Uso de Isaías Da Palavra "Ramo" Ou Nazareno: Prefácio

Fazer download em docx, pdf ou txt
Fazer download em docx, pdf ou txt
Você está na página 1de 12

Uso de Isaías da palavra "Ramo" ou Nazareno

Por Fred P Miller


Prefácio
Este estudo é muito melhor visualizado com a escrita hebraica real para que as comparações
sejam evidentes. Há um texto hebraico com transliteração aqui. Se o texto hebraico for
desconhecido e confuso para você, tente ler o texto transliterado abaixo do texto hebraico.
A interpretação da profecia é necessariamente mística e milagrosa por sua
própria natureza. Os limites do tempo e da eternidade foram quebrados no
momento em que o Todo-Poderoso nos disse o futuro antes de ser vivido.
Como exemplo em Isaías, um desses momentos surpreendentes é a nomeação
de Ciro como aquele que reconstruiria o templo. Os detalhes precognitivos são
dados não apenas antes de Ciro viver, mas antes que a nação fosse levada
cativa e o templo destruído pelos babilônios. Assim, perscrutar a profecia é
como perscrutar o momento transcendental. Quando o sucesso é o
companheiro daquele que busca a revelação da verdade que não está
prontamente disponível na superfície, é uma experiência semi-mística. No
entanto, o intérprete da profecia não é como aqueles que seguem a Cabala. O
estudante de Khabbalah procura revelação especial em significados ocultos
sob as próprias palavras. A Cabala como sistema descarta o significado
natural, e um misticismo diferente, mais próximo do espiritismo, com
espectros e aparições fantasmagóricas é um possível apetrecho para a
descoberta do segundo e, para ele, mais importante, a Cabala, ou "significado
oculto". ." Eu rejeito o conceito de significado oculto no sentido da
Khabbalah. O verdadeiro intérprete da profecia busca, nas visões, um
transporte para além das experiências naturais ordinárias. Mas ele busca por
meios naturais e comuns estudar o significado literal de palavras proféticas
escritas que foram escritas em um período de tempo precognitivo. Ele então
passa a descobrir seu cumprimento no tempo histórico.
O que se segue, portanto, não é uma aventura na não-realidade mística, mas
uma tentativa de obter mais significado na profecia a partir do significado
literal do texto real na língua hebraica que desafia a tradução. Isaías tem
muitas nuances que não podem ser traduzidas. Estes são geralmente
associados a um irônico "jogo de palavras". Essa característica de estilo é um
importante mecanismo literário no estilo da escrita de Isaías.
Isaías é conhecido pela hipérbole poética e pelo uso de jogos de palavras. O
significado do texto muitas vezes depende desses artifícios literários
intraduzíveis. Algumas vezes, são apenas palavras rimadas que não rimam na
tradução e, portanto, o jogo de palavras é perdido. Em outras ocasiões, há o
uso de "duplo sentido" (duplo sentido)ou uma semelhança no som e no
significado que continua a ideia no contexto de uma passagem, pois a forma
da palavra pode continuar a ser usada na passagem para transmitir o que está
sendo falado. (Isso é observado pelo comentário de Keil e Delitch sobre Isaías
no uso dos termos que são repetidos em Isaías 8:22 - 9: 1. Há um trocadilho
com as palavras mu'aph e mutasaq , que são devidamente comentadas por Keil
como um jogo de som e significado semelhantes palavras.) Quando o
dispositivo de "duplo sentido" está conectado a palavras que têm configuração
escrita e/ou som semelhantes, não é possível mostrá-lo na tradução, pois as
palavras traduzidas não terão tais semelhanças e o significado original é
obscurecido ou pelo menos certo, a menos que nos digam. O artifício literário
do "jogo de palavras" é mais pronunciado em Isaías do que em qualquer outro
profeta. Rawlinson disse:
"Play upon words is also a common feature in Hebrew literature but only a few of the sacred
writers use it so frequently or give it such prominence as Isaiah...As, however, this ornament,
depending generally on the assonance of the Hebrew words, is necessarily lost in translation and
can only be appreciated by a Hebrew scholar, we do not propose further to dwell on it."*
Mesmo que a sutileza do uso do jogo de palavras se perca na tradução, ele
não deve ser considerado um ornamento. Faz parte do processo de
pensamento inspirado e, pelo menos em um caso, é um veículo de revelação
milagrosa. O uso que Isaías faz da palavra traduzida como “ramo” em 11:1 é
quase cabalístico. A palavra tem uma grande variedade de traduções
possíveis. Eufonicamente está ligado a Nazareno, Nazarenos ou Nazaré. É
traduzido manter, manter, guardado, vigia, vigilantes, sitiado, preservar,
preservador, coisas sutis, escondidas, monumentos e ramo. Na maioria dos
lugares é traduzido como "guardar", no sentido de guardar e manter algo
seguro. É traduzido como "ramo" em Isaías três vezes e uma vez em
Daniel. Isaías' O uso que o homem faz da palavra é surpreendente para um
crente e deve pelo menos despertar o interesse dos incrédulos. Quando
Isaías usa a palavra, há uma possibilidade quase completa de "duplo sentido"
ou "jogo de palavras" em contextos obviamente
messiânicos. Invariavelmente, eles apontam para Jesus como o Messias por
causa de sua ligação com Nazaré e porque ele é chamado de "o Nazareno"
até mesmo por seus detratores. Mateus referiu-se ao uso da palavra por
Isaías quando disse que a cidade natal de Jesus, Nazaré, foi o cumprimento
dos profetas. Invariavelmente, eles apontam para Jesus como o Messias por
causa de sua ligação com Nazaré e porque ele é chamado de "o Nazareno"
até mesmo por seus detratores. Mateus referiu-se ao uso da palavra por
