I keep getting logged out on my phone these days (while continuing to be logged in on my laptop), so I thought that it is some phone memory related trouble.

Is this why I don't see interwiki links on the main page in ukwiki or dewiki? (Though they are available in frwiki, so I'm not sure.)

The readers need a way to understand whether they are going to a different website, where there is a different content on the same topic, or staying on the same website and open the same content that was translated.

How does this ticket and T332197 correspond with each other?

Так, я про редиректи; з самого домена і субдоменів.
(Забула про існування https://blog.wikimedia.org.ua, якого це не стосується).

Support for ISA in translatewiki.net has been added, @Spinster has already been working of the nl interface.
Can this task be marked as resolved? 🤔

I have just encountered the same error. The lower part of the error description is different for me, as the software versions are newer:

Here is an example of a workaround:
In plwiki there is a list of some three dozen interwiki links on MediaWiki:Watchlist-summary in order to have them on Special:Watchlist.

So. Can we move on and change current wording to the proposed one?

The latest {{PLURAL:$1|version of this page has|versions of these pages have}} been marked for translation.

Reviewable (everything that I can review, currently called unreviewed) & Unreviewed (everything that is completely unreviewed) seems fine to me.

ukwiki is currently under attack of rather persistent vandal(s) who write obscenities on the talk pages of experienced users, including mentors. So we would be very glad to have a way to allow mentees write while block others from writing.

Sorry for leaving the question unanswered. The list looks different depending on the browser one uses, JSON rendering differs in chrome and firefox. It is nothing, really.

Since this project has no one to work on it and Danny is working on global watchlist extension separately, should crosswatch component page at least not say it's Active?

I've had a recent instance of no edit conflict (the first two edits on this history page).

@bd808 I went to the section you linked but saw no applications at all there. So I started from top of the Discord bot setup page and did all steps except the last one. Have I correctly assumed that I had to do this? What should I do next now?

My case was not a common one but let me put it as an example here. In ukwiki there is a traditional template for talk pages of articles translated from another language, with editor ideally putting the id of version the article was translated from. I once had to correct a bunch of incorrectly used version ids. My workflow on desktop looked like this: open the talk page in ukwiki, observe the problematic id → go to the article tab → go to the article history page, look up the creation date → go to article tab → switch languages → go to the history of that page, look up the respective version id → switch languages back → go to the talk page, edit it. (Without the last two steps if using different browser tabs).

Can I help with something at this stage? I have not received other feedback from users since last comment.

I did a translation today and did not see this issue.

A project page about licensing can have different names in different wikis, e.g. the link https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project:Licensing leads nowhere because the correspondent page to Commons:Licensing is called Вікіпедія:Авторські_права in ukwiki. In ukwikisource it has slightly different name, Вікіджерела:Авторське_право. Therefore, while translating the unit, I can neither leave the original "Project:Licensing" nor use a translation that will be common across wikis.

@Ata, you will need to use the bot's invite link to add it to your Discord server.

I confirm.
There wasn't a formal voting on Discord server, but there weren't any objections from server members during a discussion either.

Google was default one before, it would be ok to make it one again.

Users Mr.Rosewater and BogdanShevchenko pointed to these articles:

• Літопс (articlequality) – GA > II > FA > І;
• Комптонівське розсіювання (articlequality) – ІІ > GA > І;
• Квадратний метр (articlequality) – ІІІ > І > ІІ

and are asking whether it is ok for probabilities to go down like this.
User Rar also asked if it is possible to list levels in order, either descending or ascending. Since IV=stub, current order is a bit confusing.

All right! I'm taking this to the village pump for people to see.

I was approached by two users of ukwiki this week about persisting "invalid CSRF token" error.
Could it be that the issue, described in this task, continues to happen?

Yes, ВС = Featured Article, ДС = Good Article.

There are 223 Featured Articles and 739 Good Articles in ukwiki as of today, and not all of them have a project template on a talk page. I cannot say right away whether the numbers you got are exactly true but they do seem plausible. (The lack of article class recognition is a known issue in the wiki.)

Yes, almost all templates starting with Стаття проекту, Стаття проєкту, Вікіпроект, Вікіпроєкт, Проект or Проєкт (spelling differences) are labeling templates.
Of those, that are not, some are used in ns:0, ns:4, ns:14, but not ns:1 (I guess they won't interfere here), and a few are in ns:1 and belong to old Wikipedia Education Program (namely templates Проект:ВікіСтудія, Проект:КНУ, Проект:КПІ, Проект:ЛНМА, Проект:НАУ, Проект:НДУ імені Миколи Гоголя, Проект:Переяслав).

