GHANA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TEACHERS (GNAT)
&
TEACHERS & EDUCATIONAL WORKERS (TEWU) OF GHANA
TRADES UNION CONGRESS
Teacher Attrition in Ghana
Results of a Questionnaire Survey
2009
Contents
Contents ................................................................................................................................................... 1
List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................... 4
List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... 5
CONTRIBUTORS ............................................................................................................................... 6
SECTION 1 ............................................................................................................................................. 7
1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 7
SECTION 2 .......................................................................................................................................... 10
2 Background Information ............................................................................................................. 10
2.1 Education in the Colonial Era ............................................................................................... 10
2.2 Education in the Post-Independence Era ................................................................................. 12
2.3 Current State of Education in Ghana ....................................................................................... 15
SECTION 3 ........................................................................................................................................... 20
1 Teacher Attrition: A Review of the Literature .......................................................................... 20
SECTION 4 ........................................................................................................................................... 23
Survey Results ................................................................................................................................... 23
4.1 Data .......................................................................................................................................... 23
4.2 Key Findings from the Survey ..................................................................................................... 24
4.2.1 Demographic Profile of Respondents ................................................................................... 24
4.2.2 Educational Qualification and Professional Status ............................................................... 25
4.2.3
Teacher Attrition ............................................................................................................ 26
4.2.4 Plans for further education .................................................................................................... 26
4.2.5 Plans after further Education ................................................................................................ 28
4.2.6 Wages ................................................................................................................................... 30
4.2.7 Access to Benefits................................................................................................................. 32
4.2.8 Job Satisfaction ..................................................................................................................... 33
SECTION 5 .......................................................................................................................................... 36
2
Conclusion and Recommendation ...................................................................................................... 36
References.............................................................................................................................................. 41
3
List of Tables
Table 1 School enrolment levels from 1951-1970 ................................................................... 13
Table 2 Gross Enrolment Rates (GER) for 2003/2004 to 2005/2006 & Net Enrolment Rates
(NER) in Primary Schools (2004/05 to 2007/08) .................................................................... 16
Table 3 Trend in Public Expenditure on Education from 2000-2008 (GHC Millions) ........... 18
Table 4 Teaching Staff (TS) and Non-Teaching Staff (NTS) Status by Region ..................... 19
Table 5 Distribution of Survey Questionnaires Completed & Returned by Region ................ 23
Table 6 Age distribution of Respondents ................................................................................. 24
Table 7 Marital Status of Respondents .................................................................................... 24
Table 8 Number of Children of Respondents .......................................................................... 25
Table 9 Respondents‟ current levels of Qualification .............................................................. 25
Table 10 Professional Status of Respondents .......................................................................... 25
Table 11 Plans to Further Education ........................................................................................ 26
Table 12 Preferred Field of Study for Further Education ........................................................ 27
Table 13 Table 4.8: Plans to apply for Study Leave with Pay ................................................. 27
Table 14 Reasons for Further Education .................................................................................. 27
Table 15 Plans after further education ..................................................................................... 28
Table 16 Preferred Sector of Employment after further education for those who will not return
to the Classroom....................................................................................................................... 29
Table 17 Work experience in other professions ....................................................................... 30
Table 18 Gross Monthly Wages ............................................................................................... 31
Table 19 Satisfaction with Pay................................................................................................. 31
Table 20 Access to Social Security .......................................................................................... 32
Table 21 Access to Paid Annual Leave.................................................................................... 32
Table 22 Access to Paid Sick Leave ........................................................................................ 32
Table 23 Access to Selected Non-Statutory Benefits .............................................................. 33
Table 24 Are you satisfied with your work as a teacher .......................................................... 34
Table 25 Respondents‟ levels of satisfaction with the teaching profession ............................. 34
Table 26 Would you recommend the teaching profession to your children or relatives ......... 34
4
List of Abbreviations
DfID
Department for International Development
EFA
Education for All‟ Progrmme
ERP
Economy Recovery Programme
ESP
Education Strategic Plan
FCUBE
Free Compulsory Universal Basic Education
FUPE
Free Universal Primary Education
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
GER
Gross Enrollment Rate
GES
Ghana Education Service
GET Fund
The Ghana Education Trust Fund
GNAT
Ghana National Association of Teachers
JSS
Junior Secondary Schools
NDC
National Democratic Congress
NER
Net Enrolment Rate
NGO
Non-Governmental Organization
NPP
New Patriotic Party
PTAs
Parent-Teacher Associations
SMCs
School Management Committees
TEWU
Teachers and Educational Workers Union
TUC
Ghana Trades Union Congress
5
CONTRIBUTORS
Researchers
Dr. Yaw Baah
Kwabena Nyarko Otoo
Clara Osei-Boateng
Coordinators
Helena Awurusa (GNAT)
M.S. Bogobiri (TEWU)
Supervisors
Irene Duncan-Adanusa, General Secretary, GNAT
Daniel Ayim Antwi, General Secretary, TEWU of Ghana TUC
6
SECTION 1
1 Introduction
This is a report of a study on teacher attrition in the pre-tertiary educational system in Ghana.
The main question that motivated this study is: Why are teachers leaving the classrooms?
The information gathered in this study provides the basis for GNAT and TEWU (the two
unions that commissioned this study) to engage the relevant authorities in the educational
sector in order to keep teachers in the profession. GNAT and TEWU believe strongly that the
most effective way to improve access to education and the quality of education in Ghana, in
line with the objectives of the „Education for All‟ (EFA) Programme, is to attract and retain
qualified teachers in classrooms especially at the pre-tertiary level.
The role of formal education in the development processes is well recognized all over the
world. Education is a key contributor to social development and constitutes the bedrock for
sustainable economic development. According to Oduro (2000), knowledge and technology
are increasingly becoming the basis of competitive advantage in the world. The quality of a
country‟s stock of human capital influences the extent to which knowledge and technology
can be utilized to enhance productivity and to improve the well-being of the citizens. These
can be achieved through formal education and training. Formal education is also the most
effective means of skills acquisition and the development of the human capital stock.
Moreover, education increases the ability to understand, appreciate and critique new ideas,
and it can facilitate the adoption and modification of technology to suit a country‟s peculiar
development challenges.
Ghana‟s education sector is facing many challenges. The challenges include poor and
inadequate infrastructure, insufficient financing and shortage of teachers especially in the
rural areas. Within this spectrum of challenges, teacher shortage, which is largely associated
with low rate of teacher training and high level of teacher attrition, has been identified as one
of the most intractable problems facing the education system in Ghana.
7
Paradoxically, the Ghana‟s educational system has seen several reforms since independence
and many of these reforms have sought to increase the number of teachers trained and
retained in the classrooms. Among these measures was the payment of allowances to teacher
trainees to motivate more people to enroll in teacher training institutions. These measures
have, in the past, resulted in high turnout rate from the teacher training colleges. But the
teacher attrition rate has been equally high.
