Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng
Modelling of far-infrared irradiation in paddy drying process
Naret Meeso
b
a,*
, Adisak Nathakaranakule b, Thanid Madhiyanon c,
Somchart Soponronnarit b
a
Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Eastern University, Khonkaen 40000, Thailand
School of Energy and Materials, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
c
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mahanakorn University of Technology, Bangkok 10530, Thailand
Received 27 August 2005; accepted 4 January 2006
Available online 2 March 2006
Abstract
The set of coupled heat and mass transfer equations are developed to predict the effect of far-infrared irradiation in a series paddy
drying process, comprising fluidized bed drying, transport of paddy, far-infrared irradiation, tempering and ambient air ventilation. Two
layers inside a paddy grain, i.e. a penetrating layer and a conductive layer, were introduced in the development. Comparison results
showed that the model predicted results agreed well with the experiments within the maximum differences in the average paddy moisture
content and temperature of 2.5% d.b. and 5 C, respectively. Furthermore, the model was capable of reasonably predicting the temperature and moisture distributions inside a paddy grain.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Drying process; Far-infrared irradiation; Fluidized bed; Modelling
1. Introduction
Some paddy drying processes in Thai rice mills have
been continuously developed over the past decade. A
two-stage drying technique is widely used with various
types of dryer, such as fluidized bed dryer, the Louisiana
State University (LSU) dryer, cross-flow dryer, recirculation batch dryer, cooling bin and tempering bin (Meeso,
Soponronnarit, & Wetchacama, 1999; Soponronnarit,
1995). This technique, however, is not completely effective
because it still damages paddy qualities, such as head rice
yield and whiteness. To improve the qualities, the suitable
paddy drying process in some Thai rice mills is proposed by
Soponronnarit, Wetchacama, Swasdisevi, and Poomsa-ad
(1999) and Poomsa-ad, Soponronnarit, Prachayawarakron, and Terdyothin (2002), and it is proved to be successful in the commercial scale. The process is divided into two
drying stages i.e. fast drying in the first stage using fluidized
*
Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +662 470 8663.
E-mail address:
[email protected] (N. Meeso).
0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.003
bed dryer and slow drying in the second stage using
ambient air ventilation with tempering between two drying
stages. Under this paddy drying process, Poomsa-ad,
Soponronnarit, Terdyothin, and Prachayawarakron (2001)
suggested that the moisture content of paddy after the first
drying stage should not be reduced lower than 22.5% dry
basis and then followed by tempering for 30 min before
ventilating with ambient air in order to maintain head rice
yield.
Due to the limitation of the moisture reduction of paddy
in the first drying stage, the application of far-infrared radiation was introduced in the paddy drying process because
this electromagnetic wave is capable of directly penetrating
into the product and being absorbed by molecules of product. The absorbed energy activates interaction between
molecules of the product causing heat generated inside
(Ginzburg, 1969; Sandu, 1986; Sakai & Hanzawa, 1994).
Meeso, Nathakaranakule, Madhiyanon, and Soponronnarit (2004) applied far-infrared irradiation in multi-stage
paddy drying process, composing fluidized bed drying,
far-infrared irradiation, tempering, and ambient air ventilation, respectively. Their results revealed that far-infrared
1249
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
Nomenclature
A
cp
Deq
D
F
hfg
hm
hc
k
M
Mw
M
qr,FIR
qr,FIRg
qleakage
qloss
q_ G
r
R
R1
RH
T
Tabs
v
V
surface area, m2
specific heat, J/kg K
equivalent diameter of grain, m
diffusion coefficient, m2/s
view factor
latent heat of vaporization, J/kg
mass transfer coefficient, m/s
heat transfer coefficient, W/m2 K
thermal conductivity, W/m K
moisture content, decimal d.b.
moisture content, decimal w.b.
average moisture content, decimal d.b.
FIR transfer rate from FIR heater, W
FIR transfer rate to grain, W
energy leakage, W
energy loss, W
FIR heat generation, W/m3
radial distance, m
grain radius, m; thermal resistance, C/W; universal gas constant, kJ/kmol K
grain radius of conductive layer; m
relative humidity, decimal
temperature, C
absolute temperature, K
air velocity, m/s
volume of grain, m3
Dimensionless numbers
Le
Lewis number
NuD
Nusselt number
Pr
Prandtl number
irradiation could further reduce the moisture content to
21% dry basis without affecting paddy qualities.
