American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3: 1426–1433
Blackwell Munksgaard
C Blackwell Munksgaard 2003
Copyright
ISSN 1600-6135
doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00224.x
Anemia: A Continuing Problem Following
Kidney Transplantation
T. Christian H. Mixa , Waqar Kazmia , Samina
Khana , Robin Ruthazerb , Richard Rohrerc , Brian
J. G. Pereiraa and Annamaria T. Kausza, ∗
Divisions of a Nephrology and
b
Clinical Care Research, Department of Medicine, and
c
Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Tufts-New
England Medical Center, Boston, MA
∗Corresponding author: Annamaria T. Kausz,
[email protected]
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death
among kidney transplant recipients. Anemia, a risk factor for cardiovascular complications among patients
with chronic kidney disease, has not been well characterized in kidney transplant recipients. We performed
a retrospective cohort study of the prevalence of and
factors associated with anemia among 240 patients
who underwent kidney transplantation at our institution. The mean hematocrit (Hct) rose from 33% at
1 month after transplantation to 40% at 12 months
after transplantation. The proportion of patients with
Hct < 36% was 76% at transplantation and 21% and
36%, 1 year and 4 years after transplantation, respectively. Six months after transplantation, women had
higher likelihood (OR = 3.61) of Hct < 36%, while higher
Hct at 3 months (OR = 0.67 for 1% higher Hct) and diabetes (OR = 0.14) were associated with a lower likelihood of Hct < 36%. Similar associations were seen
12 months after transplantation. Even among patients
with Hct < 30%, only 36% had iron studies, 46% received iron supplementation and 40% received recombinant human erythropoietin. Awareness of factors
associated with a lower Hct may prompt better anemia screening and management, potentially improving cardiovascular outcomes among kidney transplant
recipients.
Key words: Anemia, chronic kidney disease, erythropoietin, glomerular filtration rate, kidney, transplant
Received 14 March 2003, revised 12 May and accepted
for publication 5 June 2003
Introduction
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among kidney transplant recipients is consistently less than normal physiologic
ranges for men and women. Yet, it was only the recent in1426
clusion of kidney transplant recipients in the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality
Initiative (K/DOQI) Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease
(CKD) (1) that brought into focus the fact that transplant recipients are also patients with CKD. Evidence is emerging
to suggest that complications of CKD are common among
these patients (2–4), and that the management of these
complications is less than optimal (5). We have recently
shown that adult patients returning to dialysis after a failed
kidney transplant have levels of hematocrit (Hct), serum
albumin and recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO)
use before initiation of dialysis (5) that are not significantly
different from those seen in the general incident end-stage
renal disease (ESRD) population (6). These indices of poor
care are manifest despite presumed regular medical care
from nephrologists and transplant physicians.
Complications of CKD adversely affect morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. Anemia has been associated
with cardiovascular complications among nontransplant
patients with CKD, including left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and LV growth (7,8). Lower Hct and hemoglobin have
been associated with higher risk of hospitalization in patients with CKD (9,10), and higher risk of mortality in patients with decreased GFRs and decreased LV function
(11). Associations between anemia, CHF, LV hypertrophy
and mortality have also been identified in kidney transplant
recipients (12,13). The importance of these findings may
be underscored by the fact that greater than 42% of kidney
transplant recipients die with a functioning graft (4), and the
majority of these deaths (42%) result from cardiovascular
disease.
Anemia is a common and early complication of CKD.
Among patients who initiated dialysis in the United States
between 1995 and 1997, 51% had a Hct less than 28%,
and 67% had a Hct less than 30% (6). A study of patients
with CKD seen in nephrology clinics demonstrated that
45% of the patients with serum creatinine levels less than
2 mg/dL had a Hct less than 36% (14). There are, however,
limited data regarding the prevalence of anemia among kidney transplant recipients (15,16).
We undertook this retrospective longitudinal cohort
study to characterize changes in Hct following kidney
transplantation and to identify factors associated with
those changes. Improved understanding of the natural history of anemia among kidney transplant recipients and risk
factors associated with anemia may enable better timing
Anemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients
and targeting of anemia-directed therapies, with the goal
of ameliorating cardiovascular disease in this high-risk
population.
Methods
coexisting disease, to 3 = uncontrolled condition that causes moderate-tosevere disease manifestations during medical care. Each patient was also
assigned a global IDS score, which represents the maximum score assigned
among the 20 domains. Ischemic heart disease, nonischemic heart disease
and HTN were recorded separately as present if the respective IDS scores
were >0.
Patient population
Analytical methods
Subjects for this retrospective longitudinal cohort study included all patients
aged 18 years or older who underwent kidney transplantation at Tufts-New
England Medical Center between October 1, 1990 and September 30, 1999.
