Emerging commons: Cooperative housing in Switzerland

CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios Autumn Special Issue (2024) https://doi.org/10.15847/cct.34674 Received: 16/02/2024; Accepted: 06/11/2024 ISSN: 2182-3030 ERC: 123787/2011 Funding: UIDB/03127/2020 © 2024: Author(s). Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND Emerging commons: Cooperative housing in Switzerland Claudia Sanchez-Bajo1 Abstract Access to quality and affordable housing is a growing challenge, and civil society has responded with participatory and self-managed housing experiences. Housing cooperatives in Switzerland belong to this phenomenon. Polanyi’s double movement theory and Ostrom’s work on the commons are employed to investigate the motivations and practices of self-managed cooperative housing members in Geneva and Zurich. Following the case study methodology, findings show that the main motivation of cooperative members is to decommodify housing. Common practices include sharing and solidarity-based practices, mutual learning, flexibility for member entry and exit, and general assembly decisions about financial and environmental sustainability. Groups build common practices to access funding, knowledge and solidarity through multi-stakeholder networks, in particular non-profit architects. As trust in self-managed practices increases, they are able to engage in sustainable innovation. Adoption and replication make their housing experiences scalable, configuring a model in concept and practice. As a result of the increase in experience and reputation, members of housing cooperatives become advocates of affordable housing in Swiss referenda. Ostrom’s notion of commons, bundle of rights and nesting can provide valuable contributions in urban sociology research on the commons, necessary for building decommodified affordable housing. Keywords: affordable housing, housing models, housing cooperatives, commons 1 University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: claudia.sanchezbajo [at] gmail.com 24 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Introduction Access to affordable housing is becoming increasingly challenging in the global context. The 2008 Global Financial Crisis has further compounded the previous three decades of policy shift towards deregulation of social housing, which has significantly reduced the efficacy of both social and economic instruments designed to address housing needs (Austin, 2003; Tummers, 2016; Desmond, & Gershenson, 2016; Aglietta & Timbeau, 2017; Pittini, 2018; UNECE, 2014). Switzerland illustrates the policy shift encouraging home ownership and the commodification of rent-setting arrangements (Kemp, 2000, in Lawson, 2009, p. 61). Since the 2008 crisis, housing cooperatives have multiplied in Europe (Pittini, 2018). Many self-managed housing experiences have been built bottom up by civil society groups in a voluntary and decentralized manner (Wendt, 2018; Foster & Iaone, 2019; Vey, 2016; Vidal, 2024; Koch, 2021; Khatibi, 2022; Balmer & Bernet, 2015; Balmer & Gerber, 2018; Kakegai, 2021). Some experiences have been adopted and transferred cross-border, such as Mietshäuser Syndikat in Germany (Hölzl, 2022). Other challenges include the need for infrastructure adaptation in view of an ecological transition. Last but not least, vulnerable communities may face barriers due to race, ethnicity, gender or socio-economic status (Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University 2022, p. 3). The COVID-19 pandemic has made the need for affordable housing more apparent (Shoag 2019; OECD, 2020; Shroyer & Gaitán, 2019; Florida, 2019). Inquiries regarding the emergence of these phenomena hint at the rise in self-managed housing since the 2008 crisis, arguing that the latter has prompted civil society to engage in collaborative partnerships (Czischke, 2018) or community-led arrangements (Mullins, 2018). Besides, the growing number of initiatives is hypothesised as the internationalization of social movements in the age of social media (Mullins & Moore, 2018). Studies on collaborative or community-led housing have led to the exploration of practices at various levels: the organisation at the micro-level, multiple stakeholders’ partnerships at the meso-level and policy and welfare regimes at the macro-level (Mullins & Moore, 2018). The phenomenon is presented in the following three typologies: a) cooperative self-managed housing, according to the level of participation and inclusion (Tummers, 2016); b) collaborative housing, according to the internal level of collaboration and with external stakeholders (Czischke, Carriour & Lang, 2020); and c) a regime of sharing and tenure, according to value orientation, such as anti-capitalist, non-binary or multiethnic perspectives. Nevertheless, the third methodology does not facilitate the analysis of the enactment of values or the extent of participation in internal management processes (Griffith, Jepma & Savini, 2024, p. 138). As early as 2009, Lawson had already advocated for further research “at the micro-level operation of cooperatives and their sense of distributive social responsibility, the role of informal urban networks in policy making and the role of the local state in land and housing policy” (Lawson, 2009, p. 46, 64). The case study methodology (Yin, 2017) is used to explore motivations and practices expressed and conveyed by the members of housing cooperatives. Section 1, on theory, is followed by Section 2, on methodology. Section 3 presents the findings of the qualitative analysis, followed by concluding remarks, references, Annex 1, with key dates and awards of visited cooperatives, Annex 2, with photos taken during the visits, and, and Annex 3, with the list of shared spaces and practices. 1. Theory Neoliberalism has promoted housing as a commodity and individual housing ownership as an investment vehicle for wealth (Aalbers, 2016, 2017; Bourdieu, 2005, pp. 10-12, 90, 224-225; Dewilde & De Decker, 2016, pp. 2-3). This approach has led to market failure with increasing inefficiency, inequality and divergence between offer and demand in housing. “The dismantling of housing policy leads to decentralised solutions” at lower levels, such as the cantons in Switzerland (Balmer & Gerber, 2018, p. 369). Initiatives towards decommodification are observed, and the second or counter-Polanyian movement would provide an explanation for the current efforts of civil society to decommodify housing (Capoccia, 2015; Lang, & Novy, 2014; Wijburg, 2020). A case study of five Swiss cities’ policies on non-profit housing shows that decommodification occurs at the intersection of the economic, socio-political and ecological spheres, with the aim of achieving autonomy from the dominant property-driven economy (Balmer & Gerber, 2018, p. 381). Balmer and Gerber conducted interviews 25 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) with representatives of public administration departments, associated organisations, and political parties (Balmer & Gerber, 2018, p. 368), but not with residents - owners themselves, as this article does, allowing autonomy to be understood as a motivation and goal constructed through commoning (Stavrides, 2015, p. 12; 17). This article draws from Polanyi and Ostrom to explore housing cooperatives members’ motivations and practices. Following Polanyi, decommodification should not be viewed as a matter of being in or out of the market but of the market society. First, a market should not be confused with the current market economy that transforms land, labour and money into fictitious commodities (Polanyi, [1944] 2001, p. 76). The removal of fictitious commodities concerns only the current market; “the end of market society means in no way the absence of markets” (Polanyi, [1944] 2001, p. 260). A market economy can only function in a market society defined as a society shaped to strive first and foremost for profit (Polanyi, [1944] 2001, p. 60; 257). where social relations are embedded in the economic system (Polanyi, [1944] 2001, pp. 257-258). In a counter-movement towards decommodification, the market economy is reembedded in social relations, instituting a “human economy, then, embedded and enmeshed in institutions, economic and noneconomic” (Polanyi, 1957, p. 250). Society institutes the economy through patterns of reciprocity, redistribution and exchange, and the economy may be defined by the pattern that is prevalent. In a human economy, reciprocity uses redistribution and exchange as subordinate patterns (Polanyi, 1957, pp. 253-255). In The Great Transformation, Polanyi discusses cooperatives, cites Villages of Cooperation and mentions the Builders’ trade union (Polanyi, [1944] 2001, p. 177). The practical resolution of problems of everyday life, such as housing, could be achieved by transcending the limitations of the market economy, without sacrificing either individual freedom or social solidarity (Polanyi, [1944] 2001, p. 176). Efforts towards affordable housing include housing cooperatives as a legal, non-speculative form of shared home ownership that is self-managed. Cooperatives are characterized by joint ownership, mutual help, democratic control and management, adhering to the Cooperative Principles.1 Cooperative housing is a type of housing where property is jointly owned. It empowers member families and residents as they are responsible for their decisions on the conditions, cost and quality of their housing (Sazama, 2000, p. 574). Housing cooperatives self-decide collectively their own norms and rules in terms of entry, participation, leaving the cooperative, usage and sharing, management and alienation or disposal. In addition to offering shared spaces that are self-managed, cooperatives aim to provide five housing conditions: affordable housing in terms of cost, sustainable housing in terms of long-term supply within the housing market, access to housing especially for vulnerable residents, housing ownership and rent control to prevent eviction and exclusion, and good governance practices (Skelton, 2002). Research shows limitations related to a) the level and type of capital that members may have to fully take part, b) regulatory constraints, and c) path dependent trajectories leading to re-commodification (Sørvoll, 2013, p. 25; 417; 469; Sørvoll & Bengtsson, 2018; Ferreri & Vidal, 2022). Other studies have shown a large array of benefits such as tenure security and higher levels of social cohesion (Haffner & Brunner, 2014; Davis, 2006, Gulliver et al., 2013; Lawton, 2014). Elinor Ostrom affirmed that “some of the most imaginative work on enhancing urban neighborhoods relates to helping tenants of public housing projects acquire joint ownership and management of these projects. This is a shift from government ownership to a common - property arrangement” (Cole & McGinnis, 2015, p. 53). Building on Polanyi’s work, Vincent Ostrom links democracy to the idea of the commons, while Elinor Ostrom builds a theory on the commons through the most comprehensive number of case studies to date, which