Isaías quando disse que a cidade natal de Jesus, Nazaré, foi o cumprimento
dos profetas. Invariavelmente, eles apontam para Jesus como o Messias por
causa de sua ligação com Nazaré e porque ele é chamado de "o Nazareno"
até mesmo por seus detratores. Mateus referiu-se ao uso da palavra por
Isaías quando disse que a cidade natal de Jesus, Nazaré, foi o cumprimento
dos profetas.
Matthew 2:23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it
might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a
Nazarene.
There is no prophet in the Old Testament who states the Messiah will be
called a Nazarene! Matthew also says that the birth at Bethlehem fulfilled
"that which was spoken by the prophet." A verse can be found where this is
recorded in Micah 5:2. He also said that the flight into Egypt fulfilled "that
which was spoken by the prophet." That verse also can be found, it is in Hosea
11:1. But no verse in the Old Testament says "He shall be called a Nazarene."
Since Matthew knew that, then his words "which was spoken by the
prophets," indicate that there is no one prophet that makes the statement but
when you put together the bits and pieces of the verses in the Old Testament
about Nazareth and Nazarenes then the combination of those pieces make it
plain that Jesus was to be called a "Nazarene." Predicted, not by a prophet but
by a compilation of "the prophets."
Of particular interest is Isaiah's use of the Hebrew word "nazer"   or
"branch" and of "nazeroth"   which is obviously identical with
"Nazareth" in form. Isaiah uses other related forms of the same word which
have meaning when seeing them in their connection to Nazarene fulfillment of
"that which was spoken by the prophets." The same passages when translated
in different ways are mediocre in meaning but come alive when seen as
mystical conveyances of eternal truth. We will notice them more fully later
but first let us see how the passage in Matthew 2:23 fulfills "that which was
spoken by the prophets."
"His name is the Branch."
The prophecies in Zechariah of the one whose name is "the Branch," use
Joshua, the High Priest, as a symbol of the one to come. The symbol of the
Branch does not refer to Joshua himself. It is again important to have an
acquaintance with other "Branch" prophecies in the Old Testament if we are
to understand these in Zechariah.
There are two Hebrew words translated "Branch" in the branch prophecies.
The two Hebrew words for Branch are obviously interchanged. One is
"tsemach"   (transliterated zemach) used in all the verses for "branch"
except the major messianic link in Isaiah 11:1 (and two others in Isaiah and
one in Daniel already noted) where "natser,"   (transliterated Nazer) is
found. Jesus is called this latter word literally. The hometown of Jesus is
Nazareth (Fem. plural of Nazer is Nazeroth). Many religious Jews will not
mention Jesus' name. They certainly will not call him Christ (Messiah) since
calling him Christ would be an oblique confession of what they do not
believe. He is most often referred to by pious Jews as "The Nazarene" (Heb.
Notsri,   , and Christians as the Nazarenes or Notsriym,   , There is
no common corresponding word "Christian" in modern Hebrew usage.
Practicing Jewish scholars call Jesus Christ "The Nazarene" and Christians the
"Nazarenes." The Nazarene literally means "the one who is the branch!"
Consequently his name is "The Branch," literally fulfilling this prophecy and
so called by those who believe in him least.
Other Commentators have seen The word NOTSRIYM as referring to
Christians
It is helpful to know that this writer is not alone is making these observations
about this word.
It is of interest that the word NOTSRIYM has been seen as an allusion to the
word "Christians" previous to our generation. Commentator John Dill, who
was born in the 1600's made the point by quoting two other Bible scholars
extant in his time.
Both (one a Jewish convert) as Gill does, see the possibility of Christians
being named in Jer. 31:6, which passage which we give more attention to
below. see it click here Use the back button to return here.
Gill's comment: that the watchmen upon the mount Ephraim; the same with
the mountains of Samaria; for Samaria was the head or metropolis of
Ephraim, Isa_7:9; and these are the watchmen that kept the vines there,
Jer_31:5; for the allusion is not to watchmen of states and cities, but to
watchers of vineyards, and to such the ministers of the Gospel are compared,
Son_1:6. Grotius thinks there is an allusion in the word "Notzerim" to the title
of Nazarenes, given to Christ and his followers; and Abarbinel* the Jew on
the place observes, that the prophet, by the Holy Ghost, foresaw that the
Romans would believe in Jesus of Nazareth, and therefore would be called
Nazarenes from him; see Act_24:5; so that Christian ministers may be well
thought to be here intended: who
shall cry, arise ye; lift up their voice like a trumpet, and cry aloud to persons
as asleep, or in dead and lifeless frames, to awake, arouse, and rise up, and
shake off their sloth and indolence, saying: and let us go up to Zion unto the
Lord our God;
*More commonly called "Abravanel" or "The Abarbanel."(1437-1508)
"Christian scholars appreciated the convenience of Abravanel's commentaries, and often used them
when preparing their own exegetical writing. This may have had something to do with Abravanel’s
openness towards the Christian religion, since he worked closely with Messianic ideas found within
Judaism. Because of this, Abravanel’s works were translated and distributed within the world of Christian
scholarship." See more here.