The high rate of teacher attrition has been attributed to several factors. Key among them is the
poor working conditions for teachers. Teachers in Ghana are among the poorly paid in the
public service. In addition, teachers in Ghana especially those working in rural and deprived
communities work under very difficult social and economic conditions. These communities
often lack all the basic necessities of life such as potable water, electricity and health facilities
among others. Teachers in such deprived communities generally have very little opportunity
for self-development and the development of their children. They are sometimes compelled to
work long hours and engage in multiple tasks. Support and supervision services are lacking
and facilities and resources for effective teaching are usually are not available to them.
The low level of salaries and the poor working conditions have contributed to the low status
of teachers in society. This has considerably reduced morale in the teaching profession and
diminished its appeal. The poor working conditions often force teachers to hold multiple jobs
which in turn negatively influence the quality of teaching. As the working conditions and the
status of teachers keep falling, the number of teachers leaving the classrooms for greener
pastures rises.
The low level of literacy and numeracy among the Ghanaian population is partly a reflection
of teacher attrition in the country. Part of the problem is that the interventions in the
educational system aimed at keeping teachers in the classroom have often been based on the
advice of so-called experts who may know very little about the challenges facing the
educational system in Ghana. The views of teachers who are at the centre of the educational
system are hardly taken into account. The result is that teachers continue to leave the
classrooms even as more initiatives and measures are being implemented.
8
It was against this background that this survey was conducted to solicit the views of teachers
and educational workers on teacher attrition in Ghana. Hopefully, the views of teachers
contained in this report will be taken into account in the formulation of new initiatives and
interventions to deal with the high rate of teacher attrition in Ghana.
The rest of the report is organized as follows: Section 2 provides detailed background
information of the education system in Ghana. Section 3 reviews the literature on teacher
attrition. Section 4 presents the findings of the survey. Section 5 is the conclusion.
9
SECTION 2
2.0 Background Information
2.1 Education in the Colonial Era
At independence Ghana had a relatively good educational system. The only weakness of that
system was its huge colonial imprints. That system was criticized for not being responsive
enough to the unique developmental challenges that faced the country at the time. This
necessitated the need for major reforms so that education at all levels would meet the
developmental aspirations of the country.
Formal education in Ghana dates back to 1592. The current educational system is therefore an
outcome of several decades of transformation from a structure inherited from the missionaries
and the British colonial administration.
During the colonial period, the focus of education was on spreading the gospel and creating
an elite group to run the colony. As was the case in many other colonies, education in the
Gold Coast began with colonial administrators and the merchants setting up schools in their
forts and castles to educate the children (mulatto) they have had with native women. Christian
missionaries were very instrumental in the introduction of formal education in Ghana. They
needed well-educated local assistants to spread the gospel.
By 1874, before the British took full authority of the Gold Coast as crown colony, the
missionaries had already established a number of mission schools particularly in the southern
part of the country. For instance, by 1881, more than 139 schools had been established with
an enrolment of about 5,000 students. Thirteen years later, the Basel missionaries established
a Teacher Training College, 3 grammar schools, 7 boarding schools and 98 day schools.
During that period, there was a wide variation in the educational system in terms of
curriculum and management of the schools. This prompted the authorities to draw up plans in
10
1882 to guide or standardize educational development in the country1. As a result, the
proposed targets2 for the development of education were set in 1918 by Sir Hugh Clifford.
They included the following:
Primary education for every African boy and girl;
Improved salaries for teachers; and
A Training College for teachers in every province;
A Royal College
To improve access to education, the authorities instituted a poll tax in 1852 to expand
educational facilities. But the measure became unpopular and was abolished after nine years
of its implementation. Several industrial schools were established, focusing on technical and
agricultural education. At the Prince of Wales College scholarships were awarded to students
to continue their studies in British universities. A separate department of education was
created to take charge of education in the neglected northern territories.
In the early part of the 1930s emphasis was placed on the training of teachers by the
government. This additional impetus to education development can be traced to Governor
Guggisberg‟s ten-year Development Plan, announced in 1919, in which education was given a
special place. His policies did not only stress the need for improved teacher training,
vocational training, and equal education for girls but also Europeans were replaced with welleducated Africans in many administrative setups in the Gold Coast. Even though English
remained the principal language of instruction in the school system, local languages
(vernacular) were also allowed in primary schools. Textbooks were published in some local
languages.
It is clear from the foregoing that the colonial administration laid a solid foundation for the
development of formal education in Ghana. By the 1950s there were about 3000 primary and
An inspector of schools was installed from 1887 to 1890, and later an office of the Director of
Education was created to inspect schools and to standardize their management
1
The proposed targets and recommendations from several committee’s such as “the PhelpsStokes Fund” from America and the “1922 committee” led to the opening of the Prince of
Wales College (later Achimota College) in 1927
2
11
secondary schools in Ghana and about seven percent of the population of 4.2 million was in
school.
2.2 Education in the Post-Independence Era
Post independence education was given a further boost by the Nkrumah Government.
Nkrumah saw education as the key to national development. Nkrumah introduced the policy
of education for all. Basic education was made free and compulsory by the Education Act,
1961 (Act 87) which made education compulsory and free. There were free textbooks for all
students and local education authorities were created and charged with the responsibility for
buildings, equipment and maintenance for primary schools (Asiedu-Akrofi, 1982, p. 100).
The objective was to bring about Free Universal Primary Education (FUPE).
The pre-university system of education at this period was structured as follows: 6 years of
primary education; 4 years of middle level education; 5 years of secondary education and 2
years of sixth form education (i.e., the 6-4-5-2 system). This was followed by three years of
university education for those who qualified to enter the university. Students, who could not
qualify for sixth form, could proceed to do two years of pre-vocational or three years of
training college.
There was a dramatic increase in the number of elementary and secondary schools as well as
in enrolment during the reign of Kwame Nkrumah. Between 1951 and 1961, the number of
schools had increased from 571,580 to 875,980 (a 53 percent increase). Within the same
period the number of secondary schools increased almost six-fold from 12 to 68, while the
number of training colleges nearly doubled
from 19 to 32. Primary and middle schools
together increased fivefold from 1,592 to 7,660. The phenomenal growth in the number of
schools led to an equally phenomenal increase in school enrolment. For instance, in 1961, the
total enrolment for secondary schools and training colleges were 19,143 and 4,552
respectively. As shown in Table 2, there was improvement in enrolment at all the levels
between 1950s and 60s.
