Syllabus SOCI 513: Social Welfare and Social Policy
Erdem Yörükvisibility
…
description
7 pages
link
1 file
Course Description: This course discusses the development and structure of the welfare state from a comparative historical and political sociological perspective. Locating the welfare state within the broader context of the development of capitalism as a world systemic phenomenon, the course traces the scholarly discussions on the causes of the welfare state development and the functions of the welfare state. The course discusses the structural (economic or demographic) and political determinants of welfare state development, putting greater emphasis on the latter. As such, political legitimacy, electoral competition, political containment of unrest and political mobilization of popular support will be considered as critical factors shaping welfare policies. In a sense, the course is on the politics of welfare state. It will analyze the development of modern welfare states in the west and in developing countries, with a specific emphasis on so-called emerging markets. Welfare states in China, India, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, Indonesia and Turkey will be analyzed. In addition, the course will also pose more technical questions including the policy specific characteristics of existing welfare regimes.
Related papers
The welfare state in global perspective
Handbook of Comparative Politics, 2007
Over the last few decades of the twentieth century, the literature examining cross-national variation in the development of policies of social protection has been one of the most dynamic Welds of research in comparative politics. The sustained effort of sociologists, political scientists, and economists to understand the causes and consequences of different welfare states has generated a vast literature that is methodologically eclectic and theoretically vibrant. The accumulation of findings in this literature has fruitfully illuminated one of the most significant achievements of modern states: the ability to protect citizens from poverty in the event of sickness, old age, and unemployment. Advanced industrialized economies have been at the center of the empirical investigation of policies of social protection. This was a natural starting point, due to the magnitude and importance of the welfare state in these economies, which accounts for as much as 30 to 65 percent of GDP. Based on these cases, the literature developed important insights by noting that social policies clustered in distinct ‘‘families of nations’’ or ‘‘worlds of welfare capitalism’’ (Esping-Andersen 1990; Castles 1993; Huber and Stephens 2001). Nevertheless, important theoretical disagreement continues to exist about the relative importance of different political factors in explaining the diversity of observed policies and their distributional implications. In this essay, we argue that the most exciting research opportunities in the study of welfare states lie in examining the variation in policies of social protection in developing economies. Scholars of the welfare state need to broaden the scope of their analysis. In recent decades, policies of social protection in many developing economies have experienced a dramatic transformation. Two trends in the evolution of these policies require a systematic explanation. First, welfare states in developing countries have not unilaterally evolved towards a neo-liberal, residualistic model of social protection characterized by limited coverage and a private provision of benefits. While some Latin American countries have partially or fully privatized their old-age insurance programs, other economies — such as those of Taiwan or Korea — have enacted universal social insurance programs granting benefits to all citizens (Wong 2004). Second, we Wnd strong variation across policy areas in the evolution and distributional implications of these policies. In distributional terms, health care policies have been more progressive than have pension policies — an outcome that holds true for policy changes both in Latin America and in East Asia. These recent changes offer an important challenge to welfare state scholars. Are existing theories, based on the examples of advanced industrial economies, able to explain the recent transformations experienced by welfare states in developing countries? Which explanatory variables fare better than others and, if so, why? If existing explanations cannot account for the puzzling outcomes noted above, what should be the building blocks of explanations that can account for the divergence in social policy trajectories? This essay surveys the major approaches employed in study of the welfare state and evaluates the capacity of these theories to explain the bifurcated trajectory of reform experienced by social policies around the world.
Welfare Regime in the Global South: A short Introduction
Journal für Entwicklungspolitik
Evelyn Huber and John Stephens (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, xiii + 416 pp., $54, $18 pbk
Journal of Social Policy, 2003
The Welfare State: A Fundamental Dimension of Modern Government
European Journal of Sociology, 2014
What, in fact,isthe Welfare State? This article traces the emergence of the welfare state as a specific mode of government, describing its distinctive rationality as well as its characteristic forms, functions and effects. It identifies five sectors of welfare governance, the relations between them, and the various forms these take in different times and places. It discusses the contradictory commitments that shape welfare state practices and the problems associated with these practices and contradictions. It situates welfare state government within a long-term account of the changing relations between the social and the economic spheres. And it argues that the welfare state ought to be understood as a “normal social fact”—an essential (though constantly contested) part of the social and economic organization of modern capitalist societies.
