All Questions
Tagged with abelian-categories sheaf-theory
28 questions
0
votes
0
answers
41
views
Proposition (0.1.4.3) in Tamme's Introduction to Etale Cohomology
Proposition 1.4.3, page 7 in Tamme's book, says (among other things) that: given two categories $\cal C$ and $\cal C'$, with $\cal C'$ abelian and AB-$3$, if $\cal C'$ has a generator $Z$ then also ...
1
vote
1
answer
96
views
Why sheaves of abelian groups form an abelian category
I know it is an elementary result. But some details confuse me.
In Vakil's The Rising Sea (version 2022) Theorem 2.6.2 writes:
Sheaves of abelian groups on a topological space $X$ form an abelian ...
4
votes
0
answers
142
views
Why is $ \mathfrak{Mod}(A_{Y}/f) $ a thick subcategory of $\mathfrak{Mod}(A_{Y})$?
Let $f: Y \to X$ be a continuous map and $\mathfrak{Mod}(A_{Y}/f)$ be the full subcategory of $\mathfrak{Mod}(A_{Y})$ (categories of $A_{Y}$-modules, with $A$ a fixed ring) whose sheaves $\mathcal{F}$ ...
3
votes
1
answer
65
views
Do quasi-coherent sheaves form a reflective subcategory?
Let $X = $ Spec $A$ be an affine scheme.
I know that there is an inclusion of categories from $A$-modules to sheaves of $\mathcal O_X$-modules on $X$, which is exact and fully faithful.
It seems to me ...
1
vote
0
answers
63
views
When can we define the stalks of a sheaf?
So i am reading rotman's book on homological algebra, and in it he states in Theorem 5.91, the following:
Let $X$ be a topological space and $\mathcal{A}$ an abelian category and consider the category ...
2
votes
0
answers
73
views
Injective module is stalkwise injective
Let $X$ be a Hausdorff locally compact topological space, $R$ be a sheaf of $\mathbb{C}_X$-algebras on $X$. If necessary, we can assume that $(X,R)$ is a complex manifold. If $M$ is an injective ...
2
votes
1
answer
76
views
What is the difference between $\mathbb C_X$-modules and sheaves of $\mathbb C$-vector spaces?
In the literature I have encountered the notions "category $\mathbb C_X-Mod$ of $\mathbb C_X$-modules" and "category $Sh_{\mathbb C}(X)$ of sheaves of $\mathbb C$-vector spaces". ...
5
votes
2
answers
253
views
Why is the ambiguity of the target category when first defining sheaves not a serious issue?
I am taking notes on (pre)sheaves of topological spaces. This is my first time studying the subject. Some sources define them as functors to $Set$. Others as functors to $Ab$. Or sometimes $Mod_R$. Or ...
7
votes
1
answer
181
views
Is the category of abelian presheaves on a topos closed?
Take the category of presehaves of abelian groups on a topos $\mathcal{C}$. That is, an object of our category is a functor $F: \mathcal{C}^{\operatorname{op}} \to \operatorname{Ab}$.
We have a clear ...
4
votes
1
answer
242
views
Definition of a presheaf on a topological space with values in an abelian category
As far as I know if $C$ be a category, then a presheaf on $C$ is simply a functor $F:C^{op}\longrightarrow Set$. Now, let $X$ be a topological space and let $O(X)$ be the set of opens of $X$. Now, if ...
1
vote
0
answers
31
views
Locally free sheaves of modules form thick subcategory of sheaves of modules
I was wondering, if the following is true: If we have a constant sheaf of rings $K_{X}$ ($K$ a field) over a topological space $X$ and an exact sequence of $K_{X}$-modules
$M_{1}\xrightarrow{f} M_{...
2
votes
1
answer
519
views
If $\textbf{C}$ is an abelian category,thenthe category of presheaves of abelian groups on $\textbf{C}$ is abelian.Is $\textbf{C}$ abelian necessary?
I am looking at an exercise which asks that, if, $\textbf{C}$ is abelian, then the category of presheaves of abelian groups on $\textbf{C}$ is abelian. The proof of this proceeds as you would expect, ...
1
vote
1
answer
39
views
The global section functor of abelian sheaf over a topological space of dimension zero
Let $X$ be a topological space of dimension $0$. I learn from certain text claiming the functor $\Gamma(X,\;\cdot\;)$ gives rise to a categorical equivalence between the category of sheaf of abelian ...
