Food Research International 43 (2010) 2315–2320
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Food Research International
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / f o o d r e s
Effect of pentosan addition on dough rheological properties
Massimo Migliori, Domenico Gabriele ⁎
Department of Engineering Modelling, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, Cubo 39C, I 87030 Rende (CS), Italy
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 May 2010
Accepted 6 August 2010
Keywords:
Rheological models
Oscillatory measurements
Transient test
Stress relaxation
Nonlinear behaviour
a b s t r a c t
In this paper a complete rheological characterisation of bread dough added with water-solvable pentosans is
showed. In the literature several works are available showing the chemical and physical effect of pentosan
addition but it is still matter of discussion of their effect on the mechanical properties of dough. Therefore,
the main objective is to further study this point, evaluating the effect of pentosans on the rheological
properties of dough, using fundamental measurements and rheological modelling. Small amplitude
oscillations at different temperatures were performed to evaluate material properties and stress relaxation
tests, either within or out of the linear range, were used to investigate the effect of large deformations on
material structure. Results showed that the effect of the addition is variable, depending on the amount, type
of pentosans and deformation amplitude. The obtained results, together with rheological modelling, allow
either to design dough having controlled properties during critical manufacturing steps (e.g. leavening or
baking) or to reduce mechanical properties variability as effect of natural variation in flour characteristics.
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Flour based products are always requested by consumers and their
demand is sharply increased during the last decade. This phenomenon, apart from normal market increase, is basically due to new trend
of flour manufacturers that are increasing the offer of “special flours”
particularly designed for specific application such as: home-made
bread, pizza, spongy cakes, biscuits, and “self-leavening” flour.
According to the craft-made preparation process and the specific
recipe characteristics (e.g.: vegetable fats, sugar, raising agent
addition) the flour should be able to guarantee in any condition the
desired performance, even though in-home facilities are strongly
different from the industrial one. In this concern researchers have to
look into two different problems: either to design the specific flour
composition in order to get the expected performance or to guarantee
constant flour characteristics time to time, tackling natural flour
composition changes. In this concern the addition of natural additives,
obtained either by different flour fractions or by different vegetal
sources, may play a crucial role helping in control flour characteristics
(Fustier, Castaigne, Turgeon, & Biliaderis, 2008; Fustier, Castaigne,
Turgeon, & Biliaderis, 2009; Paraskevopoulou, Provatidou, Tsotsiou, &
Kiosseoglou, 2010; Skendi, Biliaderis, Papageorgiou, & Izydorczyk,
2010). Water soluble pentosans (WSP) and unextractable solids
(WUS) are the major nonstarch component of flour, being mostly
based on hemicellulose (Yin & Walker, 1990) and their role, as
functional ingredients, is well known (D'Appolonia & Gilles, 1971;
⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: + 39 0984 496687; fax + 39 0984 494009.
E-mail addresses:
[email protected] (M. Migliori),
[email protected] (D. Gabriele).
0963-9969/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2010.08.008
Michniewicz, Biliaderis, & Bushuk, 1991). Very extensive chemical
investigations of water soluble (WSP) and insoluble (WIP) pentosans
are available, even though different explanations still hold about their
ability in conditioning rheological properties of dough (Denli & Ercan,
2001; Wang, van Vliet, & Hamer, 2004a). A very accurate description
of the status of the art about pentosan (and xylanase) effect on dough
is proposed by Wang et al. (2004a) and the same authors also
identified that water affinity change due to pentosan presence is
driven both by chemical and physical effect (Wang, van Vliet, &
Hamer, 2004b). In this series of paper, a rheological characterisation at
room temperature (Wang et al., 2003), is applied to different mixtures
of glutenin macro-polymer (GMP) and pentosans, in order to quantify
mechanical impact of the addition, showing that WSP affect GMP
rheological properties and the effect can be adapted to the desired
value by changing water content and/or mechanical energy input. The
authors also showed that WSP treated under freeze-drying conditions
did not exhibit any significant difference when compared with nondried one. This represents valuable information because, in the view
of industrial application, the effect of storage conditions and
technique on pentosan activity has to be clearly understood.
