Recent contributions by Silvia Bottinelli
Chapter on domestic cultures and contemporary Italian art included in the multidisciplinary volum... more Chapter on domestic cultures and contemporary Italian art included in the multidisciplinary volume edited by architectural historians Michela Bassanelli and Imma Forino.
Silvia Bottinelli, “Sense Makes Memory: Sugar, Plants, and María Magdalena Campos-Pons’s Countervisuality in Cuba,” Food, Media, Senses, 123–36. Eds. Christina Bartz, Jens Ruchatz, Eva Wattolik. Bielefeld, Germani: Transcript Verlag, 2023. Open Access: https://www.transcript-publishing.com/978-3-8376-6479-9/food-media-senses/
This pap... more Open Access: https://www.transcript-publishing.com/978-3-8376-6479-9/food-media-senses/
This paper analyzes Cuban artist María Magdalena Campos-Pons’s installation The Herbalist Tools (1993–94), exhibition Alchemy of the Soul (2016), and community-based project Intermittent Rivers (2019–ongoing), all of which center food production and processing as markers of collective identities. Specifically, Campos-Pons’s visual and material language incorporates references to sugar plantations and refineries, as well as to foraging and agricultural traditions passed down by her ancestors – enslaved Yoruba and Chinese indentured workers in Matanzas, Cuba. Countering the distanced visuality of 19th century paintings that illustrate plantation landscapes and sugar refineries as efficient and productive, Campos-Pons’s artworks offer immersive spaces that activate the viewers’ senses, including smell and taste, to evoke her vivid childhood memories. Through multisensoriality, her installations allow the public to feel what she felt, to get a taste of the embodied experience of Cuban communities often left at the margins. In ongoing projects, the artist collaborates with Matanzas residents to create functional and symbolic infrastructures for the reinvention of Cuban food systems, returning some of the sensorial landscapes of the artist’s generation to the present through community gardens and food forests.
Our contribution discusses the practice of Panem et Circenses (Alessandra Ivul and Ludovico Pensa... more Our contribution discusses the practice of Panem et Circenses (Alessandra Ivul and Ludovico Pensato), an art collective whose work revolves around food and agriculture. After founding Panem et Circenses in Berlin, Ivul and Pensato opened an artist-run exhibition space devoted to food-based practices in Bologna. Since 2017, they have lived at Ca' Inua, a farm in Marzabotto, on the Bologna Apennines. Ivul and Pensato see their experimentation with regenerative and sustainable farming as a form of performance art, an embodiment of their engagement with philosophy and theory. Their work participates in discourses-with a range of variations that build on Indigenous sciences/knowledges, posthumanist and new materialist philosophies, and environmental arts and humanities-that recenter symbiosis, relationality, and human/more-than-human entanglements. Our methodological approach relies on critical, art historical, and visual studies tools and is informed by ethnographic observations on site as well as an interview with the artists published here. We begin to address the specificity of Panem et Circenses' relationship with the lands that they care for and locate their experience in the larger landscape of Art Farming practices. Panem et Circenses translate theoretical frameworks into everyday interactions, hands-on activities, communitybuilding, and long-term planning for the ecology of Ca' Inua.
Silvia Bottinelli, Artists and the Practice of Agriculture Politics and Aesthetics of Food Sovereignty in Art since 1960. London/New York: Routledge 2024, 2024
Artists and the Practice of Agriculture maps out examples of artistic practices that engage with ... more Artists and the Practice of Agriculture maps out examples of artistic practices that engage with the aesthetics and politics of gathering food, growing edible and medicinal plants, and interacting with non-human collaborators. In the hands of contemporary artists, farming and foraging become forms of visual and material language that convey personal and political meanings.
This book provides a critical analysis of artistic practices that model alternative food systems. It presents rich academic insights as well as 16 conversations with practicing artists. The volume addresses pressing issues, such as the interconnectedness of human and other-than-human beings, the weight of industrial agriculture, the legacy of colonialism, and the promise of place-based and embodied pedagogies. Through participatory projects, the artists discussed here reflect on the links between past histories, present challenges, and future solutions for the food sovereignty of local and networked communities.
The book is an easy-to-navigate resource for readers interested in food studies, visual and material cultures, contemporary art, ecocriticism, and the environmental humanities.
Books by Silvia Bottinelli
Peeking into the home through the eyes of artists and image-makers, this book unveils the untold ... more Peeking into the home through the eyes of artists and image-makers, this book unveils the untold story of Italian domestic experiences from the 1940s to the 1970s. Torn between the trauma of World War II and the frenzied optimism of the postwar decades, and haunted by the echoes of fascism, the domestic realm embodied contrasting and often contradictory meanings: care and violence, oppression and emotional fulfillment, nourishment and privation.
Silvia Bottinelli casts a fresh light on domestic experiences that are easily overlooked and taken for granted, finding new expressions of home - as an idea, an emotion, a space, and a set of habits - in a variety of cultural and artistic movements, including new realism, visual poetry, pop art, arte povera, and radical architecture, among others. Double-Edged Comforts finds nuance by viewing artistic interpretations of domestic life in dialogue with contemporaneous visual culture: the advertisements, commercials, illustrations, and popular magazines that influenced and informed art, even materially, and often triggered the critical reactions of artists. Bottinelli pays particular attention to women's perspectives, discussing artworks that have fallen through the cracks of established art historical narratives and giving specific consideration to women artists: Carla Accardi, Marisa Merz, Maria Lai, Ketty La Rocca, Lucia Marcucci, and others who were often marginalized by the Italian art system in this period.
From sleeping and bathing, chores, and making and eating food to the arrival of television, Double-Edged Comforts provides a fresh account of modern domesticity relevant to anyone interested in understanding how we make sense of the places we live and what we do there, showing how art complicates the familiar comforts and meanings of home.
Lead in Modern and Contemporary Art is the first edited volume to critically examine uses of lead... more Lead in Modern and Contemporary Art is the first edited volume to critically examine uses of lead as both material and cultural signifier in modern and contemporary art. The book analyzes the work of a diverse group of artists working in Europe, the Middle East, and North America, and takes into account the ways in which gender, race, and class can affect the cultural perception of lead.
