132
Notes, September 2013
issue. As way of a final comment, the musical examples are superbly typeset.
Edward Jurkowski
University of Lethbridge
The American Stravinsky: The Style
and Aesthetics of Copland’s New
American Music, the Early Works,
1921–1938. By Gayle Murchison. Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Press,
2012.
[xviii,
285
p.
ISBN
9780472099849. $80.] Music examples,
illustrations, bibliography, index.
Widely regarded as the quintessential
composer of American music, Aaron
Copland played a crucial role in the development of twentieth-century art music.
From his early experimentation with jazz
idioms to the incorporation of folk tunes
in his later compositions, the Dean of
American Composers was dedicated to
creating music with a distinctly “American”
sound. Scholars often debate the source of
inspiration for this artistic vision and how
Copland achieved his compositional style,
with each argument contributing to a
richer understanding of the composer’s
works. Taking this important discussion
one step further, Gayle Murchison, in her
The American Stravinsky: The Style and
Aesthetics of Copland’s New American Music,
the Early Works, 1921–1938, delves into
Copland’s compositions, arguing convincingly that Copland did not simply see himself as an American composer, but rather a
modern American composer. Offering a detailed investigation of Copland’s life and
careful analysis of his early musical compositions, Murchison reveals the distinctly
modernist tendencies permeating his
works. Indeed, throughout her thorough
study, she successfully challenges the standard convention of dividing Copland’s career into stylistic periods. Instead, she
demonstrates how Copland maintained
consistent compositional techniques
throughout his career, shifting only the
“foreground elements of his music or the
source of his borrowed melodies and
rhythms” (p. 234). This crucial discovery
within Copland scholarship reveals a compositional consistency underlying Copland’s oeuvre that had not yet been clearly
addressed.
Targeting a musically literate audience,
Murchison, in an eloquent, well-executed,
and accessible manner, reveals Copland’s
adaptation of modern European compositional techniques, and explains how he
made them his own. Murchison’s strong
musical analysis and accompanying score
excerpts are a particular highlight of this
study. She offers a fresh understanding of
Copland’s groundbreaking works through
the lens of modern European influence,
while providing a language with which to
discuss Copland’s complexity. Moreover,
she builds upon the seminal studies that
came before her; by combining the sociohistorical context of Copland’s life with
detailed musical analysis of his modern
compositional techniques, she ultimately
reveals Copland’s lifelong commitment to
creating modern American music.
The text proceeds chronologically, further contributing to Murchison’s argument, for one may easily observe the same
modernist elements pervading Copland’s
compositions throughout the decades.
Introducing Copland’s early fascination
with European modernism in chapter 1,
“Scherzo humoristique (Cat and Mouse),”
Murchison explains Copland’s early adoption of these ideals while in secondary
school, which he learned by attending live
performances, listening to contemporary
recordings, and independent score study.
She notes that “before he had even graduated high school, Copland had been exposed to the music of the leading European modernists, ranging from Debussy to
Stravinsky” (p. 12). Highlighting this influence on Copland’s early compositions, she
provides a detailed analysis of Scherzo humoristique (Cat and Mouse), highlighting
Copland’s early exploration of an ultramodern style. She first illuminates
Debussy’s influence on Copland’s use of
pentatonic and whole tone scales before arguing convincingly for Stravinsky’s role as
“the composer after whose music Copland
modeled his own” (p. 29). Citing octatonicism, black and white key division, the importance of the tritone, and the use of VII-I
harmonic progressions, her analysis clearly
attributes Stravinsky’s Petrushka as the inspiration for Copland’s early modernist work.
Indeed, it is during this early stage that
Copland began developing the modernist
style that remained consistent throughout
his career.
