Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2017-09

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests | Permissions
Latest comment: 7 years ago by RadiX in topic Removal of access

Administrator access

Latest comment: 7 years ago58 comments25 people in discussion

Ләйсән@ba.wikibooks

Status:    Done

I want to be an administrator Ләйсән (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Ләйсән Please post a local request at ba.wikibooks on their village pump or specific page where voting occurs and let it run for at least one week. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Well, MF-Warburg has made you an administrator until 6 September 2017. In case you want to be an administrator for longer, you need to follow the procedure I noted above. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is underway for a longer term at the link above, and should run through 1 September. I would add that Ләйсән was a responsible test-administrator on the project at Incubator, so has some mop experience. I would recommend six months as an initial term, provided the RfA is successful. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:57, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Done for 6 months. – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

My temporary adminship expires in 8 days and I would like to renew it. No active community has been established yet, so only one user participated in the discussion (and supported me). I am therefore requesting a 5 months renewal --Kostas20142 (talk) 14:37, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Extended for one year, to expire on 2 Sept 2018. I took the liberty of checking through your admin actions, and didn't see any causes for concern, so I'm comfortable granting the rights for a longer period of time. Thanks for your continued help on that project! – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

DARIO [email protected]

Status:    Done

Please Re grant admin right. I have already lot of experience with the sysop tool as being a sysop on three Wikis and also a Global Sysops. Could I have this time the admin right permanently? It will avoid wasting time for all of us. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 07:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

On hold until August 27 to allow the request to be open for at least one week. RadiX∞ 20:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

After a week, the local request has been approved. Pedrohoneto (talk) 23:28, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

 On hold Outcome is being discussed. RadiX∞ 23:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Granted for a year, per our internal discussion. Given the small size of the community, some were still uncomfortable with granting indefinite adminship at this time. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Пугачов Иван Петрович@xalwikipedia

Status:    Done

Dear administrators, I ask you to permanently protect the article Wikipedia:Бичлиһан Bichlihan, an active war of revisions by anonymous authors. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 15:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

You have requested the wrong place at here, those article protection tasks it should make requests at local wiki, your proposal at here would not be prudent. SA 13 Bro (talk) 15:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
But this wiki is not administrators. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 15:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
This wiki lists two administrators: User:Calmouk and User:Huuchin. However, it looks like neither has made an edit nor a log action since 2015. If so, then the page to request this would be SRM, I imagine. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
These two members User:Calmouk and User:Huuchin are no longer administrators. So, as they have not been active for more than two years. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
They are still listed there (see xal:Special:ListUsers/sysop). If the community voted to remove them from that status, or if they should have been removed because the community has an existing inactivity policy, then action was never taken on that, because they are still listed as administrators. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Here is the proof this and this. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 16:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
(This will be my last comment here, as Stewards really need to address)
  • You possibly have an issue that the administrator status of these two users should be terminated. If so, please place a notice to that effect farther down on this page, at #Removal of access.
Note to Stewards concerning the "proof" brought above: Rights were not removed during AAR 2014 due to xal:Special:Diff/71765 and xal:Special:Diff/71841, which were comments by the two local sysops themselves. Not that I speak that language, understand, but I saw no other comments but those two, and there was no link to a different discussion on the wiki. Whether those two comments by the sysops themselves are sufficient for them to continue holding those rights an additional two years later is your call, of course, not mine. But it does seem, at very least, that there are no sysops currently active on that wiki. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Any further comment here will have to come from a steward, which I am not. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks to provide the local wiki situation. SA 13 Bro (talk) 16:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Done, though requests like this should go to SRM. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Samuele2002@itwikiversity

Status:    Done

Please assign permanent adminship as per consensus in the vote and as established by global policies. Thank you --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 06:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold until 5 Sept (or 7 Sept according to the intro text). – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Granted for 2 years. There is still not enough of a local community to warrant permanent adminship, but I'll try to compromise :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks :) --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 17:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Martinligabue@itwikiversity

Status:    Done

Please assign permanent adminship as per consensus in the vote and as established by global policies. Thank you --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 06:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

 On hold till 7 September 2017. Ruslik (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Granted for 2 years. There is still not enough of a local community to warrant permanent adminship, but I'll try to compromise :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks :) --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 17:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

--Alp Er Tunqa (talk) 06:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Indefinite access granted. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:22, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Feipìn@lijwiki

Status:    Done

(I am requesting admin rights for Feipìn for a full year. He was already administrator once back to 2008, when he was active as F. Noceti. He did a brilliant job at the time as he is also knowledgeable of IT skills. We met lately and he decided to support my admin activity. We are very few people on Wikipedia Ligure, unfortunately, while most active users voted for him on https://lij.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators/candid%C3%A6 ) Luensu1959 (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

They will need to start a request on the local community discussion page, and after a week (even of no comment) we can grant access. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

