Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials
…
5 pages
1 file
According to the data given in reference [1], the worldwide energy consumption in 2008 was about 474 × 10 18 Joules. The breakdown of world's energy consumption according to the sources for the last 25 years is given in Fig. 1 [2]. From this figure
2009
An athlete sitting on a bicycle seat can produce about 100 watts of useful power on a long-term basis. After 10 hours, the athlete produces 1,000 watt-hours, or one kilowatt-hour (kWh). While some people balk at the notion of having to pay (say) 8.5 cents rather than their present 8 cents for that kilowatt-hour, what would they have to pay the athlete for ten hours of hard labor? And what would it cost for that kWh if we had to do nothing more than feed the athlete? All in all, the US (of 310 million people) uses about 100 exajoules (EJ, equal to 10 joules) per year from all sources and for all uses. On a year-round average basis (3.16 × 10s), then, we consume 10.2 kW per capita. Due to the recession this figure is down 7% from 1997 when we used 107 EJ, amounting to 10.9 kW per capita. All in all, each of us has the energy equivalent of over 100 slaves working for us night and day. Coal, oil, natural gas, uranium, firewood, hydro, wind, and solar all provide energy that is far cheap...
Nearly half the world's electricity will come from renewable energy by 2050 as costs of wind, solar and battery storage continue to plummet. That titanic shift over the next three decades will come as electricity demand increases 62% and investors pump $13.3 trillion into new projects. The move away from fossil fuel has sweeping implications for energy markets and the fight to stave off climate change. Wind, solar and batteries are poised to enable the power sector to meet its share of emission cuts required under the Paris climate agreement, at least until 2030. But after that, nations will need other technologies to make deeper cuts at a reasonable cost. By 2050, solar and wind will supply almost 50% of the world's electricity, with hydro, nuclear and other renewable energy resources providing another 21%. Coal will be the biggest loser in the power sector, with its share of global generation plunging from 37% today to 12% in 2050. Many nations can cut power-sector emissions through 2030 in line with goals set in Paris to limit the increase in world temperatures to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit). And they can do that without additional subsidies for solar and wind. Since 2010, the cost of wind power has dropped by 49%, and solar has plummeted 85%. That makes them cheaper than new coal or gas plants in two-thirds of the world. Battery storage costs, meanwhile, have dropped 85% since 2010. If the world is to completely eliminate greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity sector, technologies including carbon capture and storage, hydrogen power and solar thermal plants will compete to provide about 13,000 terawatt hours of generation by 2050. That's equivalent to about half of all electricity produced today. And even if every nation scrubs emissions from the power sector, there are still ample greenhouse gases from cars, trucks, ships, airplanes, heating systems and agriculture. The rise in energy demand is essentially a story of economic and population growth. Primary energy consumption-which encompasses virtually all demand, right down to the losses of energy as it travels across transmission and distribution lines-has boomed in developing parts of the world, even as it leveled off, or even fell, in industrialized countries. As a result, the global balance of energy demand has shifted dramatically since 1980. Back then, the U.S. consumed over a quarter of the world's energy-more than any other country. Today, it's China that uses the most. The U.S. is still a close second. Other large, emerging economies like India and Indonesia are consuming four, five, and in some cases, even six times the primary energy they did in 1980-most of it coming from fossil fuels spewing the carbon-dioxide emissions now threatening the earth's climate. In other parts of the world, clean energy sources are taking off. Renewable, nuclear and other non-fossil-fuel sources made up more than 14% of the globe's primary energy consumption in 2016. They make up an even larger share of its "final" energy use-demand after transformation and distribution losses-because fossil fuels lose more. The rise of cheap solar and wind power is helping slow the growth of carbon emissions globally-so is the decline in overall energy demand in developed nations. A recent McKinsey report projected that energy demand would plateau around 2030-thanks in large part to wealthy nations such as the U.S., Germany and Japan.