(Zec. 3:8) Hear now, O Joshua the High Priest, you, and your fellows that
sit before you: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth
my servant the Branch (Zec. 6:12) And speak to him, saying, Thus speaks
the LORD of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The Branch;
and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the Temple of the
LORD.
"He shall build the Temple of the LORD." The Branch refers to the
Messiah. The Temple is the kingdom of the Messiah. It is clear that Gentiles
have trusted in the LORD since the time of the Nazarene (Branch) through the
building of the church done by Jesus the Nazarene who as we have shown is
literally "the Branch."
These two references to the Branch must speak of the same person. It is
obvious that Joshua who is being addressed cannot be the branch which he is
told will come in the future. Joshua, who bears the same human name (Joshua
is the Hebrew form of the Greek Jesus), is a symbol and type of the "Branch"
because he had a leading part in building the second Temple which was under
construction when this message was given to him. The Messiah is spoken of
here as in other Branch prophecies, all of which follow:
(Isa. 4:2) In that day shall the branch of the LORD be beautiful and
glorious, and the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and comely for them
that are escaped of Israel. (Isa. 11:1) And there shall come forth a rod out
of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots; (Isa. 11:2)
And the spirit of the LORD shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and
understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and
of the fear of the LORD; (Isa. 11:10) And in that day there shall be a root of
Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to it shall the Gentiles
seek; and his rest shall be glorious. (Jer. 23:5) Behold, the days come, says
the LORD, that I will raise to David a righteous Branch, and a King shall
reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. (Jer.
23:6) In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and
this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR
RIGHTEOUSNESS. (Jer. 33:15) In those days, and at that time, will I
cause the Branch of righteousness to grow up to David; and he shall
execute judgment and righteousness in the land. (Jer. 33:16) In those days
shall Judah be saved, and Jerusalem shall dwell safely; and this is the name
wherewith he shall be called, The LORD our righteousness.
According to these verses, the man, "the Branch," to come shall be of the
house of David, he will be a judge, he will be a king, he will be a priest, he
will be the Lord Our Righteousness, he will save Israel and Judah, he will
build the Temple of God, in him will the Gentiles trust. Attention given to the
context of these Branch prophecies will show that the Branch is the same
person who will fulfill the David prophecies. They clearly refer to the Messiah
and Jesus of Nazareth has astonishingly paralleled these predictions, so
wonderfully fulfilled, yet unwittingly completed by those who reject him.
Attention given to the context of these Branch prophecies will show that the
Branch clearly refers to the Messiah, and Jesus has astonishingly paralleled
these predictions, especially the last, that is, "in him will the Gentiles trust."
See Zec. 3:8; 6:12 above and other branch prophecies. Two words
( "tsemach"   and "natser"  ) are used in these prophecies. The second
word is related to Nazareth and Nazarene as in Isa. 11:1 and other places
referring to the Messiah: those are Isa. 1:8; 14:19; 26:3; 27:3; especially
messianic are 42:6; 48:6; 49:6; 49:8; and also see 60:21; 65:4. The Holy Spirit
called the name of Nazareth in Isa. 48:6. It is these passages with those in
Zechariah that Matthew had in mind when he said in Matthew 2:23 "And he
came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was
spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a "Nazarene."
Below are all the verses where the word is used by Isaiah. One or two are not
as obviously connected with the messianic event but the connection is there.
In some cases the connection is so startling that no other possible solution
seems to present itself. What else is extraordinary is that of all the multiple
uses of this word in the scriptures where it has its most common meaning of
preserving or keeping, there is no possibility of "double meaning." In Isaiah
the use of double meaning is unavoidable in contexts that refer to the Messiah.
This is also true as well for two occurrences in Jeremiah. All these are noted
below.
Isaiah's Use of the Word "Nazer."
.1. Isaiah 1:8 And the daughter of Zion is left as a cottage in a vineyard, as
a lodge in a garden of cucumbers, as a "besieged" city.

