M B A Lecturers’ Curriculu
I terests i Leadership
Eric Jean GARCIA
Key words:
Abstract:
Leadership, MBA, Critical Management Education
This paper aims to provide insight into MBA lecturers' curriculum
interests in relation to the topic of leadership. Central to this
inquiry is the exploration of MBA lecturers' beliefs and
expectations of leadership learning. An attempt is made to
categorise the purpose of leadership study in five English and
F e h MBAs
i estigati g le tu e s assu ptio s a out hat
counts as a leadership success in the corporate world. Guided by
the work of Habermas on human knowledge interests, the main
value of this inquiry is to provide research-based evidence of the
prevailing interests in the teaching of leadership in MBA curricula.
The analysis reveals that, although driven by different pedagogical
motives, the majority of MBA lecturers are not committed to
providing participants with a full understanding of leadership that
might serve people and society beyond mere business ends.
Published online before print November 13, 2009,
doi: 10.1177/1350507609347588
Management Learning February 2010 vol. 41 no. 1 21-36
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 1 of 21
Introduction
I
n recent years there has been a growing interest in leadership development in
MBAs as well as a growing dissatisfaction about the content of MBA curricula.
On the one hand, leadership has become a pervasive subject of executive
education throughout the world and the majority of MBA schools are now
equipped to undertake the mission of providing training and education in
leadership (Bickerstaffe, 2005, 2007). On the other hand, MBA course directors
face the challenge of reconsidering their educational model to free their
curriculum from the domination of narrow instrumental forms of rationality
(Alvesson and Willmott, 2001, Dehler, et al., 2001, Roberts, 1996) so as to serve
the interests of the wider society rather than almost exclusively, although not
entirely, those of the corporate world through teaching and those of the academic
community through research (Mintzberg, 2004, Pfeffer and Fong, 2002, Starkey
and Tempest, 2005).
The relationship between these two trends is unclear and may be more
coincidental than causal. Nevertheless, it is troubling to see that, when MBA
curricula i teg ate o e ou ses a d a ti ities ai ed at de elopi g pa ti ipa ts
leadership skills, criticism about the lack of educational and professional relevance
of these curricula does not weaken. As a result, it seems that the recent emphasis
on leadership studies in MBA curricula has not produced significant change. A
number of reasons might account for this including:
The structure, ideology, and ethos of MBA curricula might be fundamentally
opposed to an education of leaders (Gabriel, 2005).
The level of integration with other subjects and/or the teaching strategies used
might fall short of providing participants with a significant improvement of
their leadership skills (Mintzberg, 2004).
The time and resources allocated to leadership development initiatives might
be inappropriate to seriously address the curriculum challenges facing MBA
schools (Elmuti, et al., 2005).
Participants might be insufficiently experienced and/or ill-prepared to really
benefit from a leadership development programme (Mintzberg, 2004).
There might be a dominant perception among participants that studying
leade ship i a lass oo is a aste of ti e, espe iall
he the a e
e ui ed to e o e thei
o fo t la ket a d produce a high level of
commitment and effort (Grey and French, 1996).
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 2 of 21
Pa tl e ause MBA edu atio is t pi all a ash o at a u i e sities
(Pfeffer and Fong, 2002), there might be reluctance within the teaching staff to
e gage se iousl
ith leade ship issues e o d pa ti ipa ts sho t-term
expectations.
There might be a skill deficit among teaching staff notably due to the shortage
of continuing professional development in MBA schools (Williams, 2000).
E e
he MBA le tu e s se iousl atte pt to halle ge pa ti ipa ts take for-granted assumption about leadership from a more critical perspective, the
outcome can be deceptive (Sinclair, 2005).
At the heart of these issues lies the tricky and problematic nature of leadership,
which makes leadership development activities particularly challenging for
lecturers. The trickiness of leadership can be explained as follows. Leadership is an
essentially contested concept (Gill, 2006), which has been subject to an
etymological history of change (Grace, 2003). F o a esea h sta dpoi t, the
intellectual integrity of leadership as a legitimate and important field of study has
e ai ed ope to uestio (Collinson and Grint, 2005) and remains thorny
because it involves personal skills such as reflexivity (Schön, 1984) and emotional
intelligences (Goleman, et al., 2003). For instance, the variety of learning
strategies that can be used to promote leadership development (Bush and Glover,
2004) can be frustrating for MBA lecturers. The practice of leadership is also a
complex activity depending on both social and cultural contexts (Hofstede, 2001,
Mellahi, 2000, Rosen, 1984). As shown by Rost (1993) on leadership research in
the US, a variety of perceptions of what leadership is can be found within a given
culture over a relatively short period of time. Therefore, the real impact of
leadership on organisational performance remains uncertain and hard to measure
(Pfeffer, 1993).
The problematic nature of leadership lies in the radically different projects for
people and society that can be pursued through its study. As highlighted by Foster
(1989), the topic of leadership can be used to either sustain the project of a
u eau ati - a age ial so iet o de elop a e a ipato p oje t fo people.
In the former project, social relations in the workplace are largely determined by
hierarchical structures of power and the dominant objective is goal achievement.
To this end, the purpose of leadership is irremediably tied to meeting organisation
needs and accomplishing performance objectives in such a way that the current
social order is maintained by the leader. In the case of an emancipatory project,
the main purpose of leadership is to make organisations more democratic and
more accountable to wider constituencies than just the primary stakeholders (e.g.
customers and shareholders). Here, leadership is somewhat distributed across the
workforce and aims to attend to the moral needs of followers (Burns, 2003, Gini,
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 3 of 21
1998, Greenleaf, 1977) as well as to seriously empower people to bring about
effective economic, social, and environmental changes in both the workplace and
society at large.
