Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020, Journal of Integrated Sciences
…
5 pages
1 file
The phenomenon of not believing in a higher power, commonly known as atheism, although popular amongst some of the millennials of the modern West, has since its existence never claimed a significant enough spot to be mentioned as a worldwide movement in the history of humans and their religious beliefs. Atheists do not use the word 'God' in explanation of the universe and everything that encompasses creation. This brief article aims to highlight the fact that true atheists have always been an extremely small percentage of the human population at any given time in history and that, as a matter of fact, religion never came to debate the existence/non-existence of a higher power, but to affirm the oneness of God-called Tawheed as polytheism was much more widespread and common deviation from the correct belief than atheism and its offsets.
Global Intellectual History, 2019
With the number of atheists and nonreligious people at an all-time global high, scholars have become increasingly interested in the study of atheism, including its history. There is, however, disagreement about how best to conceptualise what is being studied. This article ventures to rethink the terminology we use to frame the field, and in particular the extent to which it can be applied beyond Western modernity. While ‘atheism’ or ‘unbelief’ are perhaps the most common ways to talk about this field, both fall short in various ways. ‘Atheism’ fails to grasp the diversity of religious unbelief by centring focus on the question of God’s existence. Even a term like ‘unbelief’, while getting around the narrowness of the term ‘atheism’, creates problems of its own, namely its emphasis on ‘belief’ as the defining aspect of religious experience. An alternative term – ‘nonreligion’ – might help us around this issue, but, while the term is broader than ‘atheism’ or ‘unbelief’, it too runs into difficulties, particularly the fact that it is parasitic upon the term ‘religion’, a category whose universal applicability has been called into question.
Cambridge History of Atheism, 2021
As the present volume demonstrates, atheism has a long history that spans multiple countries and eras, but even more than that, the history of atheism itself has a history. The goal of this chapter is to offer a look at how historians and other scholars over time have tried to tell the story of atheism. Because of space limitations, this cannot approach a comprehensive study of works on the history of atheism. Rather I focus specifically on those works which discuss the history of atheism on a large scale, across many centuries and multiple countries. The chapter highlights some of the key issues in writing the history of atheism, and the various ways these might be addressed. To draw out these issues, I have divided histories of atheism into two main schools: those writing from an atheist or secular perspective and those writing from a Christian or theological perspective. It is important to note that I am constructing this division for purposes of analysis and authors might not necessarily position themselves as writing from a particular "school." Likewise, works on the history of atheism need not fall into either camp, although it is true that this topic has frequently attracted partisans on either side to write about the topic, which in turn influences the kind of histories they write. It should also be noted that works on either side need not be seen as more or less scholarly than the other. With these caveats in mind, I believe dividing the chapter in this way helps to bring to the fore some of the major questions and disagreements about the history of atheism. Some of the key questions we will see in this chapter are: What is atheism? Is it merely a rejection of theism (i.e. a negative thing) or is it a positive and constructive worldview that exists independently of theism and moves beyond simply offering arguments against theism? When and where does atheism emerge? Is it a universal phenomenon or contingent on particular contexts? What should the history of atheism be about? Should it be about explaining how atheism arose, or should it be about explaining how atheists lived, the contributions they made, and their fight for their freedom of conscience? What is the future trajectory of atheism based on the study of its history? Is it only getting stronger or has it already reached its peak and is now declining? As we will see, the two perspectives offer different answers to these questions.
Journal of Religion in Europe, 2012
Varieties of Atheism, 2022
This introduction argues that defining atheism narrowly in terms of belief makes it into an abstraction that misrepresents atheism as it actually exists. To this end, I develop a brief genealogy of atheism - from the premodern period into the present - which indicates that atheism has encompassed ethical commitments, political aims, and emotional experiences. This expanded understanding opens the possibility of a complex conversation between particular forms of atheism and particular religious traditions - which is the possibility that this collection explores.
Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences, 2018
Testament? And who in mainstream Christianity is aware of the importance of 1 Enoch? the book of Jubilees? the Psalms of Solomon? At most there is awareness of the Dead Sea Scrolls, however much misunderstood. The answer to this religious ferment, Jenkins says, lies in the Hellenistic period. The Jews in their homeland and the diaspora came into increased contact with Hellenistic philosophy, and Mesopotamian and Persian religious traditions. The so-called (and often neglected and little understood) Intertestamental Period, whose prolific writings shaped our modern notions of the afterlife, angels, apocalyptic, cosmic warfare, and so on, often escapes modern attention even from some scholars let alone the public because many of the surviving writings are either seen as "apocryphal" and so not in modern (Protestant) Bibles or are fragments or in languages such as Aramaic, or else in fairly inaccessible Greek texts. The Mesopotamian region, opened up to Greeks via the conquests of Alexander the Great, was crucial in the transmission of ideas from Persia to the West where Platonic thought was being developed. The brutality of life and the factional struggles in the area of (historic, note please, as Jenkins also does) Palestine where the Seleucid empire was losing its grip led to an apocalyptic flurry, where justice, however defined, might eventually triumph and wrongs be avenged. There was a need to believe in the Afterlife. In the first century CE, Roman repression and the destruction of the Temple led to a reconstruction of Judaism away from a religion of sacrifice with a particular place to call its own. The legacies of the Crucible years, as Jenkins shows, are not only to be found in Christianity and Judaism but also in Islam. These were the survivors. Others like Manichaeism, the Christian offshoot with an emphasis on dualism, and the varied forms of Gnosticism, did not fare so well but have left traces in modern thinking also. The wisdom and prescience of Jenkins are much needed today. It is to be hoped that he will continue writing and that this book will be read and attended to by those who want to understand the role of religion in culture.
Review of The Evolution of Atheism: The Politics of a Modern Movement, by Stephen Le Drew (2016), Atheists: The Origin of the Species, by Nick Spencer (2014), and Imagine There's No Heaven: How Atheism Helped Create the Modern World, by Mitchell Stephens
Studia Gilsoniana, 2018
The author considers the problem of atheism. She discusses the history of atheism, forms of atheism, and the causes and motives of atheism. She concludes that (a) the history of the negation of God indirectly confirms the endurance of the idea of God and the affirmation of God throughout time; although there are various forms of the negation of God, the idea of God persists, for there is no ultimate negation that could resolve this question once and for all; (b) an erroneous conception of God could be a motivation for seeking a better understanding and expression of the truth about God in a more suitable and more easily understood language; (c) systems that presuppose absolute atheism (like those of Marx, Nietzsche, Sartre) show that with the negation of God all other values collapse and are supplanted by relativism and, ultimately, nihilism; (d) the myth of the “deified” man has not been verified in practical Marxism nor in the “supermanhood” of certain nations; the various absolutes that man has established—Man, Humanity, Nature, Science, History—are not sufficient, and ultimately along with the “death of God” they lead to the “death of man.”
Déluges et autres destructions. Les récits de la fin en Méditerranée orientale ancienne, 2023
Missiology an International Review, 2015
Indian journal of positive psychology, 2015
South Atlantic Review, 2015
Mevzu – Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2024
Revista Ensayo y Error, , 2003
Indonesian Journal of Laboratory
Biophysical Journal
IEEE Xplore, 2024
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika
Ghana Journal of Science, Technology and Development, 2016
Journal of traditional medicine & clinical naturopathy, 2018
Journal of Archaeological Science, 1992