In spite of the successful paddy drying process in Thai
rice mills, a few studies on modelling of paddy drying process has been reported. Poomsa-ad et al. (2002) presented
the simulation of multi-stage paddy drying process, including fluidized bed drying in the first stage, followed by ambient air ventilation or fluidized bed drying in the second
stage and tempering between each stage, but their model
did not include heat transfer equations. Similarly, a modelling of far-infrared drying of grains is rarely reported
although the far-infrared drying is widely applied in the
food processing industry. Ratti and Mujumdar (1995) proposed the modification of heat transfer equations for infrared drying of a single particle, while the mass transfer
equations remained the same as that for purely convective
drying. Fasina, Tyler, and Pickard (1998) developed the
coupled heat and mass transfer models to describe the infrared heating of agricultural crops. Their model assumed that
infrared energy impinged upon the product surface, and
was converted to heat. This assumption contrasted with
RaD
ReD
Rayleigh number
Reynolds number
Greeks
a
dp
b
q
qb
r
e
m
l
thermal diffusivity, m2/s
penetration depth (R R1), mm
volumetric thermal expansion coefficient, 1/K
density, kg/m3
bulk density, kg/m3
Stephan–Boltzman constant, W/m2 K4
emissivity; porosity value, decimal
kinematic viscosity, m2/s
dynamic viscosity, kg/m s
Subscripts
a
drying air
amb
ambient air
e
equilibrium
FC
forced convection
FIR
FIR heater
g
grain
in
initial
NC
natural convection
m
mass, or moisture
r
radiation
s
surface
side
side wall
top
top wall
w
wall
wi
inside wall
wo
outside wall
the published data of Ginzburg (1969), Sandu (1986), and
Nindo, Kudo, and Bekki (1995) who reported that the penetration of infrared radiation into the most grains were just
less than 1–2 mm. The latter assumption is applied in this
study by assuming that infrared energy directly penetrates
into the paddy grain, and heat is generated inside the grain.
The specific objectives of this research were to develop
the coupled heat and mass transfer models of far-infrared
irradiation in multi-stage paddy drying process, and to test
and validate the model predictions on different experimental data.
2. Model development
The predicted paddy drying process, as shown in Fig. 1,
consists in series of fluidized bed drying (FB), far-infrared
Transport
FB
Transport
Transport
FIR
TEM
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of paddy drying process.
AAV
1250
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
irradiation (FIR), tempering (TEM) and ambient air ventilation (AAV), respectively. The transport of paddy from
FB drying to FIR irradiation during the drying process is
considered in this development because the high temperature paddy is pneumatically transported from the inside
of fluidized bed drying chamber to ambient air immediately, and then is carried to FIR irradiation. This transport
has a significant effect on the grain temperature, but the
other transports (i.e. from FIR irradiation to TEM and
from TEM to AAV) have negligible effect.
The general assumptions of this paddy drying model are
as follows:
• Coupled heat and mass transfer models are used to
describe drying process of a single paddy kernel.
• A paddy grain is considered to be an isotropic sphere.
• The shrinkage of the paddy grain during drying process
is negligible.
• The grain characteristics are constant during drying
process.
• Heat and mass transfers within the paddy grain simultaneously take place in the radial direction.
• Temperature and moisture profiles of a paddy at the end
of each stage are used as the initial conditions of the next
stage except for the stage of FB drying has initially the
uniformly distributed moisture and temperature.
• Moisture evaporation takes place at the grain surface of
paddy in each stage, except TEM stage.
The specific assumptions of modelling for each stage in
the paddy drying process are expressed as follows.