Bringing together contributions from a distinguished group of international contributors across various fields, this volume explores lead's relevance from a number of perspectives, including art history, technical art history, art criticism, and curatorial studies. Drawing on current art historical concerns with materiality, this volume builds on recent exhibitions and scholarship that reconsider the role of materials in shaping artistic meaning, thus giving a central relevance to the object and its physicality.
Table of Contents:
Introduction: To Be Continued... Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) and Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)1. A Most Insidious Poison Taking Advantage of our Necessities: A Brief Historical Introduction to Lead and Lead Poisoning, Christian Warren (Brooklyn College - The City University of New York, USA)2. Lead's Historic Transformations, Spike Bucklow (University of Cambridge, UK)3. In the Backyard at Burcroft: Henry Moore's Experiments in Lead, Rowan Bailey (University of Huddersfield, UK)4. The Weakness of Lead: Materiality and Modern American Sculpture, Marin R. Sullivan (Harry Bertoia Foundation & Cheekwood Estate and Gardens, USA)5. Due Process: Richard Serra's Early Splash/Cast Works, Jeffrey Weiss (The Institute of Fine Arts, USA)6. Exorbitant Matter: Materiality According to Lynda Benglis, Luke Naessens (Princeton University, USA)7. Lead in the Lexicon of Gilberto Zorio's Sculpture, Elizabeth Mangini (California College of the Arts, USA)8. The Stopping Power of Lead: Luciano Fabro, Giuseppe Penone, and Marisa Merz, Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)9. "Mankind needs some lead so as to be somewhat heavier": Beuys, Alchemy, and Duchamp, Claudia Mesch (Arizona State University, USA)10. A Conversation with Remo Salvadori, Sharon Hecker (independent scholar) and Silvia Bottinellii (Tufts University, USA) Critical Introduction by Rosalind McKever (Victoria and Albert Museum, UK)11. Two Views of Anselm Kiefer: In the Studio and In the Museum Kiefer Speaks About Lead with Karl Ove KnausgaardLoaded Lead: Anselm Kiefer in the Collection of the Israel Museum, Sharon Tager and Adina Kamien (The Israel Museum, Jerusalem)12. Anthony Caro: Lead and Wood Sculptures. 1980-1989, Karen Wilkin (independent scholar)13. The New British Sculpture and the Poetics and Pragmatics of Lead, Jon Wood (independent scholar)14. Organizing Against an Invisible Threat. Lead According to Futurefarmers and Mel Chin, Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) 15. An Interview with Daniela Rivera: The weight of lead and painting beyond the surface, Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) and Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)
https://leonardo.info/review/2021/08/lead-in-modern-and-contemporary-art?gclid=Cj0KCQjwlOmLBhCHARIsAGiJg7mRufRhbaH-1mUZ4TjC_LcTHnqqwLo_YBlv1a72UZ59et6fsEZ4Lt0aAgMqEALw_wcB
The Taste of Art offers a sample of scholarly essays that examine the use of food in Western cont... more The Taste of Art offers a sample of scholarly essays that examine the use of food in Western contemporary art practices. The contributors are scholars from a range of disciplines, such as art history and philosophy, film studies and history. As a whole, the volume shows how artists engage with food as matter and process, in order to explore alternative aesthetic strategies and indicate countercultural shifts in society.
In the first section, the reader will find papers that explore the theoretical intersections of art and food, Food art’s historical root of Futurism, and the ways in which food carries gendered meaning in popular film. The following sections analyze how artists challenge mainstream ideas through food in a variety of scenarios. Starting from a focus on the body and subjectivity, the authors zoom out to look at the domestic sphere, and finally examine the role of the public sphere.
The papers included in The Taste of Art consider numerous case studies, by devoting particular attention to artists like, among others: Daniel Spoerri, Dieter Roth, Joseph Beuys, Al Ruppersberg, Alison Knowles, Martha Rosler, Paul McCarthy, Luciano Fabro, Carries Mae Weems, Peter Fischli and David Weiss, Janine Antoni, Liza Lou, and Natalie Jeremijenko.
http://www.predella.it/index.php/component/content/article/53-issue-no-37/352-37-mono-index.html
Not simply the catalogue of the Pitti Palace Contemporary Art collection, this monograph discusse... more Not simply the catalogue of the Pitti Palace Contemporary Art collection, this monograph discusses the history and reception of the Fiorino award (1950-1978), through which the Pitti Palace formed the first nucleus of 250 pieces of its contemporary section. The Fiorino award was based on the example of Fascist Trade Union exhibitions, giving artists of diverse background the chance to show their more recent work. The award received harsh criticism from artists and intellectuals during the 1970s, a period of prevalent institutional critique.
This monograph analyzes the role of the art and design history magazine seleARTE in popularizing ... more This monograph analyzes the role of the art and design history magazine seleARTE in popularizing international culture, in the context of Cold War Italy. The multidisciplinary approach to the subject allows an understanding of political, theoretical and cultural aspects, examined through the lens of Art and Design History, Media Studies, Museology, and Cultural Studies.
Articles by Silvia Bottinelli
In this text, written in 1953, Carlo Ludovico Ragghianti, an art history professor at the Univers... more In this text, written in 1953, Carlo Ludovico Ragghianti, an art history professor at the University of Pisa, draws parallels between Italian Fascism, Soviet Communism, and the political scene in the USA under the sway of McCarthyism. It is a response in the leading Italian art journal, seleARTE, to an article published in Art News, in which Ben Shahn urged that art can only flourish in the context of free speech and political tolerance.
