Ashok Kumar
I reside in London where I'm a Senior Lecturer (tenured associate professor) of Political Economy.
I received my PhD at Oxford University, my MSc at the London School of Economics, and my BA at the University of Wisconsin (Madison).
My previous research includes measuring workers' bargaining power in global value chains as a Leverhulme Early Career Fellow ('15-'18), a study of the Sri Lankan working class funded through the Fulbright Research Fellowship ('08-09) and research on landless peasant movements in Karnataka funded through a Wisconsin Idea Fellowship Grant ('06).
I’ve sat on the editorial board of Environment and Planning D: Society and Space and am currently a member of editorial collectives of the journals Historical Materialism and City. I've taught at a number of universities among them Oxford, Cambridge, and Queen Mary.
My most recent book Monopsony Capitalism: Power and Production in the Twilight of the Sweatshop Age is out with Cambridge University Press won the American Sociological Association's 2021 Paul Sweezy Outstanding Book Prize, was shortlisted for the 2021 BISA-IPEG Book Prize, and won the 2022 Immanuel Wallerstein Memorial Book Award.
The book demonstrates that the production process under global capitalism is governed by a universal logic that shapes the structural bargaining power of workers.
Monopsony Capitalism: www.monopsonycapitalism.com
University: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/our-staff/profile/9159291/ashok-kumar#overview
Twitter: @broseph_stalin
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ashok.kumar6
I received my PhD at Oxford University, my MSc at the London School of Economics, and my BA at the University of Wisconsin (Madison).
My previous research includes measuring workers' bargaining power in global value chains as a Leverhulme Early Career Fellow ('15-'18), a study of the Sri Lankan working class funded through the Fulbright Research Fellowship ('08-09) and research on landless peasant movements in Karnataka funded through a Wisconsin Idea Fellowship Grant ('06).
I’ve sat on the editorial board of Environment and Planning D: Society and Space and am currently a member of editorial collectives of the journals Historical Materialism and City. I've taught at a number of universities among them Oxford, Cambridge, and Queen Mary.
My most recent book Monopsony Capitalism: Power and Production in the Twilight of the Sweatshop Age is out with Cambridge University Press won the American Sociological Association's 2021 Paul Sweezy Outstanding Book Prize, was shortlisted for the 2021 BISA-IPEG Book Prize, and won the 2022 Immanuel Wallerstein Memorial Book Award.
The book demonstrates that the production process under global capitalism is governed by a universal logic that shapes the structural bargaining power of workers.
Monopsony Capitalism: www.monopsonycapitalism.com
University: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/our-staff/profile/9159291/ashok-kumar#overview
Twitter: @broseph_stalin
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ashok.kumar6
less
InterestsView All (41)
Uploads
Books by Ashok Kumar
1. Introduction: ENCLOSURES AND DISCONTENTS: PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION AND RESISTANCE UNDER GLOBALISED CAPITAL
Ashok Kumar, Lisa Tilley and Thomas Cowan
2. THE GOLDEN ‘SALTO MORTALE’ IN THE ERA OF CRISIS: PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION AND LOCAL AND URBAN STRUGGLE IN THE CASE OF SKOURIES GOLD MINING IN GREECE
Charalampos Tsavdaroglou, Konstantinos Petrakos and Vasiliki Makrygianni
3. FARMING THE FRONT LINE: GAZA’S ACTIVIST FARMERS IN THE NO GO ZONES
Ron J. Smith and Martin Isleem
4. LUDDITES IN THE CONGO?: ANALYZING VIOLENT RESPONSES TO THE EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL MINING AMIDST MILITARIZATION
Judith Verweijen
5. THE SMELL OF BLOOD: ACCUMULATION BY DISPOSSESSION, RESISTANCE AND THE LANGUAGE OF POPULIST UPRISING IN SYRIA
Philip Proudfoot
6. PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION IN INDIGENOUS MEXICO: THE CONTESTED TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE MAYA SOLAR OF YUCATÁN
Ana Julia Cabrera Pacheco
academic journals by Ashok Kumar
The papers brought together within this special feature variously interrogate four pro- minent points of contention in Marx’s orig- inal theorisation. The first of these is the temporal assumption invested in primitive accumulation as a set of originary processes occurring to instigate capitalist integration; processes which are therefore understood to be prior to, and separate from, subsequent patterns of accumulation. Vital adjustments of Marx’s work have sought to correct this temporal restriction and bring dispossession within broader theories of accumulation by drawing attention to the repetitive and ongoing enclosures found broadly across the global economy (e.g. De Angelis 2001; Harvey 2004; Kropotkin and Shatz 1995).