We already did it by posting on the "Pòrtego da comûnitæ" last August 24. The first item on our Ligurian community discussion page is titled "Eleççioin à amministratô". The first paragraph was posted by our leading admin called Giromin Cangiaxo, the second by me (Luensu1959) at a later date, and the third was posted by Feipìn(discuscioin) 06:21, 24 Ago 2017 (UTC). Correspondingly, users/members voted on the page indicated above. Luensu1959 (talk) 08:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

It was just a wrong link: you should use discussion=:lij:Wikipedia:Administrators/candidæ instead of pointing to an usertalk. While I see some votes from people with a few local activity I think there's a fair consensus in renewing/assigning these 1-year adminships. --Vituzzu (talk) 09:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

User:Gnangbade who is main contributor of recently opened kabye wikipedia expressed wish to became a sysop. I saw it, support and placed request here as User:Gnangbade probably do not know all the bureaucracy how to get sysop status. Hugo.arg (talk) 14:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Gnangbade was an active and responsible test-admin when this project was in Incubator. Gnangbade can be started out with six months if RfA is approved locally. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
On hold until 10 Sept. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Done for 3 months. – Ajraddatz (talk) 02:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

The user received 11 votes and was elected as sysop. Please grant him the sysop flag per the local policy and consensus. Thank you. Regards, J.Wong 03:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Done. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Koenraad@dewiki

Status:    Not done

Dschungelfan (talk) 08:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Local bureaucrats take care of this. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Пугачов Иван Петрович@xal.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

I ask to give administrator rights in Kalmyk Wikipedia. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 20:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

@Пугачов Иван Петрович: Please start a local discussion on the Village pump or some central location in your wiki and link it here. We can grant the permission after a week based on the discussion--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
@Shanmugamp7: And I have already made a request, here. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 07:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 On hold till 15 September --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 09:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm in no position to comment at the local wiki. But I will point out that there are indefs on this user at four wikis under two different user names (User:Пугачов Иван Петрович and User:Пугачов Иван). That is, of course, not an automatic reason to decline this request, but I assume the stewards would wish to be aware of the situation. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done User has been indef blocked on more than three wikis and the contributions to xal wiki are not so convincing. As there is no active community at xal wiki to review the contributions, i am declining this request.--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
He seems to be banned from mhrwiki for changing some Ukraine related disputs and Georgia/Abkhasia situation related edits (he seems to change pro-Russian violation of NPOV to anti-Russian). I am not sure what exactly was in srwiki, but it seems that something related to Crimea, Transnistria, Kosovo disputes. Again he changes one NPOV violations to the opposite ones. In ruwiki he is blocked for being a sock of banned user:Пугачов Иван. The latter account banned for edit warring and destructive demeanour but viewing random edits does not show anything really bad. The latter acc also banned in vepwiki for as I can see also Georgia/Abkhasia related warring. Please note that in none of the wikis mentioned I have the permissions to see deleted contributions so I may get not the whole picture. But basing on what I see I do not think that bans before first 50 edits for edit wars where both sides are wrong (as neither tried to go for NPOV) is something which has to do with admin rights. For what it is worth he can influence territorial disputes related articles without admin privileges now. If it were up to me I would risk giving a temporary adminship for a short term and see how it goes. In case he uses his rights in a damaging way it always can be reverted. --Base (talk) 14:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Jnanaranjan [email protected]

Status:    Done

I would like to be an administrator at Odia Wikipedia.--Jnanaranjan sahu (talk) 05:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 23 September. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 06:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Hi, please become a administrator, thank you. Nickelodeon9293 (talk) 14:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done. Now without any edits on the wiki in question. Edit the wiki, place your request locally and then come back with a new request. -- Tegel (Talk) 14:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
This user is also indefinitely blocked on es.wikipedia due to abusing multiple accounts and vandalism. SA 13 Bro (talk) 14:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

CheckUser access

Latest comment: 7 years ago13 comments7 people in discussion

Lanwi1@zhwiki

Status:    Done

The user was elected to be checkuser. He signed the confidentiality agreement already. Please grant him the checkuser flag. Thank you. J.Wong 16:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Granted. @Trijnstel: Would you please give him access to both checkuserwiki and checkuser-l? RadiX∞ 04:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Doing... @Lanwi1: please take a look at the email I just send and reply. Thanks. Trijnsteltalk 13:04, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
And.... Done. Trijnsteltalk 14:25, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

0x010C@frwikipedia

Status:    Done

Please give the statut after French arbcom decision. Thanks, cordially, --Ruyblas13 (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2017 (UTC).