The effects of soluble and insoluble pentosans on breadmaking
were examined measuring specific volume and staling of breads
(Maeda & Norita, 2003) prepared by flours from polishing wheat
grain. Positive results, in terms of increase in loaf volume and retarded
firmness, were obtained for both types of pentosans, even though
larger amount of WIP than WSP seems necessary to obtain good
baking characteristics. The quality improvement caused by WSP was
attributed by the authors to their viscous and gelling properties that
improve the strength of gluten network and, as a consequence, the gas
retention (Maeda & Norita, 2003).
2316
M. Migliori, D. Gabriele / Food Research International 43 (2010) 2315–2320
In this paper the characterisation of standard flour added with
WSP is presented, aiming to investigate the effect of temperature and
WSP amount on the rheological characteristics of dough by
performing a more extensive fundamental characterisation also
using transient experiment. In addition the effect of one WSP storage
technique is investigated by analysing performance of WSP treated
using a spray drying process, in order to increase the storage time.
2. Materials and methods
Samples were prepared by using commercial flour for breadmaking and pentosans kindly supplied by IPALC (Italy). In order to check
the effect of the dehydration process on the pentosan activity, the
starting solution was also spray dried and the same type of pentosans
were supplied by IPALC in two different ways: the original water
solution and the powder obtained by spray drying the solution.
Water content of either flour and pentosans was determined by
using an halogen moisture analyzer (HB43, Mettler Toledo, Germany)
set at 130 °C and recording the final moisture (on wet basis) when
weight loss rate was lower than 1 mg/140 mg.
A moisture of 12.6 ± 0.4% (w/w) was determined for flour, whilst a
solid content of 6.8 ± 0.2% (w/w) was obtained for the pentosan
solution and the powder moisture was found lower than 5%.
2.1. Sample preparation
The reference sample (B sample), including only flour and water in
a mass ratio of 2:1, was modified adding pentosans from both sources
and keeping a constant weigh ratio (1:100 or 1.5:100) between
pentosans and flour. When the solution was used, the proper amount
was computed, on the basis of the determined solid content, to keep
the desired pentosans to flour ratio. When pentosans in powder were
tested, because of the small amount of powder added to the flour, the
water coming from the powder was neglected when changing the
recipe. Three samples were obtained and details on their composition
are reported in Table 1.
Dough was prepared by mixing ingredients in a lab scale mixer
(Hobart, UK) equipped with a flat beater (B type, Hobart, UK) and
keeping 5 min as constant mixing time. Temperature of the mixing
bowl was controlled by circulating water at 30 °C in an external jacket.
After mixing, dough slabs were prepared by using a commercial handroller machine (Imperia, Italy), the sheeting procedure was standardised and after six pass through rollers (decreasing the nip), a final
thickness of approximately 2 mm was obtained. In order to relax
sheeting-induced stresses, samples were stored in aluminium foil for
20 min at room temperature before starting the rheological characterisation. No water loss was measured during this storage period.
2.2. Rheological characterisation
Rheological characterisation of dough has been performed using
either a controlled stress rheometer (DSR200, Rheometric Scientific,
USA) for small amplitude oscillation test or a controlling strain
rheometer (ARES-RFS, TA Instruments, USA) for transient stress
relaxation tests. Both instruments were equipped with parallel plate
geometry (ϕ = 25 mm) and temperature control was ensured by a
Table 1
Sample composition.
Ingredient
Flour (g)
Water (g)
Pentosan powder (g)
Pentosan solution (g)
Sample ID
B
1%P
1%S
1.5%S
500
250
–
–
500
250
5
500.0
181.5
–
73.5
500.0
147.2
–
110.3
Peltier system acting under the lower plate. Potential slippage in
nonlinear viscoelastic conditions was eliminated by applying commercial adhesive-backed sandpaper (grit P40) on surfaces of either the
Peltier plate or the upper plate tool. A constant gap of 2.2 ± 0.1 mm
was kept during all tests.