0
votes
0
answers
241
views
Lemma of dévissage from Mumford's AGII
In Mumford's & Oda's Algebraic Geometry II, on page 81 the authors give a proof for 6.12: Lemma of dévissage.
After a careful reading of the proof, I failed to understand an argument:
Theorem 6....
4
votes
2
answers
475
views
Category of sheaves on a topological space is not $\mathbf{AB4^{*}}$
I want to show that the category of sheaves on a topological space ($\mathbf
{Sh}(X)$) is not $\mathbf{AB4^{*}}$. Recall that $\mathbf{AB4^{*}}$ means that the product of epimorphisms is an ...
0
votes
0
answers
64
views
Why do the finitely generated subsheaves of a sheaf form a directed system?
Suppose we have a ringed space $(X, \mathcal{O}_{X})$ with sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_{X}$-modules $\mathcal{F}$. Let $I$ be an indexing set and suppose we have a collection of subsets $U_{i} \subseteq X$ ...
2
votes
0
answers
40
views
Bijection between $\mathcal{G}\subset \mathcal{L}\subset \mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{L}\subset \mathcal{F}/\mathcal{G}$
Let $\mathcal{G}\subset \mathcal{F}$ be two sheaves (say of $A$-module with a suitable ring $A$) on a topological space $X$. Is there an increasing correspondance between the sheaves $\mathcal{L}$ ...
25
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Category of quasicoherent sheaves not abelian
Wikipedia mentions that the category of quasicoherent sheaves need not form an abelian category on general ringed spaces. Is there a `naturally occurring' example of this failing, even for locally ...
3
votes
1
answer
240
views
Boundedness assumption for isomorphism between some derived functors in Kashiwara and Schapira
Let $\mathscr{R}$ be a sheaf of ring on a topological space, and denote $\mathbf{D}^+(\mathscr{R})$ (resp. $\mathbf{D}^-(\mathscr{R})$, $\mathbf{D}^b(\mathscr{R})$) to be the bounded below (resp. ...
6
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Is the category of sheaves of objects from an abelian category abelian?
Suppose we have an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$ and a topological space $X$. Let $\mathscr{F}^{\mathcal{A}}$ be the category of all sheaves of $\mathcal{A}$ objects over $X$. Is $\mathscr{F}^{\...
16
votes
0
answers
296
views
Applications of $Ext^n$ in algebraic geometry
I have been doing a project about $\operatorname{Ext}^n$ functors for my commutative algebra class. I used the approach via extensions of degree n. Basically I have shown the long exact sequence ...
1
vote
0
answers
231
views
When are sheafification and the embedding of sheaves into presheaves exact functors?
Let $\text{PreSh}(X, \mathsf{A})$ and $\text{Sh}(X, \mathsf{A})$ be the categories of $\mathsf{A}$-valued presheaves and sheaves on $X$, respectively. Here, $\mathsf{A}$ is a category such that we ...
0
votes
0
answers
51
views
Are there right-deformations for abelian sheaves?
A sufficient condition for the existence of a point-set derived functor is the existence of a deformation of the corresponding functor. For modules, such a deformation always exists (see section 2.3). ...
10
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Why can we use flabby sheaves to define cohomology?
In my algebraic geometry class, we defined sheaf cohomology using flabby sheaves, and the functor on the category of sheaves on a space $X$:
$$
D: \mathcal F \mapsto D\mathcal F
$$
where
$$
D\...
10
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Example of epimorphisms such that the product is not an epimorphism in the category of sheaves
I've heard that in the category of sheaves over a topological space $X$, products of epimorphisms are not epimorphisms. I think that it's equivalent to saying that $\mathbf{Sh}(X)$ does not satisfy ...
0
votes
0
answers
205
views
Exactness of functors as "iff"; conjecture about bifunctors
The definition of (right-/left-) exact functors is that they preserve (right-/left-) exactness of SESs. However, for some certain nice functors, as $\def\Hom{\text{Hom}\,}\Hom (A,-)$ and $A\otimes-$ ...
3
votes
2
answers
524
views
Does the adjugant of additive functors between abelian categories preserve the abelian structure of the hom-set?
I think the following is a counter-example. I noticed it when trying to prove that the sheafification functor induces isomorphism on the stalks (Vakil 2.4M).
As in Vakil (2.6.3) the stalk functor is ...
6
votes
0
answers
654
views
Mistake in contradiction argument to show that sheafification commutes with cokernel
The sheafification functor is a left-adjoint to the forgetful functor. Hence it commutes with colimits. The cokernel is a colimit. Hence the cokernel of a sheafified morphism is the same as the ...