Done. @Trijnstel: for other access please :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Doing.... @0x010C: please take a look at the email I just send & reply. Tnx. Trijnsteltalk 18:02, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: I've just replied to your mail — 0x010C ~talk~ 21:00, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! And all Done now. Trijnsteltalk 21:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Hej Stewards, would you please grant me local CheckUser access on de:wikipedia as approved per community vote/consensus recently (95% consensus (193/10) in a 2 week pro/con voting).
I've provided identification to the Wikimedia Foundation in 2011 and signed the confidentiality agreement under the access to non public information policy in 2015. Thanks in advance - and best regards Rax (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

@Rax: I've send you an email. Please take a look at it & reply. Tnx. Trijnsteltalk 22:40, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: I just replied. --Rax (talk) 22:51, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Done. Trijnsteltalk 21:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Oversight access

Removal of access

Latest comment: 7 years ago98 comments32 people in discussion

Courcelles@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

This user has not made the required 5 admin actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 03:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Removed, with many thanks for his work. RadiX∞ 03:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Pyb@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

This user has not made the required 5 admin actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 03:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Removed, with many thanks for their work. RadiX∞ 03:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Please remove my Administrator rights. Jairodz (talk) 08:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. RadiX∞ 14:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Done, thanks for your work. Stryn (talk) 08:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I'm not very active there these days, so it doesn't make sense for me to have the administrator tools at this time. Thanks! GorillaWarfare (talk) 15:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. RadiX∞ 16:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Done. Thank you for your work. RadiX∞ 19:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Pompidom@nlwikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove my admin rights at nl.wikipedia. Pompidom (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. RadiX∞ 19:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Done, thanks for your work. Stryn (talk) 13:55, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Inactive checkusers and oversights@testwiki and test2wiki

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Per CheckUser policy and Oversight, please remove these users' CheckUser and Oversight flag.--GZWDer (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Test projects are special. Checkuser and oversight access on them may be necessary for testing. Have you notified these users? Ruslik (talk) 17:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
@Ruslik0 and GZWDer: I have asked James to check out this case from the WMF standpoint. The rights were assigned so long ago by former WMF staff so maybe they are no longer required. AFAIK at least three of them are no longer with WMF. RadiX∞ 19:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
There is nothing special about testwikis in this case. As those wikis are connected to SUL there are the same personal information about users editing there as on the other Wikimedia projects. I do not know about any exceptions to CU and OS Policies for testwikis. --Base (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 20:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Brion VIBBER@testwiki

Status:    Done

As one project must not have only one CheckUser, please remove this user's CheckUser flag.--GZWDer (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Пугачов Иван Петрович@xalwikipedia

Status:    Not done

Dear administrators, please remove article Өөрд Oord. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

This page is for granting or removing userrights permissions on Wikimedia projects. Please use Steward requests/Miscellaneous for the kind of requests you are doing. --Base (talk) 16:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
And then tell me please, how can I become administrator of the Kalmyk Wikipedia? Where should I go? How to apply? Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 08:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
You need to open a discussion on that wiki, either on a "Request for adminship" page, if it exists, or on the Community Portal page, and see if members of the community will support you. That discussion needs to stay open for at least one full week. If the community supports you, you then come back to this page (above, at #Administrator access and ask the stewards to grant the right, including a link to the discussion on your home wiki. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
You may also need to explain your block history to the stewards in order to have those rights granted. A block history does not necessarily prevent you from getting rights in the future, but it does raise a concern that probably will need to be addressed. IMPORTANT: Don't start arguing that point here and now; this is not the place for it. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Malafaya@vowiki

Status:    Done

Please remove by bureaucrat access. I'm only keeping admininstrator status. Thanks, Malafaya (talk) 19:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Done. Stryn (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Prométhée@frwiki

Status:    Done

The French Arbcom has not renewed Prométhée as a CU after this decision. For the French Arbcom, cordially --Ruyblas13 (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC).

Done. @Trijnstel: for the other access please :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Done, tnx. Trijnsteltalk 18:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

PhiLiP@zhwiki

Status:    Done

I'd like to resign from my current position as a bureaucrat in protest of the recent unblocking decision of 守望者爱孟 and the continuous and massive cyberbullying over certain victims since ~2014 - for example, AddisWang, 乌拉跨氪 and Zhxy519 - from him and his supporters. PhiLiP (talk) 16:54, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day per standard practice. RadiX∞ 20:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Done - I've removed your bureaucrat access. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
@Ajraddatz: Thanks. But please remove the admin access too. --PhiLiP (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Done! Thanks for your work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Calmouk@xalwiki

Status:    Not done

Please remove by admininstrator and bureaucrat access. Inactive for more than two years. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Since there seems to be no local policy, this will be done as part of AAR process--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Huuchin@xalwiki

Status:    Not done

Please remove by admininstrator access. Inactive for more than two years. Пугачов Иван Петрович (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Since there seems to be no local policy, this will be done as part of AAR process--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of administrator access due to lack of administrative actions during a 1 year period (in the period from 2016-09-07 to 2017-09-11). Openbk (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. I also read the discussion, and I appreciate the community taking the time to confirm the case given the ambiguity. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I haven't really been active much recently and can return my administrator rights. Firefox13 (talk) 04:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:53, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Done, with thanks for your past work! – Ajraddatz (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Edmenb@metawiki

Status:    Done

Sadely, Edmenb has no actions like a global renamer in a year, then I request for removing his GR flag. I wish he will come back soon. Regards, Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 07:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC).