edited special issues by Ashok Kumar
1. Introduction: ENCLOSURES AND DISCONTENTS: PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION AND RESISTANCE UNDER GLOBALISED CAPITAL
Ashok Kumar, Lisa Tilley and Thomas Cowan
2. THE GOLDEN ‘SALTO MORTALE’ IN THE ERA OF CRISIS: PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION AND LOCAL AND URBAN STRUGGLE IN THE CASE OF SKOURIES GOLD MINING IN GREECE
Charalampos Tsavdaroglou, Konstantinos Petrakos and Vasiliki Makrygianni
3. FARMING THE FRONT LINE: GAZA’S ACTIVIST FARMERS IN THE NO GO ZONES
Ron J. Smith and Martin Isleem
4. LUDDITES IN THE CONGO?: ANALYZING VIOLENT RESPONSES TO THE EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIAL MINING AMIDST MILITARIZATION
Judith Verweijen
5. THE SMELL OF BLOOD: ACCUMULATION BY DISPOSSESSION, RESISTANCE AND THE LANGUAGE OF POPULIST UPRISING IN SYRIA
Philip Proudfoot
6. PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION IN INDIGENOUS MEXICO: THE CONTESTED TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE MAYA SOLAR OF YUCATÁN
Ana Julia Cabrera Pacheco
The papers brought together within this special feature variously interrogate four pro- minent points of contention in Marx’s orig- inal theorisation. The first of these is the temporal assumption invested in primitive accumulation as a set of originary processes occurring to instigate capitalist integration; processes which are therefore understood to be prior to, and separate from, subsequent patterns of accumulation. Vital adjustments of Marx’s work have sought to correct this temporal restriction and bring dispossession within broader theories of accumulation by drawing attention to the repetitive and ongoing enclosures found broadly across the global economy (e.g. De Angelis 2001; Harvey 2004; Kropotkin and Shatz 1995).
Ashok Kumar (author)
Rob Knox (chair)
Tithi Bhattarcharya
David Harvey
Catarina Principe
Marina Vishmidt
China and India’s economic prowess diverged as recently as the late 1980s, as The Economist (‘Contest of the Century’ 2010) notes ‘as recently as the early 1990s, India was as rich, in terms of national income per head. China then hurtled so far ahead that it seemed India could never catch up.’ That trajectory looks to be changing. In 2012 reports of a continued decline in Chinese manufacturing followed a wave of strikes and riots that began in 2010 (Barboza 2012), and Eli Friedman (2012) commented that ‘by the end of the 2010, Chinese media commentators were declaring that the era of low-wage had come to an end.’ This began a period of capital flight out of China (Kumar and Gawenda 2013). Some have argued that with its growing importance in the global economy the next choicest option after China is India (Frank 1998; Winters and Yusuf 2007) which is expected to outpace China’s ageing labor force within the next two decades (Bloom 2011).
The paper argues that the post-China global economy is undergoing a twilight of what Harvey (2006) calls the ‘spatial fix’ and consequently an emergence of new ‘organisational fixes’ in the garment production process. These changes in the configuration supplier-end capital will be used as a point of entry to analyse the materiality of workers’ struggles in India and China. The research concludes by countering the claim by Gereffi (1999) that labor-intensive garment production is decidedly ‘buyer-driven’. The research finds that specifically specialised production has undergone a concentration of supplier-end capital and, for the first time, the appearance of quasi-monopoly large-scale producers. The effect is greater value-capture at the bottom of the supply chain, opening up the prospect of workers in the sector who have historically remained largely powerless to efficaciously target their direct employers, given the spatial divide between value-capturing transnational brands and value-producing workplaces
The paper is based on comparative research between major shoe-supplier Po Chen and its strike at its Yue Yuen facility in April 2014 and the workers struggle at denim-producing Arvind Mills distribution site in Ramnaragara in the outskirts of Bangalore in 2013. The research is based the experiences as an organiser of the international solidarity campaign with the Yue Yuen strike, interviews with Chinese labor activists, as a translator for the Workers’ Rights Consortium in South India, as well as six months between 2012-2013 as a union organiser in the Bangalore-based Garment And Textile Workers’ Union.
Barboza, David. 2012. “China’s Economy Slows as Exports and New Orders Decline.” The New York Times, August 1, sec. Business Day / Global Business. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/02/business/global/in-china-manufacturing-growth-still-slumps.html.
Bloom, D.E. 2011. “7 Billion and Counting.” Science 333 (6042): 562.
“Contest of the Century.” 2010. The Economist, August.
Frank, A.G. 1998. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Univ of California Pr.
Friedman, Eli. 2012. “China in Revolt.” Jacobin.
Gereffi, G. 1999. “International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain.” Journal of International Economics 48 (1): 37–70.
Harvey, David. 2006. The Limits to Capital. Verso Books.
Kumar, Ashok, and Alex Gawenda. 2013. “Made in Post-China.” Counterpunch, June. http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/14/made-in-post-china/.
The Economist. 2010. “World Economy: The Rising Power of the Chinese Worker”, July 29. http://www.economist.com/node/16693333.
Winters, L.A., and S. Yusuf. 2007. Dancing with Giants: China, India, and the Global Economy. World Bank Publications.
Žižek, S. 1998. “For a Leftist Appropriation of the European Legacy.” Journal of Political Ideologies 3 (1): 63–78.
This paper comes at the end of five months of participant observation with South India’s garment sector trade unions and as an organizer in the international campaign. The research looks at the formation of the International Union League of Adidas Workers, their organizing structure, strategy and tactics. The paper digs deeper into the coalescing of organic demands actualised from disparate conditions and the historical path that led to this organizational reality. Ultimately it aims to answer, at both a theoretical and practical level, the question of how workers can become organised, extracting higher wages and improved conditions from employers/brands, in a global regime of mobile capital.