K R Westphal: Published Research (list)

KENNETH R. WESTPHAL, M.A.E. Research Publications (January 2024) ORCiD: 0000-0001-6039-760X BOOKS: Monographs: 1. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories: Critical Re-Examination, Elucidation & Corroboration; Kant’s Revised Second (B) Edition (1787), German Text with Parallel New Translation, for Students, Philosophers, Cognitive Scientists and Specialists. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 2021a.R (Open access; 111 pp.). https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-7 This book presents, elucidates, reconstructs and defends Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories, showing how his Deduction is valid and sound, independently of any appeal to transcendental idealism. Demonstrates how Kant’s Deduction pertains to contemporary issues regarding consciousness and self-consciousness in epistemology, philosophy of mind, philosophy of language and cognitive sciences. Concise, exoteric for students, lucid for nons-specialists, yet specific for experts.1 2. Kant’s Critical Epistemology: Why Epistemology must Consider Judgment First. Foreword by Paolo PARRINI (Firenze). New York & London: Routledge, 2021b; softcover: 2022.R (xxiii + 367 pp.) This book examines, assesses and defends Kant’s Critical epistemology, and the rich yet neglected resources it brings to bear on issues about human experience, perceptual judgment and empirical knowledge – including causal realism – which were obscured and neglected by preoccupation with so-called ‘transcendental arguments’. I aim to make Kant’s Critical epistemology intelligible and attractive to epistemologists, historians & philosophers of science (HPS) today. I first examine prominent themes in recent epistemology and identify some important points of intersection between Kant’s Critical epistemology and contemporary, especially post-Gettier epistemology. This includes critical appraisal of several key works of analytical Kantianism by C.I. Lewis, P.F. Strawson and Wilfrid Sellars, some neglected themes in Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations, and John McDowell’s attempts to harness Kant’s and Hegel’s views to his diagnostic aims. One central finding I call Kant’s Thesis of Singular Cognitive Reference; this thesis aligns Kant’s epistemology with such contemporaries as J.L. Austin, Gareth Evans, David Kaplan, Keith Donnellan, Fred Dretske, John Perry, Howard Wettstein and Charles Travis – though Kant’s Critical epistemology buttresses their views about singular reference and greatly augments their views on singular refer1 ‘This compact book will be of very considerable interest to scholars in philosophy and in cognitive science working on Kant’s Kritik der reinen Vernunft / Critique of Pure Reason, especially those concerned with perceptual judgment and with self-consciousness, self-ascription or apperception. It is also an ideal text for advanced courses and seminars treating Kant’s 1787 version of the Transcendental Deduction. The book is constructed to strongly promote running comparison of Kant’s German prose with Westphal’s highly competent translation. Westphal’s succinct analytic commentary culls through two centuries worth of secondary literature to lay out the essential terminological, conceptual, and historical presuppositions of Kant’s key claims and arguments. For decades now, I have been looking for a bilingual edition of the 1787 Deduction suitable for advanced teaching purposes—an edition of the format and sharply focussed scholarly quality exhibited by Westphal’s book. It is especially gratifying to know that this work is freely accessible to everyone’. – Jeffrey EDWARDS (U. Stony Brook). REVIEWS: Kantian Review 27.2 (2022):341–4 (J. Johannson), DOI: 10.1017/S1369415421000649; Hegel Bulletin 43.3 (2022):491–496 (A. Stephenson), DOI: 10.1017/hgl.2022.31; History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 25 (2022):405–420 (L. Scaglia), DOI: 10.30965/26664275-bja10062. 1 ence by demonstrating the discriminatory character of causal-perceptual judgments within our actual worldly circumstances. Kant’s Thesis of Singular Cognitive Reference undergirds Newton’s Rule 4 of scientific method, and demonstrates that justificatory infallibilism is in principle irrelevant to all non-formal domains. It supports Newton’s causal realism about gravitational force, in part by exposing a crucial infallibilist fallacy underpinning Bas van Fraassen’s ‘Constructive Empiricism’, neglected for 40 years.2 3. Hegel’s Civic Republicanism: Integrating Natural Law with Kant’s Moral Constructivism. New York & London: Routledge, 2020a; softcover: 2022.R (xx + 327 pp.) Thoroughly re-examines, assesses and defends Hegel’s moral philosophy (justice, ethics and philosophy of education) and its relation to Kant’s, highlighting Hegel’s use of Kant’s constructivist method for identifying and justifying fundamental, strictly universal moral norms, and shows how Hegel’s practical philosophy remedies the (few) shortcomings he (rightly) identified in Kant’s views. Thoroughly re-constructs, assesses and defends of Hegel’s enormous contribution to Modern Natural Law Constructivism (initiated by Hume and developed by Rousseau and Kant), its normative cogency and its great contemporary significance: Hegel’s moral philosophy provides the most cogent analysis and justification of civic republicanism for modern commercial societies. 4. Grounds of Pragmatic Realism: Hegel’s Internal Critique & Transformation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2018a. (xiv +546pp.; Critical Studies in German Idealism 20, ed. P. Cobben.) Examines, reconstructs and defends Hegel’s deepening insights in his Jena essays (1801–06) into basic problems confronting Kant’s Transcendental Idealism and Schelling’s intellectual intuitionism, which launch Hegel’s philosophical revolution in the Phenomenology of Spirit, which develops the sound features of Kant’s Critical philosophy into the first and still one of the most sophisticated and adequate pragmatic, social & historical account of rational justification in substantive domains, which justifies realism about the objects of empirical knowledge and strict objectivity about fundamental moral norms. Focussing Hegel’s phenomenological groundwork for his Science of Logic in this way reveals how this latter work insightfully develops Kant’s critique of rational judgment and justification (across his Critical corpus), by dispensing with Transcendental Idealism whilst augmenting Kant’s transcendental methods of analysis and proof, together with Kant’s specifically cognitive semantics of singular reference. (3 parts, 21 chapters) 5. How Hume and Kant Reconstruct Natural Law: Justifying Strict Objectivity without Debating Moral Realism. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 2016a. (xvi + 272 pp.)3 The differences between Hume’s and Kant’s moral philosophies are prominent in the literature. Yet focussing on them occludes a decisive, shared achievement: a distinctive constructivist method to identify basic moral principles and to justify their strict objectivity, without invoking moral realism nor moral anti- or irrealism. Their constructivism is based in Hume’s key insight that ‘though the laws of justice are artificial, they are not arbitrary’. Arbitrariness in basic moral principles is avoided by starting with fundamental problems of social coördination which concern out2 REVIEWS: Revista de Estudios Kantianos 7,1 (2022): 264–270 (C.S. Alvarez), DOI: 10.7203/REK.7.1.24027; Argumenta (philarchive.org; May 2021), 366–373 (E. Erkan). 3 REVIEW ARTICLE: Slavenko ŠLJUKIÆ (2017), ‘The Contstructivistic Defence of the Objectivity of Moral Standards and Natural Law that Does not Require the Debate on Moral Realism’, Filozofia i Društvo/ Philosophy and Society (Beograd) 28.3:653–663; DOI: 10.2298/FID1703653S. BOOK SYMPOSIUM: Filozofia i Društvo/Philosophy and Society (Beograd) 30.2 (2019):197–320; Author’s Introduction & responses to comments by: Jovan Babiæ, Bojan Blagojeviæ, Igor Cvejiæ, Rastko Jovanov, Miloš Markoviæ, Olga Nikoliæ, Slavenko Šljukiæ. REVIEWS: Kant-Studien 110,4 (2019) (M. Pluder), DOI: 10.1515/kant-2019-4008; Kantian Review 23.3 (2018): 491–496 (F. Rauscher); Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (OnLine), 2016.07.19 (R. McCarty). 