Lisa's Reviews > The Yellow Wallpaper
The Yellow Wallpaper
by
by
“He says that with my imaginative power and habit of story-making, a nervous weakness like mine is sure to lead to all manner of excited fancies, and that I ought to use my will and good sense to check the tendency. So I try.”
Read in conjunction with Ibsen’s A Doll's House, this short story takes a darker turn than the play, refusing to offer a way out of a dilemma in 19th century traditional society.
The story of a young married woman with an infant, who is patronised and controlled by her husband to the point of losing her sanity, is creepy, relevant, and not dated at all.
Two mindsets and worldviews clash.
On one side, there is the “rational husband”, a physician, who calls his wife “little girl” and forces her to passivity, as he claims agitation and stimulation are feeding her imagination in a detrimental way. He keeps her under surveillance, and she is asked to sleep and rest as much as possible, avoiding any kind of activity that can spark independent thoughts.
On the other hand, there is the young woman herself, with a strong wish to express herself creatively in writing, opposing the so-called benevolent dictatorship in secret, hiding her true feelings and thoughts in front of the husband, who is “very caring and loving, and hardly lets me stir without special direction”. And he “hates to have me write a word”.
The yellow wallpaper in her room becomes an obsessive symbol for the intellectual oppression the young woman experiences. It increasingly chokes her, until she lets go of her resistance and loses her sanity along with her hope to ever be able to live up to the limited version of life her prison guard is willing to grant her.
Her description of the yellow wallpaper is a mirror of her internal suffering, the contraction she feels and cannot solve. And it is an ominous sign of the only way she sees out of her hopeless dependency on a man who does not see her as a thinking human being, but rather as a decorative piece of furniture in his possession:
“It is dull enough to confuse the eye in following, pronounced enough to constantly irritate and provoke study, and when you follow the lame, uncertain curves for a little distance they suddenly commit suicide - plunge off at outrageous angles, destroy themselves in unheard of contradictions.”
The fight she puts up against the symbolical wallpaper makes one remember Oscar Wilde’s alleged last words: “My wallpaper and I are fighting a duel to the death. One or the other of us has to go.”
Behind the irony and wit, there is a sense of deadly pain in the face of lost beauty and aesthetic value. Whether or not Oscar Wilde spoke those words, he died just a couple of years after the publication of this short story, a broken man after years in prison which destroyed his spirit and will to create. He too was a victim of a dominant heterosexual, male society, which could accept no exceptions to their preferred way of living: in full control of all aspects of community, especially creative and sexual practices.
A Room of One's Own, so necessary to creative processes according to Virginia Woolf’s idea, turns into a prison if there is no freedom of thought and movement to feed imagination, and no financial independence to be able to make a choice. The room, supervised by "benevolent" authority, turns into a dystopian scenario in the spirit of Orwell.
Thoughtcrime and doublethink were well-known to intelligent, captive women long before "1984" named them properly.
Still readable, enjoyable, and thought-provoking! Recommended!
Read in conjunction with Ibsen’s A Doll's House, this short story takes a darker turn than the play, refusing to offer a way out of a dilemma in 19th century traditional society.
The story of a young married woman with an infant, who is patronised and controlled by her husband to the point of losing her sanity, is creepy, relevant, and not dated at all.
Two mindsets and worldviews clash.
On one side, there is the “rational husband”, a physician, who calls his wife “little girl” and forces her to passivity, as he claims agitation and stimulation are feeding her imagination in a detrimental way. He keeps her under surveillance, and she is asked to sleep and rest as much as possible, avoiding any kind of activity that can spark independent thoughts.
On the other hand, there is the young woman herself, with a strong wish to express herself creatively in writing, opposing the so-called benevolent dictatorship in secret, hiding her true feelings and thoughts in front of the husband, who is “very caring and loving, and hardly lets me stir without special direction”. And he “hates to have me write a word”.
The yellow wallpaper in her room becomes an obsessive symbol for the intellectual oppression the young woman experiences. It increasingly chokes her, until she lets go of her resistance and loses her sanity along with her hope to ever be able to live up to the limited version of life her prison guard is willing to grant her.