Palinsesti, 2022
Il doppio numero di "Palinsesti" intitolato "Ma il genio chi è?" include articoli incentrati sull... more Il doppio numero di "Palinsesti" intitolato "Ma il genio chi è?" include articoli incentrati sull'arte e la critica delle donne nell'Italia del secondo dopoguerra. Analizzando il lavoro realizzato da alcune artiste dagli anni Sessanta a oggi, in questo fascicolo si evidenziano alcune differenze generazionali, e sono al contempo riconosciute le ancora persistenti iniquità che affliggono il mondo dell'arte. Nel nostro doppio numero, i termini "donna" e "femminile" si riferiscono a un'idea di femminilità precostituita all'interno di quei rigidi binomi di genere che erano/sono dominanti nella società Italiana contemporanea. Siamo ovviamente coscienti del fatto che tali binomi rappresentano una essenzializzante semplificazione della gamma fluida e diversificata di possibili identità di genere e orientamenti sessuali che gli individui possono esperire, oggi come allora. Gli articoli inclusi in questa pubblicazione discutono e decostruiscono infatti alcuni aspetti oppressivi peculiari a queste rigide classificazioni e analizzano le esperienze soggettive di alcune personalità che assunsero posizioni diverse sia nei confronti del discorso femminista che all'interno del sistema dell'arte. Questo secondo fascicolo di "Ma il genio chi è?" allarga alcune linee narrative già incluse nel primo numero, fornendo un approfondimento sui temi della sessualità, della domesticità, dei processi artistici e delle scelte espositive femminili, sviluppati dalle donne nel contesto dell'Italia del secondo dopoguerra. In aggiunta, questo volume si apre a questioni che erano rimaste ai margini nel primo fascicolo, esaminando, ad esempio, le relazioni umane/non umane, le connessioni con luoghi specifici, l'immaginario spaziale e fantascientifico, i temi della storia e dell'archivio. Questi aspetti, tradizionalmente non associati all'ambito stereotipato del femminile, hanno comunque attivato l'immaginazione e i processi critici di artiste donne, dimostrando ulteriormente che aspettative rigide sulla divisione di genere non rappresentano in alcun modo la complessità di interessi e contributi offerti da persone di qualsiasi genere.
Palinsesti, 2022
A multidimensional analysis and contextualization of Grazia Toderi’s early video titled Soap (199... more A multidimensional analysis and contextualization of Grazia Toderi’s early video titled Soap (1993), this essay follows the artist’s journey as she explores the connections of everyday and cosmic spaces. Relating micro and macro, Toderi questions and reinvents common objects and assumptions, and then transfigures them into contemplative and sublime experiences through the decades of her practice. Not feeling weighed down by home and family responsibilities, she liberates herself through the creative freedom to investigate topics beyond the domestic realm. Her position is radically distant from that of feminist theorists and artists of the previous generation, whose positions are examined here in comparison to Toderi’s.
https://teseo.unitn.it/palinsesti/issue/view/155
Art in Translation, 2022
This essay presents an analysis of the book Arte dopo il 1945. U.S.A (Art after 1945. U.S.A), pub... more This essay presents an analysis of the book Arte dopo il 1945. U.S.A (Art after 1945. U.S.A), published by Italian art historian and critic Marisa Volpi in 1969, after traveling to the United States of America in the mid-1960s. While Volpi's perspective is imbued with Eurocentric art genealogies, her direct observation of US contexts and encounter with artists and institutional figures in North America shape aspects of her narrative. Volpi sees contemporary US art as a response to the vast landscapes, urban materials, and excessive consumerism of US spaces and
Palinsesti 9 (2019), 2020
Yet Who Is the Genius? Vol.1, is the first of two issues that Silvia Bottinelli and Giorgia Gasta... more Yet Who Is the Genius? Vol.1, is the first of two issues that Silvia Bottinelli and Giorgia Gastaldon co-edited for the journal Palinsesti.
Vol.2 will be available in March 2021.
Both volumes examine women's art and criticism in postwar Italy through the rediscovery of a variety of case studies and discourses. The first issue, for example, includes articles about feminist photography, public art in urban settings, visual poetry, kitchen design, painting, sculpture, artist books and more. Recurrent themes question traditional women's roles and identities by deconstructing domesticity, sexuality, authorship, and personal narratives. Vol.1 presents contributions by Giovanna Zapperi, Imma Forino, Cristina Casero, Caterina Iaquinta, Raffaella Perna, and Maria Bremer, whose diverse professional and academic backgrounds provide a multifaceted representation of postwar Italian art and criticism.
Hot Art Cold War. Southern and Eastern European Writing on American Art 1945–1990. , 2020
It was common for critics to look at American art through a political lens, especially when Itali... more It was common for critics to look at American art through a political lens, especially when Italian writers evaluated American art institutions. The United States was associated with values of capitalism and democracy. Like consumerism, capitalism was viewed with suspicion immediately after the Second World War. Based on Marxist theories, some scholars linked the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few families with aspirations to political power. Thus, critics were suspicious of the American art system, which they saw as supported by the philanthropic efforts of a wealthy minority, driven by a political agenda. An opposing viewpoint characterized the writings of Italian liberal writers, who appreciated the efficiency of the US taxation system and its ability to trigger philanthropic donations that benefitted art museums and their collections. Liberal authors tended to see the United States as a symbol of democracy and intellectual freedom, an image that American politicians and curators planned to convey overseas.
Italian critics’ ability to fully appreciate individual artistic intentions varied, depending on the conditions under which they encountered the artworks themselves. Some, like Lionello Venturi,
Marisa Volpi, Germano Celant, or Francesca Alinovi, spent extensive periods of time in the United States. This experience allowed them a more genuine exchange with local artists and art professionals, which resulted in a more nuanced understanding of the American context. Others, like Roberto Longhi, Carlo Ludovico Ragghianti, Giulio Carlo Argan, and Enrico Crispolti mostly viewed American art through photographic reproductions and traveling exhibitions in Europe. In such cases, the critics’ analysis tended to be more impacted by theoretical schemas, and they interpreted the artworks using critical categories that were proper to European art-historical discourses.
Starting in the 1960s, transatlantic travel became more accessible, allowing a more frequent exchange between American and European artists, curators, and writers. For example, the African-American curator Henry Martin was involved in the Arte Povera experience, participated in the Italian itinerant theater company Lo Zoo, and later collaborated with artist Gianfranco Baruchello at Agricola Cornelia—a project at the boundary of art and farming. An increasing number of exhibitions featured both Italian and international artists, who seemed to adopt common goals and similar language. Also, the publication of Italian criticism in both Italian and English became more customary starting in the late 1970s, an indication that the intended public of Italian texts encompassed international readers.
For five decades, Gianni Pettena and Ugo La Pietra have tested many limits, such as those between... more For five decades, Gianni Pettena and Ugo La Pietra have tested many limits, such as those between architecture and art; design and material culture; traditional mediums and experimentation. This paper touches upon all those aspects, but more consistently addresses the ways in which Pettena and La Pietra crossed the boundaries of theory and practice in their early work. I choose to focus on these two personalities to exemplify how art can pinpoint complex ideas, articulating them through a form of language that differs from that of other disciplines while still maintaining high intellectual engagement.