Post-transplant data collection was extended through September 30, 2000,
to allow a minimum 1-year follow-up period for all patients. Data were obtained from the time of transplantation until the end of the study period, the
occurrence of graft failure, transfer of care to a different institution, death
or loss to follow up.
Descriptive analyses: Patient demographic, clinical and laboratory variables were reported as mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous
variables and proportions for categorical variables. Demographic variables
among patients who were lost to follow up or transferred their care were
compared with those of the remaining cohort to investigate whether bias
was introduced as a result of their loss from the cohort.
Data
Data were abstracted by physician investigators from hospital charts,
nephrology and transplant surgery out-patient clinic charts and Clinical Information Systems (CIS), a computerized patient database that contains laboratory results, hospitalization and out-patient clinic data, and other hospitalbased care data. Data were directly entered into an electronic database
designed for this study.
Baseline data at the time of kidney transplantation included (1): patient demographic information such as age at transplantation, gender and race (2),
clinical information such as primary cause and duration of end-stage renal
disease (ESRD), comorbid conditions/index of disease severity (IDS) score,
modality of renal replacement therapy before transplantation, history of prior
kidney transplant, and (3) transplant-related information such as type of kidney donor, histocompatability and cross match data, viral serology, use of induction immunosuppression with muromonab-CD3 (OKT3), antithymocyte
globulin (ATG) or an IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA), requirement for perioperative blood transfusion and occurrence of delayed graft function. Medication use and laboratory data were recorded when available from patient
charts. Longitudinal data were collected monthly for the first 6 months after
transplantation and then every 3 months for up to 60 months after transplantation. Data collection at each point included outpatient blood pressure,
weight and laboratory data, medication use, and hospitalization data, including occurrence and treatment of acute rejection. The reason for the last
follow up was recorded. If a laboratory value was not available coincident
with the visit, the value closest to the visit within ±15 days was used during the first 6 months of follow up, and the value closest to the visit within
±45 days was used beyond 6 months after transplantation. Data collection
terminated when a study end-point was reached.
Data categorization and definitions
Kidney function was expressed as GFR, estimated with an equation derived from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study, which
includes age, gender, race and serum creatinine (17,18), and has been validated for use in the kidney transplant population (19,20). Serum creatinine
levels at T-NEMC were calibrated to Cleveland Clinic levels (where serum
creatinine used in the development of the MDRD equation was measured)
by subtracting 0.2 mg/dL, the mean difference between the values obtained at T-NEMC and the Cleveland Clinic labs. Episodes of acute rejection
were identified from hospitalization records. Confirmation of the diagnosis
of acute rejection by kidney transplant biopsy was documented if a biopsy
was performed.
Co-morbidity was assessed using the Index of Disease Severity (IDS), as
described by Greenfield and colleagues (21), and later modified by Athienites and colleagues (22) for use in ESRD patients. The modified IDS assigns
one of four severity levels to 20 disease domains; from 0 = absence of
American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3: 1426–1433
Hematocrit values were determined at the following specified time intervals after transplantation: 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. Given the
variability in Hct values, the representative Hct for a given time interval was
taken as the mean of visit-related Hct values around each time interval as
follows: Hct at 1 month after transplantation was taken as the mean of visitrelated Hct values recorded for the first 1.5 months after transplantation,
Hct at 3 months after transplantation was taken as the mean of visit-related
Hct values recorded for months 1.5 through 4.5 after transplantation, Hct
at 6 months after transplantation was taken as the mean of visit-related Hct
values recorded for months 4.5 to 9 after transplantation, Hct at 12 months
and each subsequent year after transplantation was taken as the mean of
visit-related Hct values recorded within the 3-month intervals immediately
before and after each year of transplantation. The representative estimated
GFR at 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation was similarly taken as
the mean of estimated GFR values determined during the time intervals
described earlier.
Patients were then assigned to a Hct category (<30%, 30 to <33%,
33 to <36% and ≥36%) within each time interval, reflecting varying degrees of severity of anemia. The categories were based partly on the
Medicare-determined threshold of Hct (<30%) for initiation of rHuEPO in
the Medicare-eligible population, and on the K/DOQI target Hct range of
33–36% for patients with CKD (23). The proportion of patients within each
Hct category was determined for each time interval after transplant. The
95% confidence interval (CI) for each proportion was determined using the
normal approximation to the binomial, bounded at 0% and 100%.
Changes in the distribution of Hct across different levels of kidney function
were illustrated by first categorizing patients by stage of CKD according to
the K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease (1), using
the mean GFR at 6 and 12 months after transplantation. The proportion and
95% confidence interval (CI) of patients with Hct < 30%, 30 to <33%, 33 to
<36% and ≥36% was then determined within each CDK stage. Glomerular
filtration rate and Hct data from clinic visits that coincided with rHuEPO use
were excluded from these analyses.
