Embedding Making Every Contact Count in Nursing and Midwifery

Health Psychology, 2021

Objective: This Strategic Behavioral Analysis aimed to: identify barriers and facilitators to health care professionals' implementation of Making Every Contact Count (MECC); code behavioral components of nationally delivered interventions to improve MECC implementation; assess the extent to which these components are theoretically congruent with identified theoretical domains representing barriers and facilitators. Comparing national interventions that aim to support implementation of behavior change related activity to the barriers and facilitators for the target behavior enables identification of opportunities being missed in practice; thereby, facilitating intervention optimization. Method: A mixed-method study involving: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing MECC classified using the COMB model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); a content analysis of national interventions to improve MECC implementation in England using the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) and Behavior Change Techniques Taxonomy (BCTTv1); linking intervention content to barriers identified in the systematic review. Results: Across 27 studies, the most frequently reported barriers related to eight TDF domains: Environmental Context and Resources, Beliefs About Capabilities, Knowledge, Beliefs About Consequences, Intentions, Skills, Social Professional Role and Identity, and Emotions. National interventions aimed at supporting MECC implementation included on average 5.1 BCW intervention functions (Education, Modeling, Persuasion, and Training were used in all interventions) and 8.7 BCTs. Only 21% of BCTs potentially relevant to key domains were used across interventions. The majority of BCTs linked to seven of the eight most important domains were not used in any existing interventions. Conclusions: Intervention developers should seize missed opportunities by incorporating more theoretically relevant BCTs to target barriers to implementing MECC.

2018

This report presents the findings of a commissioned study to evaluate the use of Making Every Contact Count (MECC) within the outpatient MSK Physiotherapy service and Bury Integrated MSK Service at Fairfield General Hospital, part of the Bury and Rochdale Care Organisation which is part of the Northern Care Alliance Group (hereafter referred to as Fairfield MSK Physiotherapy Services). The study was a three–stage evaluation to include: an initial service description analysis for musculoskeletal (MSK) treatment a secondary data analysis of data related to MECC referrals made by Fairfield MSK Physiotherapy Services and a patient questionnaire relating to experiences of MECC within Fairfield MSK Physiotherapy Services

British Journal of Midwifery

Whilst the Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust (Francis, 2013a) largely focussed on the failings in the nursing and medical professions, it was also a reminder to maternity services to review its systems and the quality of its care in line with the Code (NMC, 2015). This article will outline an initiative set up by two labour ward matrons at Kettering General Hospital Foundation Trust entitled 'Back to Basics'. Sue and Kathy reviewed clinical practises in their maternity unit and put in place an initiative to raise standards of care and ensure best practice was recognised, maintained and disseminated.

To present an adaptation of interpretive interactionism that incorporates and honours feminist values and principles.

BMC Nursing, 2021

Background: In Ghana, studies documenting the effectiveness of evidence-based specialized training programs to promote respectful maternity care (RMC) practices in healthcare facilities are few. Thus, we designed a four-day RMC training workshop and piloted it with selected midwives of a tertiary healthcare facility in Kumasi, Ghana. The present paper evaluated the impact of the training by exploring midwives' experiences of implementing RMC knowledge in their daily maternity care practices 4 months after the training workshop. Methods: Through a descriptive qualitative research design, we followed-up and conducted 14 in-depth interviews with participants of the RMC training, exploring their experiences of applying the acquired RMC knowledge in their daily maternity care practices. Data were managed and analysed using NVivo 12. Codes were collapsed into subthemes and assigned to three major predetermined themes. Results: The findings have been broadly categorized into three themes: experiences of practising RMC in daily maternity care, health facility barriers to practising RMC, and recommendations for improving RMC practices. The midwives mentioned that applying the newly acquired RMC knowledge has positively improved their relationship with childbearing women, assisted them to effectively communicate with the women, and position them to recognize the autonomy of childbearing women. Despite the positive influence of the training on clinical practice, the midwives said the policy and the built environment in the hospital does not support the exploration of alternative birthing positions. Also, the hospital lacked the required logistics to ensure privacy for multiple childbearing women in the open labour ward. The midwives recommended that logistics for alternative birthing positions and privacy in the ward should be provided. Also, all midwives and staff of the hospital should be taken through the RMC training program to encourage good practice.

Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2018

1999

BMC Health Services Research

Background Good quality midwifery care saves the lives of women and babies. Continuity of midwife carer (CMC), a key component of good quality midwifery care, results in better clinical outcomes, higher care satisfaction and enhanced caregiver experience. However, CMC uptake has tended to be small scale or transient. We used realist evaluation in one Scottish health board to explore implementation of CMC as part of the Scottish Government 2017 maternity plan. Methods Participatory research, quality improvement and iterative data collection methods were used to collect data from a range of sources including facilitated team meetings, local and national meetings, quality improvement and service evaluation surveys, audits, interviews and published literature. Data analysis developed context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explore and inform three initial programme theories, which were refined into an overarching theory of what works for whom and in what context. Results Trusting re...

Within the United Kingdom, midwifery education programmes can only be delivered at Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) Approved Education Institutions (AEIs) which are situated within the Higher Education framework. The NMC is committed to ensuring that standards of midwifery education programmes remain consistently high and aims to achieve this through a network of Heads of Midwifery Education, known as Lead Midwives for Education (LME). Prior to the inception of the NMC in 2002 as a result of the Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001 (NMC 2009a), this role was formerly known as the Approved Midwife Teacher.

Evidence Based Nursing