Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021, Journal of the Civil War Era
…
7 pages
1 file
Guest Editor's Introduction to special issue on relationship between (North American) Southern and Western history.
Journal of The Historical Society, 2011
REGION HAS ALWAYS mattered in American history. The United States is so large and its topography, climate, and resources so varied that the regions have naturally developed in very different ways. Geography has shaped economic prowess, settlement patterns, immigration choices, and folkways, all of which has made this country a very complicated place. Claims to regional distinctiveness in the nineteenth century made sense, and Americans often celebrated such distinctions. Be they Tarheels, Bay-Staters, Hoosiers, or Cornhuskers, they felt proud of their native regions. Modern-day scholars have investigated these regional cultures and produced a bountiful literature on the South, New England, the Midwest, and the Far West. These claims to distinctiveness still make sense. Genuine differences persist in cultural identity, and they are reflected in the divergent historical memories prevailing in various sections of the country. For many Americans, these collective memories provide a comfortable tribal identity, a sense of belonging. 1
The American Historical Review, 1998
The Journal of American History, 2018
Interest in Civil War memory and post-Civil War sectional reconciliation has expanded greatly in recent years, as two 2016 historiographical essays attest. 1 Matthew E. Stanley's new book, The Loyal West: Civil War and Reunion in Middle America is thus well timed to make an important contribution to our evolving understanding of the process of sectional reconciliation in the decades following the Civil War. With his focus on Kentucky's northern neighbors in the lower portions of Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio, the editorial staff of the Register of the Kentucky Historical Society believe Stanley's book will help historians better understand the role Kentucky played in the events of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, which saw a white supremacist version of Civil War memory eclipse an emancipationist version nationally. We have asked four nineteenth-century historians to consider Stanley's book from varying perspectives. M. Keith Harris teaches history at a private high school in Los Angeles, California. He is the author of Across the Bloody Chasm: The Culture of Commemoration among Civil War Veterans (2014) and is currently writing a book on D. W. Griffith's controversial 1915 silent film, The Birth of a Nation.
Journal of Southern History, 2017
European journal of American studies
The Old South's Modern Worlds: Slavery, Region, and Nation in the Age of Progress, is a volume of essays that aims to question traditional views of Southern history and culture. Positioning itself against popular stereotypes and a vast body of professional scholarship that promotes conceptualizations of the antebellum South as unprogressive, insular, and trapped in its own traditions, The Old South's Modern Worlds rewards its reader with a broad-ranging examination of the South's negotiation with the forces of modernization, both national and international, in the antebellum era. According to the editors, the view of the South as parochial is based on a reductionist opposition that pits a "backward-looking," "essentialized" Old South against a "forward-looking," "dynamic and diverse" North. To recast the Old South as a site of change and progress, this study undercuts simplistic as well as historically inaccurate articulations of the Old South as the "anti-North," and attempts to offer a fresh perspective on Southern history and culture by emphasizing "the region's diversity, modernity, and global interconnections."
Native South, 2017
It is not news to readers of Native South that the standard defi nitions of "southerners, " "southern culture, " and "southern history" exclude American Indians. In the essay that introduced this journal to the public in 2008, founding editors James Taylor Carson, Robbie Ethridge, and Greg O'Brien voiced their frustrations about the fi eld's myopia. "Th e metanarrative, " they observed, reveals "a deep impression that southern social relations were singly derived from and are still predicated on the binary racial construct of black and white. " 1 Th eir observation remains accurate nearly a decade later. Debates continue to focus extensively upon the consequences of tobacco, rice, and cotton culture. Prominent works on southern history explore in great detail the origins and evolution of African slavery, the emergence of a planter mentalité, the development of slave societies, the violence inherent in early modern race relations, and the contradiction between the rhetoric of the American Revolution and the reality of slavery. Th ey subsequently examine the political, social, religious, economic, and gendered debates that sowed the seeds of sectional controversy as the nineteenth century progressed. Aft er the Civil War, southern historiography focuses heavily on economic discrimination, white supremacy campaigns, the construction of Jim Crow laws, the Great Migration, and the origins and evolution of the long civil rights movement. Th is narrative is unquestionably sophisticated and illuminating, and has come a long way since the days of the "Lost Cause" espoused by scholars such as J. G. de Roulhac Hamilton, U. B. Phillips, and William Archibald Dunning. But the metanarrative remains the same: to study southern history is to explore a biracial story. 2 To be sure, highly respected scholars of the Indian experience have
Contesting Slavery: The Politics of Freedom and Bondage in the New American Nation, 2011
Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies, 2008
Despite all the hullabaloo about 'globalisation' and despite economic and legal differences between the South and the rest of the United States being smaller than, say, fifty years ago, Southern regional identity continues to exert a pull on the region and nation, but in a peculiar way. Namely, even though the South (or at least a lot of the 'white folk' within it) made a bid to become a nationstate, it did so on distinctively and consciously American terms, drawing on the legacy of the Revolutionary War in its rhetoric. Indeed, a former president of the United States, John Tyler, served in the Confederate Congress. 1 Ulrich Phillips once claimed of the Ohio River that '[t]he northern shore is American without question; the southern is American with a difference'. 2 I am not going to use this essay proving that Southerners still have a distinct regional identity, but rather want to look at how some of the key cornerstones of that identity-the legacy of the Civil War, segregation and so forth-have been and continue to be, in many quarters, written out of the main story of 'Southern heritage'. Yet, these issues, acknowledged or not, continue even now to define the region. There is a central contradiction: while Southern identity remains thoroughly interwoven with a more general American nationality, it is none the less premised on a society that, whether through slavery, Ku Klux Klan violence or Jim Crow segregation, denied equality to black Americans. And while anti-black racism was hardly an exclusively Southern phenomenon, the legacy of slavery, and indeed the fomenting of a Civil War to preserve it, have connected the region, both in fact and in the perception of many Southerners, to the legacy of racism. 3 While the 'Fugitives' (who included
Journal of Historical Geography, 2001
Academia Biology, 2024
Building Modern Jewish Culture: The Yiddish Kultur-Lige, ed. by Harriet L. Murav, Gennady Estraikh and Myroslav Shkandrij (Oxford: Legenda, 2023)
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2024
B P International, 2022
Archaeologia Adriatica 15, 241-257, 2021
International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2008
Fichte-Studien , 2024
Baptist Quarterly, 2024
IGT na Rede, 2013
Physical Review Materials
Misión Jurídica, 2015
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2011
Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2023
Hispania Sacra, 2018
The Moldovan Medical Journal, 2023
Madison Journal of Literary Criticism , 2019