Carbon Dioxide Emission from Soil

Agric Res (June 2013) 2(2):132–139 DOI 10.1007/s40003-013-0061-y FULL-LENGTH RESEARCH ARTICLE Carbon Dioxide Emission from Soil Md. Mizanur Rahman Received: 7 October 2012 / Accepted: 2 April 2013 / Published online: 21 April 2013 Ó NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Sciences) 2013 Abstract Global warming and climate change are a cause for great concern demanding intensive research on CO2 emission from soil under different management options. Therefore, a pot experiment was conducted using 0.25 g C 100 g-1 soil from rice straw, rice root, cowdung, and poultry manure to quantify CO2 emission under alternate wetting and drying and continuously moist conditions. The maximum emission was recorded during the first week of incubation and after 3 weeks, it came down sharply and finally approached almost zero to 5 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 irrespective of organic materials and water management. Among the organic materials, cowdung released less CO2 and increased carbon content in soil. During 118 days of incubation, cumulative emissions were 158, 313, 366, 283, 576 mg CO2 100 g-1 from soil, soil plus rice straw, soil plus rice roots, soil plus cowdung, and soil plus poultry manure, respectively. Alternate wetting and drying condition released more CO2 than that under continuously moist condition. Application of cowdung in agriculture can restrict CO2 emission. From the findings it could be apprehended that before application to soil, composting of organic materials through anaerobic digestion might be the best option to reduce CO2 emission, and thus help mitigate global warming. Keywords Carbon dioxide emission  Cowdung  Poultry manure  Rice straw  Rice roots Introduction Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an important greenhouse gas accounting for 60 % of the total greenhouse effect [17]. It is well known that vegetation and soils are major storage sinks of atmospheric CO2 [4]. In the last few decades, there has been an increase in the emission of naturally occurring greenhouse gases like CO2, methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). These gases trap outgoing infrared radiation from the earth’s surface. Human health, terrestrial and aquatic ecological systems, agriculture, forestry, fisheries, and water resources are sensitive to changing climate. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased from 280 ppmv at beginning of the industrial revolution to the Md. M. Rahman (&) Department of Soil Science, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh e-mail: [email protected] 123 present day value of 391 ppmv [25]. This increase is attributed to the anthropogenic activities like agriculture and land use changes, burning of fossil fuel, deforestation, emission from automobiles, forest fires, etc. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is of paramount importance with respect to availability of plant nutrients and improvement of physical, chemical, and biological properties of soils [9]. Maintenance of SOC is essential for the sustainable agricultural production as declining soil C generally decreases crop productivity [11]. The SOC pool in agricultural lands is capable of enhancing agricultural sustainability and serving as a potential sink of atmospheric CO2 [5]. Carbon stocks are not only critical for the soil to perform its productivity and environmental functions but also play an important role in the global C cycle. Soil C sequestration can improve soil quality and reduce the contribution of agriculture to CO2 emissions. Concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has been increasing at the rate of 3.2 9 1015 g C year-1 [6], where Agric Res (June 2013) 2(2):132–139 the contribution of agriculture and land use change is 20 % [10]. To offset climate change, the emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases must be reduced. The rate of soil carbon emission is strongly regulated by the amount and types of organic materials added to soil and the complex interaction among soil physical, chemical, and biological processes and environmental conditions like temperature, alternate wetting and drying, etc. [1, 12]. Carbon dioxide is released from the soil through soil respiration, where soil microflora contributes 99 % of the CO2 arising from decomposition of organic matter under alternate wetting and drying and flooded conditions. Soil