8. Ve-nothrah Bath Tsion ke-sukkah be-carem ke-melunah bi-miqshah


ke-'iyr netsurah.
A palavra "natser" da qual derivam as palavras Nazaré e Nazareno é aqui
traduzida como "sitiado". Esta é a primeira de muitas passagens em Isaías
onde as profecias nazarenas são encontradas em um jogo de palavras. Esta é
uma predição da verdadeira Sião sendo rejeitada por seus habitantes como
uma casa de menor importância, como uma pequena torre de vigia ou abrigo
de jardim, não a casa principal ou como uma cidade nazarena ou cristã, não
realmente judaica. Este versículo fala da negligência judaica da verdadeira
Sião enquanto eles perseguem falsas riquezas e objetivos terrenos. Os
palácios de Sião são tratados como se fossem galpões de jardim ou uma
cidade nazarena. O conceito de cidade sitiada abrange pouco do pensamento
na comparação. Isaías é muito preciso em seu uso de comparações e não
seria culpado por esta comparação mista de Sião sendo tratada com desdém
e evitada por seus habitantes como se fosse um edifício desprezível como
uma pequena casa de jardineiro ou um galpão. Evitar um galpão de jardim ou
uma pequena cabana é um ato de discriminação que exige que aquele que
discrimina faça uma escolha. Nenhuma escolha é feita para evitar uma cidade
sitiada, mas é evitada por necessidade, não por preconceito. Você poderia, se
quisesse, entrar no galpão de um jardineiro. Você não poderia entrar em uma
cidade sitiada, mesmo que quisesse. Os judeus rejeitaram Sião como se
estivesse "abaixo deles" Assim, a tradução "uma cidade sitiada" não é uma
comparação tão provável quanto o significado místico de
"Netsurah" Nenhuma escolha é feita para evitar uma cidade sitiada, mas é
evitada por necessidade, não por preconceito. Você poderia, se quisesse,
entrar no galpão de um jardineiro. Você não poderia entrar em uma cidade
sitiada, mesmo que quisesse. Os judeus rejeitaram Sião como se estivesse
"abaixo deles" Assim, a tradução "uma cidade sitiada" não é uma
comparação tão provável quanto o significado místico de
"Netsurah" Nenhuma escolha é feita para evitar uma cidade sitiada, mas é
evitada por necessidade, não por preconceito. Você poderia, se quisesse,
entrar no galpão de um jardineiro. Você não poderia entrar em uma cidade
sitiada, mesmo que quisesse. Os judeus rejeitaram Sião como se estivesse
"abaixo deles" Assim, a tradução "uma cidade sitiada" não é uma
comparação tão provável quanto o significado místico de "Netsurah"   
como uma cidade "nazarena" ou como o particípio passivo é mais
literalmente traduzido, "uma cidade nazarizada"; que pelos judeus poderia
ser evitado por desrespeito .
2. Isaías 26:3 Tu "manterás" em perfeita paz aquele cuja mente está firme
em ti: porque ele confia em ti.