2 ward behaviour and physiological needs; basic principles of justice are artificial because solving those problems does not require appeal to moral realism (nor to moral anti-realism). Instead, moral cognitivism is preserved by identifying sufficient justifying reasons, which can be addressed to all parties, for the minimum sufficient legitimate principles and institutions required to provide and protect basic forms of social coördination (including verbal behaviour). Hume first develops this kind of constructivism for basic property rights and for government. Kant greatly refines Hume’s construction of justice within his Critical theory of justice, which undergirds and augments the core strategy of Hume’s innovative constructivism. Hume’s and Kant’s constructivism avoids the conventionalist and relativist tendencies latent if not explicit in contemporary forms of moral constructivism. 6. Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004a (softcover & e-book: 2009).4 (x + 299 pp.) This is the first detailed study of Kant’s method of ‘transcendental reflection’ and its use in the Critique of Pure Reason to identify our basic human cognitive capacities, and to justify Kant’s transcendental proofs of the necessary a priori conditions for the possibility of self-conscious human experience. Exacting internal critique of Kant’s analysis shows that if we take Kant’s project seriously in its own terms, the result is not transcendental idealism but (critical commonsense) realism regarding physical objects. This study examines neglected topics – Kant’s analyses of the transcendental affinity of the sensory manifold, the ‘lifelessness of matter’, fallibilism, the semantics of cognitive reference, four externalist aspects of Kant’s views, and the importance of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations for the Critique of Pure Reason – which illuminate Kant’s enterprise in new and valuable ways, addressed to philosophers interested in Kant’s theoretical philosophy or in contemporary epistemology. 7. Hegel’s Epistemology: A Philosophical Introduction to the PHENOMENOLOGY OF SPIRIT. Cambridge, Mass.: Hackett Publishing Co., 2003a.5 (xvi + 146 pp.) 4 BOOK SYMPOSIUM on K.R. Westphal, Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism’, Dialogue 46 (2007):709–50; comments by William HARPER (University of Western Ontario) and Rolf GEORGE (University of Waterloo), with replies by the author. (Replies to further criticisms in Westphal 2022a.) REVIEW ARTICLES: M. Wille, „Die transzendentale Wende Heute. Zur Gegenwärtigen Auseinandersetzung mir Kants Erkennthistheorie“, Zeitschrift für ung 65,1 (2009):122–141; J. Morgan, ‘An Alternative Argument for transcendental realism based on an immanent critique of Kant’, Journal of Critical Realism 4.2 (2005): 435–460; T. Kannisto, ‘Three Problems in Westphal’s Transcendental Proof of Realism’, Kant-Studien 101.2 (2010):227–246. REVIEWS: Journal of the History of Philosophy 44.4 (2006):665–666 (B. Look); British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14.1 (2006):179–182 (L. Allais); Kantian Review 11.1 (2006):127–30 (B. Hall); International Philosophical Quarterly 46.3 (2006):371–372 (M. Rohlf); Philosophy in Review 26.4 (2006):308–310 (S. Stapleford); The Review of Metaphysics 61.1 (2007):166–167; (M. Miles); Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2006.02.03 (B. Sassen); Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 60.4 (2007):367–371 (M. Wille); The Review of Metaphysics 61.1 (2007):166–167 (M. Miles); Philosophy & Phenomenological Research 76.3 (2008):740–745 (G. Dicker); Kant-Studien 100.3 (2009):382–385 (D. Schulting). 5 • ‘A reader-friendly, yet philosophically sharp and textually reliable introduction to one of the classics of Western philosophy. Westphal shows why the dramatic, quasi-historical, structure of Hegel’s work is not accidental to it, but is rather required by the reflective, self-critical, nature of judgment that Hegel assumes from the beginning. The book will be of interest to readers who approach Hegel with analytical as well as phenomenological preconceptions, and of use (though for different reasons) to undergraduates and graduate students alike’ – George DI GIOVANNI (McGill U.); • ‘Westphal argues that epistemological realism is compatible with a social and historical constructivism, and that Hegel shows us how a self-critical community of human knowers can achieve (and reflectively appreciate) knowledge of the world around them and their place in it. Almost 200 years ago Hegel had the kind of epistemology we now know we need! I hope this book 3 8. Hegel, Hume und die Identität wahrnehmbarer Dinge. Historisch-kritische Analyse zum Kapitel „Wahrnehmung“ in der Phänomenologie von 1807. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1998a. (xii + 166 pp.; Philosophische Abhandlungen 72.) Title: ‘Hegel, Hume & the Identity of Perceptible Things’. A comprehensive reconstruction and evaluation of Hegel’s chapter, „Wahrnehmung“ (‘Perception’; Phenomenology of Spirit, Ch. 2); shows that Hegel develops a sophisticated, cogent internal critique of Hume’s concept-empiricism in ‘Of Scepticism with Regard to the Senses’ (Treatise, 1.4.2).6 9. Hegel’s Epistemological Realism: A Study of the Aim and Method of Hegel’s PHENOMENOLOGY OF SPIRIT. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989a. (xiv + 309 pp.) (Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy 43, Keith Lehrer, ed.)7 DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-2342-3 Critically reconstructs, assesses and defends Hegel’s epistemological aims and method in close consideration of Sextus Empiricus, Descartes, Kant, Carnap & Alston. (Extensively revised successor submitted for publication.) Editor, thematic volumes : 10. with Mark Addis, eds., ‘The Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers’, special issue of SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy 24.1 (2023); contributors: Harry BRIGHOUSE, Randall CURREN, John GINGELL, A. Pablo IANNONE, Christopher WINCH, Naomi ZACK. 11. with Marina F. BYKOVA, eds., 2020b. The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. London, Palgrave/Macmillan (Springer Nature). (28 original, substantial chapters by leading international experts covering all aspects of Hegel’s philosophy; LII + 602 pp.)8 12. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7 with Mark Addis, eds., ‘The Crisis in Philosophy’, special issue of SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy 20.2 (2019); contributors: Susan HAACK, Ýlhan ÝNAN, Phila Mfundo MSIMANG, Paolo PARRINI; https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/sats/20/2/html. L will put Hegel back into the canon of epistemology’ – Willem DE VRIES (U. New Hampshire); • ‘Philosophically, the most satisfying and sophisticated account of the Phenomenology yet’ – Frederick BEISER (Syracuse U.); • ‘For philosophers interested in reading across the Continental/Analytic divide, this book opens new facets of Hegel’s philosophy’ – Donn WELTON (SUNY Stony Brook); • ‘Anyone seriously interested in epistemology, and especially anyone who doubts Hegel’s importance for contemporary epistemology, should read Ken Westphal’s elegant and insightful book’ – Joseph ROUSE (Wesleyan U.). REVIEWS: Continental Philosophy Review 37.3 (2004):367–381 (J. McCumber), the author replies: Continental Philosophy Review 37.4 (2004):495–503; The Owl of Minerva 38.1–2 (2006–07):151–158 (S. Jenkins); HegelStudien 39/40 (2004–05):196–8 (M.J. Saman). 6 REVIEWS: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 53.3 (1999):468–72 (R. Iseli); Hegel-Studien 35 (2000):154–60 (D. Heidemann); Theologie und Philosophie 75.1 (2000):122–24 (G. Sans); Tijdschrift voor Filosofie (1998):171–72 (L. De Vos); Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 51.4 (1998):352–56 (Chr. Halbig); also see: Joachim Hagner, ‘Die Wahrnehmung; oder das Ding, und die Täuschung’, in: D. Köhler & O. Pöggeler, eds., G. W. F. Hegel, Phänomenologie des Geistes (Klassiker Auslegen 16; Berlin: Akademie, 1998), 53–88. 7 REVIEWS: The Review of Metaphysics 45.1 (1991):157–58 (D. Berthold-Bond); Aquinas 33.3 (1990):685–86 (P. Marrone); Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 22.1 (1991):94–95 (D. Lamb); Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22.4 (1992):512–34 (H.S. Harris); Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52.1 (1992):177–202 (‘Recent Work on Hegel’, K. Ameriks); Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 27/28 (1993):56–58 (R. Stern); The Owl of Minerva 26.1 (1994):80–86 (W. Ludwig). 8 Phenomenological Reviews 22.09.2020 (Robb Dunphy): https://reviews.ophen.org/tag/sittlichkeit/?lang=es 4 13. Realism, Science & Pragmatism. New York & London: Routledge, 2014a.R (v + 320 pp.; series: Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy 58; softcover 2017.)9 Contributors: Douglas ANDERSON, Laurent CESALLI, Jaakko HINTIKKA, Lauri JÄRVILEHTO, Antti KESKINEN, Jonathan KNOWLES, Heikki A. KOVALAINEN, Dermot MORAN, Ilkka NIINILUOTO, Mika PERÄLÄ, Sami PIHLSTRÖM, Panu RAATIKAINEN, Eirik Julius RISBERG, Peter SWIRSKI and Kenneth R. WESTPHAL. (14 original essays examining systematically and historically a broad range of views and issues regarding realism about physical objects, their characteristics and relations, in 3 Parts: Realism Contextualized; Scientific Realism; Pragmatism and Realism. 