Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
0 answers
41 views

Proposition (0.1.4.3) in Tamme's Introduction to Etale Cohomology

Proposition 1.4.3, page 7 in Tamme's book, says (among other things) that: given two categories $\cal C$ and $\cal C'$, with $\cal C'$ abelian and AB-$3$, if $\cal C'$ has a generator $Z$ then also ...
Gay Lussac's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
96 views

Why sheaves of abelian groups form an abelian category

I know it is an elementary result. But some details confuse me. In Vakil's The Rising Sea (version 2022) Theorem 2.6.2 writes: Sheaves of abelian groups on a topological space $X$ form an abelian ...
HIGH QUALITY Male Human Being's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
142 views

Why is $ \mathfrak{Mod}(A_{Y}/f) $ a thick subcategory of $\mathfrak{Mod}(A_{Y})$?

Let $f: Y \to X$ be a continuous map and $\mathfrak{Mod}(A_{Y}/f)$ be the full subcategory of $\mathfrak{Mod}(A_{Y})$ (categories of $A_{Y}$-modules, with $A$ a fixed ring) whose sheaves $\mathcal{F}$ ...
Duarte Costa's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
65 views

Do quasi-coherent sheaves form a reflective subcategory?

Let $X = $ Spec $A$ be an affine scheme. I know that there is an inclusion of categories from $A$-modules to sheaves of $\mathcal O_X$-modules on $X$, which is exact and fully faithful. It seems to me ...
Adelhart's user avatar
  • 394
1 vote
0 answers
63 views

When can we define the stalks of a sheaf?

So i am reading rotman's book on homological algebra, and in it he states in Theorem 5.91, the following: Let $X$ be a topological space and $\mathcal{A}$ an abelian category and consider the category ...
Asvr_esn's user avatar
  • 167
2 votes
0 answers
73 views

Injective module is stalkwise injective

Let $X$ be a Hausdorff locally compact topological space, $R$ be a sheaf of $\mathbb{C}_X$-algebras on $X$. If necessary, we can assume that $(X,R)$ is a complex manifold. If $M$ is an injective ...
Doug's user avatar
  • 1,360
2 votes
1 answer
76 views

What is the difference between $\mathbb C_X$-modules and sheaves of $\mathbb C$-vector spaces?

In the literature I have encountered the notions "category $\mathbb C_X-Mod$ of $\mathbb C_X$-modules" and "category $Sh_{\mathbb C}(X)$ of sheaves of $\mathbb C$-vector spaces". ...
Flavius Aetius's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
253 views

Why is the ambiguity of the target category when first defining sheaves not a serious issue?

I am taking notes on (pre)sheaves of topological spaces. This is my first time studying the subject. Some sources define them as functors to $Set$. Others as functors to $Ab$. Or sometimes $Mod_R$. Or ...
Descartes Before the Horse's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
181 views

Is the category of abelian presheaves on a topos closed?

Take the category of presehaves of abelian groups on a topos $\mathcal{C}$. That is, an object of our category is a functor $F: \mathcal{C}^{\operatorname{op}} \to \operatorname{Ab}$. We have a clear ...
Sofía Marlasca Aparicio's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
242 views

Definition of a presheaf on a topological space with values in an abelian category

As far as I know if $C$ be a category, then a presheaf on $C$ is simply a functor $F:C^{op}\longrightarrow Set$. Now, let $X$ be a topological space and let $O(X)$ be the set of opens of $X$. Now, if ...
Pouya Layeghi's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
31 views

Locally free sheaves of modules form thick subcategory of sheaves of modules

I was wondering, if the following is true: If we have a constant sheaf of rings $K_{X}$ ($K$ a field) over a topological space $X$ and an exact sequence of $K_{X}$-modules $M_{1}\xrightarrow{f} M_{...
user520682's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
519 views

If $\textbf{C}$ is an abelian category,thenthe category of presheaves of abelian groups on $\textbf{C}$ is abelian.Is $\textbf{C}$ abelian necessary?

I am looking at an exercise which asks that, if, $\textbf{C}$ is abelian, then the category of presheaves of abelian groups on $\textbf{C}$ is abelian. The proof of this proceeds as you would expect, ...
Loosen_Requirements's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
39 views

The global section functor of abelian sheaf over a topological space of dimension zero

Let $X$ be a topological space of dimension $0$. I learn from certain text claiming the functor $\Gamma(X,\;\cdot\;)$ gives rise to a categorical equivalence between the category of sheaf of abelian ...
Ivan So's user avatar
  • 797
0 votes
0 answers
241 views

Lemma of dévissage from Mumford's AGII

In Mumford's & Oda's Algebraic Geometry II, on page 81 the authors give a proof for 6.12: Lemma of dévissage. After a careful reading of the proof, I failed to understand an argument: Theorem 6....
user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
475 views

Category of sheaves on a topological space is not $\mathbf{AB4^{*}}$

I want to show that the category of sheaves on a topological space ($\mathbf {Sh}(X)$) is not $\mathbf{AB4^{*}}$. Recall that $\mathbf{AB4^{*}}$ means that the product of epimorphisms is an ...
user_12345's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
64 views

Why do the finitely generated subsheaves of a sheaf form a directed system?