Oscillatory tests included stress sweep test at the fixed frequency
of 1 Hz performed at different temperatures (30 °C, 50 °C, 70 °C and
90 °C), in order to found the linear viscoelastic region of the material.
At the investigated temperatures, frequency sweep tests were carried
out, in linear conditions, in the frequency range 0.1–10 Hz. Even
though lower frequencies are often used in material characterization
to yield information on long relaxation processes, according to the
rheological model adopted in the present paper to describe dough
behaviour, the 0.1–10 Hz frequency range was considered adequate to
fully describe the rheological behaviour of tested samples.
Dynamic characterization was completed by a temperature ramp
test (time cure) at 1 Hz, in linear viscoelastic conditions, increasing
temperature from 25 °C to 100 °C at 1 °C/min.
Transient tests were performed either within or out of the linear
viscoelastic range of strain (Keentok, Newberry, Gras, Bekes, & Tanner,
2002; Uthayakumaran, Newberry, Phan-Thien, & Tanner, 2002)
imposing two different strain: 0.04% (typical value for linear
viscoelastic range determined by strain sweep tests) and 4%, well
out of the linear region, in order to study mechanical behaviour under
large deformation. It was not possible to carry out transient tests in
nonlinear conditions at high temperature because the increase in
dough consistency, caused by the starch gelatinization, requires
torque values above the rheometer upper limit (maximum torque
0.1 N m). Therefore, stress relaxations, both within and out of the
linear conditions, were carried out only at 30 °C and 50 °C.
During all tests water loss was reduced by covering the sample rim
with a silicon oil (Silicon oil DC, Fluka, Italy) having a viscosity enough
low (300 mPa s), if compared with dough consistency, to avoid any
effect on the test results.
All the tests were performed on three independent preparations
and a good reproducibility was found; experimental data are shown in
terms of average value and standard deviation (always lower than
5.0%).
2.3. Rheological data analysis
According to literature (Phan-Thien, Safari-Ardi, & Morales-Patino,
1997; Uthayakumaran et al., 2002) dough exhibits mainly a solid-like
behaviour as confirmed by the absence of a real steady state shear
viscosity. Any attempt to measure viscosity, in a transient test at
constant shear rate, ended up to a continuous decrease of the viscosity
without any steady viscosity plateau. This problem was faced by some
authors (Phan-Thien et al., 1997) that also recognised the exigency to
use for dough a “solid-like” constitutive equation. A solid-like
approach, recently proposed, is based on the observation that
dough, such as many other foods, exhibits a critical gel behaviour
(Gabriele, D'Antona, & de Cindio, 2001; Ng & McKinley, 2008; Ng,
McKinley, & Padmanabhan, 2006). This approach, originally proposed
to describe the linear viscoelastic behaviour in dynamic tests
(Gabriele et al., 2001) has also been used to describe other types of
deformation, including stress relaxation in linear and nonlinear
conditions for gluten dough (Ng & McKinley, 2008).
According to this literature, rheological properties of dough have
been interpreted considering it as a solid behaving as a “weak gel” in
the investigated frequency range (Gabriele et al., 2001). The proposed
model includes the prediction of a linear behaviour in a double-log
plot of the dynamic moduli vs the frequency and, referring to complex
modulus G*, data can be fitted using a two parameter power law:
G ðωÞ =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1
G′2 + G″2 = Ad ω z
ð1Þ
M. Migliori, D. Gabriele / Food Research International 43 (2010) 2315–2320
where, according to the gel theory (Winter & Chambon, 1986), A can
be interpreted as a measure of the network strength and z is related to
the number of interacting rheological units forming the threedimensional network. It is worth reminding that dough rheological
behaviour is described by this power law model in a limited frequency
window, usually ranging between 0.1 and 100 Hz, therefore experimental frequency sweep tests were carried out only within this
region.