3. yatser samuk ti[n]tsor shalom shalom kiy be-ka batuach


Isso é traduzido de maneira mais apropriada: "Você preservará o homem de
propósito inabalável em perfeita paz, porque ele confia em você". A conexão
do Nazareno é menos óbvia aqui. Mas aquele que é o Nazareno é o portador
da paz perfeita na qual ele é guardado pelo Pai. Ou, mais especificamente,
Deus "nazarizará" (tornará como Jesus) aquele cuja mente é firme em
propósito.
3. Isaiah 27:3 I the LORD do "keep" it; I will water it every moment: lest
any hurt it, I will "keep" it night and day.

3. 'ani YHWH notserah le-rega'iym 'ashqen-nah phen yiphqod 'aleyha laylah


va-yom 'a[n]ts-tsren-nah
God's protection of Zion is spoken of here but in a Nazer context. The text
could easily translate. "I will make Zion Nazarene."
4. Isaiah 42:6 I the LORD have called thee in righteousness, and will hold
thine hand, and will "keep" thee, and give thee for a covenant of the
people, for a light of the Gentiles;
6. 'ani YHWH qar'atiyka be-tsedeq ve'achezeq be-yareka
ve- 'e[n]tsreka ve-'at-teneka le-beriyth 'am le-'or goiym
O uso da frase "Eu te guardarei" em hebraico pode ser "Farei de você um
Nazar" ou Nazareno. Isso está no contexto da vinda do Messias sendo
também uma aliança e uma luz para os gentios. Diga-me, caro leitor, que
judeu relacionado com a palavra Nazar teve maior influência do que Jesus de
Nazaré sobre os gentios?
5. Isaías 48:6 Tu ouviste, vê tudo isso; e não quereis declará-lo? Desde
então, tenho te mostrado coisas novas, até mesmo "coisas ocultas", e você
não as sabia.

6. shama'ta chazeh kulah ve-atem ha-lo' tagiydu. hishma'atiyka chadashoth


u-netsaroth ve-lo' yeda'tam.
Nazareth is literally named in this extraordinary passage. "Nazuroth   is
translated "hidden things" in the KJV. The context has God telling us that he
will tell things that they do not suspect but that after they happen you will
know that he is able to show the future. He says "I have shown you new things
even Nazareth." What an incredible verse that had to be in the mind of
Matthew when he penned the words in Matt. 2:23.
See Isaiah commentary on this verse.
6. Isaiah 49:6 And he said, Is it a light thing that thou shouldest be my
servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the "preserved of
Israel:" I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou mayest
be  "my salvation" unto the end of the earth.