Done, with thanks for their work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I am not active for quite a long time, please, remove my bureaucrat and sysop rights from ru.wiki rubin16 (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

@Rubin16: I can remove your bureaucrat permissions per this request, but on ruwiki bureaucrats can remove 'sysop' locally so you'll have either to remove the sysop bit yourself and then note it here so we can flip the bureaucrat bit off, or I can remove the bureaucrat flag now and then ask locally on ruwiki for the sysop bit to be removed from your account. Or you can return to activity and we can forget about this request :) Please let me know. Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I removed my sysop rights on ru.wiki rubin16 (talk) 11:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Done. Bureaucrat rights removed here. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: It seems to me that this very narrow exception (a bureaucrat has asked for all his rights to be removed) ought to be an exception to the rule, such that the stewards can act directly. This is just unnecessary, er, bureaucracy. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
@StevenJ81: I'm just following policy. They decided to have extra bureaucracy when they asked and were granted the ability to remove sysop bits locally, so this was what had to be expected. We've defered back to local wikis other users in the same situation. I'd support however making an exception on the stewards' policy for cases like this, so we're all covered by policy and not from personal interpretations. I'm all for it, and in fact we can go ahead and remove the whole SP#Check_local_policies as steward duties ought only to be regulated on Meta for uniformity. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Well, there is an important local policy to remember, WP:IAR. I think it justifies well reasoned deviations from following policies to the letter well enough. --Base (talk) 12:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
I apply the principle "In dubio pro bureaucracy". You're less likely to mess things. :) —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Gfsas@frwikinews

Status:    Done

Please remove my admin and bureaucrat access, because now, I don't contribute enough for effectively carry out these tasks . - Gfsas (talk) 11:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
@Gfsas: Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Savh@global

Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Please remove my steward access, including access to the mailing lists, OTRS and wikis (both CU & stewards, I do not have CheckUser access elsewhere), and my administrator access on meta. It has been a pleasure to perform these tasks for the past few years, but I currently don't have the time to keep up to date. Savhñ 23:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Don't enjoy doing it, but per your request Done. Thanks for everything and I hope you will stay active on Wikipedia. So long! Trijnsteltalk 23:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Angry / sad reacts only. >:( – Ajraddatz (talk) 23:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
By far the saddest news of the day. :( RadiX∞ 02:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Indeed. 🔫🔫🔫. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
By the way didn't the standard on hold procedure apply? --Base (talk) 03:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
It typically doesn't apply to rights beyond sysop (although I know some stewards do enforce the hold there too) since generally they're trusted enough to understand the dangers of a ragequit. Especially with CU/OS there may be legal reasons they are resigning, or they may not trust themselves enough to not violate someone's privacy and waiting might not be such a great idea. Of course, none of those are the case here. --Rschen7754 04:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Besides: Savh told me a while ago that he wanted to quit and now asked me specifically to action it as soon as it was posted. So that's why I didn't wait. Trijnsteltalk 09:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Not done