2.1. FB drying
In development of the modelling in this stage, heat is
transferred to a paddy grain via forced convection, and
transferred into the interior of a grain via conduction. Nevertheless, moisture is diffused from the interior of a grain to
the surface, and loses into the drying air. Therefore, the
equations of heat and mass transfer are given as follows:
Mass transfer
2
oM
o M 2 oM
¼ Dm
þ
for 0 6 r 6 R
ot
or2
r or
Heat transfer
2
oT
o T 2 oT
¼a
þ
ot
or2 r or
for 0 6 r 6 R
T ¼ T in
at t ¼ 0;
06r6R
06r6R
r¼R
ð6Þ
ð7Þ
ð8Þ
2.2. Transport from FB drying to FIR irradiation
During transporting of paddy, the heat used for moisture evaporation at the surface of grain is derived from
the heat stored inside grain. Both heat and moisture of a
paddy grain lose to the ambient air are assumed by natural
convective transfer. The equations of heat and mass transfer are obtained from Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively. The initial and boundary conditions for this stage are given as
follows:
Initial conditions
M ¼ MðrÞ at t ¼ 0;
T ¼ T ðrÞ at t ¼ 0;
06r6R
06r6R
Boundary conditions
oM
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
dM
D
¼ hm ðM s M e Þ at t > 0; r ¼ R
dr s
oT
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
oT
oM
¼ hNC Ag ðT amb T s Þ þ qg V g hfg
k g Ag
or s
ot
at t > 0;
r¼R
ð9Þ
ð10Þ
ð11Þ
ð12Þ
ð13Þ
ð14Þ
2.3. FIR irradiation
ð2Þ
Initial conditions
at t ¼ 0;
at t > 0;
ð5Þ
ð1Þ
The initial and the boundary conditions are as follows:
M ¼ M in
Boundary conditions
oM
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
dM
D
¼ hm ðM s M e Þ at t > 0; r ¼ R
dr s
oT
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
oT
oM
k g Ag
¼ hFC Ag ðT a T s Þ þ qg V g hfg
or s
ot
ð3Þ
ð4Þ
According to the theory of FIR irradiation (Sandu,
1986), FIR energy from heaters suddenly impinges upon
a grain surface, and directly penetrates into the grain,
approximately 1 mm under the surface (Ginzburg, 1969;
Nindo et al., 1995), as show in Fig. 2. Therefore, all of
FIR Energy is completely absorbed from the grain surface
into the depth of 1 mm, so called the penetrating layer.
This layer is considered the location of the heat-conversion.
The interior of the grain from the depth of 1 mm through
to the grain core is called the conductive layer, which heat
is transferred by conduction. On the contrary, moisture
inside the paddy grain is transferred from the core to the
grain surface. Besides, heat and moisture at the grain
1251
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
FIR Heater
Natural convection
Moisture
Conduction
r=0
Penetrating layer
Conductive layer
R1
R
The second term in the right-hand side of Eq. (16) is FIR
heat generation. This is simply assumed that the spatial distribution of FIR energy absorption is an exponential decay
from the surface into the inside of a spherical grain according to Lambert’s law (Eric Weisstein’s World of Physics,
2005). The FIR heat generation is calculated from the
energy delivered to the paddy grain per unit volume of
the penetrating layer.
As shown in Fig. 4, the mechanism of FIR irradiation in
a box-type FIR dryer is assumed that the quantity of FIR
energy irradiated from the FIR heater is equal to the sum
of the quantity of FIR energy delivered to the paddy grain
and the quantity of energy loss from the inside of radiative
chamber to the environment, so that energy balance for
FIR irradiation is as follows:
qr;FIR ¼ qr;FIRg þ qloss
ð25Þ
Fig. 2. Far-infrared irradiation of a paddy grain in the spherical
geometry.
where qr;FIR ¼ eFIR rAFIR T 4FIR .
The quantity of FIR energy delivered to the paddy grain
is from the FIR heaters directly and the walls of radiative
chamber, which is written as follows:
surface lose into the air within the radiative chamber by
natural convection. The equations of heat and mass transfer are written for each layer as follows:
qr;FIRg ¼
For the penetrating layer
2
oM
o M 2 oM
¼ Dm
þ
for R1 6 r 6 R
ot
or2
r or
2
oT
o T 2 oT
1
Rr
¼a
þ
þ q_ G exp
ot
or2 r or
k
dp
for R1 6 r 6 R
For the conductive layer
2
oM
o M 2 oM
¼ Dm
þ
for 0 6 r < R1
ot
or2
r or
2
oT
o T 2 oT
¼a
þ
for 0 6 r < R1
ot
or2 r or
ð15Þ
ð16Þ
ð17Þ
ð18Þ
Initial conditions
T ¼ T ðrÞ
at t ¼ 0;
at t ¼ 0;
06r6R
06r6R
at t > 0;
r¼R
where the values of eFIR and eg are 0.9 from the manufacturer (Sang Chai Meter Co., Ltd., Thailand, 2004) and 0.7
(Arinze, Schoenau, & Bigsby, 1987), respectively. Moreover, the view factors are obtained from the following relation for the paddy and the cylindrical FIR heater (Obert &
Young, 1962). The values of FFIRg, FFIRw and Fgw are
approximately 0.258, 0.742 and 0.945, respectively.