Book Reviews
Paris marked the next step in Copland’s
compositional development, and, as
Murchison explains in chapter 2,
“Boulanger and Compositional Maturity,” it
is here that he grew from an eager young
student to a mature composer. With
Boulanger’s emphasis on technique, her
concept of la grande ligne, and her fostering
of Copland’s interest in Stravinsky, Copland’s well-renowned teacher left a lasting
impression on his compositional career,
which Murchison illustrates through analyses of Copland’s Symphony for Organ and
Orchestra and the second movement,
Rondino, of the Two Pieces for String
Quartet. Noting the latter as a form of collage, Murchison identifies not only evidence of Boulanger’s la grande ligne, but
also of Stravinsky’s interlocking polyrhythmic ostinatos and of various rhythmic and
harmonic jazz elements, explaining that
Copland “juxtaposes the old and the new,
recycling classical form, canon, Renaissance techniques, and contrapuntal texture
of the past with the contemporary techniques of Stravinskian modernism” (p. 47).
Such clear, compelling analyses throughout
chapter 2 simultaneously offer a fresh approach to understanding the complexities
of Copland’s early works while creating a
basis to consider his later compositions.
Focusing largely on Copland’s exploration of jazz in chapters 3 and 4,
Murchison discusses the composer’s use of
the idiom both prior to and throughout his
time in Paris. She first highlights Copland’s
original conception of jazz as a primarily
rhythmic phenomenon that uniquely combines polyrhythms and cross-rhythms,
which she demonstrates in her analysis of
Copland’s Three Moods (also known as Trois
esquisses). This understanding of Copland’s
jazz background prepares one for chapter
4, in which Copland, inspired by the
French neoclassicists, fully embraces jazz
as “a style that was both modern and American” (p. 82). Importantly, Murchison reveals that Copland saw jazz as only one element of a composition, believing that one
must incorporate these innovative rhythms
with other modern aesthetics in order to
create a successful work. Revealing Copland’s theory in practice, she follows with
analyses of Grohg and Dance Symphony, highlighting the composer’s combination of
jazz rhythms, Boulanger’s counterpoint,
Stravinsky’s polyrhythms and shifting metri-
133
cal accents, and Les Six’s neoclassicism,
concluding, “Copland realized that a synthesis of modernist harmonic, tonal, and
melodic techniques and jazz-derived and
jazz-influenced rhythms could be the style
and substance of a technically mature,
modern, urban American art music that
equaled that of Europe” (p. 94). Indeed,
throughout chapters 3 and 4, Murchison
builds a strong, convincing argument regarding the critical role of jazz in Copland’s compositions, revealing that Copland did not abandon the idiom upon his
movement to a more accessible style, but
rather adapted the rhythmic elements to fit
within his changing aesthetics.
Copland’s return to the United States
in 1924 marked the beginning of his
American career, and chapters 5 and 6 investigate his compositional style of the
mid-to-late 1920s. Chapter 5, “Back in the
United States: Popular Music, Jazz and
the New American Music,” investigates
Copland’s overt use of jazz idioms in his
early large-scale works. Providing a layered
investigation of Copland’s Music for the
Theatre—a particularly noteworthy and
comprehensive analysis—Murchison reveals not only Copland’s direct borrowing
of jazz idioms, including melody, orchestration, and rhythm, but also his continued
modernist influences from Stravinsky and
French neoclassicism. Further, she presents
the composition as “a portrait of Copland’s
. . . race, ethnicity and sexuality” (p. 113).
This connection to Copland’s life proves
highly convincing, as Murchison builds
upon the studies of Julia Smith and
Howard Pollack, while investigating Copland’s personal connection to the tune The
Sidewalks of New York, which he incorporates
within the composition. ( Julia Smith,
Aaron Copland: His Works and Contributions
to American Music [New York: E. P. Sutton,
1955]; Howard Pollack, Aaron Copland: The
Life and Work of an Uncommon Man.
[Urbana: University of Illinois Press,
1999]). By combining both technical and
historical analytic approaches, Murchison’s
multi-level investigation of Music for the
Theatre offers a sound, detailed explanation
of Copland’s five-movement work.
