ENTRY INTO LABOUR: T H E E X P E R I E N C E O F
YOUNG ADULTS IN BRAZIL
C A N D I D O A. G O M E S
Abstract -- This study focuses on the experience of young adults employed in the
tertiary sector in Brasflia. The results show that young people are prepared for
work by on-the-job training and nonformal education; schooling is mainly an
indicator of trainability. Entry into the labour force reinforces social differences in
family background and schooling. The results tend to support the moderate
version of classical theory with regard to the nature of school/work relationships.
In the context of the conflict paradigm, the data run contrary to both reproductionism and the radical critique of this view. From the comparative standpoint
youth is an underprivileged group in the labour market, regardless of sex, socioeconomic status and country of residence. Despite these variations, societies are
stratified by age groups.
Zusammenfassung -- Diese Studie konzentriert sich auf die Erfahrungen junger,
im Dienstleistungsbereich besch~iftigter Erwachsener in Brasilia. Die Ergebnisse
zeigen, dab junge Leute durch praktische Ausbildung im Betrieb und nichtformelle Erziehung auf ihre Arbeit vorbereitet werden; der Schulunterricht gibt
haupts~ichlich Hinweise auf die Lernf'~ihigkeit. Der Eintritt in die Arbeitswelt
verst~irkt die im famili~iren Bereich und hinsichtlich der Schulbildung bestehenden
sozialen Unterschiede. Die Ergebnisse tendieren dazu, die gem~il3igte Version der
klassischen Theorie im Hinblick auf die Art der Beziehungen zwischen Schule und
Arbeit zu unterstiJtzen. Im Zusammenhang mit dem Konfliktparadigma, stehen die
Daten sowohl einer Spiegelung als auch einer radikalen Kritik an dieser Auffassung entgegen. Vom vergleichenden Standpunkt aus ist die Jugend eine unterpriviligierte Gruppe auf dem Arbeitsmarkt ungeachtet des Geschlechts, des sozial6konomischen Status' und Aufenthaltslandes. Abgesehen von diesen Variationen
sind die Gesellschaften nach Altersgruppen geschichtet.
R6sum6 -- Cette 6tude se focalise sur les exprriences faites par de jeunes adultes
Brasflia dans le secteur tertiaire. Les rrsultats obtenus montrent qu.e la
formation en cours d'emploi et 1'rducation non formelle prrparent les jeunes au
travail, que la scolarit6 est essentiellement un indicateur d'rducabilitC L'entr~e
dans la vie active renforce les diffrrences sociales basres sur le milieu familial et la
scolaritC Les r~sultats tendent /~ appuyer la version mod~rre de la throrie
classique concernant la nature du rapport 6cole/travail. Darts le contexte du
paradigme conflictuel, les donnres vont h l'encontre du reproductionnisme et de la
critique radicale de cette rue. Du point de rue comparatif, les jeunes forment un
groupe drfavoris6 sur le march6 de I'emploi, indiffrremment de leur sexe, de leur
statut socio-rconomique et de leur lieu de rrsidence. Malgr6 ces variations, les
socirtrs sont divisres en groupes d'fige.
International Review of Education -- Internationale Zeitschrifi fiir Erziehungswissenschaft -Revue lnternationale de P~dagogie 36(4): 393--416, 1990. 9 1990 Unesco Institute for
Education and Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
394
At the Vlth World Congress of Comparative Education (Rio de Janeiro
1987), the World Council of Comparative Education Societies approved
an international research program on the education and training of young
adults, from a perspective of technological and occupational change. ~
Considering the urgency of this population's problems, especially in
contexts where there are an elevated level of unemployment, intermittent
employment and changes in occupational structure, this program can be
viewed as being highly relevant. On the one hand, the exchange of
knowledge and experiences should substantially enrich understanding of
the difficulties faced by adolescents and young adults who seek to enter
the world of work. On the other hand, given the differences among the
countries involved, the program is sufficiently flexible to meet the specific
interests and situations of each participating nation. Indeed, a major
concern of this research program relates to the question of public policy;
one of the proposed investigations will be a collection of recommendations that can be put into practice.
In Brazil, the level of knowledge relating to the question is less than
would be desirable. In addition to premature labour market entrance, a
phenomenon which seriously hampers obligatory schooling, one encounters in Brazil symptoms of youth underemployment. Policies concerning
education and vocational training are negatively affected by a lack of
information about the nature of specific realities. The literature review
presented in the following section reveals that research on the subject
leaves many questions unanswered and often fails to focus on crucial
issues of public policy. Also, dependence on a limited number of methodological approaches has restricted the type of question that the studies
are able to address. Thus, it is necessary to promote deeper understanding
through employment of methodologies which until now have been little
utilized and through reliance on a broad theoretical perspective in the
interpretation of reality.
Therefore, the aim of this qualitative study is to clarify issues and to fill
gaps in the literature. This work seeks to capture not only facts and
figures, but also the respondents' perceptions, through a combination of
qualitative and quantitative information. Its basic goal is to analyze the
respondents' entry into the world of work and the development of their
careers to the moment of the data collection. To obtain these ends, this
research focuses on social origins and vocational preparation, as well as
on the role of schooling and vocational preparation for work. In addition
and in light of the data obtained -- some recommendations for educational policies are formulated. Whenever possible, international comparisons are made, with special consideration given to the situation in some
other developing countries.
-
-
395
Entry into Work in Brazil: A Review of the Literature
In Brazil the population tends to enter the labor market early in life, with
either a low level of schooling or no schooling whatsoever. This entry, it is
known, is a crucial moment, having significant repercussions on all aspects
of the individual's active life. The occupational structure has different
portals through which people enter at various levels. One who begins
unfavorably tends to end up in the same situation. Also, there exists the
question of school continuity. Some of the workers remain in school, while
others either leave school even before their entry into the world of work
or terminate their schooling shortly after beginning to work. In this
respect, there exists an old controversy concerning the possibility of
competition between schooling and labor activity. For some, work leads to
school abandonment, whereas for others work is a precondition for
continuation or return to schooling. This controversy is relevant in Brazil
because it relates to the question of a fixed minimum age for working,
legislated by the Federal Constitution.
Without intending an exhaustive review, we consider here a total of 47
studies, which are listed in the Bibliography to this paper, divided into
three groups to facilitate analysis:
-- studies of the work and education of children and adolescents, based
on aggregated data (total: 10);
-- studies of the work and education of children and adolescents of a
quantitative and qualitative nature, focusing on local and regional
levels (total: 23);
-- follow-up studies of the vocational career of graduates (providing
information on the position of individuals in the labor market),
analyses of student groups and other studies (total: 14).