The research agenda
MBA lecturers have, for better or worse, a crucial role in producing and
reproducing the practices of leadership. However, given the tricky and
problematic nature of leadership, what these lecturers are trying to do with the
topic of leadership is neither neutral nor value-free nor culture-free. For instance,
the recognition that organisational behaviour courses have been underpinned and
legitimized by positivistic conceptions of social sciences, particularly through
positivistic versions of economics and psychology (Steffy and Grimes, 1992) poses
the p o le of the e te t to hi h MBA le tu e s eliefs a d assu ptio s fit this
description and contribute to extending this process through leadership studies. In
this de ate, is ‘eed a d A tho s lai that MBA le tu e s should e o e thei
i stitutio al a d pedagogi al e es
p o idi g o e
iti al pe spe ti es
within their programmes (1992 p.610) well-fou ded? O is Ha a d Hodgki so s
(2008) contention that MBAs are already providing participants with a satisfactory
level of critical understanding of managing tenable? Clearly, in the absence of
empirical research, it is difficult to provide insightful interpretations of what MBA
lecturers might attempt to do in respect of leadership in their curricular activities.
This paper aims to provide insight into MBA le tu e s u i ulu i te ests i
hate e the all leade ship . The o ept of u i ulu i te ests is ooted i
the idea of curriculum developed by Barnett and Coate (2005) and raises a
fundamental question: what is leadership study for? Or, more specifically, in which
di e tio should MBA pa ti ipa ts lea i g e pe ie e a out leade ship e
pointed? It also raises questions about what counts as leadership success in the
corporate world and whose interests do MBA lecturers aim to primarily serve in
their teaching: those of MBA graduates, the top management, other company
workers, company stakeholders, or society at large? These questions have in
o
o the e plo atio of MBA le tu e s e pe tatio s of leade ship lea i g.
The efo e, hat is at stake he e is MBA le tu e s o te tio s a out the i flue e
leadership study should have on the way participants will practise leadership in
the workplace. In that respect, the value of this inquiry is to provide researchbased evidence of the prevailing interests in the teaching of leadership in MBA
curricula.
Methodology and research strategy
The methodological approach of this inquiry recognizes that MBA lecturers are
taking a deliberately active part in defining and using the various forms of
knowledge available about leadership in their teaching activities. As such, they do
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 4 of 21
not act as passive transmitters of knowledge about leadership. On the contrary,
they select, clarify, adapt, re-distribute, assess and therefore transform knowledge
a out leade ship. I doi g so, the a
e assi ilated as so ial age ts ho
ope ate
ea s of sele ti e s ee s (Storey, 1993) through which they study
and interpret leadership for the purpose of helping MBA participantss to make
sense of leadership practice in the workplace. More indiscernibly, their work and
behaviour are also involved in shaping the hidden curriculum of MBAs. This
expression is used as a shorthand for highlighting the importance of implicit norms
and rules, which, beyond public documentation, official course handbooks,
textbooks, and lecture notes, might reproduce social inequalities and create a
managerial elite subservient to capitalist interests (Apple, 1990, Bowles and Gintis,
1976). Therefore, the decision was made to fo us o MBA le tu e s pe so al
k o ledge a d i te p etatio s, the e
appl i g Be k s o eptio of so ial
science (Beck, 1979):
The purpose of social science is to understand social reality as different people see
it and to demonstrate how their views shape the action which they take within
that reality. Since the social sciences cannot penetrate to what lies behind social
ealit , the ust o k di e tl ith a s definitions of reality and with the rules
he devises for coping with it. What social science offers is explanation, clarification
and demystification of the social forms which man has created around himself.
(Cited in Cohen, et al., 2003)
In compliance with this conception of social reality, the underlying principle
guiding this inquiry is that revealing insight into the societal purpose of leadership
in MBAs requires empirical evidence and, thus, to meet individually those
identified as the key disseminators of knowledge about leadership in these
programmes. These disseminators are the lecturers who have a personal leverage
to i flue e pa ti ipa ts
eliefs, assu ptio s, a d eha iou elated to
leadership. In the context of this study, they typically teach Leadership,
Organisational Behaviour, Human Resources, and Strategy courses. However, for
simplification they will be called MBA lecturers.
An empirical study of five MBA programmes was conducted across the two leading
MBA providers in Europe in terms of the number of MBA schools and
programmes, namely the UK and France. Twenty-five in-depth interviews were
o du ted hi h i luded al ost all the le tu e s spe ialisi g i leade ship . The
esea h desig used is that of a ultisite ase stud (Creswell, 1998), which
involves a single method (interviews) for gathering data, yet enabling a
triangulation of data by means of different geographical sources also alled spa e
t ia gulatio (Denzin, 1970). However, this study is not intrinsically comparative
in the sense that the st ateg used he e does ot seek to i spe t edu atio al
e tities o e e ts to e plai thei si ila ities o diffe e es (Thomas, 1998 p.1). In
this regard, it is worth noting that, although conducted in two different countries
the analysis of data from this study showed no significant differences between
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 5 of 21
lecturers relating to their base country of operation. Certainly, a larger sample
would be needed to be more conclusive on this issue.
Two major criteria were used to select the five MBA programmes. Firstly, all
schools offer an executive MBA programme. This choice is justified by the growing
attractiveness of part-time MBAs, which now represent two-thirds of the MBA
degrees awarded worldwide (MBAinfo.com, 2006). It is also justified by the profile
of participants, who are experienced professionals with, supposedly, more
chances to take a leadership role in organisations as compared with regular fulltime participants. Secondly, all MBA programmes selected for this inquiry satisfied
at least two of the three leading quality assurance schemes, namely AACSB,
AMBA, and EQUIS.
The tactical approach adopted for conducting the interviews is that of the
i te ie guide de eloped Patto (1980). With this approach, interviews were
conducted in English or French by the author in an open-ended fashion so that
research topics and issues were specified in general terms. The data generated
from the interviews were examined, interpreted, and sorted out with the
objective of identifying the societal purposes served by the leadership topic as it is
understood and acted upon by informants. Once word-processed, the method
used to a age the data is the the ati
at i , the pu pose of hi h is to
classify and organise data according to the themes, concepts and apparent
categories emerging from t a s ipts so as to ela o ate a ohe e t a d
o p ehe si e a al ti st u tu e alig ed ith the esea h o je ti es (Ritchie, et
al., 2003 p.221). With the aim to encourage informants to have a true freedom of
speech, it was decided that the real names of MBA schools and the identity of
informants be systematically anonymised.
