Young’s communicative democracy as a complement to Habermas’ deliberative democracy, 2023
We have seen that Young considers Habermas’s proposal – and
in general of deliberative philosophe... more We have seen that Young considers Habermas’s proposal – and in general of deliberative philosophers – an advance in relation to fragile democratic models in which self-interest counts. However, the author argues that the deliberative model is still flawed and should be complemented by a model of communicative democracy. The flaw in the model proposed by Habermas lies in the exclusion it generates of subordinate and historically marginalized individuals and social groups from the deliberative processes in racist, sexist, and elitist societies.
Young’s communicative democracy as a complement to Habermas’ deliberative democracy, 2023
We have seen that Young considers Habermas’s proposal – and
in general of deliberative philosophe... more We have seen that Young considers Habermas’s proposal – and in general of deliberative philosophers – an advance in relation to fragile democratic models in which self-interest counts. However, the author argues that the deliberative model is still flawed and should be complemented by a model of communicative democracy. The flaw in the model proposed by Habermas lies in the exclusion it generates of subordinate and historically marginalized individuals and social groups from the deliberative processes in racist, sexist, and elitist societies.
Uploads
Papers by Emil Sobottka
in general of deliberative philosophers – an advance in relation to
fragile democratic models in which self-interest counts. However,
the author argues that the deliberative model is still flawed and should be complemented by a model of communicative democracy.
The flaw in the model proposed by Habermas lies in the exclusion
it generates of subordinate and historically marginalized individuals
and social groups from the deliberative processes in racist, sexist, and
elitist societies.
in general of deliberative philosophers – an advance in relation to
fragile democratic models in which self-interest counts. However,
the author argues that the deliberative model is still flawed and should be complemented by a model of communicative democracy.
The flaw in the model proposed by Habermas lies in the exclusion
it generates of subordinate and historically marginalized individuals
and social groups from the deliberative processes in racist, sexist, and
elitist societies.