Please remove the temporary admin-rights of User:Ymnes due to gross misuse of powers. This user blocked me while we had a conflict. Ymnes did not agree with my critical stance about the Dutch Wikinews and removed normal discussion content here with a reference to my critical stance: (in translation) procedural: "Processed requests will be removed by default on this page." Furthermore, I no longer want to look at that quarreling Banner that wanted to break the project on Meta. Then he came with a warning reading (in translation): (...) I therefore like to block and quickly. You have been warned, because this project is intended for people who want to build it. There is no doubt about that.. And indeed, he blocked me [1]. In a discussion later he stated that he is willing to block me permanently when I keep being critical, on Wikinews or elsewhere on Wikipedia. The Banner (talk) 01:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Local drama
Wrong explanation. You reverted my clean up of a page according to local regulation. After I undid that and gave you a warning with explanation on your talk page, you reverted me again. You were warned, now you are blocked. In fact you're now exporting a wiki coflict to this project, and to Meta and nl.wikipedia before. @Administrator - Note that The Banner is not a contributor to nl.wikinews[2], he is in fact a threat to the project and has continuously attacked the project, yet when it had to be relaunched from the incubator. Ymnes (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
I'd like to make this story a little more complete for those who read this along. The discussion referred to hereabove by both Ymnes and The Banner was about a page on Wikinews-nl which had been nominated for deletion, first by me and then by The Banner. In my opinion, the nomination procedure should have lasted a little longer, so I do not fully agree with the deletion of the discussion by Ymnes yesterday (see here). Nevertheless, I have meanwhile accepted that the other steady contributors to Wikinews-nl prefer to keep the nominated page in the main space. In summary, I'm not completely happy with Ymnes' way of working here, but I think it would be a bridge too far to desysop him as he has also made many good contributions to the project during the last months. De Wikischim (talk) 09:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
It has been fully according to the procedures and that is what counts. People disagree regularly, so that is not a big deal. The Banner - who isn't a contributor of Wikinews - just entered the project to revert an administrator decision and making an edit war of it. Now afterwards, he is attacking me on Wikipedia, and on two places on Meta. He has block records on 4 projects, which are considerable on en.wikipedia and nl.wikipedia. In the past he has been found guilty of suck puppetry, and making public the personal name of a Wikipedia user. He has been subject to a number of arbcom disputes. Since the beginning of this year he has made it his objective to prevent the relauch of nl.wikinews and is campaigning against it since it has been reopened. A global lock on his account would be most appropriate. Ymnes (talk) 09:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The request of Ymness for a global lock is the typical example why he is complete incompetent as an administrator, as he lets his own grudges prevail over WikipediaWikimedia. The Banner (talk) 17:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
In the basis this is not about Wikipedia, but about Wikinews. Actually, Wikipedia has nothing to do with this issue. I do not agree that Ymnes is fully incompetent as an administrator, notwithstanding the fact that I'm somewhat critical too to his way of working in this specific case (see above). De Wikischim (talk) 17:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have stated Wikimedia. But with his request, Ymnes shows that it is he who is a threat to Wikimedia. The Banner (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
That ("a threat to Wikimedia") is highly exaggerated. Not every user who blocks a little too fast is immediately a threat. De Wikischim (talk) 17:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
He is by now changing the of the game to back up his actions. Consensus, anyone? Please note that Ymnes with this rule change the possibility opens to block someone on Wikinews when he is critical about Wikinews on other projects. So my request to dispose him as an administrator on Meta-Wiki can be used for further blocks on Wikinews. The Banner (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
If you were a contributor to nl.Wikinews and would have helped to build the project - you're not such a person - than you wouldn't have had to fear anything. So why are you so afraid? The project is growing, we have new volunteers and this young project is doing very greatly, especially for a 'wikinews' project and for being such a small language as Dutch is. But we don't want to loose what we are building. In fact you were a real threat to the project before it reopened and since about yesterday you start to attack it directly at the project. We know your block records, arbcom records and your fury. @Steward, read this please (April 8) where The Banner is blocked because of his "battleground mentality". The Banner is not a Wikinews contributor. So let's skip this whole thing. In view of his track record, a global lock of his account is the best thing a to do. Ymnes (talk) 18:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
How many times are you going to repeat that I have been a bad boy in the past? Every time you want to get rid of criticism? And again you are now importing things from other projects that have no relevance for Wikinews but that you use as an excuse to defame me. Conduct not fitting for an administrator. Nowhere. The Banner (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
I have not seen a new born Banner. Here, elsewhere on Meta, on Wikinews, and Wikipedia, in just a weekend, I have seen a defaming one that attacks. "Battleground mentality" indeed, no change at all. Ymnes (talk) 19:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
And the only thing I still see is an incompetent administrator abusing his rights to silence other opinions. The Banner (talk) 19:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
I'm not your beggar. We are building a project and the progress is great. It's not your thing, you never wanted it, so why the fuzz. Ymnes (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
So when I start making contributions, you just use your own grudges and administrator rights to lock me out... The Banner (talk) 19:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Oh my God, what a lie! To recapture: 1) there was a decision made and archived, 2) you reverted that, 3) I undid that and warned you on your talk page, inclusive of mentioning that avoiding my warning would have consequences, 4) you reverted me, 5) I blocked you and brought the discussion back into the archive. Ymnes (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Your own words: Verder wil ik niet langer tegen die ruziezoekende Banner aankijken die het project kapot wilde maken op Meta The Banner (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
It says that I don't want that fight seeking user The Banner that searches to bring down the project. So I am a good administrator that protects nl.wikinews from you. Ymnes (talk) 21:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
And with that, you have provided the stewards enough evidence why your administrator rights should be revoked. Bye. The Banner (talk) 21:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Bye, please globally lock this threat to the Community. Ymnes (talk) 21:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Oppose There was no talk about this on the local wiki, and the applicant is not working on Wikinews. Livenws (talk) 12:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
I have not many edits yet but I tried to be useful: my edits. The Banner (talk) 17:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Not done. Please handle this locally, an emergency removal is not needed for now. Matiia (talk) 16:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

H-stt@dewiki

Status:    Done

Not re-elected.-- Dschungelfan (talk) 21:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:50, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Cirdan@dewiki

Status:    Done

Cirdan didn't start a re-election of his checkuser status (re-election modus and timeline, his explanation). Please remove both his checkuser and admin status. Cirdan is not an elected admin, he became the admin bit just for his checkuser job. NNW (talk) 08:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Done. @Trijnstel: Would you please remove his e-mail from the cu mailing-list? His checkuserwiki account is already blocked. Thanks, RadiX∞ 14:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Also Done. Trijnsteltalk 20:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Jimmy Xu@meta

Status:    Done

Jimmy Xu has no actions like a global renamer in a year, then I request for removing his GR flag. Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 03:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Removed. RadiX∞ 03:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Alison, Beria, M0tty, Sandstein, Siebrand @ Wikimedia Commons

Due to our inactivity policy (criterion #2), I hereby request the removal of administrator rights from the five aforementioned users. They have all been listed in the current inactivity run and failed to indicate their willingness to retain their Commons adminship. Thank you! odder (talk) 10:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Done, with many thanks for their past work. RadiX∞ 12:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Latest comment: 7 years ago143 comments40 people in discussion