Stress relaxation tests in a defined time range (0.1–10 s) revealed a
power law trend, typical of a critical gel behaviour, as already found in
the literature (Keentok et al., 2002; Ng & McKinley, 2008) for other
type of dough. At shorter times an additional Rouse-like response can
be observed, whilst at long times, terminal relaxation processes can
appear (Ng & McKinley, 2008). As a consequence the relaxation
modulus, in the considered time window, can be fitted by a power law
model:
Gðt Þ = Sd t
−n
ð2Þ
S can be correlated to A by Fourier-transforming Eq. (2) to obtain
dynamic moduli (Winter & Chambon, 1986), yielding:
S=
A
Γð1−nÞ
ð3Þ
Therefore S is related to the strength of the network whilst n is
inversely related to the network extension, both parameters characterise the mechanical response under shear step strain experiment.
It should be noticed that even though both dynamic and transient
tests are able to characterise the viscoelastic behaviour of materials,
different information can be obtained. In fact when oscillatory tests
are performed, Deborah number (De) is kept at its unitary value and
the (linear) viscoelastic structure is investigated at different frequency; on the contrary, during transient tests, observation time is
changed and De changes from very high values to very low ones,
separating the solid-like behaviour form the liquid-like one.
Experimental data from frequency sweep and stress relaxation
tests were fitted according to Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively, and
obtained parameters are reported as mean value and standard error.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Dynamic temperature ramp test
A typical time cure for sample B is shown in Fig. 1, with the aim to
enhance the effect of temperature on the dough characteristics.
Starting from 25 °C, G* decreases sensibly up to onset of starch
gelatinisation temperature and then increases up to a maximum value
Fig. 1. Time cure test for sample B, G′ (●), G″(○), loss tangent (▲).
2317
indicative of the completion of the gelatinisation phenomena. After
this peak in temperature, the effects of the gelatinised starch become
dominant (Salvador, Sanz, & Fiszman, 2000) and no more structural
changes take place. Any further increase in temperature acts only on
the kinetic of molecules mobility, determining the observed complex
modulus decrease.
Another relevant parameter to be considered is the loss tangent
tan δ defined as:
tan δ =
G″
G′
ð4Þ
Loss tangent greater than one indicates a predominant liquid-like
behaviour as the loss modulus is greater than the elastic one. On the
contrary more solid-like material exhibits a tan δ lower than 1.
Initially in the time cure test an almost constant value of the loss
tangent is observed, up to a temperature value higher than the
gelatinisation-onset one; afterwards a continuous decrease, showing
the tendency of the material towards a more “solid like” behaviour, is
found. This result evidenced that, at the beginning of the gelatinisation process when water penetrates the amorphous zone of the starch
granules and swelling starts, an increase in the network strength is
observed whilst no relevant change in dough structure is detected. As
the temperature rises, the progress in water absorption has a
destabilising effect leading to the disorganisation and disruption of
the crystalline zones (Salvador et al., 2000) and, from a rheological
point of view, this causes a significant structuring effect (drop in loss
tangent).
The analysis of time cure (Fig. 1) evidences some relevant
temperatures related to rheological changes in material: the onset
(T 0 ) and the completion (T e ) of gelatinisation phenomena
corresponding, respectively, to the minimum and the maximum in
G* plot; the onset of structural change corresponding to the loss
tangent decrease (Tsl) when the material starts developing a more
pronounced solid-like behaviour.
It is interesting to notice that up to To temperature, even though
moduli value decrease, the material behaviour keeps its initial
characteristics because loss tangent did not change with temperature
and no prevailing decay of any moduli is observed up to Tsl. The
difference between the two temperatures can help in distinguishing
between two different phenomena: the increase of the moduli, as
effect of the gelatinisation in progress, and the more “solid like”
behaviour that can be primarily related to the network extension
variation. It is also noteworthy from Eq. (1) that complex modulus,
measured at 1 Hz in linear viscoelastic conditions, is numerically the
same than A parameter, therefore time cure yields the trend of the
network strength as a function of temperature.