The proportion of all patients in the cohort who underwent testing for iron
deficiency, and the proportion of all patients who received iron supplementation and/or rHuEPO, was determined. These proportions were also determined among the subsets of patients with a lowest recorded Hct < 33%
and <30%, selected as two thresholds likely to prompt investigation of and
treatment for anemia.
Factors associated with anemia at 6 and 12 months
after transplantation
We explored three different thresholds for anemia: Hct < 36% (mild anemia), Hct < 33% (moderate anemia) and Hct < 30% (severe anemia) at 6
and 12 months after kidney transplantation. We chose to investigate factors
associated with anemia at 6 and 12 months after transplantation because
1427
Mix et al.
this appears to be the time of fullest possible recovery of erythropoiesis (24).
It was also presumed that the post-transplant course would have stabilized
after 6 to 12 months.
Univariate associations (p < 0.05) between anemia and clinical factors likely
to be associated with anemia were identified with Chi-square testing for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Odds ratios for these
univariate associations were determined with logistic regression. Variables
with significant univariate associations with anemia were then incorporated
into multivariate logistic regression models utilizing a stepwise selection
process. We decided a priori to adjust the model for age, gender and race,
regardless of the significance of the univariate association. Race was described as a three-level categorical variable with Caucasian being the referent group. We strived for a target ratio of 10 outcomes per variable in the
model. No attempt was made to impute missing data. Given the anticipated
strength of the association between Hct in the preceding time interval and
anemia, regression models were created that excluded Hct in the preceding
time interval to facilitate the identification of other clinical factors associated
with anemia.
Steps were taken to ensure that values for explanatory variables used in regression models predated Hct values that were used to identify a patient as
anemic. As such, models of anemia at 6 months after transplantation used
values for explanatory variables recorded before 4.5 months after transplantation. Similarly, models of anemia at 12 months after transplantation used
values for explanatory variables recorded before 9 months after transplantation. Odds ratios were reported with 95% CI.
All statistical analyses were performed using SAS System for Windows,
version 8.02 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of kidney transplant recipients
at Tufts-New England Medical Center between 1990 and 1999
compared with the national population
Patient
characteristic
Age at transplantation (years)
18 to <45
45 to <65
≥65
Female
Race
Caucasian
Black
Asian
Other
Cause of ESRD
Glomerulonephritis
Diabetes
Hypertension
Polycystic kidney disease
Other
Type of kidney donor
Cadaveric
Living
Previous kidney transplant
T-NEMC
(n = 240)
USRDSa
(n = 109,127)
45%
48%
7%
38%
52%b
43%
5%
40%
81%
8%
4%
7%
71%
23%
4%
2%
42%
17%
13%
10%
18%
23%
22%
15%
7%
33%
51%
49%
5%
74%
26%
11%
T-NEMC = Tufts-New England Medical Center; USRDS = United
States Renal Data System; ESRD = end stage renal disease.
a Averages of kidney transplant recipients spanning 1988–1998
per USRDS Annual Data Report; recipients age ≥20 years.
b Represents the USRDS patient age range of 20 to <45 years.
Results
Patient population
Two hundred and forty patients underwent kidney transplantation between October 1, 1990 and September 30,
1999. Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort and compares it with national averages. The mean age of the recipients at transplantation
was 45 years, 38% were females and 81% were Caucasians. The most common cause of kidney failure was
glomerulonephritis (42%) followed by diabetes mellitus
(17%). Hemodialysis was the most common mode of renal replacement therapy among patients on dialysis at the
time of transplant. Twenty-three patients (10%) received a
preemptive kidney transplant.
Almost half of the kidney transplants came from living
donors. Twelve (5%) patients had undergone a prior kidney transplant. Human leukocyte antigen data were available for 228 patients in the cohort. Of these, 124 (54%) had
0–3 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches with their
donor and 104 (46%) had 4–6 HLA mismatches. Subjects
were evenly distributed across the four possible donor–
recipient combinations of CMV serologic status, with 26%,
25%, 25% and 23% in donor (D)+/recipient (R)–, D+/R +,
D–/R– and D–/R+ categories, respectively. Induction therapy was administered to 38 (16%) patients. Ninety-one percent of the subjects were taking cyclosporine at 1 month
1428
after transplantation and 9% were taking tacrolimus. Seventy percent of the subjects were taking azathioprine at 1
month after transplantation, 25% were taking mycophenolate mofetil and 5% had no record of receiving an
antimetabolite.
Follow up
The mean ± SD and median (range) duration of followup of patients in the study was 41 ± 30 months and 35
(1–118 months) months, respectively. Seventeen patients
received kidney transplants but no kidney transplant follow up: 13 patients had either primary nonfunction or an
immediate postoperative complication (e.g. vascular rejection) that resulted in transplant nephrectomy within the first
month, three patients died during the immediate postoperative period and one died shortly after discharge with graft
function. One hundred and forty-six (64%) patients were
followed through the end of the study period with graft
function. Of the remaining patients in the cohort, 24 (11%)
returned to dialysis, 13 (6%) died, 20 (9%) transferred care
out of our institution and 20 (9%) were lost to follow up.