The quantity of energy loss from the inside of radiative
chamber to the environment includes the losses from the
side surface and the top surface of chamber walls, ignoring
the bottom surface due to a box-type FIR dryer set on a
table, and from the leakage though the vents. The energy
balance for energy loss is written as follows:
1
1
qloss ¼
ð27Þ
þ
ðT a T amb Þ þ qleakage
Rw;side Rw;top
ð19Þ
where
ð20Þ
1
L
1
Rw;side ¼
þ
þ
hwi;side Aw;side k w;side Aw;side hwo;side Aw;side
1
L
1
þ
þ
Rw;top ¼
hwi;top Aw;top k w;top Aw;top hwo;top Aw;top
Boundary conditions
oM
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
dM
D
¼ hm ðM s M e Þ at t > 0; r ¼ R
dr s
oT
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
oT
oM
k g Ag
¼
hNC Ag ðT a T s Þ þ qg V g hfg
or s
ot
1e
1
þ Ag egg
þ 1=ð1=AFIR F FIRg Þþ1=ðð1=A
FIR F FIRw Þþð1=Ag F gw ÞÞ
ð26Þ
The initial and the boundary conditions are as follows:
M ¼ MðrÞ
rðT 4FIR T 4s Þ
1eFIR
AFIR eFIR
ð21Þ
ð22Þ
ð23Þ
Thus, the air temperature inside the radiative chamber can
be calculated from Eq. (27), and the energy leakage is estimated from the energy loss.
2.4. TEM
ð24Þ
In the paddy TEM, the average temperature of paddy
grain is equal to the TEM temperature. The moisture inside
1252
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
a paddy grain is diffused to the grain surface, but the evaporation and the convection of moisture dose not take place
at the grain surface. The heat and mass transfer equations
are obtained from Eqs. (1) and (2) with the new initial and
boundary conditions as follows:
Initial conditions
M ¼ MðrÞ
T ¼ T ðrÞ
at t ¼ 0;
at t ¼ 0;
The convective heat transfer coefficient can be divided
into two modes, namely, natural and forced convection
heat transfer coefficients. These coefficients are obtained
from the following relation (Holman, 1997; Incropera &
DeWitt, 1996):
N uD k a
or hFC ¼
Deq
hNC
06r6R
06r6R
ð28Þ
ð29Þ
For the natural convection heat transfer coefficient
Boundary conditions
oM
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
oM
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ R
or s
oT
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
oT
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ R
or s
1=4
ð30Þ
ð31Þ
ð32Þ
ð33Þ
0:589RaD
9=16 i4=9
1 þ 0:469
Pr
and, the forced convection heat transfer coefficient
!1=4
l
N uD ¼ 2 þ ð0:4Re1=2 þ 0:06Re2=3 ÞPr0:4 a
lg
la cpa
ka
gbðT s T a ÞD3eq
RaD ¼
aa m a
qa va Deq
ReD ¼
la
Pr ¼
The grain temperature, after TEM, is much higher than
the ambient air temperature. This results in the moisture
evaporation on the grain surface during AAV. The heat
and mass transfer equations used in this stage are similar
to the stage of FB drying. The initial and boundary conditions for this stage are as follows:
Initial conditions
T ¼ T ðrÞ
N uD ¼ 2 þ h
at t ¼ 0;
at t ¼ 0;
06r6R
06r6R
ð34Þ
ð35Þ
Boundary conditions
oM
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
dM
D
¼ hm ðM s M e Þ at t > 0; r ¼ R
dr s
oT
¼ 0 at t > 0; r ¼ 0
or
oT
oM
k g Ag
¼
hFC Ag ðT amb T s Þ þ qg V g hfg
or s
ot
r¼R
ð43Þ
ð44Þ
where
2.5. AAV
M ¼ MðrÞ
ð42Þ
ð36Þ
ð37Þ
ð38Þ
at t > 0;
ð39Þ
The convective mass transfer coefficients are obtained
from the heat and mass transfer analogy as follows (Incropera & DeWitt, 1996):
hc
¼ qa cpa Le2=3
ð40Þ
hm
where c = NC: natural convection; FC: forced convection;
r: radiation.
aa
Le ¼
ð41Þ
Dm
ð45Þ
ð46Þ
ð47Þ
Above physical properties of air are obtained from Pakowski, Bartczak, Strumilo, and Stenstrom (1991).
The radiative heat transfer coefficient is calculated from
the following equation:
hr ¼
qr;FIRg
AFIR ðT FIR T s Þ
ð48Þ
where the value of qr,FIRg in Eq. (48) is obtained from Eq.
(26).
The moisture diffusion coefficient for all stages, which is
based on the Arrhenius type equation, are obtained from
the diffusion equation of paddy drying in the wide drying
temperature range as follows (Tirawanichakul, Prachayawarakorn, Varanyanond, & Soponronnarit, 2003):
37099:99
Dm ¼ 2100 exp
ð49Þ
RT abs
Equilibrium moisture content of paddy for each stage
can be calculated from Laithong (1987)
h
i
1 RH ¼ exp 4:723 106 T a ð100M e Þ2:386
ð50Þ
On the other hand, equilibrium moisture content in the
stage of FIR irradiation is estimated to be zero because
the surface burning of paddy grain occurs when paddy is
irradiated to FIR for longer times. This is in line with the
studies of Abe and Afzal (1997) and Fasina et al. (1998).