Time cure results show a similar temperature dependence for all
tested samples (Fig. 2a) and complex modulus data evidenced that 1%
P exhibited the weakest structure along the whole temperature range,
even if the G* gap is reduced at high temperatures at the end of the
gelatinisation process. The comparison between samples 1%S and 1.5%
S indicated that at temperature lower than T0 a larger amount of
pentosans yields to a stronger network. On the contrary, after the
gelatinisation onset, the opposite trend is found and sample 1%S
seems to be stronger than 1.5%S up to Te where differences are not
relevant anymore.
When the loss tangent trend is considered (Fig. 2b), it can be seen
that samples B, 1%S and 1.5%S are characterised by a sharp decrease of
this parameter as evidence of a more clear turn-up of the solid-like
behaviour when increasing temperature. On the contrary the sample
1%P shows a transition characterised either by an early onset (lower
Tsl temperature) or by a smoother shape.
This trend is confirmed when the characteristic temperatures are
considered (Table 2), manually determined for all the investigated
samples. It can be seen that the addition of any amount and type of
2318
M. Migliori, D. Gabriele / Food Research International 43 (2010) 2315–2320
Fig. 2. Time cure test for investigated samples, a) complex modulus, b) loss tangent.
Fig. 3. Frequency sweep test for sample 1%P, a) complex modulus, b) loss tangent.
pentosans did not lead to relevant effects on the onset and final
gelatinisation temperature whilst the addition of pentosan powder
strongly affect the Tsl and the sample 1%P is characterised by an earlier
drop in the loss tangent, even if the value of the parameter is always
greater than that measured for the other samples.
3.2. Isothermal oscillatory measurements
More detailed information can be obtained by frequency sweep
tests performed at different temperatures in linear conditions, the
typical trend is shown in Fig. 3 for sample 1%P in terms of complex
modulus and loss tangent evidencing the mechanical response of a
“weak gel”: dynamic moduli increase in value when increasing
frequency, moduli are parallel in the investigated frequency region
and G′ is greater than G″ of more than one order of magnitude (loss
tangent is nearly constant and lower than 1 at any frequency). The
same mechanical behaviour was found for all the investigated
samples and data treatment according to the model proposed in
Eq. (1) was applied computing weak gel model parameter (Table 3).
At room temperature no relevant effect on dough structure was
given by the addition of 1% WSP in solution, in fact network strength
and extension are equal to those of B sample, whilst when increasing
the WSP content (sample 1.5%S) the increase of A was found.
On the contrary the 1%P showed a decrease of the network
strength, whilst no relevant effect was found for the network
extension z, for any of the pentosan addition.
When temperature increases below the gelatinisation temperature, the decrease of A was observed up to 50 °C for 1%P and 1%S
whilst the other two samples did not show a significant variation. The
further increase of temperature up to 70 °C, determines the starch
gelatinisation for all samples as demonstrated either by the increase
of the network strength A of about one order of magnitude or by the
increase of the network extension z that nearly doubles. As a result,
the gelatinised dough is characterised by a more structured network
even if the addition of pentosans affect the structuration process. In
fact at 70 °C 1%S sample exhibits the highest A value, even though at
lower temperature this sample has a network strength lower than B
and 1.5%S. This suggests that, in terms of dough network strength, the
addition of a lower amount of solubilised pentosans acts at higher
temperature whilst, if the structurising effect is requested at lower
temperature, a higher amount of added pentosans is requested. On
the other hand the trend of dried pentosans as less active, is confirmed
Table 3
Weak gel model analysis of dynamic frequency sweep tests (value±mean error).
Sample
A (Pa s1/z)
z (–)
T = 30 °C
Table 2
Characteristic temperatures of samples as determined from time cure test.
