others have said it was boring is, if you remove the foul language and references to sex, the first 200 or so pages are..."

Can I like your comment, Siobhan? Because I do. In spades.


message 33: by Lisa (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa Vegan Siobhan, I agree with all you say in message 32.


message 34: by Rocío (new)

Rocío This review = my thoughts exactly


Rachael I finished reading this last night, it was brilliant, and I loved the fact that for most of it I forgot it was J.K that wrote it. Don't get me wrong, I love Harry Potter, but I was so ready to read something else from Rowling and she did not disappoint. I didn't realise people were shying away from the book, rather I thought, like myself, they'd be interested to see what else Rowling could do. Strange. Great review :)


message 36: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Rakel wrote: "I finished reading this last night, it was brilliant, and I loved the fact that for most of it I forgot it was J.K that wrote it. Don't get me wrong, I love Harry Potter, but I was so ready to read..."

Rakel, I think I have been noticing it more because I work in a bookstore and I have heard a lot of customer complaints about it. People have been returning it with the statement "I just couldn't get into it" as a defense. I haven't heard anything about people enjoying it so far except for reading positive reviews of it online. People are really divided.


message 37: by Martin (new)

Martin Garrod Not too sure whether your entry is meant to be a serious review of the book or a parody of a review. I will, therefore, assume you meant what you said and risk being told I have no sense of humour.

You said the quote, "sums up the tone of this novel perfectly" and I will assume that to be true because on this evidence alone I couldn't face reading it. You said that in your opinion the, "people who gave up are the fans that she acquired who are not readers" and on that you are quite clearly wrong. Obviously and plainly wrong. And a basic familiarity with some principles of English grammar should tell you why anyone who tried reading this would give up within a very few pages.

The quote you give reads like the clunky prose of a ten year-old child who has not yet learned how to use the verb to be. Look at the very first sentence, "The mistake ninety-nine percent of humanity made, as far as Fats could see, were being ashamed of what they were, lying about it, trying to be somebody else." Now take out the clauses to focus on the main point being made and we get, "The mistake ninety-nine percent of humanity made were trying to be somebody else." and it becomes obvious she has used the subjunctive when she should have used the singular past "was" to give us, "The mistake ninety-nine percent of humanity made was trying to be somebody else."

Call me a pedant if you like, but page after page of this sort of thing becomes very tiresome reading. Then seeing people who are not able to spot such gratuitous errors ascribing bad reviews to people not being "readers", and calling it a, "perfect literary experience" is, quite frankly, risible.


Paige Hey Martin, if you go to Amazon's page for this book and do the "search inside" feature (using the word "humanity," it is the first result), you'll see that Ms Rowling did indeed use the word "was" instead of "were," and that Krys just made a typo (believe it or not, it happens to the best of us from time to time).

You say you couldn't face reading it, but you also say that "page after page" of misused verbs made it tiresome reading, so I'm confused.

It sounds like you just didn't like it; but that doesn't mean that "anyone who tried reading this would give up within a very few pages"--a lot of people finished it, and a lot of them loved it; some of them also hated it. NBD. :)


message 39: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Totally my bad.


message 40: by Martin (new)

Martin Garrod @Paige : the logic works like this. Krys said the quote with the clunky verb summed up the novel perfectly. I said that based on this evidence I couldn't face reading it because, logically, if the quote was typical of the book there would be page after page of that stuff, and any "reader" (in the sense in which Krys used the word) encountering that would give up pretty quickly. My entire comment was based, as I said it was, on the evidence of Krys' quote, which, it turns out, summed up the novel only imperfectly. Thank you to you for pointing out his mistake and kudos to Krys for holding his hand up. Stuff happens.


message 41: by Krys (last edited Dec 21, 2012 05:21AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Thank you to you for pointing out his mistake and kudos to Krys for holding his hand up. Stuff happens. ..."

Pronouns, Martin. I'm a woman.


message 42: by Rob (new) - rated it 1 star

Rob Mango Indeed a spirited endorsement Krys.Must be reassuring to know your rebellious spirit is there to come to the defense when called upon and a defense is clearly required.
Yah Krys,Fats did have a few moments and the dysfunctional Weedon family sketch was an interesting bunch of loosers,but the tale lacked a sustaining composition in the end and it lacked mood throughout.It was neither fun nor informative,if you cant have that at least transportive to somewhere interesting.No ,not really.The town and people felt like the little model village in Beatleguise without the humor or surrealism. There was little to read for! Not twisted enough to be pathetic ,not absurd enough to be satire.The adjacent rich/poor town saga is a known to all,not inherently interesting .Obviously nobody gave a bleep about the guy who died.Her general empathy for the kids is redeeming i suppose but that is the sentiment that sustained the Potter dribble.Id rather watch re-runs of W.C Fields.Had the character sketches been better,if she had simply fashioned them more amusingly provide you with a few yuks or cringes,the whole thing may have worked.You are quite admirable though and so ...gallant,(and quite british) for standing alone.


message 43: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Rob wrote: "Indeed a spirited endorsement Krys.Must be reassuring to know your rebellious spirit is there to come to the defense when called upon and a defense is clearly required.
Yah Krys,Fats did have a fe..."


To each their own. I personally found many of the characters empathetic. Coming from a childhood with a background very close to one or two of the characters, though, may have done it for me. Many people do/did not enjoy this book. I did, and other people's non-enjoyment of it will not change my experience. The more I talk to people online and at the store I work at I see a very clear division with this one; you either LOVE it or feel 'meh' about it. I will remain one of the few who feel ardently about it though.


message 44: by Justjhen (new) - added it

Justjhen hi i agree this book must be really interesting!!! JKR has a totally different thing goin on in the story. I wish I could start reading this but all the bookstore in Oslo City doesnt have this its either not available or sold out... :(


message 45: by Cat (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cat Thank you for summing up not only my feelings on reading this book (Tears. TEARS of happiness) but also my feelings on the "readers" who've maligned and under-rated The Casual Vacancy, apparently because they are under the illusion that Harry Potter is the peak of all literature on the planet, so why even bother writing if house elves aren't going involved (Endless. Rage.) You have restored my faith in both people with eyes and people with the ability to comprehend the English language - thanks muchly.


message 46: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Catt wrote: "Thank you for summing up not only my feelings on reading this book (Tears. TEARS of happiness) but also my feelings on the "readers" who've maligned and under-rated The Casual Vacancy, apparently b..."

Shiny. I'm glad others feel the same way. I loved this book and it frustrates me when others find it boring.


message 47: by Kari (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kari Great review! I loved this book!


Doreen I will begin reading this book today. I like your review. I'm even more interested in the book, knowing that it covers human experiences in a truthful way. I like Fats already, I think. What a great quote! I understand what you wrote about those who jump on the bandwagon over the 'in things' at any given moment! Great if that works for them...doesn't work for me!


message 49: by Krys (new) - rated it 5 stars

Krys Doreen wrote: "I will begin reading this book today. I like your review. I'm even more interested in the book, knowing that it covers human experiences in a truthful way. I like Fats already, I think. What a ..."

I hope you enjoy it. Wait, that's not really the right word... I hope you get as much out of it as I did. :)


Doreen Krys wrote: "Doreen wrote: "I will begin reading this book today. I like your review. I'm even more interested in the book, knowing that it covers human experiences in a truthful way. I like Fats already, I ..."

Finished it...enjoyed it! I think it took a while for Rowlings to find her characters' true thoughts and voices, but when she finally did, well....excellent, thought-provoking story. And I agree, this would be perfect for English classes as a discussion tool because of the many social topics involved!


« previous 1
back to top