Her description of the yellow wallpaper is a mirror of her internal suffering, the contraction she feels and cannot solve. And it is an ominous sign of the only way she sees out of her hopeless dependency on a man who does not see her as a thinking human being, but rather as a decorative piece of furniture in his possession:
“It is dull enough to confuse the eye in following, pronounced enough to constantly irritate and provoke study, and when you follow the lame, uncertain curves for a little distance they suddenly commit suicide - plunge off at outrageous angles, destroy themselves in unheard of contradictions.”
The fight she puts up against the symbolical wallpaper makes one remember Oscar Wilde’s alleged last words: “My wallpaper and I are fighting a duel to the death. One or the other of us has to go.”
Behind the irony and wit, there is a sense of deadly pain in the face of lost beauty and aesthetic value. Whether or not Oscar Wilde spoke those words, he died just a couple of years after the publication of this short story, a broken man after years in prison which destroyed his spirit and will to create. He too was a victim of a dominant heterosexual, male society, which could accept no exceptions to their preferred way of living: in full control of all aspects of community, especially creative and sexual practices.
A Room of One's Own, so necessary to creative processes according to Virginia Woolf’s idea, turns into a prison if there is no freedom of thought and movement to feed imagination, and no financial independence to be able to make a choice. The room, supervised by "benevolent" authority, turns into a dystopian scenario in the spirit of Orwell.
Thoughtcrime and doublethink were well-known to intelligent, captive women long before "1984" named them properly.
Still readable, enjoyable, and thought-provoking! Recommended!
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Yellow Wallpaper.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 7, 2017
–
Started Reading
February 8, 2017
– Shelved
February 8, 2017
– Shelved as:
1001-books-to-read-before-you-die
February 9, 2017
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-33 of 33 (33 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Sunny
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Feb 08, 2017 11:44PM
Interesting description. Reminds me a bit of the suffocation the protagonist felt in Christina stead's the man who loved children.
reply
|
flag
I read your review and stare at the book cover and feel that oppression in my bones... Nuanced review that sounds too familiar. Plus I love it that you bring V. Woolf so often in your review, Lisa...
this is a heart breaking read, but so worth the heart break. I have a copy that I reread every few years.
Dolors wrote: "I read your review and stare at the book cover and feel that oppression in my bones... Nuanced review that sounds too familiar. Plus I love it that you bring V. Woolf so often in your review, Lisa..."
Thank you Dolors! I haven't thought of it myself, but now you mention it I realise that I measure a lot of my reading against Virginia Woolf. She is my point of reference quite often.
I am following a thread of women's rights in my reading at the moment.
Thank you Dolors! I haven't thought of it myself, but now you mention it I realise that I measure a lot of my reading against Virginia Woolf. She is my point of reference quite often.
I am following a thread of women's rights in my reading at the moment.
Ivana wrote: "this is a heart breaking read, but so worth the heart break. I have a copy that I reread every few years."
Yes, it is well worth exploring many times, Ivana. I agree!
Yes, it is well worth exploring many times, Ivana. I agree!
Oscar Wilde wasn't he the victim of his own arrogance and belief in his own brilliance? Attempting to sue somebody for defamation of character when you know that what they have said is both true and provable, particularly when as a well known wit he could presumably have laughed off the comments of a well known drunk with a bon mot or two was hardly wise. Somewhat different to the unfortunate and infantalised heroine you describe
Jan-Maat wrote: "Oscar Wilde wasn't he the victim of his own arrogance and belief in his own brilliance? Attempting to sue somebody for defamation of character when you know that what they have said is both true an..."
The circumstances of how they got into conflict with a prejudiced and oppressive dominant society are certainly different, but the effect was quite similar.
The Suffragettes certainly knew as well what they were up to when they committed acts that sent them to prison. But without the massive movement, they might have had to wait much longer than 1918 for their voting rights. Homosexuality was not decriminalised in Britain until half a century later, despite posing much less of an actual threat to male heterosexual dominance than voting rights for women.
I think Oscar Wilde hugely miscalculated the bullying power of Bosie's father, in conjunction with the discriminating law.
He probably believed until the end that it was a joke. But he was broken by the consequences, nonetheless, as expressed in his Ballad Of Reading Gaol:
“Yet each man kills the thing he loves,
By each let this be heard,
Some do it with a bitter look,
Some with a flattering word,
The coward does it with a kiss,
The brave man with a sword!