Political Theories of the Welfare State
Social Service Review, 2002
We review the main theoretical conclusions from a quarter century of comparative studies of welfare states in the affluent democracies. We contrast early debates over the relative importance of industrialization, economic growth, and social classes for explaining welfare state differences with contemporary claims about the role of globalization, postindustrialism, and gender relations in shaping their futures. We evaluate the claims against recent empirical evidence with the aim of highlighting both important lessons from the past and promising directions for future analysis. Contemporary studies of the modern welfare state came of age in the 1970s. Historians, political scientists, and other social scientists had of course long since documented the origins and development of particular national social policies. The comparative focus of this new body of research was prefigured by a number of seminal studies written during the postwar decades (
(2022) Old and New Challenges for Welfare Regimes: A Global Perspective
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2022
This paper presents an introduction to the special issue titled "Old and New Challenges for Welfare Regimes: A Global Perspective" Design/methodology/approach • The authors of the special issue combine case studies and comparative analysis across America, Asia, Africa and Europe. The authors were invited to develop their studies with a focus on one or more of three axes: (1) Institutional and governance challenges surrounding the implementation and expansion of social welfare programs; (2) State of the art and diversity across emerging welfare states; (3) Challenges associated with migration and demographic pressures. Findings • Articles in this special issue contribute to our understanding of recent challenges and transformations of welfare regimes, with special attention to the following policy areas: youthemancipation, the reduction of poverty and income inequality, social protection and taxation, the role of historical institutionalism to better understand social policy implementation and expansion, the lack of transformative social protection in 'New Right' governments, determinants of social equality and the transformative effect of migration into welfare states. Originality • To our knowledge, the existing publications on transformations and challenges of welfare regimes are still very much centered around a Western-European context. The global perspective and diversity of policy areas covered aims to shed light on the important lessons and policy implications from less traditional welfare states.
Introduction to "The Origins of the Welfare State: Global and Comparative Approaches"
Zapruder / Storie in movimento, Zapruder World: An International Journal for the History of Social Conflict, Stefano Agnoletto
2016
Stefano Agnoletto, Brian J Griffith, and Cristina Palmieri, eds. "The Origins of the Welfare State: Global and Comparative Approaches" Zapruder World: An International Journal for the History of Social Conflict 3 (2016) ISSN: 2385-1171 View Volume: http://www.zapruderworld.org/volume-3/ "This volume of Zapruder World focuses on the global and comparative history of the welfare state. The articles in this third volume fit squarely into the philosophy of our action-oriented journal. They aim not only to interact with historiographical debates or to merely question aspects of mainstream literature on the topic, but they also seek to interrogate the welfare state in order to map the terrain with an eye to action and political alternatives. We all face the dominance of neoliberal ideologies in our daily lives, seeing the consequences of attacks against public programs in areas such as health, education, income-transfers, housing, etc. Moreover, as scholars, we aim to consciously denaturalize "liberal thought," which consistently downplays the role of welfare legislation and institutions. At the same time, we have sought to avoid any celebratory language regarding the welfare state in itself. By advocating for a critical appraisal of history as a space for conflict, this volume of Zapruder World challenges liberal-conciliatory descriptions of the past. We believe that an open debate on the origins of the welfare state, as well as a greater awareness of the transformations of both the notion of the welfare state and its material organization, provide the necessary standpoint to critically reconsider its role for the future. Finally, the articles in this volume challenge the dominant focus on the "crisis" of the welfare state, inviting scholars and activists to reflect on the many alternatives offered by the welfare state in responding to the needs of people in different geographical locations and at different historical periods."
Guest editorial: Old and New Challenges for Welfare Regimes – A Global Perspective
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2022
PurposeThis paper aims to present an introduction to the special issue titled “Old and New Challenges for Welfare Regimes: A Global Perspective.”Design/methodology/approachThe authors of the special issue combine case studies and comparative analysis across America, Asia, Africa and Europe. The authors were invited to develop the authors'ir studies with a focus on one or more of three axes: (1) institutional and governance challenges surrounding the implementation and expansion of social welfare programs,; (2) state of the art and diversity across emerging welfare states and; (3) challenges associated with migration and demographic pressures.FindingsArticles in this special issue contribute to the authors' understanding of recent challenges and transformations of welfare regimes, with special attention to the following policy areas: youth emancipation, the reduction of poverty and income inequality, social protection and taxation, the role of historical institutionalism to b...