3 very positive readers’ http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9781138018822/ reports.) 14. The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009a. (xvii + 325 pp.; hardback, softcover, e-book)10 The first collective critical commentary on the whole of Hegel’s Phenomenology; contributors: Frederick C. BEISER, Marina BYKOVA, Franco CHIEREGHIN, Allegra DELAURENTIIS, George DI GIOVANNI, Cinzia FERRINI, David C. HOY, Jocelyn HOY, Frederick NEUHOUSER, Terry PINKARD, Jürgen STOLZENBERG and Kenneth R. WESTPHAL. 15. With John SHOOK: William CALDWELL, Pragmatism and Idealism – and Responses and Reviews. Series: Early Critics of Pragmatism; Bristol: Thoemmes, 2001a. Co-author of critical introduction, vii–xix. 16. Pragmatism, Reason & Norms: A Realistic Assessment. New York: Fordham University Press, 1998b. (Series: Studies in American Philosophy, Vincent Colapietro, ed.) (xiv + 353 pp.)11 Contributors: William P. ALSTON, Thomas F. GREEN, William H. HAY, Matthias KETTNER, Stanley L. PAULSON, Martin PERLMUTTER, Nicolas RESCHER, Michael ROOT, Marcus G. SINGER, James E. TILES, James D. WALLACE and Kenneth R. WESTPHAL. 9 WORKSHOP proceedings on this volume: Cinzia FERRINI, guest ed., 2015, ‘Idealism, Pragmatism and Realism: A Real Dialogue on Historical Aspects of a Contemporary Problem’, with contributions by Cinzia FERRINI, K.R. WESTPHAL, Paolo PARRINI and audience questions with replies; special issue of: Esercizi https://www.openstarts.units.it/handle/10077/11908 Filosofici (Trieste) 10.1, Open Access: REVIEWS, NOTICES: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93.3 (2015):629–630 (G. O’Hair). 10 FROM REVIEWS: • ‘This collection of essay is an invaluable guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit for graduate students and Hegel Scholars. As well as being a lucid and detailed commentary on the entire of the Phenomenology of 1807, it also offers original contributions, which on certain occasions challenge traditional interpretations or the received view’. – Evangelia Sembou (The Owl of Minerva, 2012). • ‘This collection reunites the leading experts on Hegel’s philosophy who systematically address key issues in the notoriously difficult Phenomenology of Spirit. In every chapter the authors accompany the unfolding of Hegel’s argument and guide the reader through the intricacies of dialectical transitions’. – CHOICE (2009). • ‘A very impressive collection of essays by some of the most acute readers working on Hegel today. … The essays in this volume provide many accessible points of entry into Hegel’s thought. Scholars and teachers of Hegel’s most rewarding and perplexing work should be grateful’. – Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2009). REVIEWS, NOTICES: P. Giladi, Hegel Bulletin 36.1 (2015):111–5; E. Sembou, Owl of Minerva 43.1–2 (2011– 12):193–202; C. Melica, Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 90.3 (2011):703–706; M. Suhr, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93.1 (2011):114–120; J-C Merle, Archives de Philosophie 74.4 (2011):668–9; M.V. Marder, Choice (Aug. 2009): ‘Recommended’; D. Moyer, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2009.12.10); J.-L. Vieillard-Baron, Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger 200.2 (2010):282. 11 ‘Pragmatism, Reason, & Norms is a fine collection of essays published in honor of the work of the American philosopher Frederick L. Will. The publication of this volume is to be applauded. … Pragmatism, Reason, & Norms is well worth reading, especially for those who are interested in what pragmatism can contribute to contemporary moral theory’. – C. De Waal (International Studies in Philosophy 36.1 (2004):356–358). 5 17. An Introduction to Hegel’s Logic, by Justus HARTNACK; Lars Aagaard-Mogensen, tr. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1998. 18. Pragmatism & Realism, by Frederick L. WILL. Foreword by Alasdair MACINTYRE; edited, with critical introduction (xiii–lxi ), by K.R. Westphal. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997a. (lxi + 205 pp.; Series: Studies in Epistemology and Cognitive Theory, Paul Moser, ed.; Hardback, softcover, eBook)12 An integrated set of 9 essays which develop an original pragmatic account of cognitive and practical norms which shows, inter alia, that a social account of knowledge is consistent with realism. Translations: 19. With Frederick RAUSCHER, I. Kant, Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016;I (softcover: 2020; xxiv + 431 pp.). For this volume I translated and annotated Kant’s drafts on theory of justice and excerpts from Kant’s drafts of the Preface and Introduction to the Doctrine of Virtue regarding his distinction between justice and virtue; 50,000 words; ca. 50% of the volume.) Klein, Hans-Dieter, 2023. ‘Of Eternal Peace’. In: M.F. Bykova, ed., The History of Philosophy as Philosophy: The Russian Vocation of Nelly V. Motroshilova (Leiden: Brill, 2023). Hegel, G.W.F., ‘The Beginning of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: Introduction (Einleitung) and Consciousness: Sense Certainty, Perception, Force & Understanding’. Translated and annotated by K.R. Westphal. The Owl of Minerva 47.1 (2015–16):1–67;I DOI: 10.5840/owl201632916. Hegel, G.W.F., 1807. ‘Community as the Basis of Free Individual Action’. Translation and annotation of excerpts from Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, in: M. Daly, ed., Communitarianism (Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth, 1994), 36–40.I Bouterwek, Friedrich, 1797, 1799. Reviews of I. Kant, Metaphysical Foundations of Justice. K.R. Westphal, ed. & tr.. Kant Studies Online (2014):240–261;R search ‘Bouterwek’: www.kantstudiesonline.net Schulze, Gottlob Ernst (anon.), 1803. ‘Aphorisms on the Absolute’. K.R. Westphal, ed. & tr., with James Sares & Caleb Faul, trs., Owl of Minerva 51.1–2 (2020):1–34. DOI: 10.5840/owl202052528 Arndt, Andreas, 2020. ‘Hegel’s Philosophy of World History’, K.R. Westphal & Anna Moent12 Pragmatism and Realism ‘is an indispensable aid to self-understanding for American philosophers of all persuasions’. – James TILES, University of Hawai'i at Manoa. Pragmatism and Realism ‘is a stimulating, illuminating and rewarding work – original, important, and profound ... [it] manifests both a superior mind and great integrity and might well prove to be a philosophical classic’. – Marcus George SINGER, University of Wisconsin – Madison. JOINT REVIEWS, DISCUSSIONS of Pragmatism and Realism and Pragmatism, Reason, and Norms: S. Pihlström, ‘Pragmatic Realism and Transcendental Conditions’, Journal of Speculative Philosophy 12.4 (1998):301–11; J. Capps, ‘The Pragmatism of Frederick L. Will’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35.3 (1999):475–99; J.-C. Wolf, ‘Review’ of Frederick L. Will, Pragmatism, and Realism (1997), Kenneth R. Westphal, ed., Pragmatism, Reason and Norms (1998), in: Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 47.3 (2000):523–26; Peter Hare, ‘Classical Pragmatism, Recent Naturalistic Theories of Representation, and Pragmatic Realism’, in: P. Weingartner, G. Schurz & G. Dorn, eds., The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy (Vienna: HölderPichler-Tempsky, 1998), 58–65; also see: Joseph Margolis, ‘The Benign Antinomy of a Constructive Realism’, in: J. Shook, ed., Pragmatic Realism and Naturalism (Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2003), 29–42. REVIEW of Pragmatism, Reason, and Norms : International Studies in Philosophy 36.1 (2004):356–8 (C. De Waal). 6 mann, trs.. In: M.F. Bykova & K.R. Westphal, eds., The Palgrave Hegel Handbook (London, Palgrave/Macmillan (Springer Nature)), 453–466. Motroshilova, Nelly, 2020. ‘Hegel’s History of Philosophy’, K.R. Westphal, with M.F. Bykova, trs.. In: M.F. Bykova & K.R. Westphal, eds., The Palgrave Hegel Handbook (London, Palgrave/Macmillan (Springer Nature)), 485–518. Wolff, Michael, 2020. ‘Levels of Reality or Development? Hegel’s Realphilosophie and Philosophy of the Sciences’. In: M.F. Bykova & K.R. Westphal, eds., The Palgrave Hegel Handbook (London, Palgrave/Macmillan (Springer Nature)), 201–218. Wolff, Michael, 2017. ‘How Precise is Kant’s Table of Judgments?’