Lisa's Reviews > Regeneration

Regeneration by Pat Barker
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
32532774
's review

liked it
bookshelves: 1001-books-to-read-before-you-die

My experience with this World War I trilogy is bumpy, to say the least.

Starting by reading The Ghost Road without knowing it was the last in the series, I was not impressed. I have difficulties with historical fiction which mixes fictional characters with historical persons in a speculative interpretation of history. But considering the unfairness of judging a series after reading only the conclusion, I now embarked on the first one. Thus I find myself doing what Carol Ann Duffy did with the most famous Wilfred Owen poem: spinning history backwards.

The Last Post, by Carol Ann Duffy:

"In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking droning.
If poetry could tell it backwards, true, begin
that moment shrapnel scythed you to the stinking mud...
but you get up amazed, watch bled bad blood
run upwards from the slime into its wounds;
see lines and lines of British boys rewind
back to their trenches, kiss the photographs from home -
mothers, sweethearts, sisters, younger brothers
not entering the story now
to die and die and die
Dulce - No - Decorum - No - Pro patria mori
You walk away.
You walk away; drop your gun (fixed bayonet)
like all your mates do too -
Harry, Tommy, Wilfred, Bert -
and light a cigarette.
There's coffee in the square,
warm French bread
and all those thousands dead
are shaking dried mud from their hair
and queuing up for home. Freshly alive,
a lad plays Tipperary to the crowd, released
from History; the glistening, healthy horses fit for heroes, kings.
You lean against a wall,
your several million lives still possible
and crammed with love, work, children talent, English beer, good food.
You see the poet tuck away his pocket-book and smile.
If poetry could truly write it backwards,
then it would."

The problem is that it is not possible, really. History can't be unwritten, or rewritten.

And my issue with the third, Booker winning part of the series is accentuated and deepened by reading the first volume: I don't like this kind of historical fiction, and my dislike grows deeper with every novel I try. I prefer reading the authors who experienced the time themselves, thus giving authentic testimony, OR historians who keep to objective documentation, analysing the primary and secondary sources in their complexity and completeness, rather than through the lens of a biased fictional character, mingling with historical persons.

A mix of those two approaches is not for me.

So that leaves the question open: should I skip the middle? Having started with the end, then reluctantly moved backwards to the start, is it worthwhile to work my way through the action of the second in order to close the circle?

Or should I leave it wide open and read more Sassoon firsthand instead? The Poems Of Wilfred Owen, in the forwards direction, that is, I know almost by heart.

"Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs,
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots,
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of gas-shells dropping softly behind.

Gas! GAS! Quick, boys!—An ecstasy of fumbling
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time,
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling
And flound’ring like a man in fire or lime.—
Dim through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.

In all my dreams before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.

If in some smothering dreams, you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,—
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori."
44 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Regeneration.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

January 1, 2017 – Started Reading
February 16, 2017 – Shelved
February 16, 2017 – Shelved as: 1001-books-to-read-before-you-die
February 16, 2017 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-18 of 18 (18 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala I'm always glad to see your reviews in my updates, Lisa, because I know in advance that you will have come up with some new and creative approach to describing what you've read. These two poems match your experiences with this book perfectly.


message 2: by Violet (last edited Feb 16, 2017 04:19AM) (new)

Violet wells Interesting take on historical fiction, Lisa. I have to confess I rather enjoy a mischievous approach to history, probably because I'm quite sceptical about the existence of infallibly objective accounts in our history books. For example, we're rarely told what the women were doing while this or that battle took place. I also think it's one of the most testing challenges a writer can set herself, to imagine and bring to life a period of history she didn't experience. When it's done well, it's a marvel of daring and artistic licence. However I haven't read Pat Barker so can't comment on her success or failure in this regard.


Lisa Jean-Paul wrote: "Excellent and incisive review. Thank you, Lisa, as always, I learn a lot about literature I'm unfamiliar with from you."

Thank you, Jean-Paul! That is a reciprocal thing, and I love the way the maze opens up new directions all the time.


Lisa Fionnuala wrote: "I'm always glad to see your reviews in my updates, Lisa, because I know in advance that you will have come up with some new and creative approach to describing what you've read. These two poems mat..."

I love those poems. To me, they are like a symbol for literature and history, and their respective boundaries and expressions. The dialogue between poets, over a century apart, makes history come alive in literature, in a much more fulfilling way than in this novel.


Lisa Violet wrote: "Interesting take on historical fiction, Lisa. I have to confess I rather enjoy a mischievous approach to history, probably because I'm quite sceptical about the existence of infallibly objective ac..."