12
Table 1 School enrolment levels from 1951-1970
Level of education
1951
1961
1970
Primary Schools
154,360
481,500
975,629
Middle Schools
66,175
160,000
424,430
Secondary/Technical
3,559
19,143
46,213
Teacher Training Colleges
1,916
4,552
N/A
University
208
1,204
N/A
Total
226,218
666,399
1,446,272
Source: Nkrumah (1967) and Ministry of Education
But the system of education was said to be too long and academic. These concerns led to
some educational reforms in 1974 with the introduction of the Junior Secondary Schools
(JSS). The JSS brought with it practical subjects allowing students to acquire occupational
skills. The JSS system started on a trial basis and never survived the experimental phase due
to a number of challenges. The challenges included the severe economic decline in the 1970s,
bureaucracy and sheer lack of political interests in the system. Between the mid 1970s and the
early 1980s the Ghana education system was in a state of crisis and had began to slip slowly
into decline prompting several commissions of inquiry3. Apart from disruptions by military
coups, the system was challenged with drastic reduction in government financing, lack of
educational materials, deterioration of educational infrastructure, low enrolment levels and
high dropout rates. According to the World Bank (2004: 7), between 1976 and 1983, Ghana‟s
education sector budget as a share of GDP, declined from 6.4 to 1.4 percent. The poor
conditions at home led to a large scale exodus of qualified teachers to Nigeria where new
found oil wealth was funding a rapid expansion of basic education. Consequently, untrained
teachers filled the places of those who left. According to Colclough with Lewin, (1993) there
was a steady fall in gross enrolment ratios from 80 percent in 1980 to 70 percent in 1987.
A notable one is the Dzobo Education Review Commission set up to determine the causes and way
forward for recovery
3
13
In 1987, education was further reformed4 based largely on the recommendations of the Dzobo
Commission and with assistance from various development partners such as the World Bank
and UK Department for International Development (DfID) The 1987 reform which formed
part of the economy recovery programme (ERP) described as one of the most ambitious
programmes of educational reforms in sub-Saharan Africa. The 1987 reforms re-introduced
the Junior Secondary School system and made it a nationwide educational system and
replaced the 6-4-5-2 pre-tertiary school system with 6-3-3 (i.e., 6 years of primary education,
3 years of junior secondary and 3 years of senior secondary) thus shortening pre-tertiary
education from 17 to 12 years.
In 1996, ten years after the implementation of the new system, government introduced an
education sector policy known as “Free Compulsory Universal Basic Education (FCUBE)”.
The FCUBE programme was an effort to ensure that all school-age children received free
quality basic education. The FCUBE created the framework for donor support to education
through a coordinated sector programme, and brought about educational decentralization with
greater recognition of the important role of community participation in the management of
schools through School Management Committees (SMCs) and Parent-Teacher Associations
(PTAs).
Thus, there have been three major educational reforms in the post-independence era - 1961,
1967 and 1987. There have also been several reviews of the education system. They include
the reviews in 1966, 1974, 1993, 2002 and the most recent one in 2008. Major educational
reforms and reviews, policy initiatives, and laws in the education sector include:
The education Act of 1961;
The New Structure and Content of Education 1974;
The Free Compulsory Universal Basic Education Programme, 1996-2005;
The Dzobo report of 1973( The Committee recommended the JSS system);
The Education Reform Programme 1987/88;
The Ghana Education Trust Fund - GET Fund Act 2000 (Act 581);
Some of the objectives of the reforms were to increase access to basic education, make
education cost-effective, and shorten the pre-university educational structure from 17years to
12 years as well as improve quality of education.
4
14
The Capitation Grant and School Feeding programme; and
Ghana Education Reform 2008
2.3 Current State of Education in Ghana
Currently, Ghana has the 6-3-3 pre-tertiary system (i.e., 6 years of primary education, 3 years
of Junior High School education, 3 years of Senior High School education) and 4 years of
University (Bachelor‟s) education. Students who pass the SSS examination can also pursue
courses at the polytechnics, teacher training colleges and other tertiary institutions.
The search for an „ideal‟ education system for Ghana has, however, remained elusive. The
government of Ghana, under the leadership of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) proposed
changes in the education system in August 2007. A new 6-3-4 pre-tertiary system was
introduced in 2008 (i.e., 6 years of primary; 3 years of Junior High School and 3 years of
Senior High School). Key among the reforms was the shift from 3 to 4 years of secondary
education as well the focus on technical and vocational education. But these changes were
reversed by the NDC Government in 2009 even before they were implemented.
Broadly, the existing national educational system is made up of two components: Pre- tertiary
and higher education. The pre-tertiary education is sub-divided into: pre-school education
(below 6 years); primary education (6-12years); junior secondary education (13 years and
above); and senior secondary/technical/vocational education.
As the foregoing shows, the education system in Ghana has undergone many changes since
independence. The last two decades alone have witnessed series of initiatives with the support
of some development partners. These initiatives have all aimed at addressing inequities in the
educational system and to improve overall quality of educational outcomes5. While a number
of policy reforms and interventions (e.g., capitation grant, school feeding and Free
5
The Education Strategic Plan (ESP) is planned for the period 2003 - 2015. The Plan is based on the
Poverty Reduction Strategy and operates within the framework of a sector-wide approach to education
and a roadmap for achieving the education related MDG‟s. The ESP has four „pillars‟: (1) Equitable
Access to Education, (2) Quality of Education, (3) Educational Management and (4) Science,
Technology and Technical and Vocational education (TVET). The ESP aims at increasing access to
and participation in education and training, improving the quality of teaching and learning for
enhanced pupil/student achievement.
15
Compulsory Universal Basic Education (FCUBE) have improved access to education for the
school-age population across the country, instructional quality, student achievement, teacher
motivation and retention remain critical challenges.
Over the last decade, there has been some improvement in physical infrastructure for schools.
Enrolment at most levels has also increased significantly partly as a result of some of these
policies and interventions. For instance, between 2003 and 2006 the Gross Enrollment Rate
(GER) at the primary school level increased from 87 percent to 92 percent. Gross enrollment
at the secondary level increased from 73 percent to 77 percent. Currently (in 2009), the gross
enrolment at the primary level stands at about 95 percent. Net enrolment rate (NER) has also
witnessed significant improvements in the past two decades. Table 2 below shows GER and
NER in Ghana for the period between 2003 and 2008.
Table 2 Gross Enrolment Rates (GER) for 2003/2004 to 2005/2006 & Net
Enrolment Rates (NER) in Primary Schools (2004/05 to 2007/08)
GER (%)
Year
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2007/08
Total
86.5
87.5
92.1
95.0
Boys
89.5
90.5
95.3
97.1
Girls
83.1
84.0
88.8
92.8
NER Statistics in Primary Schools
2004/05
2005/06
2007/08
Pop 6-11 yrs
3,518,468
3,593,027
3,817,555
P1-6 enrolment(6-11 yrs)
2,079,786
2,484,855
3,156,731
NER
59.1
69.2
82.9
Source: Ghana, Ministry of Education, Science and Sports: Preliminary Education Sector
Performance Report 2006, 2008
16
Despite the increase in physical infrastructure6 (i.e., the number of educational institutions)
and improved access to education, the critical issue has always been inadequate resources for
the education sector7. Schools at all levels of education continue to lack the very basic and
essential inputs such as textbooks which are necessary for effective teaching and learning.