2011
We acknowledge many valuable discussions with RTI staff members. We thank David F. Myers for his role in initiating this project, James A. Trainham for valuable discussions, RTI Press former Editor-in-Chief Kathleen N. Lohr for her involvement and support during the preparation of the monograph, and Vikram Rao (of the Research Triangle Energy Consortium) for his interest in the study and insightful comments. Finally, we express our gratitude to the RTI Executive Leadership Team for initiating and supporting the Grand Challenge Initiatives of the RTI Fellows Program. Acknowledgments 2 Chapter 1 sustainability, support long-term economic prosperity, promote energy security, and reduce environmental impacts. " 2(p1) A series of reports resulted from the work, including America's Energy Future: Summary of a Meeting; 3 America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation; 2 and Real Prospects for Energy Efficiency in the United States. 4 Also of significance to our analysis is a recent National Research Council report, Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use. 5 We can group the issues considered in these reports into three main categories: technological, economic, and societal considerations. America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation 2 concludes that of these three, the "weakest link" is an insufficient understanding of the societal dimension. Accordingly, the report makes extensive calls for more data, analysis, and recommendations from the societal research disciplines. It concludes that "mobilization of the public and private sectors, supported by sustained long-term policies and investments, will be required for the decades-long effort to develop, demonstrate, and deploy these technologies. " 2(p1) The report emphasizes the need to consider "policy and societal factors that would enhance or impede technology development and deployment" 2 (p10) and observes that a "study on energy conservation would require, for example, an in-depth understanding of how societal, economic, and policy factors affect energy consumption. " 2(p33) It refers to a "behavioral gap" that hinders the introduction of energy-efficient technologies, despite their economic advantages, and calls for continuing research to understand this gap more fully so that strategies can be devised for closing it. 2(p50) Other societal research needs listed in the report include land use considerations in siting renewable technologies, opportunities for incentivizing businesses and the public, and opportunities for energy education. (For a collection of report excerpts pertaining to the societal dimension, see the appendix.) The committee's call for the societal analysis of the US energy equation has motivated us to address this important topic and thereby provide a societal research-focused complement to the National Academies' technology-focused effort. Our approach recognizes the complexity of the problem, manifest in the intricate interactions among the technological, economic, and societal dimensions of the energy challenge. Consequently, we realize that the societal dimension should be discussed not in isolation but in its integrated, holistic context, at its intersection with technology and economics. For this purpose, we formed an interdisciplinary team of investigators at RTI International, an independent research organization with expertise in all three key dimensions of the energy problem. Rejected Energy 57.07 Energy Services 42.15 Net Electricity Imports Energy Technologies 7 energy. Biomass, counted as a renewable source, contributed 3.88 quads (3.9 percent), 21 percent of which went for transportation. Approximately one-third of the total US energy consumption came from imported sources. Some notable facts about the primary US energy sources: • Despite all efforts to expand the use of renewable sources (solar, hydroelectric, wind, geothermal, and biomass in Figure 2.1), they remain a small proportion of sources overall (7.3 percent). • All of nuclear power and 91.6 percent of coal are used to generate electricity. • Transportation consumes 70.9 percent of the petroleum used in the United States. • Almost all energy imports are petroleum; in 2009 about 62 percent of petroleum and petroleum products consumed in the US came from imports. • Only 2.8 percent of natural gas is used for transportation. Energy Sources In this section we discuss the key US energy source technologies. They each have a large literature that is extensively cited in the National Academies reports. 2-5 Unless stated otherwise, the numerical data quoted in this chapter are from the US Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration database. 9 Sustainable energy Sources A number of primary energy sources are sustainable (i.e., considered inexhaustible or renewable). Among these sustainables are hydroelectric, geothermal, solar-thermal, solarelectric, wind-electric, wave-electric, and biomass energy sources. Hydroelectric Hydroelectric energy generation (2.45 quads in 2008, 2.4 percent of the total) depends on suitable geography; it is perceived to be almost fully developed in the United States. Geothermal Geothermal energy is feasible at volcanic locations, such as the edges of tectonic plates in California and Iceland. It can generate electricity by means of steam turbines or provide heating. About 0.3 percent of the world's electrical generating capacity comes from geothermal plants, with a global generating capacity of more than 10 gigawatts (GW). The largest geothermal generating site in the world is the Geysers, north of San Francisco, where 22 plants have a combined capacity of 1,517 megawatts (MW). Proposed novel 8 