REPORTS
STATUS
to the
PAPERMAKING
PROJECT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
March 8 - 9,200O
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
INSTITUTE
OF PAPER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Atlanta, Georgia
ANNUAL
PROGRAM
REVIEW
PAPERMAKING
March 8-9, 2000
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
.February lo,2000
TO: MEMBERS OF THE PAPERMAKING
PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Attached for your review are the Status Reports for the projects to be discussed at the
Paper-making Project Advisory Committee meeting being held at the Institute of Paper
Science and Technology. The Program Review is scheduled for Wednesday, March 8,
2000, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and the PAC Committee Meeting will meet on
Thursday, March 9, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
We look forward to seeing you at this time.
Sincerely,
Frederick W. Ahrens, Ph.D.
Professor of Engineering & Unit Leader
Water Removal Research
FWA/map
Attachments
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Institute of Paper Science and Technology, Inc.
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, GA 303186794
Telephone 404-894-5700
FAX# 404294~IPST (4778)
PAPERMAKING
PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
.
IPST Liaison:
RAC Liaison:
Chairman:
Dr. David Orloff (404) 894-6649; FAX (404) 894-1496
Mr. John Bergin (715) 422-2239; FAX (715) 422-2227
Dr. Jay Shands (608) 364-8501; FAX (608) 364-8600
Dr. Dwight E. Anderson *(I200 1) Vice Chairman
Manufacturing Manager
Weyerhaeuser Company
WTC 2F39
Post Office Box 2999
Tacoma, WA 98477-2999
(253) 924-6466
(253) 9246541 FAX
[email protected]
Dr. Slava Babinsky *(200 1)
Fellow
Mead Central Research
Eighth & Hickory Streets
Post Office Box 1700
Chillicothe, OH 4560 I-5700
(740) 772-3056
(740) 772-3595 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. John Bergin *@AC Liaison)
Director of Research and Development
Consolidated Papers, Inc.
Post Office Box 8050
300 N. Biron Drive
Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495-8050
(7 15) 422-2239
(7 15) 422-2227 FAX
[email protected]
Dr. G. Ronald Brown *(2001)
Director of Research
Westvaco Corporation
11101 Johns Hopkins Road
Laurel, MD 20723-6006
(301) 497-1301
(301) 497-1275 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Jack Burke *( 1999)
Principle Project Manager
Radian International LLC
1979 Lakeside Parkway
Suite 800
Tucker, GA 30084
(770) 4 14-4522
(770) 414-4919 FAX
Dr. Partha S. Chaudhuri *( 1999)
Senior Scientist, Papermaking
Champion International Corporation
Technical Center
West Nyack Road
West Nyack, NY 10994
(914) 578-7123
(914) 578-7474 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Frank Cur-mane *( 1999)
Vice President, Technology
AstenJohnson
4399 Corporate Road
Post Oftice Box 11800 1
Charleston, SC 29423
(843) 747-7800
(843) 747-3856 FAX
fi-ank.cunnaneQasten.com
Mr. Richard Daniel1 *(Alternate)
R&D Laboratory Manager
EHV Weidmann
One Gordon Mills Way
St. Johnsbury, VT 058 19
(802) 75 l-3328
(802) 751-3373 FAX
[email protected]
Dr. Christopher P. Devlin *(2001)
Process Engineering Manager
Inland Eastex
A Temple-Inland Company
Post Office Box 816
Silsbee, TX 77656
(409) 276-3 190
(409) 276-3419 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. R. Doug Estridge *(Alternate)
Staff Engineer
BE&K Engineering Company
2000 International Park Drive
Post Office Box 12607
Birmingham, AL 35202-6607
(205) 972-64 16
(205) 9726300 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Thomas M. Hailer *(2001)
Paper Applications Supervisor
Specialty Minerals Inc.
9 Highland Avenue
Bethlehem, PA 180 17
(6 10) 882-8756
(610) 861-3412 FAX
Mr. Ed R. Hendrickson *(2001)
Research Engineer
Potlatch Corporation
Post Office Box 503
Cloquet, MN 55720-0503
(2 18) 879-0626
(2 18) 879-2375 FAX
[email protected]
* The dates in ( ) indicate
the final year of the appointment.
Revised
12/08/99:at
PapermakingPAC (cont.)
Mr. Kenneth Kaufman *(200 1)
Senior Research Manager
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
1400 Holcomb Bridge Road
Building 40012
Roswell, GA 30076
(770) 587-7493
(770) 587-7709 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Markku Korpela *(Alternate)
Kymni Paper R&D
UPM-Kymmene Fine Paper
FIN-45700
Kuusankoski, FINLAND
+358-204-15-3541
+358-204-l 5-2552
[email protected]
Dr. Alexander A. Koukoulas “(2002)
Manager, Papermaking Process Research
1ntemational Paper Company
Corporate Research Center
1422 Long Meadow Road
Tuxedo Park, NY 10987
(9 14) 577-7275
(9 14) 577-7507 FAX
[email protected]
Dr. Charles Kramer “(2001)
Director
Albany International Research Company
Post Office Box 9114
Mansfield, MA 02048-9114
(508) 337-9541
(508) 339-4996 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. David J. Lacz *(2OOl)
Technical Associate
Eastman Kodak Company
Paper Support Division B-3 19
1669 Lake Avenue
Rochester, NY 14652-3622
(716) 477-6301
(7 16) 588-2680 FAX
[email protected]
Dr. Jeffrey D. Lindsay *(Alternate)
Associate Research Fellow
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
2 100 Winchester Road
Post Office Box 999
Neenah, WI 54957-0999
(920) 72 l-3990
(920) 721-7748 FAX
Mr. Greg Maule “(2001)
Production Manager
Consol idated Papers, Inc.
1101 Main Street
Niagara, W 1 54 15 1
(7 15) 25 l-8326
(7 15) 25 l-1540 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Vie Nisita *(200 1)
Operations Superintendent
Wisconsin Tissue Mills
Chicago Operations
13101 S. Polaski Road
Alsip, IL 60658
(708) 824-4397
(708) 389-4901 FAX
[email protected]
Dr. Franc0 Palumbo *( 1997)
Riverwood International Corporation
Post Ofice Box 35800
West Monroe, LA 7 1294-5800
(3 18) 362-2000
(3 18) 362-2441 FAX
Dr. Paul R. Proxmire “(2001)
Research Associate
Appleton Papers Inc.
Post Office Box 359
Appleton, WI 549 12-0359
(920) 730-7254
(920) 991-7243 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Jeffrey R. Reese *(2001)
Consultant, Paper Mill
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
133 Peachtree Street, NE
18th Floor
Atlanta, GA 30303
(404) 652-4880
(404) 584-1466 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Thomas E. Rodencal *(Alternate)
Sr. Paper Mill Staff Engineer
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
133 Peachtree Street, NE
18th Floor
Atlanta, GA 30303
(404) 652-45 14
(404) 584-1466 FAX
[email protected]
* The dates in ( ) indicate the final year of the appointment.
Revised 12/08/99:at
Papermaking PAC (cont.)
Mr. Nickey J. Rudd *(2002)
Vice President, Special Projects
BE&K Engineering Company
Post Office Box 12607
Birmingham, AL 35202-2607
(205)969-3600
(205) 972-6300 FAX
Dr. Jay A. Shands “(2001) (Chairman)
Manager, Forming Systems
Beloit Corporation
Rockton Research Center
1165 Prairie Hill Road
Rockton, IL 6 1072- 1595
(608) 364-850 1
(608) 364-8600 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Ralf Sieberth *(200 1)
Sr. Vice President, Market & Business Development
Voith Sulzer Paper Technology North America inc.
Post OffIce Box 2337
2200 North Roemer Road
Appleton, WI 549 13-2337
(920) 73 l-0769
(920) 731-1391 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Frank J. Sutman *(2002)
Sr. Research Scientist
Hercules Incorporated
Pulp and Paper Division
75 10 Baymeadows Way
Jacksonville, FL 32256
(904) 733-7110
(904) 448-4995 FAX
frank.j.sutmanQbetzdearborn.com
Mr. David G. Thurman *(Alternate)
Project Leader, Board
Eka Chemicals Inc.
1775 West Oak Commons Court
Marietta, GA 30062-2254
(770) 321-4138
(770) 321-5880 FAX
Mr. Markku Tuderman *(2002)
Vice President, Research and Development
UPM-Kymmene
Eteltiesplanadi 2
P.O. Box 380
FIN-00 10 1 Helsinki, FINLAND
Mr. James R. Watson *(2001)
Segment Manager - Printing & Writing Grades
Eka Chemicals Inc.
1775 West Oak Commons Court
Marietta, GA 30062
(770) 321-4142
(770) 32 l-645 1 FAX
358-204
15 111
358-2041
50 507 FAX
[email protected]
Mr. Lloyd 0. Westling *( 1999)
Vice President, Production Planning
Longview Fibre Company
Post OffIce Box 639
Longview, WA 98632
(360) 575-5259
(360) 575-5926 FAX
[email protected]
Dr. Gary L. Worry *(200 1)
Research Fellow
Fort James Corporation
19 15 Marathon Avenue
Post Office Box 899
Neenah, WI 54957-0899
(920) 729-8470
(920) 729-8023 FAX
[email protected]
* The dates in ( ) indicate the final year of the appointment.
Revised
12/08/99:at
PROJECT
PAPERMAKING
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MEETING
March 8-9, 2000
Institute
of Paper Science and Technology
Atlanta, Georgia
Location:
.March
Se m in a r R o o m
8,.2&)0 - COMNflTTEE’,DlSCU~SlONS
AGENDA
.: ,’
7:30 a.m.
Coffee/Danish
8:00 a.m. - 8:lO a.m.
Opening Remarks,
Review of Antitrust Statement and
Confidentiality Statement
Chairman
8:lO a.m. - 8:40 a.m.
Portfolio Management System and Project
Scoring
Gary Baum,
David Orloff
8:40 a.m. - 8:45 a.m.
Welcome
Fred Ahrens,
Cyrus Aidun
8:45 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.
Project F048
Approach Flow Systems
Ted Heindel
9:30 a.m. - IO:15 a.m.
Project F022
Flow Through Porous Media
Seppo Karrila
IO:15 a.m. -IO:30 a.m.
Break
IO:30 a.m. - 1I:00 a.m.
Project FO03
Fluid Dynamics of Suspensions
Cyrus Aidun
1I:00 a.m. - 12:00 a.m.
Project FO05
Headbox and Fluid Hydrodynamics
Cyrus Aidun
12:00 p.m. - 12:45 p.m.
Lunch and IPST Update
Gary Baum
12:45 p.m. - I:30 p.m.
Project F039
Water Removal Limits
Tim Patterson
I:30 p.m. - 2:15 p.m.
Project FO40
Press Dwell Time Limits
Paul Phelan
2:15 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
Project F04 1
High Intensity Water Removal
Fred Ahrens
3:00 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.
Break
3:15 p.m. -4:15 p.m.
Project F021 & 4253
4:15 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Subcommittee Discussions of Projects &
Preparation of Summaries
Drying Productivity
Fred Ahrens
Tim Patterson
NOTE: IO minutes of project discussioti time is included at the end of each presentation.
+ Dinner provided
at 6:00 p.m.
PAPERMAKING
PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
March 8-9, 2000
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
Atlanta, Georgia
Location: R o o m 1 7 3
nhh
9; 2000 .-C~MMI?TEE’D~SCUSS~ONS AGENDA
”
7:30 a.m.
Coffee/Danish
8:00 - 8:10 a.m.
Convene
- Antitrust Statement
- Confidentiality Statement
- New Members
- Acceptance of Fall, 1999 minutes
- Review of Agenda
Chairman
8:lO - 8:30 a.m.
F022 Flow Through Porous Media
(Karrila)
Chaudhuri, Shands, Sieberth
F048 Approach Flow Systems
(Heindel)
Hendrickson, Westling, Bergin,
Rudd
850 - 930 a.m.
F021 Drying (Ahrens/Patterson)
Reese, Worry, Beck
9:10 - 9:30 a.m.
FO05 Headbox and Forming (Aidun)
Anderson, Devlin, Koukoulas
9:30 - 950 a.m.
F041 High Intensity Water Removal
(Ahrens)
Babinsky, Watson, Kaufman
950 - 10: 10 a.m.
FO03 Fluid Dynamics of
Suspensions (Aidun)
Brown, Maule, Proxmire
8:30 - 850
lO:lO-IO:30
a.m.
a.m.
Break
IO:30 - IO:50 a.m.
F039 Water Removal (Patterson)
Cunnane, Lacz, Haller
IO:50 - II:10 a.m.
FO40 Press Dwell (Phelan)
Kramer, Palumbo
ll:lO-II:30
a.m.
Proposed Projects
IPST PI’s
11:30-12:15
p.m.
PAC Discussion of Potential
Projects
All
Final Discussion/Adjourn
All
12:15-
12:30 p.m.
NOTE: Subcommittee chairs are indicated in underlined bold characters above,
+ Lunch provided.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1
Project F048
Approach Flow Systems .....................................................................
Project F022
Flow Thru Porous Media ...................................................................
43
Project FO03
Fluid Dynamics of Suspensions ........................................................
61
Project FO05
Fundamentals of Head box and Forming Hydrodynamics ............... .73
Project F039
Water Removal Limits .......................................................................
85
Project FO40
Press Dwell Time Limits ..................................................................
127
Project F041
High Intensity Water Removal ........................................................
139
Project F02 1
Drying Productivity . .... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... .... .. ... .... ... .. ... .... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. 159
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
APPROACH FLOW SYSTEMS
STATUS REPORT
FOR
PROJECT F048
Ted Heindel (PI)
Aklilu Giorges
March 8 - 9,200O
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30318
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
3
F048
DUES-FUNDED
Project
Project
PAC:
Title:
Number:
Project
Staff
Principal
Research
PROJECT
SUMMARY
Approach
Flow Systems
F048
Papermaking
Investigator:
Support
Staff:
Ted Heindel
Aklilu Giorges
FY 99-00 Budget:
$75,007
Time Allocation:
Principal
Research
Investigator:
Support
Staff:
I
LINE/ROADMAP:
RESEARCH
Status Report
January 2000
20%
50%
LINE #II
Improve the ratio of product performance
to cost for pulp and paper products by
25% by developing
break-through
papermaking
and coating processes which can
produce the innovative webs with greater uniformity than that achieved with current
processes.
2
PROJECT
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this project is to provide recommendations
to improve the spatial
and temporal consistency
and chemical uniformity of the stock leaving the approach
flow area.
3
PROJECT
BACKGROUND:
The PI in this project began the project on July 1, 1999. The initial focus was to
review the work completed in a related project conducted
by Dr. Xiaodong Wang
(Project FO04). Appendix A of this status report contains brief summaries
of the various
reports completed
by Dr. Wang. Familiarization
of other literature related to approach
flow systems and pipe mixing was also completed.
From this background,
it was
decided to focus this research on improving the spatial and temporal consistency
and
chemical uniformity in the approach flow area. The ultimate goal of this project is to be
able to provide paper producers and suppliers with recommendations
on approach flow
piping configurations.
To accomplish
the goal of providing approach flow recommendations
to IPST
Member Companies,
this project will focus on developing and validating a model of the
fiber mixing process. Once a model is validated, it can be used throughout
the pulp and
paper process where one constituent
is mixed with another. The model will also provide
a tool to paper producers to allow them to design approach flow configurations
to
optimize mixing performance
given economic and space limitations. This effort will follow
two parallel research paths, schematically
represented
in Fig. 1. The first path stresses
the development
of a new fiber mixing model, and the second addresses experiments
to
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
-..
Project
4
F048
study the mixing process and
mixing model for a concentric
system were completed.
This
stages of a water/fiber
model
Section 10.
4
Status Report
January 2000
to validate the model. Since July 1999, a water/water
pipe mixer was developed and experiments
in a similar
work will be detailed in Section 10. Additionally,
the initial
and the accompanying
experiments
will be outlined in
MILESTONES:
This project was initiated by this PI on July I, 1999. In the Fall PAC meeting it was
agreed that by June 2000, high speed video analysis of the concentric mixing process
with velocity ratios of up to R, = 5 will be completed for a water/water
system and a
water/l%
fiber system. It was further agreed that by June 2000, a model of turbulent
fiber mixing in a concentric mixer will be developed.
As of January 2000, water/water
mixing experiments
and numerical predictions
have been completed for velocity ratios
from I to 6, and a model of the fiber mixing process has been outlined. Details of this
work are provided in Section 10.
5
DELIVERABLES:
The overall deliverable
concentric mixing process.
6
STATUS
OF GOALS
of this project
is a validated
model of the water/fiber
FOR FY 99-00:
The status of the goals for the current fiscal year, as of January
summarized
as follows:
2000, are
1. Review previous FO04 work.
Status: Completed
2. Become familiar with the approach flow and mixing literature.
Status: Completed
3. Modify the current experimental
facility.
Status: Completed
4. Review CFD software options and purchase a new CFD software
Status: Completed
5. Water/water
concentric mixing:
a. Experiments
Status: Completed
b. Computations
Status: Completed
c. Comparisons
between predictions and experiments
Status: In progress
6. Water/l%
hardwood fiber concentric mixing:
a. Model development
Status: In progress
b. Experiments
Status: Not yet begun
c. Computations
Status: Not yet begun
d. Comparison
between predictions and experiments
Status: Not yet begun
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
license.
Project
7.
7
F048
Status Report
January 2000
Member Company Report
Status: Not yet begun
SCHEDULE:
The project schedule for the current fiscal year is summarized
in Table
numbers correspond
to the goal numbers listed in Section 6 (above).
Table 1:
Project
Task
Descriptions
1
8
SUMMARY
F048 schedule
1999
July - Sept
0-I X
1. The task
for FY99-00.
1999
Ott - Dee
2000
Jan - Mar
2000
Apr - Jun
OF RESULTS:
This project began with the current PI on July 1, 1999. Since that time, the current
concentric mixing experimental
facility has been modified to achieve velocity ratios of up
to 6 without cavitation occurring at the trailing edge of the inner pipe. Using this facility,
water/water
mixing experiments
have been completed.
By increasing the velocity ratio
from 1 to 6, the mixing distance was reduced by approximately
65%. Additionally,
qualitative observations
revealed that by increasing the velocity ratio, the inner jet
spreading angle was found to be larger (i.e., the jet spread faster) and the downstream
mixing region was more uniform.
New CFD software was also acquired for this project and turbulent water/water
concentric mixing was modeled with the standard k-E and realizable k-E turbulence
models. Numerical studies have shown that the closure constants in the turbulence
models can influence the predicted mixing effects. Constant values of CE = 1.7 and CZE
= 2.4 for the standard k-E model and C2 = 2.2 for the realizable k-c model have been
used to obtain reasonable
qualitative agreement
with the experimental
data. It was
further shown that qualitative differences
between the two k-E models were very small.
We are in the process of extending the mixing experiments
to a water/fiber
system,
as well as developing
a new model of water/fiber
mixing. In the model, we propose to
model the fiber mixing process by using a variable local shear stress (i.e., viscosity)
which is a function of local fiber consistency
and shear rate.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
9
BULLETED
l
l
l
l
6
F048
Status Report
January 2000
KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Water/water
mixing experiments
have been completed
velocity ratios between 1 and 6.
in a concentric
mixer for
Turbulence
model closure constants affect the predicted mixing results
using the experimental
results, the closure constants were determined.
Reasonable
predictions
Thus,
qualitative agreement
between experiments
and numerical
have been obtained with water/water
concentric mixing.
A new method
to model water/fiber
mixing
has been proposed.
10 DISCUSSION:
Details from work completed since July 1, 1999 are summarized
below.
addresses the experimental
work. Section 10.2 and 10.3 focus on modeling
mixing and water/fiber
mixing, respectively,
in a concentric pipe mixer.
10.1
Concentric
Mixing
Section 10.1
water/water
Experiments
Concentric mixing is a simple and effective method to mix one constituent
with
another. It is a common process in many industries, including the pulp and paper
industry. A schematic of a concentric mixin’g process is shown in Fig. 2. This process
involves mixing a fluid from an inner pipe with diameter d, volumetric flow rate q, and
mean fluid velocity u, with a fluid in an outer pipe of diameter D, volumetric flow rate Q,
and mean fluid velocity v. Typically, u > v and the inner pipe fluid is referred to as the
“primary fluid”, while the outer pipe fluid is called the “secondary fluid”. In many cases,
the primary fluid has a specified species concentration
C, while the secondary fluid has
a species concentration
C,. In this case, the purpose of the mixing operation is to
provide a uniform species concentration
downstream
of the primary fluid inlet. As shown
in Fig. 2, the jet issuing from the center pipe may be divided into two regions, the
potential core region and the entrainment
or mixing region. The characteristics
of the
potential core are identical to those of the primary fluid stream (e.g., u, C,), while the
characteristics
of the mixing region vary from those of the primary fluid to those of the
secondary fluid.
This mixing process appears to be simple, but very complex flow phenomena
occur
to thoroughly
mix the two fluid streams. When the two fluid streams enter the mixing
region at different velocities, a high shearing region forms at the interface between the
two fluid streams. Instabilities at this interface cause vortices to intertwine from each
stream, enabling mixing. Depending
on the mixing behavior, the two fluids may, or may
not, mix completely or uniformly.
The degree of mixing in a concentric mixer depends on the following [I]: the ratio of
inner-to-outer
pipe diameter; the ratio of inner-to-outer
pipe flow rates or velocities; the
ratio of specific gravities between the two fluid streams; the inner and outer pipe
Reynolds numbers; the pipe surface roughness;
and any secondary pipe flows. When
one of the constituents
is a fiber suspension,
additional parameters
related to the fiber
characteristics
(e.g., fiber length, coarseness,
flexibility, etc.) also affect the mixing
process [2-51.
One of the important parameters
in the mixing process
=
the primary and secondary fluid, R, u/v. In this research,
is the velocity ratio between
initial experiments
were
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
7
F048
Status Report
January 2000
conducted in a water/water
system in which 1 < R, < 6 to determine the effect of R, on
mixing. In addition, these data will then be used in the model validation phase of this
project.
10.1.1
Experimental
Equipment
A schematic of the former mixing system used by Dr. Wang is shown in Fig. 3. This
system was composed
of two transparent
concentric pipes in the test section, a large
mixing tank to hold the primary fluid,~a smaller water tank to hold the secondary fluid, a
large discharge tank, a pump, and the associated piping, valves, and flow meters. This
system was designed to provide a constant head input into the test section and
eliminate any pressure pulsations that may result from the system pump. With this
setup, however, a maximum velocity ratio of R, = 1.4 was realized before cavitation
occurred at the trailing edge of the inner pipe. This mean velocity ratio is much smaller
that those in industry, as well as those recommended
by others [5, 61.
To increase the possible velocity ratios, the flow loop was modified for this research
program to allow the primary fluid to enter the test section directly from the pump (Fig.
4). This increased the maximum possible velocity ratio, but also introduced
potential
pressure pulsations from the pump, which were assumed to be acceptable
if they were
present. With this current configuration,
a maximum water/water
velocity ratio of R, = 6
was achieved.
The test section, pictorially represented
in Fig. 5, consisted of a transparent
inner
pipe with inside diameter d = 2.54 cm (1 in) and a pipe wall thickness of 0.3175 cm
(0.125 in). The outer pipe was also transparent
and had an inside pipe diameter of D =
6.35 cm (2.5 in). As shown in Fig. 5, the inner pipe protruded into the outer pipe
approximately
4’ = 39.4 cm (15.5 in) after the 90° bend. The outer pipe extended
approximately
L = 58 cm (22.8 in) beyond the inner pipe trailing edge before exiting into
the discharge tank. Although L = 58 cm, the actual mixing region captured by high
speed video was approximately
35 cm (13.8 in) downstream
of the inner pipe trailing
edge, corresponding
to a mixing region of approximately
5.5D.
The high speed video equipment
used to capture the mixing process
Kodak Ektapro Motion Analyzer with a frame rate of 1000 frames/set.
10.1.2
Water/Water
Mixing
consisted
of a
Experiments
Initial concentric mixing experiments
were completed in a water/water
system. To
identify the primary fluid, red dye (rhodamine)
was added to city water in the large
mixing tank. This colored water was pumped through the inner pipe, while the outer pipe
was supplied with clear city water from the elevated secondary fluid tank. High speed
video images at 1000 frames/set
were then taken at the test section where the two fluid
streams were allowed to interact. These images encompassed
a mixing region of
approximately
5.5D.
During the experiments,
the mean secondary fluid velocity was held constant at
approximately
v = 1.30 m/s, while the mean primary fluid velocity was varied between
1.35 m/s 5 u 5 7.76 m/s. This corresponded
to a mean velocity ratio range of 1 2 R, < 6.
Table 2 summarizes
the actual flow conditions for each experiment.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
Table 2:
I
8
F048
Flow conditions
used in the water/water
Status Report
January 2000
concentric
mixing experiments.
Primary
Volumetric Flow
Rate, 9 @Pm)
Secondary
Volumetric Flow
Rate, Q @pm)
Mean Primary
Velocity, u (m/s)
Mean Secondary
Velocity, v (m/s)
Mean Velocity
Ratio, R, = u/v
10.8
50.8
1.35
1.30
1.04
20.7
50.0
2.58
1.28
2.02
30.6
50.2
3.81
1.29
2.95
40.4
51.3
62.3
I
50.6
50.3
50.2
I
5.03
6.39
7.76
I
1.30
1.29
3.87
4.95
1.29
6.02
7
I
Figure 6 illustrates the flow structure of concentric water jets mixing when R, = 1.04.
The outer pipe boundary is clearly identifiable,
and the tip of the inner pipe is captured
on the left-hand side of the image. Each dark “+” mark on the outside of the outer pipe
represents a distance of 1 D. The darker fluid is the colored primary fluid. The mixing
process can be visually observed from the dispersion of the dye that was introduced
in
the center jet. As expected, the mixing region increases in the radial direction as the
fluids evolve downstream.
The actual mixing process can be attributed to flow and
geometric factors that promote the interaction between the two fluid streams. A close
visual inspection directly downstream
of the trailing edge of the inner pipe in Fig. 6
points to a radial increase in the jet, even though the inner and outer jet mean velocities
are nearly identical. This agrees with the flow character reported by Dahm et al. [7]. In
their case, they concluded that the boundary layer on both sides of the inner pipe
introduced a wake. This resulted in a velocity defect and caused the two fluid streams to
intertwine at their interface, creating a vortex ring. In the current experimental
geometry,
boundary layers are present on both sides of the inner pipe, creating a velocity defect.
Additionally,
the inner pipe has a finite thickness, which results in wake formation at the
pipe trailing edge. This wake also contributes to the interaction between the two fluid
streams. Finally, through inspection of multiple images of the R, = 1.04 mixing process,
the location at which the colored fluid stream contacts the outer pipe wall (L, in Fig. 2)
can be estimated. This will be further discussed below.
A representative
image from the R, = 2.02 experiment
is shown in Fig. 7. The
location at which the colored fluid contacts the outer pipe wall has moved upstream
compared to that at R, = 1.04. For the relatively small velocity ratios depicted in Figs. 6
and 7, a large weave-like
coherent structure is observed along the interface between the
two fluids. This structure becomes unstable as it moves downstream,
indicating that
hydrodynamic
instabilities,
as well as small scale turbulent interactions,
enhance the
concentric pipe mixing process.
Figures 8 through 11 display representative
images of the mixing process for R,=
2.95, 3.87, 4.95, and 6.02, respectively.
As the mean velocity ratio increases, the inner
jet angle increases. This increase in R, also results in the decrease in the distance
between the inner pipe exit and the location at which the colored fluid contacts the outer
wall. The increase in jet spread also enhances the entrainment
of the outer fluid and its
mixing with the inner fluid. The inner jet and downstream
mixing region also appear
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
I
Project
9
F048
Status Report
January 2000
darker and more uniform as the mean velocity ratio increases. This is the result of two
factors: (i) the increase in center jet flow rate increases the dye concentration
of the
mixture causing the image to appear darker; and (ii) the large velocity difference
between the inner and outer fluid enhance small scale turbulent mixing creating a more
uniform mixture.
We define the dark region downstream
of the inner pipe as the mixing region, and
the distance between the inner pipe exit and the location at which the darker region
contacts the outer pipe walls (L, in Fig. 2) as the mixing distance. This distance has
been estimated from Figs. 6-l 1, and has been nondimensionalized
with respect to the
outer pipe diameter, D. This nondimensional
distance, Lw/D, has been plotted as a
function of mean velocity ratio in Fig. 12. Increasing the velocity ratio from 1 to 6
reduces L,/D by approximately
65%. This decline can also be used to obtain qualitative
comparisons
between experimental
observations
and numerical predictions and will be
completed in Section 10.25
Further analysis of multiple images from each test condition may also allow for
qualitative identification
of the local dye concentration
through variations in the image
intensity. This is currently under development
and may be used for model comparisons
if encouraging
results are obtained.
10.1.3
Water/Fiber
Mixing
Plans
The next phase of experiments
will be completed in the same flow loop and test
section, but with 1% fiber suspension
as the primary fluid. These experiments
are
currently planned for mid-March (after the Spring PAC meeting). It is hoped that a
laboratory repulper and dewatering
screw press that will assist with experimental
preparation
and cleanup will be approved and in place at this time. This equipment
has
been requested through IPST capital funds and is currently under review by IPST
management.
If this equipment
is not in place by mid-March, the 1% fiber mixing
experiments
will still be completed,
they will just be more time-intensive.
10.2
Numerically
Modeling
Water/Water
Mixing
Water/water
mixing was numerically
modeled in an attempt to simulate the fluid flow
in the water/water
mixing experiments.
Hence, the mixing process was simulated as two
turbulent miscible fluids with the same density and viscosity, but with different
concentrations
of an inert tracer (e.g., a red dye). For this model, the governing
equations and two turbulence
models are summarized
below. Selected numerical
results and comparisons
to experiments
are also provided.
10.2.1
Governing
Equations
The governing equations for conservation
of mass, momentum,
and tracer
concentration
for steady, incompressible,
turbulent viscous fluid flow with constant
properties are
dU
-= i
dx i
fluid
0
i =-- dP P d
PU .’ ax*I
aXi + dxj
dU
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
(2)
Project
10
F048
Status Report
January 2000
(3)
All quantities have been time averaged in the above equations,
and ui
mean local velocity components
in the axial and radial direction. Also,
density, p is the time averaged pressure, p is the dynamic viscosity, h
(turbulent) viscosity, c is the time averaged local tracer concentration,
number, and oc is the turbulent Schmidt number (specified as ~~ = 0.7
calculations).
(i = 1, 2) are the
p is the fluid
is the eddy
SC is the Schmidt
in our
The governing equations are discretized and solved using Computational
Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) software. The particular software used in this study is called FLUENT,
which uses a finite volume method to discretize the governing equations [8]. It was
selected because it can be used to model the conservation
equations of multiple fluid
streams [9], which will be discussed in Section 10.3.
The eddy viscosity (h) is specified through various turbulent models. Several models
have been developed,
but it is beyond the scope to this report to explain the advantages
and disadvantages
of each model. However, we present two turbulence
models that are
available in FLUENT v5 and were used to simulate the turbulent mixing process in this
study.
10.2.2
The Standard
k-E Model
The standard k-E model [IO] is widely used due to its robustness,
economy, and reasonable
accuracy for a wide range of engineering
of the model is that the eddy viscosity is defined by
Pt =Pc,-
computa
problems.
tiona
The basis
k*
&
(4)
where CCL is an empirical constant and k and E are the turbulent kinetic energy and
dissipation rates, respectively.
These parameters
are determined
from the following
transport equations
dk
UE
u
=PU .’ ax-1 ax*1
d
d&
Pt
P+ -+ Cl, ;Gk
% 1 dxj ii
where C,, and C,, are empirical constants,
numbers for k and E, respectively.
The Gk term represents
0
the production
E2
and ok and oE are the turbulent
of turbulent
kinetic energy
PI
where
S is the modulus
(6)
-C,,pyy
of the mean rate-of-strain
tensor defined
by
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Prandtl
and is modeled
by
Project
11
F048
Status Report
January 2000
(8)
S=p&
with the mean strain rate given by
1
S ij =2l
dU
i+J
ax 1
dU .
(9)
ax i
1
In the standard k-E model, the following constant values are used as defaults
FLUENT v5: Cp = 0.09, C,, = 1.44, C,, = 1.92, uk = 1 .O, and G& = 1.3. Comments
applicability of these values will be given below.
10.2.3
The Realizable
in
on the
k-E Model
One variant of the standard k-E model is called the realizable k-8 model [I I]. This
model differs from the standard k-E model in two ways [9]: (i) the realizable k-E model
contains a new formulation
of the eddy viscosity, k; and (ii) a new transport equation for
the dissipation rate, E, is used. One class of problems where the realizable k-E model
has been shown to be more accurate is the modeling of turbulent planar and round jets
PI.
For the realizable k-E model, the eddy viscosity given by Eq. (4) no longer has a
constant value for CP. Rather, CCL is now a complex function of the mean strain rate (Eq.
(9)). This formulation
can be found in FLUENT [9]. The turbulent kinetic energy equation
for the realizable k-E model is identical to that used in the standard k-E model (i.e., Eq.
(5)). The dissipation equation is given by
P”j~=~[(Pi~)~]+PCISE-Pc*
where S is given by Eq. (8), v is the kinematic
constant and
,:j,
viscosity
SklE
C, = max 0.43,
(Sk/&)+
[
The default
o&= 12. .
10.2.4
values
Numerical
for the realizable
(= p/p), C2 is an empirical
5
k-E model in FLUENT
1
(11)
v5 are C2 = 1.9 , (T)(= 1 .O, and
Results
Numerical simulations
of the water/water
concentric mixing phenomena
have been
completed using both the standard and realizable k-E turbulence
models available in
FLUENT v5 [9]. The flow conditions were assumed to be axisymmetric
to reduce the
computational
domain from three dimensions to two dimensions.
The actual
computation
domain (Fig. 13) encompassed
a radial distance of 3.175 cm and an axial
distance of 44.45 cm, corresponding
to a D/2 by 7D region. Note that the computations
encompassed
a 1 D length upstream of the trailing edge of the inner pipe and a 6D
length downstream.
This region was discretized into a numerical computational
grid of
36 x 300 nodes, with a slightly higher node density near the inner pipe trailing edge.
It is well known that turbulence
enhances the mixing process. Thus, the turbulence
model used to simulate mixing plays a major role in determining
realistic predictions.
It
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
12
F048
has also been shown that the values of the standard k-E model constants,
affect the relative concentration
of the mixing streams [12, 131.
Status Report
January 2000
CE and C,,,
To identify the appropriate
values for CE and CPE, selected numerical experiments
were completed at the velocity ratio extremes of this study (R, = 1 .O or 6.0). Figure 14
shows the concentric mixer concentration
profiles predicted with the standard k-E model
when R, = 1 .O. Recall from Fig. 13 that each image shows the upper half of the
concentric mixer, with the primary fluid entering from the lower left region and the
secondary fluid entering from the upper left region. The isopleths in each figure
represent lines of constant concentration.
