Psychology

This article concerns a number of conditions that must be met before reaching a conclusion about the existence of the agreement component of a response style called acquiescence. The focus is on the specification of a common style factor behind at least 2 independent theoretical concepts, each measured by a balanced set of items. The proposed approach is explored with a random subsample (N = 986) from a large-scale survey, and subsequently confirmed in another subsample (N = 992) from the same population (Flanders) and in a random sample (N = 1,055) from a different population (Wallonia). The strong relation in both populations of the latent style factor with a variable "sum of agreements" supports the idea that it is possible to control for acquiescence in structural equations.

The purpose of this Benchmarking Report is to discuss the behavioural algorithms used in MyOutcomes® Version 18, and review the resulting changes in the international benchmarks used to inform quality improvements in behavioural healthcare and human service organizations. Professor Doug Steinley provides an independent analysis and review of the predictive model available in MyOutcomes® Version 18, and Cindy Hansen, MyOutcomes® Clinical Director, previews upcoming changes and outcome benchmarks.

In the realm of psychological therapy, the evaluation of treatment efficacy frequently hinges on the data derived from symptom measures administered before and after therapy. Although this approach provides a straightforward gauge of progress, it is fraught with limitations that often lead to an incomplete or skewed understanding of therapeutic outcomes. To develop a more nuanced and accurate assessment of therapy success, it is vital to incorporate additional measures such as patient distress, individual goals, and the strength of the therapeutic alliance. "When evaluating whether treatment has been successful or unsuccessful, it is problematic to place too much reliance on evidence from self-report symptom measures."-John McLeod This article delves into the inadequacies of traditional symptom measurement approaches and advocates for a more comprehensive evaluation framework.

Welcome to your deep dive into the fascinating field of youth therapeutic alliance measures. This crucial element plays a pivotal role in building the groundwork for successful therapy outcomes. Throughout this guide, we will extensively review the psychometric properties of such measurements, the unexpected avenues of treatment outcomes, and the complex dynamic of alliance ruptures and repairs. 

Psychometric Properties: We'll delve into the psychometrics, exploring what these measurements reveal and how they contribute to the therapeutic alliance.

Treatment Outcomes: Discover the profound impact these measurements have on the final results of therapy.

Alliance Ruptures and Repairs: We'll shed light on how metacommunication aids in rebuilding the bridge after a rupture, using real-world video examples.

Ready to enhance your practice?

In contemporary psychiatry, multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for providing comprehensive care to patients. However, the integration of measurement-based care (MBC) into routine practice has faced substantial obstacles, primarily stemming from acceptance issues among healthcare professionals. Drawing on the recent study, "Improving measurement-based care implementation in adult ambulatory psychiatry: a virtual focus group interview with multidisciplinary healthcare professionals," this article delves into how the innovative Therapy Outcome Monitoring System (TOMS) by Holistic Research Canada can transform this landscape. By enhancing acceptance among multidisciplinary teams, TOMS is poised to set a new standard in measurement informed care, ensuring better patient outcomes and streamlined care processes.