won her the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2009. First, Ostrom explains how the capacity of actors to self-manage their situation by working together reduces the risk of a “tragedy of the commons” as posited by Hardin (1968). Second, Elinor and Vincent Ostrom advise to expand the concept of the commons to housing and urban renewal (Cole & McGinnis, 2015, p. 53; 104). To Ostrom, embeddedness is a strategy for coproduction and a better means to solve resource problems, by enhancing the capacity of those directly involved in local conditions to organize themselves into nested enterprises, improving the residents’ ability to address their own needs (Cole & McGinnis, 2015, p. 56). Similarly to Polanyi, embeddedness entails social action that becomes embedded 1 These are the 7 principles approved in the Statement of Cooperative Identity of the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA); they are: 1) voluntary and open membership, 2) democratic member control, 3) members’ economic participation, 4) autonomy, 5) education, training and information, 6) cooperation among cooperatives, and 7) concern for Community. https://ica.coop/ en/whats-co-op/co-operative-identity-values-principles, and https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative-identity/ 26 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) through the formation and management of institutional arrangements. Third, for Elinor Ostrom, a conceptual model is useful to “make precise assumptions about a limited number of variables in a theory that scholars use to examine the formal consequences of these specific assumptions about the motivation of actors and the structure of the situation they face” (Ostrom, 2009). Elinor Ostrom, in her Nobel Prize lecture, proposes a Social-Ecological System (SES), as seen in Figure 1 below, to guide the analysis of common pool resources, explaining that boundedly rational actors interact through monitoring, conflict, lobbying and self-organisation. Resources are placed on the left, while results with impact on governance and users are displayed on the right. Outcomes are mentioned in terms of sustainability, such as the regeneration of biodiversity and the resilience of an ecological system. Both interactions and outcomes in the action-situation box are separated from users. However, in practice, actors self-manage the situation, deciding and monitoring their own rules and norms. Figure 1. Elinor Ostrom Social-Ecological System (2009, p. 23) Elinor Ostrom’s coproduction model, first conceptualized in 1981, refers to a polycentric system that is exemplified by decentralized social action increasing the endogenous levels of trust and reciprocity (Parks et al., 1981; Ostrom, 1990; 1996; 2005). Rules and norms are established and reinforced to the extent that they are shared and maintained through coproduction (Ostrom, 2005, p. 65). Polycentric governance is linked to the concept of nesting because in successful commons, if a common pool resource is closely linked to another large one, governance structures are ‘nested’ with each other at one or more levels, and common principles of management run throughout like patterns. (Helfrich, 2012). Vincent Ostrom connects democracy and non-profit cooperatives in the arrangements in local communities, from conception to feasibility studies, to physical works, where the longer term results depend on how their enterprise is led and managed. If operated as a nonprofit cooperative enterprise, generated profits would turn into economic returns to present and future property holders (Ostrom, Tiebout & Warren, 1961, p. 209; 211). Thus, a commons is neither a form of ownership, nor the resource itself or pure management. A commons is about self-managed commoning, understood as social practices “actively produced, maintained and expanded through cooperative, collective action” (Helfrich, 2012). For Bollier and Helfrich (2015), a commons creates a system to manage shared resources through acts of mutual help, conflict and mediation, negotiation and dialogue, communication and experimentation. Besides, a commons is defined through bundles of rights. These cover five types of rights that members using a common pool resource might enjoy: 1) access - the right to enter a specified property; 2) withdrawal - the right to harvest specific products from a resource; 3) management the right to transform the resource (such as land and habitat) and regulate internal use patterns; 4) exclusion - the right to decide who has access, withdrawal or management rights; and 5) alienation - the right to dispose of or sell any of the other four rights (Ostrom, 2009, p. 419; Schlager and Ostrom, 1992). 27 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) 2. Methodology Lawson, Haffner and Oxley (2010) propose to study real world experiences in order to interpret and recontextualize the housing phenomena by looking for a plausible and justifiable set of explanatory concepts (Lawson, Haffner, & Oxley, 2010, p. 5). Guided by a constructivist epistemology, this research analyses in particular “the action and interaction strategies of the actors in the field, whereby special emphasis is laid on their intentions and goals” (Corbin & Strauss, 2015, pp. 158-159). The exploration of motivations and practices in housing cooperatives in Geneva and Zurich follows the case study method (Yin, 2017). There are different types of active cooperatives in the housing sector. Two of them are noteworthy in Switzerland: construction or building cooperatives2 and housing cooperatives of dwellers. The present study focuses on the latter in Geneva and Zurich: La Rencontre, CODHA Rigaud, OuVerture, Luciole, and Kalkbreite (see Annex 1 for the dates of foundation, construction and awards). Visits took place in September 2023. Interviewees gave informed consent to interviews, to the visit to the cooperative premises and to the recording of dialogues. Primary, first-hand notes and visual data, photographs and videos were collected during the visits. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a 12-question questionnaire, with an open dialogue to elicit information regarding the participants’ life experiences, motivations and practices. The full text of each interview was shared with the interviewee for feedback. I stayed for a short time at the residence of a group registered as a housing cooperative and expecting to enter their dwelling in 2027, as well as at the Kalkbreite Guesthouse in Zurich as visitor. Interviews were coded and analysed with the Atlas.ti CAQDAS (computer aided qualitative data analysis software) applying grounded theory methodology (Friese, 2014; Corbin & Strauss, 2015; Strauss, 1987). 3. Findings 3.1 Overview of cooperative housing The Swiss welfare regime is characterised by a mixture of liberal and conservative traits, and its housing system is dominated by private for-profit rentals (Lawson, 2009). Swiss are renters in their majority. “At the end of 2021, 2.4 million households in Switzerland (61%) lived in a rented or cooperative dwelling” (FSO, 2023 a). The urban system of Switzerland comprises 55 core cities and their respective functional areas and is characterized by a high degree of integration and polycentricity, which mirrors the country’s federal and decentralized political structure (Rérat, 2012, p. 119). Peter Gurtner, former director of the Swiss Federal Office for Housing, and later president of the Bond Issuing Cooperative, explains that there is no legal definition of social housing, but institutions that “apply the cost-rent principle and respect the principles of a charter, as well as fulfil legal obligations” are recognised as such (Gurtner, 2014, p. 32). Cooperative housing is also called affordable, nonprofit, not-for-profit, and of general interest.3 Swiss affordable housing provisions consist mainly of housing cooperatives, diverse income levels and lifestyles (FOH, 2006, pp. 37–39). Rental expenses in cooperatives are lower than other rental rates, from 20 to 30%, reaching 60% lower in Zurich and Geneva.4 The participation of low-income members in cooperatives is supported through cost-rent housing and rent subsidies (Balmer & Gelber, 2018, p. 365). In 2014, there were 1700 housing cooperatives, with fewer than two dozen owning more than 1000 dwellings each (Gurtner, 2014). The opening in 2014 of the Kalkbreite cooperative raised widespread interest after winning the public competition with their proposal. It is a building area with 88 flats organized in clusters, ‘joker spaces’ that can be added on, communal areas as well as cultural, catering, retail and service premises for 256 residents, providing 200 jobs. The Swiss Federal Constitution does recognise the right to housing but this is not legally binding, while cantons do not incorporate this right into their constitutions, instead handing over responsibility to 2 The Federation of construction or building cooperatives (Baugenossenschaften) supports builders through training and knowledge. A political advisory committee has been established to promote the value of low-cost housing on a cooperative basis with bourgeois parties and parliamentary groups. https://www.wohnen-schweiz.ch/fr/association/conseil-politique and https://www.wohnen-schweiz.ch/files/pdf1/rapport-annuel_2022-v2.pdf, p.9 3 d’utilité publique, in French 4 Armoup, Geneva, https://www armoup ch/information/faq 28 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) the municipalities (Drilling et al., 2021). Cantons play a key role in offering the right to use public land or emphyteusis. Some municipal authorities prioritise non-profit initiatives, which are subsequently financed by private actors, including cooperatives (Rérat, 2012, p. 120), but this only applies to publicly owned land. Today, housing cooperatives play a significant role in the supply of affordable housing, yet a modest one in the overall Swiss housing sector. They are present across the country but more significantly in the large urban centres, as shown in Figure 2. They represent 22.9 % of all owners of rented dwellings in Zurich from 2020-2022 (FSO, 2023b). Figure. 2 Locations and numbers of housing cooperatives in Switzerland 2022 Source: (FOH 2022) https://genossenschaften.wbg-schweiz.ch/ There are few systematic studies of Swiss housing cooperatives. The first comprehensive study since 1969, based on censuses and a survey of 1400 housing cooperatives, was conducted by Peter Schmid (Schmid, 2005). Swiss housing cooperatives are considered non-profit organisations with the social purpose of providing the population with affordable housing.5 However, the mission of each cooperative, which is not only economic but usually includes a social, socio-cultural and/or political mission, is defined by the member-owners themselves. The five cantons of Zurich, Bern, Lucerne, Basel City and Geneva account for 70% of all Swiss cooperative housing. According to a Swiss Labour Force Survey of 2002, persons with lower incomes tend to reside in cooperatives, which then contribute to the provision of housing for low-income households to a substantial degree. The average size of a cooperative board was 5.8 members (Schmid, 2005). There was a predominance of small cooperatives, facilitating the realization of the objective of collective ownership and communal living by members with little equity. A significant number of small cooperatives had been set up in the 1980s and 1990s, characterized by a higher level of member involvement, bringing about more social and community benefits and facilities, and showing a greater appreciation of the cooperative principles, compared to those established earlier (Schmid, 2005). A newer study confirms these characteristics as a new generation of housing cooperatives since 2000 (Duyne Barenstein & Koch, 2022, p. 5). 