Welfare States in Transition A critical analysis of recent research
Revue française de sociologie, 2002
Comparative research on the Welfare States has become a particularly fertile field for research in social sciences. Specifically, it has led to the combination of various scientific issues (gender theory, economic sociology, international comparison theory, sociology of international relations, neo-institutionalisms) that are usually juxtaposed elsewhere. Furthermore, the analyses carried out within the framework of this type of research enjoy an enviable level of integration into the political and social debates of the contemporary world. The aim of this article is to present and analyse some of the more significant contributions of the contemporary period. As it is not possible to develop an extensive analysis, this article will focus on three debates : the analysis of the various Welfare States and their possible classifications, the relation between globalisation and the evolution of the Welfare States, the new political configurations of the action within the Welfare States. At the same time, this analysis highlights the contribution of research to the development of a constantly evolving neo-institutionalist theory. The question of the evolution of the Welfare State has never been more topical than it is now, since the crisis of the Welfare State has been announced. This can be established by measuring just how far we have come. Up until the end of the seventies, very little was written on the subject. Not many comparative studies were carried out. The theoretical inspiration was mostly functionalist. The turning point in the seventies gave birth to a highly international field of research backed up by strong institutional support. The central issue is to discover the determining factors in the emergence and relative expansion of the Welfare States (Flora, 1986). The dominant theory very quickly became the school of the resources of power. The works of authors such as Stephens (1979), Korpi (1983), Esping-Andersen (1985) all attempt to demonstrate that the level of the mobilisation of labour and the access of left-wing political parties (social democracy) to power, are the main determining factors as regards the size and the more or less redistributive nature of the Welfare States. All of this research leads quite naturally to the hypothesis of the existence of several models of Welfare
SYLLABUS
SOCI 513: Social Welfare and Social Policy
Spring 2019
Instructor: Erdem Yörük
Place: SOS 143 Time: Wednesday 13:00-15:45
Office: SOS 136A Phone: x 1142 e-mail: [email protected]
Office hours: Monday Wednesday, 14.00-15.00, and by appointment
Course Description: This course discusses the development and structure of the welfare state
from a comparative historical and political sociological perspective. Locating the welfare state
within the broader context of the development of capitalism as a world systemic phenomenon,
the course traces the scholarly discussions on the causes of the welfare state development and
the functions of the welfare state. The course discusses the structural (economic or
demographic) and political determinants of welfare state development, putting greater
emphasis on the latter. As such, political legitimacy, electoral competition, political
containment of unrest and political mobilization of popular support will be considered as
critical factors shaping welfare policies. In a sense, the course is on the politics of welfare
state. It will analyze the development of modern welfare states in the west and in developing
countries, with a specific emphasis on so-called emerging markets. Welfare states in China,
India, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, Indonesia and Turkey will be analyzed. In addition, the
course will also pose more technical questions including the policy specific characteristics of
existing welfare regimes.
Course Requirements:
1.
Readings and Participation: In order to succeed in this course, you have to complete all
assigned readings and actively participate in class discussion. While there will be a discussion
lead for each week (see below), other seminar participants should come to class fully
prepared. You will develop at least 1 question from the readings and email them to me and
your classmates the night prior to class (Tuesday) by 10 pm. These questions should aim
towards constructing theoretical and methodological discussions regarding the
readings. 15%
2.
Discussion lead: The discussion lead for each session will summarize the readings and
discuss them in a relational manner. The discussant should also prepare points for discussion.
The presentation should be no longer than 30 minutes. The discussion lead will also submit a
short paper (3-4 pages, double spaced) that the discussion is based on. 15%
3.
Short paper proposal/problem statement (1-2 pages): This is to be submitted by the
seventh week of the class (March 20th). You will be expected to do a short presentation on
your proposal in class. Make enough copies for circulation to class members = 10 %
4.
Paper proposal: Submit a 3-4 page paper proposal (w/o bibliography) by the 11st week
of class. 20 % (April 17th)
5.
Research paper: Submit a 20 page final paper. Term papers are due May 26th. 40 %
1
Ethical guidelines: Check Sociology Department Guidelines on Academic Honesty.
Readings list
1. Introduction (February 6th)
2. History of the Welfare State (February 13rd)
Pierson, Chris. 1998. “Origins and Development of the Welfare State 1880-1975” in Pierson,
Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare, pp. 100-135
Kaufmann, Frank-Xaver and Frank Nullmeier. 2010. Post-War Welfare State Development.
in The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Edited by Francis G. Castles et al.