aerobic conditions produce CO2, while anaerobic conditions produce CH4 depending on the concentration of SOC. Large quantities of organic carbon added to soils through different manures and wastes to supply plant nutrients may significantly contribute to CO2 emission. However, proper management of organic manures and wastes, conservation tillage, microaggregation, and mulching can play an important role in reducing CO2 emission, and thus increase C sequestration in soil [19]. The global concerns about the effect of climate change demand intensive research on carbon cycling, its transformation under different crops, soil and water management practices, and stability of carbon compounds in soils [16]. Emission of CO2 from the soil results in lessening of soil organic pool, and thus exerts effects on soil structure, soil fertility, and productivity. Therefore, reducing CO2 emission through carbon sequestration in the soil is of prime importance. Scarce information on CO2 emission from various organic residues and manures under different water management practices has forced us to carry out the research. It was hypothesized that emission of CO2 may vary with the types of organic residues added to soil and water management options. The objectives of the research were to determine the rates of CO2 emission from added organic materials in soils under alternate wetting and drying and continuously moist conditions and to identify the organic material which restricts CO2 emission in soil. Materials and Methods The experiment was conducted in the laboratory of Soil Science, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Bangladesh during May– August 2011. Study Soils and Organic Materials Used The soil used in the study was collected from the experimental farm of the BSMRAU located at 24.09° north latitude and 90.26° east longitude with an elevation of 8.4 m from the mean sea level, which is classified as shallow red 133 brown terrace soil and inceptisols as Bangladesh and USDA classification system, respectively. The soil is under the agro-ecological zones of Madhupur Tract, which is acidic in nature having pH 6.0 and low in organic carbon (0.34 %). After collection of soil, it was air dried and ground to a suitable label for using in the experiment. The organic materials used in the study were rice straw, rice roots, cowdung and poultry manure. Before starting the experiment, soil and above mentioned organic residues and manures were analyzed for total nitrogen and organic carbon (Table 1). Carbon contents in rice straw were the highest (40 %) followed by rice roots, poultry manure, and cowdung. Carbon contents in rice straw were almost double over that of poultry manure. Treatments and Design It was a two-factorial (residues 9 water management) experiment laid out in a randomized complete block design with two replications using rice straw, rice roots, cowdung, and poultry manure as a source of C at the rate of 0.25 g C 100 g-1 soil. Exactly 100 g air-dried soil was used in 1,100-ml-sized 36 airtight plastic pots. Residues were added to plastic pots as per C rates and mixed well with soil. The residues were control (soil); soil ? rice straw; soil ? rice root; soil ? cowdung; soil ? poultry manure; rice straw; rice root; cowdung; and poultry manure, while water management options were alternate wetting and drying and continuously moist conditions. The plastic pots along with residues and soil were incubated at a temperature of 24 °C, which was maintained from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. throughout the experimental period through an air condition. Carbon Dioxide Emission Measurement Carbon dioxide emission was measured by a standard method [7]. The study was conducted for 120 days (4 months). During the first 2 months, carbon dioxide emission was measured twice a week and the next 2 months once a week. A CO2 trap was prepared using Table 1 Moisture, total nitrogen, carbon contents, and C:N ratio of residues and manure used in the experiment (mean ± SD) Residues Moisture content (%) Total nitrogen OC (%) (%) C:N ratio Cowdung 40.23 ± 2.18 1.22 ± 0.10 18.50 ± 0.21 15.16 Poultry manure 21.16 ± 3.14 2.09 ± 0.15 20.21 ± 0.42 Rice straw 15.34 ± 1.76 0.44 ± 0.08 40.17 ± 0.15 91.30 Rice root 15.21 ± 1.33 0.38 ± 0.10 32.37 ± 0.20 85.18 9.66 123 134 mg CO2 d-1 kg -1 soil (a) 12 10 8 Soil-AWD Soil-CM Soil-RS-AWD Soil-RS-CM Soil-RR-AWD Soil-RR-CM 6 4 2 0 4 12 20 28 36 44 