User nomden@xhwikipedia

Status:    Done

I was an administrator before https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Permissions/2015-09#Nomden.40xh.wikipediaNomden (talk) 06:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-08-28. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Savhñ 15:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:28, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Lee@siwikibooks

Status:    Done

This is a very small community. Currently they don't have an admin. I started a vote but got no result. Since I am a native speaker of Sinhala and also an admin on the Sinhala Wikipedia I would be able to deal better with admin issues that require knowledge on Sinhala. Please grant me temporary admin rights on this project for three (3) months. Lee (talk) 11:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-08-28. Savhñ 15:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Done for six months based on your experience as an admin on si.wiki. Please let us know if you'd like the timeframe reduced nonetheless. Savhñ 15:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Samuele2002@chrwiktionary

Status:    Done

After a week no one objected to my request for administrator flag assignment on chr.wiktionary. Could you give me the temporary flag for six months? Thank you. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

I think 3 months are enough for the first time on a wiki with no other users. Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-08-29. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 14:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 17:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Martinligabue@itWikiversity

Status:    Done

The community of it.Wikiversity requests for Martinligabue a temporary flag for 1 year. Hippias (talk) 16:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-09-02. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Samuele2002@itWikiversity

Status:    Done

The community of it.Wikiversity requests a temporary flag for 1 year for Samuele2002 too. Hippias (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-09-02. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Samuele2002@iawiktionary

Status:    Done

After a two week no one objected to my request for administrator flag assignment on ia.wiktionary. Thank you. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 14:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-09-03. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 12:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

The RFA was closed as successful. Please grant him the admin flag temporarily for 2 months. Thank you.J.Wong 10:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Done till 3.09.2017 10:22masti <talk> 10:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
@Masti: please add another template here, or this won't be archived to SR/AT. Stryn (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 2 months to expire on 2017-09-03. masti <talk> 16:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

مصعب@arwiktionary

Status:    Done

I request the adminship. And l thank meno for his help and explanation---مصعب (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC) I would like to request temporary adminship for مصعب (Romanized: Mosaab, old username: 1339861mzb) for one year on Arabic Wiktionary. He was a temporary admin on that project for one year before but his term expired. See the linked discussion on Arabic Wiktionary Village Pump. (The only 2 users participating supported the nomination. The nomination was open for 10 days.) Mosaab is an experienced editor with more than 100k edits on Wikimedia projects. He is also an admin on Arabic Wikipedia. Meno25 (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

مصعب has not edited on the project at all for 3 months and not accepted the RfA it seems. --Stryn (talk) 14:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
You are right on this. Because of real life circumstances (He lives in a small town with no stable Internet access, so, virtually all of his edits are using his mobile.), he didn't have much time to edit, so, he preferred to edit on Wikipedia (check his recent edits on Wikipedia) rather than Wiktionary, since he was desysoped there. However, about 2 weeks ago, he contacted me and asked me to start a nomination to renew his adminship on Wiktionary as he said that he wanted to be active again there. Mosaab has made over 2000 edits on Wiktionary, which is extraordinary, given the fact that he uses his mobile only to edit and the small size of Arabic Wiktionary. And I have contacted him (both on wiki and privately) and asked him to confirm that he accepts the nomination on wiki and to return to editing on Arabic Wiktionary. However, last time we talked, he told me that his Internet access would be intermittent in the next few days, so, he may not be able to respond quickly. Could you, please, leave this request open for a few more days? --Meno25 (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Sure, we can keep this on hold. --Stryn (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Assuming that this edit shows acceptance, I think we're fine. -- Avi (talk) 00:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-09-04. Discussion open sufficient length of time with no significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 00:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

User Óli Gneisti@wikisource

Status:    Done

There is little or no life on the Icelandic WikiSource and no admins. I have been trying to get answers but no one seems to know anything. I have run a site using the distributed proofreaders proofreading system for public domain Icelandic books but we had to shut it down for a while and we would like to use is.wikisource rather than rebuilding the DP system. is.wikisource needs an admin and no one else seems to be available. I have been a user on various wiki projects since 2005. Óli Gneisti (talk) 19:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-09-05. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. Hopefully I can make the project come alive. --Óli Gneisti (talk) 19:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

--Alp Er Tunqa (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

What was the reason of the edit war on the request page? Ruslik (talk) 09:40, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

this user just created for vandalism and all of his edits are rv or page empety.--Alp Er Tunqa (talk) 11:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

?--Alp Er Tunqa (talk) 09:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-09-06. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Samuele2002@iawikibooks

Status:    Done

After a two week no one objected to my request for administrator flag assignment on ia.wikibooks. Thank you. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 17:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-09-06. --MF-W 18:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Gaurav [email protected]

Status:    Done

(I am editing Punjabi Wikipedia for last three years. I have done my work with full passion and honesty. Punjabi Wikipedia currently needs more administrators to maintain the day by day increasing articles and to keep a look on quality of previous articles.) Gaurav Jhammat (talk) 18:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-09-08. Would the users with the other two requests open like to be sysopped as well? -- Ajraddatz (talk) 23:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