Oxford University Press
Kuhnle, Stein and Anne Sander. 2010. “The Emergence of the Western Welfare State.” in The
Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Edited by Francis G. Castles et al. Oxford
University Press
Goldberg, Gertrude S., and Marguerite G. Rosenthal. 2002. “Introduction: Three Stages of
Welfare Capitalism” in Diminishing Welfare: A Cross-National Study of Social
Provision. Westport, Connecticut - London: Auburn House. (pp 1-32)
3. Theories of the Welfare State (February 20th)
Offe, Claus. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State. Hutchinson & Co. (Publishers) Ltd
(Chapters 3,4,5 and 6) pp. 88-161
Quadagno, Jill. 1987. Theories of the Welfare State. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 13
(1987), pp. 109-128
Myles, John and Jill Quadagno. 2002. Political Theories of the Welfare State. Social Service
Review Vol. 76, No. 1, 75th Anniversary Issue, pp. 34-57
O'Connor, J. 1973. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin's (Chapter 6: Social
Expenses of Production: Warfare-Welfare State)
Yörük, Erdem and Kuhnle, Stein, The Politics of Welfare in Emerging Markets, (forthcoming
in Governance)
4. Welfare as Political Containment (February 27th)
Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A Cloward. 1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of
Public Welfare. New York: Pantheon Books. (Chapters 1 and 12)
Isaac, Larry, and William R. Kelly. 1981. “Racial Insurgency, the State, and Welfare
Expansion: Local and National Level Evidence from the Postwar United States.”
American Journal of Sociology 86 (6): 1348–86.
Fording, Richard C. 1997. “The Conditional Effect of Violence as a Political Tactic: Mass
Insurgency, Welfare Generosity, and Electoral Context in the American States.”
American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 1–29. doi:10.2307/2111707.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A Cloward, “The Structuring of Protest” in Poor People’s
Movement, 1979, Vintage Books
Çemen, Rahmi and Yörük, Erdem, “The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease: The Role of
Violent Civil Unrest in Global Social Assistance” (under review at World Politics)
2
5. Welfare and Social Movements (March 6th)
Mooney, Gerry, Jason Annetts, Alex Law, and Wallace McNeish. 2009. “Exploring the
Interrelationships Between Social Welfare and Social Movements: Why This Matters
for Social Policy.” Social Policy Association Annual Conference: ‘Learning from the
Past?’ Edinburgh: June 29 -July 1 2009
Amenta E, Caren N, Olasky SJ. 2005. “Age for leisure? Political mediation and the impact of
the pension movement on US old-age policy”. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:516–38
Marco G. Giugni, “Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social
Movements”, American Sociological Review, 1998. 98:371–93
Paul Burstein, “Social Movements and Public Policy”, in How social movements matter, eds,
Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, and Charles Filly, University of Minnesota, 1999.
Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E., & Su, Y. (2010). The Political Consequences of Social
Movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 287–307.
Meyer, David, “Social Movements and Public Policy: Eggs, Chicken, and Theory”, UC Irvine
CSD Working Papers, 2003
6. Welfare, Protest and Conflict
Burgoon, Brian. 2006. “On Welfare and Terror Social Welfare Policies and PoliticalEconomic Roots of Terrorism.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (2): 176–203.
doi:10.1177/0022002705284829.
Yörük, Erdem. 2012. “Welfare Provision as Political Containment: The Politics of Social
Assistance and the Kurdish Conflict in Turkey.” Politics & Society 40 (4): 517–47.
doi:10.1177/0032329212461130.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Lorraine C. Minnite. 2016. ‘Poor People’s Politics’. In The Oxford
Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty, eds. David Brady and Linda M. Burton.
Oxford University Press.
Rossella Ciccia and César Guzmán-Concha (2018), “Protest and the Politics of
Unemployment Insurance: Reforming Welfare States in Times of Austerity”, in Social
Welfare Responses in a Neoliberal Era Policies, Practices, and Social Problems, ed.
Mia Arp Fallov and Cory Blad, Brill Publications.
Barbara Zarate Tenorio, “Social Spending Responses to Organized Labor and Mass Protests
in Latin America, 1970-2007”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol 47, Issue 14, 2014
Dasgupta, Aditya, Kishore Gawande, and Devesh Kapur. 2017. “(When) Do Antipoverty
Programs Reduce Violence? India’s Rural Employment Guarantee and Maoist
Conflict”, International Organization, Summer 2017, pp. 605–632.
