User talk:B1mbo
Add topicThis page can be found at es:Usuario:B1mbo.
This is an interwiki redirect. |
Talk:Interwiki_map#BCNbio proposed removal
[edit]It was you who requested it, right? --Nemo 17:52, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Wikimedia Travel Guide: Naming poll open
[edit]Hi there,
You are receiving this message because you voiced your opinion at the Request for Comment on the Wikimedia Travel Guide.
The proposed naming poll opened a few days ago and you can vote for as many of the proposed names as you wish, if you are eligible. Please see Travel Guide/Naming Process for full details on voting eligibility and how the final name will be selected. Voting will last for 14 days, and will terminate on 16 October at 06:59:59 UTC.
Thanks, Thehelpfulone 21:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Mi amigo, he hecho una propuesta de temas a abordar con un par de racionales sobre los mismos, y un desglose más detallado del programa. En espera de tus comentarios. Saludos, --ProtoplasmaKid (WM-MX) (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Participation Support Program survey
[edit]Hello, the Wikimedia Foundation would like your feedback on the Participation Support Program! We have created a brief survey to help us better understand your experience participating in the program and how we can improve for the future. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you submitted or commented on Participation Support requests in the past.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback! And we hope to see you in the Participation Support Program again soon.
Happy editing,
Siko and Haitham, Grantmaking, Wikimedia Foundation.
This message was sent via Global message delivery on 21:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
2014 FDC self-nomination
[edit]Hello, Osmar! Thank you very much for submitting your nomination to join the Funds Dissemination Committee. I am working with the Board representatives to the FDC on the FDC nominations process. As you know, the public question and answer period is now underway. Please do review the questions and respond to them as you are able. If you are selected for an interview, kindly note that interviews will be held the week of the 23rd June and the 30th, if necessary. If the Board appoints you to the FDC, we will be holding orientation for members prior to Wikimania on August 6 and 7 in London. If you have any questions at all, don't hesitate to reach out to me on my Talk page or at [email protected]. Once again, thank you very much for putting yourself forward as a candidate for the FDC! KLove (WMF) (talk) 23:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Re: NC or ND licenses, that some people argue are not free
[edit]What? Does someone argue they are free licenses? :-) I think you meant "that some people dislike/would abolish because they are not free", beware the misunderstandings. --Nemo 06:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your correction :). I don't want to dig in the definition of licensing, considering I'm not an expert and is not also the point of the question, but I don't want to be imprecise so I rephrased that. Thanks for reading also! --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 18:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Superprotect status
[edit]Dear B1mbo, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.
- Request for comment: Requests for comment/Superprotect rights
- An open letter about its implementation: Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer
Peteforsyth 09:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
How can we improve Wikimedia grants to support you better?
[edit]Hi! The Wikimedia Foundation would like your input on how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project.
After reading the Reimagining WMF grants idea, we ask you to complete this survey to help us improve the idea and learn more about your experience. When you complete the survey, you can enter to win one of five Wikimedia globe sweatshirts!
In addition to taking the the survey, you are welcome to participate in these ways:
- Respond to questions on the discussion page of the idea.
- Join a small group conversation.
- Learn more about this consultation.
This survey is in English, but feedback on the discussion page is welcome in any language.
With thanks,
I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 01:23, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Last call for WMF grants feedback!
[edit]Hi, this is a reminder that the consultation about Reimagining WMF grants is closing on 8 September (0:00 UTC). We encourage you to complete the survey now, if you haven't yet done so, so that we can include your ideas.
With thanks,
I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery. 19:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Inspire Campaign on content curation & review
[edit]I've recently launched an Inspire Campaign to encourage new ideas focusing on content review and curation in Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia volunteers collaboratively manage vast repositories of knowledge, and we’re looking for your ideas about how to manage that knowledge to make it more meaningful and accessible. We invite you to participate and submit ideas, so please get involved today! The campaign runs until March 28th.
