Chrissie's Reviews > The Friend

The Friend by Sigrid Nunez
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
632247
's review

liked it
bookshelves: audible-uk, fauna, humor, philo-psychol, life-stages, 2018-read, arts, nyc, fiction

I had too many problems with this book to give it more than three stars, but there is a twist at the end that I liked a lot. This turned the book around for me. In the story, a woman tells of a man who commits suicide. It is interesting to toy with the idea of who exactly is the friend in the title. I am not going to spoil the book by giving more away.

I do not think the GR book description accurately describes the book; it leads you in the wrong direction. The central focus is about the art of writing. Many references are made to authors, contemporary authors such as Svetlana Alexievich and Karl Ove Knausgårdand J.M. Coetzee to name but three, and many novelists, poets and playwrights of the past. Often this was simply name-dropping, but on other occasions that said was interesting. I particularly enjoyed the discussion of Rainer Maria Rilke’s Letters to a Young Poet written by Rilke when only twenty-seven. We are given a smattering of many different authors’ tips for good writing.

In the telling of the story we are in the head of the central protagonist. Thoughts are free-flowing, and this is at times confusing. Who is the “she” and the “he” and the “you” referred to? Names are not used—neither for the man who commits suicide nor his first, second or third wife. Given the style of writing and the absence of names, one does not come close to the characters.

There is a dog. Here we have a name; he is called Apollo. The writing about Apollo is perceptive and shows the author knows dogs well--how they move, how they nudge you with their nose, how they stare in your eyes, dance on their paws to draw your attention and speak to you. Yet very little in this book is actually about dogs! There are some statements about authors and their dogs.

The book has humor. One example is when Apollo is taken where dogs are not allowed. Questioned, the reply was that he was a service dog…….even if no badge declared him as such! How dare this even be questioned! “This dog is my emotional support companion.” I have told myself to remember that line.

The audiobook is very well narrated by Hillary Huber, but with some sections better than others. I particularly liked when the central protagonist is at her therapist. The final sections are better than in the beginning, maybe because as the book gathers strength and focus the reading does too.
44 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Friend.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 9, 2018 – Shelved as: to-read
February 9, 2018 – Shelved
February 9, 2018 – Shelved as: audible-uk
February 9, 2018 – Shelved as: fauna
February 10, 2018 – Shelved as: humor
February 10, 2018 – Shelved as: philo-psychol
February 23, 2018 – Shelved as: wishlist-f
February 23, 2018 – Shelved as: life-stages
February 25, 2018 – Started Reading
February 25, 2018 – Shelved as: own-unlistened
February 25, 2018 – Shelved as: 2018-read
February 26, 2018 – Shelved as: arts
February 26, 2018 – Shelved as: nyc
February 26, 2018 – Shelved as: fiction
February 26, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Donna Great review, Chrissie. I’m sorry a number of things about this book didn’t work for you. As you know, I had similar problems with it and wished it were more like the book’s summary. I’m glad you still enjoyed the humor and the parts with Apollo, and some of the literary discussions. I agree about the twist and the ending. I can still see it in my mind.


Chrissie Donna, you and I came to agree very much on this book. I find the book description very misleading. It was the twist at the end that made the book for me. I did like what there was about dogs.


message 3: by Lisa (new) - added it

Lisa Vegan Great review, Chrissie, and I'm glad you ended up liking it. It's on my list and I think that I *might* like it even more than you did.


Diane S ☔ Ditto what Lisa said, and I did like it a bit more than you.


Chrissie GR is rally goofed up,isn't it?! I am not getting any notifications of your comments. I just happened to stop by here and saw them. SO, if i do not answer somewhere, this is not my intention.

(((Patti)))

Diane, were you never confused by the free-flowing thoughts and the unclear usage of pronouns? I have this mania for needing to understand everything; I have difficulty waiting for information to clear. SOME of the details about the authors were very interesting, others bored me. When bored, it felt more like name-dropping.

Lisa, I know that I am terribly, terribly picky. The author does know dogs. I just wish there had been more focus on them.

Thank you, all of you, for liking my review. It does have interesting information and the ending makes you rethink what you have heard and is clever. Definitely a good book, but I did want more about dogs and was a bit annoyed that the book description misleads readers. I don't like being tricked, promised ont thing and given another. There is much more about writing than about dogs.......but the writing stuff was good too. The twist at the end is well done.


Chrissie I am dying to tell someone about the twist at the end but nobody asks........ First I put a html spoiler sentence in my my review but then I removed it. It is fun seeing what the author does yourself! I thought people might peek.


message 7: by Lisa (new) - added it

Lisa Vegan Chrissie, I want to read this book so I do not want to know the twist, even though I bet I will guess it and maybe even have guessed it. But I do not want to know.


Chrissie Lisa wrote: "Chrissie, I want to read this book so I do not want to know the twist, even though I bet I will guess it and maybe even have guessed it. But I do not want to know."

You have to tell me later if you guessed it right. It is clever. I did not guess it in the least. If you have guessed you are smart.


message 9: by Lisa (new) - added it

Lisa Vegan Chrissie, I'm thinking the reader is (view spoiler)


Chrissie No, not really. What you are saying though is general and could be used in many different ways. You have not read the book yet so you cannot possibly know. Only near the end do you (did I) begin to wonder about stuff you are told and then all is made clear. Cleverly done even after the twist is made clear. Given what you then know you must keep this in mind as the book continues. This I liked too.


message 11: by Lisa (new) - added it

Lisa Vegan Chrissie, Okay. Good to know. I think I would like this one if I can get to it. I'm reading so little these days and I read so slowly, which is frustrating for me.


Chrissie You have so much else on your plate!


message 13: by Lisa (new) - added it

Lisa Vegan Chrissie wrote: "You have so much else on your plate!"

Yes, and it's showing in my reading and in my participation here too. That's (sort of) okay. I just hope that some day in the not too distant future I'll be able to do more of both, and more.


Chrissie I understand.


Marybeth Can I ask how you 'name drop' an author when you're pulling his or her's material to either make a point or not at a philosophical level? it's not like she's saying she went shopping and out to dinner with these people.


Chrissie Paul Theroux is a perfect example of an author who does not "drop names". The authors and books HE mentions are those he has read and thought about. HE discusses what the books say, what is good and bad about them and how they are written. He speaks of each of the books or authors with depth. You are given adequate information so you can decide if the the book or author mentioned may be one yo want to try yourself.


back to top