Diplomacy: Theory and Practice Course Evaluations - Koc University
Ipek Ruacanvisibility
…
description
15 pages
link
1 file
Related papers
Students’ Course Grades Analysis “Practical Case”
East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
To maintain the benefits and improve the course procedure for the next year, this work is devoted to evaluating my course of computer at the faculty of tourism at the Lebanese University during the academic year 2021–2022. Additionally, we want to mention that this method can be used as a model for any similar course evaluation. According to the results, some variables of grades are normally distributed while others are not normally distributed. The final grade average and partial grade average for each student are different from one another. Final grades were statistically equal for both male and female students. The final grade average for this year and last year is the same. There is a correlation between participation and presence grades and the other grades, except the mid-exam grades. Also, the final grades and all other grades, except the mid-exam grades, are correlated. For the following year, we need to make sure that students attend more lectures to raise their grades. Als...
Student Evaluations
Organization-The ins tructor us ed clas s time well 16 53% 4.56 5.08 5.50 5.50 Clarity-The ins tructor communicated cours e material clearly 16 53% 4.75 4.90 5.20 5.20 Learning Focus ed-The ins tructor's teaching methods helped s tudents learn 16 53% 5.00 4.
Chapter 1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING
Respondent #2 -17 years old Respondent #3 -16 years old Respondent #4 -15 years old Respondent #5 -16 years old Respondent #6 -16 years old Respondent #7 -15 years old Respondent #8 -15 years old Respondent #9 -15 years old Respondent #10 -15 years old Respondent #11 -16 years old Respondent #12 -16 years old Respondent #13 -16 years old Question #2 -What is your general average last school year? Respondent #1 -95.62 Respondent #2 -96.31 Respondent #3 -94.313 Respondent #4 -96.250 Respondent #5 -95.969 Respondent #6 -95.9380 Respondent #7 -95.438 31 Respondent #8 -94.844 Respondent #9 -94.719 Respondent #10 -94.444 Respondent #11 -94.376 Respondent #12 -94.375 Respondent #13 -94. 344 Question #3 -What honors did you received? Respondent #1 -3 rd Respondent #2 -1 st Respondent #3 -9 th Respondent #4 -1 st Respondent #5 -2 nd Respondent #6 -3 rd Respondent #7 -4 th Respondent #8 -5 th Respondent #9 -6 th Respondent #10 -7 th Respondent #11 -8 th Respondent #12 -9 th Respondent #13 -10 th
2. DIVISION OF STUDENTS ACCORDING TO LEVEL
ddd.uab.cat
Assessment Aspects in the Master of Second Level in Foreign Language Teaching
Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2014
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of assessment practices in students' final grade in the course Teaching Methodology, a subject in the Master of Second Level (MSL) program in foreign language teaching in the Faculty of Foreign Languages at Tirana University, more specifically in English and Italian branch (N = 247). The sample was chosen based on convenience. In order to judge on the impact of: lecture attendance, seminar attendance, portfolio assignments, course assignment and final examination, was kept rigorous evidence of the points collected from students for each of the above aspects of assessment throughout the first semester of the academic year 2010-2011. By processing and analyzing the data, it resulted that from the statistical point of view, these assessment components exhibit significant positive relationship with the final grade in this subject, namely: lecture attendance (.53), seminar attendance (.72), portfolio assignments (.72), course assignment (.67) and final exam (.70). Likewise, these variables positively predict the final grade of the course. In particular, lecture attendance (R2 = 21.2 %), and the course assignment (R2 = 9.1 %) proved to be predictive of the final grade. Furthermore, portfolio assessment (R2 = 9.7 %) affects positively the final achievements because it is a way of inviting students to learn systematically and practically and an opportunity for the lecturer to assess students based on their output.
Teaching evaluation and student response rate
PSU Research Review, 2018
The purpose of this paper is to share the author’s viewpoint on how to increase student response rate in course evaluation surveys.
Teaching Assessment: How Do You Do It?
