Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yinlu Foods
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. LFaraone 00:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yinlu Foods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Darkness Shines (talk) 18:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, maybe if good references are provided it would be okay, but at the moment, there is none. A google search has a few hits showing promise, but it may be possible to give it a section in it's parent company's article.--Beachsand2004 (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- This !vote has been struck as coming from a sockpuppet account. See this SPI. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, good deal of secondary source coverage in news articles among multiple different language news sources. — Cirt (talk) 17:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I'm not sure how big a company needs to be to be notable, but I think Yinlu should reach the standard - I just added a source from Bloomberg saying it had >10,000 employees and revenues of >$800 million USD in 2010. The company has expanded since then and Baidupedia says they have 15,000 employees and revenues of 10 billion RMB = 1.6 billion USD. 114.252.103.184 (talk) 05:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Agree with 114.252.103.184 Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Size isn't a formal standard, in part because it will vary with different fields of endeavor. But this large a company will be notable, and athe multiple sources in the GNews search linked to in the AfD listing show it. I wonder if the nom looked at them? DGG ( talk ) 06:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Obviously, but they all looked to be talking about Nestle's acquisition of a 60% stake. I could not read the foreign language ones but will defer you you on their coverage. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep appears to be notable. Eeekster (talk) 01:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.