While studying in Paris, Copland spent
the summers of 1922 and 1923 visiting different music meccas in Eastern Europe,
learning the various compositional techniques of composers including Bartók,
134
Schoenberg, Webern, and Hába. Not surprisingly, Copland learned much from his
travels, which Murchison discusses in chapter 6, “European Influence beyond Stravinsky and Les Six: Hába and Schoenberg.”
She investigates Copland’s incorporation of
Eastern European influences with his
Jewish heritage in his composition Vitebsk,
arguing that his inspiration did not necessarily come from an expression of faith, but
rather as an imitation of these modernist
composers who similarly integrated folk
songs into their compositions. Indeed,
Vitebsk is Copland’s only explicitly “Jewish”
work, and his borrowing of folk tunes,
Murchison explains, “was like working with
jazz, and later, cowboy songs and AngloAmerican ballads and hymns . . . the
world’s folk music traditions were his musical oysters” (p. 147). By understanding
Copland’s use of Jewish folk tunes as a
medium to explore modernist techniques,
one further appreciates the composer’s
commitment to creating a modern American sound.
Chapters 7 through 10 reveal Copland’s
move toward an accessible musical style influenced largely by the Great Depression,
leftist politics, and fellow politically active
artists. Murchison stresses that despite
Copland’s shift to composing for a wider
audience, he nevertheless maintained the
modern musical techniques of Stravinsky,
Milhaud, and Debussy, only presented in a
simplified form. In chapter 7, “Toward a
New National Music during the 1930s:
Copland’s Populism, Accessible Style and
Folk and Popular Music,” Murchison notes
a shift in Copland’s audience; his ultramodern sounds of the 1920s were rendered
too demanding for the listeners of the
1930s. Finding inspiration in Hindemith’s
Gebrauchsmusik, Copland responded to
this change by composing works for the
amateur musician, as seen in the choral
work What Do We Plant? and the piano
pieces “Sunday Afternoon Music” and “The
Young Pioneers.”
Chapter 8, “Copland’s Journey Left,”
provides a necessary look into Copland’s
involvement with the leftist ideals of the
1930s. Labeling Copland a “fellow traveller” in leftist politics, Murchison explains
how his newly accessible music aligned
closely with the Left’s social function for
music. Through a compelling analysis of
Notes, September 2013
“Into the Streets May First,” Copland’s
workers song for The Composers’ Collective, Murchison explains how Copland
combined “simplicity of melody with a
mildly adventurous modulation” resulting
in an accessible modern mass song
(p. 180). As the 1930s progressed, however,
the Left grew interested in American folk
music due to its accessibility to the working
man. As Murchison explains, Copland too
began using such “folk music to create his
version of populist music that sprouted
from the aesthetic ideology shaped by his
engagement with the cultural politics of
the Popular Front” (p. 189). Indeed, while
involved with The Composers’ Collective,
Copland quickly discovered the value of
American folk tunes in creating an accessible art music, a concept that he maintained
for much of his remaining compositional
career.
Closely investigating Copland’s use of
folk tunes in both El Salón México and Billy
the Kid (chaps. 9 and 10, respectively),
Murchison reveals how Copland largely
adapted his earlier compositional techniques such as ostinatos, pedals, polyrhythmic complexities, and bitonality into
a more accessible idiom, while simultaneously pulling from Stravinsky’s use of
segmented folk tunes. This approach,
Murchison argues, results in a sort of “deception,” for while the folk melodies suggest simplicity, the underlying structural
ideas remain highly sophisticated. Within
her analysis of El Salón México in chapter 9,
“ ‘Folk’ Music and the Popular Front,”
Murchison reveals a further connection between the composition and leftist politics,
as “Mexican society was seen as harmonious, in contrast to life in the modern
United States” (p. 193). With the onset of
World War II, however, many artists shifted
their concentration to the war effort, and
as Murchison makes clear in her analysis of
Billy the Kid, Copland similarly moved away
from the strong political left. Within her
analysis Murchison identifies several important connections between these two folkinspired compositions, through Copland’s
combination of modernist aesthetics with
traditional folk tunes. Indeed, with “Billy the
Kid Copland had now moved beyond appropriating folk songs of another culture to
appropriating that of his own America,” all
within an accessible modern style (p. 229).