. In: J. O’SHEA, ed., Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 83–105.I Wolff, Michael, 1999. ‘On Hegel’s Doctrine of Contradiction’. K.R. Westphal & Erin Flynn, trs.. Owl of Minerva 31.1:1–22. Stolzenberg, Jürgen, 2009. ‘Hegel’s Critique of the Enlightenment in “The struggle of the Enlightenment with Superstition”’; Willem deVries, Kenneth Caskie & K.R. Westphal, trs. In: K.R. Westphal, ed., The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (London, Blackwell), 190–208. ARTICLES: Formally REFEREED publications indicated by a superscript ‘R’ at the end of the citation; INVITED publications (all subject to editorial review) are indicated by ‘I’; Invited essays subject to external review are indicated by both superscripts. ABSTRACTS of my articles appear in The Philosopher’s Index, PhilPapers.org and, organised by topic areas, on my website. 2023 1. Âåñòôàëü Ê. Îòâåò íà âîïðîñ: ×òî òàêîå «êðèòè÷åñêàÿ ôèëîñîôèÿ» Êàíòà? Ðåð. ñ àíãë. À.Ã. Æàâîðîíêîâà; Voprosy Filosofii (2023a), issue 6:176–193. Russian translation by Alexey Zhavoronkov of Westphal (2020d; What IS Kant’s Critical Philosophy?), including author’s revisions. DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2023-6-176-193 2. „Die zweifache Stoßrichtung der Hegelschen Metakritik in der Phänomenologie des Geistes (1807).“ Jahrbuch für Hegelforschung 22 (2023b):135–168. (Original version of Westphal 2020f.) 3. „Wie Hegels kognitive Semantik Newtons ‚Regel IV der Experimentalphilosophie‘ untermauert und damit van Fraassens ‚konstruktiven Empirismus‘ unterminiert“, Èñòîðèêî-ôèëîñîôñêèé åæåãîäíèê 2023, T. 38 (Ìîñêâà, Àêâèëîí), Ñ. 36–99/ Jahrbuch für Geschichte der Philosophie 2023, Bd. 38, S. 36–99 [Moskau, Àêâèëîí] (2023c), Open Access. DOI: 10.21146/0134-8655-2023-38-36-99 https://ife.iphras.ru/article/view/9560/4789 4. ‘Autonomy, Enlightenment, Justice, Peace – & the Precarities of Reasoning Publically’. Conatus 8.2 (2023d):725–758; Special Issue: War Ethics, Jovan BABIÆ, guest ed.; Open Access, DOI: 10.12681/cjp.35297. 5. ‘Educational Responsibilities of Philosophers – SATS Special Issue: Introduction’. SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy 24.1 (2023e):1–12. DOI: 10.1515/sats-2023-0007 6. ‘The Analytic of Principles’. In: M. TIMMONS & S. BAIASU, eds., The Kantian Mind (New York & London: Routledge, 2023f), 94–107.I DOI: 10.4324/9781003406617-12 7 2022 7. ‘Gilligan, Kohlberg & 20th-Century (C.E.) Moral Theory: Does Anglophone Ethics Rest on a Mistake?’ Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 30 (2022a):199–234. 8. „Wie beweist Kant die »Realität« unseres äusseren Sinnes?“ In: G. MOTTA, D. SCHULTING & U. THIEL, Hgg., Kants transzendentale Deduktion und seine Apperzeptionstheorie: Neue Interpretationen/Kant’s Transcendental Deduction and his Theory of Apperception: New Interpretations (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2022b), 525–569.R (Further develops the constructive analysis in Westphal (2004a), with replies to critics; Title: ‘How does Kant Prove the “Reality” of our Outer Sense?’.) DOI: 10.1515/9783110732603-022 9. ‘Soru Cevaplandý: Kant’ýn “Eleºtirel Felsefesi” Nedir? Kant Çalaºmalarý Dergisi 1 (2022c):9–25. (Turkish translation of Westphal (2020c); ‘Answer to the Question, what is Kant’s ‘Critical Philosophy’?) 10. “‘A Republic, If You Can Keep It’.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (SERRC ; 2471-9560) 11.7 (2022d):22–32; https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-6Zq. ISSN: 2021 11. „Was heißt es, sich in der kritischen Philosophie zu orientieren? Heterodoxe hermeneutische Briefe zur Beförderung der Humanität“. In: Werner FLACH & Christian KRIJNEN, Kant und Hegel über Freiheit. Mit Diskussionsbeiträgen von Martin Bunte, Jakub Kloc-Konko³owicz, Hernán Pringe, Jacco Verburgt, Kenneth R. Westphal und Manfred Wetzel (Leiden: Brill, 2021b; series: Critical Studies in German Idealism), 201–216; DOI: 10.1163/9789004470088_008. 12. „Aufklärung, Vernunft und Universalismus“. Aus dem Englischen übersetzt von Jean-Christophe Merle. In: C.F. von VILLIEZ und J.-C. MERLE, Hgg., Zwischen Rechten und Pflichten – Kants ›Metaphysik der Sitten‹ (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2021c), 31–55; DOI: 10.1515/978311053 7215-004. (Title: ‘Enlightenment, Reason and Universalism’.) 13. ‘Introduction: Paolo Parrini & Relative A Priori Principles’. Philosophical Inquiries (Firenze) 9,1 (2021d):59–77. Critical introduction to two related papers by Paolo Parrini, published in this same issue now in English: ‘Analyticity and Epistemological Holism: Prague Alternatives’ (2006), and ‘Quine on Analyticity and Holism. A critical appraisal in dialogue with Sandro Nannini’ (79–93, 95–112, resp.). 2020 14. „Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist kritische Philosophie?“ In: D. SIMMERMACHER & A. KRAUSE, Hgg., Denken und Handeln. Perspektiven der praktischen Philosophie und der Sprachphilosophie – Festschrift für Matthias Kaufmann (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2020d), 291–305. 15. ‘Universal Moral Principles & Mother Wit, or: Étienne Tempier & Cold War Rationality’. In: M. KAUFMANN, J. THOMPSON, M. MASSA & S. BRANDT, Hgg., Regelfolgen, Regelschaffen, Regeländern – die Herausforderung für Auto-Nomie und Universalismus durch Ludwig Wittgenstein, Martin Heidegger und Carl Schmitt (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2020e), 313–356.I (16,200 words) 16. ‘Kant, Hegel & our Fate as Zoôn Politikon’. In: J. GLEDHILL & S. STEIN, eds., Hegel and Contemporary Practical Philosophy: Beyond Kantian Constructivism (Routledge 2020f), 181–207. (12,100 words); ISBN : 13 9780815383734.13 • ‘Beyond Kantian Constructivism is the first attempt to put recent interpretations of Hegel into dialogue with the tradition of Kantian constructivism – an astonishing gap in the literature, which has now been filled by this important and timely collection, which effectively shows how Hegel’s idealism provides the 17. ‘Kant, Hegel & the Historicity of Pure Reason’. In: M.F. BYKOVA & K.R. WESTPHAL, eds., The Palgrave Hegel Handbook (London: Palgrave/Macmillan (Springer Nature), 2020g), 45–64. 18. ‘Individuality & Human Sociality: Individualism & our Human Zoôn Politikon’. In: M.F. BYKOVA & K.R. WESTPHAL, eds., The Palgrave Hegel Handbook (London, Palgrave Macmillan (Springer Nature), 2020h), 133–148. 19. ‘Causality, Natural Systems & Hegel’s Organicism’. In: M.F BYKOVA & K.R. WESTPHAL, eds., The Palgrave Hegel Handbook (London, Palgrave Macmillan (Springer Nature), 2020i), 219–240. 2019 20. ‘Cosmopolitanism without Commensurability: Why Incommensurable Values are Worthless’. In: Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 27 (2019a):243–266; Gedächtnisschrift für Joachim Hruschka ( †10.12.2017). 21. ‘Kant’s Two Models of Human Actions’. In: ‘Contemporary Ethics & Politics: Kantian Resonances’, special issue of Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75.1 (2019b):17–32.I 22. ‘Modern Moral Epistemology’. In: A. ZIMMERMAN, K. JONES & M. TIMMONS, eds., The Routledge Handbook on Moral Epistemology (New York & Oxford: Routledge, 2019c), 254–273.I 23. ‘Hegel’s Critique of Theoretical Spirit: Kant’s Functionalist Cognitive Psychology in Context’. In: M. BYKOVA, ed., Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019d), 57–80. 24. Book Symposium: K.R. Westphal, How Hume & Kant Reconstruct Natural Law. Filozofia i Društvo/ Philosophy and Society (Beograd) 30.2 (2019e):197–320; URL: http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid. Author’s Introduction + Replies (13,000 words total); to comments by: Jovan BABIÆ, Bojan BLAGOJEVIÆ, Igor CVEJIÆ, Rastko JOVANOV, Miloš MARKOVIÆ, Olga NIKOLIÆ, Slavenko ŠLJUKIÆ. 25. With Mark Addis, ‘Philosophy and its Plight’. Introduction to the special issue, The Crisis in Philosophy. SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy 20.2:79–87; DOI: 10.1515/sats-2020-2005. 2018 26. ‘Epistemology, Cognitive (In)Capacities & Thought Experiments’. In: M.T. STUART, J.R. BROWN and Y. FEHIGE, eds., The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments (New York & London: Routledge, 2018b), 128–149.I conceptual resources to respond to the conceptual dichotomies of Kantian constructivism’. – Paolo Diego Bubbio, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Western Sydney University. • ‘Hegel and Contemporary Practical Philosophy is one impressive collection an impressive collection of contributions by the best English-speaking scholars of Hegel. It shows how Hegel’s practical philosophy clarifies the challenges at stake in contemporary discussions, for example between moral ‘constructivism’ and ‘realism’, which are enlightened by the introduction of the volume’. – Jean-François Kervégan, Professor of Philosophy, University of Paris. • ‘James GLEDHILL and Sebastian STEIN have produced a book that is not only a collection of excellent essays on Hegel and practical philosophy, but an excellent collection with a unifying focus on Kantian constructivism. It contains essays by prominent and by up-and-coming Hegel scholars, all of which are informed by relevant debates in analytic philosophy. It will henceforth be indispensable reading for anyone working on Hegel’s practical philosophy’. – Gordon Finlayson, Director, Centre of Social and Political Thought, University of Sussex. 