The theory of constitutive knowledge interests
To help ensure that this inquiry is pursued through a wide range of possibilities,
the analysis was guided by the theory of knowledge-constitutive interests
developed by Jürgen Habermas (1972). A major concern of Habermas is the spread
of instrumental reason to all areas of social life and its corollary, the rise of a
te h o ati o s ious ess , defi ed as a ideolog e e gi g from the fusion of
science, technology and industry realised through the pursuit of what Weber
(1947) te s
ea s-e d atio alit . Ha ermas describes technocratic
consciousness as being not simply based on notions of just exchange, but also on
a te h o ati justifi atio of the so ial o de sustai ed
a g eate tha e e
involvement of administrators and technicians in social and econo i affai s
(1971 p.103). The risk is that technocratic consciousness not only justifies
domination by a particular class (e.g. business leaders), but also affects the very
structure of human interests notably because of an increasing tendency to define
practical problems as technical issues.
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 6 of 21
But, for Habermas, it is possible to escape from the domination of instrumental
reason and the ascendance of positivism by reaffirming the necessity of selfreflection and self-understanding through a systematic investigation of the specific
human interests constituting the forms of knowledge in any particular domain.
The modalities of this enquiry are contained in the theory of knowledgeconstitutive interests, which postulates that knowledge is historically rooted and
interest-bound and needs to be understood as the result of human activity. By this
means, Habermas rejects the Kantian approach that such activity can emerge in an
ahisto i al a d t a s e de tal su je t ut i stead e
a es the p e ept of
histo i al ate ialis , stati g that histo , so ial ealit a d atu e a e all
products of human labour (Held, 1980 p.255).
Fo
o o , the ai o je ti e of Ha e as s theo is to u o e the
conditions for the possibility of knowledge in relation to human activity. In this
attempt, knowledge is understood as reflective of problems people encounter in
their effort to achieve social and economic development. People organise their
e pe ie e a o di g to k o ledge- o stituti e i te ests o a priori interests for
constructing and interpreting work and life experience (Habermas, 1972 p.196). In
short, people must produce from nature what is needed for material existence,
must communicate with others through the use of intersubjective forms of
language within the context of a rule-governed society and must develop a
reflective appropriation of human life through which the interest-bound quality of
knowledge can be felt. Based on these perspectives, Habermas developed the
hypothesis that human beings have three basic modes of interests.
The first a priori i te est is te h i al ; a te
i di ati g that k o ledge is
governed by instrumental reason, whereby natural phenomena are reified and
objectified. At the level of leadership theory, instrumental reason enables the
ascendance of positivism, through which the central purpose of leadership is to
o t ol a d
a ipulate people s eeds a d
oti atio s
ai l
usi g
quantitative strategies. At the level of leadership action, instrumental reason gives
ise to te h o ati o s ious ess o a i easi g te de
to atio alize
leadership challenges as tactical problems to be solved. Epistemologically,
technical a priori interests in leadership are rooted in natural or empiricallyanalytical sciences, which are structured to generate knowledge in the forms of
laws and theories that are grounded in the regularity of observable facts.
The second a priori i te est is p a ti al ; a te
i di ati g that k o ledge is
governed by contextual circumstances and personal experiences. Here, the
fundamental purpose of leadership knowledge is to give sense to the complexity
of leadership reality by means of interpretive strategies, such as hermeneutics. For
instance, within practical a priori interests in leadership, human perceptions of
leadership situations are perceived as a socio-cultural phenomenon requiring
interpretation; a process by which the language and the social context of the
object is penetrated. In effect, what we know about leadership can be enhanced
through the establishment of intersubjective understanding, thereby making this
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 7 of 21
knowledge subject to constant revision. From this perspective, the search for laws
or law-like generalisations specified above with technical interests is irrelevant and
predictions of leadership behaviour are inherently problematic.
The third a priori i te est is
iti al ; a te
hose i efe e e to iti al
sciences, which aims to provide people with an adequate understanding of all
social practices notably by disclosing deformations of communication. For
Habermas, the main guiding principle of critical sciences is emancipatory, a
o ept d a
f o Ma s o eptio of the atu e of o ga isatio a d f o a
personal interpretation of Freudian psychoanalysis theory. The former conceives
the development of social organisations in terms directly dependent on the
productive forces (working class). The latter focuses on the development of
socially expressible needs and motivational patterns, which can be the result of
unconscious mechanisms rather than conscious control. In sum, the principle of
e a ipatio o sists of ot o l o e o i g the o st ai ts of atu e, like
s a it , ut also dissol i g s ste s of disto ted o
u i atio (Held, 1980
p.277).
Within critical a priori interests, the aim of leadership is to deliver a commendable
agenda for people and society by means of self-understanding, intellectual
freedom and autonomy. The process of self-reflection and autonomy is grounded
in both theory and practice, enabling the achievement of a true unity of
k o ledge a d i te est; it is i a o plishi g self-reflection that reason grasps
itself as i te ested (Habermas, 1972 p.212). In contrast to the two other modes of
knowledge interests, this one is not immediately connected to the utilisation of
knowledge nor can it be reduced to an independent form of thinking based on
informed judgement. Rather, from this mode of interests, it will be possible to
explain that leadership objectivity can be a positivistic illusion and that language
distortions make underpinning ideologies and their reinforcing effect on existing
power structures difficult to penetrate. From there, leadership action depends on
an individual and collective consciousness of the influencing forces or hypostatised
powers that condition what we know and do in regard to leadership; in particular
those produced by positivist and interpretivist strategies.