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Experimental apparatus
Multi-stage paddy drying process developed earlier
(Meeso et al., 2004) was used in this study. It was operated
in series by the devices as follows: a batch-type FB dryer, a
box-type FIR dryer, a tempering glass bottle and an ambient air ventilator, respectively. The batch-type FB dryer
(Fig. 3) comprised a cylindrical drying chamber, a 12-kW
electrical heater, and a centrifugal fan driven by 1.5-kW
motor. A drying temperature was controlled by a PID controller with an accuracy of ±1 C. The box-type FIR dryer
(Fig. 4) comprised a radiative chamber, a ceramic infrared
heater (1.7 cm in diameter, 60 cm in length and 800 W
maximum power), a surface temperature of infrared heater
controlled by ON–OFF controller, an acrylic sample tray
50 · 60 · 1.5 cm in dimensions. The tempering glass bottle
had a diameter and a height of 12 and 10 cm, respectively.
outlet air
recycle air
paddy
inlet
drying chamber
φ 20 cm
paddy
outlet
inlet
air
1253
The last device, the ambient air ventilator, comprised a
cylindrical ventilation chamber, a centrifugal fan, and a
sample tray made of wire mesh (20 cm in diameter and
3 cm in height).
The temperatures of paddy grain, drying air and ambient air were measured by K-type thermocouples connected
to a data logger (accuracy of ±1 C). Besides, air velocity
was measured by hot-wire anemometer (accuracy of
±0.1 m/s).
3.2. Experimental procedure
Fresh Supanburi 1 paddy with high moisture content
(25.0–29.0% d.b.) was harvested from Pathumtani Rice
Research Center. They were then rewetted to about 30.0–
33.0% d.b. and kept in a cooling room at 3–5 C for 7 days.
Paddy was allowed to stabilize at ambient air temperature
before the drying experiments.
The drying experiments were divided into three conditions as shown in Table 1. In operating the drying process,
paddy was dried by a FB dryer at 150 C for 1–2 min.
Then, it was transported from a FB dryer into the sample
tray as a single-grain layer and irradiated by a FIR dryer at
intensities of 0.30 and 0.70 W/cm2 for 0.5–1 min. After
that, it was put into a glass bottle, which was closed completely and kept in a hot-air oven at temperature equal to
the grain temperature after FIR irradiation for 20 min.
Lastly, it was transported into ambient air ventilator and
was ventilated by ambient air with velocity of 0.15 m/s
for 30 min.
During operation, paddy samples were taken after each
stage of the drying process for measuring moisture content.
The moisture contents of paddy were determined by drying
triplicate samples in a hot-air oven at 103 C for 72 h
(AACC, 1995), and were calculated on dry basis (d.b.).
distributor
3.3. Solution methodology
fan
heater
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of a batch-type FB dryer.
Air vents
Sample tray
30 cm
15 cm
FIR heater 800 W and reflector
To solve these heat and mass transfer equations, the
simple explicit method of finite-difference scheme was
applied to discrete all heat and mass transfer equations
with boundary conditions in the spherical symmetry (Ozisik, 1990). Then, the sets of equation were written in computer program. The average moisture contents and
temperatures for a paddy grain were calculated with
Simpson’s rule (Chapra & Canale, 1990)
MðtÞ ¼
T ðtÞ ¼
60 cm
80 cm
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of a box-type FIR dryer.
4p
Vg
Z
4p
Vg
Z
R
r2 Mðr; tÞdr
ð51Þ
r2 T ðr; tÞdr
ð52Þ
0
R
0
The thermo-physical properties of a paddy grain used in
the model were as follows (Brooker, Bakker-Arkema, &
Hall, 1992; Laithong, 1987):
1254
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
Table 1
The experimental conditions of the paddy drying process
The drying process
The conditional numbers
A
B
C
D
150
9.5
2.6
1
150
9.5
2.6
1
150
9.5
2.6
1.5
150
9.5
2.6
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.310
*
15
1
0.700
*
15
1
0.310
*
15
0.5
0.700
*
15
0.5
Time (min)
20
20
20
20
Bed thickness (cm)a
Air velocity (m/s)a
Time (min)
3
0.15
30
3
0.15
30
3
0.15
30
3
0.15
30
FB
Air temp. (C)a
Bed thickness (cm)a
Air velocity (m/s)a
Time (min)
Transport
Time (min)
FIR
Average radiative intensity (W/cm2)
Bed thickness
Distance between heater-paddy (cm)b
Time (min)
TEM
AAV
*
a
b
A single layer of grain.