2003 Annual Conference Proceedings
A1. This instructor encouraged students to be responsible for their own learning. A2. This instructor used effective techniques for learning, both in class and for out-of-class assignments. A3. My instructor cared about my learning in this course. A4. My instructor demonstrated respect for cadets as individuals. A5. My fellow students contributed to my learning in this course. A6. My motivation to learn and to continue learning has increased because of this course. B1. This instructor stimulated my thinking. B2. In this course, my critical thinking ability increased. B3. The homework assignments, papers, and projects in this course could be completed within the USMA time guideline of two hours preparation for each class attendance. Department Level Questions: C1. In this course, my instructor served as a professional role model for cadets. C2. My instructor demonstrated depth of knowledge in the subject matter. C3. My instructor demonstrated enthusiasm for teaching and for the subject matter. C4. My instructor had a structure or plan for every lesson's learning activities. C5. My instructor helped me to understand the importance and practical significance of this course. C6. My instructor used well-articulated learning objectives to guide my learning. C7. My instructor communicated effectively. C8. My instructor demonstrated that he or she cares about my learning. C9. My instructor demonstrated positive expectations of the cadets in the class. C10. My instructor used visual images (pictures, demonstrations, models, diagrams, simulations, etc.) to enhance my learning. C11. My instructor gave me timely and accurate feedback on my learning progress. C12. In this course, the exams were fair and relevant.
Koç University Course-Instructor Survey
College:CASE - Student Count:19
KUSIS ID - Name:55264-İPEK ZEYNEP RUACAN
Course Code - Number : INTL-452-01-ST INTL
EG: Extremely Good (+3)
VG: Very Good (+2)
G: Good (+1)
Semester and Year :2191-Fall 2019
F: Fair (0)
1 - The level of instructor's preparedness for classes was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,69 - Participation: 68%
P: Poor (-1)
EP: Extremely Poor (-3)
VP: Very Poor (-2)
2 - The instructor's ability to communicate and explain effectively was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,85 - Participation: 68%
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
69%
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
85%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3 - The instructor's willingness to provide help when needed was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,92 - Participation: 68%
12
4 - The instructor's use of class time effectively was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,46 - Participation: 68%
8
10
6
8
6
4
4
2
2
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
92%
7.7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
62%
23% 15%
5 - The instructor's enthusiasm (e.g. energy, encouragement, motivation)
was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,85 - Participation: 68%
G
F
P
VP
EP
0%
0%
0%
0%
6 - The level of instructor's concern for students' learning and progress
was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,69 - Participation: 68%
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
85%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
77%
15% 7.7%
G
F
P
VP
EP
0%
0%
0%
0%
7 - The instructor's attitude towards students was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,77 - Participation: 68%
10
8 - The amount of knowledge gained from this course was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,08 - Participation: 68%
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
77%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
62%
9 - The materials used in the course (books, handouts, readings, etc.)
were:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,38 - Participation: 68%
VG
G
F
P
7.7% 15% 7.7% 7.7%
VP
EP
0%
0%
10 - In terms of helping me learn the subject matter, the teaching methods
(e.g. lecturing, in-class activities, group work, discussions) were:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,46 - Participation: 68%
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
G
F
EG
VG
62%
23% 7.7% 7.7%
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
0%
0%
0%
69%
15% 7.7% 7.7%
11 - The methods used to measure learning (e.g. exams, papers, reports,
projects) were:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,46 - Participation: 68%
6
6
4
4
2
2
G
F
VG
15% 7.7% 7.7%
P
VP
EP
0%
0%
0%
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,62 - Participation: 68%
8
EG
F
12 - The course's organization (e.g. structure, completeness, logical flow)
was:
8
69%
G
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
0%
0%
0%
69%
23% 7.7%
G
F
P
VP
EP
0%
0%
0%
0%
14 - Overall, the instructor was:
13 - The instructor's content knowledge was:
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,77 - Participation: 68%
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,77 - Participation: 68%
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
77%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
77%
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
15 - Overall, the course was:
16 - What grade do you think you will get from this course at the end of this
semester?
Number of answers: 13 - Mean: 2,54 - Participation: 68%
Number of answers: 13 - Participation: 68%
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
77%
15%
0%
0%
7.7%
0%
0%
17 - During the semester, about how many hours per week did you study
for this course, outside of the official class meetings (e.g. lectures, labs,
problem or discussion sessions)?
Number of answers: 13 - Participation: 68%
A+
0%
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
3-4
0%
>4
7.7%
CD+ D or F
0%
0%
Number of answers: 13 - Participation: 68%
6
2-3
23%
BC+
31%
18 - How many classes of this course did you miss during this semester?