All proposals are welcome - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive feedback on ideas is welcome - your skills and experience can help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign to improve review and curation tasks so that we can make our content more meaningful and accessible! I JethroBT (WMF) 05:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) through MediaWiki message delivery.
Hello there! Please, do assume good faith :) You have not posted your answers to some questions, like:
- Affiliate-selected Board seats/2016/Questions#Grants structure
- Affiliate-selected Board seats/2016/Questions#Meta-chapters
- Affiliate-selected Board seats/2016/Questions#What is the crisis?
- Affiliate-selected Board seats/2016/Questions#Openness of board proceedings
- Affiliate-selected Board seats/2016/Questions#Non-profit experience
- Affiliate-selected Board seats/2016/Questions#Making the WMF a membership organisation
- Affiliate-selected Board seats/2016/Questions#Should there be an independent review / analysis of the recent crises?
The voting starts today, so it is better to have everything done as soon as possible. I do want to hear your opinion on the questions you have missed, and I am going to ask this from every candidate, as it is important to understand how a future Trustee (and technically any of us can be elected) treats this or that issue, to know his or her thoughts about it on a public page. And I think that I am not very unique in my desire to have more text to get to know people better :) Wikipedians tend to read people (literally speaking) --アンタナナ 02:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. I do not have intentions to make you answer the questions you do not want to answer, I just want to know your opinion before you are elected as a Trustee. Even if you think that some questions are out of scope or not relevant. Thank you :) --アンタナナ 02:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Antanana: Hi! As I mentioned here a few days ago, I had some personal issues and I couldn't reply as fast as I wish. Now, I'm catching up with the rest of the answers and I hope to have them all answered this Easter weekend. --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 12:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- oh, I see. I wasn't watching that page, sorry. I hope everything is okay. looking forward to reading your answers then :) --アンタナナ 14:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Antanana: Hi! As I mentioned here a few days ago, I had some personal issues and I couldn't reply as fast as I wish. Now, I'm catching up with the rest of the answers and I hope to have them all answered this Easter weekend. --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 12:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Dear B1mbo, I am chair of Wikimedia Ukraine Board and writing to you on behalf of Wikimedia Ukraine. Is it possible for you to find an hour to talk via Skype (hangouts) during the next few days? Preferably before May 6, as we have to vote before May 7. I have written a letter to you, please check your email.
I apologize for such a short notice, but I thought I would have an opportunity to meet all candidates during Wikimedia Conference 2016. And we were really busy with Wiki Loves Earth contest last week --Ilya (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Through June, we’re organizing an Inspire Campaign to encourage and support new ideas focusing on addressing harassment toward Wikimedia contributors. The 2015 Harassment Survey has shown evidence that harassment in various forms - name calling, threats, discrimination, stalking, and impersonation, among others - is pervasive. Available methods and systems to deal with harassment are also considered to be ineffective. These behaviors are clearly harmful, and in addition, many individuals who experience or witness harassment participate less in Wikimedia projects or stop contributing entirely.
Proposals in any language are welcome during the campaign - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive feedback on ideas is appreciated, and collaboration is encouraged - your skills and experience may help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign so that we can work together to develop ideas around this important and difficult issue. With thanks,
I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC) (Opt-out instructions)
YGM
[edit]Hello, B1mbo. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template. |
—UY Scuti Talk 20:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Good luck!
[edit]Hey Osmar, I'd like to wish you all the best for the upcoming FDC election. It would be a pleasure and honor for me to serve with you. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:39, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks @Frank Schulenburg:! Best wishes for you in this election! --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 02:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
All the best for FDC election!