Some kill their love when they are young,
And some when they are old;
Some strangle with the hands of Lust,
Some with the hands of Gold:
The kindest use a knife, because
The dead so soon grow cold.
Some love too little, some too long,
Some sell, and others buy;
Some do the deed with many tears,
And some without a sigh:
For each man kills the thing he loves,
Yet each man does not die.”
The circumstances of how they got into conflict with a prejudiced and oppressive dominant society are certainly different, but the effect was quite similar.
The Suffragettes certainly knew as well what they were up to when they committed acts that sent them to prison. But without the massive movement, they might have had to wait much longer than 1918 for their voting rights. Homosexuality was not decriminalised in Britain until half a century later, despite posing much less of an actual threat to male heterosexual dominance than voting rights for women.
I think Oscar Wilde hugely miscalculated the bullying power of Bosie's father, in conjunction with the discriminating law.
He probably believed until the end that it was a joke. But he was broken by the consequences, nonetheless, as expressed in his Ballad Of Reading Gaol:
“Yet each man kills the thing he loves,
By each let this be heard,
Some do it with a bitter look,
Some with a flattering word,
The coward does it with a kiss,
The brave man with a sword!
Some kill their love when they are young,
And some when they are old;
Some strangle with the hands of Lust,
Some with the hands of Gold:
The kindest use a knife, because
The dead so soon grow cold.
Some love too little, some too long,
Some sell, and others buy;
Some do the deed with many tears,
And some without a sigh:
For each man kills the thing he loves,
Yet each man does not die.”
Lisa, I disagree deeply, Wilde was a Jeffrey Archer. The suffragettes were often brave but deeply silly and wildly successful publicists, votes for women in Britain were delayed purely due to the internal politics of the Liberal party to which they could offer no solution, short of (subtly) assassinating Asquith maybe, and what about the sufferagists? Don't forget them in favour of a small radical splinter group?
(view spoiler)
(view spoiler)
Jan-Maat wrote: "Lisa, I disagree deeply, Wilde was a Jeffrey Archer. The suffragettes were often brave but deeply silly and wildly successful publicists, votes for women in Britain were delayed purely due to the i..."
I agree with you that Wilde was not acting wisely, but that is not what I was comparing. I was comparing the effect of suppression and imprisonment. Of course the circumstances are different.
I don't know enough about Jeffrey Archer to be able to compare those two cases. But Oscar Wilde went to jail for his sexual orientation?
As for the women's rights movement, I also agree that the suffragettes may have acted in a silly, even counterproductive way sometimes, and stolen the show from a wider, more balanced movement, but that is the natural spread in a movement involving so many different people with different means and cultural backgrounds? They surely felt the consequences much harder than the corresponding extreme parts of the conservative movement against them? As did Oscar Wilde. He felt the consequences of his actions bitterly, after not taking the reality of his situation seriously at all in the beginning.
My point was to compare the psychological effects of depriving people of their freedom of (sexual, social) choice and natural way of living.
Brilliance and madness often coincide, as discussed in another thread recently? And sometimes, political movements are accelerated through loud and silly action - for better and for worse (view spoiler)
I agree with you that Wilde was not acting wisely, but that is not what I was comparing. I was comparing the effect of suppression and imprisonment. Of course the circumstances are different.
I don't know enough about Jeffrey Archer to be able to compare those two cases. But Oscar Wilde went to jail for his sexual orientation?
As for the women's rights movement, I also agree that the suffragettes may have acted in a silly, even counterproductive way sometimes, and stolen the show from a wider, more balanced movement, but that is the natural spread in a movement involving so many different people with different means and cultural backgrounds? They surely felt the consequences much harder than the corresponding extreme parts of the conservative movement against them? As did Oscar Wilde. He felt the consequences of his actions bitterly, after not taking the reality of his situation seriously at all in the beginning.
My point was to compare the psychological effects of depriving people of their freedom of (sexual, social) choice and natural way of living.
Brilliance and madness often coincide, as discussed in another thread recently? And sometimes, political movements are accelerated through loud and silly action - for better and for worse (view spoiler)
Reading your insightful thoughts, Lisa, I suffered with all the women that were locked in this kind of prison. Excellent review. L.