6
1-2
<1
23% 46%
AB+
69%
None 1-2
15% 46%
3-5
38%
6-9
0%
>10
0%
19 - The level of difficulty in this course was:
For Question 19
ED: Extremely Difficult
Number of answers: 13 - Participation: 68%
D: Difficult
NEND: Neither Easy nor Difficult
8
E: Easy
6
EE: Extremely Easy
4
2
ED
0%
D
15%
NEND
69%
E
15%
EE
0%
Benchmark with College and University Benchmark
CASE
İPEK ZEYNEP RUACAN
Q1
Q2
UNIVERSITY
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-3
-3
-3
Q7
-3
Q8
-3
Q9
Q10
-3
Q11
Q12
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-3
-3
-3
-3
Q13
-3
Q14
Q15
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
-1
-1
-1
-2
-2
-2
-3
-3
-3
-3
Koç University Course-Instructor Survey Comments
KUSIS ID - Name:55264-İPEK ZEYNEP RUACAN
Course Code - Number : INTL-452-01-ST INTL
-
College:CASE - Student Count:19
Semester and Year :2191-Fall 2019
"+
Packed with visits of real-life diplomats, unmatchable opportunity.
Extremely encouraging, intelligent, and kind professor.
Feels like a 100 level course, very little knowledge gained due to lack of any intellectual depth (despite how much prof
seemed to know)
Presentation summaries removed incentive to read actual texts learning
No in-class negotiations or diplomacy practice"
-
"We are studying international relations and we didnt have diplomacy course nor did we have diplomacy track before this
class talk about the irony.
Anyway the teacher is great, she is an effective speaker and teacher and she contacted diplomats from different nationalities
and brought them to our university."
-
The teacher was very good in explaining the material. However the speakers were kind of boring.
Koç University Course-Instructor Survey
College:CASE - Student Count:14
KUSIS ID - Name:55264-İPEK ZEYNEP RUACAN
Course Code - Number : INTL-452-01-ST INTL
EG: Extremely Good (+3)
VG: Very Good (+2)
G: Good (+1)
Semester and Year :2192-Spring 2020
F: Fair (0)
1 - The level of instructor's preparedness for classes was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,67 - Participation: 43%
P: Poor (-1)
EP: Extremely Poor (-3)
VP: Very Poor (-2)
2 - The instructor's ability to communicate and explain effectively was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,67 - Participation: 43%
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
67%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3 - The instructor's willingness to provide help when needed was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,67 - Participation: 43%
4
4 - The instructor's use of class time effectively was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,83 - Participation: 43%
5
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
67%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
83%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5 - The instructor's enthusiasm (e.g. energy, encouragement, motivation)
was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,83 - Participation: 43%
6 - The level of instructor's concern for students' learning and progress
was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,50 - Participation: 43%
3.0
5
2.5
4
2.0
3
1.5
2
1.0
1
0.5
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
83%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7 - The instructor's attitude towards students was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,50 - Participation: 43%
8 - The amount of knowledge gained from this course was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,17 - Participation: 43%
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
17% 33%
9 - The materials used in the course (books, handouts, readings, etc.)
were:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,17 - Participation: 43%
2.5
2.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
VG
17% 33%
G
P
VP
EP
0%
0%
0%
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,00 - Participation: 43%
3.0
EG
F
0%
10 - In terms of helping me learn the subject matter, the teaching methods
(e.g. lecturing, in-class activities, group work, discussions) were:
3.0
50%
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
17% 17% 17%
11 - The methods used to measure learning (e.g. exams, papers, reports,
projects) were:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,00 - Participation: 43%
G
F
P
VP
EP
0%
0%
0%
12 - The course's organization (e.g. structure, completeness, logical flow)
was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,33 - Participation: 43%
4
3.0
2.5
3
2.0
2
1.5
1.0
1
0.5
G
F
EG
VG
50%
17% 17% 17%
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
0%
0%
0%
67%
0% 33%
G
F
P
VP
EP
0%
0%
0%
0%
14 - Overall, the instructor was:
13 - The instructor's content knowledge was:
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,67 - Participation: 43%
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,67 - Participation: 43%
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
EG
VG
G
F
P
VP
EP
67%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
15 - Overall, the course was:
16 - What grade do you think you will get from this course at the end of this
semester?
Number of answers: 6 - Mean: 2,33 - Participation: 43%
3.0
Number of answers: 6 - Participation: 43%
4
2.5
3
2.0
1.5
2
1.0
1
0.5
EG
VG
50%
33% 17%
G
F
P
VP
EP
0%
0%
0%
0%
17 - During the semester, about how many hours per week did you study
for this course, outside of the official class meetings (e.g. lectures, labs,
problem or discussion sessions)?