School buildings and their contents – furniture and equipment – are often left in dilapidated
conditions. Above all, the poor teacher motivation and shortage of teachers still exist at all the
levels of education.
The proportion of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) devoted to education declined from 6.4
percent in 1976 to about 1.0 percent in 1983 before increasing to 1.7 percent in 1985 (World
Bank, 1996). But the situation has improved significantly after the 1987 educational reform
which was considered as the most fundamental reform ever undertaken in the educational
system after independence. For instance, for the period between 2000 and 2005, public
expenditure on education increased from 3.8 percent of GDP 5.6 percent. In 2006, central
government allocation to the education sector increased further to 7.2 percent of GDP but fell
to 5.9 percent in 2008.
Government‟s desire for improved educational outcome is also reflected in the increased
resource allocations to the education sector compared to other sectors. With regards to the
overall social expenditure, the education sector consumes over 60 percent of that budget as
shown in the last column in Table 3 below.
6
Currently, Ghana has over 41,000 pre-tertiary schools: 30,562 primary schools, 10,213 Junior High
Schools and 646 Senior High Schools. There are 38 teacher training colleges nationwide with at least
one in each region. There are 10 Polytechnics (one in each region), 7 public universities and over 20
affiliated private universities.
7
This is in spite of that fact that more than a quarter of the national budget is devoted to education
17
Table 3 Trend in Public Expenditure on Education from 2000-2008 (GHC Millions)
Year
Expenditure on
Education*
Nominal GDP
Total Social Sector
Expenditure (SSE)
103.3
2,715.2
147.6
2000
142.0
3,801.4
191.0
2001
180.0
4,776.4
258.8
2002
277.6
6,526.2
406.9
2003
346.6
7,980.4
504.8
2004
9,701.8
570.5
2005
827.9
11,490.3
1,330.0
2006
1,132.2
16,295.8
1,721.1
2007
1,264.9
21.6b
2,043.4
2008
Note: Budget Allocations is a proxy for expenditure.
Source: Budget Statement & Economic Policy of the GoG, 2001-2009.
Education
Expenditure/
GDP
Ratio
3.8
3.7
3.8
4.3
4.3
5.6
7.2
6.9
5.9
The increases in overall educational expenditure and in school enrolments are
Expenditure/
Social Sector
Expenditure
Ratio
69.98
74.35
69.55
68.22
68.66
NA
62.25
65.78
61.90
desirable in
terms of moving the country towards meeting its objective of providing universal basic
education for all Ghanaian children of school-going age by 2015. However, the increased
expenditure and the enrolment figures have not reflected sufficiently (if any) in educational
outcomes. For instance, the ever-increasing educational budget has not impacted much on the
pay levels and general working conditions of teachers. This has contributed significantly to
the high rate of teacher attrition. Those who have been trained at great expense to the taxpayer
continue to leave the classrooms because of the lack of motivation for teachers.
With an estimated population of 23 million people (with more than half aged below the age of
15), Ghana currently can boast of less than 200,000 teachers (GES, 2009). This number is
grossly inadequate to cater for the growing enrolment figures made possible by the various
interventions mentioned above. The proportion of unqualified teachers in Ghana is still very
high. But these unqualified teachers are needed to make up for the shortfall in the number of
qualified teachers.
The Ghana Education Service (GES) estimates that about 10,000 teachers leave the classroom
yearly for various reasons8. According to the Ghana Education Service, the number of
GES define attrition or turnover broadly to involve the following: (i) teachers who leave with
permission for study leave with or without pay (who may not return); (ii) teachers out of the
8
18
teachers that go on study leave annually has also been on the rise. About 3000 teachers leave
the classroom to pursue further studies. Pupil-teacher ratio has been around 30 since 2000. In
the 2007/08 academic year, for example, the pupil-teacher ratio was 34 for the primary level
and 19 for the secondary level. Table 4 (below) shows the distribution of teaching and nonteaching staff by region in 2009.
Table 4 Teaching Staff (TS) and Non-Teaching Staff (NTS) Status by Region
Region
Teaching Staff
Ashanti
Brong Ahafo
Central
Eastern
Greater Accra
Northern
Upper East
Upper West
Volta
Western
Total
Source: GES, HQ 2009
42,229
Non-Teaching
Staff
15,701
Total
57,930
21,496
25,410
26,467
15,696
17,229
7,792
5,517
19,029
17,538
198,403
6,856
8,475
10,618
8,138
5,165
3,453
2,351
6,563
5,052
72,372
28,352
33,885
37,085
23,834
22,394
11,245
7,868
25,592
22,590
270,775
classroom on secondment; (iii) teachers retiring; and (iv)teachers just leaving to take up non-teaching
jobs.
19
SECTION 3
3.1: Teacher Attrition: A Review of the Literature
The phenomenon of teacher attrition has been a worry to school authorities and policy makers
in both developed and developing countries. In response, substantial research has been carried
out on this subject to explore the causes and the attendant implications. Several causes of
teacher attrition have been identified in the literature. Some empirical work has shown that
one of the causes of the high rate of teacher attrition is the level and type of human capital
accumulated by teachers. For instance, studies (summarized in Guarino, Santibañez, Daley, &
Brewer, 2004 p. 34), show that teachers with advanced degrees from prestigious colleges or
teachers with degrees in “high market-value” subjects such as mathematics, engineering and
science typically leave teaching for jobs in other, non-education fields at higher rates than do
their colleagues without these educational qualities. For such teachers, the opportunity cost of
staying in the classroom is higher than they are for teachers with skills and knowledge less
well-rewarding outside the teaching profession.
Other studies have shown that attrition can be divided into several types, each affected
differently by human capital and by social capital. Some teachers leave fulltime classroom
teaching either for jobs in unrelated fields or they depart the workforce all together.
According to Ingersoll, (2001, 2003) others can remain working as teachers, but “migrate” to
other schools. It is also argued that others may still leave the classroom temporarily, perhaps
to have children, and then return to the classroom after a hiatus (Murnane, Singer, Willett,
Kemple et al., 1991). Yet some teachers leave for different jobs in the field of education
(Anderson & Olsen, 2005).
Retirement is naturally assumed to be one of the primary reasons for teacher attrition. But
research has shown that the number of teachers retiring from the profession is not a leading
cause. In a study of teacher turnover by Richard M. Ingersoll (2003.), retirement was cited
less often for leaving the teaching profession than „job dissatisfaction‟ or „to pursue another
job‟. Thus, great number of teachers leave the profession altogether because they see no hope
for change.