Sample ID
To (°C)
Te (°C)
Tsl (°C)
B
1%S
1.5%S
1%P
48 ± 1
52 ± 1
52 ± 1
52 ± 1
76 ± 1
80 ± 1
80 ± 1
78 ± 1
60 ± 1
68 ± 1
64 ± 1
38 ± 1
B
1%S
1.5%S
1%P
33,500 ± 700
32,400 ± 400
41,700 ± 600
24,500 ± 400
B
1%S
1.5%S
1%P
249,000 ± 4000
270,000 ± 2000
229,000 ± 4000
185,000 ± 2000
A (Pa s1/z)
z (–)
T = 50 °C
4.6 ± 0.3
4.3 ± 0.2
4.5 ± 0.2
4.0 ± 0.2
T = 70 °C
32,900 ± 500
28,000 ± 500
31,800 ± 400
19,900 ± 500
5.0 ± 0.3
4.5 ± 0.2
5.0 ± 0.2
4.3 ± 0.3
T = 90 °C
8.3 ± 0.7
8.2 ± 0.4
7.7 ± 0.7
8.0 ± 0.5
132,000 ± 2000
170,000 ± 2000
169,000 ± 2000
132,000 ± 1000
16 ± 3
15 ± 2
15 ± 2
14 ± 1
2319
M. Migliori, D. Gabriele / Food Research International 43 (2010) 2315–2320
because of the increase in network strength lower than the other
samples.
When the temperature is further increased, an opposite trend of
network strength and extension is observed. In fact at 90 °C the dough
network strength decreased and the structure extension increased in
all samples as can be seen if the z value is considered. As far as the A
value is concerned, it is worthy to observe that, despite the differences
in the mechanical behaviour of 1%S and 1.%5S up to 70 °C, at 90 °C
both samples exhibit the same network strength well higher than
those of the reference sample B. On the contrary the addition of spraydried pentosans did not show any significant effect onto the
mechanical behaviour of dough at high temperatures.
3.3. Transient tests: Stress relaxation
The typical relaxation modulus for sample 1%S is reported in Fig. 4
at 30 °C and 50 °C in linear and nonlinear conditions. It can be seen
that in both cases the relaxation modulus shows a linear trend in a
log–log plot, even though a more scattered trend was found for low
strain test because of the closeness to the instrument minimum
sensitivity. The same trend was found for all the investigated samples
and the model proposed (Eq. (2)) was used to fit experimental data;
the values of mechanical parameters are summarised in Table 4.
It can be seen that temperature causes a decrease of the network
strength (S decreases from 30°C to 50 °C) and this confirms, also for
transient mechanical response, the trend already discussed for
dynamic test. For sample B, 1%S and 1.5%S the network extension
does not depend on temperature, as demonstrated by the nearly
constant n values, whilst the network strength, S, slightly decreases,
probably owing to the kinetic effects. These results are in agreement
with either data obtained from frequency sweep tests, showing an
almost constant network extension between 30 °C and 50 °C, or time
cure exhibiting a plateau in loss tangent up to the Tsl limit, always
higher than 50 °C for considered samples.
A different trend was found for sample 1%P characterised by a
slight change in n value, probably due to the early structuring
phenomena caused by the pentosans, in agreement with the lower Tsl
estimated by dynamic tests.
The effects of nonlinear conditions, i.e. large deformations, on
material behaviour are more evident if the ratios between linear and
nonlinear parameters, according to the following definitions, are
considered:
S* =
S in non linear regime
S in linear regime
ð4Þ
Table 4
Weak gel model analysis of transient tests (value ± mean error).
T (°C)
Strain 0.04%
Strain 4%
S (Pa sn)
n (–)
B
30
50
19,400 ± 300
19,100 ± 400
0.267 ± 0.008
0.26 ± 0.01
7580 ± 90
7300 ± 100
0.239 ± 0.007
0.226 ± 0.009
1%S
30
50
7650 ± 50
8020 ± 90
0.290 ± 0.005
0.267 ± 0.009
4250 ± 20
4150 ± 80
0.244 ± 0.004
0.240 ± 0.004
13,400 ± 100
8860 ± 60
0.271 ± 0.009
0.275 ± 0.006
11,660 ± 80
4240 ± 20
0.227 ± 0.006
0.223 ± 0.004
8550 ± 60
695 ± 9
0.257 ± 0.006
0.30 ± 0.01
3470 ± 20
2317 ± 7
0.249 ± 0.005
0.221 ± 0.003
1.5%S
30
50
1%P
30
50
n* =
n in non linear regime
n in linear regime
S (Pa sn)
n (–)
ð5Þ
It is worthy noticing that both S* and n*, related respectively to
ratio in the strength of interactions and the inverse of network
extension, are always lower than unity (see Fig. 5a–b). Therefore it
seems that the increase in deformation promotes a larger network
extension characterised by weaker interactions.