[edit]Hi Osmar! I see that you running as me for the FDC election. I'll be very happy to work with you on the commettee.--BamLifa (talk) 16:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks @BamLifa:! Good luck for you too! --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 02:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Funds Dissemination Committee
[edit]In Portuguese, you not don't say: "Olá! Eu sou uma Wikimedista experiente desde 2004...". It would be better to change to "Oi! Eu sou um Wikimedista experiente desde 2004...". Boa sorte na sua condidatura no Funds Dissemination Committee. Dr. LooLets talk about it 04:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hey @Luizpuodzius:, thanks for the correction! I didn't do the translation, but I changed it now that you mentioned the mistake! :) --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Neurorebel
[edit]Hello. I have a user named Neurorebel. The user is doing well in Spanish Wikipedia but has trouble communicating and writing in English Wikipedia. I've done my best to help that user. See the following links:
- User talk:Neurorebel#In response
- My talk page at En.wikipedia
- Another talk page
- One village pump subpage
Maybe you can go to one of the pages and help the editor out: User talk:Neurorebel, es:w:User talk:Neurorebel, or en:w:User talk:Neurorebel.
P.S. Congratulations on winning the FDC election. :) --George Ho (talk) 06:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Bridges across Cultures
[edit]Hi B1mbo. Please also translate the Template:Bridges across Cultures signs editnotice/i18n. It will show up when people add their name or articles to the list of Bridges across Cultures/Participants. Many thanks! --
- Hi again! I really wonder how you decided to change the criteria. New rules gives a huge disadvantage to writers of high quality articles. Just creating a new article with a infobox easily pushes it up to 5 kB while adding the extra info to make it 20 kB takes several times extra effort but same points! -- Meisam (talk) 09:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Meisam! This is a particularly difficult issue and I understand your concerns. Lowering the minimum size makes it easier for people to participate, while increasing it ensures you will get better articles but it is more difficult, so we need to find a balance. While I was creating the table of proposed articles, I noticed that 5kB seems a reasonable limit. While adding infoboxes and galleries and lists obviously helps to increase the size of an article easily, it still doesn't cross the threshold so you have to provide more information. For example, this article which has basically just an infobox has less than 2kB. On the other hand this other article is a very decent article, not just with the infobox but also with a lot of text; however, it has just 6kB, so wouldn't have been eligible for the contest. I proposed the change to the organizing committee and they agreed. Once the contest is finished, we will evaluate if the 5kB is reasonable for the contest or maybe we should increase it for the next edition. Thanks for your preocupation and thanks also for all the help in the contest itself! --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 14:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- I understand the reason to grant points to 5kB articles. My main concern is not the threshold itself. I’m more concerned about the increments. Consider these articles:
- article_1 (5.1 kB) - 10 points
- article_2 (10.1 kB) - 10 points
- article_3 (15.1 kB) - 10 points
- article_4 (20.1 kB) - 20 points
- Articles 1-3 will all receive only 10 points while it is >x3 times harder to write article_3 than article_1. And, instead of granting at least x4 points to article_4 it will just receive twice the points of article_1! -- Meisam (talk) 15:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- On a separate topic; this article is more than 6 kB! -- Meisam (talk) 15:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- I understand the reason to grant points to 5kB articles. My main concern is not the threshold itself. I’m more concerned about the increments. Consider these articles:
- @ Meisam i B1mboSobre este mismo tema y la puntuación, he dejado un comentario pregunta en la discusión del proyecto, que esperaba respondieran. Parece que en este concurso no va a ser posible ningún cambio. Yo me esforzado en ver como hacer un artículo con más de 20 Kb en español y le aseguro que me ha costado mucho más que cuatro veces que hacer los de 5 Kb. Es una lástima! Saludos. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by MarisaLR (talk)
- I agree MarisaLR. As I've written here earlier, it is unfair towards the people writing high quality articles. I propose the points to be distributed in the following manner:
- 0-5 kB - 0 points
- 5-10 kB - 5 points
- 10-15 kB - 10 points
- 15-20 kB - 15 points
- 20-25 kB - 20 points
- 25+ kB - 25 points