20
Job satisfaction or dissatisfaction is often cited and rendered important in both research on
teacher attrition and teacher retention (Stockard & Lehman, 2004). Connolly, 2000; Ingersoll,
2003; Ingersoll & Smith, 2003; Heller, 2004; Stockard & Lehman, 2004 tried to understand
the high teacher turnover rate among „beginning teachers‟ by investigating the reasons and
causes behind both teacher retention and teacher attrition. They found that the common
problems identified by the majority of teachers include:
job dissatisfaction;
inadequate support from parents, administration, colleagues and the public;
increasing class sizes (leading to increased in workloads);
poor working conditions and low salary;
discipline, management, and attendance problems;
poor motivation of students; and
lack of space for teachers to participate in key decisions affecting the school.
Particularly on the poor salary, studies by Brewer (1996) confirmed that higher wages reduce
teacher quit propensity. The researchers therefore offer suggestions on school policies, school
administration, and mentoring programs between senior teachers and novice teachers.
Another group of researchers examine the extent to which teacher-principal relationships and
interpersonal competence affect their job satisfaction (Roach, 1991). Regarding the leadership
styles and the roles of principals or headmasters, research reveals that the principal‟s affinityseeking strategies and cooperation with teachers improve the interpersonal relationships
between principals and their teachers, and that teacher job satisfaction is strongly associated
with teachers‟ perceptions of their principals‟ leadership styles and decision-making
strategies.
Another important finding has been that teachers‟ decisions whether to stay or leave the
teaching profession are highly influenced by their age. The relationship between teachers‟
age/experience and their turnover has been found to follow a U-shaped curve. This means the
rate of teacher attrition is high among young teachers; it stabilizes through the mid-career
period and rise again before retirement years (among those with longer years of experience in
21
the teaching profession). Although there is some disagreement as to why this is the case,
researchers have consistently found that younger teachers have very high rates of departure.
Subsequently, as those remaining “settle in,” turnover rates decline through the mid-career
period and, finally, rise again in the retirement years (e.g., Bobbitt et al., 1994; Grissmer &
Kirby, 1987, 1992, 1997). Moreover, because the distribution of the age of teachers is skewed
upward (i.e., older teachers significantly outnumber younger teachers) many analysts have
concluded that retirement due to a rapidly “graying” teaching workforce is the most
significant factor behind teacher turnover, teacher shortages, and school staffing problems
(e.g., Grissmer & Kirby, 1997).
But there is overwhelming evidence in contemporary educational research that the main
factors that affect teacher attrition are job satisfaction, salary levels, basic working conditions
(including class size, facilities, and availability of textbooks), and teachers‟ relationships with
each other and their principal. These, in combination with other factors, influence teachers‟
decisions to stay in a school or to leave.
22
SECTION 4
Survey Results
4.1 Data
As mentioned in the introductory section, data were gathered through a questionnaire survey.
A thousand questionnaires were distributed to teachers in all the ten administrative regions in
Ghana. Out of the thousand questionnaires 890 were completed and returned. The survey
results presented in this section are, therefore, based on the data gathered from the 890
questionnaires. Table 5 below shows the distribution of the completed questionnaires by
region.
Table 5 Distribution of Survey Questionnaires Completed & Returned by Region
Region
Western
Central
Accra
Eastern
Volta
Ashanti
Brong Ahafo
Northern
Upper West
Upper East
Total
Total Number of
Questionnaires completed &
returned
Percent (%)of Total
Questionnaires Returned
85
137
93
121
91
123
94
85
32
29
890
9.6
15.4
10.4
13.6
10.2
13.8
10.6
9.6
3.6
3.3
100
Source: Survey Data
The questionnaire was divided into four sections as follows: Section A deal with
general/personal information on respondents including location, sex, rank, age, marital status,
number of children, number of dependants, etc); Section B gathered information on
respondents‟ educational qualification; Section C covered issues relating to employment,
work experience and job satisfaction. The fourth section (Section D) was designed to solicit
ideas on how to reduce teacher attrition in Ghana.
23
4.2 Key Findings from the Survey
4.2.1 Demographic Profile of Respondents
The majority (60%) of the respondents were between the ages of 36 and 60 years. The rest
(40%) were between the ages of 15 and 35 years. As shown in Table 6 below, only one
percent of the respondents fall into the youth category (i.e. 15-24 years). In terms of the
distribution of the sample by sex, about two thirds were males and one third of the
respondents were females. Nearly three quarters of the respondents were married and a fifth
reported that they were single (Table 7). Just about 70 percent of the respondents have
between one and three children (Table 8).
Table 6 Age distribution of Respondents
Age
Frequency
Percentage
Youth (15 – 24 years)
13
1.6
Young People (25-35)
307
38.9
Adults (36-60)
470
59.5
Total
785
100
Source: Survey Data
Table 7 Marital Status of Respondents
Marital Status
Frequency
Percentage
Married
657
74.8
Single
185
21.2
Divorced
12
1.4
Widowed
16
1.8
Other
7
0.8
Total
877
100
Source: Survey Data
24
Table 8 Number of Children of Respondents
Number of Children
1
2
3
4
5
6
7+
Total
Frequency
122
196
157
109
55
18
19
676
Valid Percentage
18
29
23.2
16.1
8.1
2.7
2.9
100
Source: Survey Data
4.2.2 Educational Qualification and Professional Status
A little over half of the respondents reported that they hold first degree as shown in Table 9.
About a fifth holds Diploma in Education; and about 19 percent hold certificates A or B. Just
a few of them hold GCE „O‟ level or SSS (1.4%) and master‟s degree (3%). Almost all the
respondents (95%) are professional teachers (Table 10). A very large majority of the
respondents (90%) reported that they intend to further their education at the tertiary level
ranging from bachelors to doctorate degrees (Table 9).
Table 9 Respondents’ current levels of Qualification
Qualification
Frequency
GCE „O‟ Level
SSS Certificate
Teachers‟ Certificate A
Teachers‟ Certificate B
Diploma in Education
Bachelor‟s Degree
Masters Degree
Other Qualification
Total
Source: Survey data
Percentage
7
5
162
5
185
447
26
32
869
0.8
0.6
18.7
0.6
21.3
51.3
3.0
3.7
100
Table 10 Professional Status of Respondents
Frequency
Percentage
Professional teacher
837
95.1
Non-professional
42
4.9
Total
880
100.0
Source: Survey data
25
4.2.3
Teacher Attrition
The primary purpose of the study was to gather information on teacher attrition. Since our
respondents were teachers who are still in the teaching profession, the questionnaire were
designed to find out what could be the possible reasons for them to leave the teaching
profession for other „more lucrative‟ jobs in other sectors.
The questions to solicit this information focused on four main themes namely:
(1) Plans for further education
(2) Plans after further education
(3) Wage levels and access to non-wage benefits and
(4) Job satisfaction.