Computed parameters show that pentosan addition yields a
structure more resistant to large deformations, as evidenced by
values of S* always larger than that computed for sample B, even
though solubilised pentosans seems more active than dried ones, in
agreement with dynamic data (Fig. 5a). When network extension is
considered (Fig. 5b), no relevant effect is found, as evidenced by the
value of n*, approximately constant for all tested samples. Therefore it
seems that pentosan addition is particularly positive when large
deformations occur, this effect can be useful to stabilize the
mechanical behaviour of dough during process operations (for
example leavening or baking) when local deformations can be quite
large, improving the final properties. These results seem in agreement
with literature data (Maeda & Norita, 2003) showing an improvement
in bread quality as a consequence of the increase in gluten network
strength caused by the addition of WSP (up to 1% w/w).
Fig. 4. Relaxation modulus for sample 1%P in linear and nonlinear conditions.
2320
M. Migliori, D. Gabriele / Food Research International 43 (2010) 2315–2320
pentosans and temperature). Moreover the dough mechanical
behaviour was revealed to be also more complex, as some of these
effects disappeared when the conditions were changed. Therefore, in
order to obtain the desired final dough characteristics, pentosan
concentration and temperature conditions should be properly
selected.
In these concerns, considering that cereal based products are
characterised by a wide range of kinematic conditions and temperature, rheological analysis can result as a useful tool to optimise dough
mechanical properties. In fact, it can support the addition of specific
ingredients, such as pentosans, aiming to tailor dough properties for
any specific production, also overcoming the problem of natural
variability of flour characteristics.
Acknowledgments
The work was funded by Italian Ministry of University 355 and
Research (MIUR) project “New wheat based products” File no. 6971.
Acknowledgments are due to the Laboratory of Rheology and Food
Engineering at University of Calabria, where the experimental tests
were performed by Mr. Claudio G. Filippo, who is also acknowledged.
References
Fig. 5. Dimensionless weak gel parameters for tested samples, a) S* (Eq. (4)), b) n*
(Eq. (5)).
4. Conclusions
Even though they were extensively studied, the effects of pentosan
addition in dough is not yet completely understood and different
opinions, mainly on rheological effects, can be found in the literature
(Labat, Rouau, & Morel, 2002; Uthayakumaran et al., 2002; Wang
et al., 2004a).
In the present work, dynamic and transient tests were adopted to
evidence the potential contribution of pentosans as “rheological
modifiers” useful to prepare flours for specific applications. It was
found that the addition of solubilised pentosans decreases the
network strength at low temperature (T b 50 °C) whilst increases it
at higher temperature; this effects is slightly modified by increasing
the added amount and a network strength reduction can be noticed at
the investigated intermediate temperature (between 50 °C and
70 °C). On the contrary a slight reduction of network extension was
observed at any condition, even though the effect is more evident at
high temperatures.
The effect of spray-dried pentosans appeared to be strongly
modified by the drying process and, as a consequence, only a
reduction in both network strength and extension was observed for
all tested conditions. They could be useful to reduce the strength of
some flours making them more suitable to be processed.
Nonlinear transient tests evidenced that pentosans seem more
active when a large deformation is used, strongly increasing the
network strength, than in linear viscoelastic conditions.
Dough rheological behaviour is the result of complex interactions
between different components (mainly starch, gluten and water) and
the addition of pentosans introduces a new variable to be considered
when dealing with dough mechanical properties. Results of this paper
demonstrated that modification of rheological behaviour was found
when changing some operating parameters (the amount of added
D'Appolonia, B. L., & Gilles, K. A. (1971). Pentosans associated with gluten. Cereal
Chemistry, 48, 427−436.
Denli, E., & Ercan, R. (2001). Effect of added pentosans isolated from wheat and rye
grain on some properties of bread. European Food Research and Technology, 212,
374−376.
