Protecting the Children of Haiti
Citation
Balsari, Satchit, Jay Lemery, Timothy P. Williams, and Brett D. Nelson. 2010. “Protecting
the Children of Haiti.” New England Journal of Medicine 362 (9) (March 4): e25. doi:10.1056/
nejmp1001820.
Published Version
doi:10.1056/NEJMp1001820
Permanent link
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:30207998
Terms of Use
This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available
under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://
nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Share Your Story
The Harvard community has made this article openly available.
Please share how this access benefits you. Submit a story .
Accessibility
The
NEW ENGLA ND JOURNAL
of
MEDICINE
Perspective
Protecting the Children of Haiti
Satchit Balsari, M.D., M.P.H., Jay Lemery, M.D., Timothy P. Williams, M.S.W., M.Sc.,
and Brett D. Nelson, M.D., M.P.H., D.T.M.&H.
H
aiti has long had difficulty in protecting its
children from harm. The earthquake that struck
the country on January 12 destroyed much of the
capital, Port-au-Prince, as it killed many government
officials and United Nations (UN)
workers and left as many as
230,000 people dead and many
thousands injured. In the wake of
this sweeping disaster, the plight
of Haiti’s children has acquired
new and terrible dimensions.
On January 24, we went to
Haiti as members of a team sent
by the François-Xavier Bagnoud
Center for Health and Human
Rights at Harvard University to
conduct a multisite rapid assessment of child-protection needs in
the post-earthquake environment,
where it was already evident that
children were at grave risk of
abandonment, abuse, and trafficking. The focus was on the
current systems and practices for
identifying and caring for unaccompanied children and for trac-
ing those who had been separated from their families and
reuniting them with parents or
guardians. Longer-term interventions to promote the welfare,
rights, and safety of this population were also examined.
In 9 days, we interviewed more
than 25 stakeholders in Haiti, including government officials, local staff members, humanitarian
aid workers, and representatives
of domestic and international
nongovernmental organizations
and UN agencies. We visited field
hospitals, clinics, shelters, and orphanages, along with observing
risk-assessment practices and participating in meetings of UN
“clusters” (groups focused on individual service sectors).
Children constitute almost half
10.1056/nejmp1001820
of Haiti’s population of 9 million.
Before the earthquake, an estimated 350,000 children lived in
“orphanages,” yet only 50,000 of
them had no living parents.1
Desperately poor families have
often felt compelled to place children in residential care facilities,
only to return later and find that
they have been given away for
adoption. Throughout the world,
many families have historically
relinquished their children when
they reached a tipping point due
to unmanageable birth rates;
parental death, disability, or unemployment; physical insecurity;
displacement; or natural disasters.2 In pre-earthquake Haiti,
many families had already reached
such a crisis.
Local officials estimate that
there are about 350 registered
orphanages in the country and
about twice as many unregistered
and unregulated ones. Even most
registered institutions do not meet
international UN guidelines. A re-
nejm.org
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on January 4, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
e25(1)
P ERS P E CT IV E
A Young Boy Walks Alone on the Road after the Earthquake in Port-au-Prince.
lated long-standing threat to child
protection has been the common
practice of sending children away
as restavèks (Creole for “stay with”)
to live with others in exchange
for work. An estimated 150,000
to 500,000 restavèks work essentially as unpaid domestic laborers, with little or no access to
education or recreation and subject to physical, mental, and sexual abuse.3 The restavèk situation
and the practice of institutionalizing children reflect the extreme destitution of Haitian
families. Thus, the earthquake
occurred against a background
of economic extremity driving
family separation, aggressive trafficking networks, inadequate law
enforcement, and a growing global demand for adoptive children.
Parents died and families were
splintered as a result of the earthquake. In the rush to provide
emergency care, injured adults
and children were often scattered, taken to the nearest available health care facilities, and
sometimes transferred, without
records, to other centers. This
situation prevailed for a month,
during which time little, if any,
e25(2)
demographic or registration information was collected at sites
of care or settlement. Critical
early opportunities to record,
identify, and trace children and
families were lost. The lack of
data has impaired all aspects of
child-protection efforts.
Irregular settlement adds further risk. By January 31, there
were 1.1 million Haitians in need
of shelter in Port-au-Prince and
the surrounding communes, living in 591 documented improvised settlements — some of
which, like the Petionville Club,
hosted as many as 100,000 refugees.4 Children and young people
in these dense settlements are
easy targets for organized crime,
violence, and sexual exploitation.
This disaster has imposed a
massive socioeconomic burden on
a country that was already struggling with poor governance and
an impoverished population.
Stripped of all assets by the
earthquake, a growing number
of families are parting with their
children. Given Haiti’s unregulated borders, weak law-enforcement
practices, and insufficient numbers of international monitors,
10.1056/nejmp1001820
traffickers face few deterrents.