Suppose we have a ringed space $(X, \mathcal{O}_{X})$ with sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_{X}$-modules $\mathcal{F}$. Let $I$ be an indexing set and suppose we have a collection of subsets $U_{i} \subseteq X$ ...
Luke's user avatar
  • 3,693
2 votes
0 answers
40 views

Bijection between $\mathcal{G}\subset \mathcal{L}\subset \mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{L}\subset \mathcal{F}/\mathcal{G}$

Let $\mathcal{G}\subset \mathcal{F}$ be two sheaves (say of $A$-module with a suitable ring $A$) on a topological space $X$. Is there an increasing correspondance between the sheaves $\mathcal{L}$ ...
Stabilo's user avatar
  • 1,548
25 votes
1 answer
1k views

Category of quasicoherent sheaves not abelian

Wikipedia mentions that the category of quasicoherent sheaves need not form an abelian category on general ringed spaces. Is there a `naturally occurring' example of this failing, even for locally ...
Jonathan Gleason's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
240 views

Boundedness assumption for isomorphism between some derived functors in Kashiwara and Schapira

Let $\mathscr{R}$ be a sheaf of ring on a topological space, and denote $\mathbf{D}^+(\mathscr{R})$ (resp. $\mathbf{D}^-(\mathscr{R})$, $\mathbf{D}^b(\mathscr{R})$) to be the bounded below (resp. ...
Chris Kuo's user avatar
  • 1,653
6 votes
2 answers
2k views

Is the category of sheaves of objects from an abelian category abelian?

Suppose we have an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$ and a topological space $X$. Let $\mathscr{F}^{\mathcal{A}}$ be the category of all sheaves of $\mathcal{A}$ objects over $X$. Is $\mathscr{F}^{\...
BHT's user avatar
  • 2,255
16 votes
0 answers
296 views

Applications of $Ext^n$ in algebraic geometry

I have been doing a project about $\operatorname{Ext}^n$ functors for my commutative algebra class. I used the approach via extensions of degree n. Basically I have shown the long exact sequence ...
Abellan's user avatar
  • 3,795
1 vote
0 answers
231 views

When are sheafification and the embedding of sheaves into presheaves exact functors?

Let $\text{PreSh}(X, \mathsf{A})$ and $\text{Sh}(X, \mathsf{A})$ be the categories of $\mathsf{A}$-valued presheaves and sheaves on $X$, respectively. Here, $\mathsf{A}$ is a category such that we ...
ಠ_ಠ's user avatar
  • 11k
0 votes
0 answers
51 views

Are there right-deformations for abelian sheaves?

A sufficient condition for the existence of a point-set derived functor is the existence of a deformation of the corresponding functor. For modules, such a deformation always exists (see section 2.3). ...
Arrow's user avatar
  • 14.2k
10 votes
2 answers
3k views

Why can we use flabby sheaves to define cohomology?

In my algebraic geometry class, we defined sheaf cohomology using flabby sheaves, and the functor on the category of sheaves on a space $X$: $$ D: \mathcal F \mapsto D\mathcal F $$ where $$ D\...
John Gowers's user avatar
  • 25.4k
10 votes
1 answer
1k views

Example of epimorphisms such that the product is not an epimorphism in the category of sheaves

I've heard that in the category of sheaves over a topological space $X$, products of epimorphisms are not epimorphisms. I think that it's equivalent to saying that $\mathbf{Sh}(X)$ does not satisfy ...
user40276's user avatar
  • 5,423
0 votes
0 answers
205 views

Exactness of functors as "iff"; conjecture about bifunctors

The definition of (right-/left-) exact functors is that they preserve (right-/left-) exactness of SESs. However, for some certain nice functors, as $\def\Hom{\text{Hom}\,}\Hom (A,-)$ and $A\otimes-$ ...
Rodrigo's user avatar
  • 7,856
3 votes
2 answers
524 views

Does the adjugant of additive functors between abelian categories preserve the abelian structure of the hom-set?

I think the following is a counter-example. I noticed it when trying to prove that the sheafification functor induces isomorphism on the stalks (Vakil 2.4M). As in Vakil (2.6.3) the stalk functor is ...
Rodrigo's user avatar
  • 7,856
6 votes
0 answers
654 views

Mistake in contradiction argument to show that sheafification commutes with cokernel

The sheafification functor is a left-adjoint to the forgetful functor. Hence it commutes with colimits. The cokernel is a colimit. Hence the cokernel of a sheafified morphism is the same as the ...
Rodrigo's user avatar
  • 7,856