52 60 70 82 94 106 118 70 82 94 106 118 Days of incubation (b) 30 mg CO2 d-1 kg-1 soil Fig. 1 Carbon dioxide emission from organic residues under alternate wetting and drying and moist conditions, a soil, soil plus rice straw, and soil plus rice roots, b soil plus cowdung and soil plus poultry manure, c rice straw, rice roots, cowdung, and poultry manure AWD alternate wetting and drying, CM continuously moist, CD cowdung, PM poultry manure, RS rice straw, RR rice root Agric Res (June 2013) 2(2):132–139 25 20 15 Soil-CD-AWD Soil-CD-CM Soil-PM-AWD Soil-PM-CM 10 5 0 4 12 20 28 36 44 52 60 (c) 35 mg CO2 d-1 kg -1 soil Days of incubation 30 25 20 RS-AWD RR-AWD CD-AWD PM-CM RS-CM RR-CM CD-CM PM-AWD 15 10 5 8 11 6 10 94 82 70 60 52 44 36 28 20 12 4 0 Incubation days NaOH solution (20 ml 1.0 N NaOH ? 25 ml distilled water) in vial for trapping CO2. The trap solution in a beaker was placed in the air-tight plastic pots of the experiment. For first 2 months after 4 days of exposure and the next 2 months after 7 days of exposure, the alkali beakers were removed and titrated with 0.1 N HCl solution using phenolphthalein indicator and BaCl2 solutions. Controls for this experiment consist of plastic pot without soil and residues but with the alkali of same strength was used. The alkali solutions from the control and those exposed to soil air were titrated to determine the quantity of alkali that has not reacted with CO2. For this purpose, excess BaCl2 was added to the NaOH solution to precipitate the carbonate as insoluble BaCO3. A few drops of phenolphthalein were added as indicator, and titrated with 0.1 N HCl directly in the beaker. The acid was added 123 slowly to avoid contact with possible dissolution of the precipitated BaCO3. The volume of acid needed to titrate the alkali was noted. The amount of CO2 evolved from the soil during exposure to alkali was calculated using the formula: Milligrams of C or CO2 ¼ ðB  V Þ N E where B is the volume (ml) of acid needed to titrate NaOH in the jars from the control cylinders, V is the volume (ml) of acid needed to titrate the NaOH in the beakers exposed to the soil atmosphere, N is the normality of the acid, and E is the equivalent weight. To express the data in terms of carbon, E = 6; to express it as CO2, E = 22. The daily emission of carbon dioxide was expressed as mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 soil, while the cumulative carbon dioxide as mg CO2 100 g-1 soil. Agric Res (June 2013) 2(2):132–139 Analysis of Residual Carbon, Carbon Balance, and Degradation Rate Constant (k Value) At the end of 4 months, i.e., 120 days soil and residue samples were collected from the plastic pots for the analysis of residual OC. Carbon balance was calculated as given below: Carbon balance ¼ input  output where input is the inherent soil carbon ? added carbon using residues and manure, and output is the carbon emission ? residual carbon in soil. Organic carbon degradation rate constant, k was calculated using the following first-order simple kinetic model [21]. Ln ðC=C0 Þ ¼  kt where C and C0 are the final and initial carbon contents, respectively; t is the time, either day or year. Statistical Analysis SPSS version 12.0 statistical software [15] was used to analyze the data. ANOVA and univariate analysis were performed. Results and Discussion From the trend of CO2 emission, it was observed that in all types of residues and manures, emission drastically reduced after 1–3 weeks of incubation. The emission of CO2 varied among the treatments corresponding with each date of sampling. The maximum emission was recorded in the first week of incubation (Fig. 1a–c). After 3 weeks of incubation, CO2 emission came down sharply and finally approached almost zero to 5 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 soil in all types of residues and manures irrespective of water management options. The lowest amount of CO2 emission was recorded in the control pots (Fig. 1a) where only soil was used, while the highest amount found from poultry manure (Fig. 1c). At the first 4 days of incubation under continuously moist condition, carbon dioxide emission was about 4.5 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 soil in the control treatment (Fig. 1a), 26 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 when poultry manure added to soil (Fig. 1b), while it was about 34 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 soil in the sole