Taking these studies as a whole, there is an extreme predominance of
quantitative (43) over qualitative (4) investigations. The latter are the most
recent, and in only two instances do they incorporate statistical information. The quantitative studies show a healthy tendency to utilize ciata
aggregated on the national level (Censuses, National Household Studies
and the Annual Report of Social Information).
Reflecting the lack of information on the issues in question, a major
portion of the studies are descriptive or exploratory in nature. Although a
number of works are rigorously developed, very few clearly delineate a
theoretical framework and review earlier studies dealing with the same
topic. It is not necessary to emphasize that these failings negatively affect
the critical accumulation of scientific knowledge and the development of
effective public policy.
396
As for the methodologies utilized, the qualitative studies clearly merit
greater attention as they make possible a deeper, more profound analysis.
Naturally, in my opinion, quantitative and qualitative methods should not
be in opposition but should rather complement each other. Since knowledge of national reality is limited, nobody can afford the luxury of failing
to knock at any available door.
In the light of this collection of studies, with its valuable focus, but also
with its serious limitations, what can be concluded concerning the nature
of reality?
In Brazil the population begins to work early, circumscribed by conditions of poverty. Groups are launched into the labor market in successive
9waves. The earliest waves are composed of those from the lowest SES
backgrounds and are directed into the worst positions in the occupational
structure. Since a bad beginning tends to limit subsequent professional
career development, a large part of the economically active population has
its future status strongly tied to the status of its origin. While poor families,
generally engaged in manual work, place their members in the labor
market to augment their scarce family resources, middle level SES families
generally keep their children in school in order to increase the probability
of entering the labor market under favorable condit~ns. In this respect,
families of different SES levels have different priorities for directing their
members to the world of work. In low SES families the head of the family
is the first to work, followed first by children over 18 years of age, then
by children less than 18 (males before females, the oldest before the
youngest), and finally by the female spouse. In families of middle level
SES, however, the female spouse is the second to enter the work force,
preceded only by her male counterpart, with the oldest children following
a rank order from oldest to youngest (males before females).
The least privileged groups, which tend to enter the labor market first,
are males, reside in rural areas and the least developed regions, are from
the lowest SES contingent, have the least amount of schooling, and are
children of manual workers. They comprise the first "wave", entering the
workforce even before the legal minimum age for employment.
In terms of localization within the occupational structure, children and
adolescents tend to work an excessive number of hours per week and
receive low salaries, rarely covered by social security. Their "jobs" are
mainly acquired via informal channels. Their activities are mostly confined
to the primary and tertiary sectors of the economy, which means that the
majority of these individuals are relegated to what is referred to as the
"informal" labor market. Indeed, according to Spindel (1983), for every
child or adolescent working in the formal sector, there were 10 employed
in the informal sector. However, in spite of these precarious working
397
conditions, unemployment among children and adolescents tends to be
significantly greater than that for adults, even in times of prosperity (e.g.,
Barbosa 1975; Oliveira 1976; Souza 1975). Clearly, there is a need to
contribute to the mobility of young people as they search for better
employment. But, according to Spindel (1985), there is a tendency in the
formal sector to continually raise the employment criteria pertaining to
adolescents. Thus, Spindel (1985) concludes that adolescents have become
a discardable form of manpower.
From a sectoriai point of view, the major passageways for labor market
entry in Brazil tend to be through agriculture, commerce and the services.
The first absorbs the children and adolescents with the lowest age, schooling and socio-economic status, whereas the levels of these variables are
somewhat higher in the tertiary sector. In industry, on the other hand,
entry tends to come later, with higher schooling attainments, often
occurring after participation in one of the other areas of the economy. It
can be inferred, therefore, that industry is the economic sector which is
the most selective, in part because of technological factors, and thus it
offers little opportunity for those who fail in school (Gomes 1982, 1983,
1986a).
Formal schooling, at least in the industrial sector, appears to have little
value and, in many respects, its effects do not correspond to those
predicted by human capital theory. One encounters, on the other hand,
some evidence of a positive impact of nonformal education, although this
is probably limited to training which is general in nature (Verhine and
Lehmann 1983; Lehmann and Verhine 1986). Thus, employers seem to
prefer job candidates who are trainable to those who are already trained
(Kuenzer 1985; Salgado 1984). Indeed, the majority of industrial operatives are trained informally, through direct contact with peers and superiors (Gomes 1986a). However, the reality of small firms may be different
from that of large enterprises, in that the former appear to be highly
dependent on workers who are already trained at the time of employment
(Franco 1987).
These considerations lead us to discuss the relations between work ~md
schooling. One established idea is that work jeopardizes school attendance. In fact, the body of available research indicates that it is impossible
to affirm any mechanical relationship between labor and study. No doubt,
certain types of work prevent a young person from going to school,
robbing him of innumerable opportunities. However, in some circumstances working can favor study. Employment in the informal sector,
along with uncertain and poorly paid work in general, especially in
agriculture (particularly when not undertaken in conjunction with the
family) is also a hindrance to continuing school or to re-entry. Work
398
facilitates access to school only for a small, select group, composed of
individuals with stable, formal sector jobs and with family circumstances
which allow them control over most of their earnings. It is also necessary
for the job to not be too strenuous and the workday to be not too long
(Gomes 1986b).
Thus the school, so often pictured as the villain of the story, is not,
according to existing studies, the major source of harm, although it still
deserves at least a portion of the blame. Indeed, a large number of
children drop out of school before working. Moreover, schooling is socioeconomically selective. But, compared with poverty, the school renders
relatively little harm, although its negative impact cannot be ignored. One
notes that an urban industrial society even provides strong incentives for
schooling, such as the concept that the school represents a channel to
social success, the identification of school attendance with the category
"youth" (as opposed to the category "marginal") and evidences, via
salaried work, of situations where schooling is required and emphasized
(e.g., Spindel 1983; Madeira 1984).
Theoretical Perspectives
Since entry into. the world of work is highly significant in the social
stratification process, one can effectively utilize alternative theoretical
perspectives to focus on relations between education, social stratification
and income. Although there is a notable plurality of theoretical viewpoints, one can distinguish two basic perspectives: (1) that of the technical-functional approach and (2) the so-called conflict approach, which
includes an array of Marxist, neo-Marxist and neo-Weberian theories, in
the area of sociology, along with the notion of labor market segmentation,
in economics, among others.
According to the first perspective, technological change constantly
raises the level of skill requirements for jobs and, consequently, the level
of educational requirements is raised also. Through this process, in which
the school serves as an agent for selecting talented people, society moves
towards a state of meritocracy (Clark 1962; Kerr et al. 1960). In addition,
education and training can be forms of investment, augmenting productivity. Thus, the higher the levels of schooling and training, the higher the
income, making education an instrument for social elevation (Schuitz
1961).