5 Peter Schmid, President of ABZ and the Swiss Housing Association, Zurich section, summary of unpublished Master thesis at the Association Management Institute of the University of Fribourg. 29 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) 3.2 Brief history The first Swiss housing cooperatives emerged between the 19th century and early 20th century. The first attempt to establish a housing cooperative, which ultimately proved unsuccessful, was initiated by Collin-Bernouilli in 1867 (Ruedin, 1994, p. 4). Switzerland has not been immune to international trends in public policy, whether in the 19th century, with the rise of the cooperative movement, or more recently with the trend towards a reduced role for the state (Lawson, 2009, p. 61). Sazama mentions a similar situation in the United States, where cooperative housing was first led by trade unions seeking decommodification and by ethnic groups of immigrants (Sazama, 2000, p. 1; 576578; 599). In the US, some high-income families were among the pioneers in establishing housing cooperatives but only those comprising immigrants or workers were able to survive the 1930s Great Depression (Sazama, 1996, pp. 1-2). When the need arose after the First and Second World Wars, Swiss housing cooperatives contributed to reconstruction. As the socio-economic structure evolved and part of the working class attained middle-class status, their membership became more diverse, including the middle class (Duyne Barenstein & Koch 2022; Duyne Barenstein, Schindler & Schlinzig, 2023). From less than 1500 cooperatives in 1919, the number grew to around 6500 in 1945, and 9123 between 1946 and 1960, the peak of the movement (Curtat, 2013). It was only in the 21st century that they have regained ground (Duyne Barenstein, Schindler & Schlinzig 2023, p. 584). The current legal framework is provided by the Federal Law of 2003, offering three federal policy instruments, a third of which in direct support is suspended due to fiscal constraints (Swiss Confederation, 2003). The two others provide indirect support through guarantees, to facilitate the dissemination, exchange, and mutual learning by supporting the activities of the non-profit housing associations in the fields of training, advice and information. Additionally, it informs about exemplary housing projects for their innovation in terms of sustainability, quality, utility value and location, thereby increasing the visibility of sustainable practices and the awards received by cooperatives. From 2000 to 2023, as shown in Table 1, cooperatives grew to the rate of 7. 2%, higher than in previous periods (6.0% and 6.6%), with the exception of post WWII (FSO, 2023c). Table 1. Cooperatives: type of owners of rented dwellings. Growth by construction period Source: FSO 2023c. 3.3 Social mobilization for housing as commons Civil society, in both French and German speaking regions, has been mobilizing for housing cooperatives. Interviewees emphasized recent referenda in favour of more cooperative and affordable housing: in Zurich, in 2011 (successful), nation-wide (failed) and Geneva (legally approved but not yet voted). In the second half of the 20th century, housing cooperatives had not played a significant role in politics (Koch, 2021, p. 28). In recent decades, as the market failed to provide affordable housing and the federal state withdrew from supply-side policies, social mobilisation has led to many citizens’ initiatives at the local level (Balmer and Gerber, 2018). Among them, many new housing cooperatives of residents have been created, enjoying high public support (Duyne Barenstein and Koch, 2022, p. 7; Balmer and Gerber, 2018). Schmid (2005) establishes a connection between the newer and smaller cooperatives and increased member engagement in cooperative values. In November 2011, a local referendum in Zurich resulted 30 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) in three-quarters of the population approving a mandate that affordable nonprofit housing should reach 33% of the city’s rental stock by 2050 (Hofer, 2019, in Khatibi, 2022, p. 3). In February 2020, a nation-wide referendum was voted in favour in five Cantons, but rejected by a majority due mainly to the rural vote (Koch, 2021). This was followed by 8200 signatures for a new referendum ‘For + housing in Cooperatives’ in the Canton of Geneva, approved by the Council of States.6 Lately, 90% of participants in the Geneva 2050 Consultation supported housing cooperatives.7 This should be put in the context of a broader debate on sustainable transition (Swiss Federal Council, 2021). Indeed, many of the cooperatives’ awards highlight innovations in renewable sources, construction, soft mobility, and the use of land. Cooperative members exchange knowledge with academics and the wider civil society in international meetings. In 2015, the first Alternatiba Leman gathered 30,000 participants and hundreds of organisations in Geneva.8 In 2022, the Second Global Housing Cooperatives Symposium took place in Zurich and included a visit to Kalkbreite. Participants came from the USA, UK, Italy, Germany, Switzerland and Asia (Housing Cooperatives International, 2022). Several cantons are approving sustainable measures. A 26 September 2021 vote in Bern was followed by a vote on 15 May 2022 in Zurich with a 67.12% majority approving a constitutional amendment codifying a target to achieve net zero or greenhouse gas emissions. Other cantons are working on similar proposals.9 At the local level, the manner in which civil society strives for a commons may be serendipitous. In Geneva, the cooperative La Rencontre I visited is part of a self-managed neighbourhood. The Community of Residents is called ‘Ilôt 13’. Its head office, the Maison des Habitants (MdH), houses artists’ workshops. During the renovation in the 1980s, the place was handed over still unfinished to the locals, who worked collectively to finish the refreshment area and the Écurie, including interiors, façades, wooden frames and shutters. The City of Geneva provided an initial investment of CHF 500,000, while the residents’ association secured a further CHF 220,000 from Alternative Bank to supplement their own savings, which were invested in equity to the value of CHF 40,000. In April 1986, facing potential demolition, the Fanfare de l’îlot 13 of about twenty musicians began to perform in processions, schools and other venues. Woodwork and repair workshops were set up as ‘Atelier 15bis’. Since October 1986, the MdH Centre has housed workshops in stringed instrument making, screen printing, sculpture, painting, a recording studio, two rehearsal rooms, a dance studio, a carpentry workshop, and a cellar for rock concerts. Decisions are made by consensus. The entire neighbourhood has a General Assembly at the buvette on Mondays and, for that reason, it is closed on that day. There are subgroups for the Internet, for the kitchen, for an oven bread among others (Interviewee, Geneva, 640, p.6). The history of Ilôt 13 goes far back. The Grottes, the area of Geneva where La Rencontre is located, has a long history of labour movements. After being attached to the city of Geneva in 1850, this was a workers’ area. After the meeting of the First International in Geneva in 1867, residents created producers’ and consumers’ cooperatives. By 1928, the local authority had formulated a plan to demolish it and taken steps to prevent any renovation work. In 1971, the local population opposed a plan to transform it into a satellite dormitory suburb and started a collective action to brand the area as a squatters’ camp. The district was subdivided into blocks at the request of the local population, Ilôt 13 being the largest. A video by RTS, the Swiss French speaking television, shows how squatters and cooperative members lived together in 1995.10 As an interviewee explained, their participative renovation and engagement in solar panels, which they built themselves, showed how to inhabit the city in a decommodified manner. Members of the community association and an architect presented the experience to a Conference in 2006 (Gisselbaek, Haefeli & Hollmulle, 2006). Emancipatory practices, reproducing forms of cooperation through sharing, include open areas of crossing, from the inside to the outside. Commoning is a complex process beyond spatial production 6 Marc Moulin, 2022, Genève pourrait multiplier ses logements coopératifs, 17 January, GCHG, 2022, « initiative Pour + de logements en coopérative » reçoit l’aval du Conseil d’Etat; https://www.tdg.ch/geneve-pourrait-multiplier-ses-logements-cooperatifs-964054925612 and https://gchg.ch/linitiative-pour-de-logements-en-cooperative-recoit-laval-du-conseil-detat/ 7 GCHG https://issuu.com/cooperatives_genevoises/docs/labelco-publication-digitale-version-pages 8 Alternatiba Leman, https://web.archive.org/web/20230212180059/https://alternatibaleman.org/. 9 Switzerland: Voters in Canton of Zurich Approve Constitutional Amendment Codifying Net Zero Target, https://www.loc.gov/ item/global-legal-monitor/2022-06-02/switzerland-voters-in-canton-of-zurich-approve-constitutional-amendment-codifying-net-zero-target/. The cantons of Appenzell-Ausserrhoden, Aargau, Geneva, Glarus, and Tessin are considering similar measures. 10 Calame &.Karcher (1995) L’Ilôt 13, video RTS, https://www.rts.ch/archives/tv/culture/viva/7666987-l-ilot-13.html 31 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) whereby “the people involved construct a community of equals because they choose to define at least part of their life autonomously and in common” (Stavrides, 2015, p.12; 17). Stavrides’ view of commoning practices are observable in the history of the Ilôt 13 in Geneva, where the solidaritybased practices are self-managed by the neighbourhood, while in each cooperative they are selfmanaged by the member - dwellers, nested within the former. It should be noted that there are other housing cooperatives in the same Ilôt 13. The social mobilisation that led to the creation of Kalkbreite in 2007 was also neighbourhood based. In 2014, its members moved in. Starting with an old man in the neighbourhood, a small group of five or six people began to meet, reaching the number of 50. They came up with a project called harp – ARPA, responding to two non-negotiable constraints in the public call. The first one was that the 30 tram depots had to stay. This meant they had to build on top of them. The second rule was to offer as many spaces and shops to the neighbourhood as possible. 