@Chtnnh Do you mean WikiProject template? one example? Here is an assessed article with WikiProject template on its talk page.
Or is it about Infobox template?

As an owner of a newly created bot I am cautious to not do any harm — and thanks from other users would make me sure that I'm on the right track. Also, as a contributor I am often grateful to bot owners for running the tasks, but I have no instant way of thanking them: switching to the owners talk page in order to compose a wikilove message requires time that I might not have at that very moment.

@Halfak As I see in stats, progress is 100%. What's next?

What do the infobox template names look like? … In English Wikipedia, all Infobox templates start with "Infobox". Is it the same in Ukrainian Wikipedia?

No. Initially there was a prefix Картка: for Infoboxes, but it was deprecated in some templates in order to shorten the titles.
I see several ways of identifying the infoboxes (from a user's side):

• Special:PrefixIndex?prefix=Картка:&namespace=10 (minuses: includes /documentation pages, doesn't include templates with no Картка-redirect existing)
• Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Картка&namespace=10&hidelinks=1 + the same for templates Chembox and Taxobox (minuses: doesn't include templates that are not based on these infobox meta-templates; those are supposed to be migrated but not all have been)
• ns=10 pages in Category:Templates:Infoboxes with subcategories (this provides the most complete set of infoboxes, probably)

I see no way of judging if template is an infobox just by it's name, there has to be a comparison with the list of template names believed to be infoboxes.

Does Ukrainian Wikipedia use any "Main article" templates -- e.g. when summarizing a full article in the section of another article?

Yes, there are https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/template:Main and template:Докладніше (the latter used both for main ns and in categories).

@Krinkle do I understand correctly that T222533 suggests a message to be shown to users who try emptying/editing their watchlists, notifying them that it might take a while?
My suggestion is to show something that will prevent users from adding too many pages to their watchlists in the first place, before they face T41510 bug. Let users know about the limitations in place.

If this bug is persistent, can we add a suggestion line "Consider maintaining your watchlist at less than 5k pages" or a warning line "Your watchlist exceeded 5k pages and Edit button might not work" somewhere? I mean, being honest is appreciated.

Yay, thank you all! I'm glad it's officially a known bug/feature =)

My apologies, @Lea_Lacroix_WMDE, do you by chance know whom should I ping so that this task gets triaged? I'd be grateful to know whether it's an issue or it's nothing to worry about :)

This task wasn't resolved in its intended form but there were interviews with Wikipedians who teach:

• Валентина: https://wikimediaukraine.wordpress.com/2017/12/04/oblychcia-wikipedii-3-valentyna-kodola/
• Олег: https://wikimediaukraine.wordpress.com/2019/05/04/wiki-course-polit/

@Trizek-WMF , the privacy statement is very much translated and linked from the English page.

I expect the number to go down later on. Some mentors will be away for some periods of time and some people, I suppose, may later change their minds about being mentors at all.
What I have worries about is that not all the people who signed up to be mentors will actually be good/active mentors. But that is not something I can surely predict or avoid with my knowledge of community.

In T231720#5572816, @Trizek-WMF wrote:

They've decided to review them because of the deployment of the Growth prototypes. Maybe an opportunity to catch? :)

Well, yes, but I would not suggest Growth projects wait until ukwiki is done updating all the help pages. There is no certainty in how long that might take. For now I'm happy to have 5 basic pages and a bunch of mentors.

What Piramidion described looks like one and the same issue for me: he is not able to save his edit because there is no change to save: the content of the unit is already correct (to assume that page history of the translation unit is correct); there is no edit in page history of the translation unit that corresponds to the wrongly shown content, we just 'see' it.

• Piramidion is our backup contact here.
• Thanks to the clarification, I consulted with some users and we didn't come up with other namespaces that should not be monitored (apart from mandatory ones).
• As for the help links, there is a complex situation with help pages in ukwiki -- they are mostly about editing in wikitext mode. I assumed, that it's ok when the first link of the five leads to the page where a newcomer is immediately informed about the two possible editing modes, and then there is a page about VE. Most newcomers I've seen (unreliable source for the generalisation, I know) use VE anyway.

How is a mentor determined as 'away'? By presence of Template:Wikibreak on their page, being inactive for several days, some other sign?

I'm not sure I understand the parts about namespaces. Isn't it decided in the project already which namespaces to cover with help panel etc.? Should there be a community discussion? I used example of T223619 when filling it in here.

@Anomie, thank you for pointing out to the exact problem of that page - as an end editor I find error message a bit too vague.

@Richard_Nevell_WMUK dashboard looks fine to me now. Do you still have troubles?

@Trizek-WMF, I need to get translations done first, it may take some time :|