2018 Reviewer Thank You

2010

Journal of Holistic Nursing, 2018

Lucie Agosta Rukuye Aylaz Beverly Baliko Frankie Ballard Kristen Barbee Genevieve Bartol Marsha Bennett Gouri Shankar Bhattacharyya Kim Brannagan Sara Brown Peggy Burkhardt Sílvia Caldeira Minnie Campbell Rebecca Casarez Gayle Casterline Deborah Chapa Peggy Chinn Glenda Christiaens Kathleen Cino Tanya Cohn Barbara Cordell Eileen Deges Curl Kathleen Czekanski Mayada Daibes Lisa Davis Colleen Delaney Nicole Dempster Holly Diesel Melinda Duncan Foreman Trisha Dunning Elizabeth Edmundson Joan Engebretson Valerie Eschiti Jann Foster Nancey France Mary Friesen Noreen Frisch Barry Gallison Carol Gaskamp Beverly Greenwald Randolph Gross Robin Haddad Susan Hageness Margo Halm Toni Hebda Mary Helming Lisa Hennessy Mary Alice Hodge Linda Hollinger-Smith Patricia Hughes Louise Ivanov Ryan Jacobsen Nancy Jallo Wasantha Jayawardene Andrea Jennings Patcharee Juntaruksa Mary Kalfoss Neama Kamel Anita Kasabova Lynn Keegan Linda Keilman Heather King Bernadette Lange Carlos Laranjeira David Larkin Kat...

ETRI Journal, 2019

We would like to express our appreciation to the following reviewers for their valuable assistance and expert knowledge in 2018. With their help, we were able to maintain the high quality of papers published in ETRI Journal.

Epilepsia, 2018

Eishi Asano** Christine Baca** Albert Becker** Ettore Beghi** S andor Beniczky** Luiz Eduardo Betting** Leonardo Bonilha** Gemma Carvill** Fernando Cendes** Ana Coan** Linda de Vries** David Dunn** Rei Enatsu** Jerome Engel Jr.** Dario Englot** Barry E. Gidal** Jean Gotman** Damir Janigro** Barbara Jobst** Cecilie Johannessen Landmark** Csaba Juhasz** Andres Kanner** Jack Lin** Carla Marini** Eric Marsh** Brian Moseley** Marco Mula** Hirokazu Oguni** Sylvain Rheims** Steven Roper** Andrea Rossetti** Ren ee Shellhaas** Gagandeep Singh** Mary Lou Smith** Rainer Surges** Jose Tellez-Zenteno** Jacy Wagnon** Gaetano Zaccara**

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 2003

El-Mostapha Aboulhamid Gagan Agrawal Ahmet Akkas David Albonesi Mayez Al-Mouhamed Bharadwaj Amrutur Bj��rn Andersson Csaba Andras-Moritz Ioannis Andreadis John Andrews Fred Annexstein Amy Apon Jean Arlat Mark Arnold Remzi Arpaci-Dusseau Dimiter Avresky Hakan Aydin ... Nader Bagherzadeh Iris Bahar Xiaoliang Bai Jean-Claude Bajard Chris Barter Rajeev-Kumar Barua Sanjoy Baruah Stefano Basagni Kenneth Batcher Joanne Bechta-Dugan Wolfgang Bein Mihir Bellare Alfredo Benso Caroline Benveniste Anna Bernasc Guillem ...

The thesis of these volumes is that the study of personality traits has advanced towards “normal science” in the sense of a Kuhnian paradigm (cf. Eysenck, 1981; Kuhn, 1962). That is, most researchers in this area share a set of common core beliefs supported by empirical evidence. These include the stability of traits over time, a significant genetic and biological influence on personality, and relevance of traits to many areas of everyday life. Each one of these beliefs has been vigorously contested in the past, but the evidence in favour of each one is now overwhelming (Boyle & Saklofske, 2004; Matthews et al., 2003). At the same time, researchers do not subscribe to some crude biological determinism. The roles of gene-environment interaction in personality development and of person-situation interaction in determining behaviour are also well-established. Within the overall paradigm, trait models have also stimulated important and unresolved debates, including the optimal measurement framework for traits, the mechanisms that transmit causal effects of traits on behaviour, as well as the roles of cultural and social factors in moderating the nature of traits.

Philosophia, 2022

In Machiavelli's Prince there appears to be a link between Chap.IX on the civil principality and the hope for a unification of Italy by a new princea theme presented in the final Exhortation. In both sections, Machiavelli's unusual lack of historical illustrations suggests the hypothesis that the civil principality and the new prince play a symbolic function (not one of practical advice). The reading here proposed argues that there is an ideal relation between Machiavelli's Prince and the Discourses on Livy regarding the opportunity of a regime change from popular principality to Republic. The possibility to switch from one form of government to the other is due to Machiavelli's idealizations of the civil principality and the new prince. Accordingly, it is argued that Machiavelli's method follows a strategy of mythologizing realism. In the civil principality the tension between the new prince and his people is not resolved, nor that between the plebs and the nobles. The paper concludes that Machiavelli emphasis on 'the solitude' of the prince is what ultimately justifies a transition from the civil principality to the Republic.