Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Imagining Ritual Murder

2018, conference: Words that Kill

This paper examines how ideas of “Jewish ritual murder” were created, transmitted and popularized. It draws on case studies from the cultural history of a Hungarian blood libel (Tiszaeszlár, 1882–83), examining two separate discourses. Firstly, the genesis, function and diffusion of anti-Semitic propaganda paintings in the last two decades of the 19th century and secondly, folk songs related to the blood libel, their characteristics and the role they played in post-WWII pogroms. Already in 1882, a monumental propaganda painting was created in Zagreb, depicting the imagined murder scene. This image was popularized by photographs (sold locally and via mail order by the painter himself) as well as further graphic interpretations. Another monumental (2 x 4 meters large) painting related more loosely to the specific blood libel was created in the 1890s as part of an anti-Semitic business venture. This work was exhibited at multiple venues from Paris to St. Petersburg (usually in shopping arcades fashionable among the bourgeoisie), mostly with the alleged attribution to a famous Hungarian painter living in the French capital, Mihály Munkácsy. The painting was toured across Europe in order to capitalize on the international fame of the supposed creator as well as the scandalous topic, in accordance with the taste of political anti-Semitism emerging in this period. On the other hand, from the time of the Tiszaeszlár case up until – at least – the 1970s, a substantial reception of the affair can be attested in folk songs, which showcase – rather than the original blood libel accusation – blood-drinking and cannibalism. Characteristic of these songs is the contamination of the blood libel myth with different, familiar elements (religious motifs as well as popular fables such as the Little Red Riding Hood), which helped substantially the embedding of the story. The social knowledge about “Jewish ritual murder” perpetuated in and transmitted through these songs offer an explanation for the emergence of blood libel accusations in Hungary against survivors of the Holocaust. Although this “knowledge” was not necessarily the major drive behind post-WWII anti-Jewish pogroms, it certainly guided and channelled the hostility along certain violent patterns. The two case studies represent different facets of the cultural reception history of a specific blood libel. The paintings were intended for the bourgeoisie as part of an anti-Semitic business venture, while the folk songs developed in a rural setting. Although we are not aware of the imminent effect of the anti-Semitic imagery analysed above, the potential dangers and violent consequences of the diffusion and perpetuation of such “social knowledge” are exemplified by the role these folk songs played in post-WWII pogroms.

Imagining Ritual Murder Daniel Véri This paper examines how ideas of “Jewish ritual murder” were created, transmitted and popularized. It draws on case studies from the cultural history of a Hungarian blood libel (Tiszaeszlár, 1882–83), examining two separate discourses. Firstly, the genesis, function and diffusion of anti-Semitic propaganda paintings in the last two decades of the 19th century and secondly, folk songs related to the blood libel, their characteristics and the role they played in post-WWII pogroms. Already in 1882, a monumental propaganda painting was created in Zagreb, depicting the imagined murder scene. This image was popularized by photographs (sold locally and via mail order by the painter himself) as well as further graphic interpretations. Another monumental (2 x 4 meters large) painting related more loosely to the specific blood libel was created in the 1890s as part of an anti-Semitic business venture. This work was exhibited at multiple venues from Paris to St. Petersburg (usually in shopping arcades fashionable among the bourgeoisie), mostly with the alleged attribution to a famous Hungarian painter living in the French capital, Mihály Munkácsy. The painting was toured across Europe in order to capitalize on the international fame of the supposed creator as well as the scandalous topic, in accordance with the taste of political anti-Semitism emerging in this period. On the other hand, from the time of the Tiszaeszlár case up until – at least – the 1970s, a substantial reception of the affair can be attested in folk songs, which showcase – rather than the original blood libel accusation – blood-drinking and cannibalism. Characteristic of these songs is the contamination of the blood libel myth with different, familiar elements (religious motifs as well as popular fables such as the Little Red Riding Hood), which helped substantially the embedding of the story. The social knowledge about “Jewish ritual murder” perpetuated in and transmitted through these songs offer an explanation for the emergence of blood libel accusations in Hungary against survivors of the Holocaust. Although this “knowledge” was not necessarily the major drive behind post-WWII anti-Jewish pogroms, it certainly guided and channelled the hostility along certain violent patterns. The two case studies represent different facets of the cultural reception history of a specific blood libel. The paintings were intended for the bourgeoisie as part of an anti-Semitic business venture, while the folk songs developed in a rural setting. Although we are not aware of the imminent effect of the anti-Semitic imagery analysed above, the potential dangers and violent consequences of the diffusion and perpetuation of such “social knowledge” are exemplified by the role these folk songs played in post-WWII pogroms.