- It will still favor creation of new articles but does not punish the high-quality article writer as much as now. -- Meisam (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Meisam, this topic was already discussed with the different groups organizing the contest. There were several proposals as you can see in the history of the article, and in fact I proposed a more distributed system, but has different problems. That is why it was decided the current system. The contest is already running so I wouldn't change the system now. As I mentioned, we can evaluate the results at the end of this edition and see if we can change it for next year. --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 17:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- I agree MarisaLR. As I've written here earlier, it is unfair towards the people writing high quality articles. I propose the points to be distributed in the following manner:
- Gracias a ambos por vuestras respuestas, sigo diciendo que es una lástima para los que nos gusta hacer artículos de más calidad. --MarisaLR (talk) 17:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Meisam! This is a particularly difficult issue and I understand your concerns. Lowering the minimum size makes it easier for people to participate, while increasing it ensures you will get better articles but it is more difficult, so we need to find a balance. While I was creating the table of proposed articles, I noticed that 5kB seems a reasonable limit. While adding infoboxes and galleries and lists obviously helps to increase the size of an article easily, it still doesn't cross the threshold so you have to provide more information. For example, this article which has basically just an infobox has less than 2kB. On the other hand this other article is a very decent article, not just with the infobox but also with a lot of text; however, it has just 6kB, so wouldn't have been eligible for the contest. I proposed the change to the organizing committee and they agreed. Once the contest is finished, we will evaluate if the 5kB is reasonable for the contest or maybe we should increase it for the next edition. Thanks for your preocupation and thanks also for all the help in the contest itself! --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 14:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unicode character size problem for contest criteria
[edit]Another problem is that ar,fa characters are saved as 2-Byte unicode characters. As an example when I add one "B" character: in es Wikipedia or in tr Wikipedia is a +1 byte edit while adding one character in Persian Wikipedia is a +2 byte edit! This will definitely screw the evaluation for users contributing to tr.Wikipedia. Because, their contributions will count as half of the contributions of ar.Wikipedia and fa.Wikipedia users which are in the same contest group. -- Meisam (talk) 16:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- As an example, both of these two articles are 6-7 kB: Caracas Simón Bolívar Meydanı (tr) کارلوس مونسیویس (fa) -- Meisam (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi! I get the point. However, it is very difficult to implement a different system that can be just, simple to evaluate and easy to explain. We discussed at the beggining of the contest between the organizers the best way to evaluate and it is very hard to find a system that works for everyone. As I mentioned, this is the first edition of the contest so we will evaluate how the points system works and what can we change for future editions. --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think we can simply count the number of added characters (not the total size of the contribution) for the articles written in Arabic and Persian Wikipedias to be on the same foot as the Turkish Wikipedia. As a rough estimate it will be half of the size. Exact value can be automatically extracted by a bot. -- Meisam (talk) 23:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi! I get the point. However, it is very difficult to implement a different system that can be just, simple to evaluate and easy to explain. We discussed at the beggining of the contest between the organizers the best way to evaluate and it is very hard to find a system that works for everyone. As I mentioned, this is the first edition of the contest so we will evaluate how the points system works and what can we change for future editions. --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Saludos
[edit]Estoy participando en el concurso Puentes entre Culturas y acabo de crear un artículo Museo Baghdadi la versión en español de المتحف البغدادي, ¿cómo puedo hacer para verlo reflejado en la página de artículos sugeridos?, atte, Naturista2018 (talk) 08:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Bridges between cultures
[edit]Hi, what about the winners of "bridges between cultures"? When they are going to be announced? --الرشيد (talk) 08:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @الرشيد:! We've just announced the winners at Bridges across Cultures/Results. Congratulations btw! Can you send me privately your email address, so I can start coordinating your prize? --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 13:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo, I'm trying to contact you since yesterday.--Amr F.Nagy (talk) 21:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
The Affiliate-selected Board seats process welcomes your support
[edit]Hello. You are receiving this message because you are active in the field of translations <3 The movement needs you! The Nominations phase has started for the ongoing selection process of two Board members, and the timeline is quite tight.
