Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torture in china prisons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Torture in china prisons

Appears like entirely original research. No references, massive amounts of POV - this is not an encyclopedia entry, it's a class essay. The article is not even really about the title; it is an analysis of human crimes itself, using China as home base. Tan | 39 03:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, it is irretrievably POV and original research. --Deadly∀ssassin^(talk) 03:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essay, OR. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - author blanked the page (Keilana reverted) - this probably meets speedy criteria G7 now. Tan | 39 04:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This subject probably is notable. Google "torture in China prisons". I'd say this is a stub, not an article worthy of deletion. TheNobleSith (talk) 04:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did google it - it's sort of like googling "hiking in Arizona" or "Communism in Cuba"; it would be very hard to write a well-referenced yet entirely NPOV article. You couldn't even stub anything out of this one, there's nothing that's not original research. With the author blanking the page, this should be speedy deleted now. Tan | 39 04:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per CSD G7; it counts after author blanked - right? Plus it's an essay, which I do not count for speedy deletion. BoL (Talk) 04:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We already have Human rights in the People's Republic of China. No need for this orginal researchy NPOV essay. Bfigura ^(talk) 04:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per user above.RyRy5 ^{Talk to RyRy} 04:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original research/essay; subject already covered in Human rights in the People's Republic of China. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Full of POV and original research. Topic could be notable but there's already Human rights in the People's Republic of China. PeterSymonds | talk 07:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Covered already, censorship makes it hard to verify enyway, reads like a blog entry. Minkythecat (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the better article. I like the recommendations. If President Hu reads Wikipedia every day, you might change the world... Mandsford (talk) 12:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

President who? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

China's leader Hu Jintao, will be speaking on this, and there will be a response by former Interior Secretary James Watt. Hu's on first. Watt's on second. Mandsford (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Blatant POV and original research. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete this POV personal essay. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 04:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Per Heavy POV. TheAsianGURU (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per suggestion above. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.