ambyr's Reviews > God's War
God's War (Bel Dame Apocrypha, #1)
by
by
ambyr's review
bookshelves: acquiredㅡlibrary, authorㅡfemale, characterㅡlgbt, genreㅡdystopia, genreㅡscience-fiction, protagonistㅡmultiple-genders, westeros-superlative-sci-fi, book-club
Sep 19, 2011
bookshelves: acquiredㅡlibrary, authorㅡfemale, characterㅡlgbt, genreㅡdystopia, genreㅡscience-fiction, protagonistㅡmultiple-genders, westeros-superlative-sci-fi, book-club
Orson Scott Card talks a lot in his How to Write Science Fiction and Fantasy about exposition, and about how science fiction and fantasy readers react to it with different expectations than non-genre readers. Roughly summarized, his point is that if you open a story with, "She mounted her graazchak," an experienced genre reader will think, "Huh. Okay, there's a creature called a graazchak and it can be ridden. I'll keep that in mind, and keep an eye out for more information about what it looks like and what it does." Someone who mostly reads literary fiction, on the other hand, is likely to react, "A graazchak? What the hell is a graazchak? Does the author expect me to know?" and grind to a halt.
I am definitely an experienced genre reader, and I actively seek out that sense of "I don't know what's going on, but I'm sure I'll piece it together given time." God's War provides it, over and over again, from its politics to its bug-based tech to its characters' backstories.
In places, though, the exposition is a little too rough even for me. Sometimes it's small things, like the interchangeable use of "sister" for both Nyx's sister-by-birth and the other bel dames in the opening chapter. If they'd consistently been, oh, I don't know, "gene sisters" and "blood sisters," I would have noted the terms, assumed they'd be defined later, and forged onward. Instead, I found myself flipping backward, trying to work out whether there were two different categories at all. Other times it's bigger things, like the timeskip after the opening chapters, which left me feeling lost and unanchored in time; lacking any clearly defined markers, I couldn't see how Nyx and Rhys's timelines were supposed to align.
But I figured it out eventually, and once the story got going, the exposition got smoother. (Though there were a few places where it erred in the other direction with info dumps--Taite's backstory comes to mind here.) That let me spend more time admiring the uniqueness of the world and, more than anything, the characters. And I fell in love. Nyx, Rhys, Taite, Khos, Inaya--they are all horribly broken and horribly flawed, and I can't look away. I love that their flaws are not sexy flaws--no "too quick to anger in the face of injustice" or "a dark and brooding loner" here--and that the narrative never flinches from them, from Nyx's lack of intelligence (too many blows to the head from boxing?) and Rhys's cowardice and everything else.
I love this for not being the story of how they all set aside their differences and work together, but instead how their differences tear them apart and keep tearing. I love this for telling the story of star-crossed lovers--Nyx and Rhys--kept apart not by external forces but by their own internal beliefs, which they have no interest in moving beyond. I love this for being different, for being new, for never taking me where I expected.
Also the bugs are pretty nifty, and I say this as someone who shrieks and screams for back-up when she sees a spider on the kitchen floor.
I am definitely an experienced genre reader, and I actively seek out that sense of "I don't know what's going on, but I'm sure I'll piece it together given time." God's War provides it, over and over again, from its politics to its bug-based tech to its characters' backstories.
In places, though, the exposition is a little too rough even for me. Sometimes it's small things, like the interchangeable use of "sister" for both Nyx's sister-by-birth and the other bel dames in the opening chapter. If they'd consistently been, oh, I don't know, "gene sisters" and "blood sisters," I would have noted the terms, assumed they'd be defined later, and forged onward. Instead, I found myself flipping backward, trying to work out whether there were two different categories at all. Other times it's bigger things, like the timeskip after the opening chapters, which left me feeling lost and unanchored in time; lacking any clearly defined markers, I couldn't see how Nyx and Rhys's timelines were supposed to align.
But I figured it out eventually, and once the story got going, the exposition got smoother. (Though there were a few places where it erred in the other direction with info dumps--Taite's backstory comes to mind here.) That let me spend more time admiring the uniqueness of the world and, more than anything, the characters. And I fell in love. Nyx, Rhys, Taite, Khos, Inaya--they are all horribly broken and horribly flawed, and I can't look away. I love that their flaws are not sexy flaws--no "too quick to anger in the face of injustice" or "a dark and brooding loner" here--and that the narrative never flinches from them, from Nyx's lack of intelligence (too many blows to the head from boxing?) and Rhys's cowardice and everything else.
I love this for not being the story of how they all set aside their differences and work together, but instead how their differences tear them apart and keep tearing. I love this for telling the story of star-crossed lovers--Nyx and Rhys--kept apart not by external forces but by their own internal beliefs, which they have no interest in moving beyond. I love this for being different, for being new, for never taking me where I expected.
Also the bugs are pretty nifty, and I say this as someone who shrieks and screams for back-up when she sees a spider on the kitchen floor.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
God's War.
Sign In »
Quotes ambyr Liked
“Take me there. Or is this a kidnapping? Don't confuse rescue and kidnapping. I have not asked to be rescued.”
― God's War
― God's War
Reading Progress
September 19, 2011
–
Started Reading
September 19, 2011
– Shelved
September 22, 2011
–
0.0%
"I complain a lot about romantic sideplots in books. Some might think I'm never happy. So let me go on record: this is how you do it right, for me. This is what makes me happy. And oh, god, I am shipping the leads so hard."
September 24, 2011
– Shelved as:
acquiredㅡlibrary
September 24, 2011
– Shelved as:
authorㅡfemale
September 24, 2011
– Shelved as:
characterㅡlgbt
September 24, 2011
– Shelved as:
genreㅡdystopia
September 24, 2011
– Shelved as:
genreㅡscience-fiction
September 24, 2011
– Shelved as:
protagonistㅡmultiple-genders
September 24, 2011
– Shelved as:
westeros-superlative-sci-fi
September 24, 2011
–
Finished Reading
October 26, 2015
– Shelved as:
book-club
Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Justin
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Sep 21, 2011 09:56AM
I'm looking forward to seeing your thoughts on this. Given your interest in Infidel, I would assume you like it.
reply
|
flag
Very much so! There's a little first-novel roughness, but the bones are solid, and I'm looking forward to seeing how Hurley builds on them.
My major complaint was in the transition from early Nyx to post prison Nyx. It was rough. Infidel is a much more cohesive novel.
Yeah, it reminded me a bit of the beginning to McKinley's (otherwise very different novel!) The Hero and the Crown, which also has a timeskip so abrupt that I wasted time paging back and forth trying to figure out what the heck had just happened and whether I'd missed something.
it also took me a long time to figure out what was going on - this was very reassuring, that it's not just me, being dense or reading too fast. I'll probably reread it, just to see what's really there now that I have some context. I might look for the others at the library.
the violence didn't get to me (essential to the story, also in words rather than pictures), and I did appreciate the characters' mixed strengths & weaknesses.
the violence didn't get to me (essential to the story, also in words rather than pictures), and I did appreciate the characters' mixed strengths & weaknesses.