It must be noted that a similar blending of intellectual engagement and hands on practice characterized the life of militant thinkers, not only artists, in 1960s and 1970s Italy.
This is the guest editors' statement for a special issue of Public Art Dialogue. Margherita d'Aya... more This is the guest editors' statement for a special issue of Public Art Dialogue. Margherita d'Ayala Valva and Silvia Bottinelli reflect on the role of food in performance, community-based art and social sculpture since the 1960s, while overviewing the contents of their co-edited volume.
Uploads
Recent contributions by Silvia Bottinelli
This paper analyzes Cuban artist María Magdalena Campos-Pons’s installation The Herbalist Tools (1993–94), exhibition Alchemy of the Soul (2016), and community-based project Intermittent Rivers (2019–ongoing), all of which center food production and processing as markers of collective identities. Specifically, Campos-Pons’s visual and material language incorporates references to sugar plantations and refineries, as well as to foraging and agricultural traditions passed down by her ancestors – enslaved Yoruba and Chinese indentured workers in Matanzas, Cuba. Countering the distanced visuality of 19th century paintings that illustrate plantation landscapes and sugar refineries as efficient and productive, Campos-Pons’s artworks offer immersive spaces that activate the viewers’ senses, including smell and taste, to evoke her vivid childhood memories. Through multisensoriality, her installations allow the public to feel what she felt, to get a taste of the embodied experience of Cuban communities often left at the margins. In ongoing projects, the artist collaborates with Matanzas residents to create functional and symbolic infrastructures for the reinvention of Cuban food systems, returning some of the sensorial landscapes of the artist’s generation to the present through community gardens and food forests.
This book provides a critical analysis of artistic practices that model alternative food systems. It presents rich academic insights as well as 16 conversations with practicing artists. The volume addresses pressing issues, such as the interconnectedness of human and other-than-human beings, the weight of industrial agriculture, the legacy of colonialism, and the promise of place-based and embodied pedagogies. Through participatory projects, the artists discussed here reflect on the links between past histories, present challenges, and future solutions for the food sovereignty of local and networked communities.
The book is an easy-to-navigate resource for readers interested in food studies, visual and material cultures, contemporary art, ecocriticism, and the environmental humanities.
Books by Silvia Bottinelli
Silvia Bottinelli casts a fresh light on domestic experiences that are easily overlooked and taken for granted, finding new expressions of home - as an idea, an emotion, a space, and a set of habits - in a variety of cultural and artistic movements, including new realism, visual poetry, pop art, arte povera, and radical architecture, among others. Double-Edged Comforts finds nuance by viewing artistic interpretations of domestic life in dialogue with contemporaneous visual culture: the advertisements, commercials, illustrations, and popular magazines that influenced and informed art, even materially, and often triggered the critical reactions of artists. Bottinelli pays particular attention to women's perspectives, discussing artworks that have fallen through the cracks of established art historical narratives and giving specific consideration to women artists: Carla Accardi, Marisa Merz, Maria Lai, Ketty La Rocca, Lucia Marcucci, and others who were often marginalized by the Italian art system in this period.
From sleeping and bathing, chores, and making and eating food to the arrival of television, Double-Edged Comforts provides a fresh account of modern domesticity relevant to anyone interested in understanding how we make sense of the places we live and what we do there, showing how art complicates the familiar comforts and meanings of home.
Bringing together contributions from a distinguished group of international contributors across various fields, this volume explores lead's relevance from a number of perspectives, including art history, technical art history, art criticism, and curatorial studies. Drawing on current art historical concerns with materiality, this volume builds on recent exhibitions and scholarship that reconsider the role of materials in shaping artistic meaning, thus giving a central relevance to the object and its physicality.
Table of Contents:
Introduction: To Be Continued... Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) and Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)1. A Most Insidious Poison Taking Advantage of our Necessities: A Brief Historical Introduction to Lead and Lead Poisoning, Christian Warren (Brooklyn College - The City University of New York, USA)2. Lead's Historic Transformations, Spike Bucklow (University of Cambridge, UK)3. In the Backyard at Burcroft: Henry Moore's Experiments in Lead, Rowan Bailey (University of Huddersfield, UK)4. The Weakness of Lead: Materiality and Modern American Sculpture, Marin R. Sullivan (Harry Bertoia Foundation & Cheekwood Estate and Gardens, USA)5. Due Process: Richard Serra's Early Splash/Cast Works, Jeffrey Weiss (The Institute of Fine Arts, USA)6. Exorbitant Matter: Materiality According to Lynda Benglis, Luke Naessens (Princeton University, USA)7. Lead in the Lexicon of Gilberto Zorio's Sculpture, Elizabeth Mangini (California College of the Arts, USA)8. The Stopping Power of Lead: Luciano Fabro, Giuseppe Penone, and Marisa Merz, Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)9. "Mankind needs some lead so as to be somewhat heavier": Beuys, Alchemy, and Duchamp, Claudia Mesch (Arizona State University, USA)10. A Conversation with Remo Salvadori, Sharon Hecker (independent scholar) and Silvia Bottinellii (Tufts University, USA) Critical Introduction by Rosalind McKever (Victoria and Albert Museum, UK)11. Two Views of Anselm Kiefer: In the Studio and In the Museum Kiefer Speaks About Lead with Karl Ove KnausgaardLoaded Lead: Anselm Kiefer in the Collection of the Israel Museum, Sharon Tager and Adina Kamien (The Israel Museum, Jerusalem)12. Anthony Caro: Lead and Wood Sculptures. 1980-1989, Karen Wilkin (independent scholar)13. The New British Sculpture and the Poetics and Pragmatics of Lead, Jon Wood (independent scholar)14. Organizing Against an Invisible Threat. Lead According to Futurefarmers and Mel Chin, Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) 15. An Interview with Daniela Rivera: The weight of lead and painting beyond the surface, Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) and Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)
https://leonardo.info/review/2021/08/lead-in-modern-and-contemporary-art?gclid=Cj0KCQjwlOmLBhCHARIsAGiJg7mRufRhbaH-1mUZ4TjC_LcTHnqqwLo_YBlv1a72UZ59et6fsEZ4Lt0aAgMqEALw_wcB
In the first section, the reader will find papers that explore the theoretical intersections of art and food, Food art’s historical root of Futurism, and the ways in which food carries gendered meaning in popular film. The following sections analyze how artists challenge mainstream ideas through food in a variety of scenarios. Starting from a focus on the body and subjectivity, the authors zoom out to look at the domestic sphere, and finally examine the role of the public sphere.