Acute rejection occurred in 77 patients (32% of the cohort). The baseline demographic characteristics of the 40
patients who either transferred care out of our institution or
were lost to follow up were not significantly different from
those of the remainder of the cohort (data not shown).
American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3: 1426–1433
Anemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients
100%
Proportion of patients
90%
80%
Hematocrit
70%
≥ 36%
33% − < 36%
30% − < 33%
< 30%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
(Mean Hct)
Figure 1: Changes in hematocrit levels after kidney
transplantation.
[n]
0
1
3
6
12
24
36
48
60
(33%) (33%) (37%) (39%) (40%) (39%) (38%) (38%) (38%)
[240] [223] [221] [211] [196] [150] [106] [78] [54]
Months after transplantation
Prevalence of anemia
Hematocrit levels were available for 94% of patients at
1-month follow-up and for 95–100% of patients at subsequent follow-up intervals. The mean Hct and the distribution of Hct levels at each time point during follow up are
shown in Figure 1. At the time of transplant surgery, 22%
(95% CI 16%, 28%) of the cohort had Hct < 30%. The
mean Hct rose from its nadir of 33% (95% CI 27%, 39%),
both at the time of transplantation and at 1 month after
transplantation, to a peak of 40% (95% CI 34%, 46%) 12
months after transplantation, and declined thereafter. During the first year after transplantation, the proportion of patients with Hct < 36% steadily decreased from 76% (95%
CI 70%, 82%) at transplantation to 21% (95% CI 15%,
27%) at 12 months after transplantation. The proportion of
patients with Hct < 33% declined over a shorter time interval, from 48% (95% CI 42%, 54%) at transplantation to
7% (95% CI 3%, 11%) at 6 months after transplantation.
Factors associated with anemia at 6 months
after transplantation
Female gender was independently associated with a
higher likelihood of Hct < 36% at 6 months after transplantation, as shown in Table 2. Factors independently associated with lower likelihood of Hct < 36% included diabetes as the cause of native kidney failure and higher Hct
at 3 months after transplantation. When Hct at 3 months
after transplantation was omitted from the model, CMV
D+/R– disease and female gender remained as factors independently associated with greater likelihood of anemia.
Beyond 1 year after transplantation, the proportion of patients with Hct < 36% increased from 21% (95% CI 15%,
27%) at 12 months to 36% (95% CI 26%, 46%) at 4 years
after transplantation. Likewise, the proportion with Hct <
33% increased from 7% (95% CI 3%, 11%) at 6 months
after transplantation to 20% (95% CI 10%, 30%) at 4 years
after transplantation.
Factors associated with anemia at 12 months
after transplantation
Higher Hct and GFR at 6 months after kidney transplantation were independently associated with lower likelihood
of Hct < 36% at 12 months after transplantation, as shown
in Table 2. The omission of Hct at 6 months after transplantation from the model allowed female gender to emerge
as independently associated with higher likelihood of Hct
< 36%.
Six and 12 months after kidney transplantation, the proportion of patients with some degree of anemia progressively increased with increasing stages of CKD, as shown
in Figure 2. Among patients with GFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73
m2 , 11% (95% CI 0%, 25%) and 7% (95% CI 0%,
16%) had some degree of anemia at 6 and 12 months
after transplantation, respectively, whereas among patients with GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 , 60% (95% CI
35%, 95%) and 76% (95% CI 53%, 99%) had some degree of anemia at 6 and 12 months after transplantation,
respectively.
American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3: 1426–1433
Several factors were associated with higher likelihood of
Hct < 33% at 6 months after transplantation in the univariate analysis. The limited number of outcomes (15 patients with Hct < 33%), however, precluded a multivariate
analysis. Five patients had Hct < 30% at 6 months after
transplantation.
Several factors were associated with higher likelihood
of Hct < 33% at 6 months after transplantation in the
univariate analysis. The limited number of outcomes (18 patients with Hct < 33%) again precluded a multivariate analysis. Three patients had Hct < 30% at 12 months after
transplantation.
Other factors that were tested, but showed no significant
association with anemia at either 6 or 12 months after
1429
Mix et al.
6 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
100%
90%
80%
70%
Hematocrit
60%
≥ 36%
33% − < 36%
50%
30% − < 33%
40%
< 30%
30%
20%
10%
0%
(Mean Hct)
[n]
<30
30-<60
60-<90
(34%)
[15]
(39%)
[85]
(40%)
[88]
>/=90
(41%)
[18]
<30
30-<60
(35%)
[13]
60-<90
(40%)
[82]
(42%)
[76]
>/=90
(41%)
[28]
GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Figure 2: Hematocrit
levels at different stages of
chronic kidney disease.