Number of answers: 6 - Participation: 43%
A+
17%
3
3
2
2
1
1
3-4
0%
>4
0%
CD+ D or F
0%
0%
Number of answers: 6 - Participation: 43%
4
2-3
0%
BC+
17%
18 - How many classes of this course did you miss during this semester?
4
1-2
<1
33% 67%
AB+
67%
None 1-2
0% 67%
3-5
17%
6-9
17%
>10
0%
19 - The level of difficulty in this course was:
For Question 19
ED: Extremely Difficult
Number of answers: 6 - Participation: 43%
5
D: Difficult
NEND: Neither Easy nor Difficult
4
E: Easy
EE: Extremely Easy
3
2
1
ED
0%
D
17%
NEND
83%
E
0%
EE
0%
Benchmark with College and University Benchmark
CASE
İPEK ZEYNEP RUACAN
Q1
Q2
UNIVERSITY
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-3
-3
-3
Q7
-3
Q8
-3
Q9
Q10
-3
Q11
Q12
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-3
-3
-3
-3
Q13
-3
Q14
Q15
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
-1
-1
-1
-2
-2
-2
-3
-3
-3
-3
Koç University Course-Instructor Survey Comments
KUSIS ID - Name:55264-İPEK ZEYNEP RUACAN
Course Code - Number : INTL-452-01-ST INTL
-
College:CASE - Student Count:14
Semester and Year :2192-Spring 2020
Related papers
Sacred Images, Candles, Bags and Figs: Materiality and Sensory Agency in the Religious Experience of Late Medieval Women
Cahiers d’études italiennes , 2024
Should Fanon Be Considered One of the Founders of Existential Psychology? Considering His Contributions for Existential Clinical Practice
16th Annual Society for Humanistic Psychology Conference, 2024
The Implementation of Grade 11 Science Program in Public Secondary Schools: Teachers' Pedagogical Practices and Problems Encountered in Teaching Science
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2020
Kierkegaard's Deep Diversity: The One and the Many
Kierkegaard and Issues in Contemporary Ethics, 2020
Arapça – Türkçe Çeviri Türlerinde Nöral Makine Çeviri Modellerinin Verimliliği: ChatGPT Örneği
Şarkiyat mecmuası, 2023
The Concept of Eternity in Kant and Post-Kantian European Thought (2016)
Yitzhak Melamed (ed.) Eternity (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016), pp. 179-225
Analisis Pengaturan Quarter-Car Active Suspension Menggunakan Neuro-Fuzzy Adaptif PID Control
Jurnal Fokus Elektroda : Energi Listrik, Telekomunikasi, Komputer, Elektronika dan Kendali), 2021
German Baroque and 'Sonderrokoko': canonising and 'nationalising' the arts in Germany during the long nineteenth century Review of Review of: U. Engel, Stil und Nation: Barockforschung und deutsche Kunstgeschichte, ca. 1830-1933 (2018)
Journal of Art Historiography, 2019
"TANÁROK TANÁRA": DR. LÁZÁR PIROSKA ÉS LEÁNY-KÖZÉPISKOLÁJA EGY (IZRAELITA) NÖVENDÉK EMLÉKEZETÉBEN
Publicationes Universitatis Miskolcinensis, Sectio Philosophica Tomus XXVII, Fasc. 3 (2023), pp. 167–184. ISSN 1219–5448, 2023
Natural Bioactive Compounds with Small-Bowel Glucose/Antiabsorption and Sugar Digestion Enzymes’ Inhibition Actions: New Strategy to Relieve Hyperglycemia and Diabetes
Recent Advances in Biology and Medicine, 2019
Penny pricing and the components of spread and depth changes
Journal of Banking & Finance, 2004
SEJARAH DOKUMENTASI DI INDONESIA
Tugas Mata Kuliah Penerbitan Media, 2022
Intelligent nanoscopic road safety model for cycling infrastructure
2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), 2021
Compositional and Geochemical Signatures for the Sedimentary Evolution of the Middle Triassic–Lower Jurassic Continental Redbeds from Western-Central Mediterranean Alpine Chains
The Journal of Geology, 2008
Analisis Ketidaksesuaian Kompetensi Pegawai Pada Badan Pengelola Keuangan Dan Aset Daerah Kota Magelang
Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 2021