This way, schooling is the most important means by which people
attain capacities for work. In the weak version of this perspective, school-
399
ing is a signal of the individual capacity to learn on the job. One of the
theories included in this perspective considers schooling as a trainability
indicator used by employers as a means to select job applicants by cost of
training and other criteria (Thurow 1978). Therefore, the most readily
trainable applicants would be first in the queue. In general, both versions
of this perspective assume that it is relevant for employers to match the
more highly trained or easily trainable people with the more exacting jobs.
While this perspective posits that the educational process consists
basically of obtaining productive skills and knowledge, which leads to
selection based on merit, the conflict orientation views education as being
in great part a perpetuator of social differences. One of the approaches of
this second perspective, the theory of correspondence, sees parental social
class, rather than student abilities, as the major conditionate of schooling.
Upon arriving in school, students confront a process of differential socialization which prepares them for different work environments, transmitting
the skills and forming the attitudes required by the employers (Bowles and
Gintis 1976).
A series of evidences have been produced which place doubt on the
direct relationship between education, on the one hand, and productivity,
income and equality of opportunity, on the other. The role of schooling in
manpower training would, according to these evidences, be less significant
than formerly proclaimed. In line with this reasoning, increases in schooling levels occur as a result of non-economic factors and, in large part,
these are self-induced. Thus, education can be viewed, for example, as a
credential that permits selection of personnel by the dominant status
group, in accordance with socio-cultural characteristics (Collins 1979).
Organizations are considered to be arenas for struggles to acquire goods,
prestige and power, in which education constitutes an element of selection
and control.
This sociological view finds a corresponding perspective in the theory
of labor market segmentation, given that, in accordance with this latter
viewpoint, organizations create different labor markets for different status
groups. For example, Doeringer and Piore (1971) identify two lal~or
markets distinguished from each other by economic characteristics and
worker experiences. In contrast to the secondary labor market, the
primary market tends to involve high salaries, good working conditions,
job stability and opportunities for career advancement. As a consequence,
the role of formal education differs by labor market segment. Because of
rigid structural and behavioral inter-segment barriers, it can do Little
to move workers from one segment to another. Education, therefore,
assumes a dual role: it allocates individuals to occupations as well as to
400
firms and economic areas. These factors circumscribe and mediate the
relationship between education and income (e.g., Kalleberg, Wallace and
Althauser 1981 ).
According to these theoretical positions, it is not crucial for employers
to allocate the more highly trained or easily trainable people to the more
demanding jobs. Schooling is a signal of people's values, attitudes, and
habits. Only secondarily does it function as an indicator of the knowledge
and the skills necessary for work performance.
In Brazil, the conflict perspective has helped focus attention on the
school/work interface. In a critique of reproductionism, Salm (1980)
negates the school's subordination to capital, arguing that the latter is selfsufficient in the training of its workforce. Frigotto (1984), however, has a
less radical view of the school/capital relationship. This linkage is not
direct but, rather, education is a mediator which provides a general
knowledge that is articulated with practical, specific learning developed
through the productive process. Kuenzer (1985), in turn, built on this
point of view, analyzing how the relations of production educate the
Worker. According to her conclusion, workers' knowledge does not go
beyond c o m m o n sense, and, thus, workers should appropriate knowledge
which has been socially produced via the school, as a means of resisting
the strategy of dequalification currently propagated by the school, the firm
and the society. On the other hand, according to Arroyo (1986), although
the worker's right to schooling is important, this represents only a portion
of his right to education. The central problem rests with the negation of
the worker's fight to produced knowledge, to his/her own culture and to
his/her own class identity.
Methodology
This study was focused on eleven firms of the tertiary sector located in
Brasflia, Brazil's capital city. The research approach was qualitative, therefore the firms were not selected to compose a statistically representative
sample of their universe. Instead, they were intentionally selected amongst
each sub-sector's most typical units, as suggested by a group of government officials and businessmen. The sample studied included the following
types of firm: (1) two supermarkets, (2) two car dealers and auto-part
shops, (3) two clothing stores, (4) three hotels and (5) two cleaning
services firms. The group included two small, five medium and four large
enterprises, defined according to the number of employees.
In each firm, employees to be interviewed were randomly selected by
sex and occupational level (high, medium and low). In the total, sixty-eight
401
16-through-31-year-old employees were interviewed. Interviews were
conducted with at least one employer per firm.
Field researchers were graduate students in education, especially
trained for this purpose. Four instruments were used for data collection:
two demographic, general characterization questionnaires (one for employees, one for firms) and two semi-structured interview guides (one for
employees, one for employers). Furthermore, interviewers took field
notes, which were very important for understanding the organizational
context and other features.
Results
Schooling and Youth Career: an Overview
The results reflect the tendency prevalent within the Brazilian population
to enter into the labor market at an early age. This is particularly true for
males. Data show that males start to work at the median age of 1 3.2 years,
whereas the equivalent value for females was 17.2 years (Fig. 1). However,
young men tend to leave school at almost the same average age. This
means that young men study and work at the same time for a longer
Age
/'
2x
/ /
24
/
22
.-
20
I)," "
Md
I"~T_~)'
Ii
(.2 ,/
[
I I II~ffo,"
D,II
'
l)
__J
()~
i
I i
, /
J
~
Md
O,
I)
II
/
kl:~=
[ )'0
~|d -- tilt-dish
I), - I ~ l d c c l l c
I), -- ~lh LIcr
{7
I ~1 quartile
(),
Jrd dccih:
'
I)
4
O,
'''
II
I
/
'/
"
rD '
L
//~'~ -- I~"i__~
~'' / I
()
I~1 /
(~,/
h
/ /
O,
/
/
Idl'"'
i2
/
/
2t~
IO
, I),
2
(I
Sch~xll
Chit)
|.al~r
Cnlr)
l i n d of .chol~l
;it Ir
~ ()tiN(}
Mt~N
Dala
collcclllm
Sch~)l
cnlr)
t.ab~lr
F n d of ~ch,~,ll
Chit)
,lllr162162
YOilN(;
%OMFN
Fig. 1. School attendance and labor entry age by sex.
I)ala
colICclhln
402
period than young women. The decision to work is closely tied to the
questions of age and sex. Age appears to serve as an indicator of physical,
emotional and intellectual development and of the roles that family and
society expect its members to fulfill. According to the interviews, entry
into the world of work is generally improvised, devoid of orientation or
defined plans. Economic difficulties are the primary motive for participation in the labor force, along with a desire for independence. Despite this
desire, however, the working youth tends to remain dependent on his
family. The latter demands a contribution to income,, determines which of
its members should work and establishes informal contacts necessary for
obtaining employment.