4.2.4 Plans for further education
Our analysis shows that the majority (90%) of the respondents intended to further their
education (Table 11). This is an indication that most teachers want to acquire higher
knowledge which may have positive effects on the quality of education. However, it may also
be an indication of the rate at which teachers want to leave the classroom (even if for a short
period). As discussed below, most teachers want to pursue higher education in the universities
either for bachelor‟s degree or for a higher qualification. This implies that teachers who
pursue further education on full time basis are likely to stay out of the classroom for between
two and five years depending on the course of study.
Table 11 Plans to Further Education
Do you intend to further your
education
Yes
No
Total
Source: Survey Data
Frequency
Valid Percentage
783
85
868
90.2
0.8
100
However, it is interesting to note that nearly 44 percent of the respondents said they intend to
pursue higher education in the same field (i.e., the education field); 11.2 percent in general
arts; 13.3 percent in science; 4.5 percent in technical and 18.5 percent in business; 3 percent in
home economics and 6 percent in other fields (see Table 12). The majority (68.2%) intend to
apply for a “study leave with pay” to go for further studies. Again, this is an indication (albeit
26
a weak indication) that the majority of the teachers are likely to return to the classroom when
properly motivated (Table 14).
Table 12 Preferred Field of Study for Further Education
Preferred Field of Study
Education
General Arts
Science
Technical
Business
Home Economics
Other
Total
Source: Survey Data
Frequency
338
87
103
35
144
23
47
777
Valid Percentage
43.5
11.2
13.3
4.5
18.5
3
6
100
Table 13 Table 4.8: Plans to apply for Study Leave with Pay
Do you plan to apply for Frequency
study leave with pay?
YES
NO
Total
512
238
750
Valid Percentage
68.3
31.7
100
Source: Survey Data
Approximately half (50.2%) of the respondents reported that they want to further their
education “to gain knowledge in my field”; Just about 6% reported that they want to further
their education so that they can leave the class for another job in the education sector; 17%
intend to pursue further education so that they can be promoted to higher ranks in the teaching
profession; 22.4% want to pursue further education to enable them to leave the teaching
profession for other professions (see Table 14below).
Table 14 Reasons for Further Education
Reason
Frequency
To gain further knowledge in my field
To enable me leave the classroom for another job in the education sector
For promotion to higher ranks in the teaching profession
To enable me to leave the teaching profession for another job
Other reasons
Total
392
48
135
175
31
781
Valid
Percentage
50.2
6.1
17.3
22.4
4.0
100
Source: Survey Data
27
4.2.5 Plans after further Education
To the question “Do you intend to return to the classroom/teaching profession after further
studies?” 64% of the respondents said “YES”. This is an indication that the majority of
teachers may remain in the teaching field if they are adequately motivated (see Table 15). But
over a third (35.6%) of teachers would like to leave the teaching profession for other sectors.
Table 15 Plans after further education
Do you intend to return to the classroom
or teaching profession?
YES
NO
Total
Source: Survey Data
Frequency
Valid Percentage
502
275
777
64.4
35.6
100
The respondents who do not intend to return to the teaching profession after further education
were asked to indicate what sector they intend to move to. The results show that about 60% of
them would want to take a job either in the finance sector or in the community, social and
personal sectors. The remaining 40% are distributed fairly across the other major economic
sectors as shown in Table 16 except for the transport sector where only one percent of the
respondents indicated that they would prefer to work after their further education.
The preferred alternative occupations/professions mentioned included accounting, finance,
banking, human resource management, administration, advertising, agriculture, animal
husbandry, social work, the army, civil service, building contractor, business, community
development, civil engineering, trade, catering, information and communication technology,
construction, consultancy, manufacturing, journalism, insurance, university lecturer,
medicine, NGO, mining engineering, musician, public relations, politics, nutritionist,
research, self-employment, statistician, waste management, and sports.
28
Table 16 Preferred Sector of Employment after further education for those who will not
return to the Classroom
Economic Sector
Agriculture
Manufacturing
Mining
Utilities
Construction
Trade
Transport
Finance
Community & Personal
Services
Total
Frequency
29
24
22
18
19
27
4
105
111
Valid Percent
8.1
6.7
6.1
5.0
5.3
7.5
1.1
29.2
30.9
359
100
Source: Survey data
Responses to further questions relating to attrition indicated that as high as half of the teachers
would like to quit the teaching profession before they retire at the age of 60 years. In response
to a specific question: “Do you have plans to leave the teaching profession before you retire
at the age of 60 years?” 50% of the respondents said they would leave before they retire. The
reasons they gave for their plans to leave the teaching profession included the following:
-
For higher pay (24.8%)
For improved conditions of service (59.8%)
I just want to change profession (6.5%)
Other reasons (8.9%)
29
As we can see from the responses outlined above, a higher proportion of teachers care more
about improved working conditions (almost 60%) compared to those who would like to quit
for higher pay (about 25%).
The majority of the respondents (84.5%) indicated that they have never taken any job apart
from teaching. That means just about 15% have had some experience in other professions (see
Table 17 below).
Table 17 Work Experience in other Professions
Have you taken another job
in your working life apart
from teaching?
YES
NO
Total
Source: Survey data
Frequency
Valid Percent
131
715
846
15.5%
84.5
100
4.2.6 Wages
As discussed earlier in the literature review in Section 3, low wage has been identified as one
of the reasons why teachers leave the teaching profession for „greener pastures‟ in other
sectors. Reasonable level of wages is an important instrument for motivating teachers to
remain in the classroom. But teachers in Ghana earn relatively low salaries compared to their
counterparts in other African countries and those holding comparable qualifications/positions
in other sectors of the economy.
The gross monthly salaries reported by the respondents ranged from GH¢74 (US$52)9 to
GH¢831(US$589). As shown in Table 4.13, 80% of the respondents earn GH¢500
(approximately US$354) per month or lower. The average gross monthly salary was GH¢405
(or approximately US$ 287 per month in 2009).
9
The average exchange rate in 2009 was GH¢1.41 to US$1 in 2009.
30
Table 18 Gross Monthly Wages
Gross Monthly Wage(GH¢)
Below 100
101 - 200
201 - 300
301 - 400
401 - 500
501 - 600
601 - 700
700+
Total
Source: Survey data
Percent
0.9
1.8
23.3
18.2
36.2
11.7
5.6
2.3
100
Wages and benefits play important role in staff retention especially in developing countries
like Ghana. The survey respondents were asked to indicate whether they are satisfied with
their salary or not. As shown in Table 19 below 98 percent said they were dissatisfied with
their current salaries. The following statements were used to describe salaries in the teaching
profession:
“The take home salary cannot take me home”
“The level of inflation erodes the value of our earnings”
The salary cannot pay children’s school fees and meet other household expenditure”
“The salary cannot make ends meet”
“The salary cannot afford me three square meals, descent accommodation and
transport cost in a month. I am heavily indebted”
I struggle to save towards the future, because the salary is meager”, among others,
were stated.