The papers included in The Taste of Art consider numerous case studies, by devoting particular attention to artists like, among others: Daniel Spoerri, Dieter Roth, Joseph Beuys, Al Ruppersberg, Alison Knowles, Martha Rosler, Paul McCarthy, Luciano Fabro, Carries Mae Weems, Peter Fischli and David Weiss, Janine Antoni, Liza Lou, and Natalie Jeremijenko.
Articles by Silvia Bottinelli
https://teseo.unitn.it/palinsesti/issue/view/155
Vol.2 will be available in March 2021.
Both volumes examine women's art and criticism in postwar Italy through the rediscovery of a variety of case studies and discourses. The first issue, for example, includes articles about feminist photography, public art in urban settings, visual poetry, kitchen design, painting, sculpture, artist books and more. Recurrent themes question traditional women's roles and identities by deconstructing domesticity, sexuality, authorship, and personal narratives. Vol.1 presents contributions by Giovanna Zapperi, Imma Forino, Cristina Casero, Caterina Iaquinta, Raffaella Perna, and Maria Bremer, whose diverse professional and academic backgrounds provide a multifaceted representation of postwar Italian art and criticism.
Italian critics’ ability to fully appreciate individual artistic intentions varied, depending on the conditions under which they encountered the artworks themselves. Some, like Lionello Venturi,
Marisa Volpi, Germano Celant, or Francesca Alinovi, spent extensive periods of time in the United States. This experience allowed them a more genuine exchange with local artists and art professionals, which resulted in a more nuanced understanding of the American context. Others, like Roberto Longhi, Carlo Ludovico Ragghianti, Giulio Carlo Argan, and Enrico Crispolti mostly viewed American art through photographic reproductions and traveling exhibitions in Europe. In such cases, the critics’ analysis tended to be more impacted by theoretical schemas, and they interpreted the artworks using critical categories that were proper to European art-historical discourses.
Starting in the 1960s, transatlantic travel became more accessible, allowing a more frequent exchange between American and European artists, curators, and writers. For example, the African-American curator Henry Martin was involved in the Arte Povera experience, participated in the Italian itinerant theater company Lo Zoo, and later collaborated with artist Gianfranco Baruchello at Agricola Cornelia—a project at the boundary of art and farming. An increasing number of exhibitions featured both Italian and international artists, who seemed to adopt common goals and similar language. Also, the publication of Italian criticism in both Italian and English became more customary starting in the late 1970s, an indication that the intended public of Italian texts encompassed international readers.
It must be noted that a similar blending of intellectual engagement and hands on practice characterized the life of militant thinkers, not only artists, in 1960s and 1970s Italy.
This paper analyzes Cuban artist María Magdalena Campos-Pons’s installation The Herbalist Tools (1993–94), exhibition Alchemy of the Soul (2016), and community-based project Intermittent Rivers (2019–ongoing), all of which center food production and processing as markers of collective identities. Specifically, Campos-Pons’s visual and material language incorporates references to sugar plantations and refineries, as well as to foraging and agricultural traditions passed down by her ancestors – enslaved Yoruba and Chinese indentured workers in Matanzas, Cuba. Countering the distanced visuality of 19th century paintings that illustrate plantation landscapes and sugar refineries as efficient and productive, Campos-Pons’s artworks offer immersive spaces that activate the viewers’ senses, including smell and taste, to evoke her vivid childhood memories. Through multisensoriality, her installations allow the public to feel what she felt, to get a taste of the embodied experience of Cuban communities often left at the margins. In ongoing projects, the artist collaborates with Matanzas residents to create functional and symbolic infrastructures for the reinvention of Cuban food systems, returning some of the sensorial landscapes of the artist’s generation to the present through community gardens and food forests.
This book provides a critical analysis of artistic practices that model alternative food systems. It presents rich academic insights as well as 16 conversations with practicing artists. The volume addresses pressing issues, such as the interconnectedness of human and other-than-human beings, the weight of industrial agriculture, the legacy of colonialism, and the promise of place-based and embodied pedagogies. Through participatory projects, the artists discussed here reflect on the links between past histories, present challenges, and future solutions for the food sovereignty of local and networked communities.
The book is an easy-to-navigate resource for readers interested in food studies, visual and material cultures, contemporary art, ecocriticism, and the environmental humanities.
Silvia Bottinelli casts a fresh light on domestic experiences that are easily overlooked and taken for granted, finding new expressions of home - as an idea, an emotion, a space, and a set of habits - in a variety of cultural and artistic movements, including new realism, visual poetry, pop art, arte povera, and radical architecture, among others. Double-Edged Comforts finds nuance by viewing artistic interpretations of domestic life in dialogue with contemporaneous visual culture: the advertisements, commercials, illustrations, and popular magazines that influenced and informed art, even materially, and often triggered the critical reactions of artists. Bottinelli pays particular attention to women's perspectives, discussing artworks that have fallen through the cracks of established art historical narratives and giving specific consideration to women artists: Carla Accardi, Marisa Merz, Maria Lai, Ketty La Rocca, Lucia Marcucci, and others who were often marginalized by the Italian art system in this period.
From sleeping and bathing, chores, and making and eating food to the arrival of television, Double-Edged Comforts provides a fresh account of modern domesticity relevant to anyone interested in understanding how we make sense of the places we live and what we do there, showing how art complicates the familiar comforts and meanings of home.
Bringing together contributions from a distinguished group of international contributors across various fields, this volume explores lead's relevance from a number of perspectives, including art history, technical art history, art criticism, and curatorial studies. Drawing on current art historical concerns with materiality, this volume builds on recent exhibitions and scholarship that reconsider the role of materials in shaping artistic meaning, thus giving a central relevance to the object and its physicality.