The findings also reveal a tendency for youths from more modest
origins to be those who have less schooling and who enter the labor
market at the earliest age and in the lowest positions. As Fig. 2 shows, the
higher the occupational level, the earlier the beginning of school attendance and the longer the time of such an attendance. At the low occupational level, youths have lower median labor entry age -- 13.2 years --, in
contrast with 15.7 years for high and medium levels. (The legal minimum
age for employment was then 12.) However, independently of social
situation, the working youth experiences a form of rite of passage, often
starting to work under conditions of exploitation which defy labor legisla-
Age
O,
,1
// I[I
:"
II
///
2a
~/ J
] MO
."
Md
O,
20
)
"
III
Iq~
~ "
.
O~
,, LTM,, T,;
I
12
Io
/
X
/
~
f,
Md
4
I),
I),
/
"
/
I),,/
/
.
L.:),"
/
'~
,~
II
('1), / /
l~ o
/ "
Md '
,"
/~
,
~ D,
[-
I),
KI'Y
MO -D, O~ -O, - O, -
[),
2
mcdmn
i~ldecilc
91h dcclh"
Isl quarlilc
MdquarHIc
II
Sch,~fl
Lab~)r
cnlr)
cnley
HIGH
End o| ~chool
at tl~ndancc
& Mb. D I U M
Data
Sch(nfl
collcclion
entry
LEVELS
Labor
cnlr)
[_OW
End of ~r
attendance
l)ala
coIlccilon
LEVELS
Fig. 2. School attendance and labor entry age by occupational level.
403
tion. In this context, open unemployment is low, since the young people
constitute cheap and frequently submissive manpower. Thus, exploitation
and the relative ease of access to work go hand in hand, meaning that
youth employment often means youth underemployment.
Analysis of the schooling trajectory indicates that respondents from the
lowest social strata experience high rates of school repetition and dropout. They spend an average of 1.3 years in each grade, and leave school
earlier than any other group. Place of residence strongly influences access
to schooling, and the quality of education experienced is affected by both
residential and SES circumstances. Reacting to social and family demands,
respondents tend to enter the labor market without completing a given
schooling level or participating in a program for vocational preparation.
Youths less favored socially tend to terminate their studies prematurely,
whereas the rest, particularly those who have reached a high occupational
position, often spend several years working and studying simultaneously.
In confronting the research findings with those in the literature, one
notes that the characteristics of the sample are similar to those of young
people in Brazil and in the Third World in general. Contrary to what is
observed in advanced capitalist countries, compulsory education is short,
a great part of the population does not complete basic instruction and
large numbers of children and adolescents begin to work before the legal
minimum age. Many young people who remain in school obtain a poor
education because they also work. Moreover, most young people, especially those from low SES backgrounds, choose their work at random,
without career plans or adequate vocational guidance. This last tendency,
incidentally, is also evident in developed countries. It appears, therefore,
that even in distinct social contexts, those who enter work early tend to
occupy the lowest rungs of the job structure and thus suffer disadvantages
vis-h-vis the other age groups in society (Lipset, Bendix and Maim 1955;
Carter 1966; Parnes et at. 1969; Maizels 1970; Kohen et al. 1977).
How Young People Learn Their Work
Most of the sample subjects did not learn their occupation in school. The
role of schooling was limited to indicating the trainability of the job
candidate. In high level occupations, the work was generally learned on
the job from direct observation or with supervisors, colleagues and
parents (when the last worked in or owned the firm). The respondents
learned by doing, through trial and error. In a chain of clothing stores, inservice training followed a structured routine: every new salesperson
received orientation from a more senior employee. The sales commissions
were given to the veteran until the novice had learnt his/her job, which
404
was usually expected to take up to two months. In the study, the area of
sales was that in which this form of structured training was most commonplace. Sample members also took in-firm courses in the fields of administration and auto mechanics.
Other sources of learning included work in the informal sector and
family enterprises, as well as short duration courses (typing, data processing, etc.) offered by private establishments, religious groups, and by
SENAC, a nationwide vocational training agency geared to the tertiary
sector. Employers, followed by the employees themselves, were those
most likely to assume responsibility for the financing of these nonformal
educational experiences.
The school's contribution was general education. Its distance from the
world of work was severely criticized by employees and employers.
Secondary level vocational programs appeared to be ineffective and
divorced from practice. In this context, the sector of accounting deserves
special mention. Although an area that employs a relatively large number
of people, offers jobs of responsibility and is professionally regulated,
most of those involved learned accounting through practice. Many
obtained secondary level diplomas after beginning to work, for the
purpose of obtaining certification. At least one firm in the study had
problems with professional inspectors and had to pay fines because
employees who did accounting "de facto" were not formally registered.
For example, one accounting assistant, then 23 years old, stated that he
learned his occupation with a colleague and supervisor, because he had
taken a poor accounting course in a private school in which students "pay
to pass".
These results are in agreement with those from other studies which
indicate that in-service training is an excellent way for workers to acquire
occupational skills (Gomes 1986a). This is especially true in the tertiary
sector, where tasks are relatively simple, a factor explaining why this area
often serves as a port of entry for young people and migrants. This
simplicity differentiates the tertiary sector from the secondary, in that the
latter tends to value both job experience and formal vocational preparation (Pastore and Assis 1979; Leite and Caillods 1985).
Even in economies that are more mechanized than the Brazilian,
technical skills for the majority of occupations are learned on the job, in a
relatively easy and rapid fashion. Most workers without college experience
acquired their skills informally in this way (Berg 1970).
Thus, as will be shown in the following section, the opinions of workers
and employers tend to converge in the sense that both groups consider
schooling more as an indicator of trainability than as purveyor of immediately applicable productive capabilities. However, criticism suggests that
405
these groups expect school to play a more active role in the preparation
for work. Furthermore, there is no evidence in the study that schooling is
utilized as a filter or credential, that it signals socio-cuitural characteristics
or abilities generally associated with a given school level or with the
educational institutions frequented by the job candidates.
Evaluating the School
The responses of the employees indicate a tendency to value general
education, in its informative as well as formative aspects. Asked about the
contribution of the school, most of the sample members negated its direct
effect on work performance. Yet, they widely recognized relevant indirect
effects of general education. This behavior is understandable considering
that, as a rule, the respondents learned their work in-service and tended to
be critical of school vocationalization.
The school influence mentioned by interviewees with by far the greatest
frequency pertained to the acquisition of reading, writing and calculating
abilities. This was particularly true for respondents in low-level occupations. The positive statements focused on general education as a whole,
particularly attitudes, behaviors and abilities linked to social relationships
and preparation in general. An example is the declaration of a manager
who began his career as a salesman: "The school helps in making the
student literate and aware of today's world reality, but it is of no direct
help for work."