Book Reviews
Occasionally one may find the analysis of
Copland’s sociocultural background repetitive within Murchison’s text, as many of the
ideas (for example nationalism and the desire to create an American music) permeate much of Copland’s career. This is not
necessarily a fault, however, as it reinforces
the importance of Copland’s cultural surroundings to his compositional approach.
The only drawback of The American
Stravinsky is that Murchison stops at 1938;
her new take on Copland studies is both
compelling and successful, and one eagerly
awaits her analysis of Copland’s later musical works as well.
From interlocking polyrhythms and
bitonal poles to New Left ideals and Copland’s homosexuality, Murchison’s thorough analysis of Aaron Copland’s early life
and works offers a new perspective on this
“Composer from Brooklyn.” Ultimately providing a fresh approach to understanding
Copland’s music, Murchison offers a timely
study that opens many doors for further investigation of Copland’s compositions.
Paula Musegades
Brandeis University
Henry Cowell: A Man Made of Music.
By Joel Sachs. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. [xvii, 600 p. ISBN
9780195108958. $45.] Illustrations,
bibliography, index.
Joel Sachs’s long-awaited book on one of
America’s most notable musical mavericks
offers a rich discourse not only on the life
of Henry Cowell (1897–1965), but also a
commentary on the many prolific figures
close to him. As such, it charts a history of
American music in the early twentieth century and reflects on several interconnected
areas of musical life, including the publication and reception of new music, advances
in ethnomusicology, the community of
composers, and the reach of American music beyond its geographical borders.
That this book was long in coming can
hardly be any surprise, as it becomes
clear from the outset that Sachs was faced
with an extraordinary array of resources
from figures who were exceptionally wellintentioned but not always fully acquainted
with specific details, among them Cowell
himself. However, through extensive cross-
135
referencing, Sachs has developed a cogent
narrative that is brimming with new factual
details, written across sixty-one chapters,
and enveloped in six parts.
Of the many figures, familial, social, and
collegial, with whom Cowell interacts, his
relationships with three women come to
the fore: Clara/Clarissa Dixon Cowell (his
mother), Olive Thompson Cowell (his second stepmother), and Sidney Robertson
Cowell (his wife) (p. 3). Sidney Cowell was
alive until shortly before the book’s publication and much of the material is crossreferenced through her notes. However,
she too could also be a fruitful source of
both reliable information and misremembered and embroidered memory.
Although it would be tempting to consider everything about Cowell’s personal
life in tandem with his relationship with
his mother, Sachs presents the information
on both his home schooling, his mother’s
attitudes to relationships and religion—
including standing in church at seventeen
and renouncing her membership (p. 12)—
in such a fashion that readers will draw
their own conclusions. One can see obvious
resemblances to his mother, such as a
tremendous independence of spirit that
manifested itself in Cowell’s being significantly self-taught, reading “Stainer on harmony, Mason on orchestration, and Prout
on musical form” (p. 33) at a young age.
Clarissa’s tenacity in her own career is a
further point of reference as she scraped
by to make ends meet as a writer. While
Cowell was a teenager, she became ill and
he became the sole provider, working as an
assistant janitor for a school and cleaning
out a neighbor’s chicken house (p. 35).
However, in 1910 Cowell’s horizons were
broadened through his work with the
Stanford professor Lewis M. Terman, who
began to meet with him three times a week
to conduct intelligence tests (p. 37).
Terman later noted that what impressed
him most was Cowell’s intellectual versatility (p. 43). Through Stanford connections
the young Cowell developed a coterie of
supporters that increased in number
throughout his life, including the English
professor Samuel S. Seward, who helped
organize a fund that would allow him to
be free of the financial burden of caring
for his mother while providing resources
for lessons (pp. 55–59). Cowell eventually
Copyright of Notes is the property of Music Library Association Inc. and its content may not
be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.