Therefore,
at the trailing edge of the inner
pipe wall, the closely packed lines of constant concentration
represent a region of high
concentration
gradient. Downstream
of the inner pipe, the concentration
gradients are
much less severe. The results with C,, = 1.44 and CZE = 1.92 (the FLUENT v5 default
values) are shown in Fig. 14a. As CZE increases (Figs. 14b, c), the length of the potential
core of the inner jet (the region from the inner pipe to the first isopleth) decreases and
the jet spread increases. Figures 14d-f represent calculations
that were completed to
identify the best values for C,, and CZEl and were completed in conjunction
with the
calculations
at R, = 6.0.
Figure 15 shows similar numerical experiments
using the standard k-E model and R,
= 6.0. An analogous trend is observed when CZE is varied. By decreasing
C,,, the length
of the potential core of the inner jet increases and the jet spread decreases.
After
that C,, = 1.7 and
several numerical experiments
at R, = 1 .O and 6.0, it was determined
C 2E = 2.4 provide reasonable
qualitative agreement
to the experimentally
observed jet
shape. These constant values were used for all standard k-E model calculations
at the
intermediate
mean velocity ratios.
The realizable k-E model was also tested to determine the effect of C2 variations on
the mixing process. Figure 16b shows the predicted tracer concentration
for R, = 1 .O
when C2 is set to the FLUENT v5 default value of 1.9. Very little mixing between the
inner and outer fluid streams is observed, even after six pipe diameters.
By increasing
C2, the mixing is enhanced
as shown by the increased jet spreading and the shortened
potential core of the inner jet (Figs. 16~f), while decreasing C, results in less mixing and
a larger potential core (Fig. 16a). Figure 17 shows similar results for R, = 6.0. By
comparing the experimental
jet shape to the predictions
in Figs. 16 and 17, a value of C,
= 2.2 was selected to yield the best qualitative agreement
between the experiments
and
predictions.
This value was used for all realizable k-E model calculations
of this study.
10.25
Flow Visualization
Comparisons
Calculations
were completed using the standard k-E model and the realizable k-E
model to predict the experimental
jet shape at various R, values. For the standard k-E
For the realizable k-E
model, C,, = 1.7 and C,, - 2.4 were used for all calculations.
model, C, = 2.2. Figures 18-23 illustrate the numerical predictions with a representative
high speed video image from the various R, values for this study (Table 2). Each figure
shows that there are only small qualitative variations between the two turbulence
models. Further analysis is required to identify quantitative
differences
between the two
numerical models, if any. In general, both models predict the qualitative shape of the
mixing region between the colored and clear water streams. Figure 24 shows that the
dimensionless
mixing distance (L,/D) predicted by both turbulence
models are similar,
and they follow the experimental
trend. However, exact lengths at which the inner fluid
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
13
F048
Status Report
January 2000
stream contacts the outer pipe wall is a subjective measurement,
and Fig. 24 shows
only that the correct trend is predicted by each turbulence model.
The information
determined
in the water/water
mixing experiments
and
computational
simulations will be useful when extending the mixing system to water and
fiber. However, the modeling of this mixing process will be much more complicated.
Initial ideas in this area are presented next.
10.3
Modeling
Water/Fiber
Mixing
The mixing of a relatively thick fiber stream with a dilute fiber stream or white water
is a very common process in the pulp and paper industry. This occurs in the approach
flow area where thick stock is mixed with thin stock to dilute the fiber suspension
to the
proper headbox consistency.
This also occurs when chemical additives are introduced
into a pulp suspension
moving through the mill. Modeling this mixing process is very
complicated
because the fiber suspension
can behave as a Newtonian or a nonNewtonian fluid, depending
on the fiber type, fiber consistency,
flow conditions, and
local shear rate. This section of the status report will summarize our progress in
modeling this complex suspension
flow. First, suspension flows without fibers will be
briefly discussed. Then, fiber suspension flows will be addressed.
Finally, a proposed
new method to model the concentric pipe mixing process of two streams, one with fiber
and one without, will be outlined.
10.3.1
Suspension
Flows Without
Fibers
Suspensions
of solid particles in fluids are commonly encountered
in many
engineering
applications.
For sufficiently dilute suspensions
in a Newtonian
fluid, the
suspension
behaves as a Newtonian fluid. As the solids loading increases, the viscous
behavior of the suspension
becomes non-Newtonian
[14]. The point where this deviation
occurs cannot be reliably predicted because it depends on the characteristics
(i.e., size,
shape, roughness,
etc.) and concentration
of the solid material, as well as the solid-solid
and solid-fluid interactions
[I 4, 151.
The rheological
behavior of suspensions
(and for that matter, all liquids) can be
described by the deformation
or shear rate (y ) as a result of a shear stress (z>. Several
models that describe this viscous behavior for various fluids and suspensions
are
available [14-l 81. The simplest case is for a Newtonian fluid where the shear stress is
proportional
to the shear rate. The proportionality
constant is commonly called the
dynamic viscosity, p. This relationship
is described by
z = pj
(12)
For suspensions
of dilute spherical particles, the interactions
between particles can
be neglected and the fluid will behave as a Newtonian fluid. Citing Frisch and Simka
[19], Stein [18] describes the viscosity of such a system by the Einstein equation
I-L= i-9 0 + 2-w)
where $ is the volume fraction of the dispersed solids and h is the viscosity of the
suspending
medium. Additional models have been proposed to describe the viscous
behavior of suspensions.
Three of which are described below, which are summarized
from Darby [14].
A power law fluid can be described
by
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
(13)
Project
F048
Status Report
January 2000
where n is the flow index and m is the consistency
coefficient. A Newtonian fluid is
described by n = 1, a shear-thinning
fluid when n < I, and a shear-thickening
fluid when
n > 1. Most fluids exhibit a power law region over a specified shear rate range, but the
model fails at very high and/or low shear rates.
When a suspension
is at rest, interparticle
contact resistance may develop. Fluid
motion will develop only after an apparent yield stress (TV) is reached, It is common to
describe these fluid types as Bingham fluids with
where
pGo is a limiting
viscosity.
Combining the power
model, described by
law model with a yield stress produces
the Herschel-Bulkley
z= zy +mj”
This model is more flexible than the Bingham fluid model because
adjustable parameters
(xY, m, and n), but it still provides unrealistic
shear rates.
10.3.2
Suspension
(16)
it has three
behavior at high
Flows With Fibers
The flow of cellulose fiber suspensions
is different from other solid-liquid
suspensions
and conventional
Newtonian or non-Newtonian
fluids. The fibers inherently
entangle and form structures,
even at low fiber concentrations.
According to Stenuf and
Unbehend [3], the fibers rotate freely in a dilute suspension
of fibers and transfer
momentum
from regions of high velocity to regions of low velocity. This momentum
transfer produces additional drag forces which are proportional
to the shear rate. The
resulting system viscosity increases with increasing fiber concentration
and length until a
critical concentration
is reached. Above this concentration,
floes form and may rotate
freely. Further increases in fiber concentration
produce a more continuous
network
which must yield or break down when flow begins. This produces a yield stress followed
by a pseudo-plastic
flow behavior. Because of this behavior, fiber suspensions
have
been described as Bingham fluids [17].
Previous investigators
have studied the pipe flow behavior of fiber suspensions
and
it has been summarized
in many articles [2, 3, 20-291. From this information,
a
theoretical model of the effective viscosity can be identified [22]. The theoretical shear
stress behavior as a function of shear rate is shown in Fig. 25. Location A in Fig. 25
represents the yield stress that must be overcome to produce fluid movement.
Between
A and B, the flow rheology may be described as a Bingham fluid. From B to C to D, the
fluid becomes shear-thinning
and a drag reduction region is identified, with the
maximum drag reduction occurring at C. At location D, the shear rate is high enough
that the flow is highly turbulent and the fiber suspension
may be approximated
as a
Newtonian fluid. The theoretical
behavior is shown in Fig. 25, but the actual locations of
A, B, C, and D are dependent
upon many factors including the fiber type, fiber
consistency,
and pulping process.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
15
F048
Status Report
January 2000
A successful model of the fiber suspension
rheology must contain a majority of the
characteristics
found in Fig. 25. Wikstrom and Rasmuson
[30] have numerically
modeled a jet nozzle agitator in a large fiber suspension tank. A Bingham fluid model
and a Hershel-Bulkley
model of the fiber rheology was used in the numerical
calculations.
They concluded that there were no significant differences
between the two
rheology models because the dominating
parameter was the yield stress. Furthermore,
comparisons
to experiments
showed that the difference between the predicted and
experimental
velocities increased as the distance from the jet increased. Therefore,
they
concluded that a Bingham fluid model does not completely describe the fiber suspension
rheology, and this was attributed to the shear-thinning
behavior of the fiber suspension.
We believe that at least four significant behaviors must be incorporated
into any
model to accurately describe the fiber suspension
rheology. These behaviors include:
(I)
A nearly rigid region where the shear stress is below the yield stress.
(II)
A low shearing rate region where the fiber suspension
rheology
once the yield stress of the fiber suspension
is overcome.
(Ill)
A region where the shear stress is independent
of shear rate (i.e., line BD in
Fig. 25). This will provide a conservative
estimate of the fluid viscosity in the
shear-thinning
region.
(IV)
A high shear rate region where the suspension
Newtonian fluid (i.e., turbulent water flow).
behaves
is nearly linear
as a turbulent
Region I and II can be successfully
illustrated by modeling the suspension
as a
Bingham fluid. For this case, the yield stress is required for the fiber suspension.
This
value has been correlated for various fiber suspensions
and has the form [28]:
"Y
= aCP
(17)
where C is the fiber mass concentration
and a and p are empirical
depend on the fiber type. Hence, in modeling the fiber suspension
the local shear stress (zij) can be modeled as
where peff is the effective
suspension
constants that
mixing in this region,
viscosity.
In region III, the shear stress is described by the maximum shear stress obtained in
region II. This relationship
will be valid between locations B and D in Fig. 25,
corresponding
to critical shear rates jcrl and jcr2. At the second critical shear rate
value, jcr2, the shear stress once again becomes a linear function of shear rate. In this
region (region IV), the flow may be approximated
as highly turbulent Newtonian flow,
In summary,
the shear stress for a fiber suspension
Region
I and II:
3j
= a@
Region
Ill:
%j
= CCC
+ peffj
P
+ Peffh
flow may be modeled
r < hrl
= zmax
as
Wa)
Ycrl
< ? < L2
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
(2W
Project
16
F048
Region
IV:
zij ++I-&
<r
Ycr2
The challenging
for &I and Ycr2
and consistency.
Status Report
January 2000
aspect of this simplified
9 which are likely to depend
WC)
theory is identifying the appropriate
values
upon various parameters
such as fiber type
Additional characteristics
of fiber suspensions,
such as floe formation,
are not
included in the above discussion,
but may be added at a later date. For example, the
crowding factor, defined as [4]
N
=-
S&L2
03
(21)
where C, is the fiber mass fraction in percent, L is the fiber length in m, and CQis the
fiber coarseness
in kg/m. Kerekes and Schell [4] have shown that the crowding factor is
a measure of the level of fiber-fiber interaction,
and hence, the tendency to flocculate.
The effect of N on the local shear stress is currently unknown. However, Steen [31] has
concluded that the crowding factor and pipe Reynolds number were key variables that
determine if the pipe flow conditions are either plug, turbulent, or mixed. This will
ultimately affect momentum
transport in the fiber suspension
and possibly the mixing of
a fiber suspension
with a dilute fluid.
10.3.3
Modeling
Concentric
Pipe Mixing
of Fiber Streams
In this study, we will consider the concentric pipe mixing process with the inner fluid
consisting of a fiber suspension
and the outer fluid corresponding
to water (see Fig. 2).
As previously discussed, the two fluids will respond differently to fluid shear. Water
behaves a Newtonian fluid (Eq. (12)), while the fiber suspension
is non-Newtonian
(possibly described by Eq. (20)). As the two streams mix, the local viscous behavior of
the suspension will change because it is a function of the local fiber consistency
and the
local shear rate, both of which vary throughout
the mixing region. It is the goal of this
research to identify the appropriate
relationship
that describes this variation.
Consider the simplest concentric mixing flow conditions, laminar flow in an
axisymmetric
(two-dimensional)
mixer. The conservation
of mass and momentum
steady, incompressible
fluid with constant properties is
dU
-= i
ax i
dU
(22)
0
i
ax ij
dp
=-PU .’ ax-1
&i
+
ac
(23)
dxj
where zij is given either by Eq. (12) for water or Eq. (20) for the fiber suspension.
conservation
of fiber concentration
can also be written for this process; however,
assume that fiber transport is governed by advection only and fiber diffusion is
negligible. Therefore,
PU .-=
‘ax
for a
0
i
where c is the fiber mass fraction.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
The
we
(24)
Project
17
F048
Status Report
January 2000
The solution to these equations is complicated
becausethe fiber concentration
equation (Eq. (24)) is coupled to the momentum
equation through Zij, where Zij is a
function of fiber consistency
(Eq. (20)). The success of this model rests on the proper
definition of zij as described in Section 10.3.2.
It is hoped
process.
10.4
Goals
that this simple
model
can be extended
to the turbulent
concentric
mixing
for FY 00-01
Goals for the next fiscal year are based on a budget request of $115,000 for this
project. The goals include experimental
concentric mixing studies with the primary fluid
composed of 1 and 2% fiber suspensions.
Two different fiber types will be studied in
these experiments.
These experiments
will assist with model validation.
Modeling of the
concentric mixing process will also be continued. The model will be used to complete
parametric studies of various factors that affect the mixing process. These studies will
allow us to make recommendations
for concentric mixing modifications
and optimization.
The tasks for FYOO-01 are given below. The numbers
continue
from those is Section
6.
8.
9.
10.
1 I.
12.
13.
14.
10.5
Water/l%
softwood fiber concentric mixing
a. Experiments
b. Computations
c. Comparisons
Water/2% hardwood fiber concentric mixing
a. Experiments
b. Computations
c. Comparisons
Water/2% softwood fiber concentric mixing
a. Experiments
b. Computations
c. Comparisons
March 2001 Status Report
Member Company Report on the experimental
work
Numerical parametric studies
Member Company Report on the parametric studies
Deliverables
for FY 00-01
Two Member Company Reports will be completed during the next fiscal year. The
first will address the experimental
work and comparisons
to the model predictions.
The
second will focus on numerical parametric studies of the mixing process.
10.6
Schedule
for FY 00-01
The proposed schedule for Project F048 for FYOO-01 is provided in Table 3. The last
three months of FY99-00 are also included. The numbers in the task column correspond
to those in Section 6 and 10.4. The marks during any given time quarter represent some
work will be performed during that time period, but they do not imply a full-time
commitment.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
18
F048
Table 3:
Project
Task
Descriptions
16a
F048 schedule
for FYOO-01.
2000
Apr - June
l 6b
I
Status Report
January 2000
2000
Julv - Sept
I
2000
Ott - Dee
2001
Jan - Mar
--
2001
Apr-Jun
I
I
1 IOa
1 IOb
1IOC
II
REFERENCES
[II
Forney, L.J., “Jet Injection for Optimum Pipeline Mixing,” Encyclopedia
of Fluid
Mechanics
Volume 2 - Dynamics of Single-Fluid
Flows and Mixing, N.P.
Cheremisinoff,
Ed., Gulf Publishing Company,
Houston, 660-690 (1986).
PI
Duffy, G.G., and Lee, P.F.W., “Drag Reduction
Suspensions,”
APPITA Journal, 31(4): 280-286
PI
Stenuf, T.J., and Unbehend,
J.E., “Hydrodynamics
of Fiber Suspensions,”
Encyclopedia
of Fluid Mechanics:
Vol. 5 - Slurry Flow Technology,
N. P.
Cheremisinoff,
Ed., Gulf Publishing Company,
Houston, 291-308 (1986).
PI
Kerekes, R.J., and Schell, C.J., “Characterization
of Fibre Flocculation
Regimes
a Crowding Factor,” Journal of Pulp and Paper Science, 18( 1): J32-J38 (1992).
PI
Helmer,
Mixing,”
PI
Norman,
Control,”
VI
Dahm, W.N., Frieler, C.E., and Tryggvason,
G., “Vortex Structure and Dynamics in
the Near Field of a Coaxial Jet,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 241: 371-402 (1992).
PI
Patankar, S.V., /Vumerica/
Corp., New York, 1980.
PI
Fluent Incorporated,
in the Turbulent
(1978).
R.J.N., Covey, G.H., and Lai, L.C.-Y., “Laboratory
APPITA Journal, 52(3): 197-201 (1999).
B., and Tegengren,
Paper Technology,
A., “Stock Preparation
42-43 (January 1990).
Heaf Transfer
“FLUENT
Flow of Wood
Study of Co-axial
by
Stock
- A Key to Grammage
and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere
5 Users Guide,”
Pulp
Lebanon,
NH, Fluent,
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Publishing
Inc. 1998.
Proiect
J
WI
F048
19
Status Report
January 2000
Jones, W.P., and Launder, B.E., “The Prediction of Laminarization
with a TwoEquation Model of Turbulence,”
international
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,
15: 310-314 (1972).
[111Shih,
T.-H., Liou, W.W., Shabbir, A., and Zhu, J., “A New k-E Eddy Viscosity Model
for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development
and Validation,”
Computers
in Fluids, 24(3): 227-238 (I 995).
cw
Monclova, L.A., and Forney, L.J., “Numerical
Simulation of a Pipeline Tee Mixer,”
Industrial and Engineering
Chemistry Research, 34(4): 1488-I 493 (1995).
WI
Giorges, A.T., Forney, L.J., and Wang, X., “Numerical
Study of Multi-Jet
Industrial and Engineering
Chemistry Research, In review.
PI
Darby, R., “Hydrodynamics
of Slurries and Suspensions,”
Encyclopedia
of Fluid
Mechanics.= Vol. 5 - Slurry Flow Technology,
N.P. Cheremisinoff,
Ed., Gulf
Publishing Company,
Houston, 49-91 (1986).
WI
Ganani, E., and Powell, R.L., “Suspensions
of Rodlike Particles: Literature Review
and Data Correlations,”
Journal of Composite Materials, 19: 194-215 (1985).
Mixing,”
[I 61 Hanks,
R.W., “Principles of Slurry Pipeline Hydraulics,”
Encyclopedia
of Fluid
Mechanics:
Vol. 5 - Slurry Flow Technology,
N.P. Cheremisinoff,
Ed., Gulf
Publishing Company,
Houston, 213-276 (1986).
Cl71Hubbard,
D.W., “Diffusion and Mixing in Non-Newtonian
Fluids,” Encyclopedia
Fluid Mechanics:
Vol. 6 - Complex Flow Phenomena
and Modeling, N. P.
Cheremisinoff,
Ed., Gulf Publishing Company,
Houston, 35-l 09 (1986).
WI
Stein, H.N., “Rheological
Behavior of Suspensions,”
Encyclopedia
Mechanics:
Vol. 5 - Slurry Flow Technology,
N.P. Cheremisinoff,
Publishing Company, Houston, 3-48 (1986).
Cl91Frisch,
H.L., and Simka, R., “Viscosity of Colloidal Suspensions
Macromolecular
Solutions,” Rheology,
Theory and Applications,
Academic Press Inc., New York, 535-613 (1936).
of
of Fluid
Ed., Gulf
and
F.R. Eirick, Ed.,
WI
Lee, P.F.W., and Duffy, G.G., “An Analysis of the Drag Reducing
Suspension
Flow,” TAPPI Journal, 59(8): 119-I 22 (I 976).
Regime
WI
Sharma, R.S., Seshadri, V., and Malhotra,
Suspensions:
Some Mechanistic
Aspects,”
703-713 (1979).
in Dilute Fibre
Science, 34:
P21 Gullichsen,
Fundamental
R.C., “Drag Reduction
Chemical Engineering
J., and Harkonen,
E., “Medium Consistency
Technology
Data,” TAPPI Journal, 64(6): 69-72 (1981).
E231Duffy,
G.G., “The Optimum Design of Pipelines
Suspensions,”
APPITA Journal, 42(5): 358-361
Pu
for Transporting
(1989).
- I.
Wood
Duffy, G.G., “Flow of Medium Consistency
Wool Pulp Fibre Suspensions,”
APPITA Annual Genera/ Conference
Proceedings,
507-514 (1993).
P51 Powell,
R.L., Weldon, M., Ramaswamy,
of Pulp Suspensions,”
1996 Engineering
533 (September
16-l 9, 1996).
of Pulp
Pulp Fibre
47th
S., and McCarthy, M.J., “Characterization
Conference,
Chicago, TAPPI Press, 525.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
20
F048
WI
Kerekes,
Chicago,
m
Bennington,
Suspensions
69: 251-258
R.J., “Characterizing
TAPPI Press, 21-28
Fibre Suspensions,”
(September
16-19,
Status Report
January 2000
7996 Engineering
1996).
Conference,
C.P.J., Kerekes, R.J., and Grace, J.R., “Motion of Pulp Fibre
in Rotary Devices,” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering,
(1991).
P81 Bennington,
C.P.J., Azevedo, G., John, D.A., Birt, S.M., and Wolgast, B.H., “The
Yield Stress of Medium- and High-Consistency
Mechanical Pulp Fibre Suspensions
at High Gas Contents,” Journal of Pulp and Paper Science, 21(4): Jll l-J1 18
(1995).
WI
Pande, H., Rao, N.J., Kapoor,
Nonwood Fiber Suspensions,”
WI
Wikstrbm, T., and Rasmuson,
A., “The Agitation of Pulp Suspensions
with a Jet
Nozzle Agitator,” Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, 13(2): 88-94 (1998).
WI
Steen, M., “On Turbulence
Structure in Vertical Pipe Flow of Fiber Suspensions,”
Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal, 4: 244-252 (1989).
S.K., and Roy, D.N., “Hydrodynamic
Behavior
TAPPI Journal, 82(6): 140-I 45 (1999).
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
of
21
Project F048
Status Report
January 2000
12 FIGURES
Modeling
I
i
/
Approach
Flow Systems
Experiments
.
Validate mixing model
for concentric mixer
Concentric
mixer wl fiber
Parametric studies of
concentric mixers
Transverse
mixer wlo fiber
Modeling other
geometries
Transverse
mixer WI fiber
b\\
Figure 1:
Research
Approach
Flow
Recommendations
road map for Project
F048.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
22
F048
Status Report
January 2000
interface between the
inner and outer fluid
secondary flow
(Q, v, c S ) 1
primary flow
(4, u, q - I
LW
Figure 2:
Schematic
representation
of the concentric
mixing process.
constant
head stuff
box
city water
water overflow
sewer
thick stock
overflow
return
to
flow rate
control
valves
t
J
0
flow
meters
discharge
tank
Figure 3:
Former
experimental
mixing facility.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
23
F048
Status Report
January 2000
constant
head stuff
box
city water
water overflow
sewer
to
I
thick
stock
flow rate
1 control
va Ives
flow
meters
test section
Figure 4:
Modified
experimental
discharge
tank
mixing facility.
secondary
fluid (water)
Q
V
1
prima ry fluid
(thick stock)
mixing
Figure 5:
Concentric
pipe mixer test section.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
region
Project
24
F048
Status Report
January 2000
Figure 6:
The mixing process
at a mean velocity
ratio of R, = 1.04.
Figure 7:
The mixing
at a mean velocity
ratio of R, = 2.02.
process
I[PST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s lntcrnal Use Only)
Project
25
F048
Status Report
January 2000
Figure 8:
The mixing
process
at a mean velocity
ratio of R, = 2.95.
Figure 9:
The mixing process
at a mean velocity
ratio of R, = 3.87.
lPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
26
Project
F048
Figure
10: The mixing process
at a mean velocity
ratio of R, = 4.95.
Figure 11: The mixing process
at a mean velocity
ratio of R, = 6.02.
Status Report
January 2000
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
27
F048
Status Report
January 2000
n
- 3 3
I
0
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 12: The effect of R, on L,/D.
outer
Figure 13: The axisymmetric
computation
domain.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
6
7
Project
28
F048
Downstream
Status Report
January 2000
distance
D
2D
3D
4D
5D
(a) Cl, = 1.44 and C,, =I.92
cc) GE = 1.44 and C,, =2.5
w c,,
= 1.3 and C,, =2.5
(0 c 1E = 1.7 and C,, =2.3
Figure 14: Concentric mixing predictions
various C,, and C,, values.
for R, = I .O by the standard
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
k-E model for
Project
29
F048
Downstream
distance
D
(a>c,, = 1.44
(WGE=
Cd)Cl,
Status Report
January 2000
2D
3D
4D
5D
and C,, = I .92
1.44 and C,, = 2.3
= 1.5 and C,, = 2.3
(e> GE = 1.5 and CzE = 2.5
(9) GE = 1.7 and C,, = 2.3
Figure 15: Concentric
mixing predictions
various C,, and C,, values.
for R, = 6.0 by the standard
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
k-E model for
Project
30
F048
Downstream
Status Report
January 2000
distance
D
2D
3D
4D
5D
(a) C2 = 1.2
(b) C2 = 1.9
(d) C2 = 2.2
(e) C2 = 2.3
Figure 16: Concentric mixing
various C2 values.
predictions
for R, = 1 .O by the realizable
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
k-E model for
Project
31
F048
Downstream
Status Report
January 2000
distance
D
2D
3D
4D
5D
(a) C, = 1.9
(b) C, = 2.1
(d) C2 = 2.3
(e) C2 = 2.5
Figure 17: Concentric mixing
various C2 values.
predictions
for R, = 6.0 by the realizable
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
k-E model for
32
Project F048
D
2D
Status Report
January 2000
3D
4D
5D
(C >
Downstream distance
D
2D
3D
4D
5D
Figure 18: Comparisons between the experimental and predicted mixing regions for R,
= 1.04. (a) Representative experimental image, (b) standard k-E model
predictions, and (c) realizable k-E model predictions.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
33
Project F048
I
I
2D
Downstream distance
D
Status Report
January 2000
3D
2D
3D
I
4D
4D
5D
Figure 19: Comparisons between the experimental and predicted mixing regions for R,
= 2.02. (a) Representative experimental image, (b) standard k-E model
predictions, and (c) realizable k-E model predictions.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
34
Project F048
I
I
I
D
Status Report
January 2000
I
2D
3D
I
4D
I
5D
(a1
Downstream distance
D
2D
3D
4D
5D
Figure 20: Comparisons between the experimental and predicted mixing regions for R,
= 2.95. (a) Representative experimental image, (b) standard k-E model
predictions, and (c) realizable k-E model predictions.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
35
Project F048
D
2D
Status Report
January 2000
3D
4D
5D
(C )
Downstream distance
D
2D
3D
4D
5D
Figure 21: Comparisons between the experimental and predicted mixing regions for R,
= 3.87. (a) Representative experimental image, (b) standard k-E model
predictions, and (c) realizable k-E model predictions.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
36
Project F048
D
Downstream distance
2D
D
Status Report
January 2000
3D
2D
3D
4D
4D
5D
5D
Figure 22: Comparisons between the experimental and predicted mixing regions for R,
= 4.95. (a) Representative experimental image, (b) standard k-E model
predictions, and (c) realizable k-8 model predictions.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
37
Project F048
D
Downstream distance
2D
D
Status Report
January 2000
3D
2D
3D
4D
4D
5D
5D
Figure 23: Comparisons between the experimental and predicted mixing regions for R,
= 6.02. (a) Representative experimental image, (b) standard k-E model
predictions, and (c) realizable k-E model predictions.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
38
F048
Status Report
January 2000
I
I
5
l
I
I
I
I
4
I
I
b
I
17
- 3 3
-I
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
I
I
I
Experimental
Estimates
I
1 -I
Standard k-e Model
I
- ------------ Realizable k-e Model
-
I
0
0
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
RV
Figure 24: Qualitative
values.
comparisons
between
the experimental
and predicted
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
L,/D
Project
39
F048
Status Report
January 2000
Fiber
A
0
/
I
I / /
:/
/I
/
’I
0
Y
Figure 25: Theoretical
cr 1
model to the effective
Newtonian
Fluid
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
Y cr 2
Shear Rate, f
fiber viscosity.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
40
Project F048
13 APPENDIX
A
This appendix contains
part of Project FO04.
13.1
Report
Status Report
January 2000
summaries
of the various
reports
completed
by Dr. Wang as
I
Wang, X., “On the Research Areas
Company Report, Project FO04 Report
of Approach Flow Systems”,
1, March 1996.
IPST Member
Report 1 provided an outline of potential research directions related to approach flow
systems. It contained a brief summary of a telephone survey of various PAC members
on approach flow problems. This survey was conducted in the Fall of 1995. The report
also included current design recommendations
from Voith, Beloit, Valmet, and TAPPI
Technical Information
Sheets. This report concluded by providing a research plan on
approach flow systems.
13.2
Report
2
Wang, X., Anderson, T., Snyder, C., and Marziale, M., “On the Causes of Basis
Weight Variability”,
IPST Member Company Report, Project FO04 Report 2, September
1998.
This report analyzed various signals from a paper machine to try to determine
precursors to basis weight nonuniformity.
The recorded signals included thick stock flow
rate, consistency
at eight different stock locations, local inlet and exit pressure of the
pressure pulsation attenuator,
beta-gauge
scanner position, and beta-gauge
basis
weight. The signals were sampled at a high frequency (100 Hz), and various signal
analysis techniques
were used to identify signal variances.
Numerous peaks in the
power spectrum were identified, but the associated causes were not discussed.
13.3
Report
3
Wang, X., Feng, Z., and Forney, L.J., “Computational
Simulation of Turbulent Mixing
with Mass Transfer”, IPST Member Company Report, Project FO04 Report 3, March
1998.
The use of ADINA software, and a k-E turbulence
model to predict the threedimensional
mixing with mass transfer in various geometries
was presented
in this
report. All calculations
assumed that the rheology of a low consistency
fiber suspension
was similar to water. Therefore, the mixing process was modeled as two turbulent
miscible fluids with the same density and viscosity, but with different concentrations
of
an inert tracer.
Modeling transverse
mixing with various injection angles from 30” to 150”, in 30”
increments,
revealed a 90” pipe mixer provided the best mixing. However, these mixers,
as well as those with injection angles greater than 90”, produced large scale vortices
where floes could form in actual approach flow systems. These mixer types may also
impact the opposite pipe wall and create pressure pulsations in approach flow systems.
Although jets with injection angles less than 90” are less efficient mixers, they are less
likely to impact the opposite wall. This type of jet mixer was recommended
for the pulp
and paper industry, but a longer mixing length would be required to compensate
for the
loss in mixing efficiency.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
41
F048
Status Report
January 2000
Compared
with a single 90” transverse jet mixer, the mixing efficiency of transverse
multijet mixers, each with a 90” jet inlet, was much better. Multijet mixers with an even
number of jets equally spaced around the pipe performed
better than an odd number of
jets. No explanation
for this phenomena
was provided.
Concentric pipe mixers were shown to be more effective
mixer. Mixing was also shown to be unaffected
by concentric
than a single transverse
mixer nozzle shape.
F.inally, mixing in geometries
that would represent pulp and paper silo operations
entering a fan pump were completed.
It was shown that increasing the outlet pipe length
will improve the mixing efficiency. A corner cut in the silo was shown to reduce, rather
than enhance, inert tracer concentration
uniformity.
13.4
Report
4
Feng, Z., Wang, X., and Forney, L.J., “Single Jet Mixing at Arbitrary Angle in
Turbulent Tube Flow”, IPST Member Company Report, Project FO04 Report 4, March
1998.
This report considered
a transverse jet with injection angle &,, with 0” < e0 < 180”,
and derived asymptotic solutions for both jet trajectory and tracer concentration
profiles
in the region near the injection location. Both fluids were similar and the mixing occurred
between different concentrations
of an inert tracer. The asymptotic solutions matched
the existing experimental
data obtained from the literature.
13.5
Report
5
Wang, X., and Bloom, F., “Flow Induced Vibration of Submerged
and Inclined
Concentric Pipes with Different Lengths”, IPST Member Company Report, Project
Report 5, May 1998.
FO04
This report presented a mathematical
model for a submerged
concentric pipe
system‘with
both confined and unconfined
external flows (similar to silo flow right before
the fan pump). The natural frequencies
of the pipe system were determined
and it was
shown that the system contains low frequency oscillations around 1 Hz. This may cause
low frequency vibrations in inner pipes containing thick stock. It was suggested that to
minimize these oscillations,
(i) the pipe mass per unit length should be reduced, (ii) the
pipe flexural rigidity should be increased (or tapered pipes could be used), and/or (iii)
various structural supports should be added to the piping system.
The criteria where buckling or flutter occurred was not detailed. However, additional
conclusions
in this report included: (i) the longer the outer pipe was, the more
susceptible the inner pipe was to buckling or flutter; (ii) the pipe inclination angle and the
depth of the submerged
pipe system did not significantly
influence the characteristic
vibration behaviors; (iii) for a fixed volumetric flow rate, there was an optimal inner pipe
radius to minimize buckling or flutter; and (iv) increasing the outer pipe diameter for a
fixed volumetric flow rate reduced the inner pipe buckling or flutter.
13.6
Report
6
Wang, X., and Feng, Z., “A Note on Helmholtz Attenuators
with Air Cavity and
Membrane”,
IPST Member Company Report, Project FO04 Report 6, September
1998.
This report presented a derivation of an analytical expression
for the resonance
frequency of Helmholtz resonators with an air cavity and membrane.
This type of
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
42
Project F048
Status Report
January 2000
resonator can be used to absorb pressure waves with frequencies
similar to the
membrane
resonant frequency.
Suggested
design guidelines for these devices included
(i) increasing the neck length will decrease the natural frequency,
(ii) the membrane
natural frequency should be as low as possible to minimize the resonance frequency,
and (iii) the effect of changing the neck cross-sectional
area depends on the membrane
stiffness.
13.7
Report
7
Wang, X., and Bloom, F., “Stability Issues of Concentric Pipes Conveying Steady
and Pulsatile Fluids”, IPST Member Company Report, Project FO04 Report 7, April
1999.
modeling of a
This report extended the work of Report 5 and the mathematical
submerged
concentric pipe system with both confined and unconfined
external flows.
The criteria when buckling and flutter occurs was also specified in this report. It was
shown that frictional forces suppressed
flutter instability, and the longer the outer pipe,
the less likely flutter was to occur. Frictional forces also delayed buckling instability.
However, it was shown that the longer the outer pipe length, the more susceptible
the
inner pipe was to buckling. It was also noted that for current pipe system designs in the
pulp and paper industry with reasonable flow rates, the concentric pipe system was
stable.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
43
FLOW THRU POROUS MEDIA
STATUS REPORT
FOR
PROJECT F022
Seppo Karrila (PI)
March 8 - 9,200O
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
45
Project F022
Status Report
DUES-FUNDED PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Title:
Project Number:
PAC:
FLOW THRU POROUS MEDIA
F022
PAPERMAKING
Project Staff
Principal Investigator:
Seppo Karrila
PAC Subcommittee
P. Chaudhuri, J. Shands,
R. Sieberth
FY 99-00 Budget:
$104,000
Time Allocation:
Principal Investigator:
25%
Supporting Research:
Special Students:
Andres Navia (MS)
RESEARCH LINE/ROADMAP: Line #ll - Improve ratio of product performance to cost
for pulp and paper products by 25% by developing breakthrough paper making and
coating processes which can produce the innovative webs with greater uniformity than
achieved by current processes.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE: Improve control of the layered structure in thickness direction,
by clarifying the mechanisms affecting formation and retention on the wire section. Strive
to decouple formation and retention.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: The SOTA was reviewed for formation-improtiing
wire
section elements as well as for splitting methods enabling layered analysis (tools needed
for quantification
of structure). Experiments
with saturated in-plane flow on nip
compression
were reported. Drawings (in Finnish, European standards and parts list,
with some needs for “debugging”)
for a pulsating handsheet
former were acquired, with
device construction
dependent
on budget allocation.