poultry manure applied pots (Fig. 1c). Rice straw mixed with soil released 11 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 under alternate wetting and drying condition and 9 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 under continuously moist condition at the first 4 days of incubation (Fig. 1a), while these values were 6 and 9 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1, respectively when cowdung was applied (Fig. 1b). Poultry manure released high amount 135 of CO2 because it contains high amount of total nitrogen (2.09 %), and C:N ratio is low compared with other materials (Table 1), which favors rapid microbial decomposition. Manure with higher contents of nitrogen and moisture tremendously increased CO2 emission [13]. Moreover, poultry manure contains high amount of soluble or labile carbon. It was reported that if organic matter added to soil containing high amount of labile carbon potentially enhances CO2 emission and thus restricts carbon accumulation in soil [23]. The trend of CO2 emission from different organic materials where emission dropped down after 3 weeks of incubation forced us to rethink the direct use of these materials in agriculture. Anaerobic digestion and composting could be the alternative environment-friendly practice, which reduces greenhouse gases to the atmosphere and also provides biogas to replace fossil fuel and nutrient-enriched compost to be used as fertilizer. Anaerobic digestion has recently drawn attention of the scientists and policymakers to address climate change mitigation. In general, after incorporation of residues to soils, it takes time for starting microbial activities. The study was conducted in the laboratory condition; therefore, data might not correlate with the field condition because of environmental diversity and heterogeneity. Organic matter in soil is broken down through microbial degradation, root Table 2 Cumulative CO2 emission and carbon degradation rate constant under different residues and alternate wetting and drying and moist conditions Treatment factors Cumulative CO2 emission Carbon degradation rate constant, (mg CO2 100 g-1 at k (day-1) 118 days) Residues or C source Soil 158.40f 0.002090d Soil ? RS Soil ? RR 312.84d 365.80c 0.002834c 0.002393c Soil ? CD 283.10e 0.002077d Soil ? PM 576.18a 0.004185b RS 441.04b 0.005104a RR 472.23b 0.001573d CD 386.10c 0.000429e PM 580.64a 0.003160c S.E. 30.04 0.001 Alternate wetting and drying 408.76 0.003059a Continuously moist 386.00 0.002311b Water management S.E. 25.08 0.000 Residues 9 water management NS NS CD cowdung, PM poultry manure, RS rice straw, RR rice root 123 136 (a) 700 600 -1 mg CO 2 100 g Fig. 2 Cumulative carbon dioxide emission from different organic residues under alternate wetting and drying and moist condition throughout 118 days of incubation, a soil, soil plus rice straw and soil plus rice roots, b soil plus cowdung and soil plus poultry manure, c rice straw, rice roots, cowdung and poultry manure AWD alternate wetting and drying, CM continuously moist, CD cowdung, PM poultry manure, RS rice straw, RR rice root Agric Res (June 2013) 2(2):132–139 Soil-AWD Soil-RS-AWD Soil-RR-AWD 500 400 Soil-CM Soil-RS-CM Soil-RR-CM 300 200 100 0 4 12 20 28 36 44 52 60 70 82 94 106 118 Days of incubation (b) 700 Soil-CD-AWD Soil-CD-CM mg CO 2 100-1 g 600 500 Soil-PM-AWD Soil-PM-CM 400 300 200 100 8 11 6 10 94 82 70 60 52 44 36 28 20 12 4 0 Days of incubation (c) 700 RS-AWD PM-CM CD-CM mg CO2 100-1 g 600 RR-AWD RS-CM PM-AWD CD-AWD RR-CM 500 400 300 200 100 8 11 6 10 94 82 70 60 52 44 36 28 20 12 4 0 Days of incubation and faunal respiration, and released CO2, which is influenced by many factors like soil and temperature, alternate wetting and drying, and composition of organic residues. Soil microflora contributes 99 % of the CO2 arising as a result of decomposition of organic matter [16]. Composition of organic residues affects their microbial degradation. The presence of higher percentage of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin in rice straw and roots slows down its microbial decomposition and thereby limits CO2 emission [24]. The effect of carbon source on cumulative emission of CO2 at the end of 118 days of incubation was found to be significant, while the effect of water management and the 123 interaction of residues and water management were found to be insignificant (Table 2). The lowest cumulative emission of CO2 (158 mg CO2 100 