Table of Contents:
Introduction: To Be Continued... Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) and Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)1. A Most Insidious Poison Taking Advantage of our Necessities: A Brief Historical Introduction to Lead and Lead Poisoning, Christian Warren (Brooklyn College - The City University of New York, USA)2. Lead's Historic Transformations, Spike Bucklow (University of Cambridge, UK)3. In the Backyard at Burcroft: Henry Moore's Experiments in Lead, Rowan Bailey (University of Huddersfield, UK)4. The Weakness of Lead: Materiality and Modern American Sculpture, Marin R. Sullivan (Harry Bertoia Foundation & Cheekwood Estate and Gardens, USA)5. Due Process: Richard Serra's Early Splash/Cast Works, Jeffrey Weiss (The Institute of Fine Arts, USA)6. Exorbitant Matter: Materiality According to Lynda Benglis, Luke Naessens (Princeton University, USA)7. Lead in the Lexicon of Gilberto Zorio's Sculpture, Elizabeth Mangini (California College of the Arts, USA)8. The Stopping Power of Lead: Luciano Fabro, Giuseppe Penone, and Marisa Merz, Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)9. "Mankind needs some lead so as to be somewhat heavier": Beuys, Alchemy, and Duchamp, Claudia Mesch (Arizona State University, USA)10. A Conversation with Remo Salvadori, Sharon Hecker (independent scholar) and Silvia Bottinellii (Tufts University, USA) Critical Introduction by Rosalind McKever (Victoria and Albert Museum, UK)11. Two Views of Anselm Kiefer: In the Studio and In the Museum Kiefer Speaks About Lead with Karl Ove KnausgaardLoaded Lead: Anselm Kiefer in the Collection of the Israel Museum, Sharon Tager and Adina Kamien (The Israel Museum, Jerusalem)12. Anthony Caro: Lead and Wood Sculptures. 1980-1989, Karen Wilkin (independent scholar)13. The New British Sculpture and the Poetics and Pragmatics of Lead, Jon Wood (independent scholar)14. Organizing Against an Invisible Threat. Lead According to Futurefarmers and Mel Chin, Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) 15. An Interview with Daniela Rivera: The weight of lead and painting beyond the surface, Silvia Bottinelli (Tufts University, USA) and Sharon Hecker (independent scholar)
https://leonardo.info/review/2021/08/lead-in-modern-and-contemporary-art?gclid=Cj0KCQjwlOmLBhCHARIsAGiJg7mRufRhbaH-1mUZ4TjC_LcTHnqqwLo_YBlv1a72UZ59et6fsEZ4Lt0aAgMqEALw_wcB
In the first section, the reader will find papers that explore the theoretical intersections of art and food, Food art’s historical root of Futurism, and the ways in which food carries gendered meaning in popular film. The following sections analyze how artists challenge mainstream ideas through food in a variety of scenarios. Starting from a focus on the body and subjectivity, the authors zoom out to look at the domestic sphere, and finally examine the role of the public sphere.
The papers included in The Taste of Art consider numerous case studies, by devoting particular attention to artists like, among others: Daniel Spoerri, Dieter Roth, Joseph Beuys, Al Ruppersberg, Alison Knowles, Martha Rosler, Paul McCarthy, Luciano Fabro, Carries Mae Weems, Peter Fischli and David Weiss, Janine Antoni, Liza Lou, and Natalie Jeremijenko.
https://teseo.unitn.it/palinsesti/issue/view/155
Vol.2 will be available in March 2021.
Both volumes examine women's art and criticism in postwar Italy through the rediscovery of a variety of case studies and discourses. The first issue, for example, includes articles about feminist photography, public art in urban settings, visual poetry, kitchen design, painting, sculpture, artist books and more. Recurrent themes question traditional women's roles and identities by deconstructing domesticity, sexuality, authorship, and personal narratives. Vol.1 presents contributions by Giovanna Zapperi, Imma Forino, Cristina Casero, Caterina Iaquinta, Raffaella Perna, and Maria Bremer, whose diverse professional and academic backgrounds provide a multifaceted representation of postwar Italian art and criticism.
Italian critics’ ability to fully appreciate individual artistic intentions varied, depending on the conditions under which they encountered the artworks themselves. Some, like Lionello Venturi,
Marisa Volpi, Germano Celant, or Francesca Alinovi, spent extensive periods of time in the United States. This experience allowed them a more genuine exchange with local artists and art professionals, which resulted in a more nuanced understanding of the American context. Others, like Roberto Longhi, Carlo Ludovico Ragghianti, Giulio Carlo Argan, and Enrico Crispolti mostly viewed American art through photographic reproductions and traveling exhibitions in Europe. In such cases, the critics’ analysis tended to be more impacted by theoretical schemas, and they interpreted the artworks using critical categories that were proper to European art-historical discourses.
Starting in the 1960s, transatlantic travel became more accessible, allowing a more frequent exchange between American and European artists, curators, and writers. For example, the African-American curator Henry Martin was involved in the Arte Povera experience, participated in the Italian itinerant theater company Lo Zoo, and later collaborated with artist Gianfranco Baruchello at Agricola Cornelia—a project at the boundary of art and farming. An increasing number of exhibitions featured both Italian and international artists, who seemed to adopt common goals and similar language. Also, the publication of Italian criticism in both Italian and English became more customary starting in the late 1970s, an indication that the intended public of Italian texts encompassed international readers.
It must be noted that a similar blending of intellectual engagement and hands on practice characterized the life of militant thinkers, not only artists, in 1960s and 1970s Italy.
On the one hand, copyright provides authors with monetary recognition for their work. On the other hand, it limits the circulation of such work and its opportunity to generate new discourse.
The absence of shared international policies and the high costs of image reproduction rights can compromise the quality of art historical research and affect the very existence of art history as we know it.
Comparing Levasti’s paintings with contemporary visual culture allows an understanding of the artist’s unique perspective. Popular magazines represent housewives as modern and isolated in the home, however Levasti’s female characters continue to perform traditional tasks in communal settings until the 1960s. There are no washing machines, but women doing the laundry together at a public fountain; there are no sewing machines, but girls mending dresses on their deck.
This iconographical choice might be read as a form of nostalgia, reinforced by Levasti’s constant reference to medieval art. However, the scenes depicted by the artist are not unrealistic. Statistics confirm that appliances were not widespread in the post World War II context, though their availability was increasing in the late 1950s.