SNN95@mswiktionary

Status:    Done

I like to proposed myself again for temporal admin for mswikt. After a long break because of college, now I have time to continue the legacy of this wiktionary. I hope you all can accept my request. SNN95 (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

You have to start the discussion on the ms.wiktionary, not here. Stryn (talk) 20:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
@Stryn: If I make another proposal there, can I just change the content in discussion parameter in {{sr-request}} or I need to make a new request section? SNN95 (talk) 23:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Just link it here. --MF-W 00:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Here it is ms:wikt:Wiktionary:Penyelia/Pengundian/SNN95_untuk_penyelia_28_Februari_2017 SNN95 (talk) 01:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
On hold until the 7th of March. Please note that votes from users that are not members of the community do not have any value. Savhñ 15:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-08. Savhñ 11:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Kostas20142@elwikiquote

Status:    Done

This wiki has no active administrators or bureaucrats. Since I have gained counter-vandalism experience in en.Wikipedia and I am willing to be active in this wiki (I am on vacation this period, that is why I was relatively inactive in all Wikimedia projects), I am requesting temporary administrative access. I tried to seek community approval, but due to the fact that there isn't currently an active contributors community, there was only one vote( and this one was "support"). So I am requesting the access for 3 months only. During this period, I will seek confirmation and extension(unless directed to do otherwise by the stewards) Kostas20142 (talk) 12:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-09-09. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Extended —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Param [email protected]

Status:    Done

please grant me admin rights Param munde (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-10. --Melos (talk) 12:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Sony [email protected]

Status:    Done

I'm one of the active Wikipedians on Punjabi Wikipedia. Now i have Autopatroller and Patroller rights. So i want to became an admin. If i'm eligible for this, then give me an admin rights. - Thank you Sony dandiwal (talk) 11:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-10. --Melos (talk) 12:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Hippias@itWikiversity

Status:    Done

I've been confirmed as sysop on it.Wikiversity. Can this flag last one year? --Hippias (talk) 07:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-09-11. -- Stryn (talk) 08:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Kulmalukko@fiwikivoyage

Status:    Done

Please extend her rights per discussion. Stryn (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-11. --Melos (talk) 11:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

User [email protected]

Status:    Done

--AminSanaei (talk) 06:35, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

What rights you are asking for? Stryn (talk) 12:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Stryn, for administration access.--AminSanaei (talk) 04:29, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Then moved to the correct section and Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-09-11. -- Stryn (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

[email protected]

Status:    Done

I'm a native speaker of Zazaki and would like to have my adminship extended. Thank you! -- Mirzali (talk) 11:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

 On hold until the 12th of March. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-12. -- Stryn (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Илья Драконов@abwiki

Status:    Done

I would like to continue working as an admin. I am already working for more than 1 year and would like to have a permanent admin flag now. Cheers, Ilya Drakonov (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC).

Looks like it was opened on the 4th. There should be two more days of voting. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Ok. I close the request here for now then. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 16:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC).
Please re-open the local discussion so that it runs 7 days. As of now, it has only run 5. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 19:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Re-opened the local discussion, struck ineligible votes according to the local voting criteria and unstruck an eligible vote that had been struck. Savhñ 00:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Cheers. The vote against me says that my Abkhaz skills are not good, but the criteria of administrating does not say that I must idealy know the language. I was an admin there for more than a year and was doing my job good. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC).
Not exactly. I stated that a permanent administrator must understand the language (well, I used a translator as I don't speak Abkhaz either). The fact that the entire voting page is in a mixture of English and Russian without a single word (bar some elements of interface) in Abkhaz makes me think that the community is not big enough to have a permanent admin. It might be OK to have a short-term temporary adminship when one doesn't speak the language at all until there is a better candidate but definitely not a permament one — NickK (talk) 20:11, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-11. Based on the reduced size of the community, we would not grant permanent adminship, and there seems to be consensus for approving adminship, since it will be granted temporarily. The local criteria may not require the proper language knowledge, but that may nonetheless be a concern for the users participating in the request. Savhñ 21:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Ok. Cheers. Ilya Drakonov (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC).
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Huỳnh Nhân-thập@viwikibooks

Status:    Done

Scroll down and you'll see that the request has started today. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

{{on hold}} till March 14. Stryn (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-14. Discussion open sufficient length of time without significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 00:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

AlbertEinstein05@viwikibooks

Status:    Done

Scroll down and you'll see that the request has started today Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

{{on hold}} till March 14. Stryn (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-14. Discussion open sufficient length of time without significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

RingtailedFox@global

Status:    Done

Granted GIPBE for one week to bypass a rangeblock, should be removed after that. – Ajraddatz (talk) 03:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

AlvaroMolina@tawikinews

Status:    Done

Hi, I request temporary administrator in this wiki with the objective of doing maintenance and cleaning in the project. The local request was open for one week without objections. Thanks. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 12:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-09-16. Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Satdeep Gill@pawikisource

Status:    Done

It's a new project with no admin at all. I am already a permanent admin on pa.wikipedia Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-09-17. Linedwell [talk] 08:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