g-1) was in the control treatment, i.e., where no residues were added, while the highest was recorded either from the only poultry manure (580 mg CO2 100 g-1) or poultry manure plus soil (576 mg CO2 100 g-1). The cumulative emissions from rice straw and cowdung mixed soils were 313 and 283 mg CO2 100 g-1, respectively, which were significantly lower than all other treatments except the control. The trends of cumulative emission of CO2 of the treatments corresponding with each date of sampling during the incubation periods were shown in the Fig. 2a–c. Agric Res (June 2013) 2(2):132–139 137 Table 3 Carbon balance under different residues and alternate wetting and drying and continuously moist conditions Treatment factors C input (g) C output (g) C balance (g) Soil C Residues C Total Emission C Residual C Total Soil 0.34 0 0.34 0.043e 0.26c 0.30 0.040e Soil ? RS 0.34 0.25 0.59 0.085d 0.42a 0.51 0.080a Soil ? RR 0.34 0.25 0.59 0.100c 0.43a 0.53 0.060c Soil ? CD 0.34 0.25 0.59 0.077d 0.46a 0.54 0.050d Soil ? PM 0.34 0.25 0.59 0.157a 0.36b 0.52 0.070b RS RR 0 0 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.120b 0.130b 0.14e 0.21cd 0.26 0.34 -0.010e -0.090g CD 0 0.25 0.25 0.105c 0.24c 0.35 -0.100g PM 0 0.25 0.25 0.158a 0.17de 0.33 -0.080f S.E. – – – 0.007 0.014 – 0.013 0.19 0.22 0.41 0.112a (411 mg CO2) 0.29b 0.40 0.010 Continuously moist 0.19 0.22 0.41 0.104b (381 mg CO2) 0.31a 0.41 0.000 S.E. – – – 0.003 0.007 – 0.006 NS NS Residues Water management Alternate wetting and drying Residues 9 water management NS CD cowdung, PM poultry manure, RS rice straw, RR rice root The rates of carbon degradation were significantly affected by carbon source and water management (p \ 0.05), while the interaction effect of carbon source and water management was found to be insignificant (p [ 0.05). Carbon degradation rate constants (k) in the present study varied from 0.000429 to 0.005104 day-1 (Table 2). Jorgensen [8] found a k value of 0.00001–0.0008 for mineral soil. The lowest k value was found in the cowdung-applied pots, while the highest was under the rice straw-used pots. The carbon content was high in rice straw. The emission of carbon dioxide from rice straw was low, while the k value was found to be high. This could be explained in this way that the C:N ratio of rice straw is generally high, which needs several cycles of microorganism and obviously extra time to decompose it. During breakdown process, microbes use substrate carbon as a source of energy and build up their body. The biomass of bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes are composed of 50 % carbon [2]. Therefore, large amounts of carbon will be synthesized in microbial body and therefore, less amount of carbon will be released in soil. The emission of CO2 as C and residual C in soils was significantly influenced by sources of carbon and water management options (Table 3). However, the interaction effect of carbon source and water management on carbon dioxide emission was found to be insignificant (p [ 0.05). Though the carbon contents in the rich straw and even in the roots were high, the emission of carbon dioxide, however, was higher in the poultry manure-mixed pots. During 118 days of incubation, the total amount of carbon dioxide released from only poultry manure-containing pot was 0.156 g, which was insignificantly different when poultry manure was mixed with soil. The total emission of CO2 as C over the 118 days of incubation under the control treatment, i.e., in the pot where only 100 g soil used was only 0.043 g. Alternate wetting and drying condition was found to be more efficient to release carbon dioxide from soil over moist condition. From the carbon balance study total emission of carbon dioxide as C under alternate wetting and drying condition was recorded as 0.112 g (411 mg CO2), while it was 0.104 g (381 mg CO2) in case of moist condition (Table 3), which strongly correlated with cumulative emission of CO2 as given in the Table 2. Data on residual C indicated that rice straw and cowdung were found to be more efficient to increase C contents in soils. On the other hand, continuously moist condition was observed to significantly increase C contents in soils relative to the alternate wetting and drying condition. Oxygen is only sparingly soluble in water and diffuses slowly [20]. Little amount of oxygen is present in saturated soils in the form of dissolved O2, which is quickly consumed through