Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
This research study intends to explore the importance of teaching phrasal verbs in the English classroom, as well as to identify the effects that teaching phrasal verbs following an explicit approach has on their acquisition as evidenced by the students' oral performance. The paper will also point out the importance of engaging students in different systematic classroom activities to be able to determine whether their phrasal verbs acquisition becomes significant and improves their oral performance. Finally, the research intends to understand if there is a correlation between the acquisition of phrasal verbs through explicit and systematic activities used in the classroom, and the students' performance and proceduralization of phrasal verbs; and if they when presented and studied explicitly in class, can help the students to incorporate them in their oral performance.
ELT journal, 1990
Phrasal verbs create specialproblems forstudents, partly because there are so many of them, but also because the combination of verb and particle seems so often completely random. These difficulties are sometimes increased by the way in which phrasal verbs are presented in course books or by teachers telling students that they will just have to learn them by heart, thereby implying that there is no system. However, if one looks closely at the particle, patterns start to emerge which suggest that the combinations are not so random after all. A more flexible approach to the relationships between phrasal verbs enables the outline of a system to establish itself. This article looks at how this system works and also at the implications for teachers and course book writers.
Journal of Communicative English, 2017
The main thrust of this paper is to investigate the syntactic and semantic features of the English phrasal verbs and examine the extent to which undergraduate students understand these features. Phrasal verbs from the stand point of this study were classified into subgroups according to their syntactic and semantic characteristics. The investigation, which is preceded by an extensive literature review, is aimed at tackling silent issues related to phrasal verbs. The paper shades light on the basic definitions of phrasal verbs, deals with the importance of phrasal verbs in English, and examines the syntactic and semantic features of phrasal verbs; to reveal whether these phrasal verbs are transitive or intransitive and separable or inseparable. It also focuses on the differences between phrasal verbs and prepositional verbs. Finally, the literal and idiomatic usage of English phrasal verbs has been reviewed. 684 fresh undergraduate students of Federal College of Education, Zaria, who registered and passed GENS 103 (English and Communication Skills) at credit level and above were selected for the study out of the over 1,200 that have registered for the course. In the light of the findings of the study a number of conclusions are drawn which includes: English phrasal verb consists of two basic components: a lexical verb and a particle (an adverb or a preposition), the meaning of the phrasal verbs is not implied in the meaning of the constituent elements that form them, both transitive and intransitive phrasal verbs can be used as phrasal verb but their state will be different. The results also reveal that although a number of the participants can be said to understand the different characteristics of English phrasal verbs,(43.85% on semantic knowledge, 50.58% on syntactic knowledge and 39.91% on the distinction between Phrasal verbs and Prepositional Phrases) however, larger percentage of them(56.14%, 49.41% and 60.08% respectively) still find phrasal verbs difficult to understand.
Open Philosophy, 2024
This article takes as its point of departure Hannah Arendt's discussion of public happiness, contextualising it within her thoughts on politics, democracy and revolution. It draws on Arendt's discussion of how the expression "pursuit of happiness" has historically shifted from a public understanding of happiness into an increasingly privatised one. The article engages with Arendt's account of public happiness in order to reanimate her radical democratic critique of how representative politics reduces the scope of political action and participation; and how the notion of happiness in a neoliberal era can only be interpreted in economistic and subjectivist terms. Furthermore, the article turns to examine how recent works in contemporary political thought, namely, those by Adriana Cavarero and Judith Butler, extend and transform the stakes of Arendt's account of public happiness. On one hand, Cavarero's notion of surging democracy is considered as an account of radical politics that keeps alive the Arendtian concern with public happiness by contextualising it within contemporary political struggles and social movements. On the other hand, Butler problematises Arendt's discussion of politics for its neglect of precarity; however, this article argues that Butler's work on assembly extends Arendt's by highlighting possibilities of resistance, radical democracy and even public happiness amid experiences of loss and grief. Although prima facie it might appear that happiness and precarity are opposed to each other, this article points towards contemporary political practices, such as those of Ni Una Menos, that are critically reanimating public happiness through the intertwining of affective registers that range from joy to grief.
Bonhoeffer Congress XIV, 2024
Presentation to the 14th International Dietrich Bonhoeffer Congress, Sydney Australia, 16 January 2024. How Bonhoeffer read Heidegger and how their ideas on care and connectedness and time are helpful to consider in relation to climate change. Theology, anthropology and epistemology as nested system in Bonhoeffer's Act and Being. Christian cosmology and climate change. Rebrightening the planet as an essential climate policy.