MILESTONES:
Implement pulsating handsheet
forming capability at IPST.
Acquiring an MBDT (Moving Belt Drainage Tester) device is under way and will
be accomplished
by the end of this fiscal year (June 2000).
Quantify dominant benefits of research into wire-section phenomena.
Survey opinions from select DFRC members by Spring 2000 PAC.
lnitia te numerical modeling of parficle migration during forming.
The model is used to identil
the dominant phenomena
determining
retention
(layetwise),
to design MBDT experiments
and to interpret results. Blocks of the
model will be presented in Spring 2000 PAC meeting.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
46
Project F022
Status Report
DELIVERABLES:
Improved diagnostic laboratorv methods for analvzing the structure of paper samples.
Enabling characterization techniques necessary for quantitative experimental
results are also coupled to troubleshooting printability and curl.
L&orator-v procedures for maximizin_asolids content off couch and tunina the stock
composition.
Development and validation of Mf3DT device and laboratory procedures for
retention and drainage studies will enable fast laboratory studies improving
dewatering and machine efficiency at a low cost and with a wide range of
parameters, in comparison with pilot studies.
Retrofit technoloav using next generation forming elements to decouple formation and
retention.
Opportunities are identified through mechanism studies and applied through
innovations.
STATUS
OF GOALS
FOR FY 99-00:
March 2000 PAC qoals.
Quantify dominant benefits of research into wire-section phenomena.
Identify key gaps in forming and dewatering on the wire section and
estimate the economic implications. The survey will be reported in the
Spring 2000 PAC meeting.
Initiate numerical modeling of particle migration during forming.
Phenomena and models related to particle migration have been reviewed
to assess where improvement over published models is needed for
papermaking application, and to enable composing an improved
numerical model based on phenomenological equations describing the
essential phenomena. The review is included in this report.
Current fiscal vear qoals. (Status will be reported in March 2000 PAC meeting.)
Implement pulsating handsheet forming capability at IPST.
IPST has made a capital allocation that enables construction of the MBDT
device. The drawings have been reviewed in detail, improved where
necessary, and organized into several subassemblies so that machining
work can be subcontracted to external machine shops as separate subprojects.
Develop experimental plan for application of the MBDT.
The direction taken is decided in the March 2000 PAC meeting, largely
based on results of the survey mentioned above.
Adopt and improve dry splitting and image analysis techniques that are used as a
tool to inspect wire-section effects on layered structure.
A set of pilot-run samples in which the jet/wire speed difference has been
varied will be inspected. A flatbed scanner with through lighting capability
has been acquired and is connected to an existing image analysis system
at IPST. Intermediate status with these samples and techniques is
reported in the March 2000 PAC meeting.
A supporting MS-project has been initiated, with focus on the curl of fine
paper. In this project Andres Navia will apply layerwise analysis of paper
samples from a collaborating mill to assess the root causes of curl.
Layerwise orientation and possibly also fines/filler distributions will be
inspected.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
47
Project F022
Status Report
SCHEDULE: The project schedule should tabulate the major tasks of the project that
were scheduled to be worked on from the last spring PAC until the end of this fiscal year.
The schedule should indicate the approximate dates when each task was to begin and
when each task was scheduled to be completed. The completion of a major task is
referred to as a project milestone. Time is usually expressed in quarters.
Task Descriptions
1999
(example)
Apr - Jun
1. MBDT quotes,
getting funding
allocation
2. Design
“debugging”
3. Build Eauipment
j&Instrumentation
I
I 5. Initial testina
I
6. Initiate migration
modelina
numerical
8. PAC report
1999
July - Sept
1999
Ott - Dee
mm-X
2000
Jan - Mar
I a----X
2000
Apr-Jun
I
SUMMARY OF RESULTS:
Dry splitting of sheet samples was demonstrated in a troubleshooting case. Analysis of
fiber orientation from thin peeled layers provided information not available from SEM
microphotographs or from ultrasonic scans, and was helpful in solving the problem.
The construction of MBDT pulsating drainage device resumed after Fall 1999 PAC
meeting; it was dropped in Spring 1999 due to budget constraints. Device is expected to
be available for initial testing before the end of this fiscal year.
To enhance understanding of the mechanisms determining retention, and its layerwise
profile in the paper web, numerical simulation of the particle migration phenomena is
being initiated. Fundamental aspects related to building an appropriate model from the
paper forming perspective are discussed in some detail within this reporf. The key
element absent from earlier models with flow through formed web layers is the
detachment of migrating particles. This appears to be the phenomenon responsible for
filler depletion at the water exit surface of a formed web, possibly in combination with
layerwise compression during a suction pulse.
SUMMARY OF KEY CONCLUSIONS:.
A clear need for improvement in paper related parficle retention modeling has been
identified and will be pursued, to quantify the mechanisms determining thicknessdirection filler profiles.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
48
F022
Status
Report
Particle migration during forming, review of fundamentals
SIGNIFICANCE
APPROACH
C. RESULTS
Published models re Iated to paper-making
Deposition
Turbulent agitation without mat formation
Retentionduring drainagewith mat formation
Filtration through preformedweb
Steadymodelsand surveydata
Hydrodynamic particle release in general
Entrapment of particles
Interaction of migration with permeability
Connections with industrypractice
D. CONCLUSIONS
ScientiJic Conclusions
Economics
Deliverables
D. REFERENCES
A.
B.
A. Significance
Dues-funded
Project F022 at IPST seeks to improve the balance
formation on the wire section. To achieve this goal, a mechanistic
of these is necessary to suggest developments
in the equipment
between retention and
understanding
of each
or operation practices.
A laboratory forming capability with pulsating dewatering-a
so-called MBDT device-is
under development
at IPST. In practice, realistic z-direction profiles of pulp fines and
fillers have only been observed when a web is formed under pulsating dewatering with
somewhat
realistic consistency;
such capability is essential for inspecting the
mechanisms
affecting retention.
Conventional
handsheet forming operates with smooth water removal and very low fiber
consistency.
This leads to an “inverted z-profile” of filler content, with enrichment
on the
wire side. Published modeling work appears capable of qualitatively
matching this
process, but unable to explain retention phenomena
in a realistic situation. Still, models
are the main tools needed to interpret experimental
data, so an improved model is a
necessity.
The purpose
order to
of this review is to inspect
the fundamental
phenomena
and mechanisms
in
guide the design of experiments
with the MBDT
aid in interpreting
results from experiments
l
develop both qualitative and quantitative
understanding
of the active mechanisms,
and facilitate numerical simulation of particle migration
A task agreed to with the subcommittee
steering this project, for the March 2000 review,
is to “initiate numerical simulation of particle migration during forming.” This review is
part of the task mentioned,
surveying available qualitative and quantitative
information to
be used in numerical simulation.
l
0
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
49
Status Report
B. Approach
Published literature is reviewed to collect submodels related to particle migration. These
models will support numerical simulations for either qualitative trends to inspect the
relative importance of various phenomena, or quantitative simulations and parameter
identification based on experiments.
Even a qualitative model can provide insights for modifying the process-a well-known
example is Wahlstrom’s wet pressing theory and transversal flow presses.
A quantitative model should be able to predict the effects of changes in the dewatering
profile on the thickness direction profile of migrating components in the web being
formed, and on total retention. Calibrating the prediction could be based on current
operating conditions on machine or on laboratory experiments that enable parameter
identification.
C. Results
To gain an understanding of what is missing from papermaking related models, first
these are reviewed, and then more generic modeling of particle migration is inspected.
The conclusions will emphasize the improvements considered necessary in modeling
retention during paper forming.
Published models related to papermakinq
The literature related to papermaking concentrates on the deposition of fillers. As noted,
these models are good for steady forming at low fiber consistency, while pulsating
forming at realistic consistency is still not well understood. The reader will observe that
particle detachment in the paper-forming related models is only considered in cases
where no web is formed and turbulent agitation is applied.
Deposition
The majority of papermaking related experiments have dealt with turbulent agitation of a
suspension of fiber and filler and examination of filler content in samples devoid of fibers
to assess the filler concentration in suspension as opposed to filler adsorbed on fibers.
In a case where web is formed, the options are to inspect retention in a realistic situation
with simultaneous forming, or to assess the more well-defined, simpler situation with
filtration through a preformed web. The simpler situation is naturally more amenable to
modeling and interpretation of results.
.
Turbulent aqitation without mat formation
These experiments are pertinent to stock handling prior to and within the headbox.
Alince et al. provide a detailed derivation of an adaptation of Langmuir kinetics to model
the deposition/detachment balance of filler on pulp fibers. He notes that aggregates of
fillers will have both faster deposition rate and higher maximum coverage than welldispersed filler [Alince 911.Causing aggregation of fillers prior to deposition would then
seem kinetically advantageous, but avoiding aggregation maximizes the light-scattering
effect of filler [Alince 961.
The observations of Middleton et al. support the Langmuir-type deposition/detachment
balance for turbulent suspensions; a static model under equilibrium is inspected
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
50
Status Report
[Middleton 911. The authors note that fiber consistency has a significant effect on the
apparent retention, since increasing the amount of fluid with filler concentration in
balance with some adsorption level on fibers means increasing the amount of filler not
adsorbed but suspended in fluid. This matches the practical experience that forming at
high consistency improves retention.
Kamiti et al. continued along the same lines, inspecting the effects of PEI with calcium
carbonate, using the model provided by Alince. They once more confirmed the Langmuir
kinetics for turbulent agitation without mat formation [Kamiti 941.
Retention durinq drainaqe with mat formation
van de Ven discussed the retention of small particles, such as dispersed filler, during
forming. He concluded that particle attachment during forming is not significant, instead,
most of the particles retained are deposited on the fibers earlier on in the process D/en
841. Note the assumption of fillers being in dispersed state; fillers attached to migrating
fines or in agglomerated state may behave quite differently.
Wei et al. modeled the forming process in a handsheet mold, with analytical solutions
reached using simplifying assumptions. The model predicts maximum deposition on the
wire side, due to these layers “filtering” the suspension for a longer period of time than
the top layers of the web. No effect of retention level on drainage through permeability
changes is included. The mat is assumed incompressible in this work. Simulation results
were compared with experimental observations published by others, and a satisfactory
match was found [wei 961.
Wildfong et al. developed a laboratory drainage tester operating at realistic consistency
and drainage rate for forming low basis weight mats-pilot trial data is presented and
was used to guide the design. A constant vacuum level drives the drainage, so the
superficial flow rate is not constant. The flow resistance of the wire was accounted for on
calculating the permeability of the formed mat, and a decreasing trend in permeability
was observed with accumulation of formed web [Wildfong 981.
Further work with the same device showed that the fines content is the dominating factor
determining permeability of formed webs. Observations were presented for furnishes
with intentionally varied fines contents to examine this aspect. The authors conclude that
compressibility effects are secondary in determining permeability, at least in comparison
with fines retention [Wildfong 991. Possibly for the case without fines, with a low basis
weight, the compressibility effects on permeability are low-however, the experiments
did not show that at a fixed fines content, compressibility effects would be absent.
Wildfong et al. also showed that the thickness direction retention profiles were almost
uniform for both pulp fines and fillers, in spite of the rapid drainage rate affecting overall
retention. Fines migration during forming was demonstrated experimentally by
application of layerwise analysis of formed sheets [Wildfong 99b].
Sutman improved a pulsating drainage tester, which uses a rotating foil under the
forming wire, by increasing the stock consistency to realistic level and adjusting the
operating conditions to get realistic retention levels (coarser wire and moderate vacuum
application during drainage). He developed various indicators that correlate with mill
observations on the effects of additives, as regards drainage rate and formation [Sutman
991.An interesting observation was the effect of peak vacuum level applied during
drainage and dewatering on the final air permeability of the partially saturated sheet; this
indicates that the compression level does cause a structure change affecting
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
51
Status Report
permeability. The basis weights examined were above 50 gpsm, in reasonable
alignment for comparison with Wildfong’s results. Compression effects on permeability
may well exist for webs formed with realistic fines content, under ordinary drainage
conditions.
Filtration throuqh preformed web
Ramarao developed a relatively complicated micro-model for particle deposition on
fibers. Collection efficiency would describe the rate of capture onto a fiber from the set of
bypassing particles [Ramarao 931.
Al-Jabari et al. presented a model in which the (in the plane of the web) nonuniform
permeability of a preformed web was mathematically treated as axial dispersion. The
mechanism by which this affected retention was through residence-time distribution of
the filler-loaded liquid with the adsorbing fibers. Experiments showed that the
breakthrough curves of particles passing through a fiber bed matched the model well for
the most part [Al-Jabari 94 and 94b].
Vengimalla et al. used a continuum approach, matching model equations to experiments
in a fiber-packed column. Pressure and porosity as well as filler concentration profiles
were measured in a fiber bed during filtration. The permeability and retention aspects
were uncoupled in the model: retention was assumed not to affect local permeability
[Vengimalla 961. Particle release was included in the model, but in a simplified form that
did not consider hydrodynamically induced detachment.
Steady models and survey data
Webb has published a steady model, basically a species balance calculation, for
inspecting the fluxes of the solids as well as chemicals that partly get adsorbed on fiber,
fines, or filler, and partly remain in solution. The purpose of his model is to facilitate cost
analysis of effluent treatment processes, and chemical or fiber gains from increasing
retention. He states that the equilibration of the white-water system depends mainly on
water consumption and single-pass retention (meaning the dynamics or time-constant of
the system) [Webb 871.
Britt and Unbehend published in 1983 a survey of 43 commercial machines, examining
their retention levels. The data showed single-pass retention of total fines being about
29% for twin-wire machines, ranging between 18 and 43%. Corresponding data for
single-wire machines had, on average, 39% pulp fines retention and 29% filler retention,
suggesting that the filler retention on twin-wire machines is only about 20% (filler
retention is poorer than the retention of pulp fines or total fines). The loss of fines (out of
the system instead of into the product) was about 24% for unfilled twin-wire cases [Britt
831.
The more recent survey of Korpi, concerning wood-containing grades in Finland, shows
approximately similar retention levels [Korpi 921. From a figure included in this
publication, filler retention can be roughly estimated to be of the order 30%.
Hvdrodvnamic particle release in qeneral
While papermaking related modeling has typically focused on particle capture and
neglected particle release, the results have also been applicable only to handsheet
forming. Typical “steady” handsheet forming will not show fines and filler depletion at the
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
52
Status Report
wire side, instead, there will be enrichment due to more flow through the first formed
layers of the web.
To make the models compatible with the commercially observed depletion on the wire
side, either on fourdriniers or on using loadable blades with twin-wire forming, we need
to incorporate detachment or release of particles. The particles may be pulp fines, fillers,
or aggregates composed of these.
The fundamentals of hydrodynamically induced particle release have been studied by
Hubbe, among others. After a discussion of the general phenomenology [Hubbe 841, he
published results from a turbulent shear-flow experiment in a Couette-type device
[Hubbe 851. He also compared the hydrodynamic effects with centrifugal effects, to
conclude that the mechanism of detachment is particle rolling (not sliding or lifting). In
accordance, tangential forces are the most efficient for releasing particles attached to
some surface.
Pendse used a rotating disk immersed in a beaker to impose hydrodynamic shear forces
on particles adhering to the disk. He studied the effects of pH and salt concentration and
how these would affect filler retention [Pendse 851.
Sharma confirmed the results of Hubbe by experiments with laminar Poiseuille flow
compared with centrifugation. In particular, he discussed the effects of surface
roughness and elasticity on the critical shear stress required for hydrodynamic
detachment-it appears that elasticity and roughness are very significant factors in
somewhat idealized model systems [Sharma 921. Later on Das continued to refine the
micromechanical theoretical aspects [Das 941.
In general it is agreed that for a single particle, there is a critical torque that initiates the
rolling motion and detachment. This critical torque correlates with the average wall shear
stress due to fluid flow, and so a critical shear stress is a sufficient descriptor. Similarly,
a critical flow rate in some fixed geometry could be given. If the flow is turbulent, the
fluctuations in fluid-particle interaction will impose a random component, and with a
constant average flow field, there will be a detachment probability over any time step-a
particle can remain attached for a while and then be detached after an apparent time
delay. On the other hand, the particle-wall interaction through a fluid layer is strongly
dependent on the gap size, so after particle detachment its initial motion will be slow,
possibly giving the impression of some time delay.
Another component of randomness, also pertinent to laminar flow, is the distribution of
attachment forces for a population of particles. The attachment forces depend strongly
on local contact, with dependence on shape, roughness, and elasticity, even in a nearly
ideal case (such as spherical particles on a plane surface). The critical shear stresses
for the particle population have a corresponding distribution.
Finally, the “collectors” in a fibrous bed are nearly cylindrical, not planar. Even with
laminar flow, the impaction probability and detachment forces will have a distribution
around the cylindrical collector, which is typically oriented transverse to the flow
direction. A change in flow direction will change these distributions and may lead to
immediate detachment of a large amount of particles, due to local elevation of shear
stress. The particle collection process should have much slower dynamics and will not
react as quickly to changes in the flow field.
The references above provide some model equations that can be used in numerical
simulations of particle detachment.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
53
Status Report
Entrapment of particles
Once particles are released to migrate with the flow, either they will be entrapped and
fixed in position, or they will be purged out of the fibrous web with drainage water.
Particles that are large relative to the pore constrictions can be entrapped individually
even from a very dilute solution, while small particles are susceptible to multipatticle
blocking provided that their concentration in the liquid is sufficiently high. Multiparticle
blocking has been observed for particles significantly smaller than the pore constriction,
down to about 1% in diameter.
Concentration of the particles in the fluid is decisive for multiparticle blocking, also called
bridging. Typically there exists a critical particle concentration in the suspension, above
which a filter will tend to get plugged. Such plugging is observed by declining flow rate,
which would translate to a drainage problem on a paper machine.
Interaction of miqration with permeabilitv
It is well known that pulp fines significantly affect the specific surface of a fiber bed and
have a strong influence on drainage resistance-a reasonable assumption is that the
surface area depends linearly on the amount of fines, and affects permeability
correspondingly (Cozeny-Karman model). The work of Wildfong et al. has confirmed that
fines content in stock and its retention will strongly affect the intrinsic permeability of the
formed web.
Also, it appears reasonable that the fillers attached on fiber or pulp fines will affect
permeability only insignificantly. The only migrating component affecting permeability
would then be the pulp fines. Due to their large surface area, these should be able to
bond filler significantly, and the fines migration would also affect the filler distribution
within the web.
Since entrapment will affect the permeability, which in turn will affect the flow rate as well
as the release and migration of particles, we have a “feedback loop” requiring an
iterative solution eventually. The flow and migration equations should be coupled in a
model of general applicability.
Another aspect is the modification of void space by significant particle capture, leading to
higher local flow rates in the pores even when the superficial flow rate is constant (e.g.,
in a constant-rate filtration experiment). The increasing flow rate should increase local
particle detachment and limit capture.
Connections with industrv practice
Loadable blades are known to improve formation while retention deteriorates. Further, it
has been noted with pilot experiments reported in literature that retention improvement
due to increased roll dewatering may be set back by the drainage elements downstream
in the wire section. These observations support the conclusion that strong flow (pulses)
will deplete the migrating particles from the surface layers of the web.
Bachand notes in his review that positive pulses by blades lead to poor retention, which
may be improved by replacement foils having a sharp leading angle doctoring the wire
[Bachand 831.This can be interpreted in two ways in terms of potential mechanisms. In a
case where the formed web is incompressible, the positive pulse causes reversal of flow
direction, releasing particles in areas where the shear stresses increased due to the
change in flow. If, on the other hand, the positive pulse “loosens” the formed bottom
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
54
Status Report
layers, the following drainage pulse would cause a sharp compression and an initially
high flow rate, which will detach particles by strong shear forces.
D. Conclusions
Scientific Conclusions
The fines and filler depletion observed on web surfaces created during forming is
incompatible with results from models only considering particle collection. These models
are sufficient to explain results from smooth slow drainage, with low fiber consistency, as
in a regular handsheet mold.
The apparent retention of fines and fillers is, theoretically, strongly dependent on fiber
consistency during forming; realistic forming experiments should be performed with
realistic stock consistency when retention is inspected.
Even high drainage rate forming with steady vacuum and realistic stock consistency has
shown almost uniform thickness direction profiles of fines and filler, in contrast with
experience from machine formed samples. Apparently only pulsating forming causes
realistic filler depletion on the water exit surface of the formed web. A theoretical basis
exists for the phenomenological description of particle detachment caused by flow
(hydrodynamically induced detachment), which could explain the phenomena due to flow
pulses also. Such models have not been applied to papermaking but appear necessary
for understanding the z-direction profiles of fines and filler created by various forming
conditions.
Experiments with turbulent agitation without mat formation abound, and they are
descriptive of filler attachment to fibers prior to forming on the wire. During forming the
porous flow is expected to be laminar, not turbulent, and particle collection will likely take
place mainly in the case of pulp fines, while particle release can concern both these and
adsorbed filler.
The main causes of particle detachment include change in flow direction within the
formed web, and fluid flow rates that exceed a critical detachment level. Detrimental
effects on retention are associated with pulsating dewatering which may have two
origins from the viewpoint of flow through a fibrous filter: the positive pulses on leading
edges causing reversed flow and, possibly, loosening of the formed mat, and the initially
high flow rates during mat compaction in the beginning of a suction pulse. A further
possibility is that the formed fiber mat is redispersed by a positive pulse and then
reformed.
If the fiber bed were homogeneous and incompressible and the flow unidirectional (no
positive pulses), particle depletion at the surface of the web appears very difficult to
explain. In reality the fiber/wire interaction makes the web inhomogeneous in thickness
direction, but this effect is difficult to model and a first modeling attempt should neglect it.
Whether the effects of positive pulses are dominating needs experimental inspection,
using the pulsating drainage tester.
A homogeneous compressible fiber bed under pulsating drainage provides a reasonable
explanation for filler depletion at the web surface, even without positive pulses. The
surface layers get compressed and release water, leading to initially high flow rate at the
surface. In upper layers there is initially not much relative motion of water and fiber, and
the relative flow rates remain small because of the accumulated flow resistance of layers
IPST Confidential
information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
55
Status Report
below. The surface layers get a different treatment from the inner layers, when
compressibility is assumed.
The only explanations for surface depletion that do not consider particle detachment are
redispersion and inhomogeneity of fiber layers due to interaction with the wire. Modeling
these aspects may be necessary if a simpler approach, using available fundamental and
phenomenological knowledge, does not lead to reasonable results.
Economics
To facilitate actual dollar value estimates of improved retention, this section presents
some data available from the literature reviewed. As the value of improved quality is
typically difficult to quantify, the data below relates to cost reduction.
Gavelin mentions several benefits of improved retention:
decreased loss of solids
lower headbox consistency improving formation
lower load on saveall
less renewed drainage with same fines and fillers recirculated
less wire wear (due to quartz particles coming in with clay)
He also states that high filler content of white water causes serious operating problems
[Gavelin 751.
Britt and Unbehend published data on the fines loss, meaning the difference of fines
mass through the headbox and in the final sheet. This loss was of the order of 20%
(somewhat lower for fourdrinier and higher for twin-wire) in unfilled cases, and increases
with filler content [Britt 831. Further, fines recirculation gives them an opportunity to
adsorb colorant materials, which can lead to brightness loss. Additionally the
recirculation increases deposits and loss of solids from the saleable product.
Webb’s calculations indicate that when the degree of adsorption is 70%, the value of lost
additive equals that of additive in the product when water consumption is about 20 tons
water per ton of product. The lost additive amount is about half of that retained in the
product, if the water consumption is lowered to 10 tons water per ton product [Webb 871.
The loss of chemical additives is then of the order of one third of purchase price. Webb
also mentions the environmental cost of cleaning the mill effluent, and the effect of
retention level on equilibration dynamics of the wet end.
Deliverables
The review presented is used to design experiments with the MBDT and to examine the
results of these experiments.
A simulation including detachment of particles will be constructed to examine the effects
of drainage rate on filler profiles. It is expected that the simulation will show particle
depletion on the wire side, and further there will exist a drainage rate above which this
depletion leads to “frown-shaped” profiles.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
56
Status Report
D. References
Alince 91
Alince,B.; Petlicki,J.; van de Ven, T.G.M.
Colloids and Surfaces 59(1991) 265-277
Alince 96
Alince, B.
Tappi Journal 79, no. 3: 291-294 (March 1996).
Al-Jabari 94
Al-Jabari, M.; van de Ven, T.G.M.; van Heiningen, A.R.P.
Journal of Pulp and Paper Science 20, no. 9: J249-253 (September 1994).
Al-Jabari 94b
Al-Jabari, M.; van de Ven, T.G.M.; van Heiningen, A.R.P.
Journal of Pulp and Paper Science 20, no. 10: J289-295 (October 1994).
Bachand 83
Bachand, J.P.
TAPPI Wet-End Operations Seminar (Appleton, WI) Notes: 263-268 (May 8-13,
1983).
Britt 83
Britt, K.; Unbehend, J.
ESPRI Research Reports, 79:1 SUNY College of Environmental Science and
Forestry (Syracuse) (NY) 78 (October 15, 1983).
Das 94
Das, S.K.; Schechter, R.K.; Sharma, M.M.
J. Colloid and Interface Science 164, 63-77 (1994).
Gavelin 75
Gavelin, G.; Odell, P.O.; Vyse, R.N.
Svensk Papperstid. 78, no. 11: 392-399 (Aug. 25, 1975).
Hubbe 84
Hubbe, M.A.
Colloids and Surfaces 12(1984) 151-l 78.
Hubbe 85
Hubbe, M.A
Colloids Surfaces 16: 227-270 (1985).
Kamiti 94
Kamiti, M.; van de Ven, T.G.M.
Journal of Pulp and Paper Science 20, no. 7: J199-205 (July 1994).
Korpi 92
Korpi, T.
Wochenbl. Papietfabr. 120, no. 16: 638 (Aug. 31, 1992).
Middleton 91
Middleton, S.R.; Scallan, A.M.
CPPA Ann. Mtg. (Montreal) Preprints 77B: B35-46 (Jan. 31-Feb. 1, 1991).
Pendse 85
Pendse, H.P.
TAPPI Papermakers Conf. (Denver) Proc.: 259-264 (April 15-l 7, 1985).
Ramarao 93
Ramarao, B.V.
1993 Engineering Conference (Book 2), 455-476
Sharma 92
Sharma, M.M.; Chamoun, H.; Sarma, D.S.H.S.R.; Schechter, R.S.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
57
Status Report
J. Colloid and Interface Science Vol. 149, No. 1, March 1, 1992, 121434.
Ven 84
van de Ven, T.G.M.
J. Pulp Paper Sci. IO, no. 3: J57-63 (May 1984).
Vengimalla 97
Vengimalla, R., Chase, G., Ramarao, B., Das, S.
1997 Engineering and Papermakers Conference, 1435-l 449.
Webb 87
Webb, L. J.
Paper Technol. Ind. 28, no. 3: 478-479, 481-483 (April 1987).
Wei 96
Wei, H., Kumar, B., Ramarao, B.V., Tien,C.
J. Pulp and Paper Sci., 22(1 l), November 1996, J446-J451.
Wildfong 98
Wildfong, V.J., Shands, J.A., Genco, J.M., Bousfield, D.W.
TAPPI 98 Proceedings Engineering Conference, 927-939.
Wildfong 99
Wildfong, V.J., Shands, J.A., Genco, J.M., Bousfield, D.W.
TAPPI 99 Proceedings Engineering Conference, 1219- 1229.
Wildfong 99b
Wildfong, V.J., Shands, J.A., Genco, J.M., Bousfield, D.W.
TAPPI 99 Engineering/Process and Product Quality Conference & Trade Fair,
11739 1180.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F022
58
Status Report \
Some aspects of application potential of the MBDT
A. Significance
The Moving Belt Drainage Tester (MBDT) is being constructed at the IPST, and is
expected to be available for initial testing before the end of current fiscal year. It provides
exceptional capabilities in several respects, such as forming under conventional
headbox consistency, applying controllable vacuum level and vacuum pulse rate during
forming and dewatering, and providing timed mixing and agitation for chemicals addition
prior to forming. In addition to final solids content after some dewatering sequence, the
air flow through the wet web during high-vacuum dewatering (after the dry line) can be
measured.
The device has been demonstrated for laboratory-measurement based prediction of onmachine high-vacuum dewatering, and due to realistic (fourdrinier-type) sheet structure
- except for the isotropic fiber orientation distribution - can be used to characterize the
effects of stock or fiber properties on paper properties.
An application in the project F022 is inspection of fundamental phenomena in fines
migration during forming, but other aspects of value to the industry may be considered.
The purpose of this document is to discuss earlier reported results that have a bearing
on economic value estimates.
B. The MBDT principles
In the MBDT drainage takes place under pulsating suction. Instead of having a moving
wire the tester has a stationary wire and stationary suction box between which there is a
moving cogged belt. At intervals in the belt there is a row of punched holes which
expose the wire to the vacuum, experienced as vacuum pulses by “an observer fixed
onto the wire”. The belt speed is adjustable and the pulsation rate can be varied to a
maximum of hundreds of pulses per second. It has been shown that a sheet formed
under high pulsation rate possesses a similar structure, in terms of z-direction
distribution of fines, to that of paper formed on a fourdrinier type paper machine.
Vacuum level can be varied in a timed predetermined fashion during a single
experiment.
Three injectors are included in the design for the dosage of chemical additives enabling
the use of multi component retention aid systems. A variable speed stirrer provides
shear forces simulating those to which a furnish is subjected in the approach flow.
Vacuum level in the suction box and air flow rate through the formed sheet are
measured during an experiment. With individual suction pulses being very short, of the
order of 1ms, the dewatering on suction boxes and couch roll can be simulated.
An earlier version of the MBDT has been applied in Finland for several years, with
excellent results, in the following fashion. With a fixed vacuum level (a controllable
parameter) the dewatering is measured as a function of vacuum application time. A set
of such curves is constructed, and used in a calculation model to predict the dewatering
profile, based on given vacuum levels and effective vacuum application times on
machine. In this manner the effects of changes in the vacuum profile, or changes in the
headbox stock, on the solids off the couch can be predicted.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
59
Project F022
Status Report
C. Economic aspects
A consulting company (Papes Oy) made use of the MBDT vacuum dewatering
characterizations, in their projects on “Optimization of the use of energy in water removal
on a paper machine wire section” and on “Mill measurements of a vacuum system and
development of the analysing method” [Maijala 961.The summary report on these
projects indicates that using the current vacuum capacity, an average increase of 0.4%points in the solids content of the web after the wire section could be achieved in the
analyzed paper machines. Such an increase reduces the water load in the press section
by about 4%, with the reduction concentrating on the first nips. The report states that the
dewatering capacity of the beginning of the press section often limits the machine speed.
If no change in solids content is desired, on an average an energy saving potential of
15% was observed.
The drive power requirements are of similar order of magnitude as energy used for
vacuum pumping. In an energy optimization effort it is necessary to estimate the drive
power requirement for the wire section, and how it depends on the vacuum profile. This
is doable based on calibrating an estimation procedure with concurrent mill data.
Economic aspects of retention have been discussed earlier on within this report. The
MBDT has a significant bearing of retention studies, with timed mixing and agitation, and
mat formation.
While the 0.4% increase in solids may seem small, the wet strength of a paper web has
a strong dependence on the solids content, and the inertially caused tensile loads
depend on the moisture content. In combination these effects can have a significant
effect on runnability, in particular wet end breaks. On a single machine the cost of
breaks (energy, lost production,. . .), with 30-minute break occurring three times per day,
is of the order of a million dollars. Even a slight improvement has a significant economic
impact.
The retention aspects are also connected with runnability and wet end breaks, through
the stability of the white water recirculation.
Selection of furnish composition, based on inspection of both paper properties and
drainage/dewatering, the MBDT provides good potential. One published study compared
the drainage properties of different newsprint furnishes, SC and LWC base paper
grades, with the result that TMP possesses and advantage over PGW [Raisanen 961.
Similar work can be envisioned with various fillers, retention, drainage or formation
chemicals. No quantification of the value of such work is available at this time.
D. References
Maijala 96
Maijala, A.; Lahti, H., Report IO of the “Sustainable paper” program, KCL 1996 (in
Finnish)
Raisanen 96
Raisanen, K., Appita ‘96, pp. 655659.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s internal Use Only)
Project F022
60
Status Report
G. Figures
The MBDT device at APPI has the same basic design as the device under construction
at IPST. The belt loop is shown, with drive mechanism at the back wall and vacuum box
inside the loop.
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for PGblic Disclosure
(For IPSP Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
61
FLUID DYNAMICS
OF SUSPENSIONS
STATUS REPORT
FOR
PROJECT FO03
Cyrus K. Aidun (PI)
E-Jiang Ding
March 8 - 9,200O
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30318
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
62
63
Project FO03
Status Report
DUES-FUNDED PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Title:
Project Code:
Project Number:
PAC:
Fluid Dynamics of Suspensions
FDS
FO03
Papermaking
Project Duration:
1999 - 2005
Project Staff:
Faculty/Senior Staff:
Staff:
C. Aidun
E. Ding
Project Funding:
$70,000
for 1999100
RESEARCH LINE/ROADMAP: Line 11. Improve the ratio of Product Performance to Cost Models, algorithms, and functional samples of fibrous structures . . ., break-through
papermaking .. .processes.
BENEFITS TO INDUSTRY:
To increase the market share and profitability of the member companies by understanding the
physics of fiber suspensions in turbulent flow and optimizing the paper forming and coating
processes through break-through technologies in suspension transport to enhance quality and
reduce cost.
I.
Investigate the effect of turbulent flow on individual and collection of fibers in the
headbox and the forming section to find the most effective flow field for optimum
forming process in various paper grades;
II .
Based on the information obtained through the first objective, develop an optimum
forming process.
PROJECT DELIVERABLES:
1. A direct method for investigation
of individual
the headbox and the forming section,
results of fiber orientation
and collection
2.
Computational
headbox,
and interaction
3.
Optimum shape and design of a fiber network forming
for most effective fiber distribution in the sheet;
of fibers in turbulent
in the converging
device
section
flow of
of the
and other flow parameters
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
-
64
SCHEDULE:
Status Report
The project schedule to tabulate the major tasks of the project are:
Task Descriptions
(example)
1. Literature Survey
2. Computational
method
2.1 2-D
2.2 CPU optimization
2.3 3-D
3. Include turbulent flow
modeling
4. Experiments with
fiber in a converging
nozzle with turbulent
flow
5. Comparison between
computational &
experimental results
6. Final report
2000
Jan - Mar
-1-e--1-w--1-11---X
I--
2000
Apr - Jun
-I---------X
2000
Jul - Sep
2000
2001
Ott - Dee Jan - Mar
11----11- m----1-1111
X
m-9 -9X
-9-9-1111-w19
-9--1--m--- 111-11-1
X
----------1-1 -9-1-w-1-wX
-------II X
M-11-1
X
The method being developed is a hybrid of the finite element and lattice-Boltzmann methods.