Recommended by Poomsa-ad et al. (2001).
Recommended by Afzal, Abe, and Hikida (1999).
cg ¼ 1110 þ 44:8M w ; k g ¼ 0:0863 þ 0:00134M w ; qg ¼ qb =ð1 eÞ;
qb ¼ 552 þ 282M;
e ¼ 0:623 0:25M; R ¼ 1:75 103 m; R1 ¼ 0:75 103 m
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Moisture distribution of a paddy grain
The comparison of predicted and experimental average
moisture contents of paddy during drying processes shown
in Figs. 5–8 exhibited the change of average moisture content with processing time. Figs. 5 and 6 showed the predicted and experimental average moisture contents during
Fig. 6. Comparison of predicted and experimental average moisture
contents of paddy at condition B: FB (150 C, 1 min), transport (0.5 min),
FIR (0.7 W/cm2, 1 min), TEM (20 min) and AAV (30 min, ambient air
condition: 30 C, 70% RH).
Fig. 5. Comparison of predicted and experimental average moisture
contents of paddy at condition A: FB (150 C, 1 min), transport (0.5 min),
FIR (0.310 W/cm2, 1 min), TEM (20 min) and AAV (30 min, ambient air
condition: 30 C, 70% RH).
the drying conditions A and B. Both drying conditions
were similar except for FIR intensity was different (Table
1). It can be seen from FIR irradiation stage that FIR
intensity helped the removing of moisture in a paddy grain,
which still had high moisture content after FB drying and
transport of paddy, approximately above 24.0% d.b. This
result indicated that the average moisture content of paddy
was significantly reduced with an increase in FIR intensity.
However, it resembled that FIR intensity slightly affected
on moisture reduction after FB drying and transport of
paddy if moisture content was lower than about 24% d.b.
even at applying high FIR intensity as shown in Figs. 7
and 8 because when a paddy grain enriched with water,
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
1255
gave a higher rate of moisture reduction during the onset
of AAV stage. However, the TEM time in this study was
20 min in order to reduce the time of the experiments.
Figs. 5–8 indicated a good agreement between the predicted and experimental average moisture contents of
paddy during the drying processes. The maximum difference in moisture content was less than 2.5% d.b. at the
end of FB drying stage.
To understand the moisture distribution inside a paddy
grain, the predicted moisture inside a paddy grain of the
drying condition B were presented in two figures, i.e.
Fig. 9 presented during the stage of FB drying to FIR irradiation, and Fig. 10 presented for overall stages. It could be
seen that the moisture content, at the superficial layer
Fig. 7. Comparison of predicted and experimental average moisture
contents of paddy at condition C: FB (150 C, 1.5 min), Transport
(0.5 min), FIR (0.310 W/cm2, 0.5 min), TEM (20 min) and AAV (30 min,
ambient air condition: 30 C, 70% RH).
Fig. 9. Predicted moisture profiles inside a paddy grain of drying
condition B during fluidized bed drying stage to FIR irradiation stage.
Fig. 8. Comparison of predicted and experimental average moisture
contents of paddy at condition D: FB (150 C, 1.5 min), transport
(0.5 min), FIR (0.7 W/cm2, 0.5 min), TEM (20 min) and AAV (30 min,
ambient air condition: 30 C, 70% RH).
FIR energy was mainly absorbed by water molecules inside
the grain rather than organic compounds (i.e. proteins and
starches).
In exposure to AAV after TEM stage, it was noted that
the average moisture contents progressively dropped in the
first 5 min, and further reduced gradually during the rest of
ventilation stage as shown in Figs. 5–8. In fact, if the TEM
time was 35 min, according to the recommendation of
Poomsa-ad et al. (2002), the curve of moisture content in
the first 5 min of AAV stage was sharply less than these
moisture curves in this study, because a longer TEM time
Fig. 10. Predicted moisture profiles inside a paddy grain of drying
condition B during overall stages.
1256
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
under the grain surface, fast approached the equilibrium
moisture content (approximately below 5% d.b.) during
the stage of FB drying (lines 2 and 3 in Fig. 9). This was
mainly because of high mass transfer between the air and
the grain due to high air velocity (2.6 m/s). Thereafter,
the moisture changes in the deeper layer of a paddy grain
were slow during the stages of paddy transport and FIR
irradiation (lines 4–6 in Fig. 9), respectively. Tempering
paddy for longer than 35 min caused moisture gradient
(line 8 in Fig. 10) equalize between the center and surface
of the paddy grain.