The statement of a manicurist, then studying at the secondary level,
indicates recognition of the school's influence for the performance of her
job and for circulation in social contexts: "Many times I do nails at
embassies and at the Lake (high class residential area). There I need to
converse, read, write, and change money."
Some respondents emphasize the ability to calculate (particularly sales
people) and to communicate orally and in writing. One woman in the area
of automobile sales said: "The school taught me to speak. Without
knowing Portuguese there is no way that I can work."
Taking into account the clientele with whom this informant works, "to
speak" means not only fluency but also the use of correct grammar, or, in
other words, the utilization of a "social dialect" different from that of her
social origins. As with the example of the manicurist, mentioned above,
the school appears as an institution that familiarizes or integrates its
participants with the dominant culture. Such a role is certainly selective
and induces student failure. But, in this research, what stands out are
those who overcome the barriers and become a part of the urban salaried
labor market.
406
Other subjects focused on such schooling effects as ease of social
interaction and the fostering of positive moral attitudes in regard to work:
The school helped me relate better. When I arrived from the interior I
was very shy (office assistant).
The school teaches you to deal with people (warehouse assistant).
There (in school) we learn, principally to mix with the public. We learn
to converse with people (hotel messenger).
It is interesting to note that despite its deficiencies and, in many instances,
its strong content emphasis, the school, in the opinion of those interviewed, provides opportunities for the development of social attitudes and
skills, especially among those of low SES. Such effects should be credited
in part to the fact that the school constitutes a social group which is
broader than the family, with distinct norms of social relationship and
offering, therefore, a particular means of socialization. It is clear, then, that
the school serves to inculcate values. Indeed, some of the statements in
this respect suggest a predominantly conservative bias.
The col~gio (high school) teaches discipline and respect and this helps
(office assistant).
Saturday a co!league of mine said a swear word and her boss asked if
she had gone to school and if she had learned this sort of thing there. I
don't think so, the school helped me to behave, to be polite (supermarket boxer).
Among the criticisms of the school that most stand out are the deficiencies
in vocational education, as already mentioned. This point is primarily
made by those in occupations requiring the secondary level. Also emphasized is the gap between the school in general and work, as well as
between theory and practice:
The school helped me in everything. The theory was good, one learns
the practice on the job (supermarket boxboy).
The school did not show how things were going to be in the outside
world. This is only learned in daily life (bill collector).
The school teaches one thing and when we go into the world it is
something else (supermarket attendant).
The school, therefore, is seen as an artificial institution divorced from
work and life, a place where the student can obtain a view of the world
407
which is partially false, a place where theory is not adequately associated
with practice. This discontinuity, against which many schools of educational thought have fought, continues to represent a major challenge.
Examining the data from the angle of occupational level, it is evident
that positive evaluations of schooling decrease as we move from upper to
lower level occupations. For the latter group, tasks were relatively simple
and learned on the job, so that schooling was not important, even in terms
of requirements for initial entry. An illustrative example of the tendency to
value schooling more further up the occupational hierarchy is the declaration of a manager of a middle-size company concerning his career. In
beginning at age thirteen as a servant, he affirmed that "the school had no
influence whatsoever". However, when later serving as an office assistant
his education to that point, in his opinion, was absolutely necessary. His
promotion to inspector and operations manager, though, was mainly due
to accumulated experience: "You need knowledge from school, but this is
not the most important thing for job performance".
In relation to non-manual occupations, a concern with training costs
seems to make prior experience a criterion more relevant than schooling.
However, a portion of the firms in the sample preferred to establish
minimum schooling requirements and to train those admitted in-service,
leading in turn to successive promotions, because, in filling openings,
priority is given to the firm's employees. In this case, the company initially
paid lower salaries than the market level and worked to intensify employee
loyalty. Available information makes it possible to assume that the firms
paying the lowest initial salaries give priority to schooling as an entry
requirement and prefer to transfer to their employees at least the major
part of the relatively high in-service training costs. Firms paying higher
salaries in beginner positions, on the other hand, tend to place more value
on prior experience than on schooling and to minimize company training.
As for the workers in manual occupations, the companies tend not to
set rigid educational requirements because they assume that the required
skills are not learned in school. Several of these firms gave priority to
candidates with no previous experience in the area. According to fhe
manager of one clothing store, "this approach is preferable in order to
avoid vices". Or, in the words of the manager of a supermarket, "You
mold the unit according to the standards of the enterprise. When he
already has some experience, the unit arrives full of vices. This creates
difficulties between boss and worker because of the turnover among firms
in the sector."
On the other hand, the manager of a large clothing store focused on the
role of schooling as an indicator of trainability, giving also indirect atten-
408
tion to the effect of social origins: "The person who has studied has an
easier time learning the job that he is going to perform . . . Education at
home is important but it has to be polished by the school."
In general, a utilitarian view of the school prevails, more so among
employers than among employees. This view corresponds to the perception that work is merchandise for sale. The most common view of the
contribution of school to work is related to the skills, knowledge and
attitudes that the school offers or could offer to the performance of
concrete tasks. The majority of informants see the theory-practice relationship merely as an improvement of the process of worker preparation
in the sense of "selling" better quality and more expensive merchandise.
Confronting these affirmations with the literature confirms the relevance
of trainability. As for developed countries, similar employer criticism has
been registered concerning the lack of linkage between curriculum and the
world of work, the inadequacy of school training in basic skills and a
consequent lack of preparation of young people for employment (Noah
and Eckstein 1988). Another analysis has highlighted the expectation of a
non-cognitive schooling contribution, as well as the importance of communication skills (Oxenham 1988). In general, employers do not seem to
desire to hire workers who are fully trained.
In developing countries the profile appears not unlike that described
here. Similar structural factors are evident. Schooling is considered an
important criterion in hiring for high and middle level occupations,
especially by m o d e m enterprises. Work experience is viewed as the most
relevant admission criterion for nonskilled jobs (Hallak and Caillods
198 I; Hallak et al. 1981; Atangana-Mebara, Martin and Ngoc 1984).
Thus, the literature confirms a tendency to consider schooling a relevant
criterion in job selection only for skilled occupations.
Conclusion
From the comparative standpoint, youth is an underprivileged group in
the labor market, regardless of sex, SES and country of residence. It seems
that, even in developed societies, this group is submitted to a sort of rite of
passage, since it obtains many of the relatively worst positions of the
occupational structure. Unemployment, underemployment, low salaries,
no legal labor contracts, dull jobs and bad working conditions are some
facets of this ordeal. Sex, SES and country of residence may make the
transition easier. However, despite these variations, societies are stratified
by age groups. In fact, social stratification is a complex result of the
interaction amongst multiple factors.