In this method the motion of fiber in turbulent flow can be investigated in two steps: (1) first the
fluid flow pattern is computed without any fiber recording the pressure and velocity at every
node in the fluid; (2) the motion of the solid particle (i.e., the fiber) is obtained in the given flow.
The first step of the study can be done by finite element method followed by an improved
lattice-Boltzmann analysis of particle dynamics. The preliminary method for two-dimensional
flows have been developed. Before running this code, two data files, FIINP and FIOUT, must
be created by the finite element code, FIDAP. The first data file, FIINP contains locations of
every element and their nodes, while FIOUT includes pressure and velocity at every node. The
new code reads the information contained in these two files. The computational domain is
confined in a small box containing the fiber under consideration. When the fiber moves in the
fluid, the box moves simultaneously, keeping the fiber at its center. The pressure and velocity at
the boundary are determined by the information contained in the two data files. When the
computational domain is meshed by 4-node quadrilateral elements, the bilinear interpolation
function is used to determine the pressure and velocity at any point on the boundary of the box.
An important step in development of any computational method is the estimate of the
computational time required for analysis of practical problems. Assume that the lattice size
equals AX cwt , and the time step in lattice-Boltzmann method is At set, respectively. In this
section, a subscript s is used for variables in CGS unit, while a subscript 1 is used for those in
lattice-Boltzmann method.
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
65
Project FO03
Status Report
The viscosity in CGS unit and lattice-Boltzmann method is related by
Y
=- vsAt 2
(1)
(W
And, the characteristic speed in the two unit systems is connected by
u,At
.
Ul =Ax
(2)
In lattice-Boltzmann method, values for Y, and u, are confined in limited ranges. When
Y z < l/ 6 the collision operator is over-relaxing, while Y z > l/ 6 corresponds to the underrelaxing collision operator. Y I = l/6 is the natural choice for the simulation, since the viscous
stresses decay instantaneously. In computational analysis the range of Y is usually from l/30
to l/ 2. The characteristic speed, u,, should remain small, because, in the current hybrid
method, the lattice-Boltzmann calculation is carried out only in a small box, which contains the
fiber. The influence of the flow outside the box on the suspended fiber is transferred with the
speed of sound, as pressure pulses travel through fluid. If the box moved too fast in the fluid,
the flow on the boundary of the box would change rapidly. However, the flow in the box could
not change immediately, and the fluid around the fiber would remain at its previous velocity and
pressure. Then the results of the calculation would no longer be reliable. Hence the speed of
the box must be less than 0.1 in normalized units.
From relations 1 and 2, we find
(3)
and
At
(4)
.
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
_..
66
Project FO03
Status Report
The total CPU time for lattice-Boltzmann simulation, T , is proportional to (At)-' and (Ax)-”
where y1is 2 or 3 for two and three dimensional domains, respectively. Hence
T
oc
@S
(fs
The following
(5)
‘%)nc2
ly)“+l
-
examples illustrate the accuracy of the new hybrid method.
EXAMPLE 1: A CIRCULAR CYLINDER IN A SHEAR FLOW
To verify the accuracy of the new code, the results for a freely suspended circular cylinder in a
shear flow at the particle Reynolds number Re = 0.335 have been obtained with three different
computational approaches. The computational domain is shown in Figure I. The channel is
2Ocm long and 4cm wide. The fluid density and viscosity is p = 1.3g!cm3 and
p = 0.040625g /cm see, respectively. Velocities of the two walls are -)-U = +O&m/sec ,
respectively. The radius and density of the circular cylinder is r = 0.161875cmand
P = 1.3g / cm3 , respectively. Initially the cylinder is at rest, and its center is at
(x, y) = (1.625cm,l.96875cm) .
l
S
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
67
Project FO03
Status Report
Figure 1. A circular cylinder in a shear flow.
(1) STANDARD LB
,
The first calculation is carried out by the standard lattice-Boltzmann method. The size of the
channel is 320x64 lattice units. Results obtained by this calculation are presented with in
Figures 2 and 3 showing the trajectory of the center of the cylinder, as well as the angular
rotation rate of the cylinder, respectively. The rotation rate at steady state is 0.20lseC’. Since
the standard lattice-Boltzmann method (ALD code) is accurate in simulating the motion of
suspended circular cylinders in shear flow, the results of this calculation are reliable as well.
Results obtained by the new hybrid method will be compared with these results, as well.
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
68
FO03
Status Report
Standard LB
Hybrid LB
........................“..
r
Hybrid LB (smaller size)
1.95
1.94
1.93
0
25
X
Figure 2: Trajectories of the circle in the channel.
(2) HYBRID
LB
The purpose of this calculation is to test the validity of the new hybrid code. The pressure and
velocity fields are obtained by FIDAP. The size of the box covering the circular cylinder is 2 cm
x 2 cm, i.e., 32x32 lattice units. The radius of the circular cylinder is Y = 2.59 lattice units.
Results obtained by this calculation,
presented in Figures 2 and 3, show good agreement
with
the previous methods.
The rotating rate at steady state is 0.207 set-’ , only 3% larger than the
rate obtained by the standard LB.
(3) HYBRID
LB WITH
SMALLER
DOMAIN
SIZE
In order to test the influence of the domain size on the accuracy of the simulation results, the
size of the domain is reduced to be 1 cm x 1 cm, i.e., 16x16 lattice units. Results presented in
Figures 2 and 3 compares fair with previous calculations.
The rotating rate at steady state is
0.20 se? , about 9% larger than the rate obtained by the standard LB.
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
69
Project FO03
Status Report
0.23
Hybrid LB(smaller domain)
Hybrid LB
Q)
0.21
5
.IF
5
H
02.
Standard LB
0.19
0.18
20
25
Figure 3: Rotating rate of the circle in the channel
EXAMPLE 2: DYNAMICS OF AN ELONGATED ELLIPSE IN A CONVERGING NOZZLE
Flow of particles in a converging nozzle takes place in many applications including headboxes
and coater heads. A simplified version of this flow is used here as an example for application of
the hybrid lattice-Boltzmann method. The computational domain, shown in Figure 4, is a
converging channel 40cm long, where the inlet and the outlet are 1Ocm and lcm wide,
respectively. The fluid properties are that of water where viscosity is Y = 0.01cm2 /set , and
density is p = Q/cm’. A parabolic velocity distribution for u, with a maximum velocity equal
to lcm/sec is imposed, and the inlet velocity u, is zero. The major and minor axes of the
elongated ellipse are b = 0.05~~ and c = 0.005cm , respectively. The ellipse is neutrally
suspended with density, pc = lg/cm3 . Three initial positions at (x, y) = (O.lc~,lcm) ,
(x, y) = (O.lcm,2cm), and (x, y) = (O.lcm,4cm) are selected, where the initial angle from x-axis
to the major axis of the is always x =JC/ 2.
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
70
FO03
Status Report
*
Figure 4. An ellipse in a converging nozzle. Positions and orientations of the
ellipse at every 5 seconds are shown in this figure. Initial positions are at
a=(O.lcm,lcm)(open ellipse), b=(O.lcm,2cm)(gray ellipse), and
c=(O.lcm,4cm)(black ellipse), respectively.
The finite element computations
with FIDAP gives the flow pattern in the channel with
streamlines
as shown in Figure 5. A total of 4049 nodes are used to grid the computational
domain.
Following the finite element calculations,
the lattice-Boltzmann
computation
of the particle
dynamics with time step At is set to 1.5E-05 sec., k is 0.0015 cm, Y, = l/16, and
z = 0.6875 is performed.
The dimensions of the lattice Boltzmann computational
domain are
0.2x0.2 cm , or 128x128
lattice units. The major and minor axes of the elongated ellipse are
The particle at various initial positions generally
b = 32 and c = 3.2 lattice units, respectively.
accelerate to a maximum speed while drifting in the y direction to the centerline of the channel.
The angle of attach x decreases until the major axis becomes parallel to the streamline. When
Only the particle
near the outlet, the particles fluctuate in orientation about the fluid streamline.
at lowest initial position undergoes a full rotation by 180 degrees while turning with major axis
parallel to the streamline.
The same problem will be simulated with the regular lattice-Boltzmann
method to evaluate
accuracy and reliability of the hybrid technique.
After this step, and after the computational
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s internal Use Only)
the
Project FO03
71
Status Report
demand is reduced with the modified hybrid method, problems more relevant to headbox and
flows in a gap former will be investigated.
Fi4gure5: Streamlines in the converging nozzle.
Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
72
73
FUNDAMENTALS
OF
HEADBOX AND FORMING HYDRODYNAMICS
STATUS REPORT
FOR
PROJECT FO05
Cyrus K. Aidun (PI)
Paul McKay
March 8 - 9,200O
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30318
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
75
Project FO05
Status Report
DUES-FUNDED PROJECT SUMMARY
Project
Title:
Project
Project
PAC:
Code:
Number:
Project
FUNDAMENTALS
OF HEADBOX
FORMING HYDRODYNAMICS
FORM
FO05
PAPER MAKING
Staff
Principal
Investigator:
Co-Investigators:
Research
Support
Staff:
PAC Subcommittee
Cyrus
K Aidun
Paul McKay
D. Anderson
Chairman
$219,000
FY 99-00 Budget:
Time Allocation:
Principal
Research
AND
25%
95%
Investigator:
Support Staff:
Supporting
Research:
Ph.D. Students:
Special Students:
C. Park, H. Xu, M. Brown
K. Ono
Line #I 1 - Improve the ratio of product performance to cost for
LINE/ROADMAP:
pulp and paper products by 25% by developing break-through papermaking and coating
processes which can produce the innovative webs with greater uniformity than that achieved
with current processes
RESEARCH
PROJECT
OBJECTIVES
I. Investigate the fluid flow interaction with fiber network in a headbox and the forming section;
improve designs for reduction of floe formation and improvement of fiber dispersion in headbox
and the forming section;
II. Develop methods for measurement of the velocity profile in CD and MD of the forming jet
and influence on physical properties. Use this method as a diagnostics tool for process
optimization to improve formation and reduce consumption of raw material.
PROJECT
BACKGROUND
The two major areas in the project are to develop novel diagnostics
characterization
of the forming jet, as well as methods to control the
One such system for direct measurement
of the forming jet velocity
been completed to be used with commercial machines by a process
The other aspect of the project
sections of the headbox.
is to understand
the behavior
methods for
forming jet hydrodynamics.
and the turbulent /eve/ has
engineer at the mill.
of the fiber network
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
in various
Project
76
FO05
SUMMARY
Status
Report
OF RESULTS
In this section, we summarize the results and their applications.
IMMEDIATELY APPLICABLE RESULTS:
1. Development of the Surface Pattern Image Velocimetry (SPIV) method based on
two-dimensional cross-correlation of the high-speed digital images of the forming
jet has been completed and tested for forming jet velocity measurements.
Various techniques to increase the accuracy of the measurements have been
used to provide more accurate measurement of the forming jet velocity profile.
This method is now capable of surface velocity measurements with one percent
(1%) accuracy.
2. Automation of the SPIV method for the on-line measurement of the forming jet
velocity has been completed. The mills can use this method for evaluation of the
forming jet velocity profile.
PROGRESS
TOWARD
GOALS:
1. The two-component laser-Doppler velocity (LDV) measurements of the
streamwise velocity and azimuthal component of the mean and turbulent
fluctuations through the step expansion tube has been completed as part of a
student project (CSP). These measurements provide details of the flow
characteristics in a headbox tube. With this information, and visualization of the
floe breakup and dispersion mechanism, the effectiveness of the headbox design
can be examined.
2. The floe dispersion mechanism at the step expansion section of the headbox
tube has been examined. Methods to quantify the floe breakup and fiber
dispersion as a function of flow rate and the dimension of the step change have
been developed. The results show strong correlation between the mean axial
velocity gradient through the transition from small diameter to larger diameter
tube and the floe breakup and fiber dispersion. The fiber dispersion seems to be
based on the turbulent eddy formation where the floe deformation, rupture and
breakup are from the extensional flow and radial stresses.
3. An automated SPIV system is constructed with the necessary software to use for
on-line optimization of process parameters in the forming section.
4. The SPIV method has been applied to a commercial system and results are used
for optimization of the process parameters to improve the fiber orientation profile.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
77
DELIVERABLES
Status
Report
FOR by June 00:
1. The velocity profile for the free-surface forming jet using the SPIV method;
2. An on-line mefhod for measurement of the CD velocity profile on the surface of the
forming jet as a diagnostics tool for process optimization,
DELIVERABLES
FOR FY 00-01:
1. Results from visualization of floe formation and breakup at various sections of the
headbox as a mean to understand and optimize process parameters for best formation;
2. An on-line method for measurement of the velocity profile along the thickness of the
forming jet from the s/ice to the impingement zone as a diagnostics tool for process
optimization.
3. Relation between the mean and averaged velocity profile and streaks in the forming jet
with the physical properties such as fiber orientation and dimensional instability;
4. The relation between velocity profile and the design features of the headbox;
5. Practical methods to optimize process parameters in order to-minimize velocity profile
nonuniformity, with the goal of improving uniformity of physical properties.
SCHEDULE:
The project schedule
for each of the deliverables
is provided
Task Descriptions
(example)
1. Floe
dispersion/formation
2. On-line vel. system
2.1 Exp. setup
2.2 Experiments
2.3 data analysis
2.4 interim report
3. Mean vel. and
surface patterns
4. Vel. profile
5. Minimize Vel.
Nonuniformity
6. Annual Report
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
below.
78
Project FO05
Status Report
RESULTS
The results are presented in this section with additional detail. The focus is on characterization
of the forming jet and the headbox hydrodynamics. The first section outlines a method based on
two-dimensional cross-correlation of the digital images to obtain the surface velocity profile of
the forming jet. This method provides more detailed information on the forming jet
hydrodynamics.
10.
Introduction
The forming jet velocity profile has a significant impact on the physical properties of finished
paper. It is believed that slight variations in the velocity profile can strongly affect fiber
orientation, forming table streaks and other such properties. In order to achieve a desired jet-towire ratio, the forming jet velocity is typically controlled using feedback from a pressure
transducer in the headbox with the jet velocity being calculated using Bernoulli’s streamline
equation. However with high levels of turbulence in the headbox the total head at the point of
the pressure measurement includes a non-negligible velocity head that varies with the flow rate.
Thus an equation for the total head of a free jet at a nozzle must include a term accounting for
the significant head losses resulting from the turbulent flow through the nozzle. These losses
vary for different headbox designs, flow rates and slice openings and the head-loss equations
must be determined empirically. In practice it is difficult to obtain jet velocity measurement with
accuracy better than two percent.
In order to study the impact of forming hydrodynamics on the physical properties of the sheet
we need accurate measurements of the jet velocity profile. Laser Doppler Velocimitry (LDV) is a
useful technique but it is limited in that it can only produce data for one physical point at a time
and it cannot be used to analyze fiber suspension flows. Similarly there exist other methods that
use point correlation to measure the surface velocity at a given point.
In order to obtain the surface velocity profile for a section of the forming jet we have developed
a Surface-Pattern Image Velocimeter (SPIV) using cross-correlation methods and wellestablished Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technique. The PIV technique is a particularly
powerful method for making velocity field measurements. This method is, however, limited to
transparent fluids with well defined seed particles. The fiber suspension in the headbox and the
forming section is not transparent and therefore cannot be measured using PIV methods. SPIV
takes advantage of the non-uniform flow patterns on the surface of the forming jet by recording
the positions of distinct flow patterns using a high speed digital camera and application of crosscorrelation techniques between a sequential pair of images to determine the jet velocity profile.
Various optimization methods are used in the calculations to maximize the signal to noise ratio.
20.
The Theoretical Basis of SPIV
The SPIV method is based on the comparison of a pair of sequential images and the tracking of
recognizable non-uniform patterns between the two images of known temporal separation. This
is illustrated in Figure 1 below.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
79
FO05
Status
Report
Find the pattern most closely
Correlating
to this in Image2
<..,,v..+.,.~
.A...,,
K~.:~....QY(L(~,,.:.‘<~
~(-~./,~.‘m~.‘~“‘.‘~:,~,,,~~
..nii,;,n’,,c,,,“+,
‘+%
r%
Figure
1 - Illustration
of the basis of SPIV
21.
The Cross Correlation
Method
Eacj pattern in the image is represented
by
two images, the cross correlation
between
Equation I, below. The displacement
during
for the highest cross correlation value, O(jJ,
an array of gray
the two images,
a time interval is
for each point (i,i)
scale numbers.
To compare the
0((i), is computed
according to
determined
by searching image 2
in image 1.
D&j: Cross correlation value
v(m, n) : value of gray scale of Image 1 (O-255)
u(m,n) : value of gray scale of Image 2 (O-255)
PVPU : Mean value of v(m, n), u(m, n) inside of the inspection box
M,N : Size of inspection box
Without further optimization
of the method, the accuracy would depend
However,
the accuracy is greatly improved
the pixels in the image.
presented in the next section.
22.
Estimation
of the Displacement
at the Sub-pixel
on the physical size of
by Sub-pixel
analysis,
Level
This method has a limitation in resolution since the displacement
pixels. In order to obtain more accurate velocity measurements
the
be improved or some additional filter must be added to the scheme
method overcomes
this limitation and realizes sub-pixel accuracy
is always measured
in whole
resolution of the image must
of the calculation.
The SPIV
in velocity measurement
by
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
80
Project FO05
Status Report
fitting the three points adjacent- to the peak of the correlation distribution function with a
Gaussian profile, as illustrated in Fig. 2. This method is used to reduce the digitization error that
occurs whenever a continuous field is projected onto a discreet domain.
/ Integer coordinate of peak
J
/
Estimated peak location at subpixel level
A
I
I
I
I
X0
I
I
I
i-l
i
i+l
Figure 2 - Gaussian fit to the three points near the peak.
The application of the Gaussian equations, given by
f(x) = Cex
xO
=i+
1nR(i-1,j) - 1nRQ+l,j>
2In Rcisl
,j> - 4In Rti3j>- 2In Rcj+l
>j>
YO
1nR(i,j-1) - In R(i,j+l)
=j+ 21nR(ij 1)-4lnRcij, -2lnR. *
,
,(w+l)(Eq. 2)
(ii,j): integercoordinateof peak
R(i, crosscorrelation value at (i, j)
j):
significantly improves the accuracy of the SPIV method. The range of the error is reduced by
two thirds and the standard deviation of the error is reduced by approximately 80%. This
increases the effective resolution of this technique by a factor of four to five over the resolution
of the basic technique.
The results of these calculations often contain questionable data points that do not appear
correct in relation to their neighbors. These questionable data points are eliminated in order that
the velocity profile should vary continuously in space. The value calculated at each point on the
image is compared to the average value of it’s eight neighbors and is discarded if it deviates
from this average by more that a certain threshold value.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
81
Project FO05
30.
Status Report
Automated SPIV method for On-line analysis
We have implemented the SPIV method in an automated system, as illustrated in Fig. 3,
suitable for use in a mill. This system consists of three components for image acquisition, image
transfer and real time image processing and analysis.
31.
Image Acquisition
The images are acquired using a Kodak high-speed digital video camera connected to a Kodak
Ektapro Model IOOOHRC Motion Analyzer. This system acquires and stores digital video images
as a sequence of numbered eight-bit grayscale Bayer format images at a resolution of 512 by
384. These images may be acquired at a rate of up to 1000 frames per second and stored in the
analyzer’s online memory.
32.
Image Transfer
Currently the images for analysis are transferred using a SCSI optical disk drive as a SCSI
buffer; necessary since SCSI can not be used for direct machine to machine data transfer. A set
of two numbered sequential images is downloaded through the analyzer’s built-in SCSI port and
stored as TIFF files on a 1.3 GB optical disk. The SCSI drive is then reset to refuse interrupts
from the analyzer and the files are read from disk by the image processing system.
33.
Image Processing and Analysis
The actual work of implementing the SPIV method has been programmed as a LabVIEW virtual
instrument (VI) running on a Pentium Ill 500 MHz based Windows 98 notebook computer
equipped with a PCMCIA based slim SCSI interface. The VI controls the analyzer’s functions for
image acquisition, storage and export through the analyzer’s RS-232 compatible serial interface
driven by the notebook’s COMI serial port. The images are acquired from the SCSI buffer
through the PCMCIA slim SCSI card and read directly into the VI. Processing is handled
through a series of sub-Vls and the final data is both saved as a text file for further postprocessing and displayed as a set of charts in near real time.
Currently the system applies the SPIV method to a pair of images and calculates the surface
velocity (in pixels per second) across the frame. It exports this data as a text file for postprocessing including the plotting of vector diagrams to represent the velocity field overlain on
the original image and suitable for animation. This post-processing is done using a custom
Visual BASIC PC program and customized image analysis software on an SGI graphics
workstation to build the animation files. It also calculates the average velocity along lines of
constant CD and MD and plots this data in the VI’s main window as plots of CD averaged
velocity against MD and MD averaged velocity against CD. These plots may be printed or cutand-pasted into a report. They may also be reconstructed in a plotting program from the main
text file for a more detailed analysis. Elapsed time from the initiation of image recording through
the generation of the final plots and export of data is approximately four minutes with default
settings.
The VI allows the inspection box (that is the area of the image used for pattern recognition) to
be adjusted from the default and for MD and CD offsets to be set to allow for imperfectly
centered images. It also has a setting to allow for images with flow running either vertically or
horizontally through the frame. Changing these settings, especially the inspection box size, from
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
82
Project FO05
Status Report
the defaults can significantly alter the time required to process the images as well as affect the
resolution of the velocity plots.
34.
Future Plans
Development of this system is a continuing effort. While all of the first objectives are met there
are plans to greatly enhance the utility of this system. These can be divided into three areas;
ease of use, instantaneous analysis and time dependent analysis.
To improve the ease of use of the system we plan to look into eliminating the need to reset the
SCSI bus through direct machine-to-machine transfer of the TIFF images. While this will not
appreciably affect system performance it will eliminate one step requiring operator intervention
and will remove one piece of equipment from the system.
To the current system allowing instantaneous analysis (that is analysis of a set of two images)
we plan to add features allowing the plotting of velocity along arbitrary lines and to allow the
calculation of FFTs across lines of constant CD.
We also plan to enable the system to deal with a time series of more than two adjacent images.
It will repeat it’s set of calculations between each adjacent image in the set and display the
velocity data as a function of time. This will be more suitable for a post-processing situation as it
will appreciably increase the required processing time.
IPST Surface Pattern Image Velocimitry
PC Running
LabVIEW
System
Highspeed Video Camera
Kodak 1 OODHR C
Analyzer
RS232 Serial
Image Data Link
‘1.3GB Optical Drive
Figure 3. A schematic of the current on-line SPIV system.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
FO05
83
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Publte Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Status Report
84
85
OVERCOMING
THE FUNDAMENTAL
WATER REMOVAL LIMITATIONS
OF CONVENTIONAL
WET PRESSING
STATUS REPORT
FOR
PROJECT
F039
Timothy F. Patterson (PI)
lsaak Rudman
Daniela Edelkind
March 8 - 9,200O
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30318
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
87
F039
Status Report
DUES-FUNDED
Project
PROJECT
Title:
SUMMARY
Overcoming
the Fundamental
Water Removal
Limitations
of
Conventional
Wet Pressing
F039
Papermaking
Project Number:
PAC:
Project Staff
Principal
Investigator:
Co-Investigators:
Research
Support
Staff:
Timothy
Patterson
None
lsaak Rudman,
Daniela
PAC Subcommittee
F. Cunnane
D. Lacz
T. Haller
FY 99-00 Budget:
Allocated
as Matching
$96,000
O/0 0
Funds:
Time Allocation:
Principal
Investigator:
Co-Investigators:
Research
Support
Staff:
Edelkind
20%
O/0
I. Rudman
25%
D.Edelkind50%
Supporting
Research:
Special Students:
None
External (Where Matching
Is Used):
N/A
RESEARCH
LINElROADMAP:
Line #7 - Increase paper machine productivity
by 30%
over 1997 levels via focus on breakthrough
forming, dewatering,
and drying concepts.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE:
Develop through theoretical, experimental
and pilot scale
studies a non-drying,
dewatering technology that will produce sheet solids levels that
equal the theoretical maximum for non-drying methods.
PROJECT
BACKGROUND:
Project was initiated
July I, 1999.
MILESTONES:
Identify and quantify opportunities
for improving wet pressing water removal. (To be
Completed
by March 2000)
Review published literature.
Review unpublished
IPST research from previous DFRC projects.
Identify and prioritize alternative water removal methods and opportunities.
0
Evaluate potential methods at laboratory scale. (Schedule to be determined
in
consultation
with sub-committee
and PAC)
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
88
F039
Status
a
Implement
method.
method(s)
at an appropriate
scale to convincingly
demonstrate
Report
the
DELIVERABLES:
Deliverables
for March 2000
Overall Deliverable - Establish the path forward for the research project.
Literature search directed at understanding
the current limitations on wet
pressing and possible methods for overcoming those limitations. Completed
literature search will be submitted as an IPST Member Report.
Review of previous IPST research, specifically;
l
Member company surveys completed for F021 - use information
to
establish pressing baseline.
l
Steambox (FO02) and Impulse Drying (FOOI) - for permeability
data,
pore size data, compressibility
data.
Use literature and previous IPST research to create a solids profile vs nip
curve pressure profile and solids profile vs press position.
-
Identify
and prioritize
water removal
methods
and opportunities.
STATUS OF GOALS FOR FY 99-00:
. Review the literature and previous IPST research to establish the magnitude
gain that can be obtained by overcoming the current fundamental
limitations
pressing (To be completed by March 2000).
n
of the
on wet
Prioritize, based on potential gain and technical feasibility, the possible methods for
overcoming
current limitations on wet pressing (To be completed by March 2000).
m
In consultation
with the PAC sub-committee
develop an experimental
evaluating potential methods
(To be completed by March 2000).
.
Goals for the remainder
(March 2000).
of the FY99-00
to be decided
at Spring
SCHEDULE:.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
plan for
PAC meeting
Project
89
F039
Status Report
Task Descriptions
1. Literature Survey
2. Write up of Lit Survey
3. Review Prev. IPST
Research
4. Develop Press Solids
Profile
5. Prioritize Potential
Methods
6. Develop Experimental
Plan
7. Setup Experiment
Equip.
8. Perform Experiments
9. Write yearly report
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS:
A literature review directed at understanding
the current limitations on wet pressing
and possible methods for overcoming those limitations was initiated.
Conventional
pressing is not capable of producing sheet solids levels that
approach the theoretical maximum for non-drying methods.
Sheet and fiber
compressibility
limit the maximum sheet solids.
-
Attaining solids levels that approach the theoretical maximum for non-drying
methods will require the use of alternative “driving forces” that are not the
result of the application of mechanical pressure, e.g. conventional
pressing.
A review of the literature, previous IPST research,
for sheet dewatering
yielded several possibilities:
Fiber modification.
Ultrasound application during pressing.
A modified form of displacement
dewatering.
Given the fundamental
greatest potential.
mechanisms
operating,
SUMMARY
OF KEY CONCLUSIONS:
. Conventional
pressing is not capable of producing
the theoretical maximum for non-drying methods.
require the use of alternative “driving forces”.
n
and the potential
displacement
mechanisms
dewatering
has the
sheet solids levels that approach
Overcoming
those limitations will
A modified form of displacement
dewatering
appears to have the greatest potential,
based on the fundamental
mechanisms
operating, for overcoming
the current
limitation on wet pressing water removal.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
90
F039
Status
Report
DISCUSSION:
1.
INTRODUCTION
The start date for this project was July 1999. Between the project start and the present
time, the primary effort was to identify and prioritize potential methods for significantly
enhancing the water removal of wet pressing.
This effort had three parts:
1. A survey of the open
Objective: Determine
1. Where in the
2. What are the
3. What can be
4. What can be
literature.
the following
sheet is the water held during the pressing process?
forces holding the water in the sheet during pressing?
done to reduce the forces holding the water?
done to increase the forces driving water from the sheet?
2. A review of an earlier paper machine
Objective: Determine if
1. Sheet solids vs press section
3.
survey (Project
location
F021)
can be determined.
A review of earlier steambox (FO02) and impulse drying (FOOI)
Objective: Determine the following
1. Can representative
average sheet pore diameters be determined
from
existing water permeability
data?
2. Can average sheet pore diameter be used to determine the capillary forces
in the sheet at various points in the pressing process?
3. Can sheet compression
data, obtained from previous sheet displacement
experiments,
be used to estimate sheet solids vs nip position?
4. Can additional insight into the mechanisms
controlling the press dewatering
process be obtained?
The primary results of the above work were:
1. Press dewatering
is limited by sheet compression
and the resultant decrease pore
spaces. As the sheet compresses
it becomes stiffer limiting further compression.
The decreased
pore size causes increased resistance to water flow.
2. Displacement
dewatering,
employed in a manner that takes advantage
of initial
sheet compression
that occurs in the early part of the pressing process, has the
greatest potential for yielding significantly increased water removal.
3. The paper machine survey data was not sufficient to obtain position in the machine
vs sheet solids correlations.
However, the data did show that many machines
deliver low solids sheets to the dryer section.
4. Using theoretical considerations,
water permeability
data, and sheet displacement
data it is possible to calculate the pneumatic pressure required for displacement
dewatering,
the optimum point in the nip to initiate displacement
dewatering,
sheet
solids vs compression
level, and sheet apparent density vs nip location (up to
maximum comprassion).
Compression
data for the entire pressing process can be
obtained and used to analysis the process.
The work is described
in the following
sections.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
91
F039
Status Report
2. LITERATURE
SURVEY
At the beginning of the project, two different general means of enhancing press
dewatering
were considered.
These were, change th.e sheet/fiber ability to hold water
and increase the forces or use alternative forces to remove water from the sheet/fiber.
Therefore,
a first step was to understand the forces holding the water in the sheet and
the forces acting during standard wet pressing.
The following subject areas were
investigated:
wet pressing theory, wet pressing practice, web compression,
fiber
structure, fiber-water
interaction, web-water
interaction, WRV test, FSP test, rewet,
displacement
dewatering,
and press felts.
While a number of methods were found that could yield incremental
increases in water
removal, i.e., more uniform pressure application,
heating, increased press load,
optimized pressing pulse, longer pressing pulse, and improved felts, only three methods
appeared to have any potential for significantly increasing water removal. These were,
fiber modification
to reduce fiber swelling and water content, application of ultrasound
during pressing, and displacement
dewatering.
In standard wet pressing the amount of water removed from the sheet corresponds
to
the amount of water normally held in the inter-fiber spaces. This does not imply that
only inter-fiber water is removed during wet pressing, earlier research has shown that
intra-fiber water can be removed by wet pressing.
However, if the fiber held less water
the wet pressing process should result in greater solids contents at the end of the
process.
Thus, fiber modification
(reduction in fiber swelling and water content) via the
addition of chemicals to pulp prior to pressing was considered.
There are a few
disadvantages
to this approach.
Previous research indicated that the sheet strength
tended to decrease as a result of treatments to reduce fiber swelling. There were also
some contradictory
results in the literature.
In addition, it appeared that different
treatments
would be required for different furnish types.
Several Russian researchers
studied the use of ultrasound during and prior to the
pressing process. These researchers
filed a number of patents and claimed significant
increases in water removal. The pressing application involved superimposing
an
ultrasound induced force on the standard pressure applied during wet pressing.
A
drawback to this research was that the fundamental
mechanism causing the increased
dewatering
was not identified.
The mechanism
may have been a phenomena
known as
ultra sound induced capillary pressure.
When a capillary is exposed to ultra sound the
capillary pressure is increased.
This could in theory, result in water being forced from
inside the intra-fibers pores or from the inter-fiber pores. However, no mention of this
phenomena
was made by the Russian researchers.
The subject deserves further
investigation
to determine the potential magnitudes
of ultrasound induced capillary
pressure.
However, the lack of a clearly identified fundamental
operating mechanism
made this approach less promising.
The final area was displacement
dewatering.
Several researchers
have done work in
this area. However, most of the work was directed at maintaining
bulk and not at
optimizing water removal.
Based on some preliminary calculations there appeared to be
the potential for potentially significant increases in water removal if displacement
TPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
F039 .
92
Status Report
dewatering
possibility
derivation
derivation
permeability
FOOI.
were employed in the proper manner. There was also the additional
of limiting rewet. The last section of this report presents a theoretical
on how to employ displacement
dewatering in an optimum manner.
This
was developed
by lsaak Rudman, and utilizes the previous literature, water
data from FOOI and FO02, and sheet displacement/compression
data from
A report covering the entire literature search is being written at this time. A section
covering rewet is complete.
The report will be submitted as an IPST Member Report.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
F039
93
Status Report
MACHINE
SURVEY
As part of project F021 a survey of a large number of linerboard, medium, and fine
paper machines was undertaken.
The objective of the survey was to obtain data on the
operation and problems encountered
in the dryer section. The survey included a
number of questions about the operation of the press section. The data on the press
section had not previously been studied.
It was hoped that an analysis of the data
would yield a press section position vs sheet solids relationship.
This relationship
would
potentially help prioritize potential methods of enhancing water removal in the press
section.
A review of the data showed that there was not enough information to produce a
position vs solids correlation.
However, there were some interesting results. The level
of solids at the press section exit was not high for any of the furnishes.
In the case of the fine paper machines (see Table I), no machine produced
44% solids at the press section exit. Also, the sheet temperature
tended to
low, for most machines it was around 38 OC. The low level of solids and the
temperature
were probably the result of constraints on sheet quality and the
limiting of press loading and sheet heating.
In the case of linerboard (see Table 2) the exit
than for the fine paper machines. However, the
for two medium machines.
Sheet temperatures
than those for the fine paper machine, and are
solids levels.
greater than
be rather
low sheet
resultant
press solids tended to be slightly higher
exit solids were all less than 45% except
and press loading tended to be higher
probably the main reason for the higher
While no quantitative
data was derived that could help with the current project, the
results do demonstrate
that there is significant room for improvement
in water removal
on most machines.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
94
F039
4 SUPPORTING
THEORY
FOR DISPLACMENT
Status Report
DEWATERING
The work presented in the following subsections
is an attempt to provide a motivation for
the optimal use of displacement
dewatering
based on fundamental
concepts and
existing experimental
data. The work is not intended to be exhaustive nor complete, but
rather to demonstrate
there is an optimum manner for implementing
displacement
dewatering.
And, that its implementation
can be guided by understanding
the physical
mechanisms
that are at work and by utilizing data from carefully formulated
experiments.
The Mechanism
of Water
Removal
- Limits Imposed
bv Conventional
Pressina.
In conventional
pressing, water removal is induced by compressing
the sheet. Sheet
compression
results in a decrease
in average
pore size and increase
in apparent
density.
These changes decrease sheet compressibility
and as a result decrease the
potential for water removal.