They both went to prison for lying. The suffragette story is a model you are right we see it repeated time and again that division between capturing space in public discourse through radical action (at the risk of alienating some support), and quiet mass movements that struggle to show progress and the suffragettes were unlucky in that the Home rule debate in Ireland was drifting towards civil war & there were wars in the Balkans they had to be very dramatic to get column inches. I don't think your examples were comparable except in the broad sense that if we were all kind to ourselves and each other than society would be kind and quelle suprise when we aren't it isn't. Wilde dragged himself into a position were he forced people to be extremely aware he was flouting the law - true an unkind, unwise law, but for goodness sake he was also going to brothels for gay sex - ie there was plenty of homosexuality/bisexuality tolerated in late Victorian Britain if you were rich and privileged and didn't shout about it.
Thanks for introducing me to this author whom I'd never heard of, Lisa. I really like that quote about the wallpaper - those 'uncertain curves' which suddenly commit suicide! Wallpaper patterns repeating themselves over and over have always been something I've detested - and exactly for the way they used to break off just to restart. Fortunately wallpaper manufacturers have got a lot cleverer in disguising the point where the pattern repeats ...though I still dislike wallpaper intensely.
Sunny wrote: "Interesting description. Reminds me a bit of the suffocation the protagonist felt in Christina stead's the man who loved children."
I haven't read that book, Sunny, but I will be happy to give it a try!
I haven't read that book, Sunny, but I will be happy to give it a try!
Jean-Paul wrote: "I loved Wilde's alleged last words; I have the same relationship with the bars outside my window at work. ;-)"
I can't count the times when my sense of beauty clashes with reality. I still mourn every time I think of the architectural disaster of the 1960s in Stockholm, when they began demolishing huge parts of the traditional city centre to create a grey cement desert for shopping with cars circulating around it in a maze of ugliness. But it won't go away.
I can't count the times when my sense of beauty clashes with reality. I still mourn every time I think of the architectural disaster of the 1960s in Stockholm, when they began demolishing huge parts of the traditional city centre to create a grey cement desert for shopping with cars circulating around it in a maze of ugliness. But it won't go away.
Lizzy wrote: "Reading your insightful thoughts, Lisa, I suffered with all the women that were locked in this kind of prison. Excellent review. L."
Thank you, Lizzy! The scary thing about this story is the role of the husband: he is so condescendingly friendly, yet blind and rigid, it feels impossible to argue against his mindset - being so "rational". Yet he not once considers his wife's ideas to be worth reflecting on. It is a scarily "everyday" violation of women's rights. "Nothing to shout about", just domestic authority against female overexcited whim. I almost felt nauseous while reading.
Thank you, Lizzy! The scary thing about this story is the role of the husband: he is so condescendingly friendly, yet blind and rigid, it feels impossible to argue against his mindset - being so "rational". Yet he not once considers his wife's ideas to be worth reflecting on. It is a scarily "everyday" violation of women's rights. "Nothing to shout about", just domestic authority against female overexcited whim. I almost felt nauseous while reading.
I didn't know Wilde had such a sad life, you would never guess it from his works. Wonderful review, Lisa.
Fionnuala wrote: "Thanks for introducing me to this author whom I'd never heard of, Lisa. I really like that quote about the wallpaper - those 'uncertain curves' which suddenly commit suicide! Wallpaper patterns rep..."
It is funny, you confirm exactly what I feel myself. It has always annoyed me to see that strange, abrupt cut, and the repetitive patterns. I felt absurdly relieved when I read Muriel Spark's The Driver's Seat and Lise defied all conventional combinations of patterns. I thought that was both hilarious and revolutionary...
It is funny, you confirm exactly what I feel myself. It has always annoyed me to see that strange, abrupt cut, and the repetitive patterns. I felt absurdly relieved when I read Muriel Spark's The Driver's Seat and Lise defied all conventional combinations of patterns. I thought that was both hilarious and revolutionary...
Jan-Maat wrote: "They both went to prison for lying. The suffragette story is a model you are right we see it repeated time and again that division between capturing space in public discourse through radical action..."