409
Early this century industrialization led to the definition of a new age in
Western Europe and the United States: adolescence. Children and teenagers became unwelcome at work. They were to study and to prepare for
the adult role. In the last decades one can distinguish in advanced
capitalist societies a new introductory state to full adulthood, that of the
young adult. Vulnerable to unemployment, he/she represents a challenge
to society. In contrast, in a developing society such as that of Brazil, one
can find at the same time young adulthood, adolescence and, in some
rural areas, the straight passage from childhood to adulthood. Moreover,
such a coexistence may occur in a single person. Children and teenagers at
the same time may have working conditions analogous to those of
England in the early nineteenth century, whereas they may be submitted
to the contemporary patterns of adolescence in a mass society. Therefore,
their complex rite of passage has a great amount of storm and stress.
Despite these particular features, though, another common characteristic of youth in their struggle to participate in the labor force seems to
be the fact that entry into work reinforces social differences in family
background and schooling. Such a finding is clear for Brazil and some
other countries. The key role played by entry into labor is a result of its
importance for the social stratification process.
In fact, current theoretical perspectives of labor market participation
and social stratification help to clarify youth labor problems. In the light of
the observations of this research, such theoretical perspectives lead to
interesting conclusions on relations between education and work. The
findings give modest support to the technical-function perspective. Schooling and education in general are viewed by respondents as indicators of
trainability. As has been seen, various firms prefer to establish minimum
educational requirements for training and promoting employees. Others
require professional experience, using schooling as a secondary criterion
and saving on in-service training costs. In this sense, whereas the classical
approach in its most extreme version tends to be refuted, the more
moderate view that relates schooling to trainability receives support from
the data. In addition, the tendency to give greater value to schooling .the
more complex the occupation reiterates that schooling may be seen as a
process for acquiring job competencies.
In terms of manpower preparation as well as of job selection and
acquisition, the evidence does not suggest a process of rational decisionmaking. Initial selection of career is based on improvisation and disinformation, and choices are irrational and often harmful to personal
interests.
In the context of the conflict paradigm, the responses run contrary to
both reproductionism and the radical critique of this view. While the
410
school is seen ,as having a conservative tendency, it is subjected to strong
criticism by employers for not meeting expectations, either in general
education or in vocational instruction. Thus, it is not possible to establish
a direct school-society relationship in which the interests of firms or of
dominant groups are served. The school-society linkage is indirect and
sinuous, so that the schooling institution apparently assumes a posture
which is relatively autonomous.
It is not possible to deny totally the existence of ties between the school
and certain enterprise demands. The role of the school institution is that
of mediator, responsible above all for administering general "theoretical"
education that articulates with practical learning acquired within the
company. But, from the viewpoint of many employees and especially
employers, this linkage in fact is unsati,sfactory.
The results, therefore, tend to support the moderate version of classical
theory with regard to the nature of school/work relationships. It should be
remembered, however, that the study considered only private, profitseeking firms which share at least some degree of rationale. It is not
known whether the findings would be replicated if the focus were, instead,
on the largest employer in the capital city: the Federal Government.
Some Implications for Educational Poficy
The educational reform of 1971 sought to overcome the dualistic nature
of academic and vocational instruction in Brazil, by making vocationalization obligatory at the secondary level. Unlike Argentina, which attempted
similarly to introduce compulsory secondary technical instruction in the
same decade (Gallart 1988), Brazil encountered strong student resistance
to its project and had to return to the dual structure eleven years later.
One of the major problems was that, because of the selectivity of the
school system, most of the students who were successful in reaching
the secondary level aspired to become more than "just" a middle level
technician.
The responses obtained in this research show that a large part of the
young people who do not reach the secondary level desire to obtain
vocational skills but have limited opportunities in this respect. Clearly, the
process of overcoming the dual character of schooling, in Brazil as well
as in other countries, is not easy, but the democratization of educational opportunities would certainly be facilitated through the following
measures:
-- an emphasis on general education
democratization of access to vocational instruction
-
-
411
better articulation between the school and vocationalization
-- consideration of work as more than merchandise for sale
-
-
The importance attributed by employers and employees to general
education indicates that this form of instruction possesses relevant germinative effects and prepares students to adapt flexibly to an unknown
future. Thus, general instruction should be strengthened but the school
must also continue to give attention to vocational education. The importance of trainability does not mean that in-service training is universally
adequate. Many occupations require training outside the firm, and, in
certain instances, respondents' expectations of the value of general education were the result more of a realistic adjustment to the precarious nature
of the school system than of a perception of real needs. According to
estimates made by Castro and Fletcher (1985), the two urban systems of
vocational training (SENAI and SENAC) and the federal technical
schools then reached only 14 per cent of the potential clientele. Many
young people with low incomes are obliged to pay for private courses
because of a lack of alternatives (see also Paro 1981). Considering that
there are comparative advantages to a diversity of forms of work preparation, depending on region, economic sector and occupational group, it is
necessary to expand these opportunities both in school (when actually
feasible) and outside it. It is not defensible to remove from the school
those vocational alternatives that are shown to be effective. The spectrum
of options should be broad and offered at diverse school levels in order to
facilitate access.
In addition, articulation between the school and the process of manpower training is urgent, without this meaning bureaucratic centralization
or attempts to predict worker supply and demand. Public policies referring to education and to work should be intimately related, reflecting a
two-way movement between schools and agencies for human resource
development. Major priority should be given to vocational information, in
that the contribution of schooling in this respect, despite its legal obligation, has been virtually nonexistent, as indicated by our data. Finally, work
preparation must be conceived as broader than just the acquisition of
knowledge and skills for executing tasks. Work constitutes a process that
involves man's participation in society and it includes transformational
actions on nature and history. The concept must be understood within a
social context in which the notion of citizenship receives emphasis.
Moreover, a fundamental issue relating to the democratization of
instruction concerns the fact that the school is biased against the less
privileged social groups. Although these groups need to master the school
curriculum, they usually find this curriculum to be based on a culture that
412
is foreign to them. It is necessary, therefore, to take into a c c o u n t the
peculiarities of these g r o u p s and orientate schooling so that it serves their
interests. O t h e r w i s e school failure will c o n t i n u e to have p e r v e r s e effects
on students.
Note
1.
Research project sponsored by the Ministry of Education and the Brazilian
Comparative Education Society. The views expressed are those of the author
and should not be attributed to the sponsors or the institution with which he
is affiliated.
References
Antuniassi, Maria Helena R. 1983. Trabalhador inJantil e t'scohwica~'6o no meio
rural. Rio: Zahar.
Aratijo, Dalton M., ed. 1968. Destino profissional de ex-ahtnos do SENAC. Rio:
SENAC.
