In T368610#10040333, @jrbs wrote:

In T368610#10040294, @Wong128hk wrote:

@jrbs may I know if the vote can start extend at anytime or need to wait until the end of UCoC poll, technically ?
If possible, please start extend from 5 Aug 00:00 UTC and end at 11 Aug 23:59 UTC. Thanks.

Yes, I think this is fine.

Could I please receive confirmation that there is consensus among the community to do this?

@jrbs may I know if the vote can start extend at anytime or need to wait until the end of UCoC poll, technically ?
If possible, please start extend from 5 Aug 00:00 UTC and end at 11 Aug 23:59 UTC. Thanks.

@jrbs Per consensus of B'crats, the poll need to be extended for a week in order to get a clear community consensus. Please note. Thank you.

In T342774#9315133, @jrbs wrote:

In T342774#9315132, @SCP-2000 wrote:

Just for note. The reason of cannot vote is that only the poll on the votewiki was extended, but the local one did not extended. Therefore, users cannot follow Special:SecurePoll link on the local wiki to vote. Thanks.

You are absolutely right. I have made this change and it should now work as expected.

If this is not acceptable, or you require additional time on the vote, please let me know @Wong128hk / @jimmyxu

In T342774#9309331, @jrbs wrote:

In T342774#9307956, @Stang wrote:

@Wong128hk A secure poll could not be edited once it has started, so I don't think a prolong is possible technically. The only way seems to be re-run an election.

It is possible, but only through the database.

In T342774#9307138, @Wong128hk wrote:

In T342774#9273760, @jrbs wrote:

In T342774#9272043, @Wong128hk wrote:

Just like the previous one (T318147): Please mark me and @jimmyxu as Scrutineers for the vote. Thank you.

You should both already have access.

thank you. vote 1 completed.

Re: vote 2
according local OS policy, 80% of support vote is needed to grant the access.
75 to 79% of support vote, traditionally, will be counted as borderline case.
Extension of voting period is considered to be one of legitimate solution.
After discussion with Jimmyxu, @jrbs could you please extend the voting period of vote 2 for 1 week.
Thank you.

I have done this as requested. It may result in some strangeness if the election was already tallied (I haven't tried tallying an election twice in this kind of scenario), so proceed with caution.

If necessary it should be pretty easy to simply create a new election.

In T342774#9273760, @jrbs wrote:

In T342774#9272043, @Wong128hk wrote:

Just like the previous one (T318147): Please mark me and @jimmyxu as Scrutineers for the vote. Thank you.

You should both already have access.

Just like the previous one (T318147): Please mark me and @jimmyxu as Scrutineers for the vote. Thank you.

Please mark me and @jimmyxu as Scrutineers for the vote. Thank you.

Community seemingly tends to have separate polls for each candidate according to the below linked discussion.

I'd like to confirm the results for "2022年5月中文维基百科管理员选举".
@jimmyxu see if you got any other comments. Thanks.

Confirmed. Please let me know what should I do next. Thanks.

One more clue: Jimmy, another OSer at zhwiki, who is capable to suppress a FLOW topic. i.e. having such a button on his screen.

I'm wondering why the problems cannot be solved by simply removing the b'crat flag from the angry community member or stolen account. why don't we keep things simple stupid? if the logic goes like this, do we need two CUer to CU; two OSer to OS? or we need to have two stewards together to do somethings?

so may I know what is the progress?

In T221933#5158038, @RazeSoldier wrote:

So setting $wgFlaggedRevsOverride=false is necessary and fits in the need and agreement in zhwiki.

Have a community consensus?

@RazeSoldier It seems that it is not necessary to disable $wgKartographerEnableMapFrame if applying the English Wikipedia Model on Chinese Wikipedia. Right?

• The requested name of the mailing list is [email protected]
• The purpose for creating the mailing list is to provide the perform for internal communication for bureaucrats of zh.wikipedia
• Initial list administrator's email address: [email protected]
• Secondary list administrator's email address: [email protected]

The consensus from the community of lzh.wikipedia is to keep the ability of editing .js/.css page in either MediaWiki or user namespace for sysop, even after the transition period. It also asks for the cancellation of establishment of new user group which named as "interface administrator" for lzh.wikipedia.

@RazeSoldier All the templates and modules starting with lowercase have been moved. Please have a check and deploy the patch.

@RazeSoldier could you please place the zh-hans logo under the track of /static/images/project-logos/ and make also the 1.5X and 2X versions for zh-hans one. Thank you.

please use https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikiquote-logo-zh-hant.svg for the logo. For zh-hans, I will handle it with local css. However, could you please place the zh-hans local under the track of /static/images/project-logos/ ? Moreover, how about 1.5X and 2X logo for high resolution screen?

In T199863#4439192, @Framawiki wrote:

Hello @Zest, is it a temporary change ?

• Vvjjkkii removed the point value for this task. << cannot be undone since what has been removed is unknown. Please undo it if you know what has been removed.

Vvjjkkii removed the point value for this task. << for this, it cannot be undone since don't know what has been removed... Please undo it if you know it. Thank you,

The rename has completed...