Asdas REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
STA. MESA, MANILA
GEED 10013
Buhay at Mga Sinulat ni Rizal
A Reflection Paper : Does Rizal deserves to be
our national hero?
Submitted by:
Shiela Marie M. Licot
BSIT 4-4
Asdas REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
STA. MESA, MANILA
The question of whether or not Jose Rizal is deserving of the title of our national hero is one that has
impacted the halls of history, stirring the flames of patriotism and provoking discussions. Seeking to
traverse the nuances of Rizal's legacy is something that I find myself struggling with as a student seeking
to answer this inquiry. Whether he is a true hero and a source of motivation for the Filipino people, or
whether there is a darker side that portrays him as a traitor, the question remains. The purpose of this
reflection paper is to investigate both points of view, analyzing the grounds in favor of and against Rizal's
standing as our national hero, and taking into consideration the perspective that a student such as myself
may have toward this historical person.
Rizal's intellectual prowess and his commitment to social justice are two of the most persuasive arguments
in favor of his inclusion in the category of heroes. The literary classics that he has created, especially "Noli
Me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo," are potent instruments that reveal the terrible realities of Spanish
colonial control. My appreciation for Rizal's dedication to education and knowledge as powerful tools for
societal transformation stems from the fact that I am currently a student. His advocacy for peaceful reforms,
as opposed to outright rebellion, represents a pragmatic attitude that resonates with my view of the power
of ideas and conversation in constructing a better society. He encourages peaceful improvements rather
than revolutionary uprisings.
Rizal fought against the oppression of colonial rule and made a significant contribution to the development
of a national identity, highlighting his heroism. For me, as a student, his bravery in challenging the status
quo and giving a vision of a liberated Philippines centered on principles of justice and equality is a source
of inspiration.
On the other hand, critics contend that Rizal's original attitude of advocating for improvements within the
colonial system might be read as collaboration rather than outright rebellion. They say that this
interpretation is more accurate. As a result of his unwillingness to support armed insurrection, some people
believe that he has betrayed the most radical forces that are seeking quick independence. These concerns
are something that I struggle with as a student, and I find myself wondering whether Rizal's attitude was
excessively cautious or whether it was a planned strategy to set the framework for future opposition.
However, detractors argue that Rizal's original call for reforms within the colonial system could be
interpreted as collaboration rather than outright rebellion. This is the position that detractors take. Some
argue that his unwillingness to support violent revolt gives the impression that he betrays the more radical
Asdas REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
STA. MESA, MANILA
elements seeking quick independence. These concerns are something that I struggle with as a student, and
I find myself wondering whether Rizal's attitude was excessively cautious or whether it was a planned
strategy to set the framework for future opposition.
A further degree of complexity has been added to the discussion by the issue that surrounds Rizal's
involvement with the Katipunan, which is a revolutionary movement that is fighting for independence.
While there are those who contend that his membership with the organization was more symbolic than
active, there are others who believe that his participation in the organization shows him as a traitor to the
colonial administration. In my role as a student, I frequently find myself negotiating these historical
intricacies and striving to reconcile the many points of view.
A further degree of complexity has been added to the discussion by the issue that surrounds Rizal's
involvement with the Katipunan, which is a revolutionary movement that is fighting for independence.
While there are those who contend that his membership with the organization was more symbolic than
active, there are others who believe that his participation in the organization shows him as a traitor to the
colonial administration. In my role as a student, I frequently find myself negotiating these historical
intricacies and striving to reconcile the many points of view.
Jose Rizal's affiliation with the Katipunan, a revolutionary movement dedicated to fighting for Philippine
independence, adds complexity to the debate over his standing as a national hero. When it comes to the
debate over whether Rizal was a hero or a traitor, this particular aspect of his life adds a nuanced depth to
the discussion. It presents students like myself with deep historical complexities to navigate and diverse
perspectives to reconcile.
Some argue that Rizal's association with the Katipunan symbolically supported their cause rather than
actively participating in the movement. This suggests that his link with the revolutionary group was more
of a support of their cause than an actual involvement in the movement. This perspective makes an effort
to portray Rizal as a cautious strategist who strategically aligned himself with the goals of the movement
while maintaining a certain distance from it. As a student, you will need to give careful analysis to the
nuances that Rizal manifested in his acts as well as the possible political techniques that he may have
utilized in order to successfully grapple with this interpretation.
Asdas REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
STA. MESA, MANILA
They argue that Rizal's involvement in the Katipunan portrays him as a traitor to the colonial administration.
On the other hand, there are those who believe that Rizal was a member of the Katipunan. From this point
of view, active membership in a revolutionary group that is working for the destruction of the current
administration is considered to be a betrayal of loyalty to the colonial rulers. Taking this position into
consideration compels me, as a student, to investigate the ramifications of Rizal's involvement and to ponder
whether it is more in line with the principles of resistance or collaboration.