Analysis includes 206 patients at the 6-month interval
after kidney transplantation
and 199 patients at the
12-month interval after kidney
transplantation.
Table 2: Factors associated with anemia after kidney transplantation
Hct < 33% (n = 15/209)
Hct < 36% (n = 52/209)
6 months after transplantation
Univariate OR
(95% CI)
Univariate OR
(95% CI)
Multivariate w/Hcta
OR (95% CI)
Multivariate w/o
Hctb OR (95% CI)
Female
CMV D+/R– vs. other
DM vs. no DM
HLA mismatche
Induction therapy ATG vs. none
Hct at 3 monthsf
GFR at 3 monthsg
ACEI in previous 4.5 months
7.09 (1.93, 25.96)
2.35 (1.19, 4.63)
0.27 (0.08, 0.93)
0.74 (0.56, 0.99)
7.18 (1.61, 31.97)
0.73 (0.62, 0.86)
0.62 (0.44, 0.86)
4.48 (1.53, 13.12)
3.07 (1.61, 5.86)
2.96 (1.39, 6.29)
0.14 (0.03, 0.62)
3.61 (1.60, 8.15)
4.03 (2.00, 8.09)
0.72 (0.65, 0.81)
0.83 (0.72,.97)
0.67 (0.59, 0.77)
Not applicable
Hct < 33% (n = 18/200)
Hct < 36% (n = 43/200)
12 months after transplantation
Univariate OR
(95% CI)
Univariate OR
(95% CI)
Multivariate w/Hctc
OR (95% CI)
Multivariate w/o
Hctd OR (95% CI)
Age at transplanth
Female
Hct at 6 monthsf
GFR at 6 monthsg
ACEI in pprevious 9 months
0.62 (0.42, 0.91)
2.63 (1.32, 5.23)
0.63 (0.51, 0.76)
0.52 (0.37, 0.73)
3.00 (1.12, 8.02)
3.89 (1.78, 8.50)
0.64 (0.55, 0.74)
0.70 (0.58, 0.84)
2.19 (1.07, 4.49)
0.65 (0.55, 0.77)
0.77 (0.62, 0.97)
Not applicable
0.66 (0.54, 0.80)
Hct = hematocrit; CMV D+/R– = cytomegalovirus donor positive/recipient negative versus other serologic combinations; DM =
diabetes]mellitus; HLA = human leukocyte antigen; ATG = antithymocyte globulin; ACEI = angiotensin II converting enzyme inhibitor.
a Models adjusted for age, gender, race, and include a variable for Hct at 3 months.
b Models adjusted for age, gender, race, and exclude a variable for Hct at 3 months.
c Models adjusted for age, gender, race, and include a variable for Hct at 6 months.
d Models adjusted for age, gender, race, and exclude a variable for Hct at 6 months.
e Odds per one additional antigen mismatch.
f Odds per 1% point higher Hct.
g Odds per 10 mL/min/1.73m2 higher GFR.
h Odds per 10 years older at transplantation.
1430
American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3: 1426–1433
Anemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients
transplantation, included type of kidney donor (living vs. cadaveric), induction therapy, baseline immunosuppression,
delay of graft function, acute rejection, type of treatment
for acute rejection, use of rHuEPO, ACEI and/or ARB drugs,
receipt of blood transfusion, smoking history, and burden
of comorbid disease.
over the next 5 months. While the prevalence of anemia
appeared to be lowered by 6 and 12 months after transplant, 25% and 21% of patients remained anemic at these
times, respectively. These results are consistent with what
is known about the resumption of erythropoiesis in kidney
transplant patients (24,27).
Diagnosis and management of anemia
Twelve percent of the cohort had evaluation for iron deficiency at any time during follow up, 18% received iron supplementation and 10% received rHuEPO. Among patients
with the lowest Hct < 33%, 26% had iron studies, 36%
received iron supplementation and 25% received rHuEPO.
Among patients with the lowest Hct < 30%, 36% had iron
studies, 46% received iron supplementation and 40% received rHuEPO.
We identified several factors associated with anemia at
6 and 12 months after kidney transplantation. Women
had 3–4-fold higher likelihood than men of Hct < 36%
at 6 and 12 months after transplantation. One explanation may be the return of menses in age-appropriate females after successful transplantation, which may in turn
potentiate anemia through iron deficiency. Studies of reproductive function following kidney transplantation have
demonstrated that menstruation generally resumes in ageappropriate females within the first 6 months after transplantation (28,29), and may be seen as early as 6 weeks
after transplantation (30). Furthermore, iron deficiency has
been reported to be common in both male and female kidney transplant recipients. In a prospective cohort of kidney transplant recipients, 50% were found to have evidence of iron deficiency 2 weeks after transplantation
(31), and patients who did not receive iron supplementation remained iron deficient and anemic at 6 months after
transplantation. A recent cross-sectional analysis of 432
kidney transplant recipients demonstrated that iron deficiency was present in 20% (15). Alternatively, greater odds
of Hct < 36% observed in women in our cohort may simply reflect physiologic differences in Hct for women and
men (32).