4.2. Temperature distribution of a paddy grain
Figs. 11–14 showed the comparison of predicted and
experimental grain temperatures of paddy during drying
processes. In order to clarify the effect of FIR intensity,
the grain temperature in FIR irradiation stage of conditions A and B were examined for two levels of the FIR
intensities of 0.310 and 0.700 W/cm2 as shown in Figs. 11
and 12, respectively. It was evident that the grain temperatures were considerably increased with higher FIR intensity. A similar trend was also observed when the average
moisture content after FB drying and transport lower than
Fig. 11. Comparison of predicted and experimental grain temperatures of
paddy at condition A: FB (150 C, 1 min), transport (0.5 min), FIR
(0.310 W/cm2, 1 min), TEM (20 min) and AAV (30 min, ambient air
condition: 30 C, 70% RH).
Fig. 13. Comparison of predicted and experimental grain temperatures of
paddy at condition C: FB (150 C, 1.5 min), transport (0.5 min), FIR
(0.310 W/cm2, 0.5 min), TEM (20 min) and AAV (30 min, ambient air
condition: 30 C, 70% RH).
Fig. 12. Comparison of predicted and experimental grain temperatures of
paddy at condition B: FB (150 C, 1 min), transport (0.5 min), FIR
(0.7 W/cm2, 1 min), TEM (20 min) and AAV (30 min, ambient air
condition: 30 C, 70% RH).
Fig. 14. Comparison of predicted and experimental grain temperatures of
paddy at condition D: FB (150 C, 1.5 min), transport (0.5 min), FIR
(0.7 W/cm2, 0.5 min), TEM (20 min) and AAV (30 min, ambient air
condition: 30 C, 70% RH).
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
24% d.b. as shown in Figs. 13 and 14 accordance with conditions C and D, respectively, but the temperature difference between both conditions (C and D) was less than
that of A and B’s conditions. This result was due to less
water molecules to absorb FIR energy in conditions C
and D. The grain temperature after TEM stage suddenly
dropped to ambient air temperature (approximately
30 C), and was maintained throughout the AAV period.
From Figs. 11–14, it can be seen that the predicted grain
temperatures was in good agreement with the experimental
grain temperatures during paddy drying processes. The
maximum difference in the grain temperatures between
the predictions and the experiments did not exceed 5 C
at the first 5 min of AAV stage.
Figs. 15 and 16 showed the predicted temperature
profiles inside a paddy grain in drying condition B during
1257
FB drying stage to FIR irradiation stage and overall
stages, respectively. After the changes in grain temperature profile during FB drying and transport of paddy
(lines 2–4 in Fig. 15), it can be seen that when exposure
to FIR irradiation resulted in an immediate increase in
grain temperature within the penetrating layer (line 5 in
Fig. 15) until temperature gradient inside a paddy grain
almost approached to zero (line 6 in Fig. 15). This phenomenon was because FIR energy directly penetrates into
a paddy grain, and induces the mechanism of changes in
molecular vibration state, resulting in heating within the
penetrating layer of a paddy grain. The grain temperature
profile was maintained during the TEM stage (line 7 in
Fig. 16), and then it was immediately reduced close to
ambient air temperature during AAV stage (lines 8–11
in Fig. 16).
Fig. 15. Predicted temperature profiles inside a paddy grain of drying condition B during fluidized bed drying stage to FIR irradiation stage.
Fig. 16. Predicted temperature profiles inside a paddy grain of drying condition B during overall stages.
1258
N. Meeso et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2007) 1248–1258
5. Conclusions
Simultaneous heat and mass transfer equations were
solved using the finite-difference scheme to predict the
changes in paddy moisture content and temperature in a
series drying process, comprising fluidized bed drying,
transport of paddy, far-infrared irradiation, tempering
and ambient air ventilation. The predicted results agreed
well with the experimental data. The maximum difference
was 2.5% d.b. for average moisture content at the end of
fluidized bed drying and 5 C for the grain temperature
at the first 5 min of ambient air ventilation. The model
indicated that far-infrared irradiation was more effective
in moisture reduction of wet paddy than dry paddy, and
temperature inside a paddy grain within the penetrating
layer was also increased with FIR intensity level.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Thailand Research
Fund (TRF) for financial support and Department of
Microbiology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology
Thonburi for providing a far-infrared dryer.