Navigating the complexities of historical time periods poses a difficult task for students. When it comes
to honoring Rizal's contributions to the nationalist cause, it is necessary to strike a fine balance between
doing so and admitting the potential contradictions or ambiguities that appear in his acts. As a student, I
frequently find myself caught between these two opposing points of view, striving to understand the reasons
that led Rizal to make the decisions that he did and the wider ramifications that his involvement with the
Katipunan had.
Furthermore, the debate arises as to whether or not Rizal's membership with the Katipunan marked a shift
in his stance, moving away from calling for reforms and toward adopting more radical tactics for gaining
independence. The inclusion of this subject complicates the ongoing discussion on the development of
Rizal's philosophy and his changing role in the fight against colonial power.
In order to successfully navigate these historical complexities, students like myself need to participate in
critical engagement with primary materials, historical narratives, and interpretive perspectives that differ
from one another. It becomes not only an investigation of the decisions that Rizal made in his personal life
but also an analysis of the larger political landscape and the methods that individuals utilized during a period
of revolutionary fever.
The varied nature of Jose Rizal's participation with the Katipunan serves as a poignant reminder to me, in
my capacity as a student, that historical leaders are frequently complicated individuals and that their acts
are open to a variety of interpretations. Having this awareness encourages a more nuanced view of the hero
or traitor argument, which in turn invites a more full understanding of Rizal's position in the fight for
Asdas REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
STA. MESA, MANILA
independence in the Philippines. This highlights the importance of adopting a discernment-based approach
that considers the complexities inherent in historical narratives.
Rizal's membership with the Katipunan adds additional layers of complexity to his legacy. There are many
who contend that his membership in the revolutionary movement was merely symbolic, implying that he
was willing to connect himself cautiously with their ideas. On the other hand, many argue that actively
associating with a group working to overthrow the current government could be seen as treacherous. When
you are a student, navigating among these many points of view becomes an essential component of the
learning process. This highlights the fact that history is both dynamic and interpretative. In order to better
understand this multifaceted perspective, students like myself need to investigate primary materials,
historical narratives, and a variety of perspectives. Additionally, it urges us to do an in-depth analysis of
the reasons that led to Rizal's judgments as well as the larger political landscape that existed during the
period of revolutionary fervor. Through our engagement with these difficulties, not only do we acquire
insights into Rizal's character, but we also develop a more sophisticated knowledge of the obstacles and
choices that individuals face in their quest for societal change. The investigation of Rizal's involvement
with the Katipunan stimulates a continual voyage of study and critical analysis. By doing so, it encourages
us to challenge our preconceived notions, take into account a variety of points of view, and welcome the
ambiguity that frequently characterizes historical stories. A more mature and discriminating attitude toward
the discussion over whether a historical figure is a hero or a traitor is fostered by this procedure. This
approach recognizes that historical individuals, like Rizal, defy simple categorizations.
Additionally, this multifaceted perspective leads to a more comprehensive understanding of the larger
sociopolitical milieu in which Rizal functioned. This prompts students to explore the limitations and
potential of the time period, the ever-changing nature of political ideology, and the complex dynamics of
revolutionary movements. By conducting this investigation, we can acquire a more profound understanding
of the complexity that was present in the struggle for independence and the individuals who played crucial
roles within it. As a student attempting to navigate the nuances of Rizal's relationship with the Katipunan,
I am reminded that historical narratives are fluid and open to a variety of interpretations. The acceptance of
this complexity helps to cultivate a more nuanced perspective on the hero or traitor issue, which in turn
contributes to a more comprehensive comprehension of Rizal's significance in the fight for independence
in the Philippines. This fosters a continuous journey of research, critical analysis, and an appreciation for
Asdas REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
STA. MESA, MANILA
the vast fabric of history. Whenever I think about whether or not Jose Rizal deserves the prestigious title of
our national hero, I am filled with wonder because of the intricacy that is embedded within his legacy.
When I approach this subject as a student, I am acutely aware of the significance of doing a thorough
analysis of historical figures, considering the complex interaction between the positive and negative
characteristics that they possessed. My appreciation for Rizal stems from his academic achievements, his
tireless campaign for change, and his final sacrifice in the face of imprisonment and execution. Rizal's
legacy is diverse, and it requires critical analysis if it is to be appreciated. To begin, Rizal's academic
accomplishments are a demonstration of his intellectual prowess and should be first and foremost
considered. I, myself, am a student, and I find that his constant dedication to education and knowledge
serves as a source of motivation for me. Rizal pursued brilliance at the University of Santo Tomas in Manila,
where he experienced success in both medicine and philosophy. This was accomplished despite the fact
that he was subjected to racial prejudice and discrimination. Resilience and determination are attributes that
resonate with me as a student who is navigating my own educational route, and his academic experience is
a perfect example of both of these qualities. Rizal's bravery in advocating for societal reform is also worthy
of mention. His literary masterpieces, "Noli Me Tangere" and "El Filibusterismo," serve as potent tools that
highlight the brutal realities of Spanish colonial control. He wrote both of these works. The ability of Rizal
to channel his emotions and observations into impactful tales that not only questioned the existing social
order but also created a sense of nationalism among Filipinos is something that I respect as a student. Rizal's
writings, born out of a yearning for fairness and equality, illustrate the transformative power of literature
as a platform for social change.