“The salary does not commensurate my qualification and workload”,
“My colleagues in other sectors are earning higher”.
Table 19 Satisfaction with Pay
Frequency
Percentage
Yes
15
1.8
No
834
98.2
Total
849
100.0
Source: Survey data
31
4.2.7 Access to Benefits
Non-wage benefits are essential components of the reward system in Ghana. Some of these
benefits are statutory. These include social security contribution, annual leave and maternity.
Other benefits such as free or subsidized transport, free or subsidized housing, interest free
loans, and medical care are usually negotiated between workers or unions and employers in
both the public and private sectors.
Respondents were asked to indicate whether or not they have access to selected benefits (both
the statutory and non-statutory benefits). The results are presented in Tables 20, 21, and 22
(for some statutory benefits).
Table 20 Access to Social Security
Access to Social Security
Frequency
Valid Percent
YES
703
81.3%
NO
162
18.7%
Total
865
100
Source: Survey data
Table 21 Access to Paid Annual Leave
Access to Paid Annual
Leave
YES
NO
Total
Source: Survey data
Frequency
Valid Percent
119
753
872
13.7
86.3
100
Table 22 Access to Paid Sick Leave
Access to Sick Leave
YES
NO
Total
Source: Survey data
Frequency
384
423
807
Valid Percent
47.7
52.3
100
As shown in the tables above, over 80% of the teachers said they have access to social
security (Table 20); about 14% have access to paid annual leave (Table 21); approximately
32
48% said they have access to sick leave (Table 22). It is important to note the small
percentage of teachers who have access to annual leave. Unlike other categories of workers
teachers leave coincide with school vacations. It is also important to note that the Ghana
Education Service has a study leave policy for all employees/teachers in the Service subject
to some conditions. The conditions include the number of years in service and the chosen
field of study as well as the current station of the employee (rural or urban). The policy seeks
to support teachers to pursue courses of direct relevance to the education sector but most
importantly for the upgrading of knowledge.
It is presumed that teachers who pursue further studies in education-related subjects are likely
to return to the classroom compared to those who opt for banking and finance, for example.
Nearly 46% of teachers covered by this survey indicated that they have benefited from study
leave with full pay and 60% said they are entitled to study leave with pay.
Apart from study leave with pay teachers‟ access to other non-statutory benefit is quite poor.
As shown in table 4.17 only 7% of the respondents said they have access to free/subsidized
transport; 7% has access to child care services; 11% have access to subsidized/free housing;
and 14% have access to medical care.
Table 23 Access to Selected Non-Statutory Benefits
Type of Benefit
Free or Subsidized Transport
Free or Subsidized Housing
Medical Care
Child Care
Entitled to Paid Study Leave
Have benefited from Study Leave with pay
YES (%)
7
11
14
7
60
46
NO (%)
93
89
86
93
40
54
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
Source: Survey data
4.2.8 Job Satisfaction
Employee retention and job satisfaction are closely linked. Studies have established that pay
and benefits, communication motivation, justice and leisure time, all seem to play part to
whether employees are satisfied with their jobs or not (see Brewer, 2000; Kirby, 2000; and
Tristram, 2000),
33
In this survey, respondents were asked, first, to indicate whether or not they are satisfied with
their job as a teacher and to indicate the degree of satisfaction. The results are presented in
Tables 4.18 and 4.19 below. As shown in Table 4.19 and 4.20 nearly three quarters (72%) of
the teachers said they are either “Dissatisfied” (41%) or “Very Dissatisfied” (31%). The main
reasons for the dissatisfaction are the low level of wages and poor conditions of service in the
education sector.
It is therefore not surprising that when the teachers were asked to indicate whether they would
recommend the teaching profession to their children or relatives three–quarters (75%) said
“NO” (Table 26) .
Table 24 Are you satisfied with your work as a teacher
Responses
Frequency
Percentage
Yes
232
27
No
604
72
Total
836
100
Source: Survey Data
Table 25 Respondents’ levels of satisfaction with the teaching profession
Levels of satisfaction
Frequency
Percentage
Satisfied
183
22
Very satisfied
37
4
Dissatisfied
344
41
Very Dissatisfied
266
31
Not know /Indifferent
19
2
Total
849
100
Source: Survey data
Table 26 Would you recommend the teaching profession to your children or relatives
Frequency
Yes
Percentage
213
24.8
34
No
646
75.2
Total
859
100.0
35
SECTION 5
Conclusion and Recommendation
5.1 Conclusion
This study examined teacher attrition in Ghana. The main research question that guided the
study is: Why are teachers leaving the classroom? The two unions (GNAT and TEWU) which
sponsored the study recognize the role of formal education and teachers in the social and
economic development process. Attraction and retention of teachers in the classrooms are
therefore extremely important to achieve the noble goal of “Education for All”.
Previous studies have identified low pay and poor working conditions as two major factors
that are pushing teachers out of the classrooms. In Ghana teaching is regarded as a “low
status” profession due mainly to the low pay and the low living standards among teachers.
Our analysis confirmed that teachers generally earn low salaries. Some teachers who
participated in this survey reported salaries as low as GH¢74 (US$52) per month. The survey
respondents reported an average monthly salary of GH¢405 (or approximately US$ 287 per
month in 2009). It was therefore not surprising that 98% of the teachers covered by this
survey said they are not satisfied with their current pay.
With regard to benefits our analysis shows that, apart from paid study leave and social
security, teachers generally do not have access to other benefits such as medical care, free or
subsidized housing, child care services, and free or subsidized transport. Since paid study
leave remains the only benefit available to teachers many teachers take advantage of it. One in
ten of the teachers covered by this survey said they intend to further their education. The
reason commonly cited for the plans to further their education was “to acquire higher
knowledge”. But it may also be the case that it is an avenue available to teachers to take a
break from the poor working conditions in which they find themselves especially for those in
rural and deprived areas.
Depending on the course of study a teacher on study leave with full pay can stay out of the
classroom for between one and five years. This study shows that the majority (64%) of
36
teachers who further their education intend to return to the classroom. This is consistent with
our observation that many teachers use the study leave as an avenue to take a break from the
classroom and the poor working conditions. But it is also important to underscore our finding
that that over a third of teachers (36%) have plans to leave the classroom for other more
lucrative jobs after study leave either for higher pay, for improved conditions of service, or
just to change profession.
The low pay and poor working conditions act to lower morale among teachers. Seventy-two
percent of the respondents said they are either “dissatisfied” or “very dissatisfied” with their
job as a teacher and 75% said they will not recommend the teaching profession to their
children or their relatives.
