Academia.eduAcademia.edu

"American Tropical (review)"

2005, Americas

In 1969 art historian Shifra Goldman initiated a campaign to restore América Tropical, a public mural painted by Mexican artist David Alfaro Siqueiros in 1932 on a second-story, outside wall of Old Italian Hall in Los Angeles' historic Olvera Street. Jesus Treviño's 30-minute film is an artifact of that early initiative. Equal parts historical documentary, political activism, and promotional campaign, the video situates Siqueiros' most important U.S. mural within the cultural nationalism of the Chicano civil rights movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s.

BOOK REVIEWS 559 undergraduate courses on music and popular culture, especially when used in conjunction with additional readings to help frame questions about the politics of popular music in Latin American society. Franklin & Marshall College Lancaster, Pennsylvania ERIC ZOLOV América Tropical. Directed by Jesus Treviño. New York: The Cinema Guild, 1971. Non-theatrical release: 2003. 30 mins. Color VHS. $99.95. In 1969 art historian Shifra Goldman initiated a campaign to restore América Tropical, a public mural painted by Mexican artist David Alfaro Siqueiros in 1932 on a second-story, outside wall of Old Italian Hall in Los Angeles’ historic Olvera Street. Jesus Treviño’s 30-minute film is an artifact of that early initiative. Equal parts historical documentary, political activism, and promotional campaign, the video situates Siqueiros’ most important U.S. mural within the cultural nationalism of the Chicano civil rights movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s. The story of the mural, while familiar to Angelinos, has been overshadowed by the more spectacular censorship of Diego Rivera’s 1933 Rockefeller Center mural in New York. Nonetheless, Siqueiros’ influence is arguably more significant among Chicano artists in California, with the Olvera Street project as his greatest legacy. After executing a controversial fresco at the Chouinard Art School, Siqueiros was propositioned by F. K. Ferenz, director of the Plaza Art Center, to paint an 18’ ⫻ 80’ mural on the theme of “Tropical America.” Recognizing an unprecedented opportunity to paint in a truly public place with an audience of Anglo tourists and Mexican American residents, Siqueiros seized the occasion to condemn racism—particularly the exploitation of migrant labor—and U.S. imperialism in Latin America (something Rivera did only obliquely in his U.S. frescos). Turning Ferenz’ theme on its head, Siqueiros painted an Indian crucified amidst crumbling ruins in a dense tropical jungle. Nearby, an Andean warrior and Mexican revolutionary crouch with their weapons aimed at an American eagle, symbol of economic imperialism, surmounting the cross. The mural provoked immediate controversy, and two years later it was whitewashed and left to deteriorate in the blistering sun, rain, and smog of Southern California. Through visual montage and voice-over narration Treviño’s film tells the story of the commission, execution, and censorship of Siqueiros’ mural, including an assessment by two Mexican conservators of the mural’s condition in 1971. The film surveys this history in a swift and compelling fashion through interviews with participants/witnesses and Siqueiros himself, who discusses his intentions and solidarity with the struggle of his compañeros on the other side of the border. Treviño also places the mural within a broader context, juxtaposing the agricultural and industrial workers strikes of the 1930s with the Chicano Moratorium, and comparing the “accidental” shooting of Mexican president Pascual Ortiz Rubio’s nephew by an Oklahoma sheriff in 1931 with the death of Rubén Salazar at the hands of Los Angeles police in 1970. The civil rights frame effectively draws parallels between the 560 BOOK REVIEWS inter-war and post-war periods, enabling discussions about not only the politics of public art, but also the role of culture in the process of “becoming Mexican American” that George Sánchez has described. Ultimately, the significance of the mural and the decades-long struggle to preserve it exceeds the scope of art history and opens onto current debates about the spatial politics of Los Angeles and the role of street-level interventions by Latin American immigrants and Chicano/as to reshape the urban geography of one of the most vicious built environments in the nation. As Mexican conservator Jaime Mejía argues in the film, the point of the conservation effort is not to reconstruct the mural but rather to preserve it as historical fact. Mejía’s remark concerns the problems confronting restoration as a result of the artist’s experimental techniques and the extensive damage incurred over years of neglect. However, contemporary conversations might build on Mejía’s insight to address the role of preservation in public memory or the tactical ethos of what Raúl Villa calls “barriology.” That is, the goal of conserving a Mexican mural from 1932 is not to restore the image to a pristine state of origin, but rather to maintain it as a physical document—a “living link” in the words of Goldman—that continues to serve as a point of articulation for material struggles over cultural citizenship and social visibility for Los Angeles’ Chicano population to this day. Dartmouth College Hanover, New Hampshire MARY K. COFFEY On the Case of Rosalie Evans. Directed by John Mraz. Puebla: Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 2004. 60 mins. VHS. No price. During the chaotic era that afflicted post-revolutionary Mexico, conditions in Puebla were particularly difficult. Hacienda owners and peasants continued to jostle for possession of land, rule by rifle trumped rule of law, and the state was led by what Ernest Gruening termed “a succession of atrocious governors—murderers, thieves, or drunkards.” Amid this confusion, a widowed American fought desperately to hold on to her property: arming herself, cajoling employees, defying agraristas, and browbeating representatives of three governments—U.S. consuls, British diplomats, even President Álvaro Obregón—into focusing on her plight. The stubborn valor of Rosalie Evans drew admiration and contempt; ultimately, it drew a volley of assassins’ bullets. John Mraz has assembled a penetrating film about the Evans affair. Eschewing the narrative conventions of documentary, Mraz introduces his subject only briefly; he devotes most of his time to a round-table discussion that examines a succession of pertinent themes: agrarian reform, class conflict, gender dynamics, international relations, and politics at various levels. In addition to Mraz, who acts as moderator, there are three Puebla-based academics—David LaFrance, Rogelio Sánchez López and Roberto Vélez Pliego—along with Timothy Henderson, author of the extraordinarily rich biography of Rosalie Evans, The Worm in the Wheat (1998).