I absolutely agree with you that there is no guarantee for objectivity in history books. On the contrary. I just don't warm to historical fiction because I prefer the firsthand experience, both of the literature produced at the given time (in this case Owen and Sassoon) and of the historical sources the author must have read to be able to create her fiction.
Not sure I can explain it properly, and there are exceptions to the rule as well, if the purpose of the novel is not just to deliver an "account of history using all the right props and costumes, and namedropping the required celebrities", but to deliver more of a reflection on human society as a whole. I had a phase when I loved historical fiction, though. It might come back.


message 6: by Jan-Maat (new) - added it

Jan-Maat The Carol Ann Duffey reminds me of your friend Mr Vonegutt, Lisa, in his Slaughter house five when Billy watches the war film going backwards. Personally I found volume one better than volume two in this set, in any case after reading 2 of 3 and not loving them I'd advise cutting your losses. Once bitten twice shy, we say so twice bitten - find something else to read


message 7: by Violet (new)

Violet wells Yep, it's largely a taste thing. And I understand your reasoning. Contemporary understanding of, for example, Tudor England is probably now determined more by Philipa Gregory than learned historians.


message 8: by Violet (new)

Violet wells Actually that's a bad example because Gregory is a learned historian. But you know what i mean!


Lisa Violet wrote: "Actually that's a bad example because Gregory is a learned historian. But you know what i mean!"

Yes, I know exactly what you mean! And I certainly think historical fiction has its well-deserved place in literature, but I myself have some difficulties with it :-)


message 10: by Lisa (new) - rated it 3 stars

Lisa Jan-Maat wrote: "The Carol Ann Duffey reminds me of your friend Mr Vonegutt, Lisa, in his Slaughter house five when Billy watches the war film going backwards. Personally I found volume one better than volume two i..."

Yes, I'll move on. And I really must reread Slaughter House 5, I hardly remember it.


message 11: by Lisa (new) - rated it 3 stars

Lisa Violet wrote: "Yep, it's largely a taste thing. And I understand your reasoning. Contemporary understanding of, for example, Tudor England is probably now determined more by Philipa Gregory than learned historians."

Gregory is also a great author to introduce to adolescents when they make the move from children fiction to more advanced reading.


message 12: by Steve (new)

Steve I loved the poetic bookends: Duffy's hopeful whimsy contrasted with Sassoon's nightmarish reality. Personally, I am closer to your position on historical fiction. I prefer to read the witnesses and historians; but for periods I already know fairly well I also like to read the well imagined and executed historical novel. I just finished Mary Renault's Alexander trilogy and enjoyed it immensely.


message 13: by Lisa (new) - rated it 3 stars

Lisa Steve wrote: "I loved the poetic bookends: Duffy's hopeful whimsy contrasted with Sassoon's nightmarish reality. Personally, I am closer to your position on historical fiction. I prefer to read the witnesses and..."

I agree, Steve! It wouldn't be a good thumb rule if there weren't excellent exceptions to it!


message 14: by Violet (new)

Violet wells I've only read one Gregory novel but it impressed me - the vitality of her imagination and her contagious deep passion for her subject matter. She's also compelling whenever she's commenting on English history on TV. I really shouldn't have used her as my example!


message 15: by Lisa (new) - rated it 3 stars

Lisa Violet wrote: "I've only read one Gregory novel but it impressed me - the vitality of her imagination and her contagious deep passion for her subject matter. She's also compelling whenever she's commenting on Eng..."

She IS a good example for when it works. With Pat Barker, I am less sure.


message 16: by Lisa (new) - rated it 3 stars

Lisa Steve wrote: "I loved the poetic bookends: Duffy's hopeful whimsy contrasted with Sassoon's nightmarish reality. Personally, I am closer to your position on historical fiction. I prefer to read the witnesses and..."

Would you recommend the Renault Alexander trilogy to an adolescent, Steve? I am always looking for books for my kids!


message 17: by Kalliope (new) - added it

Kalliope I have only read one in the trilogy, I think... for some reason I did not proceed with the rest. I do like historical fiction but for some reason this did not click with me. Have you read those by Sebastian Faulks?


message 18: by Lisa (new) - rated it 3 stars

Lisa Kalliope wrote: "I have only read one in the trilogy, I think... for some reason I did not proceed with the rest. I do like historical fiction but for some reason this did not click with me. Have you read those by ..."

No, I haven't read those yet, Kalliope, but I am grateful for suggestions, both for myself and my kids! Thanks!


back to top