Using peak pressures
of up to 1000 psi, the maximum
solids attainable
in most press sections is 4550%.
This solids level represents
about
the same amount of water as is found in the inter-fiber pores, i.e. inter-fiber water or free
water, (Maloney et al. 1998).
Inter-fiber water is contained in the pore spaces between the fibers, these pores
generally have diameters of 1 micron or greater. Intra-fiber water (or swollen water) is
the water contained in pores that exist in the fibers. These pores generally have
diameters of less than 0.05 microns. The intra-fiber water consists of water that is
bonded to the fiber through hydrogen bonding and water that is not bonded to the fiber
and can be removed mechanically.
The amount of intra-fiber water determines the
Fiber Saturation Point (FSP) and is about 1.4-I 5 g/g (Lindstrom1986).
If only free
water is removed in press section the sheet solids should be 40-42%.
Outgoing solids
on most modern presses is in this range or slightly higher. Some of the latest machines
may produce solids in the range of 50%, however, the quality constraints on many
grades prevent the level of press loading required to attain those solids levels.
Is only inter-fiber water removed in press section? Experiments
indicate that intra-fiber
water is also removed in the nip (Carlsson 1983, Laivins and Scallan 1993). Therefore,
the low solids levels attained in conventional
pressing imply that the water removal
process is not a serial process - all the free water is removed and then the intra-fiber
water is removed.
As the sheet is compressed
some intra-fiber water is pushed into the
inter-fiber spaces and a portion of it may reach the felt. Some of the inter-fiber water
also enters the felt, however some of the inter-fiber water may be absorbed by the
fibers, thus becoming intra-fiber water. This process is beneficial for development
of
sheet strength but at the same time limits water removal by conventional
pressing.
A number of researchers
have studied different approaches
to increasing water removal
in the press section. Peak pressure and nip dwell time can be increased to increase
dewatering
(Busker and Cronin 1982, Pikulik et al. 1996, Springer et al. 1991). The
uniformity of pressure application can be enhanced with improved felts, thus increasing
water removal for many grades (McDonald et al. 1999, Oliver and Wiseman 1978, Sze
1986, Szikla 1991, Vomhoff et al 1997). Also, the pressure pulse can be optimized
(Schiel 1973). While the earlier work did show that improvements
could be made, no
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
95
F039
Status
Report
significant breakthrough
is expected by using conventional
pressing at room
temperatures.
Some researchers
have suggested fiber treatments to decrease fiber
swelling and, therefore the amount of intra-fiber water in the sheet. These treatments
may negatively affect the mechanical strength of paper (Swerin et al. 1990, Strom and
Kunnas 1991).
Limit of Water
Removal
bv Mechanical
Means
A portion of intra-fiber water (about 0.4 g/g) forms hydrogen bonds with the fibers and is
contained in the fiber wall in pores smaller than 25 A (or 0.0025 microns) (Stone et al.
1966). This water is sometimes
referred to as non-freezing
water. The amount of
hydrogen bonded water varies insignificantly
for different pulps. The amount of this
water is affected by neither beating, nor drying. It does not depend on the sheet
treatment.
This water cannot be removed mechanically,
as its removal requires heating
to break the hydrogen bonds. It constitutes the limit of water removal by mechanical
means and represents a sheet solids content of l/(1 + moisture ratio)) =I/(1 +0.4) =
0.71. Thus, it appears that there is a significant potential to increase water removal from
the present level of outgoing solids (40-45%) to magnitudes
that are closer to the
maximum limit on mechanical water removal, about 70% of solids.
Alternative
Water Removal
Methods.
Most alternative water removal methods rely on applying a pneumatic pressure
differential to the sheet and on minimizing sheet compression.
Earlier techniques
associated with this concept involve displacement
dewatering
(Sprague 1986, Lindsay
1991), capillary dewatering
(Chuang et al. 1997, Lee 1995) and blow-through
dewatering
(Kawka 1979). In the case of displacement
dewatering
the applied pressure
differential acts against the capillary pressure resistance and drives the water out of the
sheet. Capillary dewatering
counteracts
the sheet capillary pressure with a larger
imposed capillary pressure.
Blow through dewatering
depends on water evaporation
and water entrainment.
All three methods minimize sheet compression
in the nip to
keep more pores open and increase the water removal rate.
Pore size determines
capillary pressure to be overcome by the driving pressure used to
induce water removal. Pore size decreases with sheet compression.
Thus, more
efficient water removal can be expected if the sheet is not significantly compacted
during application of driving pressure differential.
In general, the pores of interest for all
three methods are the inter-fiber pores. The intra-fiber pores are extremely small and
result in correspondingly
high capillary pressures, pressures that would be difficult to
produce and maintain.
Displacement
Dewatering
Concept.
Displacement
dewatering
involves sheet prepressing and subsequent
application of a
driving air pressure. If displacement
dewatering
is to be efficient, it is necessary to
determine the optimal combination
of compressive
and driving air pressure. Application
of the proper compressive
pressure ensures that the sheet is in saturated condition and
serves to move some of the water in the sheet from intra-fiber pore spaces to inter-fiber
pore spaces. Maintaining the sheet in a saturated condition can reduce the occurrence
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
96
F039
Status Report
of fingering.
Fingering results when there are small areas in the sheet that present less
resistance to water flow than the remainder of the sheet. Given an equal pneumatic
pressure applied to the sheet and the inter-fiber water, the water will follow these “paths
of least resistance” quickly creating a path through the sheet that is not blocked by
water. The driving air then flows through those paths creating fingering and localized
blow through.
The problem is the pneumatic pressure on the remainder of the sheet is
relieved, stopping the water removal, and significant amounts of air can escape.
If all
the paths through the sheet were comprised of equal diameter pores, pores producing
the same level of capillary pressure, there would be no fingering and blow through.
Elimination of blow fingering can be also achieved by applying foam it the sheet surface
(Skelton 1987). As the compressive
pressure increases, the size of the pores available
for water flow decreases, the capillary pressure resistance increases and the driving
pneumatic
pressure must increase.
Inter-fiber water and intra-fiber water are held by capillary forces. This water can be
removed mechanically
when and applied pneumatic,
P, exceeds the capillary resistance
which is given by
P = 2 y cos 8 / r,
where y is surface tension of water (at room temperature
y = 0.073 N/m); r is average
pore radius; and 0 is the contact angle, usually varying within the range from 0 to 60
degrees (Hodgson and Berg 1988). Thus capillary pressure resistance depends on the
wetting fluid, which determines
surface tension and contact angle, and on average pore
size. Effective use of displacement
dewatering requires that approaches
be found to
determine necessary compressive
and driving pressures in terms of their magnitudes
and time distribution
in the nip.
Role of Water
Permeability
for Determining
Pore Size.
There is an experimentally
observed and theoretically
substantiated
link between
permeability
and average pore size ( Bliesner 1964, Dullien 1986, Hoyland and Field
1976). This link makes it possible to obtain an estimate of average pore size and
capillary pressure resistance using the water permeability test (Appendix 1). Thus,
required driving pressure can then be calculated.
An analysis of the available water permeability measurements
conducted at IPST over
the years was made. These measurements
were routinely performed to estimate
specific surface area of the water swollen fibers in the sheet, a measure thought to be
correlated with critical temperature
of impulse drying. No research specifically targeting
effect of the applied pressure within the range encountered
in the press nip (up to 500 1000 psi) was conducted
using the water permeability test. However, tests were
conducted at lesser applied pressures and the data is valuable to the current research.
A summary of the available water permeability
results is presented in Table 3. It
indicates that at high applied pressures the pore size for the sheets, made from different
furnishes, converges to approximately
the same value regardless of their basis weights
and permeabilities
in uncompressed
state. The coefficient of variation of average pore
IPST Confidential Information -Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
97
F039
Status Report
size decreases as the applied pressures increases from 10 to 1000 psi and then levels
. off (Figure 1). The average pore size in highly-compressed
sheets is about 36 A, which
is close to the pore size in which hydrogen-bonded
water is contained (about 25 A). This
water cannot be removed mechanically
and determines the limit of pressing.
During the water permeability test, the overall sheet compression
is measured by
monitoring the separation of the press platens. Using this information,
sheet
compressibility
results can be measured which enables a calculation sheet elastic
modulus as a function of the sheet strain, or apparent density as a function of applied
pressure. While the compression
process used in the sheet is not identical to that
encountered
in the press nip. this information can be used to estimate sheet
compression
in the nip. Also the development
of the solids as a function of compressive
pressure can be described.
Role of Thickness
Measurements
in the Nip
A system developed to measurement
the displacement
of metal targets, placed on and
within sheets, was used from April to June 1997 for an investigation
of sheet
compression
and expansion during conventional
pressing and impulse drying. A
schematic
is shown in Appendix 1. The system was used in conjunction with an MTS
computer controlled hydraulic press. Various furnishes and impulses were tested, all
tests used a felt to ensure the compression
process was as realistic as possible.
Some
of the results obtained with this system were reported by Orloff et al. 1998, Table 4
shows the test conditions.
Displacement
measurement
system, in general, worked well within certain limitations.
The system used eddy current sensors to measure the displacement
of the metal
targets. Due to the errors inherent to this measurement
method, reliable data could not
be obtained from low thin sheets. The minimum sheet thickness for repeatable data was
100 - 150 microns. Thus, sheets or layers within a sheet that had basis weights less
than 100 gsm had poor reproducibility.
In addition, if the sheet layers were made from
sheets of different basis weights cause the prepressing sample preparation
process to
produce a non-uniform
sheet density profile.
Figure 2 shows parameters
that can be calculated using the displacement
measurements.
The case shown used a shoe press impulse. Sheet strain,
function of dwell time, was calculated as follows:
as a
A&(t) = [Lo - L(t)] / Lo
where Lo is initial (ingoing) thickness of the sheet; L(t) is the sheet thickness at a given
time, t of the nip. The corresponding
compression
rate is dldt.
Analysis of the pressure and compression
rate curves makes it possible to single out
four intervals within the nip which were qualitatively outlined in some publications
associated with fundamentals
of wet pressing (Carlsson 1983, Wahlstrom
1969, Wrist
1964). The first three intervals characterize
the compressive
phase of the nip, while the
last characterizes
the expansion phase of the nip. A more detailed description
of the
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
pressure
below.
98
F039
nip intervals
is presented
in Appendix
Status Report
2. Some other results are described
The MTS presses the sheet under dynamic conditions.
The water permeability
test
apparatus presses the sheet under static, saturated sheet conditions.
It is generally
acknowledged
that static pressing produces higher solids levels than dynamic pressing.
Results from the two pieces of equipment can be used to compare sheet compression
and solids during static and dynamic pressing. The development
of the solids under
static and dynamic pressing conditions is presented in Figure 3. It demonstrates
the
significant difference in outgoing solids attained by static and dynamic compression.
An
increase of platen temperature
makes it possible to diminish this difference.
Using the plot of sheet thickness as a function of time it is possible to determine the
time and amount applied pressure which brings the sheet to a saturated state. Once the
sheet is completely saturated, significant water removal can begin. This pressure can
be considered as the minimum pressure required to avoid the fingering effect during
displacement
dewatering.
Reaching this pressure can be thought of as a pre-pressing
for displacement
dewatering.
The maximum of pre-pressing
pressure is determined
by
the point at which the compression
rate becomes small. After this point, water removal
by sheet compression
is not efficient and displacement
dewatering
by pneumatic
pressure should be least susceptible to fingering and have the greatest potential for
dewatering.
The average pore size will dictate the magnitude
of pneumatic pressure
required.
A point in favor of delaying the application of displacement
dewatering
until
the this point is that as the sheet is compressed
the pore size distribution decreases,
thus further reducing the potential for fingering.
Estimate
of Water
Removal
in the Nip
To determine the optimum relationship between pre-pressing
and driving pressure in
displacement
dewatering,
an estimate of water removal with respect to nip position
should be made. Th.is would also allow a comparison of water removal in displacement
dewatering
and in conventional
pressing.
A theoretical derivation is presented in the
following paragraphs.
Within the limits of the assumptions
made in the derivation, the
result can serve as a guide for determining
the point at which to initiate displacement
dewatering.
The velocity of the water flow during pressing is determined
by the sheet compression
rate. Since the area available for water flow in any cross section is the area not
occupied by the fibers, the absolute velocity of water inside the sheet is given by the
expression:
U = (dL/dt) I (l-v c ),
where v is the specific
density of the sheet.
The velocity
volume
of swollen
of the water relative
fibers and c = m, / (A L) is the apparent
to the fiber network
is
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
99
F039
Status
Report
U, = (dLldt) / (1 -v c ) - dL/dt
= (dLldt) {v c / (I- v c )} .
In the case of laminar flow, according to Poiseuille’s Law, viscous resistance
compression-induced
water flow through the fiber network can be expressed
to the
as
P, = 8 L p U,-/ R* ,
where p is the dynamic
pores for water flow.
viscosity
Since R can be expressed
of water and R is the average
hydraulic
radius of the
as
R2=8K/&
=8Kl(l-vc),
where K is the permeability
rewritten as
for water flow, the equation
for viscous
resistance
can be
P v = L~U,E/K
Using the relationship
for Ur the expression
for the viscous
resistance
becomes
P, = L dL/dt p v c / K.
It is important to note that although no pressure differential is applied to the sheet in the
nip, the resistance to compression-induced
water flow is the same as for Darcian flow.
where
L=Wlc,
and W is the oven-dry
differentiating
yields,
basis weight.
Substituting
the Darcian
expression
L and
P, = (- p W* v) (dcldt)l (c* K).
Water permeability
K can be found as a function of apparent
analysis of experimental
data and the relationship
density
using regression
K = k, c k2.
The viscous resistance in the sheet is balanced by the portion of applied pressure
equal to P - P,, where P is the total applied pressure and P, is the pressure
compressing
the fibers. Thus, P, can be stated as
P” = P - P,
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
that is
Project
100
F039
where P, is the compression
. apparent density (Ingmanson
Status Report
pressure which is usually found
et al. 1959, Wrist 1964)
as a power function
of
P, = p, c p2.
Finally, an equation for the calculation of apparent density as a function of the nip
position at which water flow out of the sheet begins is obtained by combining the
expressions
for P, and P,
(PI c p2 - p W* v) (dcldt)l (c* k, c k2) = P.
Nilsson and Larsson (1968) concluded that measurements
of flow resistance and
compressibility
do not give enough quantitative
information to estimate water removal in
the nip after the point of maximum compression.
The relationship is suitable for
estimates of water removal prior to that point. Additionally,
time-dependent
functions can
be used if required (Wrist 1964).
The solution of this equation can be easily found by coding it in an Excel Spreadsheet.
As estimate indicate, the assumption
about sheet saturation results in marginal error at
high compressive
pressures, because the volume occupied by compressed
air is
negligible.
A sample calculation, for portion of compressive
takes place, was performed for a sheet pressed
parameters
were used:
phase of the nip where water removal
at room temperature.
The following
k, = 0.01 x IO-“’ m* / (g/cm3);
k 2 = -4.463
p, = 2.75 MPa / (g/cm”);
p* = 3.175;
Jo = 0.00995 (dynes/sq.cm)
set;
W= 0.01874 g/cm*
v = 1.03 cm3/g.
The result is plotted in Figure 3. This example calculation illustrates that the suggested
approach produces a reasonable
match of experimental
and calculated results.
Conclusions.
An analysis of the amount water held in the inter- and intra-fiber of a wet sheet,
indicates that there is an opportunity to increase water removal in the press from the
current level of about 45% of solids to the levels approaching
70% of solids. The main
factor which impedes attaining higher levels of solids during conventional
pressing is the
extent of sheet compression
required.
The compression
is attained through high press
loads. Compression
of the sheet reduces the average inter-fiber pore size and restricts
water flow. Thus, to achieve higher solids, water removal should not be accompanied
by excessive compression
of the wet web, which in turn requires an alternative driving
force for removing the water.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
F039
101
Status Report
Displacement
dewatering
in the press section appears to be promising method for
attaining higher water removal.
Displacement
dewatering
involves sheet prepressing
and subsequent
application of a driving pneumatic pressure.
Optimum displacement
dewatering
requires pre-pressing
that saturates the sheet, removes some water from
the fibers, but does not “excessively”
compress the sheet. It then requires the
application of the pneumatic driving force at the point in the nip when the compression
rate is low, but not negative.
The experimentally
observed and theoretically
substantiated
link between permeability
and average pore size makes it possible to use water permeability
test for an estimate
of average pore size and capillary pressure resistance. Thus, the required pneumatic
driving pressure can be calculated.
Additionally,
an analysis of the available water permeability measurements
shows that at
high applied pressures the average pore size for sheets made from different furnishes
converges to approximately
the same value regardless of basis weights and
permeabilities
in uncompressed
state. The amount of water contained in the pores at
this convergent
condition is approximately
to the amount of water held by hydrogen
bonds. This water cannot be removed mechanically
and determines
the limit of
pressing.
The convergence
of permeabilities
to approximately
the same value at high
applied pressures also supports the observation that the limit of water removal by
pressing is independent
of permeability
in the uncompressed
state.
Dynamic measurements
of the sheet thickness in the nip make it possible to determine
the time and value of applied pressure which brings the sheet into a saturated state and
the time and applied pressure that initiate significant water removal due to compression.
This pressure can be considered as a minimum pre-pressing
pressure for avoiding the
fingering effect that can occur during displacement
dewatering.
The maximum prepressing pressure is determined
at which the compression
rate becomes small. After
this instant of time, water removal by sheet compression
is not efficient and
displacement
dewatering
provides an alternative driving force for dewatering.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Table
1. Fine
Paper
Machines
Operation
Basis
weight
(g/m*)
i
i
i;
i
1
i Speed
;
i
;
:
i
ii
Speed
i
i
;
;
i
;
i
’:
;
i
i1
i
;
;i
Press 1 Press 1 Number
Exit
i
Exit
;
of
i
i (m/min) I Solids I Temp i Presses f Former
Machine
i
i
i
i
i
i
:i
weight less than 50 gsm
=ine Paper
r
I
------------c------------r--‘--“”””’------------~------------*----------.~-~~~~--~~~~-----.
-Basis
47
45
: 2200
I
671
;
39.1
i
95
f
2
.-~~~~~--~~~~~~~--.
- ------------i------------~------------~-------------~------------~----------29
49
i 1401 I
427
i
38
90
i
2
.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,---------C------------,----------G-----------i ------------,----------49
1500 i
457
36
i
:
2
.-----------------.-------------~------------i
32
f
------------c------------c-------------,----------f
i
Average
48
f 1700 ;
518
i
38
i
93
f
2
i
Std. Dev.
2
t
436
I
133
j
2
f
4
1
0
t
i
i
i:
i
ii
i:
i:
;
;
i.
i.
:
i
I
i
Basis weight less than 70 gsm and greater than 50 gsm i
::
Fine Paper
.--____--_____--_-._____________C_______19
55
! 2644----?------------r------------r--------------.
:
806
;
43
i
120
‘------------‘.-------------i
3
: top wire
------------~-------------~------------~------------~-------------.-----------------.-------------c------------t
I
1st Press
;
i
;
i
i;
;
Press 1
i Bottom
Load
i Top Felt f
Felt
i (l=yes)
(Mpa) !. (l=yes)
1
f
:
i
i:
------------i------------~-------------.
::
yes
i
0
------------i------------‘--------------.
1.31
i
-i
Yes
------------~-------“““““““““”
1.03
:
-:
------------i------------i--------------. Yes
1.17
j
i
0.19
;
;i
i
i
i
i:
i
:
i
;
------------t------------“---------------.-------------2.76
i
yes
i
0
------------+------------~-----------’
Basis weight less than 100 gsm and greater than 80 gsm
:ine Paper
-----------------..------------.r------------i------------~~-------------~------------~
“““““““““““““““‘c----------r------------.----1
83
: 2403
i
733
“““‘r”“““““c”“““““l”“”
:
42.5
:
98
:
3
37
88
910
i
277
I
41
i
-----------------.-------------:-----------i
~““‘4i’s””
“------------‘-----------r-----2-----?-ib;;;dri;;ier’
-------------t-----------33
90
i 1569
f
36
I
loo
1 *go
i
0
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,-~------------,----------~-~~~~--------~~--~~~~~~-~~-,~~-~--------~--------------.““‘------“,””--------~-------------’
20
93
’ 2100
f
640
f
43
f
112
f
3
i fourdrinier
3.10
1 yes
Average
90
; 1526
i
465
i
40
f
109
f
2
*i
2.24
i
Std. Dev.
2
!
596
i
182
!
4
i
8
f
1
i
0.75
i
f----y-;;---i
:i
:
i
0
Press
Load
(Mpa)
I
I
I
I
:
1 Top Felt
! (l=yes)
:
;
;
f:
1 Bottom
f
Felt
i (l=yes)
i
4th Press
,
:
I
I
I
:
1 Top Felt
1 (l=yes)
I
::
i
ii
;
i
:i
f Bottom
Press
1 Bottom
f
Felt
Load
I Felt
1 (l=yes)
I (l=yes)
(Mpa)
:
:
i
1
::
ii
::
:t
i
.i
--------------,------------*------------.
-------------~------------+-----------,------------~------------9-------------fI
-i
Yes
-0
;
-I
-BBswwBsss-----------------i-------------.
wwmmmmwB----““““““~“““““”
I------------i------------~---------2.41
yes
i
--()
;
-f
---------------1------------G---------------.
-------------~------------f---------------.------------‘----------‘-“---------------2.76
I
yes
i
--:
-i
-0
;
-f
---------------i------------a--------------.-------------i------------------‘---------.
------------i------------~---------2.58
;
i:
0.00
;
i
0.00
;
i
i
i
0.24
1
i
0.00
1
0.00
1
i
i
;.
:
i
:
i
:
i
:
:i
I:
ii
:i
II
i
: ------------~G------------.
::
:-----i
::
---J-----------..
’ w---s--s---- f ------------ic---------3.93
t
yes
i
-2yi’4””
_‘-““’ f
yes
1
-i
---------------.------------i--------------.
-------------~------------*------------I
------------~------------*---------3.10
-f
yes
--1
-~~~~~~~~-~--~
1““““““‘~““‘“““‘I~~~~~~~~---1‘---‘-‘-‘-“‘.“““““’
:
-;
--I
-;
--------------‘------------f-“--‘-’-”’
I------------:------------9----------:
-:
--I
-i.
--------------i------------~------------.------------i------------~----------i
---i
--------------~-------------ic-------------.------------~-------------i-----------I
:
;.
:
--------------~------------i--------------.
--------------t------------G--------------.
0.15
;
yes
i
0
3.10
:
yes
i
0 B-m- .
---------------i-----------<-s-s-s-M
2.41
;
yes
i
0
--------------,------------~------------.
5.51
i
yes
f
0
:
3.68
1
i
i
1.63
I
:
Press
Load
(Mpa)
3rd Press
I
I
i:
i
1 Top Felt
i (l=yes)
I
-------------~-------------~------------,
-i
-------------~-------------i------------j ------------+---------;
-ss--m---m---- 1------------i------------.------------:
---4.31
:
i
--l
-““““““‘:““““““f”“““““’ yes
------------:------------“-------------i
4.14
yes
i
---i
;
:
-------------,------------~------------.------------,------------i------------------------,------------$-------------,------------J------------~---------4.14
I
yes
I
-4.47
I
-i
0.00
1
0.00
1
i
1
i
i
i
i
0*0°
II
0*0°
i
:i
:
i
f
i:
i
I
:
5.17
0.00
0.00
1
I
i
0
!
i
;
i
yes
------------,------------*----------.
-i
0
f
0.00
1
i
i
0.00
i
i
---
--yes
0
Table
2. Linerboard
and Medium
Machine
Operation
I
Basis
Weight
(g/m*)
Machine
I
; Speed
1 (mlmin)
I
!
1st Press
:
:
:
i
i
i
:
i Press 1
i
IPress Exit!
Exit
f Number of !
!
j Solids
fTemp (F)!
Presses
::
:I
i
i
2nd Press
3rd Press
I
I
Press
Load
(Mpa)
Former
I
1
1 Top Felt
1 (l=yes)
I
I
i
f Bottom
I
Felt
f (l=yes)
:
I
Press
Load
(Mpa)
:
1
1 Top Felt
; (l=yes)
I
Bottom
Felt
(l=yes)
Press
Load
(Mpa)
i
1Pre Dryer
i (l=yes)
::
1
1
I
!
1.
Top Felt 1Bottom Felt! I
(l=yes)
i (l=yes)
I
i
i
Pre Dryer
(l=yes)
--~~~~~~~~.
I~~---~~~~~~---~---.
17
t -----------~-------------~------------,-----------~----------------~---------------If-x
.-. ! -71n.- .i A!?-- .f 175
.-- .i
3
i. Fmrdrinier
1
3 4!i
I
Shoe
Press
,-----------.
3rd Press
,-----------.
‘2nd
Press
,-----------.
I
78
I
769
i
693
i
43
I
145
I
2
i Fourdrinier
i
140
i
3
; Fourdrinier
16
269
t
520
1
ii
-------------------------------+-------------r------------J-----------~----------------~----------------.
f
149
1
2
f Fourdrinier
24
298
I
76
f
42
--____---___---________________
+-------------r------------~----------~----------------~----------------.
i
136
‘i
2
Average
208
I
557
f
41
:I!
:
1
Std. Dev.
62
1
215
1.
3
1
12,
f
i
.
i
:I
.i
I8I
:
i
;
Bleacehed Linerboard
I
I ------------~-----------,------------------~---------------~
i
.
---‘-““““““‘T’-----------~--------~---~~
205
: -------------c------------4------------427
i
37
i
-i ----------------.----------------.-----------3
: Fourdrinier
15
--~~-~~~~~~----~-~-----.j@---f277
i
46
j
109
1
2
1 Fourdrinier
21
--------------------------------*--------------~------------~-----------~----------------~----------------:
247
1
352
i
42
1 109
i
3
Average
i
i
:
i
i
Std. Dev.
I
1
;
i
:
I
i
.i
t
I
:
i
’
i
Medium
i
I
-----~~~~~~~~~-~~~~""1'3'i""T
-*-- kmGk ----- f ------------i-----------r----------”------~----------------.
45
i
17
135
i
2i Fourdrinier
-~~~~~----~~-~~-------MB---w
I
11
It
137
.-.
,L-,-----------~---“--------!------------~----------------~---------------I.
763
--:
A7
.I
IRrl
. -I
7
: Fmmhinier
-----I
WV
---
-
---_--_-_-------_---___________
Std. Div.
1
14
I1
---------------‘------------i-----------i-----------------,----------------.------------1-----------i------------------------t
98
f
2
i
8
f
0
!
:.
:.
:
-_
1
1 37.91
I ------------~------------~-----------1
1
f
-1-~~~~~~~~~-~
i ------------~---------------;-----------------9.30
1
1
f
1
4.14
t
1
i
1
5.51
;
f
1
i
-8.27
f-1---------------i----------------1
i
------------~:----------------------~------------i------------------------+------------r-----------c-----------I.45
1 ““““““f”‘-“‘““‘il”“-““’-1
1
1
--I
-1---------------r,,,,,,,,,,,,,,--.
-1
1.45
I
-f
1
~~~~-~~~~~~~
.L-m.---m.--..------------J,------------~----------------------I.
I
f.
!
4.9
I
10.1
1
18.8
1
!!
1
1
I
!
3.0
i
19.5
I
i
;
j
i
1
12*0
f
II
1
I
I
.
.I
I
I
I
:
i
I
i
I
------------‘------------t-------------------------+--..--------1~~~~~~~--~--i ~~~~~~-~~~~1.90 1BBS--------f -----_____-_--__________
1
1.90
1------‘-““f”““‘““‘,“““““”
-j
1
1
7
2.41 -j-j
1
i
-2.41
;
-i
1
““““““‘“““‘““‘t”“““““’
-----------+-------““‘t”““““““----------.
i
2.2
1
2.2
1
I
f
i
:
I
I
I
i
!
f
I
.
:
i
i
:
I
I
f
!
i
:
I
I
I
:
;
1
1
:
I
I
I
I
------------,------------i-------------------------~
------------i------------i------------““““““~
------------i---------------~-----------------!
1
-I
6.89
I
1
!
1
8.27
I
1
I
1
i
-f
------------J------------i-414
--II
:-
1
:.
1
14.1
i
I.
I
I
i:.
I2nd Press1
I
I
Table 3. Average
Pore Size Based on Permeability
Measurements
1.2569
0.0773
6
7
8
I
I
I
1.0480
O.OlO6
1
0.6445
0.0047
I
05233
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
0.0018
n
0.4871
n
I
Project
105
F039
Status Report
Conditions
for Displacement
Measurements
Condition 1 Condition 2
Conventional
Shoe Press.
Pressing
Peak pressure, MPa
4.82
5.39
Pressure impulse,
37.9 - 41.3
117.2
kPa s
Dwell Time, ms
19-20
46 - 47
Ramp Duration, ms
0
0
Table
4. Experimental
I
Furnish
Press Platen
Temperatures,
“C
Ingoing Solids, %
Layering, gsm
Repulped Liner
30% occ
660 ml CSF
21
200
250
Repulped Liner
30% occ
660 ml CSF
21
100
200
300
35
51, 51, 51, 51
35
51, 51,51,51
IPST Confidential Information -Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Condition 3
Shoe Press WI
Ramp
5.55
137.8-151.6
40
15 runs 4,5
26 runs I,2
43 runs 3
occ
620 ml CSF
275
250
300
325
350
40
15, 30, 30, 30, 100
Project
106
F039
Status Report
a>
.->
cn
co
a,
k
E
0
0
ch
>
s
.-0
.-5
4-i
t5
>
5
5.c)
;.
I
d
z
SUOJ31UJ
d
‘JaJauwa. aJod aBwayf
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
107
F039
Figure 2. Displacement
Status Report
Results for MTS Pressing at Room
Temperature
Compression
Rate = -dL/dt
Strain = ( Lo- L) / Lo
800 -
0.95
-Pressure
-
09.
Comp Rate
I I Strain
A
0.85
08.
Thickness
0.75
E
E
550
07.
f
500 --
0.65
$
450 ---
06.
.-5
400
0.55
--
05.
0.45
04.
0.35
03.
0.25
02.
0.15
01.
_--
-_
5
-200 -c
0
0.02
0
I
II
0.04
0.06
Nip Time, set
0.05
0.08
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
1 -0.05
01.
E
E
Figure 3. Compressive Pressure vs. Solids from Water Permeability (Static Data) and
Sheet Displacement Measurements (Dynamic Data)
-131
gsm / 1.8 mA2/g
--r---435 gsm / 92 m*2/g
- h= 79 gsm / 5.4 mA2/g
* - -210 gsm / 9.7 m*2/g
187.4 gsm.! 21 degrees C
189.5 gsm /IO0 degrees C
06.
Solids
07
l
08
.
09
.
1
109
Project F039
Status Report
Figure 4. Experimental
and Calculated Apparent Densities
800
08.
Applied Pressure
700
600
06.
500
0
c)
&
.-s
co
04. n5
05.
400
300
200
100
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Nip Time, s
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
01.
Project
110
F039
LITERATURE
Status Report
CITED
Bliesner, W.C. A Study of the Porous
Techniques.
Tappi J., 47(7): 392-400
Structure of Fibrous
(July, 1964).
Burns, J.R., Conners, T.E., and Lindsay, J.D. Dynamic
development
during wet pressing. Tappi J., 73(4):107-l
Sheets
Using Permeability
measurement
13( 1990)
of density-gradient
Burton, S.W., and Sprague, C.H. The instantaneous
Measurement
of Density Profile
Development
During Web Consolidation.
Journal of Pulp and Paper Science:Vol.l3,
No.5 September
1987.
Busker, L.H. and Cronin, D.C. The Relative Importance
Removal. 1982 Int. Water Removal Symp., 25-34.
Carlsson, G. Some fundamental
Stockholm,
1983.
aspects
of the wet pressing
Chuang, S., Kaufman, K., Schlesser, R. Capillary
U.S. pat. 5,701,682.
Issued December 30, 1997.
Dullien,
F.A.L. Porous
Media:
of Wet Press Variables
Fluid Transport
Dewatering
of paper.
Method
in Water
Doctoral
Thesis,
and Apparatus.
and Porous Structure.
Hodgson, K.T. and Berg, J.C. Dynamic Wettability Properties of Single Wood Pulp
Fibers and Their Relationship to Absorbency.
Wood and Fiber Science, Vol.20 (I), 3-17,
January, 1988.
Hoyland, R.W, and Field, R. A review of transudation
of water into paper - in five parts.
Part 3. Some principles of flow & their application to paper. Paper Techn. and Industry,
December
1976, 291-299.
Ingielewicz,
H; Kawka,
DRYING OF POROUS
1979).
W. INVESTIGATION
ON INTENSIVE
DEWATERING
PAPERS. Paper (London) 191, no. 10: 618, 621-622
AND
(May 21,
Ingmanson,
W.L., Andrews, B.D., and Johnson, R.C. Internal Pressure Distribution
in
Compressible
Mats under Fluid Stress. TAPPI, Vol.42, #IO, 840-849, October 1959.
Kawka, W., Szwarcsztajn,
E. SOME RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS
ON THE
EQUIPMENT
FOR INTENSIVE DEWATERING
AND DRYING OF POROUS PAPERS.
EUCEPA Conf. (London) 18, Paper No. 31: 17 p. (May 21-24, 1979).
Laivins, G.V. and Scallan, A.M. Removal of Water from Pulps by Pressing - Part 1:
Inter and lntra Wall Water. Tappi Eng.Conf, 1993, Orlando, Florida: 741 L 748.
Lee, C. A. Method
August 29, 1995.
for Dewatering
a Porous
Wet Web. U.S. pat. 5,445,746.
IPST Confidential Information -Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Issued
Project
111
F039
Lindsay, J.D. Displacement
242, 1992.
dewatering
Status Report
to maintain
bulk. Paperi ja Puu, Vol.74,
Lindstrom, T. The Concept and Measurement
of Fiber Swelling. Pp.7597
edited by Bristow, J.A. and Kolseth, P. “Paper Structure and Properties”,
#3, 232.
in monograph
1986.
Maloney, T.C., Todorovic, A., and Paulapuro, H. The effect of fiber swelling
dewatering.
Nordic Pulp and Paper Res. J., Vol.33, #4, 1998, 285291.
on press
McDonald, J.D., Pikulik, I.I., Ko, P.L., and Owston, T.H. Optimizing Market Pulp Felt
Design for Water Removal. 85th Annual Meeting, PAPTAC, Jan.28,29,
1999, A243A250.
Nilsson, P. and Larsson, K.O. Paper Web Performance
of Canada, December 20, 1968: 68 - 73.
Oliver, J.F. and Wiseman,
Roughness.
Transactions
Orloff, D., Rislakki,
Commercialization.
in the Nip. Pulp and Paper Mag.
N. Water Removal in Wet Pressing: The Effect of Felt
of the Technical Section, TRI 04.TRI 09, December 1978.
M., Rudman, I. impulse Drying of Board Grades: Status of
IPST Technical Paper Series, #715, April, 1998, 8p.
Pikulik, I.I., McDonald,
Proc., 735-740.