There is growing consternation
among child-protection workers
about the lack of financial and
human resources for protecting
Haiti’s vulnerable child population, which is estimated by some
at 1 million.5
The restavèk phenomenon and
unregulated “orphanages” pose
challenges to the placement of
unaccompanied children. Although
international standard practice
is for orphans to be promptly returned to their relatives or communities, the restavèk option and
severe poverty make communitybased solutions problematic. Many
aid workers feel compelled to
consider institutional placement
as a safer interim solution. But
safe institutions are hard to come
by. We encountered several hospitals where unaccompanied children whose treatment was complete were not being released for
lack of a safe discharge plan
(though in the first few weeks
after the earthquake, many unaccompanied children had been
discharged to the street). Representatives of orphanages visit
camps and hospitals daily, and
there is no effective mechanism
for distinguishing safe residential care facilities from fronts for
trafficking.
Adoption is sometimes seen as
a viable alternative in the face of
destitution. Experience from past
disasters and conflicts, however,
suggests that adoptions in the
immediate wake of such crises
carry a high risk of permanent
removal of children who are not
actually orphans — a practice
that inevitably inflames latent
nationalist sentiment in the affected region. The fields of child
human rights and child psychology place great emphasis on
maintaining the integrity of the
nejm.org
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on January 4, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Photo courtesy of Tim Williams.
Protecting the Children of Haiti
Photo courtesy of Brett Nelson.
PE R S PE CT IV E
family unit, where children have
the best chance of being raised in
a loving, intimate environment.
There is great need now to provide care for thousands of children, including those with medical and other postoperative needs,
and in some instances temporary protection status or adoption
across borders might be acceptable. But a much better system for
tracing children and protecting
borders must first be implemented, to reduce the risk that children will be torn from their own
families who, given the means,
would nurture and care for them.
Improved family-tracing procedures, border control, effective
scrutiny of international adoptions in line with the Hague
Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect
of Intercountry Adoption, and
more stringent oversight of orphanages are urgently needed to
forestall further abuse. We believe that all aid workers, including voluntary health care professionals, should receive training in
child-protection norms and be
sensitized to the prevalence of
child abandonment, abduction,
and trafficking. Child-protection
basics, including identification
procedures and record keeping,
reestablishment of educational
opportunities, creation of childfriendly spaces (set up specifically for children in crises to address
their physical and psychosocial
needs in a stable, trustworthy environment), and health interventions, must be ramped up rapidly.
Additional steps must be taken
to strengthen local governmental
and policing institutions charged
with child protection, specifically
the Ministry for Social Welfare
and Research and the Brigade for
the Protection of Minors.
A sustained strategy must be
Protecting the Children of Haiti
Personnel from Haiti Social Services and the United Nations Children’s Fund Visit
with Displaced Orphans in One of the Many Tent Cities in Port-au-Prince.
developed to mitigate the distress
and insecurity of affected children. The challenges of tracing
and family reunification must be
addressed through streamlined
data-acquisition systems, heightened public awareness, and community-driven monitoring initiatives. Attention to child welfare
and disability-related needs is essential, even as economic strategies are found to enable families
and communities to achieve a reasonable standard of living. A common refrain heard among aid
workers is that to ensure safe
childhoods, families must be given a fair chance to be economically viable — which requires investments in health, education,
vocational skills, sustainable livelihoods, microfinancing, and improved agricultural practices.
A senior aid worker spoke for
many seasoned responders when
he said, “We must be firmly committed to this notion of building
back Haiti better. We must not accept the restavèk phenomenon as
the inevitable. We must build a society free of restavèks. Children belong in their communities.” This
10.1056/nejmp1001820
goal will be difficult to achieve.
Yet, as the UN’s special rapporteur
recently remarked, “The human
security of every child is of utmost
importance to the sustainable development of a society based on
human rights and [is] a precondition for sustainable peace.”3
An imaginative, bold solution
is required. Recovery from an
earthquake is always complex and
slow, but Haiti’s children should
not be made to wait and suffer.
One million vulnerable children
are a very large share of Haiti’s
future and of ours.
Disclosure forms provided by the authors
are available with the full text of this article
at NEJM.org.
From the François-Xavier Bagnoud Center
for Health and Human Rights, Harvard University (S.B., J.L., T.P.W., B.D.N .) and Harvard Medical School (B.D.N.) — both in
Boston; and the Division of Emergency
Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College,
New York (S.B., J.L.).
This article (10.1056/NEJMp1001820) was
published on February 17, 2010, at NEJM.org.
1. Lederer E. UNICEF warns against Haiti
child smuggling. The Associated Press. February 9, 2010.
2. Panter-Brick C, Smith MT, eds. Abandoned
children. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
nejm.org
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on January 4, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
e25(3)
P ERS P E CT IV E
Protecting the Children of Haiti
3. Shahinian G. Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery,
including its causes and consequences —
addendum: mission to Haiti A/HRC/12/21/
Add.1. New York: United Nations, September 4, 2009. (Accessed February 16, 2010, at
e25(4)
http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/type,
MISSION,,,4ac0c6b42,0.html.)
4. International Organisation for Migration.
Improving conditions for displaced in Haiti’s
spontaneous settlements. Press briefing note,
January 25, 2010. (Accessed February 17, 2010,
10.1056/nejmp1001820
at http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/media/
press-briefing-notes/pbnAM/cache/
offonce?entryId=26872.)
5. Sequera V, Fox B. 1 million children vulnerable. The Associated Press. January 27, 2010.
Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society.
nejm.org
The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on January 4, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.