metabolic processes. Oxygen is used as terminal electron acceptor via respiration by roots, soil microbes, and soil organisms [18, 22], and is lost from the soil system in the form of carbon dioxide. Heterotrophic respiration may completely deplete oxygen in submerged soils, which may be observed within only a few millimeters of the soil surface [20]. Owing to the deficiency of oxygen in flooded soils, aerobic bacteria die or remain dormant, which limits microbial transformations of organic materials and thereby 123 138 reduces CO2 emission under continuously moist condition; moreover, available carbon dioxide reduced to methane [14]. This finding is also cross checked and confirmed from organic matter degradation rate constant, k (Table 2). The k value was higher under alternate wetting and drying condition than that under moist condition (Table 2). Anaerobic recycling of wastes during the long-term incubation results in a lower net residue-C mineralization in flooded systems compared with nonflooded conditions [14]. Therefore, carbon content in soil was found to be higher under continuously moist condition, and conversely CO2 emission was lower compared with alternate wetting and drying condition. Source of carbon, i.e., the residues significantly affected carbon balance, while, water management and interaction of residue and water management was found insignificant (Table 3). The negative sign of carbon balance revealed that carbon content in soil increased, where carbon output was found to be higher than carbon input. This might be interesting for discussion. Soil is a complex and heterogeneous body where carbon cycling and its transformations are regulated by different physical, chemical, and biological activities. When plant residues and manures are applied to the soil, various organic compounds undergo decomposition. Decomposition is a biological process that includes the physical breakdown and biochemical transformation of complex organic molecules of dead material into simpler organic and inorganic molecules. The addition of residues and manures to the soil surface contributes to the biological activity and the carbon cycling process in the soil. Several generations of different microbes in this process die and add carbon in soils. Carbon cycling is the continuous transformation of organic and inorganic carbon compounds by plants and micro and macroorganisms among the soil, plants and the atmosphere. In cultivated organic soils, about 450–4,500 kg of bacteria is present in per hectare-furrow slice, while fungi are present at 1,120–11,200 kg and actinomycetes are present at 450–4,500 kg [3]. Bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes contain 50 % carbon [2]. Therefore, a significant amount of carbon will be added to soils. Conclusions The peak of CO2 emission was recorded during the first week of incubation and after 3 weeks, it came down sharply and finally approached almost zero to 5 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 irrespective of organic materials and water management. At the first 4 days of incubation the emission in the control treatment was about 4.5 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 soil, while it was about 34 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 from the sole poultry manure and 26 mg CO2 day-1 kg-1 from 123 Agric Res (June 2013) 2(2):132–139 poultry manure plus soil. The carbon contents in the rich straw and roots were high; however, the emission of CO2 was higher in the poultry manure. Among the organic residues and manures, cowdung released less CO2, which was almost half of the amount released by poultry manure. Moreover, addition of cowdung increased 28 % soil carbon over poultry manure. During 118 days of incubation cumulative emission were 158, 313, 366, 283, and 576 mg CO2 100 g-1 from only soil, soil plus rice straw, soil plus rice roots, soil plus cowdung, and soil plus poultry manure, respectively. The potential of CO2 emissions of different treatments were in the order of poultry manure [ soil plus poultry manure [ rice root [ rice straw [ cowdung [ soil plus rice root [ soil plus rice straw [ soil plus cowdung [ soil. Under alternate wetting and drying condition more CO2 was released than that under continuously moist condition. Data revealed that application of cowdung in agriculture can restrict CO2 emission compared with other organic materials. From the findings, it could be apprehended that before application to soil, composting of organic materials through anaerobic digestion could be the alternative environment-friendly practice, which reduces greenhouse gases to the atmosphere and also provides biogas to replace fossil fuel and nutrient-enriched compost to be used as fertilizer. Anaerobic digestion of organic materials has recently drawn attention of the scientists and policymakers to address climate change mitigation. References 1. Agehara S, Warncke DD (2005) Soil alternate wetting and drying pure and temperature effects on nitrogen release from organic nitrogen sources. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1844–1855 2. Boyd CE (1995) Bottom soils, sediment and pond aquaculture. Chapman & Hall, New York 3. Brady NC (2001) The nature and properties of soils. PrenticeHall of India Private Ltd, New Delhi 4. Franzluebbers AJ, Doraiswamy PC (2007) Carbon sequestration, and land degradation. In: Climate and land degradation, chapter 18. Springer, Berlin, pp 343–358 5. Gnanavelrajah N, Shrestha RP, Schmidtvogt D, Samarakoon L (2008) Carbon stock assessment and Soil carbon management in agricultural land-uses in Thailand. Land Degrad Dev 19:242–256 6. IPCC (1996) Climate change 1995. Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific, technical analysis. Working group II, Cambridge University Press Cambridge 7. Jain MC, Pathak H, Bhatia A (2003) Measurement of greenhouse emission from soil and developing emission inventories. In: Pathak H, Kumer S (eds) Soil and greenhouse effect monitoring and evaluation. CBS Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi, pp 65– 78 8. Jorgensen SE (1979) Handbook of environmental data and ecological parameters. Pergamon Press, Oxford 9. Kundu S, Bhattacharyya RPV, Ghosh BN, Gupta HS (2006) Carbon sequestration and relationship between carbon addition Agric Res (June 2013) 2(2):132–139 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. and storage under rain fed soybean–wheat rotation in a sandy loam soil of the Indian Himalayas. Soil Till Res 92:87–95 Lal R (2001) Soil carbon sequestration and climate change. Senate Hearing, Science and Technical Sub-Committee, 24 May, Washington, DC Lal R (2006) Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degrad Dev 17:197–209 Lee J, Six J, King AP, van Kessel C, Rolston D (2006) Tillage and field scale controls on greenhouse gas emission. J Environ Qual 35:714–725 Ni JQ, Heber AJ, Hanni SM, Lim TT, Diehl CA (2010) Characteristics of ammonia and carbon dioxide releases from layer hen manure. Br Poult Sci 51(3):326–334 Oliver CD, Horwath WR (2000) Decomposition of rice straw and microbial carbon use efficiency under different soil temperatures and alternate wetting and drying. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1773– 1785 Pallant P (2010) SPSS survival manual: a step by step data analysis using SPSS. McGraw Hill, New York Rahman MM (2010) Carbon sequestration options in soils under different crops and their management practices. Agriculturists 8(1):90–101 139 17. Rastogi M, Singh S, Pathak H (2002) Emission of carbon dioxide from soil. Curr Sci 82:510–517 18. Reichle DE, McBrayer JF, Ausmus BS (1975) Progress in soil zoology. Academic Publishing, Czechoslovakia, pp 283–292 19. Russell AE, Larid DA, Parkin TB, Mallarino AP (2005) Impact of nitrogen fertilization and cropping system on carbon sequestration in Midwestern Mollisols. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:413–422 20. Schlesinger WH (1997) Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change, 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam 21. Stanford G, Smith SJ (1972) Nitrogen mineralization potentials of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 36:465–472 22. Sylvia DM, Fuhrmann JJ, Hartel PG, Zuberer DA (2005) Principles and applications of soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey 23. Tanvea L, Gozalez-Meler MA (2008) Decomposition kinetics of soil carbon of different age from a forest exposed to 8 years of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2670–2677 24. Walli TK, Orskov ER, Bhargava PK (1988) Rumen degradation of straw. 3. Botanical fractions of two rice straw varieties and effects of ammonia treatment. Anim Prod 46:347–352 25. WMO (2012) World Meteorological Organization. Greenhouse gas bulletin, No. 8. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/gaw/ ghg/documents/GHG_Bulletin_No.8_en.pdf 123