9 27. „Naturrecht, Künstlichkeit & die Sozialontologie moralischer Grundnormen“. In: S. ZIMMERMANN & Chr. KRIJNEN, Hgg., Sozialontologie in der Perspektive des deutschen Idealismus. Ansätze, Rezeptionen, Probleme (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018c), 21–40;I, 14 DOI: 10.1515/9783110572735-003. 28. ‘Higher Education & Academic Administration: Current Crises Long Since Foretold’. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (SERRC) 7.1 (2018d):41–47; https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-3Tb. (Updated version on author’s website.) 2017 29. ‘Identifying & Justifying Moral Norms: Necessary Basics’. In: P. CAPPS & S.D. PATTINSON, eds., Ethical Rationalism and the Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017a), 37–53.I 30. ‘Kant’s Dynamical Principles: The Analogies of Experience’. In: J. O’SHEA, ed., Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017b), 184–204.I 31. ‘Kant, Causal Judgment & Locating the Purloined Letter’. S. MIGUENS & P. TUNHAS, guest eds., ‘Kant in Current Philosophy of Mind and Epistemology’, Con-Textos Kantianos 6 (2017c):42– 78; DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1092771. 32. ‘Scepticism, Transcendental Arguments & Transcendental Method’. Philosophy and Society/Filozofia i Društvo [Beograd] 28.1 (2017d):113–134; DOI: 10.2298/FID1701113W.I 33. ‘Empiricism, Pragmatic Realism & the A Priori in Mind and the World Order’. In: C. SACHS & P. OLEN, eds., Contemporary Perspectives on C.I. Lewis: Pragmatism in Transition (London: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature, 2017e), 169–198; DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52863-2_8.I 34. „Qualia, Gemütsphilosophie & Methodologie; oder Wie wird aristotelische Scientia zu cartesianischer Unfehlbarkeit? Zum heutigen Widerstreit des Naturalismus und Cartesianismus“. Zeitschrift für philosohische Forschung 71,4 (2017f):457–494.R 15 35. ‘How Kant Justifies Freedom of Agency without Transcendental Idealism’. European Journal of Philosophy 25.4 (2017g):1695–1717; DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12264.R 36. ‘Hegel, Natural Law & Moral Constructivism’. The Owl of Minerva 48.1 (2016–17h):1–44; DOI: author’s translation of Westphal (2016d), lead article of special issue, comments by Mark ALZNAUER, Jovan BABIÆ, William CONKLIN & Stuart TODDINGTON, with author’s replies (next item).I 10.5840/owl201752719; 37. ‘Hegel’s Natural Law Constructivism: Fundamentals of Republicanism’. The Owl of Minerva 48.1–2 (2016–17i):109–140; DOI: 10.5840/owl2017112924.I 38. ‘Hegel’s Natural Law Constructivism: Progressive in Principle & in Practice’. In: S. STEIN & T. BROOKS, eds., Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017j), 253–279.I 39. ‘The Centrality of Public Reason in Hegel’s Theory of Justice’. In: P.N. TURNER & G.F. GAUS, eds., Public Reason in Political Philosophy: Classic Sources and Contemporary Commentaries (New York: Routledge, 2017k), 330–353.I 14 Title: ‘Natural Law, Artifice and the Social Ontology of Basic Moral Norms’; volume title: Social Ontology: German Idealist Perspectives. 15 Title: ‘Qualia, Philosophy of Mindedness and Methodology, or: How did Aristotelian Scientia become Cartesian Infallibility? On the Contemporary Opposition between Naturalism and Cartesianism’. 10 40. ‘Hegel’s Justification of the Human Right to Non-Domination’. Filozofia i Društvo/Philosophy and Society (Beograd) 28.3 (2017l ):579–612; DOI: 10.2298/FID1703579W.I (Critical examination and defence of Hegel’s Critical justification of Kant’s sole innate right to freedom and its resolutely (small ‘r’) republican implications.) 2016 41. ‘Back to the 3 R’s: Rights, Responsibilities & Reasoning’. SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy 17.1 (2016b):21–60; R DOI: 10.1515/sats-2016-0008. 42. ‘Enlightenment, Reason & Universalism: Kant’s Critical Insights’. In: M.F. BYKOVA, guest ed., Studies in East European Thought 68.2–3 (2016c):127–148; special double issue honouring Prof. Dr. Nelly MOTROSHILOVA.I (Revised & extended version of Westphal 2016h); read-only link: http:// rdcu.be/mFgH ; DOI: 10.1007/s11212-016-9259-4. 43. ‘Kant, Aristotle & our Fidelity to Reason’. In: S. BAIASU & R. DEMIREY, guest eds., ‘The ethical and the juridical in Kant’, special issue of Studi Kantiani 29 (2016d):109–128.I, R 44. „Hegel, Naturrecht und Moralkonstruktivismus“. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 26 (2016e):451–483. 45. „Rousseaus Umbau des Naturrechts in Du contrat social “. In: M. KAUFMANN & J. RENZIKOWSKI, Hgg., Freiheit als Rechtsbegriff (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2016f), 213–226. (German version of Westphal 2013b.)I 46. Âåñòôàëü Ê.Ð. “Ìîðàëüíûé êîíñòðóêòèâèçì, òåîðèÿ îáùåñòâåííîãî äîãîâîðà è îñíîâíûå îáÿçàííîñòè: Êàíò ïðîòèâ Ãîòüå.” Èñòîðèêî-ôèëîñîôñêèé åæåãîäíèê 2016. Ìîñêâà: Àêâèëîí, 2016g. Ñ. 242–268.I • Kenneth R. Westphal, ‘Moral Constructivism, Social Contract Theory and Basic Duties: Kant contra Gauthier’ (translated from German of Westphal 2014c into Russian by Alexander Tchikin), History of Philosophy Yearbook 2016 (Moscow: Akvilon Press, 2016g), 242–268.I 47. ‘Mind, Language & Behaviour: Kant’s Critical Cautions contra Contemporary Internalism & Causal Naturalism’. In: S. BABÜR, ed., Felsefede Yöntem/Method in Philosophy, special issue of Yeditepe’ de Felsefe/Philosophy at Yeditepe 10 (Ýstanbul: Yeditepe Üniversitesi Press, 2016h), 102–149.I, R 48. ‘Cognitive Psychology, Intelligence & the Realisation of the Concept in Hegel’s Anti-Cartesian Epistemology’. In: S. HERRMANN-SINAI & L. ZIGLIOLI eds., Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology (New York & London: Routledge, 2016i), 191–213.I, R 49. ‘Oœwiecenie, rozum i uniwersalizm: intuicje krytyczne Kanta’. Polish translation (of the first, briefer version of Westphal 2016c) by J. Miklaszewska in: J. MIKLASZEWSKA & A. TOMASZEWSKA, eds., Filozofia oœwiecenia: religia, rewolucja, kosmopolityzm (Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagielloñskiego, 2016j), 456–484.I 2015 50. ‘Conventionalism & the Impoverishment of the Space of Reasons: Carnap, Quine & Sellars’. Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 3.8 (2015a):1–66;R DOI: 10.15173/jhap.v3i8.42. 51. ‘Hegel’s Pragmatic Critique & Reconstruction of Kant’s System of Principles in the 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit’. In: N. GASCOIGNE, guest ed., Hegel and Pragmatism; Hegel Bulletin 36.2 11 (2015b; CUP):159–183; R DOI: 10.1017/hgl.2015.16. 52. ‘Hegel’s Pragmatic Critique & Reconstruction of Kant’s System of Principles in the Logic & Encyclopaedia’. Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 54.2 (2015c): 333–369.R DOI: 10.1017/S0012217315000219. 53. ‘Causal Realism & the Limits of Empiricism: Some Unexpected Insights from Hegel’. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5.2 (2015d):281–317.R 54. „Kant: Vernunftkritik, Konstruktivismus und Besitzrecht“. In: A. TRAVESONNI-GOMEZ and J.-C. MERLE, eds., Kant’s Theory of Law (Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (2015e), Beiheft 143), 57–100.I 55. ‘Some Observations on Realism, Science & Pragmatism’. Esercizi Filosofici (Trieste) 10.1 (2015f): 17–40. https://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/handle/10077/11910 56. ‘Some Replies to Professor PARRINI, to Students & to Members of the Audience’. Esercizi Filosofici (Trieste) 10.1 (2015g):63–79. https://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/handle/10077/11912. 2014 57. ‘Hegel’s Semantics of Singular Cognitive Reference, Newton’s Methodological Rule Four & Scientific Realism Today’. Philosophical Inquiries 2.1 (2014b):9–65.I (Publisher: ETS, Pisa; substantial further development of Westphal 2013c; http://philinq.it/index.php/philinq/article/view/86/44) 58. „Moralkonstruktivismus, Vertragstheorie & Grundpflichten: Kant contra Gauthier“. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 22 (2014c):545–563. 59. ‘Cognitive Semantics & Newton’s Rule 4 of Experimental Philosophy: Scientific Realism without Empiricism’.R In: K.R. Westphal, ed., Realism, Science and Pragmatism (New York & London: Routledge, 2014d), 173–199 (Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy 58). 60. „Wie Kants kognitve Semantik Newtons Regel IV der Experimentalphilosophie untermauert & van Fraassens konstruktiven Empirismus entkräftet.