,Arroyo, Miguel. 1986 9 O direito do trabalhador "~ educaqfio. Confer&ncia
Brasileira de Educaqfio. Amiis. Goifinia.
Atangana-Mebara, J.-M., J.-Y. Martin, and Ta Ngoc C. 1984. ~-ducation, emploi
et salaire au Cameroun. Paris: Unesco-IIPE.
Barbosa, Milton. 1975. Influ4neia da idade no mercado de trabalho. Boletim
Econ6mico do IPEA (4/5) Jul./Oct.: 15-17.
Berg, Ivar. 1970. Education and JoBs: 7he Great Training Robber3,. New York:
Praeger.
Bessa, N/cia M., ed. 1971. Ahlnos do curso colegial: pianos e caracteristicas
s6cio-econ6micas. Rio: Fundaqfio Getulio Vargas.
Bilac, Elisabete D. 1978. Familias de trabalhadores: estralOgias de sobreviv6ncia, a
organizaqfio da vida familiar em uma cidade paulista. Silo Paulo: Simbolo.
Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis. 1976 9 Schooling in Capitalist America:
Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic
Books 9
Brasil. 1981. Secretaria de Planejamento da Presid4ncia da Reptiblica. Fundaqfio
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica. For~'a de trabalho no Brasil: uma
anfilise de mobilidade ocupacional. Rio: IBGE.
9 1982. Secretaria de Planejamento da Presid4ncia da Reptiblica. Fundaqfio
lnstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatfstica. Perfil estatistico de criang'as e m6es
no Brasil: caracterfsticas s6cio-demogrfificas: 1970-1977. Rio: I B G E / U N I C E F .
91983. Distrito Federal 9 Secretaria de Serviqos Sociais. Fundaq~o de Serviqo
Social 9 SobrevivEncia: aspectos das condi~:6es de vida de menores trabalhadores
de rua do Distrito Federal 9Brasflia: Governo do Distrito Federal.
413
Caldeira, CI6vis. 1960. Menores no meio rural: trabalho e escolarizaq~o. Rio:
Minist6rio da Educar
e Cultura.
Carter, Michael. 1966. Into Work. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Castro, Cl~iudio de Moura and Philip R. Fletcher. 1985. Ensino, treinamento
profissional e mercado de trabalho: a situaq:~o do jovem no Brasil. Brasllia:
lnstituto de Planejamento Econ6mico e Social/Instituto de Planejamento/Centro
National de Recursos Humanos.
Clark, Burton R. 1962. Educating the Expert Socie~. San Francisco: Chandler.
Collins, Randall. 1979. The Credential Society: an Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic.
Demartini, Zeila B. F. 1983. Educando para o trabalho. In: Brasil, Ministfrio da
Educaq~o e Cultura. Anais do Semin6rio Educacdo no Meio Rural. Brasflia:
Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais (196-209).
Dias, Jos6 A. el al. 1967. Ensino m~dio e esmttttra sfcio-econOmica. N.p.:
Minist6rio da Educa~ao e cultura.
Doeringer, Peter B. and Michael J. Piore, 1971. Internal Labor Markets attd
Manpower Analysis. Lexington, Massachusetts: Heath.
Fukui, Lia, Efig6nia Sampaio, and Lucila Brioshi. 1983. Escolarizaq~o e sociedade: um estudo dos excluidos da escola. In: Brasil, Ministe~rio da Educaqfio e
Cultura. Anais do Semin6rio Educa~'do no Meio Rural. Brasflia: lnstituto Nacional
de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais (210-23).
1985. A questfio do trabalho infantil na grande imprensa paulista na
d6cada de 71). Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedag6gicos, 66 (152) Jan#Apr.: 2846.
Franco, Maria Laura P. B. 1987. Educaq~o t6cnica face /t din/lmica de transformaq~o da sociedade brasileira. Semin6rio Latino-Americano: Em busca de
urea nova estrutura educativa. Salvador: Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Frigotto, Gaudfincio. 1984. A produtividade da escola improdutiva: tim (re)exame
das relafbes entre educafdo e estrutura econOmico-social capitalista. S~o Paulo:
Cortez.
Gallart, Maria Antonia. The Secondarization of Technical Education in Argentina
and the Vocationalization of Secondary Education in Brazil. In: Lauglo, Jon and
Kevin Lillis, eds. 1988. Vocationalizing Education: an International Perspective
(203-18). Oxford: Pergamon.
Gomes, Candido A. C. 1982. O ingresso da populaqfio brasileira na forqa de
trabalho: estudo preliminar da PNAD 1976. Ci~ncia e Cultura 34( 1) Jan.: 74-76.
1983. O ingresso da populaqfio na forc;a de trabalho do Brasil. Boletim
Tdcnico do SENA C 9(3) Sep./Dec.: 149-65.
1986a. Escolaridade e treinamento do oper~irio industrial no Brasil.
CiEncia e Cultura 38(9) Sep.: 1496-1505.
--.
1986b. Trabalho do menor: realidade e ordem legal. Revista de Informafdo
Legislativa 23(92) Oct./Dec.: 349-72.
414
Gouveia, Apa.recida J. 1983. O trabalho do menor: necessidade transfigurada em
virtude. Cadernos de Pesquisa (44) Feb.: 55-62.
Gouveia, Aparecida J. and Robert J. Havighurst. 1969. Ensino mOdio e desenvolvimento. Silo Paulo: Melhoramentos/USP.
Gradvohl, Marta M, B. 1980. O trabalho do menor no setor informal. Fortaleza:
Governo do Estado do Cearfi, Instituto de Planejamento.
Guidi, Maria Lais M. and Srrgio G. Duarte. 1976. Escolaridade e mdo-de-obra
industrial e comercial no Rio de Janeiro. Rio: Minist&io da Educa~:fio e Cultura.
Hailak, Jacques and Franqoise Caillods. 1981. Education, formation et secteur
traditionnel. Paris: Unesco.
Hallak, Jacques et al. 1981. l~ducation, travail et emploi, Vol. 1. Paris: Unesco.
Iutaka, Sugiyama and E. Wilbur Bock. Determinants of occupational status in
Brazil. In: Miiller, Walter and Karl M. Ulrich. 1973. Social Stratification and
Career Mobility (213-22). Paris: Mouton.
Kalleberg, Arne L., lvlichael Wallace and Robert P. Althauser. 1981. Economic
Segmentation, Worker Power and Income Inequality 9 American Journal of
Sociology 87(3) Nov.: 651-83.
Kerr, Clark et al. 1960. Industrialism and Industrial Man: the Problems of Labor
and Management in Economic" Growth. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kohen, Andrew I. et al. 1977. Career Thresholds: a Longitudinal Study of the
Educational and Labor Market Experience of Young Men. Washington, D.C.:
U.S. Department of Labor.