The topics addressed by Muntadas, Urbonas and Bottinelli include: the architecture of academic buildings; curatorial choices and their intent to represent current public art discourses; social media and new technologies as sites for public interventions; the difficult coexistence of openness and surveillance in such environments; power dynamics within the university; the pedagogical and research turns in art; the role of failure in the process of learning and speculation; and travel as a way to expose the students to diverse understandings of public space. The conversation also casts light on specific projects by Muntadas and Urbonas.
mostly portrayed adult women as housewives and mothers, whose primary responsibility was feeding the family. Images
of women in the kitchen were ubiquitous in the visual culture of the late 1950s and early 1960s, which often represented
them as caught between tradition and modernity. Trendy magazine columns, images printed on the packages displayed in
supermarkets or neighborhood stores, as well as traditional social habits asked women to allow an external model to
shape their behavior in the domestic realm. Creativity was hardly presented as a quality of the ideal woman before a
seminal marketing campaign promoted by Barilla in 1964. However, female consumers were not always passive
followers of the guidelines delineated by others. Looking at the use of the historic cookbooks owned by the Biblioteca
Gastronomica Academia Barilla in Parma, Italy, gives us a hint of the independence with which at least some female
consumers related to standardized messages, partially resisting them even before gender equality become an open battle
in the mid-1960s. This resistance reflects religious, political and social values, which competed with the rise of
consumerism.
Keywords: Modern Italy, Industrial Food, Recipe Books, Gender Identity, Resistance, Visual Culture
Abstract:
This paper examines the representation of activities that were associated with domestic life in Post-war Italian Art. My perspective is grounded in Henri Lefebvre’s argument that it is through such actions that we appropriate and produce space, and shape our identity in relation to it.
Housekeeping as well as food preparation and consumption are the main focus in this paper. I will look at case studies that represent each group of actions in the span of three decades, roughly from the 1950s to the 1970s.
The discussion of housekeeping will be inspired by the following works: Fillide Levasti, "Giorno del Bucato in una Casa Popolare" (1950); Luciano Fabro, "Pavimento-Tautologia" (1967); Mirella Bentivoglio,
"Lapide Per Una Casalinga" (1974).
Food preparation and consumption will be discussed through: Maria Lai, "Il Pane", 1955 ca.; Lucia Marcucci,
"L’appetito Vien Mangiando" (1963); and Global Tools (Survival), Workshop
in Sambuca (1974).
My analysis will consider how shifting socio-cultural contexts, or at times the reaction to them, were interrelated with artistic interpretations. In order to show how artworks were in dialogue with contemporaneous discourses on the domestic, I will compare them with visual culture (advertisements, commercials, magazines, film), which can offer an understanding of normative models of home-life. In addition, I will compare artistic interpretations with personal narratives, which can be sampled through home movies, diaries, and annotated recipe books.
My overall argument is that the immediate post-war aspiration to the comfort of the private sphere, especially for women, went hand in hand with an enhanced condition of vulnerability, which was questioned by both feminism and counterculture in the late 1960s and 1970s.
private space. The ambiguous perception of the boundaries
between public and private questioned cultural ideas of domesticity and property. A similar
subversion of the presumption of separate spheres intersects the art discourse; this is perhaps best
seen in a selection of works by Ugo La Pietra and Gianni Pettena. For example, Pettena’s
Laundry (1969) and Portable Chairs (1971), and La Pietra’s Reappropriation of the city (1977),
Art in the social realm (1976-77), and Interior/Exterior (1977-78), reflect on the disconnection
between individuals and the public space, which is reclaimed by performing domestic actions in
the public sphere, or by literally inserting interior furnishings into exterior architecture. Arguing
for a necessary dialogue between inside and outside, citizen and social fabric, Pettena and La
Pietra contribute to the development of tools for radical design: they reject the utopia of progress
associated with modernism, inventing an ephemeral alphabet of intervention in the build
environment.
La Pietra and Pettena’s strategies of active resistance have parallels in the thought of theorists
like Marcuse, Lefebvre, and de Certeau, among others.
These thinkers articulate the possibility of opposition to oppressive societies; the
performative quality of the production of space; and the centrality of the everyday in shaping
society.
The goal of this article is to understand La Pietra and Pettena’s works as a contribution to this
theoretical discourse, instead of looking at their work as mere application of theories formulated by
others.
While valuing the role of philosophy in the interpretation of the artworks’ cultural and social
role, this paper also argues that artists, designers and architects themselves were not passive
executors of other intellectuals’ ideas, rather they were formulators of ideas and practices in
dialogue with scholarly and critical theories circulating in their same context.
This paper, the result of a sustained collaboration between Bottinelli and Hecker, discusses the artist’s use of aluminum and lead to add another layer to the understanding of the co-existing and sometimes conflicting meanings in Merz’s sculpture.
https://philamuseum.org/calendar/event-series/production-self-conversations-about-marisa-merz
More at...
https://recallthisbook.org/2020/01/17/silvia-bottinelli-food-art-food-art/#more-865
Tuesday, June 25, 2019
11.00 a.m.
Thinkers such as Gaston Bachelard, Henri Lefebvre, and Joanne Hollows, among others, reflect on the personal and social meanings of the home. Demonstrating the relevance of domestic cultures to both lived experience and academic discourse, they argue that the home— and the interactions with and within it— contributes to shape our identity. This talk applies such theoretical frame to the representation of domestic activities in Italian art and visual culture from the 1940s to the 1970s. It compares artworks with contemporaneous popular media to show forms of dynamic negotiation between personal narratives and societal expectations. Within a diverse range of case studies, particular attention is given to artworks created by women, as their critical relationship with domestic experiences was often central to their art practice during and after WWII. Examples include works by Fillide Levasti, Antonietta Raphaël Mafai, Maria Lai, Lucia Marcucci, Ketty La Rocca, and Mirella Bentivoglio; as well as Cesare Tacchi, Lamberto Pignotti, and Gilberto Zorio. The result is a mosaic of perspectives that highlight individual sensitivities as much as generational and gender differences in the visual interpretation of the home.
Scientific organization: Giorgia Gastaldon
La storia postbellica dell’arte italiana è profondamente segnata dagli equilibri geopolitici e culturali della guerra fredda, e da quello che potremmo chiamare il marketing delle identità culturali. Con gli strumenti della filologia visiva e un’attenta critica delle fonti diviene possibile avviare un proficuo dialogo tra la storia dell’arte e la storia politica e sociale tout court sui temi dell’identità nazionale e del “nation-building”. La difficile ricerca di nuove e plausibili definizioni identitarie all’indomani della guerra, il dibattito sui modelli di sviluppo negli anni della ricostruzione, le differenti opzioni ideologiche e i conflitti di idee nel decennio del boom e della contestazione pervadono il discorso secondario, aleggiano attorno alle opere e contribuiscono a modellarne tecniche e retoriche in una misura sinora non sempre registrata.