Of ou se, Ha e as th ee-fold conceptualisation of knowledge and a priori
knowledge interests might not do justice to the full array of knowledge interests in
leadership. Nevertheless, a key advantage of this conceptualisation at the level of
this i ui is to e og ise that MBA le tu e s u i ulu i te ests i leade ship
can be driven by at least three basic ontological and epistemological needs which
are not mutually exclusive. Therefore, throughout the analysis of data collected
f o the i te ie s, MBA le tu e s u i ulu i te ests i leade ship e e
evaluated through the light of these three a priori knowledge interests, namely
technical, practical and critical.
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 8 of 21
Key findings
The analysis of the data gathered for this study confirmed the relevance of using
Ha e as theo of k o ledge o stituti e i te ests. Fi stl , the a alysis
e ealed si atego ies of do i a t le tu e s u i ulu i te ests i leade ship
which have been grouped into three clusters (performative, idiosyncratic, and
reformative). Then, on closer inspection, it has been possible to link each of these
clusters with each of the three a priori knowledge interests identified by
Habermas as well as with the two overall societal projects suggested by Foster
(1989) and discussed above (see Figure 1).
Clusters of
curriculum interests in
leadership
A priori knowledge
Interests
Performative
Broad societal projects
supported by leadership
Technical
Bureaucraticmanagerial
Idiosyncratic
Practical
Reformative
Critical
Emancipatory
Figure 1: Overview of the luste s of MBA le tu e s u i ulu i te ests i
leade ship a d the elatio ships esta lished ith Ha e as th ee asi a priori
knowledge interests and the two basic kinds of societal projects, which might be
supported by leadership studies.
Performative curriculum interests
The pe fo ati e luste of u i ulu i te ests ep ese ts fo t -eight percent of
the i fo a ts of this stud . The
o d pe fo ati e is de i ed f o
pe fo ati it , a te
used
L ota d (1984) to conceptualize a changing
condition of knowledge in post-i dust ial so iet , hi h, fuelled
p og ess i
technology and the expansion of capitalism, drives the rise of a new spirit that
replaces the true and false distinction in favour of the efficient and inefficient
distinction. Underpinning this new spirit is performativity, a new basis for
knowledge, whose criterion for legitimation has become unresponsive to grand
narratives but depends on its capacity to achieve the maximization of input-output
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 9 of 21
atio. Although ide tif
a d pseudo-defeatist
u i ulu i te ests o
intent of leadership
profitability.
i g ith diffe e t e phases, a el iased , o petiti e
see Ta le 1 , the MBA lecturers driven by performative
pe fo ati e le tu e s sha e the elief that the ulti ate
studies is to help participants to maximize corporate
Performative curriculum interests
Categories
Main purposes
Competitive
Leadership points to changes in the
marketplace, so the need to develop
responsive strategies for increasing the
competitive advantages of companies.
Biased
Leadership points to new societal
changes (corporate responsibility and
sustainability), so highlighting the need
to adapt to new situations but
essentially for preserving profitability.
Pseudo-defeatist
Leadership could be used as a means
for undermining the capitalist order,
but this view cannot be imposed on
participants and, therefore, the only
choice left is to meet market needs.
Table 1: Main purposes of the categories making the performative curriculum interests
cluster
Basically, performative curriculum interests pursue a common goal, namely to
operate effectively within business environments in terms of assets and incomes
maximization. The empirical evidence provided in this research shows that the
MBA lecturers whose overriding objective is to help MBA participants to maximize
o pa ies assets sha e the belief that leadership and organisational performance
are unambiguously linked. On the one hand, the view that leadership has an
impact on company results is regarded as a fact. On the other hand, studying
leadership for improving company performance is, in itself, a worthwhile project
for society in terms of wealth and income distribution. So, the underlying beliefs
and assumptions about the study of leadership are sympathetic to what is usually
referred to as an American approach in business studies, which is renowned for its
u faili g suppo t of usi ess a d a ket alues (Clarke and Newman, 1997,
Crainer and Dearlove, 1998, Engwall and Zamagni, 1998, Locke, 1989).
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 10 of 21
In attempting to help companies to operate more effectively in this world,
performative lecturers are inclined to objectify leadership behaviour, making it a
tangible variable of business performance. In doing so, they promote the view that
leadership reality is objective because it can be associated with tangible and
systematic facts. The process of objectifying leadership is essentially based on two
arguments. Firstly, in a world of change, where turmoil, uncertainty, and volatility
prevail, the need for leadership becomes more acute and significant. As stated by
a E glish le tu e , i this fast ha gi g a d o ple o ld, the need for effective
leade ship is kee l felt . Se o dl , the e is the idea that a ket fo es a e
eified e ause the a e felt to e o ipote t i the se se that the ha e a
immediate, profound and far-reaching impact on societies and their economic
development. In other words, the consequences of poor leadership can be
disastrous and measurable. From a micro perspective, poor leadership means
incompetence and creates a demotivated, frustrated workforce, high employee
turnover, low morale and loss of productivity. From a macro perspective, poor
leadership reduces the performance of companies, destroys jobs and eventually
hampers economic growth. These two perspectives suggest that the main
challenge of leadership is to deal effectively and opportunistically with market
forces so that leadership effectiveness can be measured in terms of incomes,
productivity, market shares and stock values.
The idea that leadership effectiveness ultimately focuses on company
performance is expressed by a French MBA lecturer for whom the project of
changing society from his curriculum agenda is clearly inappropriate:
What you expect from a leader is his capacity to understand the society in
which we live. His role is not to change it but to anticipate its needs and
expectations. In understanding the world in which we live, a leader could
adapt and organize available resources in an optimal fashion.
Supporting performative interests in leadership implies a particular way of
thinking about the workforce and how people can effectively contribute to
improving the performance of companies and maximizing their assets. The central
idea about the workforce is the need to treat it right because a satisfied worker is
more productive than an unsatisfied one. More specifically, in this ever changing
and complex world, the challenges posed by an increasingly educated workforce
ha e e o e u de ia le fo o pa ies. Fo i sta e, i e p essi g this ie , a
English lecturer said:
More than ever, people must be treated as human bei gs…. It is e o i g
axiomatic that effective leaders should never underestimate the
importance of human factors in business success.
