Liye Xie
Related Authors
Danielle Macdonald
University of Tulsa
Tiziana Gallo
Trent University
Annie R Antonites
DITSONG NATIONAL MUSEUMS OF SOUTH AFRICA
Justin Bradfield
University of Johannesburg, South Africa
Andrew C Sorensen
Universiteit Leiden
Christina Tsoraki
University of Leicester
Annemieke Verbaas
Universiteit Leiden
Ben Chan
Leiden University
Selena Vitezović
Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade, Serbia
InterestsView All (16)
Uploads
Papers by Liye Xie
Rammed-earth construction techniques (i.e., tamping or pounding loose earth into a solid mass with a rammer) were invented in the Iron Age Mediterranean and the Neolithic Middle Yellow River Valley and adopted across the globe overtime. Rammed-earth techniques were widely employed for building massive structures ranging from large tombs to the Great Wall in late Neolithic and dynastic China; as such, understanding the labor costs involved is fundamental for understanding labor organization for these public works.
Ethnographic, historic, and previous experimental accounts provide inconsistent labor estimations for rammed-earth compaction. Our research develops a method for contextually relevant and reliable labor estimations for archaeological rammed-earth structures of varying quality. We built a rammed-earth wall under realistic conditions, quantified the influential factors for rammed-earth quality, and developed the protocol for calibrating experimental results to match the archaeological record.
Our calibrated estimations for the rammed-earth walls at the Taosi and Erlitou urban sites reveal rather light labor demands on the inhabitants, implying that monumental architectures at the dawn of China’s dynastic history in the Central Plain were less about manifesting power than facilitating social changes. Our method can be applied to estimate labor costs for earthen structures in general and enables comparative studies across time and space regarding the relations between massive earthen construction and social-political transformation.
Quantitative microscopy characterizing the surface texture of wear traces has helped develop a more standardized chipped stone tool microwear practice. However, to date, these surface metrology methods have not been used to characterize ground stone tool surfaces. To expand the range of raw materials and tool types tested with these methods, we explore the application of imaging confocal microscopy for the quantification of an assemblage of experimental hoes, modelled after Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age artifacts from China. Surface texture properties of sediment wear are compared to wear from wooden hafts to identify whether confocal microscopy can distinguish between different wear types. The results show that there is a significant difference between sediment and hafting wear and suggests further research is needed to identify how experimental conditions affect polish measurements within wear types. This preliminary study indicates that imaging confocal microscopy has excellent potential for the quantification of microwear traces on ground stone tools and may contribute to our understanding of earth working tools in prehistory.
Ground stone tools encompass a wide array of implements important in the economic organization of many prehistoric and early historic societies; however, functional analysis of ground stone artefacts has been relatively limited in comparison to chipped stone tools. The appearance of microwear on ground stone artefacts is normally
more complex and complicated than on chipped stone artefacts, as the mineral and textural components of the raw materials chosen for ground stone artefacts often are more heterogeneous. Currently, the baseline principles for analyzing microwear on ground stone artefacts are primarily based on the studies of non-cutting tools such as
grinding and abrading implements.
Our research uses experimental ground stone shovels and hoes crafted from oolitic dolomite to understand the
raw material's effect on microwear development and to distinguish the microwear patterns associated with
varying sediment conditions in the Neolithic and Early Bronze archaeological sites in the Middle Yellow River
and Lower Yangzi River in China. The research combines detailed petrographic analysis of the raw material,
measurement of the worked material's physical properties, and careful examination of microwear using both
high-power and low-power approaches. The results not only advance the methods for microwear analysis on
heterogeneous raw materials, but also enrich the microwear dataset for understanding earth-working activities
associated with ground stone tools. Applying our results to analysis of archaeological counterparts will add
additional lines of evidence to evaluate the importance of farming and construction activities in Neolithic and
Bronze Age subsistence systems.
Rammed-earth construction techniques (i.e., tamping or pounding loose earth into a solid mass with a rammer) were invented in the Iron Age Mediterranean and the Neolithic Middle Yellow River Valley and adopted across the globe overtime. Rammed-earth techniques were widely employed for building massive structures ranging from large tombs to the Great Wall in late Neolithic and dynastic China; as such, understanding the labor costs involved is fundamental for understanding labor organization for these public works.
Ethnographic, historic, and previous experimental accounts provide inconsistent labor estimations for rammed-earth compaction. Our research develops a method for contextually relevant and reliable labor estimations for archaeological rammed-earth structures of varying quality. We built a rammed-earth wall under realistic conditions, quantified the influential factors for rammed-earth quality, and developed the protocol for calibrating experimental results to match the archaeological record.
Our calibrated estimations for the rammed-earth walls at the Taosi and Erlitou urban sites reveal rather light labor demands on the inhabitants, implying that monumental architectures at the dawn of China’s dynastic history in the Central Plain were less about manifesting power than facilitating social changes. Our method can be applied to estimate labor costs for earthen structures in general and enables comparative studies across time and space regarding the relations between massive earthen construction and social-political transformation.
Quantitative microscopy characterizing the surface texture of wear traces has helped develop a more standardized chipped stone tool microwear practice. However, to date, these surface metrology methods have not been used to characterize ground stone tool surfaces. To expand the range of raw materials and tool types tested with these methods, we explore the application of imaging confocal microscopy for the quantification of an assemblage of experimental hoes, modelled after Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age artifacts from China. Surface texture properties of sediment wear are compared to wear from wooden hafts to identify whether confocal microscopy can distinguish between different wear types. The results show that there is a significant difference between sediment and hafting wear and suggests further research is needed to identify how experimental conditions affect polish measurements within wear types. This preliminary study indicates that imaging confocal microscopy has excellent potential for the quantification of microwear traces on ground stone tools and may contribute to our understanding of earth working tools in prehistory.
Ground stone tools encompass a wide array of implements important in the economic organization of many prehistoric and early historic societies; however, functional analysis of ground stone artefacts has been relatively limited in comparison to chipped stone tools. The appearance of microwear on ground stone artefacts is normally
more complex and complicated than on chipped stone artefacts, as the mineral and textural components of the raw materials chosen for ground stone artefacts often are more heterogeneous. Currently, the baseline principles for analyzing microwear on ground stone artefacts are primarily based on the studies of non-cutting tools such as
grinding and abrading implements.
Our research uses experimental ground stone shovels and hoes crafted from oolitic dolomite to understand the
raw material's effect on microwear development and to distinguish the microwear patterns associated with
varying sediment conditions in the Neolithic and Early Bronze archaeological sites in the Middle Yellow River
and Lower Yangzi River in China. The research combines detailed petrographic analysis of the raw material,
measurement of the worked material's physical properties, and careful examination of microwear using both
high-power and low-power approaches. The results not only advance the methods for microwear analysis on
heterogeneous raw materials, but also enrich the microwear dataset for understanding earth-working activities
associated with ground stone tools. Applying our results to analysis of archaeological counterparts will add
additional lines of evidence to evaluate the importance of farming and construction activities in Neolithic and
Bronze Age subsistence systems.