7. Welfare and Electoral/Elite Competition (March 13rd)
Allan, James P., and Lyle Scruggs. 2004. “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in
Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 496–
512. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x.
3
Barrilleaux, Charles, Thomas Holbrook, and Laura Langer. 2002. “Electoral Competition,
Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy.” American Journal of
Political Science 46 (2): 415–27. doi:10.2307/3088385.
Häusermann, Silja, Georg Picot and Dominik Geering (2012). “Rethinking Party Politics and
the Welfare State. Recent Advances in the Literature“, British Journal of Political
Science.
Hicks, Alexander M. and Duane H. Swank. 1992. Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending
in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82. American Political Science Review, Volume
86, Issue 3, pp. 658-674
Kitschelt, H. 2001. “Partisan Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment” in P. Pierson
(ed.).The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Selim Erdem Aytaç, “Distributive Politics in a Multiparty System: The Conditional Cash
Transfer Program in Turkey”, Comparative Political Studies XX(X) 1–27, 2013
8. Neoliberalism, retrenchment debate and the new welfare state of social assistance
and social care (March 27th)
Piven, Frances Fox, and Lorraine C. Minnite. 2015. “Crisis, Convulsion and the Welfare
State.” In Social Policy in Times of Austerity: Towards a New International Political,
edited by Kevin Farnsworth and Zoe Irving, 143–70: Policy Press.
Pierson, Paul. 1996. The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics Vol. 48, No. 2, pp.
143-179
Peter Starke, “The Politics of Welfare State Retrenchment: A Literature Review”, Social
Policy & Administration, 40, 1, 2006.
Green-Pedersen, C. 2004 “The dependent variable problem within the study of welfare state
retrenchment: defining the problem and looking for solutions,” Journal of
Comparative Policy Analysis.
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003), New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and
globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975-95, American Political
Science Review
Gough, Ian. 1999. “Social Assistance Regimes: A Cluster Analysis.” Journal of European
Social Policy 11 (2): 165–70. doi:10.1177/095892870101100205.
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2011. “The Diffusion of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in
the Americas.” Global Social Policy 11 (2-3): 250–78.
doi:10.1177/1468018111421295.
Barrientos, Armando and David Hulme. 2009. “Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest in
Developing Countries: Reflections on a Quiet Revolution”. Oxford Development
Studies, Volume 37, Issue 4, 2009
Daly, Mary, and Jane Lewis. 2000. “The concept of social care and the analysis of
contemporary welfare states.” British Journal of Sociology 51 (2): 281–98
9. Welfare regimes (April 3rd)
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, N.J.:
Princeton University Press.
10. Spring Break (April 10th)
4
Optional reading to enjoy during the spring break:
Edwin Amenta and Alexander Hicks, “Research Methods”, in The Oxford Handbook of the
Welfare State. Edited by Francis G. Castles et al. Oxford University Press
11. Three Worlds of Welfare Literature 1 (A.K.A. Welfare Modelling Business)
(April 17th)
Powell, Martin, and Armando Barrientos. 2011. “An Audit of the Welfare Modelling
Business.” Social Policy & Administration 45 (1): 69–84. doi:10.1111/j.14679515.2010.00754.x.
Scruggs, Lyle A., and James P. Allan. 2008. “Social Stratification and Welfare Regimes for
the Twenty-First Century: Revisiting The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.”
World Politics 60 (4): 642–64. doi:10.1353/wp.0.0020.
Danforth, Benjamin. 2014. “Worlds of Welfare in Time: A Historical Reassessment of the
Three-World Typology.” Journal of European Social Policy 24 (2): 164–82.
doi:10.1177/0958928713517919.
Emmenegger, Patrick, Jon Kvist, Paul Marx, and Klaus Petersen. 2015. “Three Worlds of
Welfare Capitalism: The Making of a Classic.” Journal of European Social Policy 25
(1): 3–13. doi:10.1177/0958928714556966.
Yörük, Erdem, Öker, İbrahim, Yıldırım, Kerem and Yakut-Çakar, Burcu, (2019) “The
Variable Selection Problem in the Three Worlds of Welfare Literature”, Social
Indicators Research.
Powell, Martin, and Armando Barrientos. 2004. “Welfare Regimes and the Welfare Mix.”