Chapter 2 geothermal technologies include hot (steam) wells drilled to a depth of up to 10 kilometers; this technology, if realized, would mitigate the current geographic limitations. Solar Solar energy (0.09 quads in 2008, 0.09 percent of the total) has a high but declining levelized cost (combination of capital and operating expenses, expressed as the cost of a unit quantity of energy) due to high capital expenses; therefore, to be competitive today, it requires government subsidy or needs to find niche, less cost-sensitive applications. Solar technologies are either solar-electric or solar-thermal; solar-electric technologies involve crystalline silicon (efficient but expensive), thin film (less efficient but also less expensive), and amorphous silicon (cheapest but inefficient). Solar-thermal technologies involve nonfocused sunlight for heating water or focused sunlight to generate high temperatures that can be used directly (steam turbines) or indirectly (via pyrolysis of agricultural waste into syngas, a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, followed by catalytic processing into solar biofuels). Challenges of solar energy include intermittent operation (requiring energy storage) and the need to operate at sunny, often remote locations (requiring a "smart grid" that would compensate for the uneven spatial and temporal distribution of this form of electricity). The solar plant's footprint is a function of solar irradiation intensity and of the areal efficiency of the solar cells or solar collectors. Wind Some of the challenges of wind energy (0.52 quads used in 2008, 0.5 percent of the total) are similar to those of solar energy. Both are capital intensive, intermittent, and often remote, and at present both require subsidies, energy storage, and a smart electric grid. Some issues with wind energy are associated with changing the landscape, as wind turbines tend to be huge installations, or that they interfere with birds and other wildlife, such as bats. Additional challenges include the need for addressing reliability and maintenance requirements, such as periodic cleaning to remove debris, life expectancy, and recyclability of the structures and components. The suitability of locations for developing wind energy varies significantly across the earth's surface. Like solar, wind energy is intermittent; most of the power is derived during relatively brief periods of high winds. Wind speeds change with the seasons and may or may not correspond to peak electricity demands, e.g., in the southwest United States, wind speeds tend to be low during the hot summer months, when air conditioning drives the demand for electricity. Conversely, in the United Kingdom the demand for power Energy Technologies 9 10 Chapter 2 Depletable energy Sources Most of the United States' conventional energy sources are depletable; they include the fossil fuels coal, oil, and natural gas, as well as nuclear energy. Coal The United States has hundreds of years' worth of coal (22.42 quads in 2008, 22.6 percent of the total) at current rates of consumption. Coal is the most important commodity carried by rail, at about 44 percent of Class I rail tonnage; about two-thirds of US coal shipments are by rail. Ninety-two percent of coal is used for electricity generation; 51 percent of US electricity is generated by burning coal. Coal is central to the current energy debate. The nation's ability to address this primary energy source intelligently will significantly affect the US energy future. Although coal is abundant, cheap, and domestic, it is beset with some major externalities (we discuss these unaccounted-for costs further in Chapter 3). These externalities include pollution in the form of sulfur and nitrogen oxides, mercury emissions, and about 300,000 tons of ash per GW-sized power plant per year, assuming 10 percent ash content of the coal. 10 In addition, coal-fired power plants are the most prolific sources of CO 2 emissions, both in absolute terms and on the basis of tons per kilowatt-hour (kWh); therefore, these plants are implicated in the atmospheric accumulation of this greenhouse gas. Furthermore, openface coal mining, a method widely employed in the United States today, has a significant environmental and...
Food, Energy, and Society, Third Edition, 2007
With increased energy conservation plus the adoption of diverse energy efficient technologies, the US economy could save about 32 quads or about 33% of its current energy consumption, if sound conservation energy use policies were implemented over approximately 10 years. This potential of 32 quads is slightly greater than the current US oil imports. The systems that have the greatest potential to provide major energy savings are transportation, residential energy use, and the food system. Not only saving energy has merit in itself, but it would save US citizens approximately $438 billion per year, helping support the US economy, a high standard of living, and energy security. In addition, this analysis suggests that reducing the $40 billion in taxpayer money spent on subsidies of the energy industries would further increase conservation.
2018
This brief examines trends in energy demand patterns highlighted by 2018 energy outlooks prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the International Energy Agency, and BP. The authors also explore the challenges these trends pose for policymakers around the globe in trying to meet two — often contradictory — goals: 1) raising the economic prospects for billions in the less economically developed world, which implies an increase in demand for energy, and 2) decreasing the use of fossil fuels as part of a global climate change effort.