But beyond recognizing and emphasizing the importance of the human dimension
in achieving business success, two underlying assumptions are also made. Firstly,
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 11 of 21
appropriate leadership, more than any other causes, determines the level of
workforce motivation and compliance. Secondly, the properties under which the
level of engagement of the workforce can be improved are identifiable and
measurable, preferably by means of large-scale empirical surveys and
psychometric tests. It is therefore unsurprising that performative lecturers are
keen to find effective ways of rationalizing leadership behaviour and performance.
For instance, five lecturers from two different MBA schools located on both sides
of the ha el lea l e p essed thei i te ests i ep ese ti g leade ship
effe ti e ess i a e uatio fo . Thei
o e elief is that leade ship
effe ti e ess LQ a e fa to ized so that it esults f o
o puti g e otio al
i tellige e EQ ith og iti e i tellige e IQ a d et o ki g i tellige e
(NQ):
LQ = EQ + IQ + NQ
In addition, this study reveals that performative lecturers are fundamentally trying
to develop pa ti ipa ts ualit of ei g ade uatel ualified to lead business
activities through people rather than for people. The e p essio leadi g fo
people suggests a se a t-leadership role, which emphasizes service to others at
work where sharing of power in decision making is practised even when it is not in
the financial interest of the organisation (Greenleaf, 1977). The expression
leadi g th ough people i ol es a diffe e t e phasis. He e, the ai halle ge
of leaders is to help business organisations to achieve success by means of a
supportive workforce and so is the main purpose of leadership study. This view of
leade ship ge e ati g pe fo a e th ough a
oti ated a d e og ized
workforce implies that workers are seen more as performers, whose motivation
and commitment to company interests can be maximized and controlled. The
emphasis on company interests also suggests that the space allowed to the
workforce to develop its full potential as human beings is marginal. In this context,
the e p essio leade ship o pete e is esse tiall used as a etapho to
desig ate e e pe fo a e th ough o ke s ho a e see
o e as pe fo e s
athe tha efle ti e a to s (Barnett, 1994 p.77).
As a result, it can be said that performative curriculum interests reflect the
technical a priori interests in leadership outlined before on the following basis:
firstly, both interests are inclined to objectify the business reality, considering
organisational performance to be the cornerstone of leadership; secondly, within
both performative and technical a priori interests attempts are made to measure
and predict leadership behaviour; thirdly, constituents of leadership behaviour can
be surveyed by means of positivistic methodologies, such as large-scale surveys,
enabling the development of formulas and standardised leadership
questionnaires. From a societal perspective, performative interests are essentially
supporting the project of a bureaucratic-managerial society mainly because they
explicitly and unambiguously tie the purpose of leadership to improving
organisations and their efficiency rather than transforming the world.
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 12 of 21
Idiosyncratic curriculum interests
The idios
ati luste ep ese ts fo t -four percent of the informants of this
study. It consists of two categories of curriculum interests in leadership, namely
a ee ist a d self-a a e ess . Fo the suppo te s of self-awareness curriculum
interests, the cornerstone of leadership study is to prompt MBA participants to
reflect on their needs and to develop new patterns of thinking so that they can act
in accord with their own values and improve their personal leadership
effectiveness. For the supporters of careerist curriculum interests, the
fundamental purpose of what they do in respect of leadership in their teaching is
to espo d effe ti el to pa ti ipa ts pe so al a ee eeds a d goals. The
analysis showed that the common project of these two curriculum interests is to
de elop pa ti ipa ts sel es as de isio -makers, hence to focus on them as
individuals, with unique needs and capabilities. It also revealed that their common
objective is to improve pa ti ipa ts self-capacity or self-determination to succeed
professionally. In summary, idiosyncratic lecturers aim to ealize pa ti ipa ts full
potential and personal goals as corporate executives.
This intent to develop participants sel es is ehi d the hoi e to a e this luste
of u i ulu i te ests idios
ati . Et ologi all , idios
as o es f o the
Greek word idiosunkrasia made of idios ea i g o
o p i ate , sun meaning
ith a d krasis ea i g
i tu e . So, underpinning the use of the term
idiosyncratic is an intention to qualify something that is personal with a particular
blend of characteristics.
In some respects, idiosyncratic curriculum interests share with Schön (1984) the
belief that the challenge of developing professional leadership is to promote the
idea that participants should e og ize a d o iliate thei o
espoused theo
of a tio
ith thei o
theo -in-use . Fo i sta e, a E glish le tu e poi ted
to self-a a e ess as this e t a set of tools, o f a e o ks, fo u de sta di g
people a d the sel es MBA pa ti ipa ts eed to e o e effe ti e leade s .
A othe o e asse ted that it is u ial to de elop pa ti ipa ts self-awareness
e ause leade ship o pete ies a e e ha ed th ough self-awareness and a
capacity for self- efle ti e judge e t . Fo he , MBA participants who
de o st ate a heighte ed apa it fo i t ospe tio a d self-dis o e
ae
ge e all those ith the st o gest leade ship pote tial . The u de l i g p i iple
ehi d these app oa hes is k o th self a d the p e ise that ou a ot lead
othe s u til ou ha e fi st led ou self th ough a st uggle ith opposi g alues
(Kouzes and Posner, 1987 p.301). As such, the practice of leadership is embedded
i a efle tio -in-a tio p o ess, he e de isio -makers are encouraged to
question the assumptive structure of their knowing-in-action, which gives them
the opportunity to reframe problems and restructure their strategy of action.
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 13 of 21
The primary concern for idiosyncratic lecturers is to help MBA participants to
ope ate self- o s iousl , a el to pe fo i the o po ate o ld ith a a ute
knowledge of oneself as decision-maker carrying a professional project or simply
as a o s ious ei g ith a ill of o e s o . As stated a F e h le tu e :
Having leadership requires an ability to influence others, but also to be influenced
by others. Too often, decision-makers from large corporations that I know miss
out the se o d poi t a d thus eha e like a ipulato s… I o de to i flue e
while being consciously influenced there is need for a great dose of selfknowledge. This is the reason why I often say that one of the conditions for
de elopi g o e s o leade ship is to sta t ith a ge ui e i t ospe tio .