I guess you are right that people can do whatever they want in any society as long as they are privileged, have money and connections and know how to keep quiet.
In that respect, Wilde certainly was not very clever. But that is part of his charm, in my opinion. I read most of both the libel and the two criminal trials a couple of years ago, being absolutely infatuated with his writing, and I know he triggered the libel trial, as he thought Queensberry's harassment was about to destroy his life (which may have been an exaggeration, but there certainly were threats). He was completely deluded to think the evidence would not speak against him.
However, then he got the warrant and had to decide whether to leave the country before being charged with gross indecency, and I sympathise with his naive hesitancy and his belief that it would be solved. The ordeal he was put through after that (the two criminal trials for "gross indecency", the sentence and the two years in prison) broke his spirit, in any case.
I guess you are right that people can do whatever they want in any society as long as they are privileged, have money and connections and know how to keep quiet.
In that respect, Wilde certainly was not very clever. But that is part of his charm, in my opinion. I read most of both the libel and the two criminal trials a couple of years ago, being absolutely infatuated with his writing, and I know he triggered the libel trial, as he thought Queensberry's harassment was about to destroy his life (which may have been an exaggeration, but there certainly were threats). He was completely deluded to think the evidence would not speak against him.
However, then he got the warrant and had to decide whether to leave the country before being charged with gross indecency, and I sympathise with his naive hesitancy and his belief that it would be solved. The ordeal he was put through after that (the two criminal trials for "gross indecency", the sentence and the two years in prison) broke his spirit, in any case.
Sidharth wrote: "I didn't know Wilde had such a sad life, you would never guess it from his works. Wonderful review, Lisa."
Thank you, Sidharth! Most of Wilde's work was produced before his trial and two years in prison. He died a few years after that. He wrote a long ballad reflecting on his time in prison, though, which I think is very beautiful.
Thank you, Sidharth! Most of Wilde's work was produced before his trial and two years in prison. He died a few years after that. He wrote a long ballad reflecting on his time in prison, though, which I think is very beautiful.
Eleanor wrote: "Great review and interesting discussion Lisa - thank you. I shall seek this one out."
Thank you, Eleanor! I think you will enjoy it. Very multilayered, despite being a very short read.
Thank you, Eleanor! I think you will enjoy it. Very multilayered, despite being a very short read.
I think I read this many years ago. It also sounds slightly like The Victorian Chaise Longue, which is well worth reading.
Jean-Paul wrote: "I loved Wilde's alleged last words; I have the same relationship with the bars outside my window at work. ;-) "
You have windows? You're lucky! My office has one patch of corrugated plastic that is semi-opaque to let in a smidgen of light.
(Are you familiar with Monty Python's Four Yorkshiremen sketch?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1...)
You have windows? You're lucky! My office has one patch of corrugated plastic that is semi-opaque to let in a smidgen of light.
(Are you familiar with Monty Python's Four Yorkshiremen sketch?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1...)
Cecily wrote: "I think I read this many years ago. It also sounds slightly like The Victorian Chaise Longue, which is well worth reading."
Thank you for the suggestion, Cecily! I just read your review, and I think it has several similarities. I will definitely give it a try!
Thank you for the suggestion, Cecily! I just read your review, and I think it has several similarities. I will definitely give it a try!
Cecily wrote: "Jean-Paul wrote: "I loved Wilde's alleged last words; I have the same relationship with the bars outside my window at work. ;-) "
You have windows? You're lucky! My office has one patch of corruga..."
Cecily, I just spent several minutes laughing out loud at that sketch! Thank you for sharing. Monty Python are the best medicine for world ennui!
You have windows? You're lucky! My office has one patch of corruga..."
Cecily, I just spent several minutes laughing out loud at that sketch! Thank you for sharing. Monty Python are the best medicine for world ennui!
I'm so pleased. The best of Python is... the best. (But there's a lot of material that's rarely seen, and best left that way.)
Cecily wrote: "I've now reread this story, so appreciate your review all the more."
Happy to hear that, Cecily! I liked your review of it a lot. I think it is one of those short stories that contain a universal, timeless truth.
Happy to hear that, Cecily! I liked your review of it a lot. I think it is one of those short stories that contain a universal, timeless truth.