Άλληλον, 2022
Το ό,τι η επιχειρηματικότητα είναι διεθνοποιημένη είναι πέρα από κάθε αμφιβολία. Δεν νομίζω να υπάρχει νέος ή ώριμος επιχειρηματίας που δεν κδραστηριοποιείται ή δεν θα ήθελε να κινηθεί πέρα από τα οικονομικά όρια της χώρας. Απαραίτητη προϋπόθεση για την προσφορά αγαθών και υπηρεσιών σε άλλους οικονομικούς πολιτισμούς είναι η (διαπολιτισμική) επικοινωνία, δηλαδή η στοχευμένη διάδραση με ανθρώπους με διαφορετικό πολιτισμικό υπόβαθρο είτε βρίσκονται στη χώρα μας είτε αλλού. Ο πολιτισμός είναι αυτός ο παράγοντας που ρυθμίζει την καθημερινότητα της συνύπαρξης των ανθρώπων,. Γεννά, δηλαδή, τη βάση της συνεννόησης και της αποφυγής συγκρούσεων μέσα από τη δημιουργία κοινού πλαισίου. Για τον Αμερικανό ανθρωπολόγο Clifford Geertz ο πολιτισμός ορίζεται ως ο ιστός που έχουν υφάνει οι ίδιοι οι άνθρωποι. Ο πολιτισμός ορίζει και περιορίζει τα άτομα μέσα στον ιστό, αλλά και τα ίδια τα άτομα συμβάλλουν στη διαχρονική μετεξέλιξή του. Τί γίνεται όταν στον ιστό μας βρεθούν άνθρωποι που προέρχονται από άλλον ιστό ή εμείς βρεθούμε σε κάποιον άλλον ιστό για λόγους κοινωνικούς ή επαγγελματικούς; Τότε ο πολιτισμικός ιστός μπορεί να μετατραπεί σε ναρκοπέδιο. Σίγουρα η (επιφανειακή) γλωσσομάθεια (που αγνοεί τις πολιτισμικές παραμέτρους) διευκολύνει σε έναν βαθμό την επικοινωνία, το διάλογο και την ανταλλαγή πληροφοριών που οικοδομούν σχέσεις με πελάτες ή συνεργάτες σε ξένους ιστούς, σε ξένες αγορές. Τα Αγγλικά ως διεθνή γλώσσα έχουν συμβάλλει στην κατάλυση αρκετών εμποδίων επικοινωνίας στη διεθνή επιχειρηματικότητα. Θα έλεγα όμως και τα Κινεζικά, τα Αραβικά, τα Πορτογαλικά και τα Ισπανικά αξίζουν τον ποιοτικό χαρακτηρισμό διεθνείς γλώσσες και έχουν κάνει την επικοινωνία ευκολότερη – σε αρκετές περιπτώσεις. Σε άλλες περιπτώσεις εγκλώβισαν τους ανθρώπους σε ξένους, άγνωστους πολιτισμικούς ιστούς.
Recherches en Communication, 1997
Les systèmes symboliques sont des artefacts. Leurs traits syntaxiques et sémantiques ne sont pas dictés par le champ, mais résultent de décisions que nous prenons concernant la façon dont ce champ doit être organisé. Les systèmes que nous construisons déterminent les similarités et les différences que nous reconnaissons, les niveaux de précision que nous pouvons produire, les degrés de détermination que nous pouvons atteindre. (.. .) En construisant un système, nous ne partons jamais de zéro. Nous commençons inévitablement avec certaines conceptions des objets du domaine et avec certaines convictions qui les concernent. Cela guide nos constructions. En construisant un système verbal, notre but est d'organiser un domaine d"une façon telle que nous puissions formuler de plus en plus d'énoncés intéressants et précis à son sujetz. L'hypothèse principale du livre que j'ai consacré aux Textes : types et prototypes3 est celle de gradients de typicalité. Dans cette 3 J.-M. ADAM, Les u›xus.-types et prototypes, Paris, Nathan, C011. FAC, 1992. Recherches en communication, n°7, (1997). __1__2 __ __ JEAN-M_1__C_H_E}L ADA_M__ ___ ________ _ _ perspective, tout texte est plus ou moins narratif, plus ou moins descriptif, plus ou moins argumentatif, plus ou moins explicatif ou encore dialogal. Comme le souligne la réflexion épistémologique citée en exergue, la façon dont je choisis d'organiser, en le théorisant, le domaine est un point de vue particulier sur les textes/discours, un point de vue déterminé par une finalité descriptive: "formuler de plus en plus d'énoncés intéressants et précis" à propos des textes narratifs. * J. MOLINO, "Thèses sur le langage, le discours, la littérature et le symbolique",
Kobieta na przestrzeni dziejów, t. VI, eds. B. Cecota, J. Kuchta, IHiSM, Piotrków Trybunalski 2024, 2024
Universidad de Guayaquil, 2017
Yale University Press eBooks, 1976
Factor Exacta/Faktor exacta, 2022
Polymer Engineering & Science, 2017
ISDA Journal:Studies in Development and Public Policy, 2024
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2014