The underlying assumption of this statement is that leadership is a shared process
of influence and, as such, requires the highest possible level of self-knowledge as a
condition for interacting successfully with others. Leadership is conceived more as
a social process than a specialized role and the main leadership challenge for
decision-makers is to deal with the personal capabilities and the aspirations of
people. However, when prompted to elaborate about the downside of leadership
a ipulatio , this le tu e e plai ed that
a ipulatio is i disso ia le f o
leade ship a d he e, is i e ita le... So, it is the leade ship s jo to e su e that
people al a s t ust thei leade s .
The perspective about practical a priori interests provided by Habermas (1972) is
associated with idiosyncratic curriculum interests on the following basis. For
Habermas, the establishment of an intersubjective understanding is a condition
and a mode though which knowledge can be enhanced. From this perspective,
curricular activities do not disclose the reality of leadership situations as they
appear within a behavioural system of instrumental action. Rather, they are
directed toward the transcendental structure of various actual forms of leadership
life, within each of which the reality of leadership situations is interpreted
according to a specific grammar of apprehension and of leadership action.
Therefore, by using Ha e as theo of k o ledge-constitutive interests, it is
possible to provide a distinct philosophical ground for idiosyncratic curriculum
interests from which leadership is essentially a social process conditioned by
language activities or communication.
However, although idiosyncratic lecturers showed an intense interest in the
interactivity of leadership influence between working team-mates, yet, they never
in any way tried to link the study of leadership with any form of engagement
to a ds i p o i g people s li es o the do i a t so io-economic order. Rather,
throughout the interviews, idiosyncratic lecturers insisted on the importance of
letting participants develop their own understanding and belief of what is
leadership for. When the pedagogical focus of leadership study is the realisation of
pa ti ipa ts pe so al goals, idios
ati le tu e s did ot sho thei i te tio to
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 14 of 21
challenge the nature of these goals. Similarly, when leadership learning aims to
i p o e pa ti ipa ts p ofessio al t aje to ies, idios
ati le tu e s did ot
show a keen interest in influencing the nature and direction of these trajectories.
As a result, idiosyncratic lecturers are inclined to act as facilitators of personal
success but do not attempt to encourage MBA participants to challenge their
assumptions relative to their leadership roles in society. From a societal
perspective, this inclination suggests that the overall project supported by
idiosyncratic interests is left open-ended. Yet, when considering the reasons
behind the decision to invest time and money in an MBA, the nature of this
project appears less indeterminate. For instance, it is widely accepted that
pa ti ipa ts hoi e to atte d a MBA p og a
e is esse tiall d i e
a ee
advancement and income growth (Bickerstaffe, 2007, Pfeffer and Fong, 2002). As
a result, by default, it is mainly the bureaucratic-managerial project that is likely to
be supported by idiosyncratic curriculum interests in leadership.
Reformative curriculum interests
O l eight pe e t of the i fo a ts ha e ee ide tified ith efo ati e
curriculum interests. For them, the main purpose of leadership study is to
promote social changes in the workplace. By emphasising the declining public
trust of business and political leaders they describe leadership as a moral activity,
in which the primary issue is whether leadership power is used wisely and well. In
that sense they give support to Greenleaf (1977) and Burns (2003) for whom
leadership has the potential to call followers to moral purposes that exceed their
own desires, thereby expanding their range of interest and increasing the
worthwhileness they might accomplish in the world.
The core belief of reformative lecturers is that decision-makers need to operate
pu posefull as e lighte ed p o ote s of o al, de o ati a d e i o e tall
sensitive projects for business organisations, people and society. Therefore, by
means of a workforce fully integrated into the leadership processes, the concept
of leade ship a
e positi el i st u e talized to i g a out p og essi e
t a sfo atio s i so iet . The u de l i g idea of the e p essio p og essi e
t a sfo atio i so iet is that p og ess a ot e est i ted to the ealth of
corpo atio s, o a it e alie ated
its f ag e tatio i to e e o e s o
personal motives and interests. Alternatively, other forms of progress, which are
more democratic and more accountable to the concerns of a much wider
constituency than shareholders and top executives, exist and need to be
implemented.
The hoi e of the o d efo ati e fo ualif i g this luste of u i ulu
interests is justified by the general idea it conveys. Its root- o d efo
introduces the notion of gradual and moral change for the better, in which, as
suggested by the Oxford Dictionary of English (ODE, 2003), a reform action
i ol es a ha ge i so ethi g espe iall i a i stitutio o p a ti e i o de to
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 15 of 21
i p o e it . The idea that ha ge ust e g adual o es f o a common
distinction made by political scholars between reform and revolution (Luxemburg,
1973, Steger, 1997). Both terms address the need to transform fundamentally and
lastingly society, yet through a different approach. On the one hand, revolution
connotes sudden, drastic and far-reaching change, whereas reform implies the
notion of gradual and progressive change.
Within reformative curriculum interests, attention is given to the number of
people and things that can be affected by corporate decisions, which far exceed
sha eholde s a d top e e uti es i te ests. Fo i sta e, as see i the ase of
Enron, fraud, mismanagement and profiteering not only affected the lives of
workers, but also those of their families. Similarly, the consequences of narrow
conceptions of leadership action might affect the health of a greater number of
people than shareholders and top executives as illustrated by the diethylstilbestrol
(DES) tragedy (Apfel and Fisher, 1984). Currently, the economic and social impact
of the subprime crisis is being felt far beyond the sphere of corporate finance. On
a global scale, such misconducts and overconfidence in the invisible hand of the
free market economy (Smith, 1776) tarnish the reputation and compromise the
integrity of the whole business community. So, what counts within these
curriculum interests is to promote the view of leadership practice as operating
purposefully, in the best interests of the wider population.