References
AACC (1995). Approved method of the American of cereal chemists (9th
ed.). MN: St. Paul.
Abe, T., & Afzal, T. M. (1997). Thin-layer infrared radiation drying of
rough rice. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 67, 289–297.
Afzal, T. M., Abe, T., & Hikida, Y. (1999). Energy and quality aspects
during combined FIR-convection drying of barley. Journal of Food
Engineering, 42, 177–182.
Arinze, E. A., Schoenau, G. J., & Bigsby, F. W. (1987). Determination of
solar energy absorption and thermal radiation properties of some
agricultural products. Transactions of the ASAE, 30(1), 259–265.
Brooker, D. B., Bakker-Arkema, F. W., & Hall, C. W. (1992). Drying and
storage of grains and oilseeds. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
Press, 450 pp.
Chapra, S. C., & Canale, R. P. (1990). Numerical methods for engineers.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 812 pp.
Eric Weisstein’s World of Physics (2005). Lambert’s law. Available from
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/LambertsLaw.html.
Fasina, O. O., Tyler, R. T., & Pickard, M. D. (1998). Modelling the
infrared radiative heating of agriculture crops. Drying Technology—An
International Journal, 16(9–10), 2065–2082.
Ginzburg, A. S. (1969). Application of infrared radiation in food processing,
Chemical and process engineering series. London: Leonard Hill.
Holman, J. P. (1997). Heat transfer (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill,
696 pp.
Incropera, F. P., & DeWitt, D. P. (1996). Fundamental of heat and mass
transfer. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 802 pp.
Laithong C. (1987). Study of thermo-physical properties of rough rice.
Master Thesis. King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Bangkok,
Thailand.
Meeso, N., Nathakaranakule, A., Madhiyanon, T., & Soponronnarit, S.
(2004). Influence of FIR irradiation on paddy moisture reduction and
milling quality after fluidized bed drying. Journal of Food Engineering,
65, 293–301.
Meeso, N., Soponronnarit, S., & Wetchacama, S. (1999). Evaluation of
drying system performance in rice mills. In Proceedings of the 19th
ASEAN/1st APEC seminar on postharvest technology (pp. 286–295),
Hochi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nindo, C. I., Kudo, Y., & Bekki, E. (1995). Test model for studying sun
drying of rough rice using far-infrared radiation. Drying Technology—
An International Journal, 13(1–2), 225–238.
Obert, E. F., & Young, R. L. (1962). Elements of thermodynamics and heat
transfer (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 538 pp.
Ozisik, M. N. (1990). Finite difference methods in heat transfer. CRC Press,
412 pp.
Pakowski, Z., Bartczak, Z., Strumilo, C., & Stenstrom, S. (1991).
Evaluation of equations approximating thermodynamic and transport
properties of water, steam and air for use in CAD of drying processes.
Drying Technology—An International Journal, 9(3), 753–773.
Poomsa-ad, N., Soponronnarit, S., Prachayawarakron, S., & Terdyothin,
A. (2002). Effect of tempering on subsequent drying of paddy using
fluidization technique. Drying Technology—An International Journal,
20(1–2), 195–210.
Poomsa-ad, N., Soponronnarit, S., Terdyothin, A., & Prachayawarakron,
S. (2001). Head rice yield after fluidization technique and tempering. In
Proceedings of ADC’01 (pp. 717–726), Penang, Malaysia.
Ratti, C., & Mujumdar, A. S. (1995). Infrared drying. In A. S. Mujumdar
(Vol. Eds.), Handbook of industrial drying (Vol. 1, pp. 567–588). New
York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 742 pp.
Sandu, C. (1986). Infrared radiative drying in food engineering: a process
analysis. Biotechnology Progress, 2, 109–119.
Sakai, N., & Hanzawa, T. (1994). Applications and advances in farinfrared heating in Japan. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 5,
357–362.
Sang Chai Meter Co., Ltd., Thailand (2004). Infrared ceramic heater.
Available from http://www.sangchaimeter.com.
Soponronnarit, S. (1995). Strategy for managing moist paddy. The Royal
Institute Journal, 20(4), 115–125.
Soponronnarit, S., Wetchacama, S., Swasdisevi, T., & Poomsa-ad, N.
(1999). Managing moist by drying tempering and ambient air
ventilation. Drying Technology—An International Journal, 17(1–2),
335–344.
Tirawanichakul, S., Prachayawarakorn, S., Varanyanond, W., & Soponronnarit, S. (2003). Diffusion model of a wide drying temperature
range for fluidized bed paddy drying. In Proceedings of ADC’03 (pp.
657–666), Bangkok, Thailand.