Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xie Qiuping (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BJ^Talk 01:54, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xie Qiuping

Fails WP:BLP1E Donald Albury 21:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Hair length and the recognition that comes with it are not events but continuing conditions. The article is referenced. --Eastmain (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I would say that the condition of this woman's hair being the longest known at this time is an ongoing event. It is subject to ending at any time if someone else is shown to have longer hair. I think this person falls within the intent of WP:BLP1E. -- Donald Albury 18:59, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Protonk (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The nominator's rationale is invalid. WP:BLP1E is about people who are caught up in a single news event, not about people who are only notable in one way. If we were to interpret it that way, as the nominator seems to be doing, then we would have very few articles about any people at all. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Phil Bridger, and also because someone in the Guinneas Book of Records is definitely notable. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 18:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.