Evidence indicates that, within reformative curriculum interests, the topic of
leadership is viewed as a catalyst, through which MBA participants can rethink
their expectations about business life and role as leaders in a capitalist society.
Based on the magnitude of inequalities in this world resulting from the expansion
of unbridled or unaccountable forms of business practice, leadership reality
appears to be essentially biased. For instance, an English lecturer emphasized the
importance of inequalities of income and wealth which are widening in market
economies and becoming a real threat to democracy because the interests of
business organisations and everyone else are increasingly diverging. In response to
this situatio , he a gued that the o ept of leade ship ust e f eed f o the
usi ess ethos a d ust e taught as a ability to break the old paradigm of
doing business and replace it by something more in tune with the demands of
so iet .
Similarly, a French lecturer insisted on the fact that we live in a world where social,
cultural and economic inequalities have be o e too o ious a d
hat is
e pe ted f o leade ship is to e a atal st fo a alte ati e p oje t fo so iet .
When prompted to specify the kind of society she wants to see she replied
o iousl , a fai e so iet , sho i g solida it
ith people a d eing more
hu a . Fo these t o le tu e s, the heto i of ha ge o tai ed i te t ooks
and thrown around by management consultants is meaningless. Leading change
requires something higher than just maximising corporate profits and satisfying
MBA participa ts ate ialisti a itio s. It should e di e ted to a d aki g the
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 16 of 21
workplace a more democratic place, truly committed to sustainability and
seriously involved in fulfilling human needs.
The relationship between reformative curriculum interests and critical a priori
interests offered by Habermas (1972) has been established on the basis that they
both call for self-reflection and self-determination as an essential means to deal
effectively with meta-issues, such as capitalism, democracy and human freedom.
More specifically, both interests aim to secure freedom from reified forces, such
as market forces, and conditions of distorted communication, such as the
dominant discourses in MBA programmes, which take as given the principles of
the free market economy. In pursuing critical a priori interests, reformative
lecturers are actively engaged in influencing participants to reconceptualise their
assumptions and beliefs about the purpose of leadership action in the light of
critical theory. By this means, the study of leadership is clearly engaged towards
supporting an emancipatory project for people and society.
Conclusion
In the light of the methodological challenge posed by the nature of this inquiry the
analytical outcomes of this study need to be handled with some caution, notably
in regard to the issues of validity and reliability. For instance, the number of
informants and the typology of the settings involved in this study limit the extent
to which the findings can be generalised to other settings. A second limitation has
to do with the biased nature of social research (Giddens, 1976) and the
perspective that this study does not allow global or definitive statements about
the beliefs and assumptions of MBA lecturers. A third limitation derives from the
idea that a a of seei g is also a a of ot seei g (Poggi, 1965 p.284) from
which it is doubtful that this study has explored every kind of curriculum interests
in leadership.
Despites these limitations, this study provides research-based evidence of the
prevailing interests in the teaching of leadership in MBA curricula. The first key
outcome of this study has been the substantiation of the problematic nature of
leadership at an MBA curriculum level. By drawing upon the theory of human
knowledge interests developed by Jürgen Habermas and data generated from the
empirical research conducted in five MBA schools it has been possible to uncover
a d o eptualise th ee diffe e t le tu e s u i ulu i te ests i leade ship.
Even though this conceptualisation does not exhaust all the possibilities of
knowledge in relation to leadership, it nevertheless provides insight into the kinds
of societal projects lecturers are keen to support through what they try to achieve
with the topic of leadership and MBA participants.
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 17 of 21
The second key outcome of this study highlights the significant proportion of MBA
lecturers driven by idiosyncratic and reformative curriculum interests. This finding
suggests that the majority of the MBA lecturers are not typically driven by
performative curriculum interests, thereby undermining the argument that
instrumental rationality might be the only ontology in MBA curricula. Therefore,
although leade ship studies ight ha e ee t pi all d a o a a o a ge of
functionalist theories, using positivist methodologies and producing quantitative
fi di gs (Collinson and Grint, 2005), it would be mistaken to assume that MBA
lecturers developed a unitary kind of curriculum interests in leadership that would
be essentially positivist in nature.
The third key outcome of this study relates to the very small number of lecturers
driven by reformative curriculum interests. From a societal perspective, this
finding suggests that only a minority of MBA lecturers have their prevailing
interests in the teaching of leadership driven by critical a priori interests. This
finding suggests that the majority of these lecturers are not seriously engaged in
providing participants with an understanding of leadership that could effectively
challenge the project of bureaucratic-managerial society. As such, the chances for
MBA participants to be confronted with a full understanding of leadership are very
limited and the overall level of criticality in relation to leadership encountered by
MBA participants might be lower than it should be.
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 18 of 21
References
Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H. (2001). Making Sense of Management: A Critical
Introduction. London: Sage Publications
Apfel, R.J. and Fisher, S.M. (1984). To Do No Harm: Diethylstilbestrol and the Dilemmas of
Modern Medicine. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Apple, M.W. (1990). Ideology and Curriculum. Routledge: London
Barnett, R. (1994). The Limits of Competence. Buckingham: Open University Press
Barnett, R. and Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education.
Maidenhead: Open University Press
Beck, R.N. (1979). Handbook in Social Philosophy. New York, NY: Macmillan
Bickerstaffe, G. (2005). Which MBA?: Making the Right Choice of Executive Education.
London: The Economist Intelligence Unit
Bickerstaffe, G. (2007). Which MBA?: Making the Right Choice of Executive Education.
London: The Economist Intelligence Unit
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and
the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York, NY: Basic Books
Burns, J.M. (2003). Transforming Leadership: A New Pursuit of Happiness. New York:
Grove/Atlantic, Inc.
Bush, T. and Glover, D. (2004). Leadership Development: Evidence and Beliefs. Lincoln
(UK): National College for School Leadership
Clarke, J. and Newman, J.E. (1997). The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in
the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2003). Research Methods in Education. London:
RoutledgeFalmer
Collinson, D. and Grint, K. (2005). 'Editorial: The Leadership Agenda', Leadership 1 (1): 5-9.
