Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021
…
10 pages
1 file
I. The Britain’s Colonial Railways in India II. The Commonwealth immigrants and the “Windrush generation” in UK
The construction of railways had a revolutionary impact on the life, culture and economy of the Indian people. The impact of railways was felt in all sectors of the Indian economy. Railways were responsible for expanding India's overseas trade and changing its orientation, they also promoted internal trade. In so doing, they were instrumental in transforming the structure of prices in India and widened the markets. The agricultural sector of the economy was deeply affected by the widening of markets. Indian agriculture became linked to world trade cycles. Thus, leading to commercialization of agriculture.
Asian Affairs, 2017
India's railway history has mainly been studied from the perspective of economic history or how it was constructed in the colonial period, through the ages. Railway management, construction, railway economics, labour, technological impacts are the major themes for research on Indian railways. Ritika Prasad's work, Tracks of Change: Railways and Everyday Life in Colonial India is a very exciting and refreshing addition to the existing historiography of Indian railways. The author fascinatingly discusses how railway became an integral part of the everyday life in colonial India and also the Indian responses, resistances to adopt the new technology or 'tools of Empire', which 'materially shaped India's History'(p.3). The brilliant scholar on railway history, Ian J Kerr, in his book 'Railways of the Raj', (Building the Railways of the Raj: 1850-1900, OUP, Delhi, 1997) discusses the menwomen and children who built the railways through their physical labour and who had only one connection with the companies i.e. 'labour power'. More recently Manu Goswami (Producing India, Chicago, 2004) and Ravi Ahuja (Pathways of Empire, 2009) explicated railways in India within a larger colonial ideology of infrastructure and public works. Thereafter the outstanding works by Laura Bear, Marian Aguiar, Nitin Sinha have also brought out the cultural and ideological dimensions of the transfer of railway technology in nineteenth century India. John Hurd
The paper analyzes the notion that Indian Railways, or rather Railways in India were built solely for Colonial interests which and it was funded by public money. The public was to bear the risk of the venture's failure if it happened but the shareholders were insulated from the loss of such venture. The paper also analyzes the effect the railway had on Indian literature and how it gave rise to a particular genre of literature in India known as the railway literature.
Diasporas, 2021
While the expansion of the London Underground coincided with that of the Indian Railways, an Indian psychogeography was quietly emerging in the marginal geographies of the Victorian imperial capital where Indian visitors, travellers, students and migrants gravitated. In their memoirs and chronicles, late-nineteenth-century travellers, Pothum Janakummah Ragaviah, Trailokyanath Mukharji, Fath Nawaz Jang, Behramji Malabari, G.P. Pillai, T.B. Pandian, among others, actively engaged with London’s railway spaces, where they found an access to architectural wonders and a platform for intracultural, transcultural and canonical mimicries to renegotiate their colonial subjectivity. New ways of seeing and recreating London’s railway spaces helped overcome colonial traumas and railway-led economic exploitation in the colony. While neighbourhoods around Baker Street, Bloomsbury and Belgravia assumed an Asiatic character, Indian memoirists learned to inhabit London in a typographical imagination, that this paper defines as Typogravia. Architectural, economic, artistic and literary consciousness overlapped in this typographical space to foreground an independent Indian aesthetic of travelling and selfhood, shaped around London’s railway spaces, which subtly but steadily drove India’s journey towards provincial autonomy.
2013
Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. 1 | P a g e
South Asian Diaspora, 2012
Unlike those who grew up in railway towns, the majority of Indians would have a hard time locating towns with quaint names on the Indian map that signified adventure, romance and the Raj. Kharagpur is one such colonial railway town whose history has been overwritten by one of the 'temples' of the postcolonial nation state, the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology. But Kharagpur, about 110 km away from Kolkata, is remembered as home in Anglo-Indian memory and finds a mention in histories and fiction dealing with the Anglo-Indian community. Senior residents of Kharagpur corroborate these memories of a vibrant Anglo-Indian community thriving in Kharagpur until the early 1960s when the exodus began. Little remains of that remembered past in the Anglo-Indian neighbourhoods where about 200 Anglo-Indian individuals struggle to resettle in the new constitutional and social space comprising independent India. Yet, the nostalgia of the Kharagpur diasporas produces it as an idyllic colonial outpost with a quintessential Raj lifestyle. Through examining the narratives and oral histories of the Kharagpur diaspora, this article complicates the way that the remembered railway town is produced as home by the community displaced by the new dynamics of power in independent India.
The railways are a form of industrial technology that cannot be entirely either private or public. The state or private companies may own the train and the station but the extent of control they have over the machine and space is limited by its very nature. It is not like an assembly line in a factory and neither is it like the small-scale tools used by artisans. One may call it "public transport" but really even public authorities such as the state cannot really claim to have control over the meanings and usages of the railway space and technology. Thus, the railways were obviously agents of order and power, a technology of discipline, but they were also widely open to indiscipline. The relationship between modernity and the railways has been analyzed in all its complexity-new forms of perception, new relations to time and space, the alienation and trauma of being in a machine ensemble, the panopticonal gaze of the railway guard, the architectural order of the railway carriage, the proletarianization of travel and the resultant upper-middle class discontent, the loss of aura from localities and objects. Much of this, however, is an attempt to look at how the railways inscribed modernity, through trauma and joy, onto the railway passenger. In essence it looks at how the railway disciplined the passenger into industrial modernity. However, little work has gone into the multiple ways in which the railways were 'misused' by different people. This essay is an attempt to rescue narratives and tales of the 'misuse of the rail' in colonial India. However, the understanding of 'misuse' will be bound by the categories of social history. We will look, not so much at individual misuses and appropriations, but at more collective forms of the same. We will look at how different sections of people used the novel technology that the rail was and is.
Dandelion, 2011
THE CONFERENCE 'BHARAT BRITAIN: SOUTH ASIANS MAKING BRITAIN 1870-1950' was a culmination of a three-year interdisciplinary and inter-institutional project 'Making Britain: South Asian Visions of Home and Abroad, 1870-1950' (2007 led by Susheila Nasta, Professor of Modern Literature at the Open University. The stated aim of this major conference was to bring together leading scholars, writers, and curators to map the diverse and little-known impact of South Asians on Britain's cultural, political, intellectual, and religious life during this period. Spread over two days across ten presentation panels, three keynotes, two conversation panels, and a concluding roundtable discussion, the conference presented the work and engagements of close to forty scholars and other personalities on this theme.
Technology and Culture, 2008
Journal of Folklore and Education, 2024
SOUTH INDIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2023
Estudos Transdisciplinares nas Engenharias 3, 2019
Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil, 2015
6 Formas en que los Académicos Pueden Apoyarse entre Sí, 2024
Membrane Technology, 2001
in Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 2022-1 (2022), pp. 56-58, no. 27, 2022
FOREX Publication, 2024
Annals of Intensive Care, 2011
Ciencia, Cultura y Sociedad, 2020
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 2010
L’apologétique chrétienne, 2012
Implementasi Literasi ICT di SD, 2022
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, 1993
The European Physical Journal C, 2010