
Klaus Raizer
Related Authors
Ricardo Gudwin
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Ricardo Gudwin
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Ron Chrisley
University of Sussex
Robert W Clowes
FCSH, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (Portugal)
André Paraense
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Stan Franklin
University of Memphis
Teila Clift
Sheffield Hallam University
InterestsView All (15)
Uploads
Papers by Klaus Raizer
in an urban network. This architecture relies on a machine consciousness approach - Global
Workspace Theory - in order to use competition and broadcast, allowing a group of local traffic
controllers to interact, resulting in a better group performance. The main idea is that the local
controllers usually perform a purely reactive behavior, defining the times of red and green lights,
according just to local information. These local controllers compete in order to define which of
them is experiencing the most critical traffic situation. The controller in the worst condition
gains access to the global workspace, further broadcasting its condition (and its location) to all
other controllers, asking for their help in dealing with its situation. This call from the controller
accessing the global workspace will cause an interference in the reactive local behavior, for those
local controllers with some chance in helping the controller in a critical condition, by containing
traffic in its direction. This group behavior, coordinated by the global workspace strategy, turns
the once reactive behavior into a kind of deliberative one. We show that this strategy is capable
of improving the overall mean travel time of vehicles flowing through the urban network. A
consistent gain in performance with the “Artificial Consciousness” traffic signal controller during
all simulation time, throughout different simulated scenarios, could be observed, ranging from
around 13,8% to more than 21%.
in an urban network. This architecture relies on a machine consciousness approach - Global
Workspace Theory - in order to use competition and broadcast, allowing a group of local traffic
controllers to interact, resulting in a better group performance. The main idea is that the local
controllers usually perform a purely reactive behavior, defining the times of red and green lights,
according just to local information. These local controllers compete in order to define which of
them is experiencing the most critical traffic situation. The controller in the worst condition
gains access to the global workspace, further broadcasting its condition (and its location) to all
other controllers, asking for their help in dealing with its situation. This call from the controller
accessing the global workspace will cause an interference in the reactive local behavior, for those
local controllers with some chance in helping the controller in a critical condition, by containing
traffic in its direction. This group behavior, coordinated by the global workspace strategy, turns
the once reactive behavior into a kind of deliberative one. We show that this strategy is capable
of improving the overall mean travel time of vehicles flowing through the urban network. A
consistent gain in performance with the “Artificial Consciousness” traffic signal controller during
all simulation time, throughout different simulated scenarios, could be observed, ranging from
around 13,8% to more than 21%.