3.4 National and international exchanges The housing cooperatives visited for this study receive visitors of various types. Many visitors are local and national but there are also international ones through international meetings of cooperatives, architects and policy-makers. In Geneva, Luciole has hosted whole classes of primary, secondary and university students since 2017: “We provide them with information and evidence to encourage a reevaluation of their perceptions of housing, costs and opportunities. However, on each occasion, they express their astonishment at the initiative” (Interviewee, Luciole, Geneva, 936, p.51). Other groups including housing cooperatives have visited this cooperative since 2009. Kalkbreite maintains a committee of volunteers whose role is to guide visitors according to their expressed interests, such as architectural, organisational, or social aspects of the site. For Luciole, the experience of interacting with the Belgian Bouwmeester11 stands out as particularly noteworthy. “He visited Luciole with the objective of exchanging ideas on how to counsel the Belgian government on housing policy. Furthermore, his entire team returned after his visit in October 2023. There were 50 Belgians in the garden, a delegation comprising several teams of public policy experts… I was invited to engage in a discussion with a Belgian lawyer to ascertain the applicability of legal provisions and to have it transcribed for publication in a Belgian construction magazine. However, what I found particularly rewarding was the realisation that our efforts may have a tangible impact on the potential future development of cooperatives in Belgium. It was a highly satisfying experience” (Interviewee, Geneva 936, p.13). In France, the Order of Architects of Ile-de-France organised a seminar on cooperative housing and Zurich on 24 October 2019, and a debate on 21 November 2019. 12 The 2020 Exhibition The Housing Laboratory stated that cooperatives had become a benchmark for residential architecture.13 In 2022 in Barcelona, Swiss representatives of cooperatives met with Spanish local authorities, architects’ cooperatives and the German Goethe Institute to discuss clusters as part of a cooperative model.14 At the 2021 Venice Biennale of Architecture, the exhibition Cooperative Conditions, A Primer on Architecture, Finance and Regulation in Zurich proposed eight conditions to explain the commitment to decommodification, of which the first is sharing, “not only through joint ownership and collective decision-making but also the disposition to share spaces”.15 11 Flemish Government Architect, https ://en wikipedia org/wiki/Flemish_Government_Architect 12 https://www.architectes-idf.org/mag/le-logement-en-france-quelles-perspectives-pour-les-cooperatives 13 “Zurich. Cooperatives reinvent social housing”. 18 October 2019 to 2 March 2020. Cité de l’architecture & du patrimoine https:// www.citedelarchitecture.fr/fr/exposition/zurich-les-cooperatives-reinventent-le-logement-social 14 https://www.model.barcelona/en/round-table-opportunities-regulatory-level-extension-new-housing-models. 15 Cooperative Conditions Exhibition at the Biennale de Venise 2021, https://cooperativeconditions.net/home/introduction#fn-3 32 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) 3.5 Establishing a housing cooperative Members first register the housing cooperative as a legal person, and then look for the right plot of land to build their project. First information about a housing cooperative is found online.16 With regard to the right of disposal, this type of housing is not subject to speculation and cannot be sold for profit. Cooperative members can enter and leave, having the right to withdraw their personal funds and move to another home (cooperative or not). Rents are at cost. Revenue from shops, guesthouses or offices in the cooperative’s properties is reinvested in the cooperative’s mission. The initial rent may appear high due to construction costs, but on average it is 20% lower than the market rate. Interviewees confirmed that their rental costs are around 40 % lower than the market. In Kalkbreite, as in the rest of the neighbourhood, rents have not increased at all since the opening. In the case of La Ciguë in Geneva, part of Ilôt 13, the rent is 55% lower than the market rate according to World Habitat (see Annex 1). In agreement with the former director of the Federal Office for Housing (Gurtner, 2014), and the Swiss Confederation 2024 Action Plan, in its Article 6 (Swiss Federal Council, 2024), interviewees made clear that land access and affordability were major issues to address the housing shortage.17 In 2014, Gurtner had noted that for nonprofit housing “just to maintain the modest market share already requires a tremendous effort(...) The biggest impediment to achieving this lies in the lack of suitable land” (Gurtner, 2014). The trend to promote smaller housing cooperatives continues, sometimes besides a larger one. These are cooperatives built near a larger one for reasons of scale and nesting (Helfrich, 2012). Examples are Luciole and Equilibre that share various systems of car sharing and guest rooms; and OuVerture and Quercus to be built in Presinge (Geneva). A recently approved Localised Neighbourhood Plans (PLQ) in Geneva, a new requirement before obtaining permission to build, highlights the social added value of housing cooperatives for the community, particularly their shared spaces that enhance the quality of life in the neighbourhood, such as artists’ and craftsmen’s studios, community halls, crèches and kindergartens, intergenerational meeting places, and community services to the population at large.18 3.6 Funding a housing cooperative Funding comes from cooperative members, followed by bank loans, their own instituted funds and foundations. Support stems from federal, canton and municipal instruments, in some cases implemented on a fiduciary basis by cooperative federations and nonprofit housing architects. First, projects are funded by cooperative members’ own equity, accounting for 10% of total equity at least. This is followed by credit and/or small loans from a revolving fund.19 The members’ investment20 gives equal power in control and self-management to each member, namely, one person, one vote. Schmid (2005) shows that 90% of all cooperative dwellings of the 78% responding housing cooperatives had benefited from nonprofit funding. About half of these had received support from the federal government. The majority had received support from the public sector during the construction phase, but only a limited number had received federal basic grants after 1975. The most common source of funding has been land with building rights (46%), followed by the repayable federal land grant (41%) and loans from the revolving fund (35%). This is followed by subsidised cantonal and/ or communal loans (19%), loans from the solidarity fund of the Swiss cooperative federation (17%), public sector guarantees (9%), mortgage guarantees (9%) and subsidised cantonal/communal land (6%) (Schmid, 2005). On the basis of members’ equity, a cooperative obtains bank loans. In Zurich, about 80% of the value of local cooperatives is debt, most of it from banks. First mortgages cover 16 For example by ARMOUP in Geneva, https://www.fonder-construire-habiter.ch/ 17 On February 13, 2024, the Swiss Confederation agreed an Action Plan with stakeholders, including cantons, cities, municipalities, the construction sector and non-profit housing associations, to address the housing shortage. The 2024 Plan acknowledges the problem of land availability in its article 6, adding that fiscal constraints limit its ability to intervene directly (Swiss Federal Council, 2024). 18 Presinge PLQ, Geneva City Council. https://www.ge.ch/document/plan-localise-quartier-centre-villageois-presinge-presinge https://ge.ch/sitg/RDPPF/RDPPF-AMENAGEMENT/PLQ/30147REGLEMENT.pdf 19 Kalbreite’s one-time fee to become a member is CHF 200. Any natural and legal person can apply. A cooperative share certificate (nonprofit thus no interest) amounts to CHF 1000. 20 part sociale, in French 33 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) 60-80% of development costs. There has been a Mortgage Guarantee Cooperative since 1956 with the objective of making non-profit buildings more affordable, supported by the federal government through the provision of back-up guarantees21, which serves as additional security for the lender, allowing them to apply more favorable terms due to lower risk. Since 1902, the Zurich Cantonal Bank (ZKB) set a legal obligation to lend to cooperatives. Since 1992, most cooperatives have also received second mortgages from the Pension Fund of the City of Zurich, which finance 14 to 34% of development costs. Both are private institutions, and their lending to cooperatives is backed by the City of Zurich. In Geneva, financing for the cooperative member’s investment can come from the 2nd pillar or a loan from the Canton, repayable over 5 years. In these cases, the first step with members’ equity may be less than 10 % of total equity.22 Cooperatives build their own solidarity funds both within individual cooperatives and at the level of federations, usually collecting 10 CHF per member, like ABZ23 and Kalkbreite in Zurich.24 The Federation of non-profit housing architects and constructors25 provide assistance through three foundations to its members, which must meet the requirements as a non-profit organisation, including the signing of its Ethical Charter.26 At the federal level, since 1990, indirect support is given through federal guarantees to bonds issued by the Swiss Bond Issuing Cooperative - BIC, backed by public federal guarantee. Created in 1990, the BIC is a cooperative whose members are housing cooperatives and other nonprofit builders, with a Central Issuing27 that “raises funds on the financial market (...) through bond issues and private placements. Its issues are guaranteed by the Swiss Confederation, and it has the highest credit rating in the rating guide of the Zürcher Kantonalbank ZKB”28. It issues the bonds carrying AAA rating in its own name, on behalf of its 300 members. The BIC bond process institutional framework is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3. BIC Institutional Framework Source: Gurtner 2014. 21 See https://www.hbg-cch.ch/fr/ Société de cautionnement pour les maîtres d’ouvrage de logements d’utilité publique in French. Hypothekar-Bürgschaftsgenossenschaft in German. 22 https://www.fonder-construire-habiter.ch/comment-financer-les-projets/ 23 “Every ABZ household contributes 5 CHF per month (5.49 USD) to a solidarity fund. The fund finances non-profit housing, social, cultural and ecological projects around the world.” https://www.housinginternational.coop/news/solidarity-at-abz/ 24 Kalbreite members decided to accept both deposits in a fund to support the mission and also a solidarity fund of 10 CHF to support members, that was used during the COVID -19 pandemic, for example. 