“ In: M. EGGER, ed., Philosophie nach Kant. Festschrift für Manfred Baum (Berlin: deGruyter, 2014e), 55–69.I (Excerpt from Westphal (2011c), translated by the author and M. Kettner.) 61. ‘Rational Justification & Mutual Recognition in Substantive Domains’. Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 53.1 (2014f):57–96.R (Substantial further development of Westphal 2011b); DOI: 10.1017/S0012217313000796. 62. ‘Enlightenment Fundamentals: Rights, Responsibilities & Republicanism’. Diametros 40 (2014g): 176–200.I (Special issue: ‘The Radical Enlightenment’); DOI: 10.13153/diam.40.2014.635. 63. „Autonomie und Freiheit verkörperter Personen. Bemerkungen zu Hegel und den heutigen Lebenswissenschaften“. In: K. SEELMANN und B. ZABEL, Hgg., Autonomie und Normativität. Zu Hegels Rechtsphilosophie (Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck), 2014h), 307–326.I (Original version of next item.)16 64. ‘Autonomy, Freedom & Embodiment: Hegel’s Critique of Contemporary Biologism’. The Hegel Bulletin [CUP] 35.1 (2014i):56–83.R (Author’s tr. previous item); DOI: 10.1017/hgl.2014.4. 16 Volume title: ‘Normativity and Institutions: Hegel’s Concept of Autonomy and the Challenges of the Life Sciences’. 12 65. ‘Finitude, Rational Justification & Mutual Recognition’. In: C. KRIJNEN, ed., Recognition – German Idealism as an Ongoing Challenge (Leiden: Brill, 2014j), 235–251.I 66. ‘Ôèëîñîôèÿ, åå èñòîðèÿ è ñèñòåìàòè÷åñêîå ìûøëåíèå: Íåêîòîðûå íàáëþäåíèÿ íàä ñîâðåìåííîé ôèëîñîôèåé’. Èñòîðèêî-ôèëîñîôñêèé åæåãîäíèê'2013 (Ìîñêâà: Êàíîí+– ÐÎÎÈ Ðåàáèëèòàöèÿ, 2014k), C. 5–28.I, 17 67. ‘Ôèëîñîôèÿ, åå èñòîðèÿ è ñèñòåìàòè÷åñêîå ìûøëåíèå: Íåêîòîðûå íàáëþäåíèÿ íàä ñîâðåìåííîé ôèëîñîôèåé’. // Èñòîðèÿ ôèëîñîôèè: âûçîâû XXI âåêà / Îòâ. ðåä. Í.Â. Ìîòðîøèëîâà. (Ìîñêâà: Êàíîí+ÐÎÎÈ Ðåàáèëèòàöèÿ, 2014l). Ñ. 168–182. (Excerpt of previous item, published as a comment.)I, 18 2013 68. ‘Hume, Empiricism & the Generality of Thought’. Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 52.2 (2013a):233–270;R DOI: 10.1017/S0012217313000279. 69. ‘Natural Law, Social Contract & Moral Objectivity: Rousseau’s Natural Law Constructivism’. Jurisprudence 4.1 (2013b):48–75;R DOI: 10.5235/20403313.4.1.48. 70. ‘Kant’s Cognitive Semantics, Newton’s Rule Four of Natural Philosophy & Scientific Realism Today’. In: Kant and Contemporary Theory of Knowledge, Kant Yearbook 5 (2013c):127–168.I (Much revised and expanded version of Westphal 2011c); DOI: 10.1515/kantyb.2013.5.1.127. 71. ‘Substantive Philosophy, Infallibilism & the Critique of Metaphysics: Hegel & the Historicity of Philosophical Reason’. In: L. HERZOG, ed., Hegel’s Thought in Europe: Currents, Cross-Currents and Undercurrents (Baisingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2013d), 192–220.I, R 2012 72. ‘Norm Acquisition, Rational Judgment & Moral Particularism’. Theory & Research in Education 10.1 (2012a):3–25.R DOI: 10.1177/1477878512437477. 73. „Die positive Verteidigung Kants der Urteils- und Handlungsfreiheit, und zwar ohne transzendentalen Idealismus“. In: M. BRANDHORST, A. HAHMANN und B. LUDWIG, Hgg., Sind wir Bürger zweier Welten? Freiheit und moralische Verantwortung im transzendentalen Idealismus (Kant-Forschungen 20; Hamburg: Meiner, 2012b), 259–277.I 19 74. ‘Hegel’ [Normative Justification in Hegel’s Social Theory of Morality]. In: T. ANGIER, ed., Ethics: Key Thinkers (London: Continuum, 2012c20), 153–174.I (7,500 word entry.) 17 Title: ‘Philosophy, History and Systematic Thinking: Some Observations on Philosophy Today’; volume: History of Philosophy Yearbook – 2013, Moscow: Kanon+. 18 Volume title: N.V. Motroshilova, ed., History of Philosophy: The Challenges of the 21stCentury (Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiia, 2014g), 168–182. 19 Title: ‘Kant’s Positive Defence of Freedom of Judgment and Action, sans Transcendental Idealism’; in: ‘Are We Citizens of Two Worlds? Freedom and Moral Responsibility in Transcendental Idealism’. 20 ‘An outstanding and wide-ranging introduction to many of the key figures in the history of western ethics from Plato until the present day. Highly recommended for anyone with a serious interest in moral philosophy and its development’. – Prof. Roger Crisp, Uehiro Fellow & Tutor, St Anne’s College, Oxford. 13 2011 75. ‘Self-Consciousness, Anti-Cartesianism & Cognitive Semantics in Hegel’s 1807 Phenomenology’. In: S. HOULGATE and M. BAUR, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Hegel (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011a), 68–90.I DOI: 10.1002/9781444397161.ch3. 76. „Urteilskraft, gegenseitige Anerkennung & rationale Rechtfertigung“. In: H.-D. KLEIN, Hg., Ethik als prima philosophia? (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2011b), 171–193.I (English counterpart: 2013d.)21 77. ‘Kant’s Cognitive Semantics, Newton’s Rule Four of Philosophy & Scientific Realism’. In: Special Issue on Kant and Hegel, Hegel Bulletin 32.1–2 (2011c):27–49.I (CUP; published on line: 22 April 2013); DOI: 10.1017/S026352320000015X. 78. ‘Kant’s [Moral] Constructivism & Rational Justification’. In: S. BAIASU, S. PIHLSTRÖM and H. WILLIAMS, eds., Politics and Metaphysics in Kant (Cardiff: Wales University Press, 2011d), 28– 46.I,R (North American distribution: University of Chicago Press.) 79. ‘“Êðèòèêà ÷èñòîãî ðàçóìà” Êàíòà è àíàëèòè÷åñêàÿ ôèëîñîôèÿ’. Voprosi filosofii 7 (2011e): 148–165.I, 22 80. ‘Analytic Philosophy & the Long Tail of Scientia: Hegel & the Historicity of Philosophy’. The Owl of Minerva 42.1–2 (2010/11f):1–18.R 2010 81. ‘From “Convention” to “Ethical Life”: Hume’s Theory of Justice in Post-Kantian Perspective’. The Journal of Moral Philosophy 7.1 (2010a):105–132.R (Slightly revised English version of Westphal 2005c.) DOI: 10.1163/174046809X12507600512291. 82. ‘Hegel, Russell & the Foundations of Philosophy’. In: A. NUZZO, ed., Hegel and the Analytical Tradition (New York: Continuum [now Bloomsbury], 2010b), 174–194.I (Revised, extended version of Westphal 2002c.) 83. ‘Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason & Analytic Philosophy’. In: P. GUYER, ed., Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010c), 401–430.I DOI: 84. 10.1017/CCOL9780521883863.018 ‹Ñóæäåíèå, âçàèìíîå ïðèçíàíèå è ðàöèîíàëüíîå îáîñíîâàíèå›. In: Í. Â. ÌÎÒÐÎØÈËÎÂÀ, ðåä, “Ôåíîìåíîëîãèÿ äóõà” Ãåãåëÿ â êîíòåêñòå ñîâðåìåííîãî ãåãåëåâåäå-íèÿ, îòâ (Ìîñêâà: «Êàíîí+» ÐÎÎÈ «Ðåàáèëèòàöèÿ», 2010d; ISBN 978-5-88373-154-6), C. 195–219.I (Original publication of Westphal (2009c) in Russian translation.)23 85. ‘Practical Reason: Categorical Imperative, Maxims, Laws’. In: W. DUDLEY & K. ENGELHARD, eds., Kant: Key Concepts (London: Acumen, 2010f), 103–119;I DOI: 10.1017/UPO9781844654758.007 86. ‘The Long Tail of Scientia & the Historicity of Philosophy’. In: N. MOTROSHILOVA, et al, eds., Ôèëîñîôèÿ â äèàëîãå êóëüòóð. Âñåìèðíûé äåíü ôèëîñîôèè (Ìîñêâà – Ñàíêò Ïåòåðáóðã, 16–19 íîÿá21 Title: ‘Judgment, Mutual Recognition & Rational Justification’. ‘Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy’; Russian trans. of Westphal (2010c), §§1–2, 4–5. 23 Title: ‘Mutual Recognition & Rational Justification in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit’. In: N. V. Motroshilova, ed., Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit in the Context of the Contemporary Hegel Scholarship (Moscow: Kanon+, 2010d), 195–219. 22 14 ðÿ 2009 ãîäà) (Ìîñêâà, Ïðîãðåññ – Òðàäèöèÿ, 2010g), 162–176.I, 24 2009 87. ‘Hegel’s Phenomenological Method & Analysis of Consciousness’. In: K.R. Westphal, ed., The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009b), 1–36. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/9781405131100 88. ‘Mutual Recognition & Rational Justification in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit’. Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 48.4 (2009c):753–799.R (Revised, extended English version of Westphal 2010d); DOI: 10.1017/S0012217309990412. 89. ‘Does Kant’s Opus Postumum Anticipate Hegel’s Absolute Idealism?’ In: E.-O. ONNASCH, ed., Kants Philosophie der Natur. Ihre Entwicklung bis zum Opus postumum und Nachwirkung (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2009d), 357–383.I 90. ‘Consciousness, Scepticism & the Critique of Categorial Concepts in Hegel’s 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit’. In: M. BYKOVA & M. SOLOPOVA, eds., Ñóùíîñòü è Ñëîâî. Ñáîðíèê íàó÷íûõ ñòàòåé ê þáèëåþ ïðîôåññîðà Í.Â.Ìîòðîøèëîâîé (Moscow: Phenomenology & Hermeneutics Press, 2009e), 357–376.I, 25 91. ‘Kant, Hegel & Determining Our Duties’. Reprint of Westphal (2005b) in: D. KNOWLES, ed., G.W.F. Hegel (series: T. Campbell, ed., International Library of Essays in the History of Social and Political Thought; Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009f), 337–356. 