Discussion
The findings of this study demonstrate that anemia was
common following kidney transplantation. At least 70%
of kidney transplant recipients had some degree of anemia in the first 6 months after transplantation, and up
to one-third were anemic between 1 and 5 years after
transplantation. There were transplant- and nontransplantrelated factors associated with anemia at 6 and 12 months
after transplantation. The investigation and treatment of
anemia were infrequent. The current study provides further insight into the problem of anemia in kidney transplant
recipients and highlights the need for greater efforts to investigate and treat anemia in this population of patients
with CKD.
The importance of anemia among patients with CKD has
been well documented. Higher hematocrit and hemoglobin
levels are associated with decreased risk of hospitalization
among patients with earlier stages of CKD (9,10). Anemia
is also a risk factor for death in individuals with decreased
kidney function and concomitant decreased left ventricular
function (11). Associations between anemia and abnormal
LV morphology among patients with chronic kidney disease are well established (7,8). Furthermore, treatment of
anemia with rHuEPO has been associated with regression
of LV hypertrophy in patients with CKD (25,26). Studies of
the relationship between anemia and cardiovascular disease in the transplant population have demonstrated associations between anemia and LV hypertrophy (13) and
anemia and the development of CHF (12). The high prevalence of cardiovascular mortality among kidney transplant
recipients with graft function, reported to account for 36%
of all deaths with graft function (4), heightens the concern
that anemia may have significant adverse consequences
for this group of patients.
We found the prevalence of anemia was largely unchanged
at 1 month after transplantation, as compared with the
peri-transplant period. Erythropoiesis gradually recovered
American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3: 1426–1433
Cytomegalovirus D+/R– serology was associated with
an almost threefold higher likelihood of mild anemia
(Hct < 36%) at 6 months after transplantation, in a model
that excluded Hct at 3 months after transplantation. Cytomegalovirus D+/R– serology could be a surrogate marker
for CMV infection, as this is the serologic group at highest risk. Both CMV infection and prophylaxis against CMV
infection have established bone marrow suppressive effects (33,34). We also noted 86% lower odds of Hct <
36% at 6 months after transplantation among patients with
diabetes in the model that included Hct at 3 months after transplantation. A potential explanation would be more
frequent exposure to physicians as a consequence of the
need for diabetes care, in addition to kidney transplant care,
as well as more rigorous evaluation and management of
anemia given the higher risk of cardiovascular disease in
this population.
Lower Hct at 3 and 6 months after transplantation was consistently associated with higher likelihood of anemia at 6
and 12 months after transplantation, respectively, indicating that patients who are anemic at 3 and 6 months after
transplantation are likely to remain anemic, at least over
the next 3 to 6 months. This may suggest an opportunity
to improve the approach to anemia management in these
patients.
1431
Mix et al.
Higher GFR at 3 and 6 months after transplantation was
consistently associated with lower likelihood of anemia at 6
and 12 months after transplantation, respectively. This confirmed our expectation that better kidney function in kidney
transplant recipients would be associated with more effective erythropoiesis. In addition, the prevalence of anemia at
6 and 12 months after transplantation appeared to increase
among patients with a more advanced stage of CKD. These
findings are corroborated by a recent analysis of data from
the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES) (35), which demonstrated a higher prevalence
of anemia among individuals with lower estimated GFRs.
In the NHANES cohort, the mean Hct at each level of CKD
was similar to what we observed in this kidney transplant
cohort, suggesting a similarity in the relationship between
the GFR and Hct among patients with CKD after kidney
transplant and patients with nontransplant-related CKD.
It is known that patients with failed kidney transplants return to dialysis with levels of Hct and rHuEPO use that are
not significantly different from the general incident ESRD
population, in spite of presumed regular medical care (5). It
would be reasonable to expect that management of complications of CKD, during the time leading up to kidney
transplantation, would be optimized to limit peri-transplant
morbidity. Anemia in our cohort, however, was surprisingly
common at the time of transplantation: nearly one-quarter
of recipients had Hct < 30% and nearly half had Hct < 33%.
It is conceivable that better attention to management of
anemia before kidney transplantation could minimize not
only the risk of adverse cardiovascular events but also the
use of perioperative blood transfusions.
Anemia management after transplantation also appeared
to merit improvement. Anemia-targeted diagnostic and
therapeutic interventions were used infrequently. Few patients in our cohort had iron studies, or received iron supplementation or rHuEPO, although the proportions of patients
undergoing investigation and treatment of anemia did increase among patients with the lowest Hct levels. Earlier
studies raising concerns that rHuEPO use may hasten the
decline of the GFR may have limited its use, although these
concerns have since been dispelled (36–38). Lastly, the era
of our investigation precedes recent heightened attention
to treating the complications of chronic kidney disease,
resulting from the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) (1).