6. vayo'amer naqal mihayothka liy 'eved le-haqiym 'eth shivtey Ya'aqov u-


netsurey yisrael, u-nethatiyka le'or goyim le-hayoth yeshu'a-tiy 'ad qetsah
ha-'arets
This remarkable passage is obviously messianic. Especially since the one
spoken of is to be the "light of the Gentiles" and salvation is to the ends of the
earth. What is not obvious is the Hebrew use of words in this verse. The return
of the "preserved" of Israel is another of Isaiah's use of the Nazarene words in
messianic contexts of which this is one. Preserved of Israel is notsrey yisrael.
This would be rendered "Nazarenes of Israel" or as the more common modern
Jewish usage, "Christians of Israel."
The Hebrew here literally says :"I give you as a light to the Gentiles to be my
yeshua' to the end of the earth." The Hebrew form is the name of Jesus or
Yeshua. The coincidence is startling when this verse is read in Hebrew. "Is
your being my servant to establish the tribes of Jacob and restore the Israeli
Nazarenes a light thing, when I have also given you as a light of the Gentiles
to be my Jesus to the ends of the earth." Make what you will of this verse but
that is what it says.
7. Isaiah 49:8 Thus saith the LORD, In an acceptable time have I heard
thee, and in a day of "salvation" have I helped thee: and "I will preserve
thee," and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to
cause to inherit the desolate heritages;

8. koh 'amar YHWH be'eth ratson 'aniytiyka u-beyom yeshu'ah 'azarityka


ve-'e[n]tsarka ve-'ettaneka leberiyth 'am, le-haqiym 'erets le-hanechiyl
nachaloth shomamoth.

This continues the use of the word Nazar ( ) which was just introduced in
verse 6. The passage in the same context as the preceding one is so obviously
Messianic. The repeated use of the word "Nazer or Notser"   (which
Matthew 2:23 says is spoken by the prophets in reference to Jesus growing up
in Nazareth) is further extension of Isaiah's use of "play" on this word to
reveal prophetic truth. It is extraordinary to say the least. If one were to write
in English, "In the day of Jesus I've helped you and I will make you a
Nazarene and I will give you for a covenant of the people," and then translate
that English sentence into Modern Hebrew it would read exactly as this much
of the text does here in verse 8.
Isaiah 65:4 Which remain among the graves, and lodge in the monuments,
which eat swine's flesh, and broth of abominable things is in their vessels;

ha-yoshviym ba-qevariym u-ban-netsuriym yaliynu ha-'okliym basar ha-


chaziyr piguliym keleyhem,
Notice that the construction is the same and could therefore be: "who dwell
among the graves and lodge among the Nazarenes." From the Jewish stand
point they are among the most despicable.
.Jeremiah 4:16 Make ye mention to the nations; behold, publish against
Jerusalem, that "watchers" come from a far country, and give out their
voice against the cities of Judah.
16. hazikiyru la-goyim hineh hashmiy'u 'al yerushalam, notsriym b'aiym
me'erets ha-mer-chaq va-yittenu 'al 'arey yehudah qolam.
This construction is precisely what a modern Hebrew writer would use to say
"Christians are coming from a far country. "Notsriym ba'iym me'erets ha-mer-
chaq"   If this construction were in an Israeli
newspaper it would be read as "Christians are coming from a far country."
The phrase ('al yerushalam)   is translated "against Jerusalem."
This construction does not necessarily imply an attack. It could just as easily
be translated in or upon Jerusalem and the latter phrase in the verse would be
"in the cities of Judah." In that case the verse would read "Remind the nations,
behold, cause it to be heard in Jerusalem, Nazarenes (Christians) are coming
from a far land and they will give their voices upon the cities of Judah."
10. Jeremiah 31:6 For there shall be a day, that the "watchmen" upon the
mount Ephraim shall cry, Arise ye, and let us go up to Zion unto the LORD
our God.

6. kiy yesh yom, qare'u notsriym be-har 'ephrayim, qumu ve-na'alah tsiyon 'el


YHWH 'eloheynu.
Note first that in Hebrew neither "watchmen" nor "mount Ephraim" are definite. there is no definite
article with either.

The context of this chapter is one of the return of Israel who at the time of the
writing were "the Lost Ten Tribes." The prophecy promises a visit of
messengers in a messianic context to Samaria. Verse 31 of the same chapter
predicts the slaughter of the innocents in Bethlehem and thus places the
chapter after the birth of Jesus. Mount Ephraim is the region of Samaria where
most of the population lived. The context of the passage contains many events
that will be associated with "the day" or period leading up to the Nazarenes
calling out a message in mount Ephraim. These prophecies would include the
return of all the tribes to the land after the Babylonian captivity, the silent
years of the growth of the second commonwealth at the end of which the
Messiah would come and according to verses 31 to 34 of this chapter he will
make a new covenant with his people. This is quoted by the writer of Hebrews
as meaning the Christian covenant when Sinai gave place to Golgotha. In that
period the verse we are looking at says that Nazarenes would invite
Samaritans to Zion. The verse should be translated "There will be a day when
Christians will cry in Mount Ephraim, Get up, let us go up to Zion, to the
LORD our God." See Acts 1:8 where Jesus set the stage for the fulfillment of
this verse.
The Same Word "N TS R" is Translated Branch in Four Places in Isaiah.
11. Isaiah 11:1 And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse,
and a "Branch" shall grow out of his roots:

