Jens Hanssen
Address: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
less
Related Authors
Edith Szanto
University of Alabama - Tuscaloosa
Armando Salvatore
McGill University
Martin van Bruinessen
Universiteit Utrecht
Elena Loizidou
Birkbeck College, University of London
Gary Feinman
Field Museum
Veena Das
Johns Hopkins University
Mauro Grondona
University of Genova
Fabien Montcher
Saint Louis University
Rudolph (Rudi) Matthee
University of Delaware
Sergey Abashin
European University at St. Petersburg
InterestsView All (6)
Uploads
Papers by Jens Hanssen
political life that he had disavowed by the time he set out to write Arabic
Thought in the Liberal Age. Resting on a close reading of autobiographical
works, biographical cross-references and the writings of Hourani and his interlocutors themselves, this chapter deploys Albert’s world as a case study of the ‘Anglo-Arab labyrinth’ at the historical moment when the liberal age unravelled. At a more abstract level, Hourani’s and his colleagues’ inability to make their case for Palestine after World War II epitomized the defeat of Arab historicism and the triumph of Zionism’s deterritorialization of Palestinian history.
political life that he had disavowed by the time he set out to write Arabic
Thought in the Liberal Age. Resting on a close reading of autobiographical
works, biographical cross-references and the writings of Hourani and his interlocutors themselves, this chapter deploys Albert’s world as a case study of the ‘Anglo-Arab labyrinth’ at the historical moment when the liberal age unravelled. At a more abstract level, Hourani’s and his colleagues’ inability to make their case for Palestine after World War II epitomized the defeat of Arab historicism and the triumph of Zionism’s deterritorialization of Palestinian history.
This translation makes a key historical document accessible for the first time to an English-reading audience. An introduction by the translators sketches the history that led up to the civil strife in Mt. Lebanon, outlines a brief biography of Butrus al-Bustani, and provides an authoritative overview of the literary style and historiography of Nafir Suriyya. Rereading these pamphlets in the context of today’s political violence, in war-torn Syria and elsewhere in the Arab world, helps us gain a critical and historical perspective on sectarianism, foreign invasions, conflict resolution, Western interventionism, and nationalist tropes of reconciliation.
Restating Orientalism: A Critique of Modern Knowledge.
vii-x, 384 pp. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018. £30 ISBN 978-0-231-18762-6
Fifteen years after Edward Said’s untimely passing biographies have been written, numerous scores settled, and homages paid. Wael Hallaq presents a new fundamental critique of Orientalism – of a book that launched the process of decolonizing the humanities beginning in the 1980s – on its own terms. Restating Orientalism accuses Said of both conceptual subjugation of the Orient and limiting his critique to Orientalists. Other disciplines in the humanities were just as, if not more, complicit in the production of knowledge that ultimately made conceivable European genocides. He contends that a reformed and ethical form of Orientalism may yet lead the way towards decolonial epistemologies. At a more abstract level, Hallaq claims that European thought, particularly rationalist philosophy and secularism, preceded the politics of colonialism and bears the responsibility for looming planetary disaster.
During his lifetime, Said did not take lightly to criticism on methodological grounds, especially by those who were otherwise on the same side of the political barricade. The fallout with Sadek Jalal al-‘Azm (2016) destroyed their friendship after the former reviewed Orientalism and accused Said of peddling to cultural essentialism and alterity. Their acerbic correspondence signaled what Samer Frangie has called “the broken conversation” between academic radicalism and “theory as a weapon” (A. Cabral) on the anti-colonial front lines of the global cold war. Meanwhile, Islamists have tended to read Orientalism more favourably because – as al-‘Azm predicted – the book appeared to confirm not only Islam’s total and absolute difference but also the pernicious legacy of the enlightenment manifested in Western humanism, liberalism and secularism. Said spent much effort to dispel such receptions. He had joined the Palestinian revolution and stepped up his criticism of its leadership. He all but abandoned discourse analysis and whenever given a chance repeated the mantra he succinctly expressed in Tariq Ali’s documentary Black Athena, that: “The search for roots and origins is essentially an affirmation of identity, […] that is almost always a construction. There is no such thing as a pure Greek, or a pure Egyptian or pure anything. Everything is hopelessly mixed up together.” Such cultural mixity does not sit easily with the author of Restating Orientalism who presents a labyrinthine argument for an authentic and singular, premodern Islam that was destroyed by the rapacious liberal and secular forces of an autogenetic European modernity. Instead, the author maintains that so long as nefarious modern philosophical presuppositions are not exposed and rejected at their early modern genocidal roots, any political struggle, advocacy or revolution are futile and superficial attempts at human salvation.