25 The federation is called Coopératives d’habitation Suisse in French and Wohnbaugenossenschaften Schweiz in German 26 These are the Solidarity Fund, Soliterra and Solinvest. In 1999, the Solidarity Fund became a foundation to which members can donate 10 CHF per dwelling, collecting yearly about 800,000 CHF. It provides grants for relevant projects such as senior housing. The eligibility criteria for loans are identical to those of the Revolving Fund but the Board of Trustees have more leeway to decide which projects to support. 27 It is called EGW in German and CCL in French: see https://www.egw-ccl.ch/fr/portrait/ 28 https://www.egw-ccl.ch/fr/anleihen/ 34 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Since its creation and until January 2024, BIC has issued 96 bonds with a total volume of 8.03 billion CHF.29 The volume of loans shows an upward trend between 1990 and January 2024.30 Interest rates on these loans are one percent lower than fixed-rate mortgages of the same term and tend to be slightly lower than all-in costs. The guarantees cover up to 90% of the cost. This indirect federal instrument provides a working capital fund managed by the non-profit housing federations operating under performance mandates. The bonds in question are in high demand due to the federal guarantee (FOH, 2006, p. 60). In addition, there is a Revolving Fund managed on a fiduciary basis by the major Swiss federations of nonprofit architects and cooperatives.31 Moreover, cooperatives work both with savings banks and a renovation fund earmarked for maintenance and repairs that is automatically funded by a fixed percentage of the rent. 3.7 Ethical Charters Since the enactment of the Federal Law of 2003, it is obligatory that all nonprofit housing adheres to ethical charters. The Charter of non-profit housing constructors in Switzerland, signed in 2004, declares housing as a basic human need and its access at “an affordable price that is adapted to the needs of the individual is a fundamental right for every individual and every family”.32 The Wohnbaugenossenschaften Schweiz - WBG33, the Federation of Swiss Housing Cooperatives, requires the signature of its Ethical Charter to be able to apply for any funding.34 WBG has two types of members: 1000 full members that are non-profit housing cooperatives, nonprofit housing architects and constructors plus foundations in 9 regions, and 20 associate members, mainly communities and public institutions. In Geneva, the 80 affiliated cooperatives to GCHG have signed its 2005 Ethical Charter.35 In 2020, they led a contest on how well members align with the Charter in four categories: living together, architecture, ecology and utopia for innovation and good living for the future.36 It had three juries consisting of a) experts chaired by Geneva State Councillor Hodgers, b) students of the Hautes écoles Spécialisées (HES) and c) the public through an internet vote. Furthermore, every housing cooperative has its own ethical charter, which in turn may evolve in time. Some of the cooperatives we visited have their Ethical Charter at the entrance. In Geneva, Equilibre, the larger cooperative sister of Luciole, has had two versions of its Ethical Charters, the first version in 2015, and the second in 2020. The former mentions quality of life, sustainability through reduced impact on resources, respect for the environment, renewable energy and resource conservation, participation and cohesion through integration, bonding, ethics, different generations, and respect for cooperative choices and shared spaces.37 The modified Charter mentions seeking a balance between individual and collective responsibility, collective intelligence, cooperation, mutualization, promoting individual ownership while strengthening social ties, creativity, solidarity, cooperative values and equitable distribution of wealth. Goals include an economy of the commons (common good), affordable and sustainable neighbourhoods, promoting participatory cooperatives, artisanal knowledge in construction systems, promoting activities that respect all forms of life, preserving biodiversity, affordable housing and facilitating citizens’ initiatives. 38 The Ethical Charter of Quescus, a cooperative that will be built besides OuVerture in Presinge in 2027, concentrates on sustainable issues such as renewable energy, soft mobility, recycling and a society at 2000 watts, while mentioning values of solidarity, intergenerational solidarity, sharing common spaces and activities. 29 https://www.egw-ccl.ch/fr/anleihen/ or https://www.egw-ccl.ch/fr/emprunts; https://www.egw-ccl.ch/fr/portrait 30 CCL (January 2024) Borrowing volume and interest rates 1990 to January 2024. CCL, Olten. https://www.egw-ccl.ch/sites/default/files/pdf/egw_entwicklung_anleihevolumen_und_zinssaetze_2024-01-31-f_0.pdf 31 https://www.fonder-construire-habiter.ch/comment-financer-les-projets/ 32 https://www.egw-ccl.ch/sites/default/files/pdf/egw_charta_wohnbautrager_2013-01-01-d.pdf 33 www.wbg-schweiz.ch 34 https://www.wbg-schweiz.ch/information/wohnbaugenossenschaften_schweiz/mitglieder/genossenschaften and https:// www.wbg-schweiz.ch/information/wohnbaugenossenschaften_schweiz/mitglieder/assoziierte_mitglieder 35 Swiss Charter: http://gchg.ch/le-groupement/charte-et-statuts/ 36 GCHG contest at https://labelco.gchg.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/20201208_Reglement_label_co.pdf 37 Cooperative Équilibre, Geneva. Charte Éthiqe, adopted on 11 May 2005 and completed 12 May 2015. 38 Cooperative Équilibre, Geneva. Charte Éthique, 23 November 2020. Author translation. 35 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) 3.8 Engaging in cooperative housing: motivations Interviewees’ motivations highlight belonging, a sense of empowerment and a commitment to group experiential innovation. Interviewees share some common life moments: moments of change. They become cooperators as they are forming a family, relocating to another city or country, experiencing a change in family life, or retrieving childhood memories of growing up in a cooperative. The period between the formation of the housing cooperative and the members’ entry into their new dwelling lasts between seven and twelve years. Thus, motivation needs to be sustained over a long period before they enter their cooperative. Interviewees explain that members work in various sectors, including manufacturing, services, education, research and the arts. Some are self-employed professionals, such as hairdressers. In some cases, members have been union members. Individuals seeking to join a specific cooperative need to apply, propose themselves or receive a notice from mailing lists or through acquaintances. It is common for members to remain in the same cooperative for an extended period. Members volunteer to serve on committees and the cooperative board. Housing is felt as shared homeownership, as a living space that is more secure due to factors of affordability, accurate knowledge about the quality of the construction, the power to define and monitor rules of living and sharing, and the ability to influence living and transportation conditions from young to old age. Self-management, participation, sharing and defining common spaces are essential for all interviewees. Some interviewees talked about displacement, arguing that they live in a model based on cost to rent, which prevents displacement because the original people can stay, as rents remain lower than any market rates. This would be a question for further research. They express that they can accommodate people with limited financial resources through solidarity. They endeavour to gain access to land on more favourable terms through the utilisation of foundations, yet are aware that these fail to meet their needs. Members learn from other cooperatives about collective innovation, whether in solar panels at La Rencontre, dry toilets and materials at Luciole and OuVerture, or architecture at Kalkbreite. They travel to other regions for such visits. A major motivation is to take control of their common housing and lives: “We rent our houses to ourselves(…) You don’t have to put up with the whims of a landlord who suddenly wants your house back. You know in your statutes what to do if something happens” (Interviewee Geneva 11, p.4). Cooperative members build their bundle of rights by embodying their normative expectations into their rules. Following Polanyi, normative expectations become embedded into a human economy. Cooperative members speak of housing as shared living that reduces uncertainty, vulnerability and provides opportunities. In pursuing the goal of decommodification in housing, they are able to establish a sense of belonging and create a space in which they can build their own lives. 3.9 Building a commons: practices As Schmid (2005) and the 2021 Venice Biennale exhibition39 show, there has been a shift of housing cooperatives towards a more participative approach in self-management and sharing. Decisionmaking tends to be horizontal, whether on design, budgets, materials and sustainability, but also ethics, rights and practices. The decision-making process takes time but is viewed as a necessary component to build trust. Decisions tend to be made by consensus and are recorded in writing. When opinions cannot be bridged, there is a vote. Youth and children have their own committees and present requests and proposals to the General Assembly. Conflict is understood as unavoidable, and every cooperative decides the rules on how to deal with it. They tend to leave first private matters to be solved directly among members, followed by mediation. In Zurich, at Kalkbreite cooperative, the decision has been to have an ombudsman. “An internal ombudsman’s office is available for conflicts that cannot be resolved by the tenants themselves. This person is (re-) elected annually by the General Assembly. (Interviewee, Kalkbreite, Zurich, 666, p.1; 33 – 34). The criteria for the allocation of apartments are set out in the rental rules formulated through a 39 Cooperative Conditions Exhibition at the Biennale de Venise 2021, https://cooperativeconditions.net 36 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) participatory process and subsequently approved by the general assembly. In Kalkbreite, an independent rental committee is responsible for the selection process. Ultimately, the decision is made by the immediate neighbours (in each cluster). In the case of groups such as students, residents can select their own flat mates without the involvement of the rental committee (Interviewee, Zurich 605, pp. 95-326). At Kalkbreite, if there are too many members with the same characteristics, the cooperative uses an algorithm identical to that used by the city authorities, although the final say belongs to the cooperative clusters of smaller groups of cooperative members. This