J.D., and Gilbert,
D. Pressing
of Market
Schiel, C. Optimizing the Nip Geometry of Transversal-Flow
Mag. of Canada, March 7, 1969, 73-78.
Skelton, J. Foam-Assisted
Dewatering - New Technology
28, no. 2: 431, 434-436 (March 1987).
Sprague, C.H. New Concepts
Paper Chemistry.
in Wet Pressing.
Pulp. 1996 Eng. Conf.
Presses.
Emerges.
Final Report.
March,
Pulp and Paper
Paper Technol.
1986. Institute
Ind.
of
Springer, A., Nabors, L.A., and Bhatya, 0. The influence of fiber, sheet structural
properties, and chemical additives on wet pressing. Tappi J., 221-228, April 1991.
Stone, J. E.; Scallan, A.M.; Aberson, G.M.A.; The Wall Density
Fibres; Pulp and Ppr. Mag. Can. T263-T268
(May 1966)
of Native Cellulose
Strom, G.; Kunnas, A. Effect of Cationic Polymers on the Water Retention
Various Pulps. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 6, no. 1: 12-19 (April 1991).
Value of
Swerin, A.; Lindstrom, T.; Odberg, L.; Deswelling of Hardwood Kraft Pulp Fibers by
Cationic Polymers: Effect on Wet-Pressing
and Sheet Properties;
Nord. Pulp Pap. Res.
J. 5, no. 4: 188-196 (Dec. 1990).
Sze, D. Measuring wet press felt pressure
Tappi J., April 1986, 120-I 24.
uniformity
and its effects on sheet solids.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
112
F039
. Szikla, Z. Role of felt in wet pressing.
Paperi ja Puu, 73 (1991):2,
Status Report
160-168.
Vomhoff, H., Norman, B. Model Experiments
on Wet-Pressing-the
Influence of FeltSurface Structure; Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal 1, no. 12: 54-60 (March
1997).
Wahlstrom,
PRESSING.
P. B. OUR PRESENT UNDERSTANDING
OF THE FUNDAMENTALS
Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 70, no. 19: 76-96 [T349-691 (Oct. 3, 1969).
Wrist, P.E. The Present State of Our Knowledge of the Fundamentals
Pulp and Paper Mag. of Canada, T284-T296,
July 1964.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
OF
of Wet Pressing.
Project
113
F039
APPENDIX
1 - Water Permeability,
Average
Status
Pore Size, and Capillary
Report
Pressure
In conventional
wet pressing, the applied pressure drives water from the sheet by
compression.
Sheet compression
results in a less compressible
mat and a decrease in
average pore size. Thus, pore diameter in the compressed
state is a factor controlling
dewatering.
Average pore diameter can be evaluated based on an analogy between
laminar flow in a channel and Darcian flow in the porous medium (Dullien 1986, Hoyland
and Field, 1976).
The expression
for driving
pressure
in a circular channel
is:
AP = U p L / (2 D,*/64).
The Darcy equation
for driving
pressure is:
AP=U
pL/K.
Setting the two equations for AP equal to one another
permeability
to hydraulic diameter of the pores
yields an expression
which
relates
K = D,*/32.
An expression,
derived from by alternative means, that links permeability
for a bundle of parallel capillaries is essentially the same
K=E
and pore size
D,*/32,
where E is porosity indicating volume of the mat available for water flow. This equation
can be also obtained from the using the channel flow/Darcy analogy if one takes into
account that flowing water is affected by the fraction of pressure differential equal to AP
E.
Capillary pressures, calculated as a function of pore diameter and contact angles of
zero and sixty degrees are plotted in Figure Al .I. The intervals of pore sizes for interfiber water and intra-fiber water are also shown. Inter-fiber water is contained in the
pores greater than 1 micron diameter.
Intra-fiber water is contained in the pores having
diameters below about 0.05 microns. The graph shows that in order to express free
water, the driving pressure should be within the range 2-40 psi. Removal of the intrafiber water requires driving pressures in the range of 300 to 40000 psi. Removal of the
water from the pores less than 25 A which would produce solids more than 70%
requires pressure more than 8500 psi.
Bliesner did some earlier work on determining
average pore size. The method used for
that work was to measure “breakthrough
pressure”.
This work produced pore size
distribution
curves and permeability
measurements.
From these results hydraulic
diameter was calculated.
A comparison
of Bliesner’s results and the results obtained
from previous IPST work is shown in Figure Al .2. The trends for the two sets of data
are similar.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
114
F039
Status Report
IPST accumulated
a considerable
data base of water permeability
measurements
during
various projects over the past 4-5 years, a sample of these tests are tabulated in Table
Al .I. The majority of these test were performed at compressive
pressure of 0.02 to 2.0
MPa. From the available water permeability data three data sets were selected, the
sets represented
low, average, and high water permeability.
Permeability
as a function
of compressive
pressure was then determined
using a power function regression
K x10’* [m*] = a P b,
where
compressive
pressure
is taken in psi. Using the formula
K = D,*/32,
pore diameter as a function of compressive
pressure for the sheets having low, average
and high water permeability
were calculated
and plotted in Figure Al .I. Note that the
plotted compressive
pressures (70 MPa) are well above those used to obtain regression
formulae which may result in some inaccuracies.
The results in Table Al .I and Figure Al .I suggest that at high compressive
pressures,
permeabilities
for any sheet converges to approximately
the same number which is
about (20-50) x IO-*’ m*. The average pore diameter at such permeabilities
is about 25
40 A, which is the upper bound of the pores in the fiber wall which contain hydrogenbonded water.
Using the permeability
data, a regression function was determined
to relate the values
of apparent density to sheet solids. At high compressive
pressures, apparent density of
the sheet
c = BWIL
should approach the wood fiber density equaled to about 1.55 g/cc. As the experimental
data were obtained within the range of 0.2 to 2.0 MPa, extrapolation
to the pressures up
to 7-70 MPa may result in inaccuracies.
In some cases the values of apparent density
exceeded their theoretical maximum.
Plots of apparent density vs. compressive
pressure can be translated into the functions
of compressive
pressure vs. solids in the nip which are frequently
used in calculating
water removal for wet pressing. An equation that links the apparent density and solids,
s, can be obtained for a saturated sheet and has the form
S
=c/(c+p,-C&Y
where pw = lg/cc and pf = 1.55 g/cc.
apparent density and solids
Which
s = c/ (0.355
leads
to the following
c + I).
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
formula
linking
Project
F039
115
Status Report
Graphs reflecting effect of static compressive
pressure on the average pore size and
. outgoing solids for cases of different basis weights and specific surfaces (Data from
Table 1) are plotted in Figure Al .2. Convergence
of the average pore size is again
confirmed.
Even using static compression
outgoing solids of about 70% can be obtained
only at pressures in excess of 7 MPa. Thus, current machine solids levels of about 45%
are quite understandable.
The results plotted in Figure Al .I can be used to determine
differential
to displace water from the sheet when the sheet
compressive
load. The results can also be used to determine
with a given permeability for displacement
dewatering.
the required pressure
is also subjected
to a
the suitability of sheet
For the purposes of illustration, let’s assume that in order to bring the sheet to a
saturated state, the sheet to be subjected to displacement
dewatering
is precompressed
by the compressive
pressure of 0.7 MPa. The range of capillary resistance pressure at
this compressive
pressure is given in Table Al .2.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
I sure
116
F039
n I. I
Parameter
Low Permeability
Oven-Dry Basis Weight, gsm
Coefficient a in regression
K*l O1*=a*(Pb)
Coefficient b in regression
K*l O1*=a*(Pb)
Measured specific surface, m*/g
Measured specific volume, g/cc
Permeability*1
015, m* @I 0 psi
Average pore diameter, A, @ 10 psi
Permeability*1
015, m* @3000 psi
Average pore diameter, A, @ 3000
psi
203.7
0.0052196
Average
Permeabilitv
150.4
0.79691
High
Permeabilitv
177.4
55.005
-1.1737
-1.9204
-2.5965
62.97
0.73
0.35
1060
0.000433
37.25
99.
1.03
9.572
5538
0.000167
23.16
2.156
1.405
1329.8
66799
0.000515
40.63
Low Permeability
Average
Permeability
High
Permeabilitv
I
340 - 680
64 - 128
I
I
I
~
~
~
Table Al .2
Permeability
I
I
Status Report
I
Capillary resistance pressure at
compressive
pressure of 100 psi
I
800 - 1600
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
117
Project F039
Status Report
%
;I
-
-
1
r
1
-
I
I
I
I
-
..:i:
..:
,’
n-
-
--l-4--
$tL
I I
-
-
.Isd ‘amssq
anlssadLuo3
:!sd ‘amssad
.
Aq~de=)
.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Onlvj
Figure Al .2. Average
Hydraulic
Pore Radius vs. Permeability
8
7
__-------__
0
6
5
0
0
_____
o Rh from Bliesner Exp
Tappi
0
8 0
4
l
0
3
0
y’
-
0
2
~__
1
___------.
0
1
2
Permeability x IO 8 (m*)
3
Rh = 2.83x (K)“1/2
Project
119
F039
APPENDIX
2. Displacement
Measurement
Status Report
Results.
The displacement
measurement
system used eddy current sensors and preforated
copper target disks. These disks were either embedded
in the sheet or place at the top
and bottom surfaces of the sheet. This is the same approach as used by Burns et al.
1990, Burton and Sprague 1987. The displacement
measurement
system was used
between
April and June 1997 for an investigation
of sheet compression
and expansion
in the nip during conventional
pressing and impulse drying. A felt water receiver was
used in all cases. A schematic of the experimental
setup is shown in Figure A2.1.
Typical results of displacement
measurements
temperatures
of the platen for extended nip
Figure A2.2 - A25
Analysis of the pressure
possible to single out 4 intervals within the
compressive
phase of the nip, while the last
Interval
1: From the entrance
on the MTS press at
(2nd set of experiments)
and compression
rate
nip. First three intervals
characterizes
expansion
room and elevated
are plotted in
curves makes it
characterize
phase of the nip.
of the nip to the point at which a rapid decrease
in
compression
rate occurs
During this period of the nip, the compression
rate in flow-controlled
nip is usually very
high, because sheet is easy compressible.
Part of the applied pressure is balanced by
fiber network, while the rest of applied pressure is balanced by air which is contained in
the pores. No water or a negligble amount of water is removed from the sheet and, thus,
the hydraulic component
of total pressure is close to zero.
At a known ingoing sheet weight and solids content,
can be evaluated by using the formula
the sheet thickness
at zero porosity
L=l /A (m(p, + m&J
where
m,and
m, are mass of water and fiber in the sheet respectively;
densities of water and fiber respectively.
By comparing
air is present
the calculated and measured sheet thickness
in the sheet at the end of this interval.
p,,,,and pf are the
it can be established
that
Interval 2: From the point at which a rapid decrease in compression
rate occurs to the
point at which slows to sliqhtlv areater than zero. At a point, when the pressure inside
the sheet becomes higher than capillary pressure resistance, the water starts to flow out
of the sheet. This point corresponds
to a quasi-inflection
point in compression
rate
curve. It is thought that during this period, water in the inter-fiber space is pushed from
the sheet.
Interval 3: from quasi-inflection
point of compression
rate curve to zero compression
rate (or the minimum of sheet thickness in the nip). In this interval compression
rate is
very low which indicates that primarily intra-fiber water is removed during this period. As
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
F039
120
Status
Report
sheet compressibility
is low at high pressures, water removal in this interval is marginal.
An increase in the duration of this interval will not produce a noticeable increase in water
removal.
Interval 4: from minimum of the sheet thickness to exit of the nip (pressure is about
zero). In this interval the spring force of the compressed
sheet exceeds applied pressure
and sheet recovers. The compression
rate becomes negative. Reducing the duration of
this period should reduce rewet.
Sheet recovery continues after the nip exit. If the sheet is not separated from the felt,
post-nip rewet may occur. No thickness measurements
of completely recovered sheet
were conducted to determine total springback.
IPST Confidential Information -Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
121
F039
Figure A2.1 Displacement
Measurement
Device
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Status
Report
Figure A2.2 Displacement
Compression
Results for MTS Pressing at Room Temperature
Rate = -dL/dt, Strain = ( Lo- L) / Lo
- 0.95
800
- 0.85
-
Comp Rate
- 0.75
600
500
- 0.65
400
- 0.55
300
- 0.45
200
- 0.35
100
- 0.25
0
- 0.15
- 0.05
- -0.05
0.04
Nip Time, set
0.06
0.08
0 . 1.
E
E
uiu)
i!
-5
z
3
i!
co
$
b
co
123
Project F039
Status Report
s
.-0
0
E
0
c)
nl
a
a,
“3
.F
LL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
o
E
g
m
o
%
oco
E
z
r,as/LuuJ
*
0
‘0 1
qed aA!ssaJdwo=> r!sd ‘amssa-rd payddv
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
0
0
I
0
0
clI
0
Project F039
124
Status Report
co
- 0
d
*
- 0
d
0
0
00
0
0
b
0
0
(0
0
0
m
0
0
d-
0
0
m
0
0
N
0
0
\
0
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Onlv1
0
0
I
- 0
0
0
NI
ki
cn
ai
.-E
I-
.-Q
z
Project
125
F039
Status Report
-
0
g
0
g
0
g
YLa)ey
0
0
m
0
g
0
g
anissaJduro=>
:!sd
.
0
E
0
0
‘aJtWS3Jd
0
0
0
I
payddv
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
0
0
NI
0
126
127
REMOVING
IMPULSE
LIMITATIONS
ON DWELL TIME OF WET-PRESSES,
DRYERS, AND DISPLACEMENT
DEWATERING
STATUS REPORT
FOR
PROJECT FO40
Paul Phelan (PI)
lsaak Rudman
Marcos Abazeri
Edward Lindahl
March 8 - 9,200O
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30318
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
128
129
Project FO40
Status Report
DUES-FUNDED PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Title:
Project Code:
Project Number:
PAC:
REMOVING LIMITATIONS ON
DWELL TIME OF WET-PRESSES,
IMPULSE DRYERS, AND
DISPLACEMENT DEWATERING
TECHNOLOGY
LONG DWELL
FO40
PAPERMAKING
Project Staff
Principal Investigator:
Research Support Staff:
P. Phelan
I. Rudman, M. Abazeri, E. Lindahl
PAC Subcommittee
C. Kramer, F. Palumbo, N. Rudd
FY 99-00 Budget:
Allocated as Matching Funds:
$143,052
None
Time Allocation:
Principal Investigator:
Research Support Staff:
50%
Technician (50%)
Supporting Research:
Special Students:
External (Where Matching Is Used):
None
None
RESEARCH LINE/ROADMAP: Line #7 - Increase paper machine productivity by 30%
over 1997 levels via focus on breakthrough forming, de-watering, and drying concepts.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to improve productivity by
increasing water removal while maintaining and/or improving bulk and other sheet
properties. This will be achieved by increasing the effective dwell time of wet presses,
impulse dryers, and displacement de-watering devices (FY 99-00 focus is on wet
pressing). Technical approaches to implementing the technology may be evaluated.
PROJECT BACKGROUND: This is a new project for FY 99-00. The P.I. was changed
from D. Orloff to P. Phelan in November, 1999.
MILESTONES: The following tasks were presented at the Fall ‘99 PAC meeting.
1. Survey the literature on shoe press technology with an emphasis on current
and projected use in the manufacture of grades other than linerboard and
corrugating medium. (Completed by first quarter, FY 99-00)
2. Determine how existing shoe press technology can be best utilized in the
manufacture of bulk sensitive printing and writing grades. (Rejected by the
PAC)
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
130
Project FO40
Status Report
3. Determine if there is justification for developing a “Super-Long Nip HighLoad” press. (Completed by fourth quarter, FY 99-00) Note: The PAC
suggested that this task be the focus for fiscal year 99-00.
4. Identify and resolve the technical barriers to the development of a SLN-HL
press. (Completed by fourth quarter, FY 00-01)
5. Design, build and evaluate a prototype with respect to technical and
economic factors important to commercialization. (Completed by fourth
quarter, FY 01-02)
DELIVERABLES:
The PAC agreed on experiments to justify the use of a SLN-HL press
for a copy paper grade. Initial experiments will look at the impact of a third position SLNHL press on water removal and sheet property development. The experiments should
be completed and reported to the PAC at the Spring ‘00 meeting with an economic
analysis of the impact. The PAC will recommend continuation or termination of the
project based on the results.
STATUS
OF GOALS
FOR FY 99-00: The goal for the Spring, ‘00 PAC meeting is to
complete initial experiments justifying a SLN-HL third press for copy paper at two
refining levels and report the results. Experiments were completed in January, 2000.
Proposed goals for completion by the end of the fiscal year are to conduct the same
experiment with the SLN-HL press in the first press position and write a member report
on all of the results obtained in 1999-00. Production of Formette sheets are to begin in
February, 2000.
SCHEDULE:
Task Descriptions
(example)
I. Literature Survev
3a. Justification at
Third Press
3b. Justification at
First Press(proposed)
4. Identify & Resolve
Technical Barriers
5. Build & Evaluate
Prototype
6. Write yearly report
(proposed)
1999
July - Sept
---m---m----X
1999
Ott - Dee
2000
Jan - Mar
2000
Apr-Jun
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
j 2-7
12-E
j
Project
131
FO40
Status
Report
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS:
Experiments
were completed using a copy paper furnish at
two levels of freeness and 40% ingoing solids. Five different cases of peak pressure and
impulse, for the same basic shoe press profile, were tested for each freeness level. The
following results were obtained.
l
The 400 ml CSF furnish
was predominantly
flow-controlled.
l
The 500 ml CSF furnish
was predominantly
pressure-controlled.
l
Density
is a linear function
l
Tensile
apparently
l
l
SUMMARY
l
l
l
l
is no apparent
(outgoing
with increasing
density,
increases
Brightness and opacity
scatter in the data.
There
of water removal
are apparently
trend for Sheffield
unaffected,
solids).
but the change
is slight.
but there is a large amount
of
roughness.
OF KEY CONCLUSIONS:
As a third press a SLN-HL press can remove more water at higher impulses than
a “standard” shoe press. There is a corresponding
increase in density, but the
increase does not appear to affect optical properties.
Estimated
years.
payback
periods
for a runnability-limited
Estimated
years.
payback
periods
for a dryer-limited
machine
machine
range from 4 to 46
range from 0.5 to 6.2
There may be more potential for increased water removal, while maintaining
bulk, if the SLN-HL press was in the first position, before the sheet is densified
by roll presses. Additionally,
a SLN-HL press, potentially, may be used to reduce
the number of press nips, reducing rewet.
DISCUSSION:
Experimental
Plan and Procedures
Furnish:
The furnishes made for this trial simulate copy paper and were made using
the Formette Dynamic at 900 m/min. The pulp was a blend of 75% hardwood and 25%
softwood.
Each pulp was refined to two freeness levels, 400 and 500 ml CSF and then
blended.
Table 1 lists the additives used.
Plan: The Formette sheets were cut into 5-inch diameter test samples for pressing.
Table 2 shows the MTS conditions used. After pressing the samples were dried under
constraint and tested as shown in Table 3.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
FO40
132
Status
Report
Figures 1 and 2 show examples of the type of generic shoe press pulses that were
used. All of the pulses had the same relative shape, except that the depressuriation
part of the pulse was the same for all cases. The exact shape was determined
when
the MTS is programmed.
Cases 1, 2 and 3 had the same peak pressure, but the dwell
time was varied to correspond to the different shoe lengths. Cases 1, 4 and 5 had the
same impulse, but different dwell times and peak pressures.
Results
The outgoing solids levels, for each furnish, are shown in Figures 3 and 4. For the 400
ml CSF furnish, water removal is flow-controlled,
as shown by the increase in solids with
increasing impulse but with little change with increasing pressure. However, the 500 ml
CSF furnish is predominantly
pressure-controlled
with a slight increase in solids with
increasing impulse and a greater increase with increasing pressure.
Figures 5 and 6 further indicate that the 500 ml CSF furnish is pressure-controlled
by
showing a stronger influence of pressure than impulse on density. On the other hand,
the density for the 400 ml CSF furnish has little dependence
on pressure, but increases
with increasing impulse. Both furnishes have a linear relationship
between density and
outgoing solids as shown in Figure 7.
Most strength properties increase with increasing density. However, the paper used in
this experiment
had low overall strength for reasons unknown at this time. Figure 8
shows that the geometric mean tensile index for both furnishes only has a slight
increase with increasing density. Also plotted, for comparison,
are the results of a
commercially
available copy paper tested at the same time. The MIT fold data were so
low that the results are meaningless,
most counts were less than 10 and the highest
was 14. None of those data are in this report.
In Figure 9 the Gurley porosity data for the 500 ml CSF furnish increases with increasing
density and are relatively low indicating an open furnish. For the 400 ml CSF furnish the
data are more scattered and have no correlation with density. Data for Sheffield
roughness,
IS0 brightness, and opacity do not show any significant trends or have large
scatter. All of the data are summarized
in Table 4.
Conclusions
Scientific
Operating as a third press, a Super-Long
Nip High-Load press must operate at high
pressures and impulses (cases 2 or 3) to increase water removal. For a flow-controlled
furnish this will result in a substantial increase in sheet density, while for a pressurecontrolled furnish the density increase is minimal. Data from this experiment
are
inconclusive
about the detrimental
effect of increased density on opacity, but there are
indications that the change is insignificant.
Therefore, the use of a Super-Long
Nip HighLoad press would result in a net benefit based on increased productivity.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
133
FO40
Squeezing more water out of the web by using high
increasing productivity.
For a bulk sensitive furnish,
without increasing density. Using a Super-Long
Nip
may accomplish
this with a long dwell, low pressure
Status Report
pressures has economic benefits by
it would be better to remove water
High-Load press as a first press
pulse (cases 4 and 5).
Economic
Using the IPST Economic Model developed for project ROCIT, two economic scenarios
were investigated.
Both assumed a papermachine
producing 75.2 gsm copy paper. The
base case assumed a machine speed of 3300 fpm and a production of 842 FMT/day.
For each of these scenarios, it was assumed that the press section could be rebuilt at
three levels of capital investment,
$5M, $lOM, or $15M. The differential increase in
gross profits was calculated for each improvement
in capibilities. The estimated capital
cost of rebuilding the press section was divided by the differential profit to obtain an
estimated payback (in years).
The first scenario was for a runnability-limited
machine with 3.0% downtime due to sheet
breaks. Higher ougoing solids from the press section would reduce the number of
breaks resulting in higher overall productivity.
Table 5 lists the estimated payback
periods calculated.
The second scenario was for a dryer-limited
machine with press section outgoing solids
of 42.0%. Using the rule-of-thumb
that for a dryer limited machine, each percentage
point of increased solids out of the press section results in a 4% increase in machine
speed, payback periods were calculated for up to 4-percentage
points of increased
dryness. The results are in Table 6.
Suggested
Future
Work
The potential for removing water while maintaining
bulk by using a Super-Long
Nip
High-Load press as a first press should be investigated
by repeating this experiment
with a lower ingoing solids level and no prepressing.
Without the prepressing to densify
the sheet, a low pressure SLN-HL press could gently squeeze out water while
maintaining
bulk. To maximize water removal, it is suggested that the experiment
use
double felted pressing with a grooved platen on the top and bottom.
Another potential benefit of using a Super-Long
Nip High-Load press would be to
eliminating press nips. Each nip has the potential to introduce rewet as the web exits the
nip. Eliminating nips has the potential of increasing the final outgoing solids from the
press section, even with the same total impulse. Using a Super-Long
Nip High-Load
press with an optimized profile may reduce the press section to a single nip with
resulting capital and space savings. A proposed experiment
would compare two nips to
a single long nip.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project
134
FO40
Status
Report
Figures
1000
900
800
1000
900
800
-: 700
g600
0.01
0.02
0.03
Time (s)
0.04
0.05
48
46
0
t
38!."
0.00
[y),
?tk
I “‘:
0.04
0.08
..‘:
Impulse
0.12
..‘:
400 ml CSFl
500 ml CSF
3
0.03
Time (s)
0.05
0.04
0.06
0.16
‘..:
0.20
..’
.E42-l
3%40-- :
0 :
f
0.68-l
0.66-0.64-l
0.08
Impulse
0.12
4
Pressure
(MPa*s)
0.70--
0.62!...1..-1...:-.-:...:...~
0.00 0.04
38:.~~.~..~~:..~.:...~~.~.~~.~..~~~.~
3
0
1
2
I-
0.24
Figure 3. Outgoing solids for cases 1, 2, and 3.
g.E
E
-g
5
:g
0.02
Figure 2. Pulses with same impulse.
44 i
40
0.01
t
.g 42-F
9
1
41
51
j--Case
0
0.06
Figure 1. Pulses with same peak pressure.
+j
0
m
+-Case
I-Case
f\
-$$- 700
9600
0
g
-
---
0.16
0.20
0.24
(MPa*s)
Figure 5. Density verses impulse for all cases.
5
6
7
(MPa)
Figure 4. Outgoing solids for cases 1, 4, and 5.
g
.g
$
u
i!
:g
u
0.70-L
3
0.62t,...~....1....:..-'~....~..'.:....!
0
1
2
0.68-l
0.66-l
0.64-l
Pressure
3
4
5
6
(MPa)
Figure 6. Density verses peak pressure for all
cases.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
7
Project
s
E
9
9
s.-3
2
0”
135
FO40
Status
Report
0.74
0.72
U
z
.-5
:
.-G
c
s
0.70
0.68
0.66
0.64
0.621 1 . .
40
42
: .
; . .
44
46
Outgoing Solids (%)
1 . . 1 !
48
50
Figure 7. Density verses outgoing solids for all cases.
45
r
.-
‘;3;
40
z2 35
L
ii530
2
z.- 25
e2!20
I;
IOG
z
8
;
.-z
iii
5
n
L,2
6
Conditioned
Density (kg/m*3)
Figure 8. Geometric mean tensile index verses
density for all cases.
’
‘.
:
‘.
:
‘.
f..
.
:.
:
“.
9-a--
H
7 --
H
+
@
65-
;
4-.
ii
pzzF1;
&I
3--
I
'062.
tI .
0.66
. 14 . . . II . . . .
0.70
Conditioned
0.74
0.78
I . . .
0.82
0.86
Density (kglm”3)
Figure 9. Gurley porosity verses density for all
cases.
Tables
Table 1. Sheet additives.
Amount
Additive
15% of dry weight
PCC
1 Optical Briqhtener
1 2 Ibs./ton
1 3 Ibs./ton
1 AKD
March
I 12 Ibs./ton
2 Ibs./ton
Retention Aid
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
136
Status
Value
Condition
.
Platen
Beloit J
1
10, 20, and 30 inches
1 Nip Lenqth
w
3000 ft/min (914 m/min)
I Machine Speed
Basis weight
67 gsm OD
Single-felted
wet pressing simulated
Pulses
Standard’
Press load (Case 1) 4500 pli (788 kN/m)
Freeness
400 and 500 ml CSF
40%
Ingoing solids
Preheat
none
Fine Paper felt, preconditioned
Felts
Ingoing Felt Moisture
20%
30
Repeats per Case
Table 3. Testing.
Non-destructive
Tests
Gurley Porosity (T460)
Opacity (T519)
IS0 Brightness (T534)
Sheffield Roughness
(T538)
Table 4. Average
I CasF!
-v-v
Freeness(ml)
Dwell Time (ms)
PeakPressure(MPa)
lmpulse(MPa*s)
Basis Weight
(gsm)
ingoing Solids (%)
Outgoing
Solids (%)
Soft Platen Caliper(pm)
Cond. Density(kglm"3)
Cond. Bulk(mA3/kg)
Gurley
Por. (s/lOOml)
Top Sheffield
(ml/min)
Bot. Sheffield
(mI/min)
MDTensile
lndex(N*m/g)
CDTensileindex(N*m/g)
GM Tensile
lndex(N*m/g)
IS0 Brightness
.
I Ooacitv
Table 5. Estimated
Breaks
(4OO
30.
25.
20.
15.
10.
400
17
6.17
0.062
66.74
39.02
44.37
105.7
0.671
1.493
8.09
1778
2190
34.83
15.69
23.38
87.72
I 88.86
payback
shoe press
Destructive Tests
MD and CD Tensile, 4-inch span (T494)
MD and CD MIT Fold (T511)
OD weight (basis weight, bulk)
values for physical
Ii
Report
properties.
12131415111213l4
400
400
35
52
6.19
6.21
0.126
0.197
66.21
66.69
39.29
39.47
46.73
48.55
100.9
97.8
400
33
3.18
0.063
67.05
39.45
43.95
105.5
0.696
1.436
7.87
1763
2151
36.48
16.38
24.44
87.92
I 88.23
01674
1.483
6.73
1780
2077
32.05
15.70
22.43
88.27
89.07
I
0.723
1.385
7.53
1692
2078
34.93
14.83
22.76
88.47
88.69
I
I
I
400
49
2.06
0.063
66.85
39.67
43.34
106.8
0.667
1.504
5.13
1519
1732
31.14
13.68
20.64
88.59
89.36
I
500
17
6.20
0.063
68.41
40.13
47.67
108.3
0.669
1.495
4.88
1598
1959
29.37
12.64
19.27
88.66
88.96
I
500
35
6.19
0.127
68.02
40.49
49.21
106.5
0.675
1.483
5.00
1648
1958
29.18
13.21
19.63
88.51
88.84
500
52
6.20
0.196
65.90
40.69
49.54
102.3
0.683
1.465
4.65
1647
1928
30.00
13.65
20.24
88.10
1 88.15
periods
(years) for a runnability-limited
Capital Costs
5,000 k$
10,000 k$
154.
77.
52.
39.
309
15’4
IO.3.
77.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
500
33
3.17
0.063
67.35
40.34
45.66
110.3
0.649
1.543
3.78
1750
1904
28.71
12.76
19.14
88.63
1 88.54
151Com.I
500
49
2.05
0.063
68.34
40.39
44.31
114.0
0.637
1.570
3.64
1786
1912
30.58
12.37
19.45
88.53
I 88.70
machine.
15,000
463
23’2
15’5
11’6.
k$
#
72.71
94.1
0.828
1.208
8.16
1492
1347
64.43
26.88
41.62
84.15
I 89.11
I
Project
137
F040
Table 6. Estimated
1 Solids Increase
(% Points)
0
1
I
2
I
I
3
payback
1
I
I
I
periods
(years) for a dryer-limited
machine.
Capital Costs
5,000 k$
lb,000 k$
21.
10.
07.
05.
I
I
I
41.
21.
14.
IO.
~~
I
~~ I
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
15,000
I
62.
31.
21.
16.
k$
I
I
138
139
EXTENDING
HIGH INTENSITY WATER REMOVAL PRINCIPLES
INTO THE DRYER SECTIONS
STATUS REPORT
FOR
PROJECT
F041
Fred Ahrens (PI)
Paul Phelan
lsaak Rudman
Edward Lindahl
March 8 - 9,200O
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30318
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s
Internal Use Only)
140
141
Project F041
DUES-FUNDED
PROJECT
Status Report
SUMMARY
Project
Title:
Extending
High Intensity
Water
Removal
Principles
into the
Dryer Section
Project
Number:
F041
PAPERMAKING
PAC:
Project
PAC
Staff
Principal
Investigator:
Co-Investigators:
Research
Support
Staff:
Subcommittee
FY 99-00 Budget:
Allocated
Time
as Matching
Funds:
Allocation:
Principal
Investigator:
Co-Investigators:
Research
Support
Staff:
Supporting
Research:
Students:
External
(Where
Matching
F. Ahrens
P. Phelan,
Lindahl
I. Rudman
Babinsky,
Kaufman,
$86,000
OY0
15%
25%
20%
Is Used):
N. Alaimo
None
(M.S.)
RESEARCH LINE/ROADMAP:
Line #7 - Increase paper machine
over ‘97 levels via focus on breakthrough
forming, dewatering,
concepts
[faster drying]
PROJECT OBJECTIVE:
Demonstrate/verify
a high intensity
the basis for a feasible, high productivity,
capital/space/energy
Provide the data and understanding
needed for development.
PROJECT
BACKGROUND:
Watson
productivity by 30%
and drying
drying concept that provides
effective dryer system.
New DFRC project in FY 99-00 (started July 1999)
MILESTONES:
a
Identification
of promising conditions and configurations
intensity drying experiments
[by Mar. 20001
for initial laboratory
high
Completion of high intensity drying experiments to demonstrate
the drying rate
potential and guide concept development
[First phase by Mar. 20001
0
Development
fundamentals
of promising concept(s) [ based on systematic application of
and analysis of experimental
results] [review - Mar. 20001
0
Development
of plan to refine the concept(s)
[Q4, FY 99-001
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
142
Project F041
0
Identification
l
Completion
of equipment
of preliminary
DELIVERABLES:
0
High intensity
Definition
of preliminary
assessment
[Q4, FY 99-001
[Q4, FY 99-001
[Mar. 20001
simulation
and technical
analysis
technical
and economic
analysis
of most promising
Data and understanding
issues/requirements
technical/economic
dryer concept(s)
Results of laboratory
[Q4, FY 99-001
Results
and clothing
Status Report
concept
needed
and applications
for scale-up
of promising
[Q4, FY 99-001
[FY 00-011
[FY 00-011
Model of PAPRlCAN’s
high intensity (impingement)
drying concept
collaboration
with PAPRICAN]
{proposed new task}
STATUS
OF GOALS
concept(s)
[via proposed
FOR FY 99-00:
Identify promising
Fall ‘991
conditions
and configurations
for drying experiments:
[completed
Conduct high intensity drying experiments
to demonstrate
the drying rate potential
and guide further concept development:
[ First phase completed]
Develop
analysis
promising concept(s) based on systematic application of fundamentals
of experimental
results: [Progress review at March PAC meeting]
Develop
plan to refine the concept(s):
Submit pre-proposal
to Agenda
[Spring
20001
2020 Capital Effectiveness
Program:
[Nov. 19991
Model of PAPRICAN’s high intensity (impingement)
dryer concept [via proposed
collaboration with PAPRICAN]: [proposed new task - under development]
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
and
143
Project F041
Status Report
SCHEDULE:
I
Task
Defineinitial experiments
.
Perform initial experiments
Develop promising concept
Plan
for concept refinement
I
Identify equipment/clothing
issues
Preliminary technical/economic
evaluation
Data for scale-up
Model of PAPRICAN concept
I
SUMMARY
I
FY 99-00
Ql
Q2
X
Q3
X
X
X
X
X
X
_
Q4
I
FY 00-01
Ql
Q2
Q3
X
1
I
I
I
Ixl~lxlxIxI
OF RESULTS:
Initial MTS experiments
demonstrated
very large (heat input based) drying rates
(I 000’s of kg/hr/sq m) for simulated copy paper and linerboard, over an applied
pressure range of 10 to 1000 psi (applied in one or two 20 ms pulses), with
surface temperatures
of 149 to 233 OC, for initial solids levels of 50% and 70%.
In response to an inquiry from PAPRICAN,
the PAPRICAN high intensity (impingement)
been developed.
Focus is on development
computer model of the concept.