Electronic Green Journal, 2004
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 2000
OPEC Review, 1986
THE UNITED STATES affects the Pacific energy market principally as an importer of petroleum and as an exporter of coal. In 1984, the US was in an approximate energy balance with the Western Pacific countries, importing 713 PJ of crude oil and exporting 621 PJ of coal (see note at foot ofpuge for key to symbols). The symbols and units used in this paper are as follows: Btu = British thermal unit = I,OS4.3Sjoules; d = day; J =joule: m = metre: cp = cent@oise;fi =feet; sht = short ton = 2,000 pounds; Bsht = 10'sht; yr = year: K = kilo = lo?. M = mega = 10': G = giga = 10'; P = peta = lo'!. billion = 10'. M 0 76 iii' s CD <
2021
This chapter will provide a starting point; covering a brief evolution of energy sources through time and considering the intensive use of fossil fuels and the increasing use of several renewables associated with scientific and technical revolutions. The chapter will describe the main current energy uses, their relationship with specific resource availability in different countries, the geopolitical strategic contexts, and main market trends. With the present focus on sustainability, the book's first chapter sets the basis for all contributions to this edited book, and for the following chapter that deals with economic and environmental policy. Sustainability's three main tiers will also be addressed in the book's chapters, emphasising the systemic approach to energy.
G. Rosati, M.C. Guidotti (eds.), Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Egyptologists. Florence, Italy, 23-30 August 2015, Oxford (Archaeopress egyptology 19), 2017
Tura limestone, exploited 15km south of present-day Cairo, has been extensively used in the architecture of the Old Kingdom, notably for the casing of pyramids and visible parts of temples. By contrast, other parts of contemporary monuments were built in local limestone, exploited in quarries close to the construction sites. Tura limestone is regarded as a ‘prestige’ material, most probably because its fine-grained texture allowed the execution of finely detailed reliefs, and gave the building a plain white, shining appearance. A similar stone procurement/use pattern prevailed at Thebes in the 11th Dynasty, with building stone (sandstone) and fine-grained limestone coming from a nearby upstream quarry (Dababiya), used in visible parts of the monuments. Northern Tura limestone makes its first appearance in Thebes in the reign of Amenemhat I. The chronology of the monuments of this king in the Theban area is unfortunately poorly constrained, but the use of Tura limestone blocks is evidenced at all sites where the king built (or rebuilt) temples: Tod, Armant, Dendera and Coptos, together with Dababiya limestone. Later on, Senwosret I predominantly used Tura limestone at Karnak. The specificity of Amenemhat I is that the king used both stones, from Dababiya and Tura. The reason why he did so is questioned in this paper. Constraints arising from procurement or contrasted geotechnical behaviour are ruled out, as the Dababiya quarry was to provide massive quantities of stone until the mid 18th Dynasty, and Tura and Dababiya limestones are both used for Amenemhat’s monuments, in a wholly similar way, with strongly oversized blocks. It rather seems that the introduction of Tura limestone in Theban architecture results from a mix of political and religious reasons. Politically, the use of Tura limestone helped anchor the new dynasty, just founded by Amenemhat I, in the continuity of the great rulers and builders of the Old Kingdom, and helped create, through the achievement of an ambitious architectural programme, a strong architectural link between the north and south, representing the union of the two lands. In the religious sphere, too, there was an obvious ‘mirror effect’ between northern and southern Heliopolis. This parallelism was, in a typically Egyptian way, materialized by the use of a same ‘prestige’ stone at both locations. As this was unlikely to be noticed at first glance, the kings took care to state that they used Tura limestone in explicit texts carved on Theban monuments. If in the Middle Kingdom there is an agreement between texts and the material used then this is no longer true in the New Kingdom. However, it remains important to state that the temple is built in the ‘beautiful white stone of Anu’, even though the stone comes from a nearby quarry.
Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 2011
Verbum e ius. Predicazione e sistemi giuridici nell'Occidente medievale., 2018
EDGE: 20 Essays On Contemporary Art Education, 2015
Direito e Transformação Social, 2023
Seribu Bintang, 2024
L’Inquisition romaine et la France. Juridiction, doctrine et pluralité des catholicismes européens à « l’âge tridentin » (XVe-XIXe siècle), dir. A. BURKARDT et J.-P. GAY, Rome, 2024, p. 395-414
BRILL eBooks, 2022
Advanced Engineering Forum, 2014
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2012
Nucleic Acids Research, 1994
Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1997
Studies in Visual Communication, 1983
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2012