1. ve-yatsa' choter migeza' yisay ve-natsar mish-sharashayv yiphrach.


This is a key messianic verse which show that the Tsemach Branch prophecies
and the Nazer Branch prophecies are linked and are one and the same because
they are both "David" prophecies. Both forms of Branch prophecies teach that
He is the son of David. Here the coming Nazarene is to be of the family of
Jesse who was the father of David. This verse makes it plain that the word
Nazer is to be linked to the Branch prophecies and that other occasions of its
use should be investigated. Just as every use of the word "branch" translated
from Tsemach" in the Bible is not in a messianic context and is therefore not a
revelation about the coming of the Messiah so also the use of Nazar will only
have such mystical connection in contexts that are clearly messianic. In some
of them, like this one, the connection is perfectly clear. Jesus whose name is
the "Branch" is just so because Nazarene means "The Branch."
12. Isaiah 14:19 But thou art cast out of thy grave like an
abominable "branch," and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust
through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcass
trodden under feet.

19. ve-atah hashlakta miq-qibreka ke-natsar nith'av le-bush ha-rugiym


miso'amey cherev yordey 'el 'avney-bor ke-peger muvas.
Isaiah's use of comparisons in poetic vision is extensive and descriptive,
usually very much to the point. This comparison reveals little however in its
literalness. Babylon, who has enjoyed the position of primacy and wealth
among the nations, is to suffer rejection and be cast off like a corrupted dead
body or clothes that are ripped and bloody. These comparisons are to the point
. But how much does "a branch" fit this category? It is open to much
speculation and the connection is not immediate as are the other "to the point"
comparisons.. However take the mystic meaning of "nazar"   (branch) or
the "Nazarene." Babylon is to be treated like the Jews treat the "Notser" or
"Notsriy" or Nazarene,  --complete and ultimate rejection. This word
clearly refers to the Messiah in Isa. 11:1.
13. Isaiah 60:21 Thy people also shall be all righteous: they shall inherit the
land for ever, the "branch" of my planting, the work of my hands, that I
may be glorified.
21. ve-'ameka kullam tsadiyqiym le-'olam yiyrshu 'arets, natser masa'ay
ma'assah yaday le-hithpa'er'
Chapter 60 ought to begin in 59:20 above which says, And the Redeemer
shall come to Zion, and to them that turn from transgression in Jacob, says
the LORD. This makes it clear that what follows is a description of the
coming messianic Zion. This is supported by the mention of the Gentiles
bringing their strength to the renewed Zion in verses 3, 5, 11, and 16. The
Gentile motif is continued in the next chapter (61) which gives greater
description of the Messiah's mission.
It is in this context that Isaiah 60:21 is found. "Thy people" refers to the
inhabitants of the new Zion under the Messiah. The prophet says they will be
Nazarene of God's planting and that this will produce a great marvelling at
God. Le-hith-pa'aer   which is translated "that I may be glorified" is a
hithpiel infinitive. It is plurative and reciprocal or passive and it means "for
the purpose of producing a marvelling of me."
Indeed these verses that contain the word Nazer are pregnant with meaning
and it can not be mere coincidence that the word is in so many messianic
contexts. Since it is well known tradition that Matthew wrote originally in
Hebrew which was later translated into Greek, then it reasonably follows that
his knowledge of the Hebrew text would prompt him to be the only Gospel
writer to call attention to the fact that: he came and dwelt in a city called
Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He
shall be called a Nazarene.
* Rawlinson, G.; Commentary on Isaiah in Pulpit Commentary; Erdmans, pg xiv.
Return to Commentary Directory>
Return to Moellerhaus Home Page

Você também pode gostar