This study has limitations inherent in retrospective data.
The small sample size of this study limits its ability to detect
associations between anemia and various clinical factors.
Larger studies are therefore needed to confirm risk factors
for anemia identified by this study, and to provide further
insight into other risk factors for anemia. Differences in patient demographics with respect to national data may limit
the ability to generalize our results. While our cohort had
a similar proportion of female recipients to national kidney
transplant statistics, there was a higher proportion of Cau1432
casian and fewer Black recipients (39). A higher proportion
of living donors and fewer patients with prior transplants in
our cohort than in the national statistics may have resulted
in better graft outcomes and thus a lower prevalence of
anemia than that observed in the national transplant population. In addition, the cohort was comprised of patients
receiving care at a single university hospital, and the approach to transplant care is not uniform across transplant
centers. Finally, the number of patients in the study is relatively small, limiting its power. Despite these potential concerns, the analysis provides insight into trends in anemia
after kidney transplantation, factors associated with anemia, the relationship between Hct and the GFR and details
regarding the diagnosis and management of anemia.
In conclusion, anemia was common after kidney transplantation and persisted in a substantial proportion of kidney transplant recipients. Female gender, lower GFR and
lower Hct appear to be important predictors of anemia at 6
and 12 months after transplantation. The investigation and
treatment of anemia was suboptimal during the timeframe
of the study. This highlights a lack of attentiveness to risk
factors that have potential for causing increased morbidity.
Increased awareness, timely diagnosis and treatment of
anemia after kidney transplantation could be an important
strategy to improve cardiovascular outcomes in this highrisk population. Further studies are required to assess the
impact of treatment on cardiovascular outcomes among
kidney transplant recipients.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the contributions of Debbie Chabot, RN, and Drs Richard
Freeman, Michael Angelis and Jeffrey Cooper of the Division of Transplantation, who provided us with access to the transplant surgery clinic records
of patients in the study. We also acknowledge the nephrology research assistants Gowri Raman and Aarti Kalra, who assisted in data abstraction and
database entry.
This project was supported in part by Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA,
and grants from the National Institutes of Health (1F32DK59704-01 [Dr
Mix], F32DK59704-01 [Dr Kazmi], and 1K08DK02745 [Dr Kausz]). Dr. Pereira
serves on Amgen’s Aranesp (Medical Advisory Board).
References
1. K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease.
Evaluation, Classification and Stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;
39: S1–S266.
2. Kasiske BL, Guijarro C, Massy ZA, Wiederkehr MR, Ma JZ. Cardiovascular disease after renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol
1996; 7: 158–165.
3. Guijarro C, Massy ZA, Wiederkehr MR, Ma JZ, Kasiske BL. Serum
albumin and mortality after renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis
1996; 27: 117–123.
4. Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Wolfe RA, Leichtman AB, Agodoa LY, Port
FK. Long-term survival in renal transplant recipients with graft
function. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 307–313.
American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3: 1426–1433
Anemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients
5. Gill JS, Abichandani R, Khan S, Kausz AT, Pereira BJ. Opportunities to improve the care of patients with kidney transplant failure.
Kidney Int 2002; 61: 2193–2200.
6. Obrador GT, Ruthazer R, Arora P, Kausz AT, Pereira BJG. Prevalence of and factors associated with sub-optimal care prior to
initiation of dialysis in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;
10: 1793–1800.
7. Levin A, Singer J, Thompson CR, Ross H, Lewis M. Prevalent left
ventricular hypertrophy in the predialysis population: Identifying
opportunities for intervention. Am J Kidney Dis 1996; 27: 347–
354.
8. Levin A, Thompson CR, Ethier J et al. Left ventricular mass index
increase in early renal disease: impact of decline in hemoglobin.
Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 34: 125–134.
9. Khan S, Kazmi W, Abichandani R, Tighiouart H, Pereira B, Kausz
A. Health care utilization among patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 229–236.
10. Holland DC, Lam M. Predictors of hospitalization and death
among pre-dialysis patients: a retrospective cohort study. Nephrol
Dial Transplant 2000; 15 (5): 650–658.
11. Al-Ahmad A, Rand W, Manjunath G, Konstam M, Salem D, Levey
AS. Reduced kidney function and anemia as risk factors for mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiology 2001; 38: 955–962.
12. Rigatto C, Parfrey P, Foley R, Negrijn C, Tribula C, Jeffery J. Congestive heart failure in renal transplant recipients: risk factors,
outcomes, and relationship with ischemic heart disease. J Am
Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1084–1090.
13. Rigatto C, Foley R, Jeffery J, Negrijn C, Tribula C, Parfrey P. Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in renal transplant
recipients: prognostic value and impact of blood pressure and
anemia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 462–468.