Furthermore, the ultimate sacrifice that Rizal made exemplifies his unshakable dedication to the ideas that
he actively advocated for. He made the decision to embrace martyrdom rather than surrender his ideas so
that he may avoid being imprisoned and facing the possibility of being executed. As a student, I find Rizal's
bravery to stand by his convictions, even in the face of grave personal consequences, to be a source of
tremendous inspiration. The fact that he is willing to give up his own life for the sake of a bigger cause is a
demonstration of a degree of devotion and integrity that strikes a chord with deep resonance. Despite the
fact that I recognize these excellent traits, I am also aware of the intricacies that are contained within Rizal
has left behind. With his early support for nonviolent changes and his later affiliation with the Katipunan,
the question over whether he was a hero, or a traitor is enriched with more layers of depth. As a student,
you will find that wrestling with these difficulties becomes an essential component of comprehending the
Asdas REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
STA. MESA, MANILA
larger historical context and the delicate decisions that individuals make during times of substantial political
upheaval.
To summarize, the topic of whether or not Jose Rizal is worthy of the title of our national hero is one that
calls for a thorough analysis of his accomplishments, the decisions he made, and the sociopolitical climate
of the time in which he lived. In my capacity as a student, my appreciation for Rizal originates from his
successful academic career, his dedication to bringing about societal transformations, and his final sacrifice.
The intricacies that are contained within his legacy, on the other hand, inspire continued contemplation and
critical analysis, highlighting the significance of treating historical individuals with a balanced viewpoint
that takes into account both their strengths and their limits. On the other hand, as I struggle to answer the
question of whether a person is a hero or a traitor, I am reminded that history is not a static narrative but
rather a dynamic discourse that is formed by different points of view. Whether Rizal is remembered as a
hero or a traitor is a topic of discussion that is ongoing and requires thorough analysis of the sociopolitical
environment in which he lived during his time.
In conclusion, the debate that surrounds the question of whether Jose Rizal is worthy of the title of our
national hero encourages students, including myself, to embark on a journey of introspection and thought.
There is no denying that Rizal, with all his numerous accomplishments, has a significant place in the history
of the Philippines. His academic achievements, literary masterpieces, and unflinching dedication to justice
are all evidence of his role as a thinker and an advocate for change. His advocacy for change is obvious in
his intellectual successes. However, the intricacies that are woven within Rizal's legacy, particularly
regarding his attitude toward armed resistance and his associations with revolutionary parties, give layers
of depth to the interpretation of historical events. As a student, I must navigate the uncertainties surrounding
his cautious attitude, which some may interpret as complicity with the colonial administration. I find myself
fluctuating between considering Rizal as a hero who laid the intellectual underpinning for independence
and as a figure whose heroic actions laid the foundation for freedom, due to the potential misinterpretation
of his cautious techniques. It is imperative that an ongoing examination be conducted on the topic of
whether Jose Rizal was a hero or a collaborator. Students should investigate the complexities of history,
consider the sociopolitical climate of his era, and conduct an in-depth analysis of the reasons that led to his
acts. The legacy of Rizal is not a static story but rather a dynamic discourse that calls for careful
investigation and an awareness of the complexity that is inherent in historical personalities. As a student, I
Asdas REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES
STA. MESA, MANILA
am reminded that competing points of view frequently shape history, and Rizal's life exemplifies this
complexity. There is no denying the fact that he made significant contributions to the nationalist cause;
nonetheless, the nuances of ambiguity that he chose to express remind us of those historical personalities,
just like every other individual, have multiple facets. As one engages in the hero or traitor debate, it prompts
a deeper understanding of the complex decisions individuals make during times of significant political
upheaval. At the end of the day, the investigation into whether Jose Rizal was a hero, or a traitor is a process
that is still ongoing. The purpose of this is to serve as a call for constant thought, critical analysis, and a
commitment to deciphering the complicated legacy that he has left behind. This journey results in students
like me engaging with history not as a fixed narrative but rather as a tapestry woven with diverse strands of
interpretation, leading to a deeper and more complex understanding of the history of our nation.