Fustier, P., Castaigne, F., Turgeon, S. L., & Biliaderis, C. G. (2008). Flour constituent
interactions and their influence on dough rheology and quality of semi-sweet
biscuits: A mixture design approach with reconstituted blends of gluten, watersolubles and starch fractions. Journal of Cereal Science, 48, 144−158.
Fustier, P., Castaigne, F., Turgeon, S. L., & Biliaderis, C. G. (2009). Impact of endogenous
constituents from different flour milling streams on dough rheology and semisweet biscuit making potential by partial substitution of a commercial soft wheat
flour. LWT Food Science and Technology, 42, 363−371.
Gabriele, D., D'Antona, P., & de Cindio, B. (2001). A weak gel model for foods. Rheologica
Acta, 40, 120−127.
Keentok, M., Newberry, M. P., Gras, P., Bekes, F., & Tanner, R. I. (2002). The rheology of
bread dough made from four commercial flours. Rheologica Acta, 41, 173−179.
Maeda, T., & Norita, N. (2003). Flour quality and pentosan prepared by polishing wheat
grain on breadmaking. Food Research International, 36, 603−610.
Michniewicz, J., Biliaderis, C. G., & Bushuk, W. (1991). Effect of added pentosans on
some physical and technological characteristics of dough and gluten. Cereal
Chemistry, 68, 252−258.
Ng, T. S. K., McKinley, G. H., & Padmanabhan, M. (2006). Linear to non-linear rheology of
wheat flour dough. Applied Rheology, 16(5), 265−274.
Ng, T. S. K., & McKinley, G. H. (2008). Power law gels at finite strains: The nonlinear
rheology of gluten gels. Journal of Rheology, 52(2), 417−449.
Paraskevopoulou, A., Provatidou, E., Tsotsiou, D., & Kiosseoglou, V. (2010). Dough
rheology and baking performance of wheat flour–lupin protein isolate blends. Food
Research International, 43(4), 1009−1016.
Phan-Thien, N., Safari-Ardi, M., & Morales-Patino, A. (1997). Oscillatory and simple
shear flows of a flour water dough: A constitutive model. Rheologica Acta, 36,
38−48.
Salvador, A., Sanz, T., & Fiszman, S. M. (2000). Dynamic rheological characteristics of
wheat flour–water doughs. Effect of adding NaCl, sucrose and yeast. Food
Hydrocolloids, 20, 780−786.
Skendi, A., Biliaderis, C. G., Papageorgiou, M., & Izydorczyk, M. S. (2010). Effects of two
barley b-glucan isolates on wheat flour dough and bread properties. Food
Chemistry, 119, 1159−1167.
Uthayakumaran, S., Newberry, M. P., Phan-Thien, N., & Tanner, R. I. (2002). Small and
large strain rheology of wheat gluten. Rheologica Acta, 41, 162−172.
Labat, E., Rouau, X., & Morel, M. H. (2002). Effect of flour water-extractable pentosans
on molecular associations in gluten during mixing. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und
Technologie, 35, 185−189.
Wang, M. W., Hamer, R. J., van Vliet, T., Gruppen, H., Marseille, J. P., & Weegels, P. L.
(2003). Effect of water unextractable solids on gluten formation and properties:
Mechanistic considerations. Journal of Cereal Science, 37, 55−64.
Wang, M. W., van Vliet, T., & Hamer, R. J. (2004a). Evidence that pentosans and xylanase
affect the re-agglomeration of the gluten network. Journal of Cereal Science, 39,
341−349.
Wang, M. W., van Vliet, T., & Hamer, R. J. (2004b). How gluten properties are affected by
pentosans. Journal of Cereal Science, 39, 395−402.
Winter, H. H., & Chambon, F. (1986). Analysis of linear viscoelasticity of a cross-linking
polymer at the gel point. Journal of Rheology, 30, 367−382.
Yin, Y., & Walker, C. E. (1990). Pentosans from gluten-washing wastewater: Isolation,
characterization and role in baking. Cereal Chemistry, 69, 592−596.