European Journal of Political Research 43 (1): 83–105. doi:10.1111/j.14756765.2004.00146.x.
Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2010) ‘Models of the welfare state’, in F. G. Castles, S. Leibfried
and J. Lewis (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford
University Press, pp. 569–83.
Scruggs, L. (2007) ‘Welfare state generosity across space and time’, in N. Siegal and J.
Clasen (eds.), Welfare Reform in Advanced Societies: The Dependent Variable
Problem in Comparative Welfare State Analysis, London: Edward Elgar, pp. 133–
65.
Claire Bambra, “Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: a cluster analysis”, International
Journal of Social Welfare, 2007
12. Welfare Regimes in the Global South (April 24th)
Ferrera, Maurizio. 1996. “The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe.” Journal of
European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1177/095892879600600102.
Wood, Geof, and Ian Gough. 2006. “A Comparative Welfare Regime Approach to Global
Social Policy.” World Development 34 (10): 1696–1712.
doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.02.001.
Franzoni, J. M. (2008) ‘Welfare regimes in Latin America: capturing constellations of
markets, families, and policies’, Latin American Politics and Society, 50, 2, 67–100.
5
Hudson, J. and Kühner, S. (2012) ‘Analyzing the productive and protective dimensions of
welfare: looking beyond the OECD’, Social Policy and Administration, 46, 1, 35-60.
Abu Sharkh, M. and Gough, I. (2010) ‘Global welfare regimes: a cluster analysis’, Global
Social Policy, 10, 1, 27–58.
Stephan Haggard and Robert R., “The Political Economy of Welfare Reform,” in
Development, Democracy and Welfare States
13. Turkey, South Africa and Post-communist welfare states (April 30th)
Buğra, Ayşe, and Çağlar Keyder. 2006. “The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation.”
Journal of European Social Policy 16 (3): 211–28. doi:10.1177/o.
Seekings, Jeremy. 2015. Policy, Politics and Poverty in South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan,
UK (Chapters 6 and 10)
Yörük, Erdem, and Hişyar Özsoy. 2013. “Shifting Forms of Turkish State Paternalism
Toward the Kurds: Social Assistance as ‘benevolent’ Control.” Dialectical
Anthropology 37 (1): 153–58.
Yörük, Erdem and Gençer, Alper Şükrü, “The Politics of Social Assistance in South Africa:
How Protests and Electoral Politics Shape the Child Support Grant”, (forthcoming at
Governance)
Yoltar, Çağrı and Yörük, Erdem, “The Discursive Politics of Welfare: Social Policies in
Turkey and The Kurdish Conflict” (forthcoming at Governance)
Linda. J. Cook, “Eastern Europe and Russia”, in The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State.
Edited by Francis G. Castles et al. Oxford University Press
Stephan Haggard and Robert R., “The Legacy of the Socialist Welfare State, 1990–2005,” in
Development, Democracy and Welfare States
Başak Akkan, “The Politics of Care in Turkey: Sacred Familialism in a Changing Political
Context”, Social Politics, 2018 Volume 25 Number 1
Berna Yazici, “The Return to the Family: Welfare, State, and Politics of the Family in
Turkey” Anthropological Quarterly, Vol. 85, No. 1 (Winter 2012), pp. 103-140
14. Brazil, Mexico and Latin America (May 8th)
Candelaria Garay, (2016), Social Policy Expansion in Latin America, Cambridge University
Press, (Chapters 1, 2 and 8)
De La O, A. L. (2013). Do Conditional Cash Transfers Affect Electoral Behavior? Evidence
from a Randomized Experiment in Mexico. American Journal of Political Science,
57(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00617.x
Lomelí, Enrique Valencia. 2008. “Conditional Cash Transfers as Social Policy in Latin
America: An Assessment of their Contributions and Limitations,” Annual Review of
Sociology: 475-93.
Zucco, Cesar. 2013. “When Payouts Pay Off: Conditional Cash Transfers and Voting
Behavior in Brazil 2002–10.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (4): 810–22.
doi:10.1111/ajps.12026.