is to care for vulnerable groups such as pensioners, the elderly, refugees and women. Every cooperative decides the number of working groups and committees, and a common practice is to care for others, in particular children and the elderly, such as a committee on ageing, and parent shifts to cook for all children going to school. Cooperative members choose the nonprofit architect, visit other cooperatives and exchange regularly in larger meetings. They have designed rooms, mezzanines for children (in Geneva) and movable panels (in Zurich), to mention a few examples, to suit members’ needs. At Kalkbreite, for every nine people, there is a common living room, namely for those living in the surrounding cluster, with a full kitchen that is a communal space. In addition, members have a large kitchen with a cook supervised by the public regulatory authority, which they have to clean in teams by volunteering every three months. Each member has a compact kitchen unit in his or her apartment, consisting of a sink, a modest fridge and a wastepaper basket, but no oven, washing machine or dishwasher. The latter are located in the common room (Interviewee, Zurich, 639, pp.81-165). The management of some commercial premises in larger cooperatives, such as the Kalkbreite cinema, may be delegated to third parties. This requires further research, as Polanyian movements of commodification and decommodification may occur simultaneously, to analyse which pattern (reciprocity, redistribution or market exchange) prevails over the others. Solidarity networks may be observed through formal or informal arrangement. Kalkbreite hosts both an office to provide refugees with information and Greenpeace Switzerland, since 2014.40 I met an Afghan refugee from the same cluster where my guide is living. Cooperatives’ common rooms are open for use by nonprofit associations. In La Rencontre in Geneva, the common room for their general assembly is used by the fair-trade association Magasins du Monde. Observed common activities and spaces include those in Schmid (2005) but new ones appear. The following stand out (Annex 3 mentions the full list): - Shared rooms: a) common rooms: for the general assembly, rooms for external visitors, such as friends and family; b) guest rooms: some decide they can reserve a few times a year, some up to five days each time, for family or friends; c) craft and repair rooms for hire or for free reservation, including to work with metal, bikes, wood, and music room, which may be reserved on paper, internet or with a QR; d) working rooms, studios and co-working. - Green sharing: common compost, may include water management; gardens, vegetable and fruit ones, shared and/or parceled; spaces for the public to sit in green spaces, eat, study; d) spaces for celebrations, pizza ovens, bread baking. - Repairing and recycling: small repairs free of charge, exchange spaces for repairs, donations, services; billboards as a means to give away objects, or offer services. - Funding: deposit fund, reserve funds, solidarity funds; financial assistance in emergencies. - Environment: solar panels; compost; water management; dry toilets. - Mobility: soft mobility as an option or as requirement (e.g., rejection of parking cars except for disabled members); free bikes. The photos in Annex 2 show examples of how the members of the cooperatives visited have designed these types of spaces. Interviewees speak of their results in terms of sustainability and innovation such as La Rencontre’s self-built solar thermal systems, which has since been adopted throughout 40 According to Offconsult AG, Greenpeace moved in as it shares the cooperative vision of sustainability and forward-thinking ideas. https://retaildesignblog.net/2017/02/22/greenpeace-office-by-offconsult-ag-zurich-switzerland/ 37 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Switzerland, resulting in a 10% increase in installations nationwide. CODHA Rigaud members, after winning the competition call for urban projects by the local city council, have built six buildings with a total of 49 flats, including a cluster and 3 guest rooms, seamlessly integrated in the neighbourhood through green areas. It is the first self-sufficient project in Geneva with the Minergie P Eco® label, producing 90% of the electricity it consumes. In Kalkbreite, the incorporation of movable panels is an integral aspect of the architectural design, facilitating adaptability to the various needs of residents. This idea of adaptability is in opposition to the notion of mass housing. After being experimented in Kalkbreite, it was replicated in their follow-up project Hallenwohnen, completed in January 2021. The private and semi-private spaces are adaptable to changing needs, with the use of large open halls that feature collective basic structures and rollable residential towers (Khatibi, 2022). The process of nesting enables the formation of shared solutions. In Geneva, members of Luciole and Equilibre, two neighbouring cooperatives of differing sizes, have relinquished the use of private vehicles in favour of sharing car-sharing schemes. They have implemented various sustainable construction techniques, including the utilisation of prefabricated caissons filled with straw bales (manufactured in the canton of Geneva) for the insulation of the façade, earth plaster for the interior cladding, lime rendering for the exterior cladding, direct consumption photovoltaic panels, heat recovery for heating and hot water, and wastewater treatment. To put these efforts into context, a 2021 study by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office asserted that cooperative dwellings use more gas and oil sources as buildings are larger and equipped with oil or gas boilers; as well as more solar thermal and renewable sources, compared to others (FS0, 2021). Concluding remarks The personal motivations of members who were interviewed are influenced by a range of factors, including economic, social and ecological considerations. However, experiences observed suggest the same movement towards decommodification as the source of their social construction where reciprocity is the prevalent pattern (Polanyi, [1944] 2001), sustained by experiential practices striving to build a commons (Ostrom, 2009). The cooperatives which were presented here exhibited common characteristics, including self-management, voluntary participation, sharing of common spaces and similar patterns regarding their bundle of rights. Once cooperatives are formed and built, they cannot be sold on the market, nor can they become for-profit. Their representation of life experiences shows a will to work together to achieve affordability and adaptability of materials and spaces through practices of solidarity, mobility and sustainability.. The encouragement of innovation appears to be correlated to the degree of trust (Putnam & Nanetti, 1994, pp. 139, 142, 148), which is a central aspect of a social dynamics based on reciprocity (Putnam, 2000, p. 19). The process of establishing trust through cognitive experience, such as in the construction of housing and the maintenance of relationships, serves to reinforce the notion of personal self-efficacy (Bandura, 2010). Consequently, members experience a sense of empowerment through practices based on reciprocity and sharing (Somerville, 1998). This is reinforced by the common spaces that members construct (Lawton, 2014, p. 217). Members of cooperatives are able to access knowledge in a number of areas, including construction, ecological transition, training, such as cadastral reading, devising soft mobility solutions, as well as funding instruments, such as cooperative mortgages, cooperative bonds, solidarity funds and foundations. Since 2014, awards have enhanced their visibility but several instruments and practices date back to earlier decades, such as bond guarantees and mortgages. Housing cooperatives are between 20 and 55% cheaper than other options on the market. The foundation for this success can be attributed to social organisation, which is based on both ethical norms and self-management sustaining efforts of decommodification. It may be considered a coherent conceptual model built by experiential practices. The notions of the right to affordable housing and housing as a common good have gained more presence as a subject of public debate. In light of the fact that this is not a mass provision of housing and that the primacy of Swiss for-profit rentals is likely to persist, it can be argued that Swiss housing cooperatives may serve as exemplars showing that decommodification is possible, through a coherent set of bundle of rights, embedded ethics and self-management. A more comprehensive understanding of nesting practices (Helfrich, 2012) would help to better understand Polanyian movements. The potential for adoption abroad of some or all of their characteristics remains an open question and requires follow-up. Multidisciplinary dialogue among 38 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) researchers in urban sociology, environmental studies and cooperative studies is recommended to study cooperative housing, to encompass a range of issues, including community empowerment, ecological transition, forms of labour, solidarity practices and inclusive urban renewal advancing the concept of commons. Declaration on Conflicts of Interest The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Funding This research did not receive grants from any funding agency in the public, commercial or nonprofit sectors. Data Each interview has been shared with each interviewee. This data is available provided the interviewee gives written consent. Acknowledgements This paper and the research behind it would not have been possible without the generosity and expertise of interviewees, who also allowed me to visit their entire premises including their private apartments. They have improved this work in many ways; and any remaining error that may remain is entirely my own responsibility. I am also grateful for the comments from Lucia Abbadie who has dedicated her time and expertise to provide valuable feedback and constructive criticism. Bibliography Aalbers, M. B. (2017). The Variegated Financialization of Housing. Int J Urban Regional Res, 41(4), 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12522 Aalbers, M.B. (2016) The Financialization of Housing: A Political Economy Approach. Routledge, London. Aglietta, M. (2020, October). Croissance, Crises et Regulation du Capitalisme, Dialogue avec Michel Aglietta. Germinal, Le Retour des Nations(1), 196–221. https://revuegerminal.fr/2020/10/26/ germinal1leretourdesnations/ Aglietta, M., & Timbeau, X. (2017). Capitalisme et inégalités. 