GNAT and TEWU sponsored this survey with the aim of gathering information that can
provide the basis for engaging the relevant authorities in the educational sector to work
towards reducing the rate at which teachers are leaving the classrooms.
Some progress has been made in terms of growth in schools and access to education across
the country. This may be a reflection of Ghana Government‟s commitment to the achievement
of the “Education for All” initiative within the framework of the Growth and Poverty
Reduction Strategy. However, while policies, strategies and measures have improved access
to education and teachers‟ workloads have increased, teachers see no corresponding
improvement in their conditions of service. It is becoming a lot harder to retain teachers in the
service as the economy of Ghana grows and other social and economic sectors become more
competitive in terms of pay and other conditions of service.
The findings presented in this report should be useful in the formulation, implementation and
review of policies aimed at reducing teacher attrition in Ghana. It is only when the right
policies are implemented and appropriate measures are taken to attract and retain teachers in
the classroom that Ghana can meet the noble goal of “Educational for All”.
5.2 Recommendations
37
Given the level of teacher dissatisfaction with the teaching profession as shown by the result
of this survey, reversing the current trend of teacher attrition rate in Ghana and retaining
teachers in the classrooms will be a daunting task. However if the goal of “Education for All”
in Ghana is to be achieved, stakeholders in education must adopt and implement measures
that in the short to medium term will reverse the current rate at which teachers are leaving the
classrooms.
This survey has shown that the educational authorities have been fantastic in attracting young
people to the teaching profession. The payment of allowances to the teacher-trainees and the
study leave with pay system has gone a long way to attract young and brilliant people to take
up teaching appointments. However, the authorities in the education sector have done very
little to ensure that teachers trained at the expense of the taxpayer are retained in the
classrooms to serve the purpose for which they were trained. It is instructive to note that the
Ghana Education Service has no policy on retaining teachers in the classrooms where they are
most needed.
This study recommends that government and for that matter the GES adopt a policy on the
retention of teachers in the classrooms. The policy should recognize that once teachers are
assisted through the „Study with Pay Programme‟ to pursue further studies, they (teachers)
become marketable and attractive to other sectors of the economy where remuneration is
better than in the teaching service. To retain such teachers in the classrooms, their pay and
other conditions of service must be raised to levels commensurate with their newly acquired
skills. It is not enough to assist teachers to acquire new skills but the ultimate should be to
have them well-trained and motivated. The „Study Leave with Pay‟ system must be
complemented by other policies that motivate teachers to stay in the classrooms.
Government must also work not only to improve the educational infrastructure in all parts of
the country but equally important are the social amenities particularly in rural and deprived
communities. Teachers are increasingly refusing postings to areas where social amenities are
poor or non-existent; where they have very limited opportunity for personal development.
Teachers who accept postings to such deprived communities do so only when all other
options including leaving the teaching profession have not worked.
38
While government makes the effort to improve facilities in all parts of the country, the
authorities may have to compensate teachers who accept to stay in deprived communities in a
more significant way. The current scheme of compensation appears not to be enticing enough.
For the scheme to work and for the education system to retain teachers in deprived
communities, those teachers must see significant differences between their pay and that of
other teachers.
It is also important that government and the GES fight the canker of low morale and high
dissatisfaction among teachers. It would be difficult to retain teachers in the classroom when
more than two-thirds of all teachers are dissatisfied with their work as teachers. As this survey
has shown, a greater source of dissatisfaction among teachers comes from their pay levels.
Nearly every teacher is dissatisfied with their pay levels. Raising the level of remuneration in
the teaching profession as a whole will be a huge asset in the fight against teacher
dissatisfaction and low morale. Significant improvement in teachers‟ pay will be the most
important step towards stemming the high rate of teacher attrition rate in Ghana.
Perhaps, addressing the problem of low morale within the teaching profession may require
more than mere increases in the teachers‟ pay. While low pay within the profession has
contributed significantly to lowering the status of teachers in society, the continued decline in
the status of teachers has assumed perceptive dimension. The standard or false assumption
that teachers are the worst paid not only in the public service but also in the country as a
whole appears to have taken hold for which teachers are actually leaving the classroom for
other professions that pay significantly lower than the teaching profession.
Dealing with this perception will be a crucial part of the fight to retain teachers in the
classroom. It will require sustained public education to counter the wrong perception not only
among teachers but equally importantly, among the public in general. The unions operating in
the education sector can play an important role in this direction. Specifically, they can use
their network of branches across the country to educate their members to change their
perception.
39
40
References
Abena. D. Oduro, (2000), Basic Education in Ghana in the Post-Reform Period.
Anderson, L., & Olsen, B. (2005). Studying the career pathways of urban teachers in Los Angeles:
Who stays, who leaves, who shifts into other urban education work? Los Angeles: Institute for
Democracy, Education and Access, Center X UCLA.
Bobbitt, S., Leich, M., Whitener, S., & Lynch, H. (1994). Characteristics of stayers, movers, and
leavers: Results from the teacher follow up survey, 1991-92. Washington, DC: National Center for
Education Statistics.
Brewer, D. J. (1996). Career paths and quit decisions: evidence from teaching. Journal of Labor
Economics, 14(2), 313–339, Development Data Group, The World bank, 2008
Grissmer, D., & Kirby, S. (1987). Teacher attrition: The uphill climb to staff the nation’s Schools.
Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Grissmer, D., & Kirby, S. (1992). Patterns of attrition among Indiana teachers, 1965-1987. Santa
Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Grissmer, D., & Kirby, S. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality. Teachers College Record,
99, 45-56
Guarino, C., Santibañez, L., Daley, G., & Brewer, D. (2004). A review of the research literature on
teacher recruitment and retention (Technical Report No. TR-164-EDU).Los Angeles: RAND
Corporation.
Heller, D. A. (2004). Teachers wanted: Attracting and retaining good teachers. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American
Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534.
Ingersoll, R.(2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching
and Policy.
Ingersoll, R.M. & Smith, T.M (2003). The wrong solution to teacher shortage. Educational
Leadership, 60 (8), 30-33, Ministry of Education and Ghana Education Service (GES), Ghana
Murnane, R., Singer, J., Willett. J., Kemple, J., & Olsen, R. (Eds.). (1991). Who will teach?:
Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nkrumah, K. (1967). Dark Days in Ghana. New York: International Publishers
Roach, K. D. (1991). Principal‟s use of power, behavior alteration strategies and affinity-seeking
strategies: Effects on teacher job satisfaction. World Communication, 20, 23-37.
41
Stockard, J., & Lehman, M. B. (2004). Influences on the satisfaction and retention of 1st-year
teachers: The importance of effective school management. Education Administration Quarterly, 40,
742-771.UNESCO Institute for Statistics on Ghana
World Bank (1996) Basic Education Sector Improvement Program Report No. 15570-GH,
Washington, The World Bank
42