SUMMARY
a preliminary proposal for interaction with
drying effort (for printing grades) has
and pilot machine verification
of a
OF KEY CONCLUSIONS:
According to the initial laboratory simulation results, it should be possible to
accomplish (via multiple cycles of intense heat input and vapor removal on a high
temperature
cylinder) drying equivalent to that normally associated with
several/numerous
dryer cans and their open draws.
l
A wide range of “shoe press” loadings and surface temperatures
appear to be
useful, offering the opportunity to identify a technically and economically
feasible
design.
The vapor removal
development.
,
X
X
X
Preliminary/simplified
concept definition: Heat input via multiple long, moderate
pressure nips, with interspersed
vapor removal areas, on high temperature
cylinders. The sheet would be restrained by a suitable fabric or felt.
0
Q4
and sheet restraint
strategies
still need attention
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
and
144
Project F041
DISCUSSION and ADDITIONAL
Status Report
DETAILS
INTRODUCTION
The dryer sections prevalent for most grades of paper and board are based on use of contact
heat transfer from numerous steam heated dryer cans and movement of large volumes of
heated air for vapor removal. Dryer sections have undergone evolutionary changes in
recent years [e.g., recent developments include the single-tier configuration and the
incorporation of impingement units at selected stations in the dryer section], but are still
limited to rather low overall drying rates, resulting in very long, expensive systems and
only modest-to-good energy efficiency.
In view of the industry need for increased productivity, improved capital effectiveness, and
reduced energy use, it is timely to seek to apply the principles and techniques associated
with high-intensity heat transfer and water removal (including, but not limited to,
adaptations of technology developed for impulse drying) to the challenging task of making
beneficial step increases in drying rates for paper and board. In this project we intend to
bring together available technical tools and new ideas for implementing high-intensity heat
transfer and water removal principles, in order to overcome the heat and mass transfer
impediments associated with current approachesto drying. The goal of the work is to
develop a feasible high-intensity drying concept having the potential to make the paper
machine dryer section at least an order of magnitude smaller, and significantly more energy
efficient, than a conventional dryer section of the same capacity. Preliminary analysis and
literature review in Fall 1999 indicates that it should be possible to achieve drying rates well
in excess of those offered by the best currently available technologies (impingement drying
and Condebelt), and points toward a particular implementation concept.
The benefits from successful commercial implementation of expected project results are as
follows. For retrofit of existing machines, it will be possible to install significant extra
capacity in a smaller space and at lower capital cost than for comparable conventional
capacity. For new machines, greatly reduced space and capital cost, and increased energy
efficiency, will be achieved; the very low drying rates and enormous dryer sections of
today will be avoided (e.g., using 2 to 4 larger, high drying rate cylinders rather than 40 to
100 standard dryer cans).
TECHNICAL
BASIS FOR SUCCESS
Conventional paper drying involves low-pressure (cl psi) thermal contact between the
sheet and numerous steam-heatedcylinders for heat input, with low intensity convective
mass transfer (drying via evaporative cooling) in the draws between these cylinders (as
well as on the lower cylinders, in single-tier dryer sections). Although paper drying is
always a combined heat and mass transfer process, in the conventional dryer section there
is only a relatively minor amount of evaporation while the sheetis covered by a fabric on
the dryer cylinder. Therefore, conventional paper drying can be viewed as a cyclic process
[cycles of heat transfer to the sheet (heat-up) followed by mass transfer from the sheet
(accompanied by cooling of the sheet)]. The use of a hot air impingement unit over the
fabric-covered sheet (on the dryer cylinder) would introduce a greater component of
simultaneous heat and mass transfer to the drying process, via increasing the extent of
vapor removal while the sheet is on the dryer cylinder. Additionally, the unit would
increase the total rate of heat transfer to the sheet.Consideration of these principles (cyclic
vs. simultaneous heat and mass transfer) should be useful in helping to establish and
discuss a preliminary concept for a high intensity dryer.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F041
145
Status Report
Mention of a key concept relevant to development of a high intensity dryer is believed
important, at this point. That is, there are two distinct modes by which mass transfer from
a paper web can take place. The dominant one in nearly all current drying processesis
diffusion of vapor within the web, coupled with convective diffusion from the web surface
to the surroundings. The driving force for this process is a vapor partial pressure gradient.
This mode occurs when the web temperature is below the ambient boiling point (which is
the case in the conventional dryer section). The web temperature is, of course, influenced
by heat transfer rate. The resistanceto mass transfer in the web and in the adjacent
boundary layer is a major factor limiting drying rate.
The other mode for mass transfer can be called bulk vapor flow. Here, the driving force is
a total pressure gradient. It occurs if the web temperature exceeds (even slightly) the
ambient boiling-point. In this case, the only resistance to mass transfer is inside the web,
and it is inversely related to the vapor permeability. This resistanceis typically negligible
compared to the-diffusional resistance-mentioned-above.Therefore, it tends to be only heat
transfer factors that limit the drying rate. However, very intense heat transfer to the web is
needed to enter into this regime (which can, therefore, be defined as the high-intensity
drying regime). An early description of the transition from conventional drying to high
intensity drying can be found in Ref. 1. The Condebelt process is the only known
commercial process in which the bulk flow mode of vapor removal occurs (in it, the vapor
leaving the sheet condenseson a cooler adjacent surface). A consequenceof the bulk flow
mode of vapor transport is that the energy transport within the web is enhanced by intense
‘heat pipe effects’ (evaporation-flow-condensation). This implies that temperature
differences in wet portions of the web tend to be small (provided the permeability does not
become too low).
As a point of technical interest, one other statement can be made concerning the drying
process. That is, pure impingement drying (i.e., simultaneous convective heat and mass
transfer) can, at best, provide wet web temperatures equal to the ‘wet bulb temperature’,
which can only approach the ambient boiling point. Thus, although relatively high drying
rates may be possible with this technique, it is not an example of high-intensity drying, as
defined here. This statement is not intended to imply that impingement heat and/or mass
transfer should be disregarded as a potentially useful tool in achieving a successful high
intensity dryer concept.
It might be noted that example calculations of mass transfer rates for both modes, and other
information on transport phenomena in the web, were included in the Fall 1999 Project
F041 presentation to the Papermaking PAC. This material will not be repeatedhere, but it
is believed to support the preliminary concept definition given below.
Although, the high intensity mode has excellent potential for increasing drying rate, its
limitations should be noted. If web vapor permeability does become small (perhaps due to
the web moisture content being high and/or due to high levels of compression), the internal
vapor pressure can become large (relative to the ambient pressure).In this case, if the web
has insufficient restraint (relative to its cohesive strength), delamination can occur. A less
serious phenomenon (liftoff, a loss of thermal contact between the sheet and the hot
surface) is also believed possible under some conditions. A further limitation to high
intensity drying is that a dry layer tends to develop in the sheet (adjacent to the hot surface);
its thickness increaseswith contact time, tending to gradually reduce heat transfer rate (2).
A successful dryer concept would need to manage this effect.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
146
Project F041
PRELIMINARY
Status Report
CONCEPT DEFINITION
Since mass transfer impediments can be removed by operating in the high-intensity drying
mode, concepts compatible with that regime have been given primary attention. With heat
transfer-related factors tending to control drying rate in the high-intensity drying regime,
they represent a major focus of the preliminary concept definition effort.
The two most important factors for high heat transfer rate to the web are large temperature
difference (driving force) and low thermal resistancebetween the hot surface and the web.
These factors point toward use of high-surface-temperature dryer (using an as yet
unspecified heat source) and higher than conventional mechanical pressure (to increase the
contact heat transfer coefficient). Loading considerations will, of course, place a limit on
the combinations of pressure level and contact area at pressurethat are feasible. A further,
direct restriction on mechanical pressurelevel could come from either its impact on sheet
bulk or its related impact (via web vapor permeability) on the possibility of
blistering/delamination.
The phenomenon mentioned earlier concerning a dry layer, of continuously increasing
thickness, developing during the high intensity drying process suggeststwo other
considerations. It may be desirable to interrupt the regions of intense heat transfer
periodically to allow some z-directional redistribution of moisture to occur. It may also be
desirable to alternate heat input from one surface of the sheetto the other at reasonable
intervals.
The first of these points is compatible with the use of shoe press-like devices at intervals
around the cylinder. In this context, the term ‘shoe press-like’ refers to the general
configuration, but is certainly not intended to imply that the pressurelevels and clothing
employed should be similar to those associatedwith shoe pressesfor wet pressing or
impulse drying. In fact, it is believpedthat the best range of pressure for high intensity
drying may be we1.1below that for wet pressing. The purposes are quite different. Ii the
drying application, we are not seeking to squeezewater from the sheet,but to improve heat
transfer. It can be expected that vapor removal via the bulk flow mechanism (i.e., flow
from the sheet into the felt) would occur while the sheet is being intensely heated in the
shoe press nip zone. After the sheet leaves the nip, it may evaporatively cool to
temperaturesbelow the ambient boiling point. In this between nip region, an appropriate
sheet-restraining fabric may be needed to provide restraint against shrinkage effects, as well
as to promote acontinuation of heat transfer to the sheet (possibly at a reduced rate due to
the reduced applied pressure).Also in the between nip region, impingement could
potentially be employed to increase the local mass transfer (drying) rate.
INITIAL
HIGH INTENSITY
DRYING EXPERIMENTS
As suggestedby the above description of high intensity drying principles, and the
preliminary concept definition, adaptation of shoe pressing techniques, coupled with higher
than conventional dryer surface temperatures, should offer an opportunity to achieve large
heat transfer .anddrying rate increases.The experiments described here were intended to
provide an initial, relatively broad, overview of the effects on water removal of “shoe
press” variables (pressure level, number of pressure pulses [ 1 vs. 2]), surface temperature,
initial sheet solids level and grade. The particular objective of these initial (heated MTS
press) experiments is to demonstrate and quantify the drying rate (heat transfer aspects)
potential, and to guide the development of high intensity drying concepts that integrate
multiple “shoe pressing” nips (to intensify heat transfer) and higher than conventional
surface temperatures into the drying process. A limitation of this initial work is that short
dwell times between pressure pulses were not achievable on the MTS [2 set was shortest].
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
147
Project F041
Experimental
Status Report
Plan
Test Conditions:
Samples: These were 4” diameter circular discs cut from handsheets.
1. Linerboard-like sheets:
l
205 gsm
l
100% unbleached softwood kraft
l
500-550 CSF
l
50% initial solids (via pressing to at least 45%, followed by air
drying, if necessary)
Initial sheet solids: 2 levels: 50% and 70%
Surface Temperature: 2 levels: 300 F and 450 F [ 149 C and 232 C]
Dwell times:
l
single nip: 20 ms
l
multi-nip: 2 hits at 20 ms each, with 1 level of dwell (minimum
possible) in between [about 2 set]
Applied Pressure Pulse: 3 levels: 10, 100, 1000 psi
Repeats: 10, for each test condition
2. Copy paper-like sheets:
l
70 gsm
l
75% BHWKl25% BSWK
l
450 CSF
l
50% initial solids (via pressing to at least 45%, followed by air
drying)
Initial sheet solids: Mainly 50%; limited 70% solids runs at one pressure
Surface Temperature: 2 levels: 300 F and 450 F [ 149 C and 232 C]
Dwell times:
l
single nip: 1 level: 20 ms
l
multi-nip: 2 hits at 20 ms each, with 1 level of dwell (minimum
possible) in between [about 2 set]
Applied Pressure Pulse: 3 levels: 10, 100, 1000 psi
Repeats: 10, for each test condition
l
l
Procedures:
Each sample was supported on a “dry” felt, which was resting on the lower platen of
the MTS press. The dry felt pressesthe sheet against the hot platen, serves as a water
receiver, and permits some vapor venting to occur.
In a limited number of runs, fine thermocouples were placed between the sheet and felt,
to provide some insight on the heat transfer process.
Experimental
Results and Discussion
The above experimental program has recently been completed. The primary results and
observations are presented here. Analysis and interpretation of these results is still in
progress, but some preliminary discussion is included.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
148
Project F041
StatusReport
For each experimental condition, the water removal data were used to calculate a drying rate
based on residence time in the shoe press nip period(s) (i.e., either 20 ms or 40 ms). The
drying rate defined in this manner representsan upper bound on the actualdrying ratethat
occurred in the experiment, or on that achievable in practice. It representsthe (heat transfer
based) drying rate for an ideal situation in which vapor removal (evaporation) is
instantaneous. In effect, this rate definition also corresponds to the assumption that the
sample is in good thermal contact with the hot surface only during the pressure pulse(s)
(perhaps not always the case in practice).
The drying rates, as defined above, are presentedin Figures 1, 3 and 4 [some limited
additional data, for the bleached, 70 gsm samples, at 10 psi peak pressure and 70% initial
solids, appear in Table 11. For the bleached, copy paper-like sheets,the total water
removal was sufficiently large as to make it interesting to present the final sheets solids
data, as well (see Fig. 2). Over the entire range of the experimental program, the nip
residence time based drying rate ranged from 1100 to about 9700 (kg/h/sq m)’ . For
reference, note that typical ‘TAPPI drying rates’ are in the 15 to 30 kg/h/sq m range,
impingement units provide rates of about 60 to 110 kg/h/sq m, and Condebelt rates can
likely be as high as 150 kg/h/sq m.
The actual drying rate based on total residence time in the dryer, comprising both periods in
the shoe press nip(s) and time between/after nips [e.g., available for vapor removal from
the web], will be less than that based on nip residence time, alone. The relationship is:
DR actual
=
DRnrt * NRTI TRT
where:
DR actual = actual - drying - rate
D&l rt =nip- residence - time - based - drying - rate
TRT=NRT+ANRT
.
TRT= total residencetime
NRT= nip residence time
ANRT= after-nip residence time (= between nip time, for a multi-nip dryer)
The rates presented in Figs. 1,3 and 4 are all in the range of about 10 to 100 times greater
than the actual rates typical for either impingement drying or Condebelt drying. Therefore,
if the time needed for vapor removal (ANRT) can be kept to less than about 10 to 100 times
the nip residence time, respectively, the actual drying rates for the high intensity dryer
concept envisioned here should exceed those for the fastest currently available technologies
(impingement drying and Condebelt). Intuitively, it would seem likely that ANRT/NRT
ratios considerably shorter 10 should be adequatefor vapor removal. This is one topic
meriting investigation in the near future. The amount of heat transfer occurring (and
contributing to the actual drying rate) via post-nip contact also needsto be investigated.
’ Note: dividing drying rate in (kg/h/sq m) by 4.88 converts it to (lb/h/sq fi).
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F041
149
Status Report
Inspection of the drying results in the cited figures reveals the following:
l
l
l
l
l
The rate increases with surface temperature and applied pressure.These results are
compatible with the elementary heat transfer concepts of thermal driving force and of
pressure-dependentcontact resistance,respectively.
The rate decreasesfor two nips, compared to one nip. This is compatible with the
existence of a dry layer near the hot surface impeding heat transfer in the second nip.
The rate is less for a 70% ingoing solids level than for 50% ingoing solids. This is
compatible with the expectation that drier paper is a better insulator than wetter paper.
The drying rate for the 70 gsm web is greater than that for the 205 gsm web. This may
be due to a greater part of the heat input being needed for sensible heating, in the case
of the heavier web.
For the bleached, lighter weight sheets,the high intensity drying experiments led to
very high final solids levels (Fig. 2).
Another aspect of the experimental program involved tracking the sticking and blistering
tendencies of the paper samples. A summary of these observations is provided in Tables 1
and 2. The first point to be made about these results is that blistering/delamination was
found to occur at only the most intense condition (232 C, 1000 psi), and only for the 205
gsm samples at 50 % initial solids. Thus, there seems to be plenty of opportunity to apply
high intensity drying ideas without undue concern about delamination.
Sticking was more frequently observed, but the practical significance of these observations
is not yet clear. The tendency for sticking was greater for the linerboard than for the copy
paper-like samples. The tendency was also greater for 50% initial solids cases than for 70%
initial solids. In any of the double nip cases where only between nip sticking was
observed, there is probably no cause for concern relative to potential applications, since
such sticking would likely promote improved heat transfer in the between nip section.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
150
Proiect F041
Status Report
Fig. 1. Drying Rate (based on Nip Time ) for Bleached,
70 gsm, 50 % Initial Solids Samples, 20 ms/nip
E,
8000
I-*
149 C, 1 nip
I+232
C, 1 nip
I+
149 C, 2 nips
1-E
232 C, 2 nips
I
6000
5000
3
4000
.Ip
6
3000
2000
1000
0
IO
100
1000
Nominal Peak Pressure, psi
1
Fig. 2. Final Solids for Bleached, 70 gsm Samples
50% Nominal Initial Solids, 20 ms/nip
--n-+-
232 C, 1 nip
149 C, 2 nips
60
50
IO
100
1000
Nominal Peak Pressure, psi
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
151
Project F041
Status Report
Fig. 3. Drying Rate (based on Nip Time) for Linerboard,
50 % Initial Solids, 20 mship
205 gsm,
8000
E 7000
5
6000
:
5000
PC
: 4000
-Cl-
2
3000
l5
2000
232 C, 1 nip
0
10
100
1000
Nominal Peak Pressure, psi
1
Fig. 4. Drying Rate (based on Nip Time) for Linerboard, 205 gsm,
70 % Initial Solids, 20 mship
5
$
2000
0
IO
100
1000
Nominal Peak Pressure, psi
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
152
Project F041
Status Report
Table 1. Bleached 70 gsm Samples: Degree of Sticking
Degree of
Stickinq
varied
edge
varied
50%
50
50
Peak
Pressure
IO psi
100
1000
1
1
50
50
50
232
232
232
IO
100
1000
6257
8439
9673
severe
very slight
slight
2
2
2
50
50
50
149
149
149
IO
100
1000
3663
3605
4760
moderate
between hits
between hits
2
2
2
50
50
50
232
232
232
IO
100
1000
5077
5818
6890
none
between hits
none
1
70
149
IO
2961
varied
1
70
232
IO
3740
none
2
70
149
IO
2183
none
2
70
232
10
2775
none
1
Nominal
Initial Solids
Drying Rate
ka/h/sq m
4290
6610
6769
Surface
Temperature
149 c
149
149
nips
1
1
1
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
153
Project F041
Table 2. Linerboard:
nips
Nominal
Initial Solids
50%
50
50
Surface
Temperature
149 c
149
149
Status Report
Degree of Sticking
Peak
Pressure
IO psi
100
1000
Drying Rate
ka/h/sq m
2069
3198
4082
Degree of
Sticking
severe
moderate
mod/sev
1
1
50
50
50
232
232
232
10
100
1000
3321
5385
7238
none
slight/mod
hi severe*
2
2
2
50
50
50
149
149
149
10
100
1000
1800
2218
4506
slight
varied
severe
2
2
2
50
50
50
232
232
232
IO
100
1000
3076
3687
6258
slight
severe
severe*
70
70
70
149
149
149
IO
100
1000
1412
2381
2628
none
varied
varied
70
70
70
232
232
232
IO
100
1000
2442
4421
3267
none
very slight
varied
2
2
2
70
70
70
149
149
149
10
100
1000
1102
1531
2382
none
none
varied
2
2
2
70
70
70
232
232
232
IO
100
1000
2320
2578
2938
none
none
between hits
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
*1 of 10
blistered
*most shts
blistered
154
Project FO41
CONCEPT
DEVELOPMENT
Status Report
ISSUES AND PLANS
The work to date has likely generatedmore questions than answers. Hopefully, it has also
given some initial support for the value and direction of this project.
The following list, which is neither complete nor prioritized, is intended to give an idea of
the types of issues that need to be addressedas the project goes on. Work in the coming
period to refine the concept presentedhere will be guided by these issues and questions.
Number of shoe press nips per cylinder vs. length of nips
Number of cylinders vs. size of cylinders
Ratio of total nip length to total contact length
Temperature-pressuretradeoffs (drying rate and paper properties aspects)
Vapor removal requirements
Clothing issues and desirable characteristics (interaction with sheet surface properties,
sheet restraint strategies, operating temperatures, vapor removal, etc.)
Equipment issues and limitations (including technical and economic impacts of
mechanical pressureand surface temperature levels, etc.)
Heat sources
Paper properties impacts
Fillers and additives impacts
Economic issues, tradeoffs and feasibility
PROPOSED NEW PROJECT TASK: Development/Verification
of a Model
of the PAPRICAN
High Intensity (Impingement) Dryer Concept
It is quite well known that PAPRICAN is active in the development of a ‘high intensity
dryer’ concept (although they are not necessarily using the same definition as given in this
report) involving impingement heat transfer to the sheeton a large diameter cylinder. The
work is focused on drying of printing grades. Recently, they initiated communication with
IPST regarding potential collaboration on one aspect of this work (development and
verification of a computer model of the concept, which would be useful for scale-up, etc.).
Since such collaboration could provide a way to gain understanding of the merits and
potential of impingement techniques in the dryer section, it would seem compatible with the
other aspectsof this DFRC project. A proposal for moving forward in this endeavor has
been prepared (see APPENDIX A). Feedback from the Papermaking PAC on this
proposed work would be appreciated.
REFERENCES
1. Ahrens, F., Kartsounes, G. and D. Ruff, “A Laboratory Study of Hot-Surface Drying
at High Temperature and Mechanical Loading”, PULP & PAPER CANADA
85(3):T63-67 (March 1984).
2. Ahrens, F. and Astrom, A., “High-Intensity Drying of Paper”, DRYING
TECHNOLOGY 4(2): 245-270 (1986).
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
155
Project FO41
Proposed Interaction
Status Report
APPENDIX
A
with PAPRICAN in the Area of High Intensity Drying
F. Ahrens,
Water Removal
Unit, IPST
The purposes of this document are: to present an opportunity for a limited (but significant)
interaction between IPST and PAPRICAN in an area of mutual activity (high intensity
drying processes)and to outline an approach to implementing this interaction that provides
benefits to both of our organizations (and their memberships). An overall Proposed Path
Forward is also provided.
Background
There are several background points that contribute to this opportunity and/or to its value:
PAPRICAN is working on a “high intensity dryer” concept involving inserting
larger than conventional diameter steam cylinders (e.g., one or two), fitted with
hot air impingement hoods, at selected points in the dryer section (for printing
grades). The sheet is believed held to the dryer surface by adhesion rather than
by fabric tension. In essence,the configuration is that of a Yankee dryer. A
major purpose is to achieve a large increase in drying rate. They will begin
evaluating the concept on their new medium/high-speed pilot machine this year.
l
l
Several supplier companies (Beloit, ABB, Valmet) are promoting various ways
of introducing impingement units into the dryer section, as well.
IPST has initiated a DFRC project (F041) in July 1999 on “Extending High
Intensity Water Removal Principles into the Paper Machine Dryer Section.”
The scope of this project is currently broader than that of the PAPRICAN
project (i.e., it is not limited to use of impingement techniques). In spite of that,
it would be desirable to gain accessto the PAPRICAN work and, more
generally, to develop a better understanding of the potential and the limitations
of impingement techniques in the dryer section.
l
At the recent (5 Jan. 2000) ‘IPST Forum,’ one of the highly rated areasfor
IPST improvement in the new decade was “improving interactions with our
sister organizations” (of which PAPRICAN is an important one).
The author has extensive experience in computer modeling of the Yankee dryer
(for towel and tissue machine applications). The author’s current model is
based on fundamental heat and mass transfer equations, together with various
empirical correlations developed from published (non-proprietary) information.
However, the model would likely require some modification to make it better
suited to simulation of the drying of printing grades. In particular, the variation
of sheet temperature and moisture in the z-direction can be (and was) neglected
for tissue drying, but these variations should be included in modeling the
behavior of heavier grades. Also. some of the empirical correlations used in the
model may need to be adjusted.
l
Most importantly, Dr. Ivan Pikulik (responsible for the PAPRICAN project)
has approachedthe author with the question as to whether the author would be
able to work with PAPRICAN in applying/adapting the Yankee dryer model to
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
156
Project F041
Status Report
the evaluation of their high intensity dryer concept and its further development
and application. Part of the effort would be to use data from trials with the pilot
machine high intensity dryers to verify and tune the computer model. A copy of
Dr. Pikulik’s initial e-mail inquiry is in the Attachment. According to that email, it appearsthat the PAPRICAN management is inclined to be favorable to
the proposed interaction. A subsequente-mail, received in early January of this
year, reaffirms the PAPRICAN interest in pursuing this interaction. Apparently,
they do not currently have accessto a suitable model, and cannot justify
developing one of their own ‘from scratch.’ Dr. Pikulik has expressed interest
in having long term direct accessto the version of the model resulting from the
proposed collaboration.
Proposed Approach
In view of the background presented, it seems that there is a sound basis for mutually
beneficial cooperative work in development of a computer simulation of the PAPRICAN
high intensity hryer concept. The proposed approach would include the following steps:
l
l
l
l
l
Initial meeting at PAPRICAN to review the current Yankee dryer model, to
inspect the pilot machine dryers, to establish requirements for the proposed high
intensity dryer model, and to develop a more detailed project scope and timing.
Create an initial high intensity impingement dryer computer model that is
incorporates useful portions of the current Yankee dryer model, but is focused
on the PAPRICAN application. Some of the new features believed needed
were mentioned in the Background section. It is proposed that this work
would be considered part of the DFRC F041 project. It is expected
that this step would take about one man-month of effort.
Conduct pilot machine trials at PAPRICAN to provide data sufficient for
verification and tuning of the model. It is expected that this experimental work
would be performed and paid for by PAPRICAN. However, the author would
participate in planning the trials.
Use the experimental data to verify and tune the model. This would likely be a
joint effort, with the model tuning being done by the author.
Make the model user-friendly, and train the PAPRICAN team in its use.
Expected Benefits
For IPST and its members, the potential benefits of this work include:
l
A deliverable (validated computer model) would be produced that could be made
available to interested member companies. The model would be structured in a general
way, to make it useful for scale-up and investigation of design variations. As a result,
the model could later be applied/adaptedto the evaluation of the impingement ideas
being promoted by the various equipment suppliers.
l
Access to the PAPRICAN pilot machine dryer system and associatedperformance data.
The extent of this would have to be negotiated.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F041
157
Status Report
Establishment of working relationships that could lead to additional cooperation in the
water removal area. For example, if work on Project F041at IPST produces promising
concepts beyond impingement, they could potentially be evaluated within the
PAPRICAN pilot machine dryer system in the future.
l
For PAPRICAN and its members:
l
Availability of a validated computer model that adequately simulates their high intensity
drying concept, without having to fully pay for its development.
l
Long term accessto the model so that they can apply it to the design and economic
assessmentof future (commercial) installations. The form of this accesswould have to
be negotiated.
l
Hopefully, establishment of working relationships with IPST that could lead to
additional beneficial cooperation in the water removal area.
Proposed Path Forward
The following steps appear to be needed prior to beginning the proposed work:
l
l
l
l
l
l
IPST management reviews this proposal and approves proceeding to next step
(completed 21 Jan. 2000)
Papermaking PAC F041 Subcommittee reviews this proposal (Jan. 2000)
Initial meeting with PAPRICAN to develop more detailed scopeandtiming (Feb. 2000)
Papermaking PAC reviews scope of proposed interaction (Mar. 2000)
Veda Christmas (Legal) and Marsha Gill (Contracts) develop appropriate agreements
with PAPRICAN (Mar. 2000)
PAPRICAN and IPST reach final agreement and proceed with the work (April 2000).
Acknowledgement: Thanks to David White for encouragement and for helpful
comments on a draft of this proposal.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
158
Project F041
Attachment:
Status Report
e-mail from I. Pikulik
From:
[email protected]
To:
[email protected]
cc:
[email protected],
[email protected], jrogers @paprican.ca
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 17:07:45 -0500
Subject: Cooperation on modeling high-intensity drying
Dear Fred,
During the Engineering Conference I told you that we would be very interested in
using your Yankee simulation model to evaluate the drying rate during
High-Intensity drying (HID) of printing papers. I have checked with Paprican
management, and there is no objection to us establishing a co-operation on a
project of our mutual interest. At this time I am not sure what form would could
take such a co-operation.
Presently, our pilot paper machine is in the start-up phase. By the end of the
year we intend to start up the dryer section, consisting of two HID units. One
of machines first tasks will be further to develop the HID technique and to
demonstrate these units at commercial speeds. Our dryers are highly
instrumented - much more than any commercial installation. This will allow us
to examine the effects of various parameterson drying rates, paper quality and
energy efficiency. This might be an excellent opportunity for you to verify your
model. We might gain a tool to estimate the effect of an HID installed in a
commercial machine, before the decision about such an installation is made. Can
we find on this basis a room for co-operation?
Perhapsit would be useful to meet and to discuss these possibilities in more
details. Perhaps the PAPTEC Paper Week held in Montreal at the end of Janu,ary,
beginning of February 2000 would be a good opportunity for such a meeting.
Friday morning of that week we might demonstrate the machine for various visitors and it might be an opportunity to seeit in action.
Ivan Pikulik
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
159
DRYING PRODUCTIVITY
STATUS REPORT
FOR
PROJECT F021
Fred Ahrens (PI)
Tim Patterson (PI)
Hiroki Nanko
Yulin Deng
Shana Mueller
Marcos Abazeri
March 8 - 9,200O
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia
IPST Confidential
Information
- Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
160
Project F021
Status Report
161
DUES-FUNDED
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project
Title:
DRYING PRODUCTIVITY
Project
PAC:
Number:
F021
PAPERMAKING
Project
PAC
Staff
Principal
Investigators:
Co-Investigators:
Research
Support
Staff:
F. Ahrens/T.
Patterson
H. Nanko, Y. Deng
S. Mueller,
M. Abazeri
Subcommittee
Reese,
Time
as Matching
Funds:
70%
Allocation:
Principal
Investigators:
Co-Investigators:
Research
Support
Staff:
Supporting
Research:
Students:
External
(Where
RESEARCH
Beck
$141,000
FY 99-00 Budget:
Allocated
Worry,
Matching
25%
10%
50%
Is Used):
None
Project
4253 (DOE-$400,000)
LINUROADMAP:
Line 7 - Increase paper machine productivity by 30% over ‘97 levels via focus on
breakthrough forming, dewatering, and drying concepts [faster drying and improved
runnability/quality]
PROJECT
OBJECTIVE:
Understand and reduce the impediments (e.g., picking/sticking, surface deposits, cockle,
sheet sealing) to the use of higher surface temperatures in the first dryer section.
Provide fundamental knowledge and tools needed to design new technologies that will
allow ultra high speed web transfer.
PROJECT
BACKGROUND:
Project F021 was connected to DOE Project 4253 in Oct. 1998. 70% of F021 funding
represents cost share to DOE project.
MILESTONES:
0
0
Establish baselines on current operations:
0
Drying strategies and problems [Ql, FY 99-001
0
Roll/dryer can contamination/topology [Q3, FY 99-001
Develop experimental equipment:
Contamination Test Stand (CTS) [Q3, FY 99-001
0
Web Adhesion and Drying Simulator (WADS) [Q3, FY 99-001
l
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
162
0
Status Report
Develop empirical data and models:
0
contamination
0
picking/adhesion
0
cockle
[Ql, FY 00-011
Develop
and verify web transfer model for high speed machine
[Q3, FY 00-011
Develop/evaluate:
0
surface conditioning
l
improved
operation
technologies
drying strategies
[Q4, FY 00-011
DELIVERABLES:
Summary
of baseline
Experimental
information
equipment:
[Q4, FY 99-001
CTS and WADS
[Q3, FY 99-001
Understanding
and data on factors influencing
deposits/contamination
[Ql, FY 00-011
Dryer section
contamination
Surface
conditioning
Web transfer
STATUS
operating
problems
strategies relative to picking/sticking,
[Q3, FY 00-011
technologies
cockle,
cockle,
and surface
and surface
[Q4, FY 00-011
model for high speed operation
OF GOALS
picking/sticking,
[Q3, FY 00-011
FOR FY 99-00:
Summarize and analyze the Questionnaire
results to guide project work and to
characterize
the opportunity for improved productivity by grade
[further analysis put on hold at Fall ‘99 PAC mtg.]
Collect meaningful surface contamination
[complete for 3 grades]
and topological
data from mills
Design, construct and debug a Web Adhesion and Drying Simulator for use in
investigating
effect of sheet and drying conditions on sticking and picking
[complete]
Design and construct a Contamination
Test Stand for use in providing
contaminated
surface coupons for use in the WADS
[complete; working out contamination
procedures]
Use WADS to quantify sticking/picking
[trial plan in place; ready to begin]
for clean and contaminated
Investigate the extent to which drying-related
variables influence
collaboration with the Project FO20 team]
[first trial complete]
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
model
surfaces
cockle [in
163
Project F021
Status Report
FY 99-00
Task
Summarize/analyze Questionnaire
results
Collect dryer
contamination/topology info.
Develop experimental equipmt:
WADS, CTS
Web adhesion/picking experiments
Cockle experiments
Develop web transfer model
Develop/evaluate improved drying
strategies
Develop/evaluate surface
conditioning technologies
SUMMARY
Ql
Q2
Q3
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
FY 00-01
Q4 Ql
7.
Q2 Q3
Q4
X
X
X
X
,
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OF RESULTS:
Questionnaire
results indicated that picking/sticking,
surface
deposits,
and
cockle are believed to be the biggest problems influenced by drying strategy in the
first dryer section, and confirmed that some degree of temperature
graduation is
used on most machines, regardless of grade.
Mill visits [conducted under Project 42531 have provided data on the nature and
extent of surface deposits on dryer cans, for three grades.
Contamination
Test Stand [designed and constructed under Project 42531 is now
available to provide model contaminated
surface coupons for use in the WADS.
The checkout and development
of experimentation
Adhesion and Drying Simulator is nearly complete.
sticking can begin (trial plan in place).
procedures for the Web
Investigation of picking and
Data on effect of drying variables (surface temperature,
applied pressure, fabric
design, proportion of drying under restraint, and heat flux uniformity) on cockle
severity have been obtained.
SUMMARY
l
0
OF KEY CONCLUSIONS:
The Questionnaire
results support
the value of Project F021
The Web Adhesion and Drying Simulator checkout process revealed that accurate
measurement
of the low level adhesion forces occurring under typical drying
conditions will require integrated analysis of tension data and video recordings of
the peel event
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F021
164
Status Report
The cockle results to date are consistent with (but do not yet prove) the statement
that high surface temperature in the first dryer section can aggravate cockle
problems
l
Non-uniform heat transfer (e.g., from surface deposits) was shown to increase
cockle severity.
Surface deposits problems appear to be prevalent in the first dryer section
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
165
Project F021
DISCUSSION
Topology
Status Report
and ADDITIONAL
of Dryer
DETAILS
Roll Surfaces
Significance
It is anticipated that the roughnessof underlying cast iron surface has a role in determining
the topology of contaminated surfaces and the amount of contaminant that deposits. These
relationships have as yet to be confirmed.
Results
Work reDorted at the fall’99 PAC
In previous work, reported at the fall 1999 Paper making PAC, we have made roughness
measurements on cleaned dryer cylinders from two mills making fine paper. For this
purpose, we utilized an epoxy material to obtain replicas of the surfaces. We utilized the
services of CyberMetrics to characterize the topology of these surfaces. They used a noncontact method to measure the one-dimensional roughness of the replicas. Analysis of the
results suggestedthat the surfaces on paper machine B were generally rougher than was
observed on paper machine C.