Crainer, S. and Dearlove, D. (1998). Gravy Training: Inside the Shadowy World of Business
Schools. London: Capstone
Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. London: Sage Publications
Dehler, G.E., Welsh, A. and Lewis, M.W. (2001). 'Critical Pedagogy in the 'New Paradigm'',
Management Learning 32 (4): 493-511.
Denzin, N.K. (1970). The Research Act in Sociology: A. Theoretical Introduction to
Sociological Methods. London: Butterworths
Elmuti, D., Minnis, W. and Abebe, M. (2005). 'Does education have a role in developing
leadership skills?' Management Decision 43 (7/8): 1018-1031.
Engwall, L. and Zamagni, V. (1998). 'Introduction', in: L. Engwall, and V. Zamagni (eds.),
Management Education in Historical Perspective. Manchester: Manchester University
Press.
Foster, W. (1989). 'Toward a Critical Practice of Leadership', in: J. Smyth (Ed.) Critical
Perspectives on Educational Leadership, pp. 39-63. London: Falmer.
Gabriel, Y. (2005). 'MBA and the Education of Leaders: The New Playing Fields of Eton?'
Leadership 1 (2): 147-163.
Giddens, A. (1976). New Rules of Sociological Method: a Positive Critique of Interpretative
Strategies. London: Hutchinson
Gill, R. (2006). Theory and Practice of Leadership. London: Sage Publications
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 19 of 21
Gini, A. (1998). 'Moral Leadership and Business Ethics', in: J.B. Ciulla (Ed.) Ethics, The Heart
of Leadership, pp. 25-42. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R.E. and McKee, A. (2003). 'Primal Leadership', in: J.M. Kouzes (Ed.)
Business Leadership, pp. 44-59. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Grace, M. (2003). Origins of Leadership: The Etymology of Leadership. Guadalajara,
Jalisco, Mexico:
Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power
and Greatness and greatness. Mulwah, NJ: Paulist Press
Grey, C. and French, R. (1996). 'Rethinking Management Education: An Introduction', in:
R. French, and C. Grey (eds.), Rethinking Management Education. London: Sage.
Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest Science and Politics.
London: Heinemann
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann
Hay, A. and Hodgkinson, M. (2008). 'More Success than Meets the Eye: A Challenge to
Critiques of the MBA', Management Learning 39 (21): 21-40.
Held, D. (1980). Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkhaimer to Habermas. Los Angeles, CA:
University of California Press
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions,
and Organizations Across Nations. London: Sage Publications
Kouzes, J.M. and Posner, B.Z. (1987). The Leadership Challenge: How to Keep Getting
Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations. New York: Jossey-Bass
Locke, R.R. (1989). Management and Higher Education Since 1940: The Influence of
America and Japan on West Germany, Great Britain, and France.. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Luxemburg, R. (1973). Reform or Revolution. New York, NY: Pathfinder
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester:
Manchester University Press
MBAinfo.com (2006). Database Search. http://www.mbainfo.com/index.html. WebInfoCo
Mellahi, K. (2000). 'The Teaching of Leadership on UK MBA Programmes: A Critical
Analysis from an International Perspective', Journal of Management Development 19 (4):
297-308.
Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers
ODE (2003). Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
Pfeffer, J. (1993). 'The Ambiguity of Leadership', in: M. Matteson, and J. Ivancevich (eds.),
Management and Organizational Behavior Classics. Homewood: Irwin.
Pfeffer, J. and Fong, C.T. (2002). 'The End of the Business School? Less Success Than Meets
the Eye', Academy of Management Learning and Education 1 (1): 78-95.
Poggi, G. (1965). 'A Main Theme of Contemporary Sociological Analysis: Its Achievements
and Limitations', British Journal of Sociology 16 (4): 263-294.
Reed, M. and Anthony, P.D. (1992). 'Professionalising Management and Managing
Professionalisation: British Management in the 1980s', Journal of Management Studies 29
(5): 591-613.
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. and O'Connor, W. (2003). 'Carrying out Qualitative Analysis', in: J.
Ritchie, and J. Lewis (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice, pp. 219-262. London: Sage
Publications.
Roberts, J. (1996). 'Management Education and the Limits of Technical Rationality: The
Conditions and Consequences of Management Practice', in: R. French, and C. Grey (eds.),
Rethinking Management Education, pp. 54-75. London: Sage.
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 20 of 21
Rosen, D.M. (1984). 'Leadership Systems in World Cultures', in: B. Kellerman (Ed.)
Leadership: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Rost, J.C. (1993). Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. New York, NY: Praeger
Publishers
Schön, D.A. (1984). 'Leadership as Reflection-in-Action', in: T.J. Sergiovanni, and J.E.
Corbally (eds.), Leadership and Organizational Culture: New Perspectives on
Administrative Theory and Practice, pp. 36-63. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Sinclair, A. (2005). 'Teaching Leadership Critically to MBAs: Experiences From Heaven and
Hell', Management Learning 38 (4): 458-472.
Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books
Starkey, K. and Tempest, S. (2005). 'The Future of the Business School: Knowledge
Challenges and Opportunities', Human Relations 58 (1): 61-82.
Steffy, B.D. and Grimes, A.J. (1992). 'Personnel/Organisational Psychology: A Critique of
the Discipline', in: M. Alvesson, and H. Willmott (eds.), Critical Management Studies.
London: Sage publications.
Steger, M.B. (1997). The Quest for Evolutionary Socialism: Eduard Bernstein and Social
Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Storey, J. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. Harvester
Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempsted
Thomas, M.R. (1998). Conducting Educational Research: A Comparative View. London:
Bergin and Garvey
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York, NY: Free
Press
Williams, S. (2000). Management and Leadership Teaching: Present Trends and Future
Demand. Lancaster: Lancaster University Management School
Management Learning February 2010 vol. 41 no. 1 21-36
MBA Le tu e s Cu i ulu
I te ests i Leade ship – E.J. Garcia – © ML 2009 – Page 21 of 21