Yörük, Erdem, Öker, İbrahim and Şarlak, Lara, “Indigenous Unrest and the Contentious
Politics of Social Assistance in Mexico” (under review at World Development)
Evelyne Huber & Juan Bogliaccini, “Latin America”, in The Oxford Handbook of the
Welfare State. Edited by Francis G. Castles et al. Oxford University Press
6
Stephan Haggard and Robert R., “Democracy, Economic Crisis, and Social Policy in Latin
America, 1980–2005,” in Development, Democracy and Welfare States
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estévez, and Beatriz Magaloni. 2016. “The Political Logic
of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico.” Cambridge
Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316492710. (Introduction)
15. India and China (May 15th)
Gao, Q. (2017). Welfare, Work, and Poverty: Social Assistance in China. Oxford and New
York: Oxford University Press. (Chapter 1 and 2)
Hong, L., and K. Kongshoj. 2014. “China’s Welfare Reform: An Ambiguous Road Towards a
Social Protection Floor.” Global Social Policy 14 (3): 352–68.
doi:10.1177/1468018113513914.
Lü, Xiaobo. 2013 Social Policy and Regime Legitimacy: The Effects of Education Reform in
China. American Political Science Review 108(2): 423-437
Walker, Alan, and Chack-kie Wong. 2005. East Asian Welfare Regimes in Transition: From
Confucianism to Globalisation. Bristol: Policy Press. (Chapter 1 Introduction and
Chapter 3 Social Welfare in China)
Thachil, Tariq. 2014. “Elite Parties and Poor Voters: Theory and Evidence from India.”
American Political Science Review 108 (02): 454–77.
doi:10.1017/S0003055414000069.
Koyuncu, Murat, Yörük, Erdem and Gürel, Burak, Welfare as Counter-Insurgency in
Contemporary India (working paper)
Drèze, Jean and Reetika Khera. (2016). Recent Social Security Initiatives in India. World
Development 98: 555-572.
Solinger, D. J. (2015). Three Welfare Models and Current Chinese Social Assistance:
Confucian Justifications, Variable Applications. The Journal of Asian Studies, 74(4),
977–999. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911815001126
Ito Peng & Joseph Wong, “East Asia”, in The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Edited
by Francis G. Castles et al. Oxford University Press
Maiorano, D., Das, U., & Masiero, S. (2018). "Decentralisation, Clientelism and Social
Protection Programmes: A Study of India’s MGNREGA", Oxford Development
Studies 46 (4): 536-549.
7
Related papers
PENGARUH KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL DAN KECERDASAN SPIRITUAL
MAHASISWA AKUNTANSI TERHADAP TINGKAT
PEMAHAMAN AKUNTANSI
JURNAL SOCIOSCIENTIA KOPERTIS WILAYAH XI KALIMANTAN, 2012
"Testimoni della fede cristiana e nuovi martiri in Europa" di Matteo Calisi
“La luce che viene da Oriente” - Kairos 2003 Meeting Internazionale per la Pace fra le Nazioni - Fiera del Levante - Ottobre 2003
La NATO esce dal vertice di Vilnius più ricca, più aggressiva e più armata
Pagine Esteri, 2023
DESAFIO DOS ESTUDOS SOBRE ATEOLOGIA E ATEÍSMO NA ANTIGUIDADE
Anais do I Colóquio Nacional de História e Literatura - XV Semana de História de Picos: escritas de si, ficção e subjetividades, UFPI, 2023
Principles of baroque music: Improvisation, ornamentation, polyphony
Zbornik Akademije umetnosti, 2016
Alfabetização e mediação lúdica
Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação
Problems of Educational Administration: Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, and Innovative Strategies of Non-Teaching Personnel to Improve the Administrative Management System of Public Secondary Schools
Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal , 2023
Viral Bcl2s’ transmembrane domain interact with host Bcl2 proteins to control cellular apoptosis
Nature Communications, 2020
Single Atom Substitution Alters the Polymorphic Transition Mechanism in Organic Electronic Crystals
Chemistry of Materials, 2019
Goal Modelling for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents
Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track, 2021
Maternal and gestational influences on childhood blood pressure
Pediatric Nephrology, 2019
Behavioral compatibility and reproductive outcomes in two distant populations of captive brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater)
Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2008
An Exposition of Uncertain Reasoning Based Analysis
Current State and Future Perspectives, 2011
Related topics
Social PolicyWelfare StatePolitics Of Social PolicyComparative Welfare SystemsHistory of Social WelfarePublic Policy - Social Welfare P...History of Social Policy and the...Comparative Social PolicySocial WelfareWelfarePolitics of Education and Social...Social Policy and Social WorkComparative Social Policy. Welfa...Social Policy & DevelopmentPolitics of social work and soci...Public/Social Policy