Work during this period
During this period we have extended our topological measurementsto include the cleaned
dryer cylinder surfaces from a paper machine making three-ply linerboard (designated
PHL) and a paper machine that produces medium (designated PHM). In addition, we have
also characterized the topology of curved cast iron coupons that are being used in our
laboratory experiments. These included two cases,coupons with a smooth finish
(designated CI (smooth)) and coupons that exhibited machining scratches (designated CI
(scratched)). Topology measurements were obtained from epoxy replicas for the linerboard
and medium machines while direct measurements were made on the cast iron coupons.
In an effort to’obtain more accurate data, we obtained both one and two-dimensional
roughness measurements. Figure 1 shows one-dimensional measurement of some key
roughness parameters for the earlier reported fine paper machines as well as the data from
the linerboard and medium paper machines and the laboratory coupons.
We observe that the topologies of B and PHL are similar and the topologies of C and PHM
are similar. We also observe that the smooth cast iron coupons show similar topological
characteristics to the linerboard machine and the scratchedcoupons are similar to the
medium machine.
Figure 2 shows the two dimensional measurements for the cast iron coupons as well as for
the linerboard and medium machines. We observe similarities between the coupons and the
commercial surfaces.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
166
Project FO2 1
Status Report
Conclusions
We haveshownthat the topologyof our curvedcastiron couponsis within the rangeof
topologiesobservedon commercialpapermachines.Hence,we may utilize thesecoupons
in future laboratoryexperiments.
Figures:
.l d
I
Rq
.
Ra
Topology
I
RqfRa
of Dryer
I
RP
One-Dimensional
Roll Surfaces
I
.
Rku
VW
I
Rz
.
Measures of Roughness
Figure 1. One Dimensional
Measurements
of Roughness
.
.
-
100 ‘3
Ia
.
CI(scratched)
PHL
PHM
10
1
.l
s;
s;
si
it
[Ssk] Sl;u
S;
Two-Dimensional
Figure 2. Two Dimensional
St&
Sh
Shl
&
Spk S;k
Measures of Roughness
Measurements
of Roughness
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Sbi
Sci
S;i
167
Project F021
Dryer
Roll Deposit
Status Report
Composition
Significance
It is anticipated that chemical deposition on dryer rolls can play a significant part in
reducing paper machine productivity and paper quality. Deposition of chemical
contaminants onto dryer roll can lead to sticking and picking which adversely impacts paper
surface properties and paper machine runnability. To reduce these effects, papermakers
routinely reduce dryer roll temperatures, which negatively impact machine productivity.
Contamination is often found to be non-uniformly deposited on dryer cylinders. These
non-uniform deposits can lead to non-uniform heat transfer, which may lead to paper
defects such as cockle. Ultimately we wish to be able to determine the adverse economic
impact of dryer deposits and to develop technologies to reduce these chemical depositions
and their impact.
Results
Work reported at the fall’99 PAC
Samples of deposits were taken from the surface of dryer cylinders from two commercial
fine paper machines. Our purpose was to estimate the range of contaminant loading and
identifying the chemical composition of the deposits. We found that contaminant loading on
paper machine B ranged from 3.8 g/m2 to 8.7 g/m2, and that on paper machine C was fro m
0.01 g/m2 to 1.4 g/m . We observed that the contamination was uniformly deposited on
each cylinder of paper machine B and was deposited in MD streaks on cylinders of paper
machine C.
The primary purpose in characterizing the chemistry of the deposits was to develop a model
contaminant mixture for future laboratory experiments. The work at this early stage was
primarily qualitative. A battery of tests including wet chemical analysis, inorganic elemental
analysis and microscopy were conducted. On both machines we observed large amounts of
fiber and fines, latex, starch, kaolin clay, titanium dioxide and calcium carbonate. In some
caseswe also found smaller amounts of glue, styrene, talc, and rust.
An attempt was made to also characterize the surface energy of the collected deposits. For
this purpose, samples of deposits from each cylinder were compacted and formed into flat
surfaced pellets. The contact angle (water) of deposits from paper machine B ranged from
75’ to 78O,while that from paper machine C ranged from 98’ to 115’. For comparison we
measured the contact angle of clean cast iron as 77’.
Work during this period
.
The focus of work during this period was on characterizing the deposits that were sampled
from the surfaces of dryer cylinders of a linerboard machine and a medium machine.
General Background
The linerboard machine used a double felted first press and a double felted Beloit extended
nip second press followed by a smoothing press. The Black Clawson dryer section was
configured such that the bottom dryer cylinders (even numbered) were without dryer
fabrics while the top dryer cylinders (odd numbered) had dryer fabrics. Doctors were
located at the end of each dryer section. Hence, cylinders 5, 17, 3 1,43, 55,67 were
doctored.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
168
Project F02 1
Status Report
The linerboard that is produced is three-ply with 50% OCC and 50% Virgin Kraft in the
middle ply. A small amount of recycle is in the side of the liner that is in contact with the
top dryer cylinders, while the bottom cylinders contact the side of the liner that is 100%
Virgin Kraft.
The mill reports the use of the following chemicals in the manufacture of the linerboard;
Alum, Sulfuric Acid, a defoamer (Callaway 8514 supplied by Calloway Chemical
Company, Columbus Georgia), and felt cleaners (feltECCel23 1,455, and 465 supplied bY
ECC International, and TWI C505 supplied by The Way, Metairie, Louisiana),
The mill reports picking problems only when the steam pressureis increased in the first
dryer section. Cockle problems have not been reported.
Typically they do not clean the dryer cylinders. When there is a break they will use caustic
on the dryer fabrics. Also, once a month they spray Fast Foam (a commercial caustic) on
all parts of the machine and then rinse with water.
The dryers on the medium machine are configured into four sections. The first section
includes cylinders 1 through 9. The top cylinders (odd numbered) in the first section were
all doctored. A single dryer fabric wraps each of the cylinders in the first section. In later
sections, separatetop and bottom dryer fabrics are utilized. Dryer cylinders 10, 12, 14,
23, 37, and 51 are doctored.
Chemicals utilized in the manufacture of medium include a defoamer (Callaway 8514), a
wetting agent (Callaway 5507), and felt cleaners (feltECCe123 1,455, and 465 and TWI
C505).
Dryer Cylinder Surface Temperatures
Dryer temperature surveys were conducted by the mill on the linerboard machine in Otto ber
of 1999 while it was producing 42# liner and on the medium machine in August of 1999
while it was producing 26# medium. Surface deposits were collected by IPST during
shutdowns in November of 1999. Average infrared surface temperatures are shown in
Figures 1 and 2.
Dryer Cylinder Deposit Loading
During machine shutdowns, we scrapped a one square foot area of some of the cylinder
surfacesto determine deposition loading, deposit chemistry and underlying cylinder
topology. The deposit loading results are shown in Figures 3 and 4. We took samples in
the first dryer section on the linerboard machine and found a range of loading from 1.2
g/m2 to 6.5 g/m2. We took our samples later on in the drying process on the medium
machine as the area around cylinder 16 showed particularly heavy contamination.
Unfortunately, the region of greatestcontamination on cylinder 16 was not close enough to
the catwalk for us to safely obtain a scrapping of a fixed area. As a result we do not have a
measurement of loading on cylinder 16. We were able to obtain a sample for chemical
analysis and estimate the thickness of the deposit to be of the order of a sixteenth of an
inch.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
169
Project F02 1
Status Report
Dryer Cylinder Deposit Chemistry
Samples of the deposits from the liner and medium machine were analyzed by IPST
research services. The weight percent of various organic and inorganic components are
shown in Figures 5 and 6.
Figure 5, for the linerboard machine, shows that Polyvinyl Acetate was a main component
of the deposit on cylinder 1 while it was absent on cylinders 2 and 4. This is consistent
with the fact that cylinder 1 was in contact with a side.of the sheet that contained OCC
while cylinders 2 and 4 were in contact with a side that contained 100% Virgin Kraft. In
contrast, we observe a high concentration of calcium carbonate and silicates on cylinders 2
and 4 while these are in much lower concentration on cylinder 1.
Figure 6, for the medium machine, shows a high concentration of Styrene-Butadiene in the
sample from cylinder 16. This component is absent from cylinders 22 and 26. Similar to
the linerboard results, we observe high concentrations of silicates in the samples from
cylinders 22 and 26.
The styrene-butadiene could be coming from pressure sensitive adhesivesbrought in by
waste materials, 20-3O%OCC, used in making up the medium furnish.
Conclusions
The loading and chemical composition data should give us sufficient information to
establish model contaminant mixtures for each of the three grades. Once we have defined
these models we can use them to develop an understanding of the deposition process and
allow us an opportunity to prepare contaminated coupons for adhesion and picking
experiments on the laboratory web adhesion and drying simulator (WADS).
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Status Report
170
Project F021
Fig u res: Dryer Roll Deposit Composition
Paper Machine
Note: Deposition samples were taken from cylinders
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Cylinder
Figure 1. Average
Surface
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Temperature
for Dryer Cylinder
Machine Making Linerboard
on the Commercial
Note: Deposition samples were taken from cylinders
11’1’1’1”‘1’1’1’1”‘1’1’1’11”111’1””11”’11’1’111”111a’1111”
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Cylinder
Figure 2. Average
1,2, and 4
75
80
Order
Paper
Paper Machine
50
PHL
45
50
55
60
PHM
16,22, and 26
“1”11”11’1
65
70
75
Order
Surface Temperature
for Dryer Cylinder
Machine Making Medium
on the Commercial
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Paper
80
171
Project F02 1
Status Report
Paper Machine
PHL
8
7
Cylinder Number
Figure 3. Deposit
Loading for Dryer Cylinders on the Commercial
Linerboard
Paper Machine
Making
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
26
22
.
Figure 4. Deposit
Cylinder Number
Loading for Dryer Cylinders on the Commercial
Medium
Paper Machine
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Making
172
Project F02 1
100
-
75
n Tacky Polymer - Mostly Polyvinyl Acetate
q Wood Fiber
q Misc. Including Starch, Felt Fibers, Hard Plastics
q Solvent Extractable Hydrocarbons
0
I
I
I
Status Report
q
q
q
I
Polystyrene
Calcium Carbonate
Silicates Including Clay
Rust
Paper Machine PHL
I
50’
I
I
25 I
0*
2
Cylinder Number
Figure 5. Composition
100
of Deposits from Dryer Cylinders
Making Linerboard
on the Commercial
Paper Machine
- Paper Machine PHM
Wood Extractives (Resin & Fatty Acids)
75 -
I
I
d
10
Rust
I
503
25 -
16
22
26
Cylinder Number
Figure 6. Composition
of Deposits
from Dryer Cylinders
Making Medium
on the Commercial
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Paper Machine
I
173
Project F02 1
Status Report
Web Adhesion and Drying Simulator (WADS)
Project F02 1 was initiated in order to study methods of increasing paper machine
productivity by using high temperatures in the first dryer section. Currently, the use of
elevated temperatures is limited by various interactions between the paper and drying roll
surfaces which cause picking/sticking of the web. Furthermore, contamination of the
dryer roll surfaces may have an effect on the degree of picking/sticking. A review of the
relevant literature has revealed that no quantitative analysis of this problem has been
undertaken. A Web Adhesion and Drying Simulator (WADS) was thus designed and
constructed (via Project 4253 funding) to better understand the mechanisms behind the
picking/sticking phenomena so that solutions can be developed to increase product
quality and paper mill productivity.
The WADS unit provides a direct measure of the peel force under simulated dryer
conditions. Through the use of the Mardon equation shown below, the peel force can be
correlated to the Work of Adhesion [ 11.
Tf-
W11
- I-co@
T’
=
+ mv,’
Tension (g/cm)
W” =Work of Adhesion (g/cm)
m = Mass per unit area (g/cm2)
VI= Velocity (cm/s)
4 = Peel Angle
The Work of Adhesion is a more fundamental parameter which depends on a number of
factors including surface topology, surface materials, surface energy, contaminants, fiber
characteristics, application pressure, surface and sheet temperature, and moisture content.
Picking/sticking occurs when the adhesion between the web and the dryer roll surface is
of the same order of magnitude as the cohesion of the web. By characterizing the work
of adhesion, ways of preventing and reducing picking/sticking can be determined.
WADS Unit
The WADS system, shown below in Figure 1, consists of a belt driven flywheel to which
a removable cast-iron “coupon” is attached. The coupon can first be installed in the
Contamination Test Stand (CTS) to acquire a layer of surface contamination, and then
can be transferred to the WADS system for peel testing. Therefore, the WADS can be
used to test the effect of surface conditions, particularly contamination, on the peel force
and work of adhesion. Various surface materials and surface treatments can be
investigated as well.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
174
Project F02 1
Status Report
Figure 1: WADS Unit
Web Adhesion
and
Drying
Simulator
SAMPLE
TRAY
PEEL
AKE-UP
TENSION
ROLL
END OF CYCLE
PRO XIMITY
SENSOR
START
PROXIMITY
OF
CYCLE
SENSOR--/
Unlike Mardon’s sheet stripper apparatus [2], the WADS has the ability to control and
vary the surface temperature which is necessary in order to simulate realistic dryer roll
conditions. A range of peel angles, peel velocities, web application pressure (controlled
by belt tension), and dwell times are available. The sample inlet (web) temperature,
which plays a role in the degree of sticking, can also be adjusted.
During an experiment, the coupon makes one revolution from its start position at a set
peel speed. The dryer belt acts to laminate the web (pulled in from the sample tray) onto
the coupon as it makes its way around the wheel. The speed of the wheel and length of
this dryer belt, both user specified parameters, determine the dwell time. In addition, web
application pressure is adjusted with the belt tension. After passing through the
applicator section, the paper is pulled from the coupon at the specified peel angle and
peel point with a length of tape that is tracked over the tension sensor. The sensor
records the peel force (tension) required to pull the paper from the coupon. Upon
completion of the peel event, a proximity sensor triggers the brake. The data acquisition
program collects the peel speed, tension, belt application pressure, and coupon surface
temperature throughout the course of an experiment.
Initial experiments on the WADS unit showed a significant level of noise with the tension
sensor. Viscoelastic vibration damper material was used to mechanically isolate the
frame which supports the sensor. In addition, a low pass filter was installed into the
system to electronically reduce noise. Static calibration of the sensor demonstrates that
readings are accurate within +/- 0.1 g. Dynamic tests show a consistent lg frictional drag
of the tape over the sensor apparatus which increases the tension output. This factor will
be incorporated into the data analysis to determine the real peel force.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
175
Project F02 1
Status Report
WADS Checkout Runs
Paper samples of a bleached pulp blend (75% BHWIU25%BSWK) were prepared in the
Formette for the development and testing of the WADS system. Linerboard samples
were also used for initial development becauseof its superior durability and sticking
ability. For preliminary runs, equipment settings are shown below in Table 1.
Table 1: Initial WADS Setup
Setting
Parameter
1
Peel Angles
60°, 45O,and 15’
Peel Speeds
50 fVmin & 150 ft/min (0.25 & 0.50 m/s)
Coupon Temperature 250 OF(121OC)
Sample Temperature approx. 150’ F (66 “C)
Application Pressure 0.47 psi (3240 Pa)
Dwell Time
0.271 s - 0.407 s (depending on speed)
I
A plot of tension vs. time for a typical experimental run using the bleached sample is
shown in Fig 2. There is a start-up and shutdown period of transience in each run before
and after the actual peel event which is indicated by the arrows.
Figure 2: Typical Experimental Run (Tension vs. Time)
Bleached Wet Paper: Raw Data of Tension vs Time
8
7
6
0
1
2
3
Time (s)
4
5
6
l/6/00
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
176
Project F02 1
Status Report
Figure 3: Extracted Peel Event (Tension vs. Time)
Bleached Wet Paper: Tension vs Time
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
Time
2.8
3
3.2
(s)
l/6/00
For the data analysis, the actual peel event, shown in Fig. 3, is extracted from the raw
data file (which records a user specified number of points and sampling rate). For the
preliminary runs, extraction of the peel event was difficult becausethere was no time
stamp in the data showing the onset and end of the peel. A method of extraction was
found while performing the simulated experiments (as explained in the next section) and
was used on previously gathered data.
The data must be corrected for various factors including zero value, paper/tape weight
and friction. During an experiment, the tape is being retracted and the paper sample is
being added as the paper sample is pulled off the coupon. These two factors contribute to
the tension sensor output and must be accounted for when determining the actual peel
tension. Given the constant speed of the paper sample around the wheel, a linear function
describes the change in weight of the paper (and tape) sample. The resulting weight is
subtracted from the tension value to give the peel tension. The contribution of friction
mentioned earlier must also be accounted for in the final data analysis.
Initial results revealed problems with producing adequate sticking to the clean coupon
surface. A study was done to correlate solids content with optimal sticking for the
bleached Formette sheets. Results showed similar sticking behavior for a range of inlet
solids content, 30.60%. Tension values appearedto be quite low, in the 0.5-3.0 g range,
making it very difficult to assessequipment performance. Setup conditions were
modified to maximize sticking by moving to low angles and intermediate temperatures.
However, only minor improvement was observed.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
177
Project F02 1
Status Report
Simulated Runs
In order to verify equipment capability and understand the peel, simulated experiments
were performed using dry paper (copy and blotter paper). By using double-sided tape on
the coupon, an artificial sticky surface was created. Video documentation was made of
each run in order to correlate the data with the actual peel event.
A number of important observations resulted from these simulated tests. First of all, at
higher peel angles, frame-by-frame video analysis showed that the actual peel angle
varied greatly from set point. For example, for a peel angle of 60”, the actual angle
ranged from 18’-24’. This is primarily due to the fact that the paper does not peel from
the coupon surface at a sharp angle. Rather, there is some curvature due to lack of
adhesion and inherent stiffness of the paper creating this discrepancy. Since the peel
angle is required in the Mardon Equation to solve for work of adhesion, an accurate angle
measurement is necessary. Similar results were observed by Mardon who found that at
set points of 90°, the actual angle was about 45’ [3]. He used a Fastex camera to account
for the actual angle in the calculations. For the WADS system, the implication is that
videotaping of each run is necessaryto record accurate peel angles. The Mardon
equation must then be applied locally for each discrete point.
In addition, the actual peel event can be extracted by using the drop in the speed signal as
shown in Fig.4. The motor cut off is triggered by a proximity sensor at which time the
speed signal begins to drop. The distance between the sensor and the peel point allows
the start time of the peel to be determined. The length of the peel is simply based on the
linear speed and length of paper sample. This method of analysis proved to be highly
accurate in locating the actual peel event, with the start time varying only +/- 0.02s.
Recently, another proximity sensor has been added to the system in order to provide a
measure of the exact time at which the peel event takes place.
Figure 4 : Speed Signal Drop
Bleached Wet Paper: Speed & Tension vs Time
6
Time(s)
l/6/00
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
178
Project F02 1
Status Report
Tension and peel angle data collected using this method were used in the Mardon
equation to calculate the work of adhesion. A plot of the work of adhesion is shown in
Figure 5. Units of work are shown in g/cm which is numerically approximately the same
as the SI units of J/m2 (0.98 conversion factor).
Figure 5 : Work of Adhesion during the Peel Event
Work
of Adhesion
vs Time
: Dry
Paper
on Sticky
Surface
5
4.5
3.5
0.5
0
I
6 .lO
I
6.20
6.30
6.40
6.50
Time
6.60
6.70
6.80
6.90
(s)
Figure 6 is a video image of an actual peel event for one of the dry paper runs. Tension
values of IO-40g , significantly higher than with the wet paper on the clean coupon, were
found with the tape runs.
Figure 6 : Video Image of Peel Event
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
179
Project F02 1
Picking/Sticking
Status Report
Experiments
The first part of the WADS testing involves clean coupon measurements of tension and a
characterization of the work of adhesion at a range of speeds,coupon and sample
temperatures, and dwell times. Initial experiments were used to verify and define the
operating range of the WADS equipment. Currently, the dwell time has a range from
0.14s to 1.20s. The speed can likewise be varied from 25ft/min to approximately 200
Nmin. While the WADS does not provide peel speedssimilar to actual paper machines,
it does nevertheless provide dwell times in the range of the paper-to-dryer contact times
at real machine speed. Consequently, the picking/sticking data can be expected to be
highly meaningful.
In addition to determining work of adhesion, another goal of this work is to quantitatively
describe the picking/sticking phenomena. Previous work by Meinecke [4] showed that
the degree of picking depends on surface temperature, peel speed (dwell time) and inlet
solids. However, the amount of picking was not quantified nor was it related to the work
of adhesion. The WADS, on the other hand, should be capable of providing data for a
quantitative map relating the regions of greatest picking/sticking. A detailed procedure is
being developed in order to collect and measure the amount of picking. A qualitative
visual rating will also be used.
The Clean Coupon experiments will employ the following conditions:
I ~~
Parameter
Coupon Surface Temperature
Dwell Time
Initial Sheet Temperature
Initial Sheet Solids
Peel Speed
Peel Angle
Paper Type
Setting
194’ F, 248OF, 302’ F 1(90°C, 120° c, 150° C)
0.17s 0.5 s
100’ F (38 “C), 150’ F (66°C)
40%, 50%, 60%
50 ft/min, 150 ft/min (0.25 & 0.50 m/s)
fixed at 30 degrees
Copy Paper and Liner Board
I
Once these experiments are complete, contaminated coupons from the CTS can be
installed on the WADS to test the effect of surface condition on work of adhesion as well
as on picking/sticking. The same conditions as those listed above will be analyzed.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
I
I
Project F02 1
180
Status Report
References
1. Mardon, J., “The Release of Wet Paper Webs from Various ‘Papermaking
Surfaces’,“APPITA, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 14-34. (July 1961)
2. Ibid
3. Mardon, J., “Theoretical and experimental investigations into the peeling of paper
webs from Solid Surfaces,” Paperi ja Pm, No. 11, pp.797.815 (1976)
4. Meinecke, A., Chau Huu, T., and Loser, H., “Neue Erkenntnisse iiber die
Papiertocknung mit Trocken-zylindern,” Das Papier, 42(10A), pp.159.165 (1988)
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
181
Project F02 1
Cockle
Status Report
Investigation
Background
One of the several reasonsgiven for the use of temperature graduation in the dryer section
(i.e., use of low temperatures in the first dryer section) is that heating/drying the sheet too
quickly can increase the likelihood/severity of cockle. Another problem associatedwith
high initial dryer temperatures is increased surface deposits. Since deposits can easily be
non-uniform, they are expected to contribute to cockle due to the associatednon-uniformity
of heat flux to the sheet.
Qualitative studies of the influence of initial moisture and heating non-uniformities on the
cockle developed in paper as a result of drying, were performed by Brecht, et al (1). A
discussion of some of the results is given in the paper by Gallay (2).
D. Coffin’s team has developed a technique to quantify the degreeof cockle in a paper
sample (shadow Moire technique), and applied it in initial experimental studies of the
factors believed to influence cockle [Project FO20]. Some of the factors investigated were
the degree of restraint during drying, formation uniformity, dryer surface temperature (over
a rather narrow range), pressing level and basis weight.
The capability of an existing dryer simulator has been upgraded to aid in conducting a
further investigation of the extent to which drying-related variables influence cockle. The
dryer simulator now has two heated surface options, a uniform cast iron platen and a cast
iron platen having a pattern of epoxy-filled depressionsto simulate non-uniform surface
deposits. The simulator offers control over surface temperature, dwell time, and restraint
pressure. Furthermore, the sheet can be lightly pressed against the hot surface with samples
of real dryer fabrics (which apply somewhat non-uniform pressure to the sheet).
Initial
Cockle Experiments
In keeping with the input from the Papermaking PAC, some new cockle experiments
relevant to Project F021 have been planned and executed, in collaboration with D. Coffin’s
team. The basic strategy developed for the trial is to generatesamples that have been dried
to various extents (in terms of moisture ratio) under selected conditions in the dryer
simulator (i.e., with some restraint), and to let the drying be completed via unrestrained air
drying. It was hypothesized that the amount of cockle in the final sheetswould be
dependent on the proportion of drying occuring in the simulator, as well as on the drying
conditions. The trial plan developed is as follows.
Trial Obiectives
.To quantify the effects of surface temperature and applied pressureon cockle
.To investigate the effect of heat flux non-uniformity on cockle
Experimental Plan
There are 4 parts to this trial: (1) generation of drying curves (i.e., moisture ratio vs. time)
to provide input to Parts 3 and 4; (2) control runs; (3) drying runs with uniform heat flux;
(4) drying runs with non-uniform heat flux.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F02 1
182
Status Report
Test Conditions:
Samples: These will be cut @“x5” squares)from some of the existing Formette
sheetsthat were initially made for use in WADS adhesion experiments:
l
70 gsm
l
75% BHWK/25% BSWK; with appropriate additives to simulate a copy paper
furnish (seeTable 1)
l
450 CSF
l
Tensile Ratio: about 2.0
l
Initial Solids Level: 45% (via pressing)
Table 1. Sheet additives.
1Additive
1 Amount
PCC
15% of dry weight
Optical Brightener
2 lbs./ton
3 Ibs ./ton
I
12 lbs./ton
Starch
Retention Aid
2 lbs ./ton
I
Part (1): Drying Curves:
l
Dwell time in dryer simulator: 10 levels, TBD
l
Surface temperature: 2 levels, 110 C and 170 C
l
Mechanical pressure: 0.2 psi and 1.0 psi [covering the range corresponding to
the pressurecreated by fabric tension on a dryer can]
Platens:
uniform surface and non-uniform surface
l
l
No. of runs per condition: 1
Part (2): Controls:
0
entirely air dried without restraint: 10 samples
0
completely dried with high restraint in the dryer simulator:
l
5 samples using uniform platen [for one combination of surface
temperature, mechanical pressure and fabric]
l
5 samples using non-uniform platen [for one combination of surface
temperature, mechanical pressure and fabric]
Part (3): Drying runs with uniform heat flux (uniform surface):
Final moisture ratio (for dryer simulator runs): 3 levels, about 0.7,0.3,0.1 g/g
l
l
Surface temperature: 2 levels, 110 C and 170 C {possibly one extra level at the
final moisture condition giving worst cockle}
l
Mechanical pressure: 0.2 psi and 1.0 psi
l
Dryer fabric: 2 fabric designs
l
Completion of drying after removal from dryer simulator: unrestrained air
drying in a 50% RH/22 C lab
No. of runs per condition: 5
l
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
183
Status Report
Part (4): Drying runs with non-uniform heat flux (non-uniform surface):
Final moisture ratio (for dryer simulator runs): 3 levels, about 0.7,0.3,0.1 g/g
Surface temperature: 2 levels, 110 C and 170 C
Mechanical pressure: 0.2 psi and 1.0 psi
Dryer fabric: one design
Completion of drying after removal from dryer simulator: unrestrained air
drying in a 50% RH/22 C lab
No. of runs per condition: 5
Test Runs:
Part (1): Trial and error (and consultation with F. Ahrens) should be used to select
about 10 different dwell times that define the moisture ratio vs. time curves over the range
from about 1.2 g/g down to about 0.05 g/g.
Parts (3) and (4): The drying curves will be used to determine the dwell times
needed to achieve the target moisture levels for the dryer simulator runs. The sheet and
fabric MD’s need to be aligned. After initial drying in the dryer simulator, to their
established moisture targets, the completion of the drying of samples will be done via air
drying without restraint, in a room at 50%RH/22 C.
Data Collection/Handling: Record all test conditions; give samples unique,
easily understood code designations; record initial and final (after dryer simulator) weights.
After the air drying (unrestrained) step is complete (24 hrs. at 50% RH), submit samples to
Kennisha Collins for cockle analysis. After cockle analysis, oven dry samples and calculate
initial and final (after dryer simulator) solids levels.
For Part (1), plot moisture ratio vs. time curves.
For the Part (2) control sheetsdried on the simulator, after cockle measurement at 50%
RH, expose sheetsto high humidity (95%) and again measure cockle.
Shadow Moir6 Measurements: From visual inspection pick the most cockled
and flattest sheets.Prepare Moire system for measurements (Clean dust from glass and
paperholder, use 50 lines per inch glass, make sure holder is flat, make sure light source i S
in working condition) Set the Moire system up to get the maximum x-y coverage and still
get reliable z measurements. It would be good to make measurements on a square area of 3
to 4 inches. Also make sure your window of interest has at least 200 pixels in each
direction. Once the camera is focused on the area to be measured do not change the settings
until all sheets are measured. First make sure that you get good measurements for the least
and most cockled sheets. Adjust as necessary. If the sheetsare very flat, consider taking a
second measurement using the 100 lines per inch plate. Measure all sheetswith the MD
direction facing the same way. Make sure that the distance between the glass and the paper
is the same for each measurement (i.e., move the holder to the same starting position each
time, without severely cockled sheetstouching the glass) By looking at a graph of the
height data make sure the image is reasonable(high frequency wrinkles or abrupt changes
indicate that poor fringe patterns were obtained). Analyze the raw data so that the height is
with respect to the best-fit plane (averageheight is zero). If the samples have curl, the low
frequency responsewill have to be filtered using FFT. Calculate the standard deviation of
the height, the average of the absolute value of the height, and the average gradient
squared.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
184
Project F021
Status Report
Results of Cockle Experiments
The drying runs have been completed for nearly all of the trial conditions. The cockle
analysis is in progress, but results for a portion of the trial conditions are given in Fig. 1.
1
The “cockle standarddeviation” is a measureof the sheet-averagedeviation of the cockled
co&l .eh
sheet surface topology from that of a flat sheet (i.e., a larger number implies greater
cockle). The “leaving moisture ratio” refers to the moisture in the sample upon removal
from the dryer simulator, prior to final air-drying. The data point at 1.22 g/g is a contra
control1
case,in which the samples (initially at 45% solids were entirely air-dried without restraint.
restraint.
Fig. 1. Cockle Standard
Deviation
Vs. Moisture
Leaving
Restrained
Drying
Phase [initial
MR
Ratio
=I-221
- -+-
d
6
- Uniform
Heating,1 10 C,
1 psi
Uniform
Heating, 170 C,
1 psi
- -& - - Nonuniform,
170 C, 1 psi
I
~~---~-.~~,-~-~.~..~,..
O-'
0
0.5
Leaving
W-N,
1
moisture
ratio,
ww
The results in Fig. 1 show several interesting features. Let us first consider the end points
at high and low moisture. The cockle associated with the 1.22 g/g control is, by definition,
not dependent on drying conditions. Instead, it probably reflects the effects of sheet
formation and basis weight non-uniformity. The end point at lowest moisture has a very
low cockle (i.e., corresponding to a flat sheet). This reflects the fact that the entire drying
occurred with the sheet under restraint.
The most interesting behavior is associatedwith the intermediate points. The cockle is seen
to be far greater in the intermediate region than at the ends, in spite of the fact that sheet was
restrained for a portion of the drying process! The general trends exhibited by the peak
values seem to be physically reasonable. That is, the uniform heating at higher temperature
results in more cockle than uniform heating at lower temperature. This result is consistent
with (but does not yet prove) the statement that high surface temperature in the first dryer
section can aggravate cockle problems. The peak for non-uniform heating (e.g.,
representing effects of non-uniform surface deposits) is seento further increase cockle.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F021
185
Status Report
The potential for shrinkage during (unrestrained) drying is a function of the moisture
change. Thus, one would expect cockle severity to be associatedwith moisture differences
(and levels) in the sheet at the beginning of the unrestrained drying period. Examples of the
free shrinkage behavior of paper (vs, moisture content) are contained in Refs. 3-6. Over the
range of sheet moistures occuring in the dryer section (e.g., 1.5 g/g down to about 0.05
g/g) the shrinkage function is quite non-linear, with most shrinkage occuring between 0.7
and 0.05 g/g.
The shape of the cockle vs. moisture ratio curves in Fig. 1 can, therefore, probably be
explained as the competition between two phenomena:
0 if the sample stays in the dryer longer (to lower moisture ratio) there is, on the average,
less shrinkage potential in the subsequentunrestrained drying phase, decreasing the
tendency for cockle.
0 if the sample stays in the dryer longer, the local moisture deviations may be greater at
the end of the restrained period, at least over part of the final moisture range, increasing
the tendency for cockle.
One other observation from the experiments seems notable. The sheetstended to exhibit a
small-scale “cockle” pattern matching the fabric pattern. This may be due to a fabric scale
non-uniformity in the heat and mass transfer processescreating fabric scale moisture
differences in the sheet.
Potential
Next Steps
The results to date appear to provide some new insights into the effects of drying
conditions. There would seem to be merit in continuing these collaborative cockle
investigations.
One direction to be considered is that of trying to more closely simulate the drying process
occuring in the dryer section. A sequenceof short heat input periods (in the dryer
simulator), with brief periods of unrestrained or unidirectionally restrained
evaporation/shrinkage in between, to simulate the open draws, could be performed.
Unfortunately, currently available laboratory drying devices are not sophisticated enough to
give a truly realistic simulation of the time-varying drying and restraint conditions
experienced by a sheet as it progressesthrough a typical dryer section. Development of a
more realistic, versatile laboratory simulator for the drying process could be undertaken, if
there is sufficient interest.
In any case, from the point of view of Project F021, the overall goal of future work in this
area should be directed toward:
l
Pinpointing the drying conditions and sources of non-uniform shrinkage in the
conventional process that create the greatestdegreeof sheet surface non-uniformity
l
Proposing and demonstrating strategies for reducing the cockle problem, that also
provide an increase in drying rate.
REFERENCES
1. Brecht, W., Muller, F., and H. Weiss, “Uber das ‘Blasigwerden’ von Papieren”, Das
Papier 9 (7/8): 133-142 (1955)
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)
Project F021
186
Status Report
2. Gallay, W., “Stability of Dimensions and Form of Paper”, Tappi J. 56 (12): 90-95
(1973)
3. Wahlstrom, T. and C. Fellers, “Biaxial Straining of Paper During Drying, Relations
Between Stresses, Strains and Properties”, Proceedings 1999 TAPPI Engineering
Conference, pp. 705-720
4. Wahlstrom, T., Adolfsson, K., &tlund, S. and C. Fellers, “Numerical Modelling of
the Shrinkage Profile in a Dryer Section, a First Approach”, Proceedings 1999 TAPPI
International Paper Physics Conference, pp. 5 17-531
5. Waller, M. and Singhal, A., “Development of Paper Properties During Restrained
Drying of Handsheets”, Proceedings 1999 TAPPI Engineering Conference, pp. 72 l-732
6. Wedel, G., “Drying Restraint in a Single-Tier Dryer Section”, Proceedings 1989 TAPPI
Annual Meeting, pp. 23-29.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to John Chabot, Warren Davis and Kerin Strange for their efforts in design,
construction and debugging of the WADS, and to Georgeta Maghiari for assistancein the
WADS checkout experiments.
Thanks to Paul Phelan for suggesting the use of a patterned platen to provide non-uniform
heat flux for a portion of the cockle study.
Thanks to David Orloff for guidance and participation in many aspectsof the reported
work, and for preparation of the sections on dryer surface topology and deposits.
IPST Confidential Information - Not for Public Disclosure
(For IPST Member Company’s Internal Use Only)