14. Kazmi WH, Kausz AT, Khan S et al. Anemia – An early complication
of chronic renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: 803–812.
15. Lorenz M, Kletzmayr J, Perschl A, Furrer A, Horl WH, SunderPlassmann G. Anemia and iron deficiencies among long-term renal transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 794–797.
16. Yorgin PD, Scandling JD, Belson A, Sanchez J, Alexander SR,
Andreoni K. Late post-transplant anemia in adult renal transplant
recipients. An under-recognized problem? Am J Transplant 2002;
2: 429–435.
17. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D.
A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate
from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med
1999; 130: 461–470.
18. Manjunath G, Sarnak MJ, Levey AS. Prediction equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate: An update. Curr Opin Nephrol
Hypertens 2001; 10: 785–792.
19. Stoves J, Lindley EJ, Barnfield MC, Burniston MT, Newstead CG.
MDRD equation estimates of glomerular filtration rate in potential
living kidney donors and renal transplant recipients with impaired
graft function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 2036–2037.
20. Manotham K, Booranalertpaisarn V, Eiam-Ong S, Chusil S, Praditpornsilpa K, Tungsanga K. Accurately simple estimation of
glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplant patients. Transplant
Proc 2002; 34: 1148–1151.
21. Greenfield S, Nelson E. Recent developments and future issues in
the use of health status assessment measures in clinical setting.
Med Care 1992; 30: 23–41.
American Journal of Transplantation 2003; 3: 1426–1433
22. Athienites N, Miskulin D, Fernandez G et al. Comorbidity assessment in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis using the Index of
Coexisitent Disease. Sem Dialysis 2000; 13: 320–326.
23. NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Anemia of Chronic
Kidney Disease: Update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37 (Suppl.
1): S182–S236.
24. Brown J, Lappin T, Elder G, Taylor T, Bridges J, McGeown M. The
initiation of erythropoiesis following renal transplantation. Nephrol
Dial Transplant 1989; 4: 1076–1079.
25. Hayashi T, Suzuki A, Shoji T et al. Cardiovascular effect of normalizing the hematocrit level during erythropoietin therapy in predialysis patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35:
250–256.
26. Portoles J, Torralbo A, Martin P, Rodrigo J, Herrero J, Barrientos
A. Cardiovascular effects of recombinant human erythropoietin in
predialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 29: 541–548.
27. Sun CH, Ward HJ, Paul WL, Koyle MA, Yanagawa N, Lee DB.
Serum erythropoietin levels after renal transplantation. N Engl J
Med 1989; 321: 151–157.
28. Merkatz IR, Schwartz GH, David DS, Stenzel KH, Riggio RR,
Whitsell JC. Resumption of female reproductive function following renal transplantation. JAMA 1971; 216: 1749–1754.
29. Kim JH, Chun CJ, Kang CM, Kwak JY. Kidney transplantation and
menstrual changes. Transplant Proc 1998; 30: 3057–3059.
30. Abramovici H, Brandes JM, Better OS, Peretz A, Paldi E. Menstrual cycle and reproductive potential after kidney transplantation. Report of 2 patients. Obstet Gynecol 1971; 37: 121–125.
31. Moore LW, Smith SO, Winsett RP, Acchiardo SR, Gaber AO. Factors affecting erythropoietin production and correction of anemia
in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 1994; 8: 358–364.
32. Pan WH, Habicht JP. The non-iron-deficiency-related difference
in hemoglobin concentration distribution between blacks and
whites and between men and women. Am J Epidemiol 1991;
134: 1410–1416.
33. Buhles WC Jr, Mastre BJ, Tinker AJ, Strand V, Koretz SH. Ganciclovir treatment of life- or sight-threatening cytomegalovirus infection: Experience in 314 immunocompromised patients. Rev
Infect Dis 1988; 10 (Suppl. 3): S495–S506.
34. Farrugia E, Schwab TR. Management and prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation. Mayo Clin
Proc 1992; 67: 879–890.
35. Astor BC, Muntner P, Levin A, Eustace JA, Coresh J. Association
of kidney function with anemia: The Third National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–94). Arch Intern Med 2002;
162: 1401–1408.
36. Lim VS, DeGowin RL, Zavala D et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin treatment in predialysis patients: a double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 108–114.
37. The US Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Predialysis Group.
Double-blind, placebo controlled study of the therapeutic use of
recombinant human erythropoietin for anemia associated with
chronic renal failure in predialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1991;
18: 50–59.
38. Roth D, Smith R, Schulman G et al. Effects of recombinant human
erythropoietin on renal function in chronic renal failure predialysis
patients. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24: 777–784.
39. USRDS. US Renal Data System. 2001 Annual Data Report.
Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health, National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, 2001.
1433