Kuenzer, Acacia Z. 1985. A pedagogia da frbrica." as re&ffes de produfdo e a
educafdo do trabalhador. S~o Paulo: Cortez.
Lehmann, Rainer H. and Robert E. Verhine. 1986. Educaqho e obtenqgto de
empregos industriais no Brasil: para um modelo causal aprimorado. Pesquisa e
Planejamento EconOmico 16(3) Dec.: 621-46.
Leite, Elenice M. 1983. Os tOcnicos formados pelo SENAI: an~ilise das variaq6es
de sal~irio. Sao Paulo: SENAI.
Leite, Elenice M. and Franqoise Caillods. 1985. Educar
na pequena empresa. S~o Paulo: SENAI.
treinamento e emprego
Lima, M~ircia H. 1980. Os tOcnicos formados pelo SENAI: motivafOes para a
escolha do curso e ocupafdo. S~o Paulo: SENAI.
Lipset, Seymour M., Reinhard Bendix and F. Theodore Maim. 1955. Job Plans
and Entry into the Labor Market. Social Forces 33(3) Mar.: 224-32.
Machado Neto, Zahid6. 1979. Meninos trabalhadores. Cadernos de Pesquisa (31)
Dec.: 95-101.
9 1980. As meninas -- sobre o trabalho da crianqa e da adolescente na
famflia proletriria. Ci~ncia e Cultura 32(6) Jun.: 684-90.
Madeira, Felfcia R. 1984. A combinaq~o escola/trabalho entre crianqas e
adolescentes na Cidade de S~o Paulo: atividades excludentes? Complementares?
Ou ambas as coisas? Paper presented at the Associaq~o Nacional de P6sGraduaq~o e Pesquisa em Ci6ncias SociaJs Annual Meeting, Aguas de S~o Pedro.
415
Maizels, Joan. 197(I. Adolescent Needs and the Transition from School to Work.
London: University of London/The Athlone Press.
Molina, Mafia Ignez G. et al. 1983. Escolarizaqdo no meio rural Sio Paulo:
Secretaria da Educaqfio/Fundaqfio de Estudos Agrfirios Luiz de Queiroz.
Neves, Evaristo M. and Mafia Ignez G. Molina. 1984. O ensino e a escola no
meio rural em Sio Paulo. Paper presented at the Associa~fio Nacional de PfsGraduaqio e Pesquisa em Ci~ncias Sociais Annual Meeting. Aguas de S~o Pedro.
Noah, Harold J. and Max A. Eckstein. Business and Industry Involvement with
Education in Britain, France and Germany. In: Lauglo, Jon and Kevin Lillis, eds.
1988. Vocationalizing Education: an International Perspective (45-68). Oxford:
Pergamon.
Oliveira, Luiz A. P. 1976. Consideraqfes sobre a forCa-de-trabalho jovem e o
desenvolvimento econ6mico: o caso de Sio Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Estat~tica
37(147) Jul./Sep.: 271-88.
Oxenham, John. What do Employers Want from Education? In: Lauglo, Jon and
Kevin Lillis, eds. 1988. Vocationalizing Education: an International Perspective
(69-80). Oxford: Pergamon.
Parnes, Herbert S. et al. 1969. Labor Market Experience of Non-College Youth: a
Longitudinal Analysis. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, Center for Human
Resource Research.
Paro, Vftor H. 1981. A propfsito do ensino profissional livre no Estado de Sio
Paulo. Cadernos de Pesquisa (36) Feb.: 27-40.
Pastore, JosC 1979. Desigualdade e mobilidade social no BrasU. Silo Paulo: T.A.
Queiroz/USP.
Pastore, Jos6 and Marisa de Assis. 1979. Resultados de ttma avaliafdo da
formafdo profisional. Sio Paulo: SENAI, Departamento Regional de Sio Paulo.
Salgado, Mafia de Jesus P. et al. 1985. Menor trabalhador. Brasflia: Universidade
de Brasflia.
Salgado, Mafia Umbelina C. 1984. As determinantes das funr
das unidades de
treinamento na siderurgia. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Salm, Cliudio D. 1980. Escola e trabalho. Silo Paulo: Braziliense.
Schrader, Achim et al. 1973. Oferta e procura educacional. Porto Alegre:
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Schultz, Theodore W. 1961. Investment in Human Capital. American Economic
Review 51 (Mar.): 1 - 1 7 .
Serviqo Nacional de Aprendizagem Comercial. 1986. Quem ~ o ahmo do
S E N A C ? Rio: SENAC.
Serviqo Nacional de Aprendizagem Industrial. 1980, Acompanhamento
concluintes: torneiro, a]ustador, fresador e soldador. Rio: SENAI/DRRJ/DPA.
1980. Os t~cnicos formados pelo SENAI: urea apreciar
inserqdo no mercado de trabalho. Sio Paulo: SENAI/DRSP.
de
sobre sua
Silva, Mafia Peregrino da and Maria Ignez G. Molina. 1984. Irabalho agn'cola do
menor na cafeicultura e sua interfer~ncia no processo educativo. Paper presented
416
at the Associa~o Nacional de P6s-Graduaq~o e Pesquisa em Ci6ncias Sociais
Annual Meeting. Aguas de S~o Pedro.
Souza, Maria Cristina C. 1975. O menor trabalhador no Municfpio de S~o Paulo.
Boletim E c o n 6 m i c o do I P E A (6) Nov./Dec.: 31-43.
Spindel, Cheiwa R. 1983. Menores trabalhadores no mercado formal: educaq~o e
trabalho. Paper presented at the Associaq~o Nacional de P6s-Graduaq~o e
Pesquisa em Ci6ncias Sociais Annual Meeting. Aguas de S~o Pedro.
--.
1985a. O m e n o r trabalhador: u m assalariado registrado. Sho Paulo: Nobel/
Minist6rio do Trabalho.
--.
1985b. O m e n o r trabalhador e a reprodufdo da pobreza. Brasflia: ILO.
Thurow, Lester C. Education and Economic Equality. In: Karabel, Jerome and A.
H. Halsey, eds. 1978. Power and Ideolo~,,y in Education (325-35). New York:
Oxford University Press.
Verhine, Robert E. and Rainer H. Lehmann. 1983. Obtenq~o de emprego
industrial comofunq~o de educaq~o n~o-formal: um estudo de oper~rios em duas
cidades do Nordeste. Cadernos de Pesquisa (47) Nov.: 53-63.
Zylberstajn, H61io, Carmen S. Pagotto and Jos6 Pastore. 1985. A mulher e o
m e n o r n a f o r f a de trabalho. Silo Paulo: Nobel/Minist6rio do Trabalho.