DARIO SEVERI@ptwikinews

Status:    Done

This wiki has only one active sysop [3]. I am already sysop on Wikivoyage (pt) and Wikipedia (pt) in which besides the normal editions as editor I have another 16,500 administrative editions as Sysop. There is no against votes and 2 support votes, one of them is the actual sysop, the other one is a sysop and bureaucrat in the Spanish wikinews. Permanent adminship is hereby kindly requested. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 11:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Under these circumstances only temporal adminship for 3-6 months is possible. Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
It is OK, please 6 months but 1 year will be better to avoid come here often. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 09:50, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-18. Ruslik (talk) 17:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Extended —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Atcovi@viwikibooks

Status:    Done

Requesting sysopship Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-22. Discussion open sufficient length of time with no significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Why don't you remove the temporary admin rights and then immediately assign them again as other stewards are doing? Stryn (talk) 17:24, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
I think that's unnecessary, unless the idea is to have a log of the most recent discussion? Otherwise, what's the point? -- Avi (talk) 19:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Joined the "cool kids" and double flipped :). -- Avi (talk) 19:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
We should do this, because the temporary user rights feature is not live yet. Also, if you are not aware of Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary... Stryn (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Vito Genovese@trwikibooks

Status:    Done

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-20. -- Stryn (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Removed —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Tarawneh@arwikinews

Status:    Done

The request since 1 March. Thanks--Alaa :)..! 19:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Is this request for temporary one permanent ? please read my comments below Mardetanha talk 22:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
@Mardetanha: As I saw he not mention that in his request, but in wikinews community we prefer permanent -if can- because there is no administrators there! Thanks--Alaa :)..! 22:41, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Again as I said before we can not grant permanent access for small projects Mardetanha talk 08:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Mardetanha: okay for 6 month please, because User:Tarawneh wanna to work in subproject to develop arwikinews. Thanks--Alaa :)..! 15:14, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
What is the purpose of asking such unhelpful questions instead of acting on the request? --MF-W 23:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-21. --MF-W 23:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

removed Stryn (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

AlvaroMolina@ptwikinews

Status:    Done

I request temporary administrator for 6 months or more. The election has already concluded, and has 2 support votes unanimous. Thanks. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 23:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-23. Discussion open sufficient length of time with no significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.. MBisanz talk 12:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
extended Stryn (talk) 18:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

逆襲的天邪鬼@zh-classical.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I request administrator access for 6 months or more. The election has been held for a month. There are 8 supports and no objection. Thanks. --Gyakusyuu no Amanojaku (talk) 05:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2017-09-24. --MF-W 07:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
removed Stryn (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Benoit Rochon@atjwiki

Status:    Done

I granted this user adminship for 2 weeks on this newly created wiki. He already was a "test-admin" on Incubator for this project and closely involved in the creation of the wiki. This is for doing the maintenance (deletion of now superfluous pages) that inevitably has to happen on a new wiki without delay. --MF-W 00:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Granted to expire on 2017-06-30. --MF-W 00:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
extended Stryn (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Latest comment: 7 years ago12 comments7 people in discussion

Motoko C. [email protected]

Status:    Done

I will held an editathon event on September 21st (KST), so I need a temporary account creator right. You can see more about the event at w:ko:위키백과:인사이트 쉐어링: 위키백과 에디터톤. Motoko C. K. (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Done for 2 weeks. Ruslik (talk) 20:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Importer transwiki for [email protected]

Status:    Done

Please assign the transwiki importer flag for Pierpao on it.wikiversity. Thanks. Samuele2002 (Talk!) 12:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Discussion started on Sept. 13. Is that enough, just after two days? Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
MarcoAurelio. User:Samuele2002 It's very young, very active and... a bit rushy :), usually ther are no other users involved in global debates and last but likely first, he ovelooked the related rule. I posted two warnings, in the procedure discussion and at the Bar (It Wikiversity global issues page). So please wait for us the required time. Regards--Pierpao (talk) 08:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
We discussed the matter informally some days ago on it.wiki as well (here). Small project > efficient project. ;) --Lucas (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
@Lucas: credo ci sia un po' di confusione, fra importer e importer transwiki, sono due cose ben diverse. Il primo importa come possono importare gli admin, il secondo può importare anche "fuori" dal menu a tendina di speciale:importa. Da quanto leggo gli serve e si è discusso del primo soltanto, ma viene chiesto il secondo. --Vituzzu (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
@Vituzzu: Se non leggo al contrario, qui si è chiesto il flag di Importer transwiki (e non quello di importer) che ha il privilegio "import" ma senza il privilegio "importupload", sbaglio? --Lucas (talk) 17:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Hai ragione, ma ho il sospetto che a un certo punto siano state scambiate le etichette. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Confermo che la richiesta è per il flag di Importatore transwiki che può solo importare dalle wiki abilitate (come gli admin). Non di importatore (che può importare da file xlm.). --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 20:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Done --Vituzzu (talk) 13:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Regards--Pierpao (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2017-09&oldid=23314414"