A Translation Central is available to help translators figure out what's been covered and what's left to do. Over the course of the next few weeks, your attention on candidates' profiles is particularly welcome.
While there are four languages that are especially relevant for multiple affiliates (namely Arabic, French, Russian and Spanish), you can also add others. If you can't help: please see if you know anyone in your circle who could, and spread the word :) Thank you! Elitre (WMF) and Facilitators of ASBS 2019, 13:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
The Research team could use your help
[edit]Hello. You are receiving this message because of your recent activity in the Translations namespace.
The Wikimedia Research team is developing a new algorithm that automatically recommends sections for editors to add to articles. Translations have already occurred for some of the few languages that we are testing in, except for Spanish and Russian. If you have some time in the next few days, please consider translating the short message (only 6 items) we aim to send out soon, in one or both of these languages. (And if you feel like you want to support your tester peers even more, you can do so by taking care of the related instructions page.)
Thank you! Jonathan Morgan & Diego Saez-Trumper, Wikimedia Foundation Research - 18:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Please translate the Editing newsletter
[edit]Would you please translate VisualEditor/Newsletter/2019/July into your favorite language for me? I'd really appreciate it. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your help
[edit]Hi there, translator! Here's a little token of appreciation for a recent effort you contributed to. Surprised? Well, the best is yet to come.
- We'd love to send you this badge as an actual sticker. If you want, you can use this Google Form to communicate your address so we can ship it to you. Note that we will close the form on October 13, 2019, and all data will be removed shortly afterwards. Details about this external site are provided at the top of the form.
- We also have this badge waiting for you on Wikimedia Space. You can use the form linked above to let us know what your username is on this brand new hub, so that you can get the award there as well. If you don't have an account yet, just go ahead and enjoy joining via Wikimedia login in just a few clicks. (And in case you hadn't heard yet, you can join the community of translators there as well).
Again, thanks for everything you are doing to make this movement a better (and multilingual!) place: please do not hesitate to reach out if you have questions, and I hope to hear from you soon. --Elitre (WMF), 13:03, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
CentralNotice
[edit]Hola. Siento no haberte podido responder en la página del CentralNotice. Llevo unos días ausente por enfermedad y estoy entrando de vez en cuando para ver si hay algo pendiente. Un saludo, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Muchas gracias por la respuesta y la preocupación! Espero que ya estés mejor, un abrazo! --Osmar Valdebenito, B1mbo (talk) 18:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Bridges across Cultures
[edit]When will the results of "Bridges across Cultures" Competition be announced?--MohammadHuzam (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Bridges across Cultures
[edit]Hi B1mbo. I am not sure if you are the organizor of the contest, but, are you planning to organize it in this year too? I come from the Turkish Wikipedia and I am interested in organizing it there.--Nanahuatl (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Días de trabajo «Queering Wikipedia 2021»: 14–16 de mayo
[edit]El grupo de usuarios Wikiproyecto LGBTQ+ está organizando una serie de días de trabajo online. Como miembro del es:Wikiproyecto:LGBT, como wikimedista que edita sobre temáticas LGBTQ+, te invitamos a ayúdanos a definir metas y a desarrollar nuestra organización y estructuras.
Las días de trabajo se desarrollarán en inglés, con interpretación simultánea al español.
Esperamos conocérte en los días de trabajo: 14–16 de mayo, 1400–1730 UTC
Para más información y cómo registrarse, visite al QW2021/es.--El grupo de usuarios Wikiproyecto LGBTQ+ 14:58, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
I need the help of a translationadmin in moving a page
[edit]Dear B1mbo,
How is your day going? I don't mean to take so much of your time. I raised a little issue on Babylon's Talk and would be so lucky to have you help out. Thank you Danidamiobi (talk) 22:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)