La storiografia angloamericana si è interessata all’arte italiana postbellica in anni recenti, e con pieno merito, sollevando problemi, invocando nuove prospettive storiografiche, dispiegando confronti. E’ tuttavia inevitabile che la ricostruzione mostri rigidità ideologiche e angolature su cui è utile riflettere, anche per la mancanza della traduzione delle fonti in lingua inglese, che rischia sovente di sbilanciare o appiattire il discorso sui pochi testi disponibili.
Lungi dall’attestarsi sulla schematicità di posizioni ideologiche riassunte nella contrapposizione “fascismo|antifascismo”, l’arte italiana degli anni Sessanta-Settanta cerca, spesso con successo, di definire una propria collocazione nel contesto internazionale, ripristinare un dialogo in parte interrotto con le avanguardie storiche e i Maestri entre-deux-guerres e innovare sul piano specificamente formale.
Si tratta adesso, esauritasi per ovvie ragioni cronologiche la stagione della critica militante e venuti a maturità gli studi delle fonti documentarie, di sperimentare una posizione critica terza, mirata ad avvicinare le opere sul duplice presupposto di una loro autonoma (benché certo non irrelata) capacità di dichiarazione; e a procurare all’arte italiana postbellica una connoisseurship specifica, tale da spingere la ricerca, ove necessario, oltre la fedeltà all’egodocumento in direzione di un’indagine compiutamente storiografica.
Il progetto del numero monografico di Predella si propone come seminario di riflessione aperto a contributi internazionali. Ci auguriamo che possano trovarvi spazio stimolanti prospettive di indagine per lo studio dell’arte e la critica d’arte italiana dal dopoguerra a oggi; e che una nuova generazione di studi abbia qui un suo momento di cristallizzazione.
This book is the result of a four-semester research commitment of a selection of SMFA-Tufts students, who attended my course "Food As Sculpture".
The Italian Art Society (IAS) seeks proposals for IAS-sponsored sessions at the annual meeting of the interdisciplinary American Association of Italian Studies (AAIS). In 2019, the conference will take place from 14-16 March at Wake Forest University, NC.
In keeping with the mission of the AAIS, sessions that approach Italian Studies through interdisciplinary lenses and represent a range of interests and time periods are particularly welcome. For IAS-sponsored sessions, topics which engage with Italian art across time or which are broadly conceived to also include architecture, cinema, etc., are of special interest.
IAS members interested in putting together a panel should submit a brief abstract (100 words max.), a session title, a short list of potential or desired speakers (they need not be confirmed), and a brief CV of up to three pages. Send materials by 10 November 2018 to [email protected].
Submit Session Proposals to IAS by: 10 November 2018
Submit Session Proposals to AAIS by: 1 December 2018
Submit Completed Sessions to AAIS by: 15 January 2019
American Association for Italian Studies (AAIS) 2020 [https://aais.wildapricot.org]
March 26-28 2020, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ [https://aais.wildapricot.org/conference_guidelines]
The Italian Art Society (IAS) seeks proposals for IAS-sponsored sessions at the annual meeting of the American Association of Italian Studies (AAIS).
In keeping with the mission of the AAIS, sessions that approach Italian Studies through interdisciplinary lenses and represent a range of interests and time periods are particularly welcome. Topics that are broadly conceived to include architecture, cinema, mass media, etc., are of special interest.
IAS members interested in putting together a panel should submit the following items:
• session title
• abstract (100 words max.), to be forwarded to the AAIS in the event of selection
• short list of potential or desired speakers (they need not be confirmed)
• a sentence or two contextualizing the proposal; explain the relevance/importance of the session and the related expertise of the
organizer(s) and speakers
• brief CV (1–3 pp)
Send materials by 10 November 2019 to [email protected].
Submit Session Proposals to IAS by: 10 November 2019
Submit Session Proposals to AAIS by: 1 December 2019
Submit Completed Sessions to AAIS by: 20 December 2019
IAS-Sponsored session (https://www.italianartsociety.org/conferences-lectures/ias-at-caa/)
College Art Association (CAA) Annual Conference in New York City, 10-13 February 2021
IAS Deadline: 28 February 2020
The Italian Art Society (IAS) is now accepting proposals for one sponsored session (1.5 hours) at CAA to be held in New York City 10-13 February 2021.
IAS members interested in putting together a panel on any topic of Italian art (broadly conceived) should send a brief abstract (250 words max.), session title, a short list of potential or desired speakers (they need not be confirmed), the name of the chair(s) with email addresses and affiliation, and a one-page CV.
We will consider both completed panels and those still seeking speakers.
Please submit all materials to the IAS Program Committee Chair ([email protected]) by 28 February 2020.
Please also see the IAS Submission Guidelines at http://italianartsociety.org/conferences-lectures/ias-conference-submission-guidelines/
Sixteenth Century Society & Conference (https://sixteenthcentury.org)
Baltimore MD, 29 October-1 November 2020
Renaissance Baltimore Harborplace Hotel
IAS Deadline: 10 March 2020
The IAS is seeking complete session proposals that address any issue relevant to Italian art and architecture during the long sixteenth century. The Sixteenth Century Society & Conference (SCSC) was founded to promote scholarship on the early modern era (c.1450-1600), and actively encourages the participation of international scholars as well as the integration of younger colleagues into the academic community. IAS members interested in putting together a panel or linked panels should send a brief abstract (250 words max.); session title; a list of speakers with their affiliations and paper titles; and the name of the chair(s) with email address(es), affiliation(s), and one-page CV(s) to the IAS Program Committee Chair ([email protected]) by 10 March 2020.
Please note that the SCSC welcomes graduate student speakers who are within one or two years of defending their dissertations. However, all sessions must include at least one speaker who has received the PhD or other terminal degree, and predoctoral speakers should present dissertation research, not term papers.
Completed panels are due to SCSC (date to be announced)
https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gifPlease also see the IAS Submission Guidelines at http://italianartsociety.org/conferences-lectures/ias-conference-submission-guidelines/