128(4), 21. https://doi.org/10.3917/ ecofi.128.0021 Alternatiba Léman. (n.d.). Alternatiba Léman. Retrieved February 12, 2023, from https://web.archive. org/web/20230212180059/https://alternatibaleman.org/ Austin, M. (2003). The changing relationships between nonprofit organisations and public social services agencies in the era of welfare reform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 97-114. Balmer, I., & Bernet, T. (2015). Housing as a Common Resource? Decommodification and SelfOrganisation in Housing, Examples from Germany and Switzerland. In M. Dellenbaugh, M. Kip, M. Bienick, A. K. Müller, & M. Schwegmann (Eds.), Urban Commons, Moving Beyond State and Market (pp. 178–195). Birkhäuser. https://boris.unibe.ch/70441/1/9783038214953-012.pdf 39 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Balmer, I., & Gerber, J.-D. (2018). Why are housing cooperatives successful? Insights from Swiss affordable housing policy. Housing Studies, 33(3), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2017.134 4958 Bandura, A. (2010). Self-Efficacy. https://albertbandura.com/albert-bandura-self-efficacy.html and https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836 Bollier, A. & Helfrich, S. (2015). Patterns of commoning. Commons Strategy Group and Off the Common Press. Bourdieu, P. ([1990] 2005) The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity. Capoccia, G. (2015). Critical Junctures and Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, Strategies for Social Inquiry. Part III-Tools for temporal analysis (pp. 147-179). Cambridge University Press. Cole, D. H. & McGinnis, M. D. (Eds.) (2015). Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy: Policentricity in Public Administration and political science. Vol. 1. Lexington Books. Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research, Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE. Curtat, R. (2013, November 27). Le vieux rêve du logement social, https://notrehistoire.ch/entries/ QqNWj0VzBkr Czischke, D. (2018). Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593 Czischke, D., Carriou, C., & Lang, R. (2020). Collaborative Housing in Europe: Conceptualizing the Field. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1703611 Davis, J. E. (2006). Shared Equity Homeownership: The Changing Landscape of Resale-Restricted, Owner-Occupied Housing. National Housing Institute. http://www.nhi.org/pdf/SharedEquityHome. pdf Desmond, M., & Gershenson, C. (2016). Housing and Employment Insecurity among the Working Poor. Soc Probl, 63(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv025 Dewilde, C., & De Decker, P. (2016). Changing Inequalities in Housing Outcomes across Western Europe. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(2), 121–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2015.1109545 Drilling, M., Mühlethaler, E., Iyadurai, G., & Dittmann, J. (2021). Homelessness Research and Policy in Switzerland, A First Country Report Embedded in the UN and European Framework. European Journal of Homelessness.,15(1), 187–214. Duyne Barenstein, J. E., Schindler, S., & Schlinzig, T. (2023). Switzerland: a country of middle-class tenants. In I. Lima Rodrigues, D. Shach-Pinsly, K. Tsiambaos, & V. P. Korobar (Eds.), European MiddleClass Mass Housing: Past and Present of the Modern Community: Working Group 1 MCMH Atlas (1st ed., pp. 580–587). ISCTE-IUL. Duyne Barenstein, J. D., & Koch, P. (2022). How accessible and affordable are Swiss housing cooperatives? Insights and reflections on housing policies in Switzerland. Working Paper 6. Part of a research project funded by the Swiss Network for International Studies (SNIS). Ferreri, M., & Vidal, L. (2022). Public-cooperative policy mechanisms for housing commons. International Journal of Housing Policy, 22(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2021.1877888 Florida, R. (2019, February 5). How Affordable Housing Can Improve the American Economy. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-05/how-affordable-housing-canboost-the-economy FOH - Federal Office for Housing (2022) Map with the location of the properties of the more than 1,200 members of Wohnbaugenossenschaften Schweiz (in English, Swiss housing cooperatives). https://genossenschaften.wbg-schweiz.ch/ 40 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) FOH - Federal Office for Housing (2006). Human Settlement in Switzerland Spatial Development and Housing. BBL-Bern. https://www.iut.nu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Human-Settlement-inSwitzerland.pdf Foster, S. R., & Iaone, C. (2019). Ostrom in the city: design principles and practices for the urban commons. In B. Hudson, J. Rosenbloom, & D. Cole (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons. Routledge. Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti (2nd ed.). SAGE. FSO - Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland (2023a). Rented dwellings by type. https:// www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/construction-housing/dwellings/rented-dwellings. assetdetail.24129140.html FSO - Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland (2023b) Type of owners of rented dwellings of the six biggest cities, 2020-2022 cumulated. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/asset/en/24129141, published 23 February 2023. FSO - Federal Statistical Office of Switzerland (2023c) Type of owners of rented dwellings, cooperatives by construction period. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/asset/en/24129140 Gisselbaek, M, Haefeli, P. and Hollmulle. P. (2006, September 6-8) Participative retrofit of the Ilôt 13 area in Geneva, PLEA2006, 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva. https://www.archiwatt.ch/MAS_2011/CAS_1_RELEVE_22_Renovation_Ilot13_paper_PLEA2006.pdf Griffith, E.J., Jepma, M. & Savini, F. (2024) Beyond collective property: a typology of collaborative housing in Europe, International Journal of Housing Policy, 24:1, 121-141, https://doi.org/10.1080/19491 247.2022.2123272 Gulliver, K., Handy, C., & Morris, J. (2013). More than Markets: Mutual & Cooperative Housing in the UK. Human City Institute, Birmingham. Gurtner, P. (2014 February 4-5) National models of social housing: Switzerland. UNECE- United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, The Future of Social Housing: Environmental and Social Challenges and the Way Forward, Workshop Report, Geneva, 32. http://www.unece.org/ index.php?id=33997. Full text at https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/hlm/prgm/hmm/social%20 housing/2014_geneva/1.09.gurtner.pdf Helfrich, S. (2012) Muster und Prinzipien : einige grundlegende Feststellungen zu Commons, Werk, Bauen + Wohnen, 99. http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-349079 Housing Cooperatives International (CHI), Wohnbaugenossenschaften Schweiz, & Regionalverband Zürich (WBG) (2022) Second international Symposium, Zurich. https://housingsymposium.coop/; www.housingsymposium.coop Hölzl, C. (2022). Translocal Mobilization of Housing Commons. The Example of the German Mietshäuser Syndikat. Front. Sustain. Cities, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.759332 Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. (2022). The state of the Nation’s Housing 2022. Harvard Graduate School of Design and Harvard Kennedy School. https://www.jchs.harvard. edu/state-nations-housing-2022 Kakegai, Y. (2021, November 13). The Development of Central and Cantonal Housing Policies in Switzerland since the 1990s. SSHA Session 179 Housing Policy in the Late 20th Century. http:// ssha2021.ssha.org/uploads/210406 Khatibi, M. (2022). A Socio-spatial Approach to the First Legal Hall Cohousing Setting in Switzerland: The Case Study of Hallenwohnen in Zurich. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09980-y Koch, P. (2021, May 20). The Role of Housing Cooperatives in Switzerland. Working Paper 3.1. Research project funded by the Swiss Network for International Studies (SNIS), https://digitalcollection.zhaw. ch/bitstream/11475/24785/3/2021_Koch_Role-housing-cooperatives-Switzerland_WPaper.pdf Lang, R., & Novy, A. (2014). Housing cooperatives and Social Cohesion: The Role of Linking Social 41 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Capital. European Planning Studies, 22(8), 1744–1764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.800025 Lawson, JM, Haffner, M., & Oxley, M. (2010). Comparative housing research in the new millennium: methodological and theoretical contributions from the first decade. In B. Randolph, T. Burke, K. Hulse, & V. Milligan (Eds.), Refereed papers presented at the 4th Australian Housing Researchers Conference (pp. 1–17). City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales. Lawson, J (2009). The Transformation of Social Housing Provision in Switzerland Mediated by Federalism, Direct Democracy and the Urban/rural Divide. European Journal of Housing Policy, 9(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710802693599 Lawton, J. (2014). Limited Equity Cooperatives: The Non-Economic Value of Homeownership. 43(1), 187–225. https://journals.library.wustl.edu/lawpolicy/issue/1379/info/ Mullins, D. (2018). Achieving policy recognition for community-based housing solutions: the case of self-help housing in England. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/19491247.2017.1384692 Mullins, D., & Moore, T. (2018). Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1422320 OECD. (2020). Social housing: A key part of past and future housing policy (Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Policy Briefs, Ed.). OECD, Paris. http://oe.cd/social-housing-2020 Ostrom, E. (2009, December 8). Prize Lecture. The Nobel Foundation, NobelPrize.Org. https://www. nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2009/ostrom/lecture/ Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press. Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(96)00023-x Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organisation of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. https://doi. org/10.2307/1952530 Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, M. B., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Indiana University and The University of North Carolina. https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x Pittini, A. (2018, June 6). 30 years through the fast lane Housing Europe turns 30. Housing Europe. https://www.housingeurope.eu/resource-1168/30-years-through-the-fast-lane Polanyi, K. ([1944] 2001). The Great Transformation. Beacon Press. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster. Putnam, R. D., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making Democracy Work, Civic traditions in modern Italy (1st ed.). Princeton University Press. Rérat, P. (2012). Housing, the Compact City and Sustainable Development: Some Insights From Recent Urban Trends in Switzerland. International Journal of Housing Policy, 12(2), 115–136. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2012.681570 Revue Syndicale Suisse, Union suisse des Fédérations syndicales (1910 a, January 31). Mouvement syndical suisse: Cheminots, 2(1), 6-7. https://www.e-periodica.ch/digbib/view?pid=rss-001%3A1910%3 A2%3A%3A44&referrer=search#44 Revue Syndicale Suisse, Union suisse des Fédérations syndicales. (1910 b, November 7) Le congrès international des coopérateurs, Déclaration de Principe, 2(10), 171-173. https://doi.org/10.5169/ seals-382833 Rorato, M. (2018). Living Traditions, Housing Cooperative, Federal Department of Internal Affairs, 42 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Federal Office for Culture, Suisse Confederation. https://www.lebendige-traditionen.ch/tradition/en/ home/traditions/housing-cooperatives.html Ruedin, R. (1994) Société Coopérative d’habitation et bail a loyer, 8e Séminaire sur le droit du bail, Neuchâtel. https://www.publications-droit.ch/files/subjects/Ruedin94.pdf Sazama, G. (1996). A Brief History of Affordable Housing Cooperatives in the United States. DigitalCommons@UConn. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/econ_wpapers/199609 Sazama, G. W. (2000). Lessons from the history of affordable housing cooperatives in the United States: A case study in American Affordable Housing Policy. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 59(4), 573–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/1536-7150.00045 Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics , 68(3), 249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375 Shoag, D. (2019). Removing Barriers to Accessing High-Productivity Places. Brookings Institution, Policy Proposal, The Hamilton Project. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ Shoag_PB_web_20190129.pdf Shroyer, A., & Gaitán, V. (2019, September 11). Four Reasons Why Employers Should Care About Housing. Urban Institute, Housing Matters. https://web.archive.org/web/20220914132103/https:// housingmatters.urban.org/articles/four-reasons-why-employers-should-care-about-housing Skelton, I. (2002). Supporting Identity and Social Needs: The Many Faces of Coop Housing. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives-Manitoba. https://policyalternatives.ca/newsroom/news-releases/cooperatives-could-help-solve-canadas-housing-crisis-report-shows Société Suisse des Ingénieurs et des Architectes (1919, November 1st) Congrès de l’Habitation. Bulletin Technique de la Suisse Romande, 49(22), 238-239. https://www.e-periodica.ch/digbib/view?pid=bts002%3A1919%3A45%3A%3A1577&referrer=search#1577 Somerville, P. (1998). Empowerment through Residence. Housing Studies, 13(2), 233–257. https://doi. org/10.1080/02673039883425 Sørvoll, J. (2013). The politics of cooperative housing in Norway and Sweden 1960-1990 (1945-2013). Ph. D Thesis, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo. Sørvoll, J., & Bengtsson, B. (2018). The Pyrrhic victory of civil society housing? Co-operative housing in Sweden and Norway. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1080 /14616718.2016.1162078 Stavrides, S. (2015, Spring). Common Space as Threshold Space: Urban Commoning in Struggles to Re-appropriate Public Space. Footprint 16 Delft Architecture Theory Journal, 9(1), 9–20. https://doi. org/10.59490/footprint.1.896 Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. Swiss Confederation. (2003) Housing law. « Loi fédérale encourageant le logement à loyer ou à prix modérés (Loi sur le logement, LOG) », RO 2003 3083, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/oc/2003/423/fr Swiss Federal Council. (2024) Action Plan, « Plan d’action sur la pénurie de logements, 13 February ». https://www.newsd.admin.ch/newsd/message/attachments/86058.pdf at https://www.admin.ch/ gov/fr/accueil/documentation/communiques.msg-id-100019.html Swiss Federal Council. (2021) 2030 Sustainable Development Strategy, Bern, 23 June, https://www. are.admin.ch/are/en/home/media/publications/sustainable-development/strategie-nachhaltigeentwicklung-2030.html Tummers, L. (2016). The Re-Emergence of Self-Managed Co-Housing in Europe: A Critical Review of Co-Housing Research. Urban Studies, 53(10): 2023-2040. Sage Publications. https://doi. org/10.1177/0042098015586696 UNECE (2014) The Future of Social Housing: Environmental and Social Challenges and the Way Forward. Workshop Report. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. http://www.unece. 43 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) org/index.php?id=33997 Vey, J. (2016). Crisis protests in Germany, Occupy Wall Street, and Mietshäuser Syndikat: Antinomies of current Marxist- and anarchist-inspired movements and their convergence. Capital & Class, 40(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816815627389 Vidal, L. (2024). Urban commons in practice: housing cooperativism and city-making. In M. A. Martínez (Ed.), Research Handbook on Urban Sociology (pp. 472–490). Edward Elgar Publishing. Wendt, M. (2018). Weil es nur zusammen geht. Campus Verlag. Wijburg, G. (2020). The de-financialization of housing: towards a research agenda. Housing Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1762847 Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications. SAGE Publications, Incorporated. 44 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Annex 1. Cooperatives’ Dates and Awards Annex 1.1. Key Dates La Rencontre in Geneva: members worked together since 1986, as part of the social struggles at îlot 13. The construction of the six-storey building with one basement level was done between 1992 and 1994. OuVerture in Presinge, Geneva. Members started the cooperative in 2015 and will enter the dwellings in 2027. This will be a small cooperative in a group of three. Some members come from earlier cooperatives. Codha Rigaud in Chêne-Bourg, Geneva, completed its construction in 2017 for a total of 78 adults and 66 children. Luciole was founded in 2008. The works for fourteen homes were completed in 2017. Members share common spaces, but they self-manage common rooms and services together with the larger ‘sister’ cooperative Equilibre. Kalkbreite in Zurich started as an association (Verein) in 2006, worked out its vision in 2007-2009 and has been a cooperative (Genossenschaft) since 2007. Works were completed in 2014. Annex 1.2. Awards Among the various awards received by housing cooperatives throughout Switzerland for their quality and innovation in social, energy and architectural terms, the following are relevant to this study: Equilibre received the Prix cantonal du développement durable du Canton de Genève 2018. Equilibre is the larger ‘sister’ of Luciole, part of the Rue Soubeyran building. Luciole, the smaller ‘sister’ of Equilibre, won the 2018 Cantonal Sustainable Development Award for its composting and wastewater treatment system.41 CODHA Rigaud has received two awards. Among 313 entries, it was one of the eight to receive the ‘Distinction Romande d’Architecture’ in 2018.42 In 2020, out of 517 entries, it was the only Swiss project to receive the European Architecture Award for its social and architectural qualities.43 La Ciguë, part of Ilôt 13 where the cooperative La Rencontre is located, and which works were completed in 2011, received the award Distinction Romande d’Architecture 2014; the Arc-Award 2014; Lièvre de bronze 2011, and the 2024 World Habitat Award44. With rents 55 % cheaper than market rates, it is the world’s biggest housing cooperative managed by students. Kalkbreite in Zurich received the award Hans Sauer Preis 2016; the Architekturpreis Kanton Zürich 2016, and the Special Arc-Award 2014. 41 Federal Office for Housing – BWO, community housing, award winning buildings, https://www.bwo.admin.ch/bwo/de/home/ wohnungspolitik/gemeinnuetziger-wohnungsbau/ausgezeichnete-bauten/soubeyran.html 42 This prize is considered the best architecture award in the canton. https://www.tdg.ch/deux-genevois-primes-aux-oscars-de-larchitecture-656838340787 43 European Architecture Awards 2019-2020 https://www.archi-europe.com/rigaud-55-by-bonhote-zapata-architects-2/ 44 The housing cooperative La Ciguë was awarded the Silver Medal by World Habitat in 2024. https://www.housinginternational. coop/news/2024-world-habitat-awards/. https://world-habitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Project-Summary-La-Cigue-students-housing-cooperative-in-Geneva-Switzerland.pdf and https://cigue.ch/the-cigue-presented/ 45 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Annex 2. Photos All photographs were taken by the author in 2023. © Claudia Sanchez-Bajo Figure 1a. Luciole Cooperative Common Roof Figure 2a. Ilot 13 Neighbourhood central garden 46 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Figure 3a. Kalkbreite Cooperative, Public central green space Figure 4a. La Rencontre Cooperative Common Repair Room 47 CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios C. Sanchez-Bajo | Au24 (2024) Annex 3. Full list of observed common spaces and activities • Shared rooms: a) common rooms: for the general assembly, rooms for external visitors such as friends and family; b) guest rooms: some decide they can reserve a few times a year, some up to five days each time, for family or friends; c) craft and repair rooms for hire or for free reservation, including to work with metal, bikes, wood, and music room, which may be reserved on paper, internet or with a QR; d) working rooms, studios and co-working. • Green sharing: a) common compost, may include water management; b) gardens, vegetable and fruit ones, shared and/or parceled; c) spaces for the public to sit in green spaces, eat, study; d) spaces for celebrations, pizza ovens, bread baking. • Repairing and recycling: a) small repairs free of charge, exchange spaces for repairs, donations, services; b) billboards as a means to give away objects, or offer services. • Funding: a) deposit fund, reserve funds, solidarity funds; b) financial assistance in emergencies. • Environment: a) solar panels; b) compost; c) water management; d) dry toilets. • Mobility: a) soft mobility as an option or as requirement (eg. rejection of parking cars except for disabled members); b) free bikes. • Information: a) free delivery of a cooperative association magazine; b) regularly published internal information bulletin; c) billboards to share information pertaining to social mobilisation for issues such as human rights, housing rights, women’s rights and ecology.; d) open source software. • Culture, celebrations and skills: a) bookshelves with books freely exchanged, sometimes only for reading, sometimes for keeping as well; b) skill training such as cadastral reading, specialized training such as building solar panels; c) music room; d) community events, parties or excursions for residents; e) cooking together, including full cluster kitchens, or common kitchens that can be reserved; f) theater, yoga, rooms for children or youth committees. • Solidarity with vulnerable persons: a) solidarity funds; b) lunches for senior citizens and children; c) visits to the sick, mutual support; d) neighbourhood support. • Housing tasks: a) washing and drying machines; b) cleaning tools and products; c) gardening tools. • Economic activities, one or more: beer brewery, cafe, restaurant, recycling shops. • Communication: they have developed internet systems with open software to report debates, documents, decisions and problems, coordinate meetings, track usage of rooms and other facilities, as well as budgets and projects. 48