92. ‘Uma justificação kantiana da posse’. Portugese translation of ‘Kant’s Justification of Possession’ (Westphal 2002a) by A. Travessoni Gomes & G.M.P. Santos, in: A. TRAVESSONI, ed., Kant e o Direito (Belo Horizonte: Mandamentos, 2009g), 417–446.I 93. ‘Republicanismo, Despotismo e obediência à autoridade: a inadequação da teoria da divisão de poderes de Kant’. Portugese translation of ‘Republicanism, Despotism & Obedience to Authority: The Inadequacy of Kant’s Division of Powers’ (Westphal 1993c), by A. Travessoni Gomes & P.M. Nasser Cury, in: A. TRAVESSONI, ed., Kant e o Direito (Belo Horizonte: Mandamentos, 2009h), 487–516.I 2008 94. ‘Philosophizing about Nature: Hegel’s Philosophical Project’. In: F.C. BEISER, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008a), 281–310.I DOI: 10.1017/CCOL9780521831673.012. 95. ‘Force, Understanding & Ontology’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 57/58 (2008b):1–29.I 96. ‘Intelligenz & the Interpretation of Hegel’s Idealism: Some Hermeneutic Pointers’. The Owl of Minerva 39.1–2 (2007/08c):95–134.R 97. ‘Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell’. Rpt. of Westphal (2006a) in: J. LINDGAARD, ed., John McDowell: Experience, Norm and Nature (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008d), 124–151. I DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00226.x 24 Philosophy in the Dialogue of Cultures. World Philosophy Day (Moscow – St. Petersburg, November 16–19, 2009) (Moscow: Progress–Tradition, 2010g). 25 Volume title: Essence and Word. Festschrift for Professor N.V. Motroshilova.. 15 98. ‘Hegel’in Tinin Görüngübilimi’nde Karºilikli Onanma ve Ussal Gerekçelendirme’. MonoKL 4–5 (2008e):212–230.I (Excerpt of Westphal (2009c) in Turkish; http://monokurgusuzlabirent.blogspot.com.tr/2008/06/ 26 monokl-4-5-hegel-ozel-says-icindekiler.html) 2007 99. ‘Kant’s Anti-Cartesianism’. Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 46.4 (2007a):709–715.R Preçis of Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism (Westphal 2004a). DOI: 10.1017/S0012217300002183 ‘Proving Realism Transcendentally: Replies to Rolf George & William Harper’. Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 46.4 (2007b):737–750. R, 27 100. DOI: 10.1017/S0012217300002213 101. ‘Consciousness & its Transcendental Conditions: Kant’s Anti-Cartesian Revolt’. In: S. HEINÄMAA, V. LÄHTEENMÄKI & P. REMES, eds., Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007c), 223–243.I 102. ‘Êàíòîâñêèå Òðàíñöåíäåíòàëüíü³å Äîêàçàòåëüñòâà Ìåíòàëüíîãî Ñîäåðæàòåëüíîãî Ýêñòåðíàëèçìà’. In: Â.Ñ. ÑÒ¨ÏÈÍ & Í.Â. ÌÎÒÐÎØÈËÎÂÀ, eds., Èììàíóèë Êàíò: íàñëåäèå è ïðîåêò (Ìîêâà: Êàíîí+, 2007d), 78–89.I, 28 103. ‘Normative Constructivism: Hegel’s Radical Social Philosophy’. SATS – Nordic Journal of Philosophy 8.2 (2007e):7–41.R (Somewhat revised version of Westphal 2003f); DOI: 10.1515/SATS.2007.7. 2006 104. ‘Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell’. The European Journal of Philosophy 14.2 (2006a):274–302.I, R (Reprint: Westphal 2008d.) DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00226.x 105. ‘How does Kant Prove that We Perceive, and not merely Imagine, Physical Objects?’ The Review of Metaphysics 59.4 (2006b):781–806;R DOI: 10.2307/20130701. 106. ‘Science & the Philosophers’. In: H. KOSKINEN, S. PIHLSTRÖM & R. VILKKO, eds., Science: A Challenge to Philosophy? Scandinavian University Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences 27 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2006c), 125–152.I 107. ‘Kant on the State, Law, & Obedience to Authority in the Alleged “Anti-Revolutionary” Writings’. Reprint of Westphal (1992a) in: S. BYRD & J. HRUSCHKA, eds., Kant and Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006d), 201–244. (Awarded the 1994 George Armstrong Kelly Prize, as announced in Journal of the History of Philosophy 33.3 (1995):541.) 108. ‘Hegel & Realism’. In: J. MARGOLIS & J. SHOOK, eds., A Companion to Pragmatism (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006g), 177–183.I (3,300 word entry.) DOI: 10.1002/9780470997079.ch17 2005 109. ‘Kant, Wittgenstein & Transcendental Chaos’. Philosophical Investigations 28.4 (2005a):303–323.R DOI: 26 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2005.00261.x Title: ‘Mutual Recognition & Rational Justification in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit’. Replies to: Rolf GEORGE, ‘Kantian Constructions: On Westphal’s Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism’, Dialogue 46.4 (2007):717–28; William HARPER, ‘Comments on Westphal’, Dialogue 46.4 (2007):729–36. 28 Title: ‘Kant’s Transcendental Proofs of Mental Content Externalism’. In: R.S. Stjepin and M.V. Motroshilova, eds., Immanuel Kant: Legacy and Project (Moscow: Kanon+, 2007), 78–89. 27 16 110. ‘Kant, Hegel & Determining Our Duties’. In: S. BYRD & J. JOERDEN eds., Philosophia practica universalis. Festschrift für Joachim Hruschka. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 13 (2005b):335–354.I 111. „Von der Konvention zur Sittlichkeit. Humes Begründung einer Rechtsethik aus nach-Kantischer Perspektive“. In: D. HEIDEMANN & K. ENGELHARDT, Hgg., Ethikbegründungen Zwischen Universalismus und Relativismus (Berlin: DeGruyter, 2005c), 153–180.I (Festschrift für Klaus Düsing; original German version of Westphal 2010a). 112. ‘Hume, Hegel & Abstract General Ideas’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 51/52 (2005d): 28–55.I 2004 113. ‘Must the Transcendental Conditions for the Possibility of Experience be Ideal?’ In: C. FERRINI, ed., Eredità Kantiane (1804–2004): questioni emergenti e problemi irrisolti (Napoli: Bibliopolis, 2004b), 107–126.I 114. ‘Hegel, Epistemology & Hermeneutical Philosophizing: Reply to John McCumber’. Continental Philosophy Review 37.4 (2004c):495–503. DOI: 10.1007/s11007-005-6887-7 2003 115. ‘Epistemic Reflection & Cognitive Reference in Kant’s Transcendental Response to Scepticism’. Kant-Studien 94.2 (2003b):135–171.R DOI: 10.1515/kant.2003.009 116. ‘Epistemic Reflection & Transcendental Proof’. In: H-J. GLOCK, ed., Strawson and Kant (Mind Association Occasional Series; Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 2003c), 127–140.R 117. ‘Hegel’s Manifold Response to Scepticism in the Phenomenology of Spirit’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103.2 (2003d):149–178.I (Slightly revised English version of following item.) DOI: 10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00068.x 118. „Die Vielseitigkeit von Hegels Auseinandersetzung mit Skeptizismus in der Phänomenologie des Geistes“. Jahrbuch für Hegelforschung 8/9 (2002/03e):145–173.R (Original version of previous item.) 119. „Objektive Gültigkeit zwischen Gegebenem und Gemachtem. Hegels kantischer Konstruktivismus in der praktischen Philosophie“. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 11 (2003f):177–198.I, R (Original German version of Westphal 2007e.) 120. ‘Can Pragmatic Realists Argue Transcendentally?’ In: J. SHOOK, ed., Pragmatic Naturalism and Realism (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 2003g), 151–175.I, R 121. „Analytischer Gehalt und zeitgenössische Bedeutung von Hegels Kritik des unmittelbaren Wissens“. Jahrbuch für Hegelforschung 8/9 (2002/03h):129–143.R, 29 122. ‘Rationality & Relativism Revisited’. Inaugural lecture; UEA Papers in Philosophy 14 (2003i): 25–44.I 2002 123. ‘A Kantian Justification of Possession’. In: M. TIMMONS, ed., Kant’s Metaphysics of Ethics: Interpretive Essays (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002a), 89–109.I, R 29 Title: ‘The Analytic Content & Contemporaneous Significance of Hegel’s Critique of Immediate Knowledge’. 17 124. ‘L’ispirazione tragica della dialettica fenomenologica di Hegel’. C. Ferrini, trans., in: L.M. NAPOLITANO VALDITARA, ed., Antichi e nuovi dialoghi di sapienti e di eroi. Etica, linguaggio e dialettica fra tragedia greca e filosofia (Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste 2002b), 151–177.I, R (English version in: Westphal (2003a), Chs. 2–4.)30 125. ‘“Sense Certainty”, or Why Russell had no “Knowledge by Acquaintance”’. The Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 45/46 (2002c):110–123.I (Extended version in Westphal 2010b.) 126. ‘Rationality & Relativism: The Historical & Contemporary Significance of Hegel’s Response to Sextus Empiricus’. Esercizi Filosofici 6 (2002d):22–33.I http://www2.units.it/eserfilo/ 127. ‘Razionalità e relativismo: Il significato storico e contemporaneo della risposta hegeliana a Sesto Empirico’. Etica e Politica 4.1 (2002e).I (Italian tr. by Dr. C. FERRINI of 2002d.) http://www.units.it/~etica/2002_1/index.html 2001 128. ‘Freedom & the Distinction between Phenomena & Noumena: Is Allison’s View Methodological, Metaphysical, or Equivocal?’ Journal of Philosophical Research 26 (2001a):593–622.R 129. ‘Sketch of a Completeness Proof for Kant’s Table of Contracts’. In: V. GERHARDT, R. HORSTMANN & R. SCHUMACHER, Hgg., Kant and die Berliner Aufklärung. Akten des 9. Internationalen Kant-Kongreßes (Berlin: deGruyter, 2001b), 4.1:310–320.R 2000 130. ‘Kant, Hegel & the Fate of “the” Intuitive Intellect’. In: S. SEDGWICK, ed., The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000a), 283–305.R DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511527265.014 131. ‘Hegel’s Internal Critique of Naïve Realism’. Journal of Philosophical Research 25 (2000b):173–229.R 132. ‘Is Hegel’s Phenomenology Relevant to Contemporary Epistemology?’ Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 41/42 (2000c):43–85.I 133. ‘Hegel, Harris & Sextus Empiricus’. Owl of Minerva 31.2 (2000d):155–172.R 134. ‘Integrating Philosophies of Mind & of Education: Comments on Cunningham’. Philosophy of Education 1999 (Urbana, Ill.: Philosophy of Education Society, 2000e), 147–152.I 1998 (1999) 135. ‘Buchdahl’s “Phenomenological” View of Kant: A Critique’. Kant-Studien 89 (1998c):335–352.R 136. ‘Hegel’s Solution to the Dilemma of the Criterion’. In: J. STEWART, ed., The Phenomenology of Spirit Reader: A Collection of Critical and Interpretive Essays (Albany: SUNY Press, 1998d), 76–91.I (Discusses Chisholm, Moser, Alston, Fogelin; revised version of Westphal 1988a.) 137. ‘Hegel & Hume on Perception & Concept-Empiricism’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33.1 (1998e):99–123.R (Slightly revised English version of Westphal 1996b.) 138. „Metaphysische und Pragmatische Prinzipien in Kants Lehre von der Gehorsamspflicht gegen den Staat“. In: D. HÜNING und B. TUSCHLING, eds., Recht, Staat & Völkerrecht bei Immanuel 30 Title: ‘The Tragic Inspiration of Hegel’s Phenomenological Method’. 18 Kant (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1998g), 171–202.I (Excerpted from Westphal 1992a.)31 139. ‘On Hegel’s Early Critique of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’. In: S. HOULGATE, ed., Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998h), 137–166.R 140. ‘Harris, Hegel & the Spirit of the Phenomenology’. Clio 27.4 (1998i):551–572.I (Invited for a special issue on the work of H.S. Harris, with his replies.) 141. ‘Transcendental Reflections on Pragmatic Realism’. (Westphal 1998j) In: K.R. Westphal, ed. (1998b), Pragmatism, Reason, & Norms (New York, Fordham University Press), 17–59. 1997 142. ‘Affinity, Idealism & Naturalism: The Stability of Cinnabar & the Possibility of Experience’. Kant-Studien 88 (1997b):139–189.R 143. ‘Noumenal Causality Reconsidered: Affection, Agency & Meaning in Kant’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27.2 (1997c):209–245.R 144. ‘Do Kant’s Principles Justify Property or Usufruct?’ Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 5 (1997d):141–194.I 145. ‘Hegel, Formalism & Robert Turner’s Ceramic Art’. Jahrbuch für Hegelforschung 3 (1997e):259– 283.R (Revised & expanded version of Westphal 1985a.) 146. ‘Harris, Hegel & the Truth about Truth’. In: G. BROWNING, ed., Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Reappraisal (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997g), 23–29.I 147. ‘Frederick L. Will’s Pragmatic Realism: An Introduction’. (1997h) In: Frederick L. Will, Pragmatism and Realism, ed. K.R. Westphal (Lanham, Md., Rowman & Littlefield, 1997), xiii–lxi. 148. ‘Is Kant’s Table of Contracts Complete?’ In: The Proceedings of the Spindel Conference 1997: Kant’s Metaphysics of Ethics. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 Supplement (1997i):155–160.I 1996 149. ‘Kant, Hegel & the Transcendental Material Conditions of Possible Experience’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 17.1 (Nr. 33; 1996a):23–41.I DOI: 10.1017/S026352320000313X 150. „Vom Skeptizismus in Bezug auf die Sinne oder das Ding und die Täuschung“. In: H.F. FULDA & R.-P. HORSTMANN, Hgg., Skeptizismus und Spekulatives Denken in der Philosophie Hegels (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1996b), 153–176.I (Original German version of Westphal 1998e.) 1995 151. ‘Does Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science Fill a Gap in the Critique of Pure Reason?’ Synthese 103 (1995a):43–86.R 152. ‘Kant’s Dynamic Constructions’. Journal of Philosophical Research 20 (1995b):381–429.R DOI: 153. 10.5840/jpr_1995_8 ‘How “Full” is Kant’s Categorical Imperative?’ Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 3 (1995c):465–509.I Critical review article on: Chr. SCHNOOR, Kants kategorischer Imperativ 31 Title: ‘Metaphysical & Pragmatic Principles in Kant’s Doctrine of Obedience to the State’. 19 als Kriterium der Richtigkeit des Handelns, and B. HERMAN, The Practice of Moral Judgment. 154. ‘Kant’s Critique of Determinism in Empirical Psychology’. In: H. ROBINSON, ed., Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1995d), II.1: 357– 370.R 155. ‘Kant’s Proof of the Law of Inertia’. In: H. ROBINSON, ed., Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1995e), II.1:413–424.R 1993 156. (1994) ‘The Basic Context & Structure of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right’. In: F.C. BEISER, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993a), 234–269.I ‘Hegel on Political Representation: Laborers, Corporations & the Monarch’. The Owl of Minerva 25.1 (1993b):111–116. (Supplement to previous item.) 157. ‘Republicanism, Despotism & Obedience to the State: The Inadequacy of Kant’s Division of Powers’. Jahrbuch für Recht & Ethik/Annual Review of Law & Ethics 1 (1993c):263–281.I (Excerpt from Westphal 1992a.) 158. ‘Hegel, Idealism & Robert Pippin’. International Philosophical Quarterly 33.3 (1993d):263–272. 1992 159. ‘Kant on the State, Law & Obedience to Authority in the Alleged “Anti-Revolutionary” Writings’. Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1992a):383–426.R (Awarded the 1994 George Armstrong Kelly Prize, as announced in Journal of the History of Philosophy 33.3 (1995):541). 1991 160. ‘Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Moral World View’. Philosophical Topics 19.2 (1991a):133–176.I 161. ‘Kant’s Qualified Principle of Obedience to Authority in the Metaphysical Elements of Justice’. In: G. FUNKE, Hg., Akten des 7. internationalen Kant-Kongress (Bonn: Bouvier, 1991b), II.2: 353–366.R (Conspectus of Westphal 1992a.) 1989 162. (1990) ‘Hegel’s Attitude Toward Jacobi in the “Third Attitude of Thought Toward Objectivity”’. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 27.1 (1989b):135–156.R 1988 163. ‘Hegel’s Solution to the Dilemma of the Criterion’. The History of Philosophy Quarterly 5.2 (1988a): 173–188.R (Revised version in Westphal 1998d.) 164. ‘Sextus Empiricus Contra René Descartes’. Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88b):91–128.R 1985 (1987, 1986) ‘A World of Physics & Feeling’. In: Robert Turner, A Potter’s Retrospective (Milwaukee: Milwaukee Art Museum, 1985a).I (5,000 word critical analysis of Turner’s work; incorporated into Westphal 1997e.) 1984 165. ‘Was Nietzsche a Cognitivist?’ The Journal of the History of Philosophy 26.3 (1984a):343–363.R 20 166. ‘Nietzsche’s Sting & the Possibility of Good Philology’. International Studies in Philosophy 16.2 (1984b):71–90.R CRITICAL REVIEW ARTICLES: 167. ‘Kant, Understanding & Critical Philosophy, oder: Was heißt es, sich in Kants »opus postumum« zu orientieren?’I Critique (posted: 01.11.2016; 6340 words); on: Bryan Hall, The Post-Critical Kant (Routledge, 2015), invited author-meets-critics symposium, with J. EDWARDS, H.v.d. BERG and author’s replies; https://virtualcritique.wordpress.com/2016/11/01/kenneth-westphal-on-bryan-halls-the-post-critical-kant/. 168. ‘Comments on Graham Bird’s The Revolutionary Kant’. Kantian Review, 16.2 (2011g):1–11.I DOI: 169. 10.1017/S1369415411000100 ‘Hegel’s Standards of Political Legitimacy’. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 10 (2002f):307–320. On: F. NEUHOUSER, The Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory (Harvard University Press, 2000). 170. ‘Hegel’s Epistemology? Reflections on Some Recent Expositions’. Clio 28.3 (1999a):303–323.I, R On: Klaus Hartmann (articles); Joseph Flay, Hegel’s Quest for Certainty; Robert Pippin, Hegel’s Idealism; Michael Forster, Hegel and Skepticism; Terry Pinkard, Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason and Justus Hartnack, From Radical Empiricism to Absolute Idealism. 171. ‘Hegel, Philosophy & Mathematical Physics’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 36 (1997f): 1–15. On: P. Ziche, ed., Christoph Friedrich von Pfleiderer, Physik. Naturlehre nach Klügel (1804). 172. „Kants Urteilstafel. Zur Deutung von Reinhard Brandt“. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 49.1 (1995f):84–91.I On: R. Brandt, Die Urteilstafel. 21